Nervous System Disorders
Conditions
Brief summary
The purpose of this research study is to assess the long term safety of Dysport® in hemiparetic subjects with upper limb spasticity due to stroke or traumatic brain injury over repeated treatment cycles.
Detailed description
This was a phase III, multicentre, prospective, open label, repeat treatment cycles, extension to the double study Y-52-52120-145 (Study 145) . The study included both rollover subjects from Study 145 and de novo subjects. The primary study objective was to assess the long term safety of Dysport® in hemiparetic subjects with upper limb spasticity due to stroke or traumatic brain injury over repeated treatment cycles. The secondary study objective was to assess the long term efficacy of repeated treatment with Dysport®.
Interventions
Dysport® was supplied to the study centres in vials containing 500 U of botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A). Depending on the dose administered up to 3 vials were required for the injection. Each vial was reconstituted with sodium chloride for injection (0.9%). A total volume of 5.0 mL of the reconstituted product was injected for Dysport® 500 U and 1000 U, and 7.5 mL was injected for Dysport® 1500 U.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Completion of the double blind study, Y-52-52120-145
Exclusion criteria
* Major limitation in the passive range of motion in upper limb
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Assessment of the Long-term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | Up to Week 52 | A TEAE was reported as emergent if it arose (i.e. started or worsened in severity) in the treatment phase after the subject received study medication. Adverse events of special interest (AESIs) were identified as those assessed as being due to remote spread of effect of Dysport®, or any adverse event (AE) that was assessed as a hypersensitivity reaction. TEAEs, AESIs, severe TEAEs, serious adverse events (SAEs), treatment related TEAEs, TEAEs leading to withdrawal and fatal SAEs are summarised by treatment cycle. |
| Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in Diastolic and Systolic Blood Pressure (BP) | Up to Week 52 | Systolic and diastolic BP were recorded at screening, baseline and at each post baseline visit. Vital signs were measured with the subject in a sitting position after resting for 3 minutes. Outcome measure is reported for number of subjects with data available for analysis. |
| Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in Heart Rate (HR) | Up to Week 52 | HR was recorded at screening, baseline and at each post baseline visit. Vital signs were measured with the subject in a sitting position after resting for 3 minutes. Outcome measure is reported for number of subjects with data available for analysis. |
| Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in Red Blood Cell (RBC) Count | Up to Week 52 | Blood samples for RBC count were taken at baseline, at post treatment follow up visit Week 4, and at end of study/early withdrawal. Outcome measure is reported for number of subjects with data available for analysis. |
| Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in Haemoglobin and Mean Corpuscular Haemoglobin Concentration (MCHC) | Up to Week 52 | Blood samples for haemoglobin and MCHC were taken at baseline, at post treatment follow up visit Week 4, and at the end of study/early withdrawal. Outcome measure is reported for number of subjects with data available for analysis. |
| Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in Haematocrit | Up to Week 52 | Blood samples for haematocrit were taken at baseline, at post treatment follow up visit Week 4, and at end of study/early withdrawal. Outcome measure is reported for number of subjects with data available for analysis. |
| Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in Mean Corpuscular Haemoglobin (MCH) | Up to Week 52 | Blood samples for MCH were taken at baseline, at post treatment follow up visit Week 4, and at end of study/early withdrawal. Outcome measure is reported for number of subjects with data available for analysis. |
| Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in Mean Corpuscular Volume (MCV) | Up to Week 52 | Blood samples for MCV were taken at baseline, at post treatment follow up visit Week 4, and at end of study/early withdrawal. Outcome measure is reported for number of subjects with data available for analysis. |
| Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in White Blood Cell (WBC) Count, Neutrophils, Lymphocytes and Platelets | Up to Week 52 | Blood samples for WBC count with differentials (neutrophils, lymphocytes) and platelet count were taken at baseline, at post treatment follow up visit Week 4, and at end of study or early withdrawal. |
| Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) | Up to Week 52 | 12-lead ECG tracing was performed at baseline, post treatment at Week 4 and at the end of study/early withdrawal visit. The 12-lead ECG recordings were performed at a paper speed of 25 mm/s, recorded with the subject in a supine position after 5 minutes rest. The ECG parameters reported were QRS duration, PR duration, QT duration, QTcB (QT interval corrected for HR according to Bazett), and QTcF (QT interval corrected for HR according to Fridericia) at baseline and the change to end of study/early withdrawal visit (EOS). |
| Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP), Gamma Glutamyl Transferase (GGT), Serum Glutamic Oxaloacetic Transaminase (SGOT) and Serum Glutamic Pyruvic Transaminase (SGPT) | Up to Week 52 | Blood samples for analysis of the following clinical chemistry parameters: ALP, GGT, SGOT and SGPT were taken at baseline, at post treatment follow up visit Week 4, and at end of study/early withdrawal. Outcome measure is reported for number of subjects with data available for analysis. |
| Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in Total Bilirubin and Creatinine | Up to Week 52 | Blood samples for clinical chemistry analysis of total bilirubin and creatinine were taken at baseline, at post treatment follow up visit Week 4, and at end of study/early withdrawal. Outcome measure is reported for number of subjects with data available for analysis. |
| Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN) and Fasting Blood Glucose | Up to Week 52 | Blood samples for analysis of BUN and fasting blood glucose levels were taken at baseline, at post treatment follow up visit Week 4, and at end of study/early withdrawal. |
| Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in 12 Lead ECG - HR | Up to Week 52 | HR was measured by 12-lead ECG tracing, performed at baseline, at post treatment follow up visit Week 4, and at the end of study or early withdrawal visit. The 12-lead ECG recordings were performed at a paper speed of 25 mm/s, recorded with the subject in a supine position after 5 minutes rest. |
| Number of Subjects With Botulinum Toxin A Binding and Neutralising Putative Antibodies | Up to Week 52 | Blood samples were collected at baseline, Week 4 of each cycle, and at the end of study/early withdrawal to test for the presence of Botulinum Toxin A Binding antibodies. Samples positive for the presence of binding antibodies were then analysed for the presence of neutralising putative antibodies. The number of subjects who were either positive (+ve) or negative (-ve) at baseline and then positive post baseline for binding or neutralising antibodies were reported. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Angle of Spasticity (X) in Elbow Flexors as PTMG | At Week 4 | The TS was used to measure spasticity in elbow flexors. The TS is administered by applying passive stretch to a muscle group at two velocities. Slow speed of muscle stretch measures the range of passive motion. During a slow stretching movement, the examiner determines the angle of movement arrest, either due to subject discomfort or a mechanical resistance. The same movement is repeated at high velocity (as fast as possible) to determine the angle of catch and release. The angle of movement arrest at slow velocity (XV1) and the angle of catch at fast speed (XV3) were recorded. The spasticity angle (X) was calculated as the difference between XV1 and XV3. Mean changes in Angles XV1, XV3 and X from baseline to Week 4 are reported. |
| Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Spasticity Grade (Y) in Elbow Flexors as PTMG | At Week 4 | The TS was used to measure spasticity in elbow flexors.The TS is administered by applying passive stretch to a muscle group. The spasticity grade (Y) assesses quality of muscle reaction on a 5-point scale (measured at fast speed): 0 =No resistance throughout passive movement, 1=slight resistance throughout passive movement, 2=clear catch at precise angle, interrupting passive movement, followed by release, 3=fatigable clonus (less than 10 seconds when maintaining pressure) occurring at a precise angle, followed by release. 4=unfatigable clonus (more than 10 seconds when maintaining pressure) occurring at precise angle. Mean changes in spasticity grade (Y) from baseline to Week 4 are reported. |
| Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Angle of Spasticity (X) in Wrist Flexors as PTMG | At Week 4 | The TS was used to measure spasticity in wrist flexors. The TS is administered by applying passive stretch to a muscle group at two velocities. Slow speed of muscle stretch measures the range of passive motion. During a slow stretching movement, the examiner determines the angle of movement arrest, either due to subject discomfort or a mechanical resistance. The same movement is repeated at high velocity (as fast as possible) to determine the angle of catch and release. The angle of movement arrest at slow velocity (XV1) and the angle of catch at fast speed (XV3) were recorded. The spasticity angle (X) was calculated as the difference between XV1 and XV3. Mean changes in Angles XV1, XV3 and X from baseline to Week 4 are reported. |
| Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Spasticity Grade (Y) in Wrist Flexors as PTMG | At Week 4 | The TS was used to measure spasticity in wrist flexors. The TS is administered by applying passive stretch to a muscle group. The spasticity grade (Y) assesses quality of muscle reaction on a 5-point scale (measured at fast speed): 0 =No resistance throughout passive movement, 1=slight resistance throughout passive movement, 2=clear catch at precise angle, interrupting passive movement, followed by release, 3=fatigable clonus (less than 10 seconds when maintaining pressure) occurring at a precise angle, followed by release. 4=unfatigable clonus (more than 10 seconds when maintaining pressure) occurring at precise angle. Mean changes in spasticity grade (Y) from baseline to Week 4 are reported. |
| Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Angle of Spasticity (X) in Shoulder Extensors | At Week 4 | The TS was used to measure spasticity in shoulder extensors. The TS is administered by applying passive stretch to a muscle group at two velocities. Slow speed of muscle stretch measures the range of passive motion. During a slow stretching movement, the examiner determines the angle of movement arrest, either due to subject discomfort or a mechanical resistance. The same movement is repeated at high velocity (as fast as possible) to determine the angle of catch and release. The angle of movement arrest at slow velocity (XV1) and the angle of catch at fast speed (XV3) were recorded. The spasticity angle (X) was calculated as the difference between XV1 and XV3. Mean changes in Angles XV1, XV3 and X from baseline to Week 4 are reported. |
| Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Spasticity Grade (Y) in Shoulder Extensors | At Week 4 | The TS was used to measure spasticity in shoulder extensors. The TS is administered by applying passive stretch to a muscle group. The spasticity grade (Y) assesses quality of muscle reaction on a 5-point scale (measured at fast speed): 0 =No resistance throughout passive movement, 1=slight resistance throughout passive movement, 2=clear catch at precise angle, interrupting passive movement, followed by release, 3=fatigable clonus (less than 10 seconds when maintaining pressure) occurring at a precise angle, followed by release. 4=unfatigable clonus (more than 10 seconds when maintaining pressure) occurring at precise angle. Mean changes in spasticity grade (Y) from baseline to Week 4 are reported. |
| Mean Change From Baseline in Active Range of Motion (AROM) at Week 4 in the 3 Possible PTMGs | At Week 4 | The AROM was assessed by the range of extension achieved by the subject moving each joint in the PTMGs (extrinsic finger flexors, elbow flexors and wrist flexors) without assistance. A goniometer was used for measurements in the elbow and wrist flexors but not for measurements in the extrinsic finger flexors. Mean changes in AROM in the 3 possible PTMGs from baseline to Week 4 are reported. |
