Skip to content

A Study to Investigate the Use of Golimumab (Simponi®) in Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis, Psoriatic Arthritis and Ankylosing Spondylitis (P06554)

Non-Interventional Study Investigating the Use of Golimumab (Simponi®) in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis, Psoriatic Arthritis, and Ankylosing Spondylitis

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01313858
Acronym
GO-NICE
Enrollment
1613
Registered
2011-03-14
Start date
2010-04-30
Completion date
2015-09-30
Last updated
2016-11-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Arthritis, Psoriatic, Arthritis, Rheumatoid, Spondylitis, Ankylosing

Brief summary

This is a study to assess the use of golimumab (Simponi®) in participants with rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, and ankylosing spondylitis. The study objective is to evaluate the clinical safety of golimumab (Simponi®) under real-life, clinical practice conditions as assessed by the incidence and type of (serious) adverse events and changes in clinical status of participants as assessed by clinical parameters.

Interventions

DRUGSimponi®
DRUGMethotrexate

Given concomitantly with Simponi®

Sponsors

Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Has rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, or ankylosing spondylitis and treatment with Simponi® by autoinjector device is to be initiated for the first time

Exclusion criteria

* No specific

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Disease StatusBaseline (BL; Month 0), Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, Month 12, Month 15, Month 18, Month 21, Month 24The CGI is a non-disease-specific evaluation of participants' overall health status assessed on a 10 mm visual analogue scale (VAS) ranging from 0 (free of complaints) to 10 (strong discomfort). The closer the score to 0, the better the health status.
Change From Baseline in FFbH (Funktionsfragebogen Hannover) Questionnaire ScoreBaseline and Months 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24The FFbH is a participant questionnaire assessing disability/functional impairment. Ability to perform 18 activities of daily living are scored on a 3 point scale (2=Yes, 1=Yes but with effort, and 0=No or with assistance) and summed. Remaining functional capacity is calculated as the percent of the maximum number of score points (FFbH\[%\] = (Attained score\*100)/(2\*n) where n is the number of completed responses) with range from 0 = total loss of functional capacity to 100 = maximal functional capacity. Increase from baseline in FFbH score signifies improvement. The FFbH is similar to Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) but is more widely used in Germany.
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) ScoreBaseline and Months 3, 6, 12, 18, 24The FACIT-F scale assesses self-reported fatigue and its impact upon daily activities and function. 13 items consisting of fatigue, weakness, listlessness, tiredness, trouble with starting things, trouble with finishing things, energy, activity, sleep, eating, help doing activities, frustration, and social activities are scored on a scale of 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much), except energy and activity which are reversed scored. Individual item scores are then summed to provide the final FACIT-F score with range from 0 (lowest) to 52 (highest quality of life). Increase from baseline in FACIT-F score signifies improvement.
Change From Baseline in EuroQol- 5 Dimension 3 Level Version (EQ-5D-3L) Questionnaire ScoreBaseline and Months 6, 12, 18, 24The EQ-5D-3L is a health profile questionnaire that assesses quality of life along 5 dimensions. Participants rate 5 aspects of health (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression) by choosing from 3 answering options (1=no problems; 2=some problems; 3=extreme problems). The summed score ranges from 1-15 with 1 corresponding to no problems and 15 corresponding to severe problems in the 5 dimensions. Decrease from baseline in EQ-5D-3L signifies improvement.
Number of Participants Who Experienced at Least One Adverse EventUp to 24 monthsAn adverse event is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign including an abnormal laboratory finding, symptom or disease associated with the use of a medical treatment or procedure, regardless of whether it is considered related to the medical treatment or procedure.
Number of Participants Who Experienced at Least One Serious Adverse EventUp to 24 monthsA serious adverse event is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign including an abnormal laboratory finding, symptom or disease associated with the use of a medical treatment or procedure, regardless of whether it is considered related to the medical treatment or procedure that results in death, life-threatening adverse event, permanent or significant disability / unfitness for work, hospital treatment (i.e., admission to hospital) or prolongation of a patient's length of stay, or congenital deformity or birth defect.

