Skip to content

Comparison of the Effect of Two Types of Fixed Retainers on the Health of the Gums

Clinical and Radiographic Comparison and Evaluation of Two Types of Lingual Fixed Retainers on the Health of Periodontium

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01314729
Enrollment
48
Registered
2011-03-14
Start date
2010-05-31
Completion date
2011-05-31
Last updated
2011-03-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health of Periodontium

Keywords

Orthodontic fixed retainer, fiber-reinforced-composite retainer, composite-wire retainer

Brief summary

Different types of retainers have been used to assure the stability of orthodontic treatment. The aim of this study is clinical and radiographic comparison and evaluation of two common types of lingual fixed retainers on the health of periodontium. The participants in this study will be examined both clinically and radiographically just after the completion of orthodontic treatment and after a 6-month-period. The results of the study will be analyzed with Mann-whitney and independent t-test.

Interventions

DEVICEFiber-reinforced-composite retainer

this type of retainer is placed on the lingual surface of teeth from canine to canine just before the completion of orthodontic treatment

DEVICEComposite-wire retainer

this type of retainer is placed on the lingual surface of teeth from canine to canine just before the completion of orthodontic treatment to prevent treatment relapse

Sponsors

Shiraz Dental School, Orthodontic Research Center
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Shiraz University of Medical Sciences
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
13 Years to 18 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. The patient who have completed orthodontic treatment 2. The patients should be healthy with no systemic disease at the time 3. In clinical examination no apparent periodontal disease or inflammation should be present 4. Patients who have complete permanent dentition (3rd molar eruption is not required)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Measuring periodontal status through clinical examinationapproximately 20 monthsfor each participant, the examination is carried out right after the completion of orthodontic treatment and after a 6-month-period
measuring PDL width in periapical radiographsapproximately 20 monthsfor each participant, the examination is carried out right after the completion of orthodontic treatment and after a 6-month-period

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Assessing periodontial status with Gingival Indexapproximately 20 monthsA gingival Index score will be assigned to each patient upon completion of orthodontic treatment and after a 6-month-period
assessing periodontal status using Plaque Indexapproximately 20 monthsA plaque Index score will be assigned to each patient upon completion of orthodontic treatment and after a 6-month-period
assessing periodontal status using Calculus Indexapproximately 20 monthsA Calculus Index score will be assigned to each patient upon completion of orthodontic treatment and after a 6-month-period
assessing periodontal status using Bleeding on probingapproximately 20 monthsEach patient will be examined for bleeding on probing upon completion of orthodontic treatment and after a 6-month-period

Countries

Iran

Contacts

Primary ContactSepideh Torkan, resident
sepideh.torkan@yahoo.com0098 913327 1281

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 7, 2026