| Mean Change From Baseline at Week 4 in Ease of Applying a Splint | At Week 4 | The ease of applying a splint was evaluated on a 6-point scale (0= no splint needed, -1= splint needed and applied with no difficulty, -2= splint needed and applied with mild difficulty, -3= splint needed and applied with moderate difficulty, -4= splint needed and applied with severe difficulty, -5= splint needed,but unable to apply). Mean change in ease of applying a splint from baseline to Week 4 was reported. |
| Mean Change From Baseline in Modified Frenchay Scale (MFS) at Week 4 | At Week 4 | The MFS was used to measure upper limb active function. Each subject was video taped while performing specific tasks. The videos were sent to a central provider and were read and scored by two independent readers blinded to the timing of the video and to treatment. These central assessments were used for the analysis of efficacy endpoints. The MFS consists of 10 tasks asking the subject to reach, grasp, carry and release different objects of different sizes which subjects are likely to use in their daily life. Each of these tasks was rated on a 10 point scale ranging from no movement to normal movement; for each task, the score 5 is used to rate a task barely accomplished. Mean change in MFS from baseline to Week 4 was reported. |
| Mean Change From Baseline in Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36) Quality of Life (QoL) at End of Study/Early Withdrawal Visit | Up to Week 52 | Subjects were asked to complete the SF-36 questionnaires prior to the study treatment at baseline and at the end of study/early withdrawal visit. The SF-36 is a generic non-preference based health status measure. This instrument assessed subject health across 8 variable dimensions, which are specific health domains such as physical functioning, social functioning and vitality. Each variable item score is coded and turned into a 0-100 scale where 0 indicates the worst and 100 indicates the best possible health state for both the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) of the questionnaire. Baseline results and the change from baseline to end of study/early withdrawal for the PCS and MCS are reported. |
| Mean Change From Baseline Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) in the Overall Primary Targeted Muscle Group (PTMG) for Upper Limb at Week 4 | At Week 4 | The clinical assessment of muscle tone was performed using the MAS. The MAS consists of 6 grades: 0, 1, 1+, 2, 3, or 4 that can be applied to muscles of both the upper and lower limbs. The MAS was applied by the rater by stretching the joint through its full available range over 1 second. The mean changes from baseline to Week 4 in MAS in the overall PTMG (finger, wrist or elbow flexors) are reported. |
| Mean Change From Baseline in European 5 Dimensions, 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) QoL at End of Study/Early Withdrawal Visit | Up to Week 52 | Subjects were asked to complete the EQ-5D-5L QoL questionnaires prior to the study treatment at baseline and at the end of study/early withdrawal visit. The EQ-5D-5L index is a generic preference based measure of health related QoL producing utility scores that represent subject preferences for particular health states. This instrument rated subject health state looking at 5 specific dimensions such as mobility, self-care, usual activity, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression and scored their general health state. Each dimension has 5 levels of severity (no problems, slight problems,moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems). In addition, a visual analogue scale (VAS) ranging from 0 to 100 was also included for the patients to summarize their overall health status, where 0 is the worst and 100 the best possible health state. The mean values for each dimension and the VAS scores at baseline and at the end of-study /early withdrawal are reported. |
| Percentage of Subjects With at Least 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in MAS for Overall PTMG | At Week 4 | The MAS consists of 6 grades: 0, 1, 1+, 2, 3, or 4 that can be applied to muscles of both the upper and lower limbs. The MAS was applied by the rater by stretching the joint through its full available range over 1 second. The percentage of subjects with at least a 1 grade reduction and at least a 2 grades reduction from baseline in mean MAS in the overall PTMG at Week 4 are reported. |
| Mean Change From Baseline MAS in the Extrinsic Finger Flexors at Week 4 | At Week 4 | The clinical assessment of muscle tone was performed using the MAS. The MAS consists of 6 grades: 0, 1, 1+, 2, 3, or 4 that can be applied to muscles of both the upper and lower limbs. The MAS was applied by the rater by stretching the joint through its full available range over 1 second. The mean changes from baseline to Week 4 in MAS in the extrinsic finger flexors are reported. |
| Percentage of Subjects With at Least 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in MAS for Extrinsic Finger Flexors at Week 4 | At Week 4 | The MAS consists of 6 grades: 0, 1, 1+, 2, 3, or 4 that can be applied to muscles of both the upper and lower limbs. The MAS was applied by the rater by stretching the joint through its full available range over 1 second. The percentage of subjects with at least a 1 grade reduction and at least a 2 grades reduction from baseline in mean MAS in the extrinsic finger flexors at Week 4 are reported. |
| Mean Change From Baseline MAS in the Wrist Flexors at Week 4 | At Week 4 | The clinical assessment of muscle tone was performed using the MAS. The MAS consists of 6 grades: 0, 1, 1+, 2, 3, or 4 that can be applied to muscles of both the upper and lower limbs. The MAS was applied by the rater by stretching the joint through its full available range over 1 second. The mean changes from baseline to Week 4 in MAS in the wrist flexors are reported. |
| Percentage of Subjects With at Least 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in MAS for Wrist Flexors at Week 4 | At Week 4 | The MAS consists of 6 grades: 0, 1, 1+, 2, 3, or 4 that can be applied to muscles of both the upper and lower limbs. The MAS was applied by the rater by stretching the joint through its full available range over 1 second. The percentage of subjects with at least a 1 grade reduction and at least a 2 grades reduction in mean MAS in the wrist flexors at Week 4 are reported. |
| Mean Change From Baseline MAS in the Elbow Flexors at Week 4 | At Week 4 | The clinical assessment of muscle tone was performed using the MAS. The MAS consists of 6 grades: 0, 1, 1+, 2, 3, or 4 that can be applied to muscles of both the upper and lower limbs. The MAS was applied by the rater by stretching the joint through its full available range over 1 second. The mean changes from baseline to Week 4 in MAS in the elbow flexors are reported. |
| Percentage of Subjects With at Least 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in MAS for Elbow Flexors at Week 4 | At Week 4 | The MAS consists of 6 grades: 0, 1, 1+, 2, 3, or 4 that can be applied to muscles of both the upper and lower limbs. The MAS was applied by the rater by stretching the joint through its full available range over 1 second. The percentage of subjects at least a 1 grade reduction and at least a 2 grades reduction from baseline in mean MAS in the elbow flexors at Week 4 are reported. |
| Mean Change From Baseline MAS in the Shoulder Extensors at Week 4 | At Week 4 | The clinical assessment of muscle tone was performed using the MAS. The MAS consists of 6 grades: 0, 1, 1+, 2, 3, or 4 that can be applied to muscles of both the upper and lower limbs. The MAS was applied by the rater by stretching the joint through its full available range over 1 second. The mean changes from baseline to Week 4 in MAS in the shoulder extensors are reported. |
| Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) of Treatment Response at Week 4 | At Week 4 | The PGA is a 9-point rating scale: -4=markedly worse, -3=much worse, -2=worse, -1=slightly worse, 0=no change, +1=slightly improved, +2=improved, +3=much improved, +4=markedly improved. An assessment of overall treatment response was conducted by the investigator and the mean PGA scores during long-term open label treatment with Dysport were reported. |
| Mean Change From Baseline in Disability Assessment Scale (DAS) Score for the Principal Target of Treatment (PTT) at Week 4 | At Week 4 | At baseline the subject and investigator together selected one of the four DAS domains as the PTT. The selected domain was required to have a rating of moderate or severe (≥2) at baseline. The DAS is a 4-point scale, the extent of functional impairment in 4 functional domains (dressing, hygiene, limb position and pain) was rated as follows: 0=no disability, 1=mild disability (noticeable but does not interfere significantly with normal activities), 2=moderate disability (normal activities require increased effort and/or assistance) and 3=severe disability (normal activities limited). The mean changes in DAS at Week 4 are reported. |
| Percentage of Subjects With at Least 1 Grade Reduction in DAS for PTT at Week 4 | At Week 4 | At baseline the subject and investigator together selected one of the four DAS domains as the PTT. The selected domain was required to have a rating of moderate or severe (≥2) at baseline. The DAS is a 4-point scale, the extent of functional impairment in 4 functional domains (dressing, hygiene, limb position and pain) was rated as follows: 0=no disability, 1=mild disability (noticeable but does not interfere significantly with normal activities), 2=moderate disability (normal activities require increased effort and/or assistance) and 3=severe disability (normal activities limited). The percentage of subjects with at least 1 grade reduction from baseline in DAS for PTT at Week 4 are reported. |
| Percentage of Subjects With at Least One Grade Reduction in DAS for Individual Domains at Week 4 | At Week 4 | The DAS is a 4-point scale. The extent of functional impairment in 4 functional domains (dressing, hygiene, limb position and pain) was rated as follows: 0=no disability, 1=mild disability (noticeable but does not interfere significantly with normal activities), 2=moderate disability (normal activities require increased effort and/or assistance) and 3=severe disability (normal activities limited). The percentage of subjects with at least one grade reduction in DAS for each of the individual domains at Week 4 is reported. |
| Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Angle of Spasticity (X) in Extrinsic Finger Flexors as PTMG | At Week 4 | The Tardieu Scale (TS) was used to measure spasticity in extrinsic finger flexors. The TS is administered by applying passive stretch to a muscle group at two velocities. Slow speed of muscle stretch measures the range of passive motion. During a slow stretching movement, the examiner determines the angle of movement arrest, either due to subject discomfort or a mechanical resistance. The same movement is repeated at high velocity (as fast as possible) to determine the angle of catch and release. The angle of movement arrest at slow velocity (XV1) and the angle of catch at fast speed (XV3) were recorded. The spasticity angle (X) was calculated as the difference between XV1 and XV3. Mean changes in Angles XV1, XV3 and X from baseline to Week 4 are reported. |
| Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Spasticity Grade (Y) in Extrinsic Finger Flexors as PTMG | At Week 4 | The TS was used to measure spasticity in extrinsic finger flexors. The TS is administered by applying passive stretch to a muscle group. The spasticity grade (Y) assesses quality of muscle reaction on a 5-point scale (measured at fast speed): 0 =No resistance throughout passive movement, 1=slight resistance throughout passive movement, 2=clear catch at precise angle, interrupting passive movement, followed by release, 3=fatigable clonus (less than 10 seconds when maintaining pressure) occurring at a precise angle, followed by release. 4=unfatigable clonus (more than 10 seconds when maintaining pressure) occurring at precise angle. Mean changes in spasticity grade (Y) from baseline to Week 4 are reported. |
Countries
Belgium, Czechia, France, Hungary, Italy, Poland, Russia, Slovakia, United States
Participant flow
Recruitment details
The study was designed as a multicentre study and included a total of 34 investigational sites in Belgium, the Czech Republic, France, Hungary, Italy, Poland, Russia, Slovakia and the United States of America (US) that included at least one subject. This study was an open label extension to the double blind Study 145 (Y-52-52120-145).