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis
Simponi®-naïve participants with rheumatoid arthritis given Simponi® 50 mg once a month as a subcutaneous injection. Combination use with methotrexate was recommended.
474
Participants With Psoriatic Arthritis
Simponi®-naïve participants with psoriatic arthritis given Simponi® 50 mg once a month as a subcutaneous injection.
501
Participants With Ankylosing Spondylitis
Simponi®-naïve participants with ankylosing spondylitis given Simponi® 50 mg once a month as a subcutaneous injection.
483
Total1,458

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up355147
Overall StudyPremature Treatment Termination251219191

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicParticipants With Rheumatoid ArthritisParticipants With Psoriatic ArthritisParticipants With Ankylosing SpondylitisTotal
Age, Continuous54.9 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.38
50.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.07
43.6 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.29
49.6 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.39
Sex: Female, Male
Female
345 Participants271 Participants162 Participants778 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
129 Participants230 Participants321 Participants680 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
315 / 1,613
serious
Total, serious adverse events
204 / 1,613

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in EuroQol- 5 Dimension 3 Level Version (EQ-5D-3L) Questionnaire Score

The EQ-5D-3L is a health profile questionnaire that assesses quality of life along 5 dimensions. Participants rate 5 aspects of health (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression) by choosing from 3 answering options (1=no problems; 2=some problems; 3=extreme problems). The summed score ranges from 1-15 with 1 corresponding to no problems and 15 corresponding to severe problems in the 5 dimensions. Decrease from baseline in EQ-5D-3L signifies improvement.

Time frame: Baseline and Months 6, 12, 18, 24

Population: The mITT population consists of all participants who were treated with Simponi® and have a baseline assessment and at least one additional visit, regardless of any protocol violations during the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Participants With Rheumatoid ArthritisChange From Baseline in EuroQol- 5 Dimension 3 Level Version (EQ-5D-3L) Questionnaire ScoreMonth 6 (n=254;302;293)-0.69 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.15
Participants With Rheumatoid ArthritisChange From Baseline in EuroQol- 5 Dimension 3 Level Version (EQ-5D-3L) Questionnaire ScoreMonth 12 (n=211;236;242)-0.97 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.16
Participants With Rheumatoid ArthritisChange From Baseline in EuroQol- 5 Dimension 3 Level Version (EQ-5D-3L) Questionnaire ScoreMonth 18 (n=161;206;211)-1.11 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.17
Participants With Rheumatoid ArthritisChange From Baseline in EuroQol- 5 Dimension 3 Level Version (EQ-5D-3L) Questionnaire ScoreMonth 24 (n=162;191;210)-1.08 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.17
Participants With Psoriatic ArthritisChange From Baseline in EuroQol- 5 Dimension 3 Level Version (EQ-5D-3L) Questionnaire ScoreMonth 24 (n=162;191;210)-1.29 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.17
