Skip to content

Efficacy of Gamma Camera Used Intraoperatively for ID of Sentinel Lymph Nodes w/ Lymphoscintigraphy

Efficacy of a Novel, High-Sensitivity, Portable, Hand-Held Gamma Camera Used Intraoperatively for Identification of Sentinel Lymph Nodes With Lymphoscintigraphy

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01314963
Enrollment
50
Registered
2011-03-15
Start date
2008-06-30
Completion date
2012-07-26
Last updated
2018-04-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Breast Cancer, Multiple Myeloma

Brief summary

This study evaluates the ability of a prototype intraoperative handheld gamma camera (pIHGC) to image (detect) sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) in melanoma and breast cancer during surgical excision, as compared to standard of care intraoperative gamma probes (GP). The unit of study in this trial was SNLs rather individual participants. Each device was assessed for relative node detection sensitivity (S) of those SLNs.

Detailed description

Lymphoscintigraphy is an accepted and commonly-performed procedure used for staging of certain cancers, especially melanoma and breast cancer. It involves injecting a small amount of radioactivity under the skin in order to identify lymph nodes which should be biopsied (ie, the sentinel lymph node, SLN) to determine if cancer has spread. The study objective was to evaluate the potential benefit of a new, camera-based technology (prototype device) which allows actual images to be obtained intra-operatively in the identification of sentinel nodes. Each device was assessed for relative node detection sensitivity (S), defined as the proportion of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) that were identified with each instrument, with the proportion determined as the number of true positives (TP) divided by the total evaluated (N).

Interventions

DEVICEPrototype intraoperative handheld gamma camera (pIHGC)

The prototype intraoperative handheld gamma camera (pIHGC) consists of a parallel-hole lead collimator coupled to a pixilated sodium iodide-thallium \[NaI(Tl)\] scintillation crystal array, itself coupled to a flat panel, multi-anode Hamamatsu H8500 position-sensitive photomultiplier tube. The collimator is 5x5 cm2 large in area and 1.5 cm thick, with 1.3 mm hexagonal holes and 0.2 mm septa. The 1.7 mm pitch crystal array is composed of 29x29 individual crystals, each 1.5x1.5x6 mm3 in size.

DEVICELymphoscintigraphy with intraoperative gamma probes (GP)

Lymphoscintigraphy with standard of care intraoperative gamma probes (GP)

RADIATIONradioactive Tc99M

Lymphoscintigraphy involves injection of 0.4 to 1.0 mCi of radioactive Tc99M sulfur colloid around at the tumor site.

Sponsors

Whitaker Foundation
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Stanford University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

The unit of study in this trial was sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) rather individual participants. with the comparison conducted by evaluation of each SLN with the prototype intraoperative handheld gamma camera (pIHGC) and standard of care intraoperative gamma probes (GP).

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Malignancy for which sentinel node biopsy with lymphoscintigraphy are indicated as part of the standard of care for tumor staging * Age 18 or greater. * Healthy enough for surgery * Able to understand and willing to sign a written informed consent document.

Exclusion criteria

* No exclusion requirements due to co-morbid disease or intercurrent illness. * Documented allergy to colloid. * Lymphoscintigraphy presents excessive high risk, eg, a consideration if pregnant or lactating

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Relative Node Detection Sensitivity1 dayRelative node detection sensitivity (S) was defined as the proportion of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) that were identified with each instrument, with the proportion determined as the number of true positives (TP) divided by the total evaluated (N). The outcome result is expressed as the percentage for each device with 95% confidence intervals.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
All Participants
This study evaluates the ability of 2 procedures to detect sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs), and does not evaluate between groups of participants.
50
Total50

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAll Participants
Age, Customized
18 years old or greater
50 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
50 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
50 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
50 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
27 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
23 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 500 / 50
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 500 / 50
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 500 / 50

Outcome results

Primary

Relative Node Detection Sensitivity

Relative node detection sensitivity (S) was defined as the proportion of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) that were identified with each instrument, with the proportion determined as the number of true positives (TP) divided by the total evaluated (N). The outcome result is expressed as the percentage for each device with 95% confidence intervals.

Time frame: 1 day

Population: Sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) were evaluated for detection by the 2 methods.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Intraoperative Handheld Gamma Camera (pIHGC)Relative Node Detection Sensitivity88.5 Percentage (%) of SLNs detected
Gamma Probes (GP)Relative Node Detection Sensitivity94.2 Percentage (%) of SLNs detected

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026