Pre-assignment details
Of 227 subjects who completed Study 145, 4 subjects entered an observational phase and never received treatment with Dysport® in this open label extension study (Study 148). The remaining 223 subjects were eligible for retreatment and progressed to Study 148. In addition, 31 of the 34 de novo subjects screened were included in this study.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Total Dysport® A total of 254 subjects in the open label study received between 1 and 5 i.m. injections of Dysport® according to their individual needs, for a period of up to 12 months.
All subjects were administered an appropriate dosage of Dysport® (1000 U or 500 U) on Day 1 of treatment Cycle 1. At each study visit from Week 12 onwards, subjects were assessed to determine whether a subsequent treatment cycle was required and treatment cycles were administered at intervals of a minimum of 12 weeks apart depending on the subject's safety and efficacy response.
From Cycle 2 onwards, a total dose of 1500 U could be administered in subjects requiring treatment with Dysport® in their shoulder and other upper limb muscles. Subjects who showed improvement in their upper limb during the first two treatment cycles were able to receive concomitant injections of Dysport® 500 U into at least one calf muscle, from Cycle 3 onwards as long as the total dose did not exceed 1500 U. | 254 |
| Total | 254 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Adverse Event | 5 |
| Overall Study | Did Not Receive Treatment with Dysport® | 4 |
| Overall Study | Investigator Decision | 1 |
| Overall Study | Lack of Efficacy | 3 |
| Overall Study | Observational Phase | 1 |
| Overall Study | Subject Withdrawn Early in Error | 4 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 18 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Total Dysport® |
|---|---|
| Age, Categorical <=18 years | 0 Participants |
| Age, Categorical >=65 years | 53 Participants |
| Age, Categorical Between 18 and 65 years | 201 Participants |
| Age, Continuous | 52.4 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 14 |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | 16 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | 238 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 7 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 27 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 2 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 218 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 91 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 163 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk |
|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 142 / 254 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 21 / 254 |
Outcome results
Assessment of the Long-term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
A TEAE was reported as emergent if it arose (i.e. started or worsened in severity) in the treatment phase after the subject received study medication. Adverse events of special interest (AESIs) were identified as those assessed as being due to remote spread of effect of Dysport®, or any adverse event (AE) that was assessed as a hypersensitivity reaction. TEAEs, AESIs, severe TEAEs, serious adverse events (SAEs), treatment related TEAEs, TEAEs leading to withdrawal and fatal SAEs are summarised by treatment cycle.
Time frame: Up to Week 52
Population: Subjects who entered the study and received at least one open label injection of Dysport® were evaluated for safety analysis. Only subjects with data available for analysis at the point of testing are reported.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total Dysport® | Assessment of the Long-term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | TEAEs: Cycle 1 | 102 Participants |
| Total Dysport® | Assessment of the Long-term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | TEAEs: Cycle 2 | 62 Participants |
| Total Dysport® | Assessment of the Long-term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | TEAEs: Cycle 3 | 47 Participants |
| Total Dysport® | Assessment of the Long-term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | TEAEs: Cycle 4 | 11 Participants |
| Total Dysport® | Assessment of the Long-term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | TEAEs: Cycle 5 | 2 Participants |
| Total Dysport® | Assessment of the Long-term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | Treatment related TEAE: Cycle 1 | 18 Participants |
| Total Dysport® | Assessment of the Long-term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | Treatment related TEAE: Cycle 2 | 8 Participants |
| Total Dysport® | Assessment of the Long-term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | Treatment related TEAE: Cycle 3 | 5 Participants |
| Total Dysport® | Assessment of the Long-term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | Treatment related TEAE: Cycle 4 | 2 Participants |
| Total Dysport® | Assessment of the Long-term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | Treatment related TEAE: Cycle 5 | 0 Participants |
| Total Dysport® | Assessment of the Long-term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | Severe TEAEs: Cycle 1 | 14 Participants |
| Total Dysport® | Assessment of the Long-term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | Severe TEAEs: Cycle 2 | 8 Participants |
| Total Dysport® | Assessment of the Long-term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | Severe TEAEs: Cycle 3 | 4 Participants |
| Total Dysport® | Assessment of the Long-term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | Severe TEAEs: Cycle 4 | 1 Participants |
| Total Dysport® | Assessment of the Long-term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | Severe TEAEs: Cycle 5 | 0 Participants |
| Total Dysport® | Assessment of the Long-term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | TEAEs Leading to Withdrawal: Cycle 1 | 2 Participants |
| Total Dysport® | Assessment of the Long-term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | TEAEs Leading to Withdrawal: Cycle 2 | 1 Participants |
| Total Dysport® | Assessment of the Long-term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | TEAEs Leading to Withdrawal: Cycle 3 | 2 Participants |
| Total Dysport® | Assessment of the Long-term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | TEAEs Leading to Withdrawal: Cycle 4 | 0 Participants |
| Total Dysport® | Assessment of the Long-term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | TEAEs Leading to Withdrawal: Cycle 5 | 0 Participants |
| Total Dysport® | Assessment of the Long-term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | AESIs: Cycle 1 | 2 Participants |
| Total Dysport® | Assessment of the Long-term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | AESIs: Cycle 2 | 0 Participants |
| Total Dysport® | Assessment of the Long-term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | AESIs: Cycle 3 | 0 Participants |
| Total Dysport® | Assessment of the Long-term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | AESIs: Cycle 4 | 0 Participants |
| Total Dysport® | Assessment of the Long-term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | AESIs: Cycle 5 | 0 Participants |
| Total Dysport® | Assessment of the Long-term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | SAEs: Cycle 1 | 10 Participants |
| Total Dysport® | Assessment of the Long-term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | SAEs: Cycle 2 | 6 Participants |
| Total Dysport® | Assessment of the Long-term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | SAEs: Cycle 3 | 6 Participants |
| Total Dysport® | Assessment of the Long-term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | SAEs: Cycle 4 | 1 Participants |
| Total Dysport® | Assessment of the Long-term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | SAEs: Cycle 5 | 0 Participants |
| Total Dysport® | Assessment of the Long-term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | Fatal SAEs: Cycle 1 | 1 Participants |
| Total Dysport® | Assessment of the Long-term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | Fatal SAEs: Cycle 2 | 1 Participants |
| Total Dysport® | Assessment of the Long-term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | Fatal SAEs: Cycle 3 | 1 Participants |
| Total Dysport® | Assessment of the Long-term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | Fatal SAEs: Cycle 4 | 0 Participants |
| Total Dysport® | Assessment of the Long-term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | Fatal SAEs: Cycle 5 | 0 Participants |
Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in 12 Lead ECG - HR
HR was measured by 12-lead ECG tracing, performed at baseline, at post treatment follow up visit Week 4, and at the end of study or early withdrawal visit. The 12-lead ECG recordings were performed at a paper speed of 25 mm/s, recorded with the subject in a supine position after 5 minutes rest.
Time frame: Up to Week 52
Population: The ECG analysis was performed in the safety population among subjects who had at least one ECG measurement before injection and at least one ECG after injection. Only subjects with data available for analysis at the point of testing are reported.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in 12 Lead ECG - HR | Baseline | 68.2 bpm | Standard Deviation 11.3 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in 12 Lead ECG - HR | Change from Baseline to EOS | 2.7 bpm | Standard Deviation 10.5 |
Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG)
12-lead ECG tracing was performed at baseline, post treatment at Week 4 and at the end of study/early withdrawal visit. The 12-lead ECG recordings were performed at a paper speed of 25 mm/s, recorded with the subject in a supine position after 5 minutes rest. The ECG parameters reported were QRS duration, PR duration, QT duration, QTcB (QT interval corrected for HR according to Bazett), and QTcF (QT interval corrected for HR according to Fridericia) at baseline and the change to end of study/early withdrawal visit (EOS).
Time frame: Up to Week 52
Population: The ECG analysis was performed in the safety population among subjects who had at least one ECG measurement before injection and at least one ECG after injection. Only subjects with data available for analysis at the point of testing are reported.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) | QT Duration - Baseline | 403.6 milliseconds (ms) | Standard Deviation 31.9 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) | QT Duration - Change from Baseline to EOS | -6.3 milliseconds (ms) | Standard Deviation 22.1 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) | QTcF - Baseline | 417.8 milliseconds (ms) | Standard Deviation 22.9 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) | QTcF - Change from Baseline to EOS | -1 milliseconds (ms) | Standard Deviation 15.5 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) | QTcB - Baseline | 425.6 milliseconds (ms) | Standard Deviation 25.5 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) | QTcB - Change from Baseline to EOS | 1.9 milliseconds (ms) | Standard Deviation 20.2 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) | QRS Duration - Baseline | 94.9 milliseconds (ms) | Standard Deviation 15.3 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) | QRS Duration - Change from Baseline to EOS | -0.4 milliseconds (ms) | Standard Deviation 6.4 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) | PR Duration - Baseline | 165.6 milliseconds (ms) | Standard Deviation 25.4 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) | PR Duration - Change from Baseline to EOS | -0.3 milliseconds (ms) | Standard Deviation 13.2 |
Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP), Gamma Glutamyl Transferase (GGT), Serum Glutamic Oxaloacetic Transaminase (SGOT) and Serum Glutamic Pyruvic Transaminase (SGPT)
Blood samples for analysis of the following clinical chemistry parameters: ALP, GGT, SGOT and SGPT were taken at baseline, at post treatment follow up visit Week 4, and at end of study/early withdrawal. Outcome measure is reported for number of subjects with data available for analysis.