Participants With Psoriatic ArthritisChange From Baseline in EuroQol- 5 Dimension 3 Level Version (EQ-5D-3L) Questionnaire ScoreMonth 6 (n=254;302;293)-1.07 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.14
Participants With Psoriatic ArthritisChange From Baseline in EuroQol- 5 Dimension 3 Level Version (EQ-5D-3L) Questionnaire ScoreMonth 18 (n=161;206;211)-1.35 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.16
Participants With Psoriatic ArthritisChange From Baseline in EuroQol- 5 Dimension 3 Level Version (EQ-5D-3L) Questionnaire ScoreMonth 12 (n=211;236;242)-1.35 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.15
Participants With Ankylosing SpondylitisChange From Baseline in EuroQol- 5 Dimension 3 Level Version (EQ-5D-3L) Questionnaire ScoreMonth 24 (n=162;191;210)-1.51 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.15
Participants With Ankylosing SpondylitisChange From Baseline in EuroQol- 5 Dimension 3 Level Version (EQ-5D-3L) Questionnaire ScoreMonth 12 (n=211;236;242)-1.24 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.14
Participants With Ankylosing SpondylitisChange From Baseline in EuroQol- 5 Dimension 3 Level Version (EQ-5D-3L) Questionnaire ScoreMonth 18 (n=161;206;211)-1.25 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.15
Participants With Ankylosing SpondylitisChange From Baseline in EuroQol- 5 Dimension 3 Level Version (EQ-5D-3L) Questionnaire ScoreMonth 6 (n=254;302;293)-1.18 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.14
Comparison: Least squares mean difference from baseline in EQ-5D-3L at Month 6 (Month 6 minus BL)p-value: <0.0001Repeated measures analysis
Comparison: Least squares mean difference from baseline in EQ-5D-3L at Month 12 (Month 12 minus BL)p-value: <0.0001Repeated measures analysis
Comparison: Least squares mean difference from baseline in EQ-5D-3L at Month 18 (Month 18 minus BL)p-value: <0.0001Repeated measures analysis
Comparison: Least squares mean difference from baseline in EQ-5D-3L at Month 24 (Month 24 minus BL)p-value: <0.0001Repeated measures analysis
Comparison: Least squares mean difference from baseline in EQ-5D-3L at Month 6 (Month 6 minus BL)p-value: <0.0001Repeated measures analysis
Comparison: Least squares mean difference from baseline in EQ-5D-3L at Month 12 (Month 12 minus BL)p-value: <0.0001Repeated measures analysis
Comparison: Least squares mean difference from baseline in EQ-5D-3L at Month 18 (Month 18 minus BL)p-value: <0.0001Repeated measures analysis
Comparison: Least squares mean difference from baseline in EQ-5D-3L at Month 24 (Month 24 minus BL)p-value: <0.0001Repeated measures analysis
Comparison: Least squares mean difference from baseline in EQ-5D-3L at Month 6 (Month 6 minus BL)p-value: <0.0001Repeated measures analysis
Comparison: Least squares mean difference from baseline in EQ-5D-3L at Month 12 (Month 12 minus BL)p-value: <0.0001Repeated measures analysis
Comparison: Least squares mean difference from baseline in EQ-5D-3L at Month 18 (Month 18 minus BL)p-value: <0.0001Repeated measures analysis
Comparison: Least squares mean difference from baseline in EQ-5D-3L at Month 24 (Month 24 minus BL)p-value: <0.0001Repeated measures analysis
Primary

