Skip to content

Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Apadenoson for Detection of Myocardial Perfusion Defects Using SPECT MPI

The ASPECT2 Trial: A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind Trial of Apadenoson for the Detection of Myocardial Perfusion Defects Using Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) Myocardial Perfusion Imaging (MPI)

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01313572
Acronym
ASPECT2
Enrollment
197
Registered
2011-03-11
Start date
2011-08-31
Completion date
2012-04-30
Last updated
2012-05-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Coronary Artery Disease

Keywords

Coronary Artery Disease, Myocardial Perfusion Imaging

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to see whether apadenoson is as effective as adenosine when used as a pharmacological stress agent in myocardial SPECT-imaging (SPECT-MPI)to detect defects in the supply of blood to the heart muscle (myocardial perfusion defects). The study will also look at whether apadenoson is better tolerated than adenosine when used in SPECT-MPI.

Detailed description

Adenosine is an effective vasodilator used in SPECT-Myocardial Perfusion Imaging (SPECT-MPI). However, it produces transient symptoms that are poorly tolerated by most subjects. This is a multi-center, randomized double-blind study to compare the tolerability and effectiveness of apadenoson to adenosine (Adenoscan®) in SPECT-MPI. Subjects who are clinical candidates for SPECT-MPI will be enrolled to undergo two sequential SPECT-MPI studies. The first study will use adenosine as the stress agent in approximately 1250 subjects. Eligible subjects will then be randomized in a 1:1 assignment ratio to receive a second SPECT-MPI using either adenosine or apadenoson as the pharmacologic stress agent, with the goal of obtaining a total of 670 subjects who complete both studies. The agreement of the results from the two adenosine:adenosine stress tests will be compared to that from the adenosine:apadenoson tests to assess efficacy. The incidence and intensity of commonly reported side effects will be compared to evaluate improved tolerability.

Interventions

Apadenoson single bolus IV injection 100 or 150 ug

Single IV infusion for 6 minutes at a rate of 140 µg/kg body weight per minute

Sponsors

PPD Development, LP
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Forest Laboratories
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Referred for a clinically indicated rest/pharmacologic stress SPECT-MPI test * High pretest probability (90% or greater) of CAD based on the ACC/AHA guidelines for relative risk, or past medical h/o CAD

Exclusion criteria

* Acute MI, new onset of ischemia or PCI within 30 days prior to SPECT-MPI at either Period 1 or Period 2; or CABG within 90 days prior to SPECT-MPI at either Period 1 or Period 2 * Active severe asthma or severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) which, in the Investigator's opinion, places the subject at risk for severe bronchoconstriction * History or evidence of clinically significant cardiac condition and rhythm disorder, in the absence of a functioning permanently implanted pacemaker * Hemodynamically significant valvular disease, outflow tract obstruction, or uncontrolled severe hypertension * Known history of cerebral vascular accident or suspected transient ischemic attack within 30 days prior to signed informed consent * Current significant medical, surgical, psychiatric, or other illness or pathology that could potentiate any adverse pharmacological event associated with an investigational drug

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Presence of myocardial perfusion defect based on SPECT-MPIUp to 2 hours after study drug administration in Period 1 and Period 2

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Incidence and subject rated intensity of most commonly reported side effects associated with use of adenosine compared to apadenoson in SPECT-MPIUp to 2 hours after administration of study drug in Period 2

Countries

Argentina, Belgium, Brazil, Netherlands, United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026