Time frame: Up to Week 52
Population: Subjects who entered the study and received at least one open label injection of Dysport® were evaluated for safety analysis. Only subjects with data available for analysis at the point of testing are reported.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP), Gamma Glutamyl Transferase (GGT), Serum Glutamic Oxaloacetic Transaminase (SGOT) and Serum Glutamic Pyruvic Transaminase (SGPT) | ALP | -0.6 International Unit/L (IU/L) |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP), Gamma Glutamyl Transferase (GGT), Serum Glutamic Oxaloacetic Transaminase (SGOT) and Serum Glutamic Pyruvic Transaminase (SGPT) | SGOT | 1.4 International Unit/L (IU/L) |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP), Gamma Glutamyl Transferase (GGT), Serum Glutamic Oxaloacetic Transaminase (SGOT) and Serum Glutamic Pyruvic Transaminase (SGPT) | SGPT | 1.2 International Unit/L (IU/L) |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP), Gamma Glutamyl Transferase (GGT), Serum Glutamic Oxaloacetic Transaminase (SGOT) and Serum Glutamic Pyruvic Transaminase (SGPT) | GGT | 1.5 International Unit/L (IU/L) |
Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN) and Fasting Blood Glucose
Blood samples for analysis of BUN and fasting blood glucose levels were taken at baseline, at post treatment follow up visit Week 4, and at end of study/early withdrawal.
Time frame: Up to Week 52
Population: Subjects who entered the study and received at least one open label injection of Dysport® were evaluated for safety analysis. Only subjects with data available for analysis at the point of testing are reported.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN) and Fasting Blood Glucose | BUN | -0.033 millimoles(mmol)/L |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN) and Fasting Blood Glucose | Fasting Blood Glucose | 0.132 millimoles(mmol)/L |
Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in Diastolic and Systolic Blood Pressure (BP)
Systolic and diastolic BP were recorded at screening, baseline and at each post baseline visit. Vital signs were measured with the subject in a sitting position after resting for 3 minutes. Outcome measure is reported for number of subjects with data available for analysis.
Time frame: Up to Week 52
Population: Subjects who entered the study and received at least one open label injection of Dysport® were evaluated for safety analysis. Only subjects with data available for analysis at the point of testing are reported.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in Diastolic and Systolic Blood Pressure (BP) | Diastolic BP | 0 Millimeters of Mercury (mm Hg) |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in Diastolic and Systolic Blood Pressure (BP) | Systolic BP | -2.8 Millimeters of Mercury (mm Hg) |
Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in Haematocrit
Blood samples for haematocrit were taken at baseline, at post treatment follow up visit Week 4, and at end of study/early withdrawal. Outcome measure is reported for number of subjects with data available for analysis.
Time frame: Up to Week 52
Population: Subjects who entered the study and received at least one open label injection of Dysport® were evaluated for safety analysis. Only subjects with data available for analysis at the point of testing are reported.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in Haematocrit | -0.0011 percentage of RBC in blood |
Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in Haemoglobin and Mean Corpuscular Haemoglobin Concentration (MCHC)
Blood samples for haemoglobin and MCHC were taken at baseline, at post treatment follow up visit Week 4, and at the end of study/early withdrawal. Outcome measure is reported for number of subjects with data available for analysis.
Time frame: Up to Week 52
Population: Subjects who entered the study and received at least one open label injection of Dysport® were evaluated for safety analysis. Only subjects with data available for analysis at the point of testing are reported.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in Haemoglobin and Mean Corpuscular Haemoglobin Concentration (MCHC) | Haemoglobin | -0.7 grams(g)/L |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in Haemoglobin and Mean Corpuscular Haemoglobin Concentration (MCHC) | MCHC | -0.8 grams(g)/L |
Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in Heart Rate (HR)
HR was recorded at screening, baseline and at each post baseline visit. Vital signs were measured with the subject in a sitting position after resting for 3 minutes. Outcome measure is reported for number of subjects with data available for analysis.
Time frame: Up to Week 52
Population: Subjects who entered the study and received at least one open label injection of Dysport® were evaluated for safety analysis. Only subjects with data available for analysis at the point of testing are reported.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in Heart Rate (HR) | 2.5 Beats per minute (bpm) |
Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in Mean Corpuscular Haemoglobin (MCH)
Blood samples for MCH were taken at baseline, at post treatment follow up visit Week 4, and at end of study/early withdrawal. Outcome measure is reported for number of subjects with data available for analysis.
Time frame: Up to Week 52
Population: Subjects who entered the study and received at least one open label injection of Dysport® were evaluated for safety analysis. Only subjects with data available for analysis at the point of testing are reported.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in Mean Corpuscular Haemoglobin (MCH) | -0.33 picograms (pg) |
Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in Mean Corpuscular Volume (MCV)
Blood samples for MCV were taken at baseline, at post treatment follow up visit Week 4, and at end of study/early withdrawal. Outcome measure is reported for number of subjects with data available for analysis.
Time frame: Up to Week 52
Population: Subjects who entered the study and received at least one open label injection of Dysport® were evaluated for safety analysis. Only subjects with data available for analysis at the point of testing are reported.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in Mean Corpuscular Volume (MCV) | -0.77 femtoliters (fL) |
Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in Red Blood Cell (RBC) Count
Blood samples for RBC count were taken at baseline, at post treatment follow up visit Week 4, and at end of study/early withdrawal. Outcome measure is reported for number of subjects with data available for analysis.
Time frame: Up to Week 52
Population: Subjects who entered the study and received at least one open label injection of Dysport® were evaluated for safety analysis. Only subjects with data available for analysis at the point of testing are reported.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in Red Blood Cell (RBC) Count | 0.03 Tera cells/Litre (L) |
Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in Total Bilirubin and Creatinine
Blood samples for clinical chemistry analysis of total bilirubin and creatinine were taken at baseline, at post treatment follow up visit Week 4, and at end of study/early withdrawal. Outcome measure is reported for number of subjects with data available for analysis.
Time frame: Up to Week 52
Population: Subjects who entered the study and received at least one open label injection of Dysport® were evaluated for safety analysis. Only subjects with data available for analysis at the point of testing are reported.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in Total Bilirubin and Creatinine | Total Bilirubin | -0.27 Micromole/L (μmol/L) |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in Total Bilirubin and Creatinine | Creatinine | -3.7 Micromole/L (μmol/L) |
Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in White Blood Cell (WBC) Count, Neutrophils, Lymphocytes and Platelets
Blood samples for WBC count with differentials (neutrophils, lymphocytes) and platelet count were taken at baseline, at post treatment follow up visit Week 4, and at end of study or early withdrawal.
Time frame: Up to Week 52
Population: Subjects who entered the study and received at least one open label injection of Dysport® were evaluated for safety analysis. Only subjects with data available for analysis at the point of testing are reported.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in White Blood Cell (WBC) Count, Neutrophils, Lymphocytes and Platelets | WBC count | 0.04 Giga cells/L |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in White Blood Cell (WBC) Count, Neutrophils, Lymphocytes and Platelets | Neutrophils | 0 Giga cells/L |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in White Blood Cell (WBC) Count, Neutrophils, Lymphocytes and Platelets | Lymphocytes | 0.01 Giga cells/L |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in White Blood Cell (WBC) Count, Neutrophils, Lymphocytes and Platelets | Platelets | 3.2 Giga cells/L |
Number of Subjects With Botulinum Toxin A Binding and Neutralising Putative Antibodies
Blood samples were collected at baseline, Week 4 of each cycle, and at the end of study/early withdrawal to test for the presence of Botulinum Toxin A Binding antibodies. Samples positive for the presence of binding antibodies were then analysed for the presence of neutralising putative antibodies. The number of subjects who were either positive (+ve) or negative (-ve) at baseline and then positive post baseline for binding or neutralising antibodies were reported.
Time frame: Up to Week 52
Population: Binding and neutralising antibodies were evaluated at baseline for all 258 subjects (rollover and de novo) enrolled in Study 148. Only subjects with data available for analysis at the point of testing are reported.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total Dysport® | Number of Subjects With Botulinum Toxin A Binding and Neutralising Putative Antibodies | Binding +ve at baseline | 5 Participants |
| Total Dysport® | Number of Subjects With Botulinum Toxin A Binding and Neutralising Putative Antibodies | Binding -ve at baseline & +ve post baseline | 20 Participants |
| Total Dysport® | Number of Subjects With Botulinum Toxin A Binding and Neutralising Putative Antibodies | Neutralising +ve at baseline | 4 Participants |
| Total Dysport® | Number of Subjects With Botulinum Toxin A Binding and Neutralising Putative Antibodies | Neutralising -ve at baseline & +ve post baseline | 11 Participants |
Mean Change From Baseline at Week 4 in Ease of Applying a Splint
The ease of applying a splint was evaluated on a 6-point scale (0= no splint needed, -1= splint needed and applied with no difficulty, -2= splint needed and applied with mild difficulty, -3= splint needed and applied with moderate difficulty, -4= splint needed and applied with severe difficulty, -5= splint needed,but unable to apply). Mean change in ease of applying a splint from baseline to Week 4 was reported.
Time frame: At Week 4
Population: The ITT population was defined as all enrolled subjects who received at least one injection of study medication in this open label extension study. Too few subjects were treated in Cycle 5 to allow direct comparisons with other cycles and are not reported. Only subjects with data available for analysis at the point of testing are reported.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline at Week 4 in Ease of Applying a Splint | Cycle 1 | -0.4 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.1 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline at Week 4 in Ease of Applying a Splint | Cycle 2 | -0.4 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.3 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline at Week 4 in Ease of Applying a Splint | Cycle 3 | -0.4 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.4 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline at Week 4 in Ease of Applying a Splint | Cycle 4 | -0.4 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1 |
Mean Change From Baseline in Active Range of Motion (AROM) at Week 4 in the 3 Possible PTMGs
The AROM was assessed by the range of extension achieved by the subject moving each joint in the PTMGs (extrinsic finger flexors, elbow flexors and wrist flexors) without assistance. A goniometer was used for measurements in the elbow and wrist flexors but not for measurements in the extrinsic finger flexors. Mean changes in AROM in the 3 possible PTMGs from baseline to Week 4 are reported.