Change From Baseline in FFbH (Funktionsfragebogen Hannover) Questionnaire Score

The FFbH is a participant questionnaire assessing disability/functional impairment. Ability to perform 18 activities of daily living are scored on a 3 point scale (2=Yes, 1=Yes but with effort, and 0=No or with assistance) and summed. Remaining functional capacity is calculated as the percent of the maximum number of score points (FFbH\[%\] = (Attained score\*100)/(2\*n) where n is the number of completed responses) with range from 0 = total loss of functional capacity to 100 = maximal functional capacity. Increase from baseline in FFbH score signifies improvement. The FFbH is similar to Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) but is more widely used in Germany.

Time frame: Baseline and Months 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24

Population: The mITT population consists of all participants who were treated with Simponi® and have a baseline assessment and at least one additional visit, regardless of any protocol violations during the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Participants With Rheumatoid ArthritisChange From Baseline in FFbH (Funktionsfragebogen Hannover) Questionnaire ScoreMonth 3 (n=348;361;375)5.29 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.56
Participants With Rheumatoid ArthritisChange From Baseline in FFbH (Funktionsfragebogen Hannover) Questionnaire ScoreMonth 6 (n=263;310;297)5.71 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.69
Participants With Rheumatoid ArthritisChange From Baseline in FFbH (Funktionsfragebogen Hannover) Questionnaire ScoreMonth 9 (n=226;265;262)5.78 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.77
Participants With Rheumatoid ArthritisChange From Baseline in FFbH (Funktionsfragebogen Hannover) Questionnaire ScoreMonth 12 (n=218;247;247)5.70 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.79
Participants With Rheumatoid ArthritisChange From Baseline in FFbH (Funktionsfragebogen Hannover) Questionnaire ScoreMonth 15 (n=188;222;234)5.63 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.89
Participants With Rheumatoid ArthritisChange From Baseline in FFbH (Funktionsfragebogen Hannover) Questionnaire ScoreMonth 18 (n=168;211;216)6.98 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.96
Participants With Rheumatoid ArthritisChange From Baseline in FFbH (Funktionsfragebogen Hannover) Questionnaire ScoreMonth 21 (n=166;198;200)5.43 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.97
Participants With Rheumatoid ArthritisChange From Baseline in FFbH (Funktionsfragebogen Hannover) Questionnaire ScoreMonth 24 (n=167;198;211)7.42 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.97
Participants With Psoriatic ArthritisChange From Baseline in FFbH (Funktionsfragebogen Hannover) Questionnaire ScoreMonth 9 (n=226;265;262)7.07 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.69
Participants With Psoriatic ArthritisChange From Baseline in FFbH (Funktionsfragebogen Hannover) Questionnaire ScoreMonth 21 (n=166;198;200)9.18 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.86
Participants With Psoriatic ArthritisChange From Baseline in FFbH (Funktionsfragebogen Hannover) Questionnaire ScoreMonth 12 (n=218;247;247)7.86 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.73
Participants With Psoriatic ArthritisChange From Baseline in FFbH (Funktionsfragebogen Hannover) Questionnaire ScoreMonth 15 (n=188;222;234)6.64 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.79
Participants With Psoriatic ArthritisChange From Baseline in FFbH (Funktionsfragebogen Hannover) Questionnaire ScoreMonth 18 (n=168;211;216)8.99 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.82
Participants With Psoriatic ArthritisChange From Baseline in FFbH (Funktionsfragebogen Hannover) Questionnaire ScoreMonth 3 (n=348;361;375)5.82 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.54
Participants With Psoriatic ArthritisChange From Baseline in FFbH (Funktionsfragebogen Hannover) Questionnaire ScoreMonth 6 (n=263;310;297)6.31 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.61
Participants With Psoriatic ArthritisChange From Baseline in FFbH (Funktionsfragebogen Hannover) Questionnaire ScoreMonth 24 (n=167;198;211)7.71 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.86
Participants With Ankylosing SpondylitisChange From Baseline in FFbH (Funktionsfragebogen Hannover) Questionnaire ScoreMonth 9 (n=226;265;262)9.67 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.45