Time frame: At Week 4
Population: The ITT population was defined as all enrolled subjects who received at least one injection of study medication in this open label extension study. Too few subjects were treated in Cycle 5 to allow direct comparisons with other cycles and are not reported. Only subjects with data available for analysis at the point of testing are reported.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline in Active Range of Motion (AROM) at Week 4 in the 3 Possible PTMGs | Extrinsic Finger Flexors: Cycle 1 | 31.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 40.9 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline in Active Range of Motion (AROM) at Week 4 in the 3 Possible PTMGs | Extrinsic Finger Flexors: Cycle 2 | 34.4 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 45 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline in Active Range of Motion (AROM) at Week 4 in the 3 Possible PTMGs | Extrinsic Finger Flexors: Cycle 3 | 33.5 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 47.1 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline in Active Range of Motion (AROM) at Week 4 in the 3 Possible PTMGs | Extrinsic Finger Flexors: Cycle 4 | 38 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 53.4 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline in Active Range of Motion (AROM) at Week 4 in the 3 Possible PTMGs | Elbow Flexors: Cycle 1 | 10.7 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 25.5 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline in Active Range of Motion (AROM) at Week 4 in the 3 Possible PTMGs | Elbow Flexors: Cycle 2 | 17.6 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 23.3 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline in Active Range of Motion (AROM) at Week 4 in the 3 Possible PTMGs | Elbow Flexors: Cycle 3 | 14.5 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 24.1 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline in Active Range of Motion (AROM) at Week 4 in the 3 Possible PTMGs | Elbow Flexors: Cycle 4 | 13.6 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.6 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline in Active Range of Motion (AROM) at Week 4 in the 3 Possible PTMGs | Wrist Flexors: Cycle 1 | 17.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 28.6 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline in Active Range of Motion (AROM) at Week 4 in the 3 Possible PTMGs | Wrist Flexors: Cycle 2 | 23 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 32.7 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline in Active Range of Motion (AROM) at Week 4 in the 3 Possible PTMGs | Wrist Flexors: Cycle 3 | 22 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 30.9 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline in Active Range of Motion (AROM) at Week 4 in the 3 Possible PTMGs | Wrist Flexors: Cycle 4 | 3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 25.1 |
Mean Change From Baseline in Disability Assessment Scale (DAS) Score for the Principal Target of Treatment (PTT) at Week 4
At baseline the subject and investigator together selected one of the four DAS domains as the PTT. The selected domain was required to have a rating of moderate or severe (≥2) at baseline. The DAS is a 4-point scale, the extent of functional impairment in 4 functional domains (dressing, hygiene, limb position and pain) was rated as follows: 0=no disability, 1=mild disability (noticeable but does not interfere significantly with normal activities), 2=moderate disability (normal activities require increased effort and/or assistance) and 3=severe disability (normal activities limited). The mean changes in DAS at Week 4 are reported.
Time frame: At Week 4
Population: The ITT population was defined as all enrolled subjects who received at least one injection of study medication in this open label extension study. Too few subjects were treated in Cycle 5 to allow direct comparisons with other cycles and are not reported. Only subjects with data available for analysis at the point of testing are reported.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline in Disability Assessment Scale (DAS) Score for the Principal Target of Treatment (PTT) at Week 4 | Cycle 1 | -0.9 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.8 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline in Disability Assessment Scale (DAS) Score for the Principal Target of Treatment (PTT) at Week 4 | Cycle 2 | -1.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.8 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline in Disability Assessment Scale (DAS) Score for the Principal Target of Treatment (PTT) at Week 4 | Cycle 3 | -1.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.8 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline in Disability Assessment Scale (DAS) Score for the Principal Target of Treatment (PTT) at Week 4 | Cycle 4 | -1.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.8 |
Mean Change From Baseline in European 5 Dimensions, 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) QoL at End of Study/Early Withdrawal Visit
Subjects were asked to complete the EQ-5D-5L QoL questionnaires prior to the study treatment at baseline and at the end of study/early withdrawal visit. The EQ-5D-5L index is a generic preference based measure of health related QoL producing utility scores that represent subject preferences for particular health states. This instrument rated subject health state looking at 5 specific dimensions such as mobility, self-care, usual activity, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression and scored their general health state. Each dimension has 5 levels of severity (no problems, slight problems,moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems). In addition, a visual analogue scale (VAS) ranging from 0 to 100 was also included for the patients to summarize their overall health status, where 0 is the worst and 100 the best possible health state. The mean values for each dimension and the VAS scores at baseline and at the end of-study /early withdrawal are reported.
Time frame: Up to Week 52
Population: The ITT population was defined as all enrolled subjects who received at least one injection of study medication in this open label extension study. Too few subjects were treated in Cycle 5 to allow direct comparisons with other cycles and are not reported. Only subjects with data available for analysis at the point of testing are reported.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline in European 5 Dimensions, 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) QoL at End of Study/Early Withdrawal Visit | Anxiety/Depression Baseline | 1.9 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.9 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline in European 5 Dimensions, 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) QoL at End of Study/Early Withdrawal Visit | Anxiety/Depression Change | -0.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.9 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline in European 5 Dimensions, 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) QoL at End of Study/Early Withdrawal Visit | Mobility Baseline | 2.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.9 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline in European 5 Dimensions, 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) QoL at End of Study/Early Withdrawal Visit | Mobility Change | 0 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.8 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline in European 5 Dimensions, 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) QoL at End of Study/Early Withdrawal Visit | Pain/Discomfort Baseline | 2.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline in European 5 Dimensions, 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) QoL at End of Study/Early Withdrawal Visit | Pain/Discomfort Change | -0.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.9 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline in European 5 Dimensions, 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) QoL at End of Study/Early Withdrawal Visit | Self-Care Baseline | 2.4 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline in European 5 Dimensions, 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) QoL at End of Study/Early Withdrawal Visit | Self-Care Change | 0 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.8 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline in European 5 Dimensions, 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) QoL at End of Study/Early Withdrawal Visit | Usual Activities Baseline | 2.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline in European 5 Dimensions, 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) QoL at End of Study/Early Withdrawal Visit | Usual Activities Change | -0.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline in European 5 Dimensions, 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) QoL at End of Study/Early Withdrawal Visit | VAS Baseline | 63.6 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.7 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline in European 5 Dimensions, 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) QoL at End of Study/Early Withdrawal Visit | VAS Change | 2.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 19 |
Mean Change From Baseline in Modified Frenchay Scale (MFS) at Week 4
The MFS was used to measure upper limb active function. Each subject was video taped while performing specific tasks. The videos were sent to a central provider and were read and scored by two independent readers blinded to the timing of the video and to treatment. These central assessments were used for the analysis of efficacy endpoints. The MFS consists of 10 tasks asking the subject to reach, grasp, carry and release different objects of different sizes which subjects are likely to use in their daily life. Each of these tasks was rated on a 10 point scale ranging from no movement to normal movement; for each task, the score 5 is used to rate a task barely accomplished. Mean change in MFS from baseline to Week 4 was reported.
Time frame: At Week 4
Population: The ITT population was defined as all enrolled subjects who received at least one injection of study medication in this open label extension study. Too few subjects were treated in Cycle 5 to allow direct comparisons with other cycles and are not reported. Only subjects with data available for analysis at the point of testing are reported.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline in Modified Frenchay Scale (MFS) at Week 4 | Cycle 1 | 0.4 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.77 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline in Modified Frenchay Scale (MFS) at Week 4 | Cycle 2 | 0.51 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.8 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline in Modified Frenchay Scale (MFS) at Week 4 | Cycle 3 | 0.44 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.82 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline in Modified Frenchay Scale (MFS) at Week 4 | Cycle 4 | 0.4 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.75 |
Mean Change From Baseline in Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36) Quality of Life (QoL) at End of Study/Early Withdrawal Visit
Subjects were asked to complete the SF-36 questionnaires prior to the study treatment at baseline and at the end of study/early withdrawal visit. The SF-36 is a generic non-preference based health status measure. This instrument assessed subject health across 8 variable dimensions, which are specific health domains such as physical functioning, social functioning and vitality. Each variable item score is coded and turned into a 0-100 scale where 0 indicates the worst and 100 indicates the best possible health state for both the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) of the questionnaire. Baseline results and the change from baseline to end of study/early withdrawal for the PCS and MCS are reported.
Time frame: Up to Week 52
Population: The ITT population was defined as all enrolled subjects who received at least one injection of study medication in this open label extension study. Too few subjects were treated in Cycle 5 to allow direct comparisons with other cycles and are not reported. Only subjects with data available for analysis at the point of testing are reported.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline in Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36) Quality of Life (QoL) at End of Study/Early Withdrawal Visit | PCS Baseline | 37.49 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.94 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline in Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36) Quality of Life (QoL) at End of Study/Early Withdrawal Visit | PCS Change | 1.07 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.76 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline in Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36) Quality of Life (QoL) at End of Study/Early Withdrawal Visit | MCS Baseline | 46.88 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 13.09 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline in Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36) Quality of Life (QoL) at End of Study/Early Withdrawal Visit | MCS Change | 0.96 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.11 |
Mean Change From Baseline MAS in the Elbow Flexors at Week 4
The clinical assessment of muscle tone was performed using the MAS. The MAS consists of 6 grades: 0, 1, 1+, 2, 3, or 4 that can be applied to muscles of both the upper and lower limbs. The MAS was applied by the rater by stretching the joint through its full available range over 1 second. The mean changes from baseline to Week 4 in MAS in the elbow flexors are reported.
Time frame: At Week 4
Population: The ITT population was defined as all enrolled subjects who received at least one injection of study medication in this open label extension study. Too few subjects were treated in Cycle 5 to allow direct comparisons with other cycles and are not reported. Only subjects with data available for analysis at the point of testing are reported.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline MAS in the Elbow Flexors at Week 4 | Cycle 1 | -1.0 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline MAS in the Elbow Flexors at Week 4 | Cycle 2 | -1.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.1 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline MAS in the Elbow Flexors at Week 4 | Cycle 3 | -1.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.1 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline MAS in the Elbow Flexors at Week 4 | Cycle 4 | -0.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1 |
Mean Change From Baseline MAS in the Extrinsic Finger Flexors at Week 4
The clinical assessment of muscle tone was performed using the MAS. The MAS consists of 6 grades: 0, 1, 1+, 2, 3, or 4 that can be applied to muscles of both the upper and lower limbs. The MAS was applied by the rater by stretching the joint through its full available range over 1 second. The mean changes from baseline to Week 4 in MAS in the extrinsic finger flexors are reported.
Time frame: At Week 4
Population: The ITT population was defined as all enrolled subjects who received at least one injection of study medication in this open label extension study. Too few subjects were treated in Cycle 5 to allow direct comparisons with other cycles and are not reported. Only subjects with data available for analysis at the point of testing are reported.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline MAS in the Extrinsic Finger Flexors at Week 4 | Cycle 1 | -1.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.1 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline MAS in the Extrinsic Finger Flexors at Week 4 | Cycle 2 | -1.5 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.2 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline MAS in the Extrinsic Finger Flexors at Week 4 | Cycle 3 | -1.5 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.3 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline MAS in the Extrinsic Finger Flexors at Week 4 | Cycle 4 | -1.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.2 |
Mean Change From Baseline MAS in the Shoulder Extensors at Week 4
The clinical assessment of muscle tone was performed using the MAS. The MAS consists of 6 grades: 0, 1, 1+, 2, 3, or 4 that can be applied to muscles of both the upper and lower limbs. The MAS was applied by the rater by stretching the joint through its full available range over 1 second. The mean changes from baseline to Week 4 in MAS in the shoulder extensors are reported.
Time frame: At Week 4
Population: The ITT population was defined as all enrolled subjects who received at least one injection of study medication in this open label extension study. Too few subjects were treated in Cycle 5 to allow direct comparisons with other cycles and are not reported. Only subjects with data available for analysis at the point of testing are reported.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline MAS in the Shoulder Extensors at Week 4 | Cycle 1 | -0.9 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.1 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline MAS in the Shoulder Extensors at Week 4 | Cycle 2 | -0.7 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.9 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline MAS in the Shoulder Extensors at Week 4 | Cycle 3 | -0.6 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline MAS in the Shoulder Extensors at Week 4 | Cycle 4 | -0.6 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.8 |
Mean Change From Baseline MAS in the Wrist Flexors at Week 4
The clinical assessment of muscle tone was performed using the MAS. The MAS consists of 6 grades: 0, 1, 1+, 2, 3, or 4 that can be applied to muscles of both the upper and lower limbs. The MAS was applied by the rater by stretching the joint through its full available range over 1 second. The mean changes from baseline to Week 4 in MAS in the wrist flexors are reported.
Time frame: At Week 4
Population: The ITT population was defined as all enrolled subjects who received at least one injection of study medication in this open label extension study. Too few subjects were treated in Cycle 5 to allow direct comparisons with other cycles and are not reported. Only subjects with data available for analysis at the point of testing are reported.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline MAS in the Wrist Flexors at Week 4 | Cycle 1 | -1.5 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.2 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline MAS in the Wrist Flexors at Week 4 | Cycle 2 | -1.6 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.3 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline MAS in the Wrist Flexors at Week 4 | Cycle 3 | -1.6 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.3 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline MAS in the Wrist Flexors at Week 4 | Cycle 4 | -1.5 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.2 |
Mean Change From Baseline Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) in the Overall Primary Targeted Muscle Group (PTMG) for Upper Limb at Week 4
The clinical assessment of muscle tone was performed using the MAS. The MAS consists of 6 grades: 0, 1, 1+, 2, 3, or 4 that can be applied to muscles of both the upper and lower limbs. The MAS was applied by the rater by stretching the joint through its full available range over 1 second. The mean changes from baseline to Week 4 in MAS in the overall PTMG (finger, wrist or elbow flexors) are reported.
Time frame: At Week 4
Population: The Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population was all enrolled subjects who received at least one injection of study medication in this open label extension study. Too few subjects were treated in Cycle 5 to allow direct comparisons with other cycles and are not reported. Only subjects with data available for analysis at the point of testing are reported.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) in the Overall Primary Targeted Muscle Group (PTMG) for Upper Limb at Week 4 | Cycle 1 | -1.4 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.1 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) in the Overall Primary Targeted Muscle Group (PTMG) for Upper Limb at Week 4 | Cycle 2 | -1.6 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.2 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) in the Overall Primary Targeted Muscle Group (PTMG) for Upper Limb at Week 4 | Cycle 3 | -1.5 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.1 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) in the Overall Primary Targeted Muscle Group (PTMG) for Upper Limb at Week 4 | Cycle 4 | -1.4 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.1 |
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Angle of Spasticity (X) in Elbow Flexors as PTMG
The TS was used to measure spasticity in elbow flexors. The TS is administered by applying passive stretch to a muscle group at two velocities. Slow speed of muscle stretch measures the range of passive motion. During a slow stretching movement, the examiner determines the angle of movement arrest, either due to subject discomfort or a mechanical resistance. The same movement is repeated at high velocity (as fast as possible) to determine the angle of catch and release. The angle of movement arrest at slow velocity (XV1) and the angle of catch at fast speed (XV3) were recorded. The spasticity angle (X) was calculated as the difference between XV1 and XV3. Mean changes in Angles XV1, XV3 and X from baseline to Week 4 are reported.
Time frame: At Week 4
Population: The ITT population was defined as all enrolled subjects who received at least one injection of study medication in this open label extension study. Too few subjects were treated in Cycle 5 to allow direct comparisons with other cycles and are not reported. Only subjects with data available for analysis at the point of testing are reported.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Angle of Spasticity (X) in Elbow Flexors as PTMG | Angle of Spasticity (X) - Cycle 1 | -26.4 Degrees | Standard Deviation 24.9 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Angle of Spasticity (X) in Elbow Flexors as PTMG | Angle of Spasticity (X) -Cycle 2 | -31 Degrees | Standard Deviation 27.7 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Angle of Spasticity (X) in Elbow Flexors as PTMG | Angle of Spasticity (X) -Cycle 3 | -33.3 Degrees | Standard Deviation 26 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Angle of Spasticity (X) in Elbow Flexors as PTMG | Angle of Spasticity (X) -Cycle 4 | -46.4 Degrees | Standard Deviation 17.3 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Angle of Spasticity (X) in Elbow Flexors as PTMG | Angle of Arrest (XV1) - Cycle 1 | -0.4 Degrees | Standard Deviation 14.9 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Angle of Spasticity (X) in Elbow Flexors as PTMG | Angle of Arrest (XV1) - Cycle 2 | 1.3 Degrees | Standard Deviation 13.3 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Angle of Spasticity (X) in Elbow Flexors as PTMG | Angle of arrest (XV1) - Cycle 3 | 2.2 Degrees | Standard Deviation 10.6 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Angle of Spasticity (X) in Elbow Flexors as PTMG | Angle of Arrest (XV1) - Cycle 4 | -2.5 Degrees | Standard Deviation 9.4 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Angle of Spasticity (X) in Elbow Flexors as PTMG | Angle of Catch (XV3) - Cycle 1 | 26.0 Degrees | Standard Deviation 26.1 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Angle of Spasticity (X) in Elbow Flexors as PTMG | Angle of Catch (XV3) - Cycle 2 | 32.3 Degrees | Standard Deviation 28.8 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Angle of Spasticity (X) in Elbow Flexors as PTMG | Angle of Catch (XV3) - Cycle 3 | 35.5 Degrees | Standard Deviation 27.3 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Angle of Spasticity (X) in Elbow Flexors as PTMG | Angle of Catch (XV3) - Cycle 4 | 43.9 Degrees | Standard Deviation 23.1 |
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Angle of Spasticity (X) in Extrinsic Finger Flexors as PTMG
The Tardieu Scale (TS) was used to measure spasticity in extrinsic finger flexors. The TS is administered by applying passive stretch to a muscle group at two velocities. Slow speed of muscle stretch measures the range of passive motion. During a slow stretching movement, the examiner determines the angle of movement arrest, either due to subject discomfort or a mechanical resistance. The same movement is repeated at high velocity (as fast as possible) to determine the angle of catch and release. The angle of movement arrest at slow velocity (XV1) and the angle of catch at fast speed (XV3) were recorded. The spasticity angle (X) was calculated as the difference between XV1 and XV3. Mean changes in Angles XV1, XV3 and X from baseline to Week 4 are reported.
Time frame: At Week 4
Population: The ITT population was defined as all enrolled subjects who received at least one injection of study medication in this open label extension study. Too few subjects were treated in Cycle 5 to allow direct comparisons with other cycles and are not reported. Only subjects with data available for analysis at the point of testing are reported.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Angle of Spasticity (X) in Extrinsic Finger Flexors as PTMG | Angle of Spasticity (X) - Cycle 1 | -33.5 Degrees | Standard Deviation 54 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Angle of Spasticity (X) in Extrinsic Finger Flexors as PTMG | Angle of Spasticity (X) - Cycle 2 | -33.9 Degrees | Standard Deviation 55.9 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Angle of Spasticity (X) in Extrinsic Finger Flexors as PTMG | Angle of Spasticity (X) - Cycle 3 | -43.3 Degrees | Standard Deviation 57.8 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Angle of Spasticity (X) in Extrinsic Finger Flexors as PTMG | Angle of Spasticity (X) - Cycle 4 | -35.9 Degrees | Standard Deviation 48 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Angle of Spasticity (X) in Extrinsic Finger Flexors as PTMG | Angle of Arrest (XV1) - Cycle 1 | 24.3 Degrees | Standard Deviation 36.1 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Angle of Spasticity (X) in Extrinsic Finger Flexors as PTMG | Angle of Arrest (XV1) - Cycle 2 | 25.9 Degrees | Standard Deviation 36.5 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Angle of Spasticity (X) in Extrinsic Finger Flexors as PTMG | Angle of Arrest (XV1) - Cycle 3 | 24.9 Degrees | Standard Deviation 38.7 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Angle of Spasticity (X) in Extrinsic Finger Flexors as PTMG | Angle of Arrest (XV1) - Cycle 4 | 21.8 Degrees | Standard Deviation 39.6 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Angle of Spasticity (X) in Extrinsic Finger Flexors as PTMG | Angle of Catch (XV3) - Cycle 1 | 57.8 Degrees | Standard Deviation 55.1 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Angle of Spasticity (X) in Extrinsic Finger Flexors as PTMG | Angle of Catch (XV3) - Cycle 2 | 59.8 Degrees | Standard Deviation 57.8 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Angle of Spasticity (X) in Extrinsic Finger Flexors as PTMG | Angle of Catch (XV3) - Cycle 3 | 68.2 Degrees | Standard Deviation 55.6 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Angle of Spasticity (X) in Extrinsic Finger Flexors as PTMG | Angle of Catch (XV3) - Cycle 4 | 57.7 Degrees | Standard Deviation 52.6 |
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Angle of Spasticity (X) in Shoulder Extensors
The TS was used to measure spasticity in shoulder extensors. The TS is administered by applying passive stretch to a muscle group at two velocities. Slow speed of muscle stretch measures the range of passive motion. During a slow stretching movement, the examiner determines the angle of movement arrest, either due to subject discomfort or a mechanical resistance. The same movement is repeated at high velocity (as fast as possible) to determine the angle of catch and release. The angle of movement arrest at slow velocity (XV1) and the angle of catch at fast speed (XV3) were recorded. The spasticity angle (X) was calculated as the difference between XV1 and XV3. Mean changes in Angles XV1, XV3 and X from baseline to Week 4 are reported.