Participants With Ankylosing SpondylitisChange From Baseline in FFbH (Funktionsfragebogen Hannover) Questionnaire ScoreMonth 6 (n=263;310;297)10.01 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.4
Participants With Ankylosing SpondylitisChange From Baseline in FFbH (Funktionsfragebogen Hannover) Questionnaire ScoreMonth 3 (n=348;361;375)8.66 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.31
Participants With Ankylosing SpondylitisChange From Baseline in FFbH (Funktionsfragebogen Hannover) Questionnaire ScoreMonth 12 (n=218;247;247)8.34 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.48
Participants With Ankylosing SpondylitisChange From Baseline in FFbH (Funktionsfragebogen Hannover) Questionnaire ScoreMonth 21 (n=166;198;200)7.95 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.59
Participants With Ankylosing SpondylitisChange From Baseline in FFbH (Funktionsfragebogen Hannover) Questionnaire ScoreMonth 18 (n=168;211;216)8.79 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.54
Participants With Ankylosing SpondylitisChange From Baseline in FFbH (Funktionsfragebogen Hannover) Questionnaire ScoreMonth 15 (n=188;222;234)9.04 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.5
Participants With Ankylosing SpondylitisChange From Baseline in FFbH (Funktionsfragebogen Hannover) Questionnaire ScoreMonth 24 (n=167;198;211)9.51 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.56
Comparison: Least squares mean difference from baseline in FFbH at Month 3 (Month 3 minus BL)p-value: 0.0007Repeated measures analysis
Comparison: Least squares mean difference from baseline in FFbH at Month 6 (Month 6 minus BL)p-value: 0.0007Repeated measures analysis
Comparison: Least squares mean difference from baseline in FFbH at Month 9 (Month 9 minus BL)p-value: 0.0011Repeated measures analysis
Comparison: Least squares mean difference from baseline in FFbH at Month 12 (Month 12 minus BL)p-value: 0.0015Repeated measures analysis
Comparison: Least squares mean difference from baseline in FFbH at Month 15 (Month 15 minus BL)p-value: 0.0029Repeated measures analysis
Comparison: Least squares mean difference from baseline in FFbH at Month 18 (Month 18 minus BL)p-value: 0.0004Repeated measures analysis
Comparison: Least squares mean difference from baseline in FFbH at Month 21 (Month 21 minus BL)p-value: 0.0059Repeated measures analysis
Comparison: Least squares mean difference from baseline in FFbH at Month 24 (Month 24 minus BL)p-value: 0.0002Repeated measures analysis
Comparison: Least squares mean difference from baseline in FFbH at Month 3 (Month 3 minus BL)p-value: 0.0002Repeated measures analysis
Comparison: Least squares mean difference from baseline in FFbH at Month 6 (Month 6 minus BL)p-value: <0.0001Repeated measures analysis
Comparison: Least squares mean difference from baseline in FFbH at Month 9 (Month 9 minus BL)p-value: <0.0001Repeated measures analysis
Comparison: Least squares mean difference from baseline in FFbH at Month 12 (Month 12 minus BL)p-value: <0.0001Repeated measures analysis
Comparison: Least squares mean difference from baseline in FFbH at Month 15 (Month 15 minus BL)p-value: 0.0002Repeated measures analysis
Comparison: Least squares mean difference from baseline in FFbH at Month 18 (Month 18 minus BL)p-value: <0.0001Repeated measures analysis
Comparison: Least squares mean difference from baseline in FFbH at Month 21 (Month 21 minus BL)p-value: <0.0001Repeated measures analysis
Comparison: Least squares mean difference from baseline in FFbH at Month 24 (Month 24 minus BL)p-value: <0.0001Repeated measures analysis
Comparison: Least squares mean difference from baseline in FFbH at Month 3 (Month 3 minus BL)p-value: <0.0001Repeated measures analysis
Comparison: Least squares mean difference from baseline in FFbH at Month 6 (Month 6 minus BL)p-value: <0.0001Repeated measures analysis
Comparison: Least squares mean difference from baseline in FFbH at Month 9 (Month 9 minus BL)p-value: <0.0001Repeated measures analysis
Comparison: Least squares mean difference from baseline in FFbH at Month 12 (Month 12 minus BL)p-value: <0.0001Repeated measures analysis
Comparison: Least squares mean difference from baseline in FFbH at Month 15 (Month 15 minus BL)p-value: <0.0001Repeated measures analysis
Comparison: Least squares mean difference from baseline in FFbH at Month 18 (Month 18 minus BL)p-value: <0.0001Repeated measures analysis
Comparison: Least squares mean difference from baseline in FFbH at Month 21 (Month 21 minus BL)p-value: <0.0001Repeated measures analysis
Comparison: Least squares mean difference from baseline in FFbH at Month 24 (Month 24 minus BL)p-value: <0.0001Repeated measures analysis
Primary

Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) Score

The FACIT-F scale assesses self-reported fatigue and its impact upon daily activities and function. 13 items consisting of fatigue, weakness, listlessness, tiredness, trouble with starting things, trouble with finishing things, energy, activity, sleep, eating, help doing activities, frustration, and social activities are scored on a scale of 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much), except energy and activity which are reversed scored. Individual item scores are then summed to provide the final FACIT-F score with range from 0 (lowest) to 52 (highest quality of life). Increase from baseline in FACIT-F score signifies improvement.

Time frame: Baseline and Months 3, 6, 12, 18, 24

Population: The mITT population consists of all participants who were treated with Simponi® and have a baseline assessment and at least one additional visit, regardless of any protocol violations during the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Participants With Rheumatoid ArthritisChange From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) ScoreMonth 18 (n=167;212;216)5.05 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.99
Participants With Rheumatoid ArthritisChange From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) ScoreMonth 12 (n=215;242;243)4.81 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.91
Participants With Rheumatoid ArthritisChange From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) ScoreMonth 3 (n=344;356;368)2.85 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.79
Participants With Rheumatoid ArthritisChange From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) ScoreMonth 6 (n=264;311;300)3.71 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.85
Participants With Rheumatoid ArthritisChange From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) ScoreMonth 24 (n=162;196;211)5.99 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Participants With Psoriatic ArthritisChange From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) ScoreMonth 12 (n=215;242;243)5.62 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.93
Participants With Psoriatic ArthritisChange From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) ScoreMonth 3 (n=344;356;368)4.39 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.83
Participants With Psoriatic ArthritisChange From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) ScoreMonth 6 (n=264;311;300)4.40 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.86
Participants With Psoriatic ArthritisChange From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) ScoreMonth 18 (n=167;212;216)6.87 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.97
Participants With Psoriatic ArthritisChange From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) ScoreMonth 24 (n=162;196;211)5.94 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Participants With Ankylosing SpondylitisChange From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) ScoreMonth 24 (n=162;196;211)8.01 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.92
Participants With Ankylosing SpondylitisChange From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) ScoreMonth 18 (n=167;212;216)6.29 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.91
Participants With Ankylosing SpondylitisChange From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) ScoreMonth 3 (n=344;356;368)5.21 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.78
Participants With Ankylosing SpondylitisChange From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) ScoreMonth 12 (n=215;242;243)5.86 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.88
Participants With Ankylosing SpondylitisChange From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) ScoreMonth 6 (n=264;311;300)5.71 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.82
Comparison: Least squares mean difference from baseline in FACIT-F at Month 3 (Month 3 minus BL)p-value: 0.0003Repeated measures analysis
Comparison: Least squares mean difference from baseline in FACIT-F at Month 6 (Month 6 minus BL)p-value: <0.0001Repeated measures analysis
Comparison: Least squares mean difference from baseline in FACIT-F at Month 12 (Month 12 minus BL)p-value: <0.0001Repeated measures analysis
Comparison: Least squares mean difference from baseline in FACIT-F at Month 18 (Month 18 minus BL)p-value: <0.0001Repeated measures analysis
Comparison: Least squares mean difference from baseline in FACIT-F at Month 24 (Month 24 minus BL)p-value: <0.0001Repeated measures analysis
Comparison: Least squares mean difference from baseline in FACIT-F at Month 3 (Month 3 minus BL)p-value: <0.0001Repeated measures analysis
Comparison: Least squares mean difference from baseline in FACIT-F at Month 6 (Month 6 minus BL)p-value: <0.0001Repeated measures analysis
Comparison: Least squares mean difference from baseline in FACIT-F at Month 12 (Month 12 minus BL)p-value: <0.0001Repeated measures analysis
Comparison: Least squares mean difference from baseline in FACIT-F at Month 18 (Month 18 minus BL)p-value: <0.0001Repeated measures analysis
Comparison: Least squares mean difference from baseline in FACIT-F at Month 24 (Month 24 minus BL)p-value: <0.0001Repeated measures analysis
Comparison: Least squares mean difference from baseline in FACIT-F at Month 3 (Month 3 minus BL)p-value: <0.0001Repeated measures analysis
Comparison: Least squares mean difference from baseline in FACIT-F at Month 6 (Month 6 minus BL)p-value: <0.0001Repeated measures analysis
Comparison: Least squares mean difference from baseline in FACIT-F at Month 12 (Month 12 minus BL)p-value: <0.0001Repeated measures analysis
Comparison: Least squares mean difference from baseline in FACIT-F at Month 18 (Month 18 minus BL)p-value: <0.0001Repeated measures analysis
Comparison: Least squares mean difference from baseline in FACIT-F at Month 24 (Month 24 minus BL)p-value: <0.0001Repeated measures analysis
Primary

Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Disease Status

The CGI is a non-disease-specific evaluation of participants' overall health status assessed on a 10 mm visual analogue scale (VAS) ranging from 0 (free of complaints) to 10 (strong discomfort). The closer the score to 0, the better the health status.

Time frame: Baseline (BL; Month 0), Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, Month 12, Month 15, Month 18, Month 21, Month 24