Time frame: At Week 4
Population: The ITT population was defined as all enrolled subjects who received at least one injection of study medication in this open label extension study. Too few subjects were treated in Cycle 5 to allow direct comparisons with other cycles and are not reported. Only subjects with data available for analysis at the point of testing are reported.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Angle of Spasticity (X) in Shoulder Extensors | Angle of Spasticity (X) - Cycle 1 | -13.3 Degrees | Standard Deviation 24.6 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Angle of Spasticity (X) in Shoulder Extensors | Angle of Spasticity (X) - Cycle 2 | -10.8 Degrees | Standard Deviation 30.1 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Angle of Spasticity (X) in Shoulder Extensors | Angle of Spasticity (X) - Cycle 3 | -6.4 Degrees | Standard Deviation 23.5 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Angle of Spasticity (X) in Shoulder Extensors | Angle of Spasticity (X) - Cycle 4 | -7.2 Degrees | Standard Deviation 27.4 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Angle of Spasticity (X) in Shoulder Extensors | Angle of Arrest (XV1) - Cycle 1 | 7.2 Degrees | Standard Deviation 16 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Angle of Spasticity (X) in Shoulder Extensors | Angle of Arrest (XV1) - Cycle 2 | 6.4 Degrees | Standard Deviation 23 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Angle of Spasticity (X) in Shoulder Extensors | Angle of Arrest (XV1) - Cycle 3 | 10.7 Degrees | Standard Deviation 23.8 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Angle of Spasticity (X) in Shoulder Extensors | Angle of Arrest (XV1) - Cycle 4 | 10.8 Degrees | Standard Deviation 26.1 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Angle of Spasticity (X) in Shoulder Extensors | Angle of Catch (XV3) - Cycle 1 | 20.5 Degrees | Standard Deviation 22.7 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Angle of Spasticity (X) in Shoulder Extensors | Angle of Catch (XV3) - Cycle 2 | 17.2 Degrees | Standard Deviation 26.9 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Angle of Spasticity (X) in Shoulder Extensors | Angle of Catch (XV3) - Cycle 3 | 17.1 Degrees | Standard Deviation 24.5 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Angle of Spasticity (X) in Shoulder Extensors | Angle of Catch (XV3) - Cycle 4 | 18.0 Degrees | Standard Deviation 19.6 |
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Angle of Spasticity (X) in Wrist Flexors as PTMG
The TS was used to measure spasticity in wrist flexors. The TS is administered by applying passive stretch to a muscle group at two velocities. Slow speed of muscle stretch measures the range of passive motion. During a slow stretching movement, the examiner determines the angle of movement arrest, either due to subject discomfort or a mechanical resistance. The same movement is repeated at high velocity (as fast as possible) to determine the angle of catch and release. The angle of movement arrest at slow velocity (XV1) and the angle of catch at fast speed (XV3) were recorded. The spasticity angle (X) was calculated as the difference between XV1 and XV3. Mean changes in Angles XV1, XV3 and X from baseline to Week 4 are reported.
Time frame: At Week 4
Population: The ITT population was defined as all enrolled subjects who received at least one injection of study medication in this open label extension study. Too few subjects were treated in Cycle 5 to allow direct comparisons with other cycles and are not reported. Only subjects with data available for analysis at the point of testing are reported.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Angle of Spasticity (X) in Wrist Flexors as PTMG | Angle of Spasticity (X) - Cycle 1 | -23.3 Degrees | Standard Deviation 32.5 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Angle of Spasticity (X) in Wrist Flexors as PTMG | Angle of Spasticity (X) - Cycle 2 | -28.8 Degrees | Standard Deviation 37.1 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Angle of Spasticity (X) in Wrist Flexors as PTMG | Angle of Spasticity (X) - Cycle 3 | -21.7 Degrees | Standard Deviation 35.2 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Angle of Spasticity (X) in Wrist Flexors as PTMG | Angle of Spasticity (X) - Cycle 4 | -13.5 Degrees | Standard Deviation 29.3 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Angle of Spasticity (X) in Wrist Flexors as PTMG | Angle of Arrest (XV1) - Cycle 1 | 12.6 Degrees | Standard Deviation 21.3 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Angle of Spasticity (X) in Wrist Flexors as PTMG | Angle of Arrest (XV1) - Cycle 2 | 16.4 Degrees | Standard Deviation 23.9 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Angle of Spasticity (X) in Wrist Flexors as PTMG | Angle of Arrest (XV1) - Cycle 3 | 18.6 Degrees | Standard Deviation 30.6 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Angle of Spasticity (X) in Wrist Flexors as PTMG | Angle of Arrest (XV1) - Cycle 4 | 19.0 Degrees | Standard Deviation 24.8 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Angle of Spasticity (X) in Wrist Flexors as PTMG | Angle of Catch (XV3) - Cycle 1 | 35.9 Degrees | Standard Deviation 35 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Angle of Spasticity (X) in Wrist Flexors as PTMG | Angle of Catch (XV3) - Cycle 2 | 45.2 Degrees | Standard Deviation 37.7 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Angle of Spasticity (X) in Wrist Flexors as PTMG | Angle of Catch (XV3) - Cycle 3 | 40.3 Degrees | Standard Deviation 33.3 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Angle of Spasticity (X) in Wrist Flexors as PTMG | Angle of Catch (XV3) - Cycle 4 | 32.5 Degrees | Standard Deviation 28.1 |
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Spasticity Grade (Y) in Elbow Flexors as PTMG
The TS was used to measure spasticity in elbow flexors.The TS is administered by applying passive stretch to a muscle group. The spasticity grade (Y) assesses quality of muscle reaction on a 5-point scale (measured at fast speed): 0 =No resistance throughout passive movement, 1=slight resistance throughout passive movement, 2=clear catch at precise angle, interrupting passive movement, followed by release, 3=fatigable clonus (less than 10 seconds when maintaining pressure) occurring at a precise angle, followed by release. 4=unfatigable clonus (more than 10 seconds when maintaining pressure) occurring at precise angle. Mean changes in spasticity grade (Y) from baseline to Week 4 are reported.
Time frame: At Week 4
Population: The ITT population was defined as all enrolled subjects who received at least one injection of study medication in this open label extension study. Too few subjects were treated in Cycle 5 to allow direct comparisons with other cycles and are not reported. Only subjects with data available for analysis at the point of testing are reported.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Spasticity Grade (Y) in Elbow Flexors as PTMG | Cycle 1 | -0.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.5 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Spasticity Grade (Y) in Elbow Flexors as PTMG | Cycle 2 | -0.4 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.7 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Spasticity Grade (Y) in Elbow Flexors as PTMG | Cycle 3 | -0.5 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.7 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Spasticity Grade (Y) in Elbow Flexors as PTMG | Cycle 4 | -0.6 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.5 |
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Spasticity Grade (Y) in Extrinsic Finger Flexors as PTMG
The TS was used to measure spasticity in extrinsic finger flexors. The TS is administered by applying passive stretch to a muscle group. The spasticity grade (Y) assesses quality of muscle reaction on a 5-point scale (measured at fast speed): 0 =No resistance throughout passive movement, 1=slight resistance throughout passive movement, 2=clear catch at precise angle, interrupting passive movement, followed by release, 3=fatigable clonus (less than 10 seconds when maintaining pressure) occurring at a precise angle, followed by release. 4=unfatigable clonus (more than 10 seconds when maintaining pressure) occurring at precise angle. Mean changes in spasticity grade (Y) from baseline to Week 4 are reported.
Time frame: At Week 4
Population: The ITT population was defined as all enrolled subjects who received at least one injection of study medication in this open label extension study. Too few subjects were treated in Cycle 5 to allow direct comparisons with other cycles and are not reported. Only subjects with data available for analysis at the point of testing are reported.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Spasticity Grade (Y) in Extrinsic Finger Flexors as PTMG | Cycle 1 | -0.6 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.7 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Spasticity Grade (Y) in Extrinsic Finger Flexors as PTMG | Cycle 2 | -0.6 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.8 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Spasticity Grade (Y) in Extrinsic Finger Flexors as PTMG | Cycle 3 | -0.6 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.8 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Spasticity Grade (Y) in Extrinsic Finger Flexors as PTMG | Cycle 4 | -0.5 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.7 |
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Spasticity Grade (Y) in Shoulder Extensors
The TS was used to measure spasticity in shoulder extensors. The TS is administered by applying passive stretch to a muscle group. The spasticity grade (Y) assesses quality of muscle reaction on a 5-point scale (measured at fast speed): 0 =No resistance throughout passive movement, 1=slight resistance throughout passive movement, 2=clear catch at precise angle, interrupting passive movement, followed by release, 3=fatigable clonus (less than 10 seconds when maintaining pressure) occurring at a precise angle, followed by release. 4=unfatigable clonus (more than 10 seconds when maintaining pressure) occurring at precise angle. Mean changes in spasticity grade (Y) from baseline to Week 4 are reported.
Time frame: At Week 4
Population: The ITT population was defined as all enrolled subjects who received at least one injection of study medication in this open label extension study. Too few subjects were treated in Cycle 5 to allow direct comparisons with other cycles and are not reported. Only subjects with data available for analysis at the point of testing are reported.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Spasticity Grade (Y) in Shoulder Extensors | Cycle 1 | -0.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.4 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Spasticity Grade (Y) in Shoulder Extensors | Cycle 2 | -0.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.6 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Spasticity Grade (Y) in Shoulder Extensors | Cycle 3 | -0.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.7 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Spasticity Grade (Y) in Shoulder Extensors | Cycle 4 | -0.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.5 |
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Spasticity Grade (Y) in Wrist Flexors as PTMG
The TS was used to measure spasticity in wrist flexors. The TS is administered by applying passive stretch to a muscle group. The spasticity grade (Y) assesses quality of muscle reaction on a 5-point scale (measured at fast speed): 0 =No resistance throughout passive movement, 1=slight resistance throughout passive movement, 2=clear catch at precise angle, interrupting passive movement, followed by release, 3=fatigable clonus (less than 10 seconds when maintaining pressure) occurring at a precise angle, followed by release. 4=unfatigable clonus (more than 10 seconds when maintaining pressure) occurring at precise angle. Mean changes in spasticity grade (Y) from baseline to Week 4 are reported.