Population: The mITT population consists of all participants who were treated with Simponi® and have a baseline assessment and at least one additional visit, regardless of any protocol violations during the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Participants With Rheumatoid ArthritisClinical Global Impression (CGI) Disease StatusMonth 152.5 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.89
Participants With Rheumatoid ArthritisClinical Global Impression (CGI) Disease StatusBL5.7 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.21
Participants With Rheumatoid ArthritisClinical Global Impression (CGI) Disease StatusMonth 33.4 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.27
Participants With Rheumatoid ArthritisClinical Global Impression (CGI) Disease StatusMonth 63.1 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.25
Participants With Rheumatoid ArthritisClinical Global Impression (CGI) Disease StatusMonth 92.7 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.99
Participants With Rheumatoid ArthritisClinical Global Impression (CGI) Disease StatusMonth 122.8 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.11
Participants With Rheumatoid ArthritisClinical Global Impression (CGI) Disease StatusMonth 182.4 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.97
Participants With Rheumatoid ArthritisClinical Global Impression (CGI) Disease StatusMonth 212.5 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.99
Participants With Rheumatoid ArthritisClinical Global Impression (CGI) Disease StatusMonth 242.2 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.84
Participants With Psoriatic ArthritisClinical Global Impression (CGI) Disease StatusMonth 122.4 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.01
Participants With Psoriatic ArthritisClinical Global Impression (CGI) Disease StatusMonth 182.2 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.86
Participants With Psoriatic ArthritisClinical Global Impression (CGI) Disease StatusBL5.5 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.17
Participants With Psoriatic ArthritisClinical Global Impression (CGI) Disease StatusMonth 212.1 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.84
Participants With Psoriatic ArthritisClinical Global Impression (CGI) Disease StatusMonth 152.3 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.96
Participants With Psoriatic ArthritisClinical Global Impression (CGI) Disease StatusMonth 33.2 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.25
Participants With Psoriatic ArthritisClinical Global Impression (CGI) Disease StatusMonth 92.6 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.07
Participants With Psoriatic ArthritisClinical Global Impression (CGI) Disease StatusMonth 242.1 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.95
Participants With Psoriatic ArthritisClinical Global Impression (CGI) Disease StatusMonth 62.8 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.19
Participants With Ankylosing SpondylitisClinical Global Impression (CGI) Disease StatusMonth 242.1 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.01
Participants With Ankylosing SpondylitisClinical Global Impression (CGI) Disease StatusMonth 92.4 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.87
Participants With Ankylosing SpondylitisClinical Global Impression (CGI) Disease StatusMonth 212.2 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.78
Participants With Ankylosing SpondylitisClinical Global Impression (CGI) Disease StatusMonth 122.3 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.94
Participants With Ankylosing SpondylitisClinical Global Impression (CGI) Disease StatusMonth 152.2 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.85
Participants With Ankylosing SpondylitisClinical Global Impression (CGI) Disease StatusMonth 62.5 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.09
Participants With Ankylosing SpondylitisClinical Global Impression (CGI) Disease StatusBL5.7 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.19
Participants With Ankylosing SpondylitisClinical Global Impression (CGI) Disease StatusMonth 182.2 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.91
Participants With Ankylosing SpondylitisClinical Global Impression (CGI) Disease StatusMonth 32.9 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.13
Primary

Number of Participants Who Experienced at Least One Adverse Event

An adverse event is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign including an abnormal laboratory finding, symptom or disease associated with the use of a medical treatment or procedure, regardless of whether it is considered related to the medical treatment or procedure.

Time frame: Up to 24 months

Population: The safety population consists of all participants with at least one injection of Simponi®.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Participants With Rheumatoid ArthritisNumber of Participants Who Experienced at Least One Adverse Event320 Participants
Participants With Psoriatic ArthritisNumber of Participants Who Experienced at Least One Adverse Event309 Participants
Participants With Ankylosing SpondylitisNumber of Participants Who Experienced at Least One Adverse Event281 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants Who Experienced at Least One Serious Adverse Event

A serious adverse event is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign including an abnormal laboratory finding, symptom or disease associated with the use of a medical treatment or procedure, regardless of whether it is considered related to the medical treatment or procedure that results in death, life-threatening adverse event, permanent or significant disability / unfitness for work, hospital treatment (i.e., admission to hospital) or prolongation of a patient's length of stay, or congenital deformity or birth defect.

Time frame: Up to 24 months

Population: The safety population consists of all participants with at least one injection of Simponi®.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Participants With Rheumatoid ArthritisNumber of Participants Who Experienced at Least One Serious Adverse Event75 Participants
Participants With Psoriatic ArthritisNumber of Participants Who Experienced at Least One Serious Adverse Event70 Participants
Participants With Ankylosing SpondylitisNumber of Participants Who Experienced at Least One Serious Adverse Event59 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 5, 2026