Time frame: At Week 4
Population: The ITT population was defined as all enrolled subjects who received at least one injection of study medication in this open label extension study. Too few subjects were treated in Cycle 5 to allow direct comparisons with other cycles and are not reported. Only subjects with data available for analysis at the point of testing are reported.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Spasticity Grade (Y) in Wrist Flexors as PTMG | Cycle 1 | -0.7 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.1 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Spasticity Grade (Y) in Wrist Flexors as PTMG | Cycle 2 | -0.9 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Spasticity Grade (Y) in Wrist Flexors as PTMG | Cycle 3 | -0.6 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.9 |
| Total Dysport® | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Spasticity Grade (Y) in Wrist Flexors as PTMG | Cycle 4 | -0.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.7 |
Percentage of Subjects With at Least 1 Grade Reduction in DAS for PTT at Week 4
At baseline the subject and investigator together selected one of the four DAS domains as the PTT. The selected domain was required to have a rating of moderate or severe (≥2) at baseline. The DAS is a 4-point scale, the extent of functional impairment in 4 functional domains (dressing, hygiene, limb position and pain) was rated as follows: 0=no disability, 1=mild disability (noticeable but does not interfere significantly with normal activities), 2=moderate disability (normal activities require increased effort and/or assistance) and 3=severe disability (normal activities limited). The percentage of subjects with at least 1 grade reduction from baseline in DAS for PTT at Week 4 are reported.
Time frame: At Week 4
Population: The ITT population was defined as all enrolled subjects who received at least one injection of study medication in this open label extension study. Too few subjects were treated in Cycle 5 to allow direct comparisons with other cycles and are not reported. Only subjects with data available for analysis at the point of testing are reported.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total Dysport® | Percentage of Subjects With at Least 1 Grade Reduction in DAS for PTT at Week 4 | Cycle 1 | 68.5 Percentage of Subjects |
| Total Dysport® | Percentage of Subjects With at Least 1 Grade Reduction in DAS for PTT at Week 4 | Cycle 2 | 75.1 Percentage of Subjects |
| Total Dysport® | Percentage of Subjects With at Least 1 Grade Reduction in DAS for PTT at Week 4 | Cycle 3 | 73.7 Percentage of Subjects |
| Total Dysport® | Percentage of Subjects With at Least 1 Grade Reduction in DAS for PTT at Week 4 | Cycle 4 | 74.1 Percentage of Subjects |
Percentage of Subjects With at Least 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in MAS for Elbow Flexors at Week 4
The MAS consists of 6 grades: 0, 1, 1+, 2, 3, or 4 that can be applied to muscles of both the upper and lower limbs. The MAS was applied by the rater by stretching the joint through its full available range over 1 second. The percentage of subjects at least a 1 grade reduction and at least a 2 grades reduction from baseline in mean MAS in the elbow flexors at Week 4 are reported.
Time frame: At Week 4
Population: The ITT population was defined as all enrolled subjects who received at least one injection of study medication in this open label extension study. Too few subjects were treated in Cycle 5 to allow direct comparisons with other cycles and are not reported. Only subjects with data available for analysis at the point of testing are reported.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total Dysport® | Percentage of Subjects With at Least 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in MAS for Elbow Flexors at Week 4 | At least 1 Grade Reduction -Cycle 1 | 84.1 percentage of subjects |
| Total Dysport® | Percentage of Subjects With at Least 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in MAS for Elbow Flexors at Week 4 | At least 1 Grade Reduction -Cycle 2 | 78.3 percentage of subjects |
| Total Dysport® | Percentage of Subjects With at Least 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in MAS for Elbow Flexors at Week 4 | At least 1 Grade Reduction -Cycle 3 | 75.6 percentage of subjects |
| Total Dysport® | Percentage of Subjects With at Least 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in MAS for Elbow Flexors at Week 4 | At least 1 Grade Reduction -Cycle 4 | 73.3 percentage of subjects |
| Total Dysport® | Percentage of Subjects With at Least 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in MAS for Elbow Flexors at Week 4 | At least 2 Grades Reduction -Cycle 1 | 34.8 percentage of subjects |
| Total Dysport® | Percentage of Subjects With at Least 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in MAS for Elbow Flexors at Week 4 | At least 2 Grades Reduction -Cycle 2 | 41.7 percentage of subjects |
| Total Dysport® | Percentage of Subjects With at Least 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in MAS for Elbow Flexors at Week 4 | At least 2 Grades Reduction -Cycle 3 | 33.3 percentage of subjects |
| Total Dysport® | Percentage of Subjects With at Least 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in MAS for Elbow Flexors at Week 4 | At least 2 Grades Reduction -Cycle 4 | 40.0 percentage of subjects |
Percentage of Subjects With at Least 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in MAS for Extrinsic Finger Flexors at Week 4
The MAS consists of 6 grades: 0, 1, 1+, 2, 3, or 4 that can be applied to muscles of both the upper and lower limbs. The MAS was applied by the rater by stretching the joint through its full available range over 1 second. The percentage of subjects with at least a 1 grade reduction and at least a 2 grades reduction from baseline in mean MAS in the extrinsic finger flexors at Week 4 are reported.
Time frame: At Week 4
Population: The ITT population was defined as all enrolled subjects who received at least one injection of study medication in this open label extension study. Too few subjects were treated in Cycle 5 to allow direct comparisons with other cycles and are not reported. Only subjects with data available for analysis at the point of testing are reported.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total Dysport® | Percentage of Subjects With at Least 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in MAS for Extrinsic Finger Flexors at Week 4 | At least 1 Grade Reduction -Cycle 1 | 78.6 percentage of subjects |
| Total Dysport® | Percentage of Subjects With at Least 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in MAS for Extrinsic Finger Flexors at Week 4 | At least 1 Grade Reduction -Cycle 2 | 81.3 percentage of subjects |
| Total Dysport® | Percentage of Subjects With at Least 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in MAS for Extrinsic Finger Flexors at Week 4 | At least 1 Grade Reduction -Cycle 3 | 80 percentage of subjects |
| Total Dysport® | Percentage of Subjects With at Least 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in MAS for Extrinsic Finger Flexors at Week 4 | At least 1 Grade Reduction -Cycle 4 | 80.4 percentage of subjects |
| Total Dysport® | Percentage of Subjects With at Least 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in MAS for Extrinsic Finger Flexors at Week 4 | At least 2 Grades Reduction -Cycle 1 | 44.1 percentage of subjects |
| Total Dysport® | Percentage of Subjects With at Least 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in MAS for Extrinsic Finger Flexors at Week 4 | At least 2 Grades Reduction -Cycle 2 | 49.3 percentage of subjects |
| Total Dysport® | Percentage of Subjects With at Least 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in MAS for Extrinsic Finger Flexors at Week 4 | At least 2 Grades Reduction -Cycle 3 | 49.5 percentage of subjects |
| Total Dysport® | Percentage of Subjects With at Least 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in MAS for Extrinsic Finger Flexors at Week 4 | At least 2 Grades Reduction -Cycle 4 | 37.5 percentage of subjects |
Percentage of Subjects With at Least 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in MAS for Overall PTMG
The MAS consists of 6 grades: 0, 1, 1+, 2, 3, or 4 that can be applied to muscles of both the upper and lower limbs. The MAS was applied by the rater by stretching the joint through its full available range over 1 second. The percentage of subjects with at least a 1 grade reduction and at least a 2 grades reduction from baseline in mean MAS in the overall PTMG at Week 4 are reported.
Time frame: At Week 4
Population: The ITT population was defined as all enrolled subjects who received at least one injection of study medication in this open label extension study. Too few subjects were treated in Cycle 5 to allow direct comparisons with other cycles and are not reported. Only subjects with data available for analysis at the point of testing are reported.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total Dysport® | Percentage of Subjects With at Least 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in MAS for Overall PTMG | At least 1 grade reduction - Cycle 1 | 77.6 percentage of participants |
| Total Dysport® | Percentage of Subjects With at Least 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in MAS for Overall PTMG | At least 1 grade reduction - Cycle 2 | 79.5 percentage of participants |
| Total Dysport® | Percentage of Subjects With at Least 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in MAS for Overall PTMG | At least 1 grade reduction - Cycle 3 | 77.1 percentage of participants |
| Total Dysport® | Percentage of Subjects With at Least 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in MAS for Overall PTMG | At least 1 grade reduction - Cycle 4 | 75.3 percentage of participants |
| Total Dysport® | Percentage of Subjects With at Least 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in MAS for Overall PTMG | At least 2 grades reduction - Cycle 1 | 42.1 percentage of participants |
| Total Dysport® | Percentage of Subjects With at Least 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in MAS for Overall PTMG | At least 2 grades reduction - Cycle 2 | 48.0 percentage of participants |
| Total Dysport® | Percentage of Subjects With at Least 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in MAS for Overall PTMG | At least 2 grades reduction - Cycle 3 | 44.6 percentage of participants |
| Total Dysport® | Percentage of Subjects With at Least 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in MAS for Overall PTMG | At least 2 grades reduction - Cycle 4 | 37.0 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Subjects With at Least 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in MAS for Wrist Flexors at Week 4
The MAS consists of 6 grades: 0, 1, 1+, 2, 3, or 4 that can be applied to muscles of both the upper and lower limbs. The MAS was applied by the rater by stretching the joint through its full available range over 1 second. The percentage of subjects with at least a 1 grade reduction and at least a 2 grades reduction in mean MAS in the wrist flexors at Week 4 are reported.
Time frame: At Week 4
Population: The ITT population was defined as all enrolled subjects who received at least one injection of study medication in this open label extension study. Too few subjects were treated in Cycle 5 to allow direct comparisons with other cycles and are not reported. Only subjects with data available for analysis at the point of testing are reported.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total Dysport® | Percentage of Subjects With at Least 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in MAS for Wrist Flexors at Week 4 | At least 1 Grade Reduction -Cycle 1 | 62.5 percentage of subjects |
| Total Dysport® | Percentage of Subjects With at Least 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in MAS for Wrist Flexors at Week 4 | At least 1 Grade Reduction -Cycle 2 | 74.3 percentage of subjects |
| Total Dysport® | Percentage of Subjects With at Least 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in MAS for Wrist Flexors at Week 4 | At least 1 Grade Reduction -Cycle 3 | 73.9 percentage of subjects |
| Total Dysport® | Percentage of Subjects With at Least 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in MAS for Wrist Flexors at Week 4 | At least 1 Grade Reduction -Cycle 4 | 50 percentage of subjects |
| Total Dysport® | Percentage of Subjects With at Least 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in MAS for Wrist Flexors at Week 4 | At least 2 Grades Reduction -Cycle 1 | 47.5 percentage of subjects |
| Total Dysport® | Percentage of Subjects With at Least 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in MAS for Wrist Flexors at Week 4 | At least 2 Grades Reduction -Cycle 2 | 54.3 percentage of subjects |
| Total Dysport® | Percentage of Subjects With at Least 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in MAS for Wrist Flexors at Week 4 | At least 2 Grades Reduction -Cycle 3 | 47.8 percentage of subjects |
| Total Dysport® | Percentage of Subjects With at Least 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in MAS for Wrist Flexors at Week 4 | At least 2 Grades Reduction -Cycle 4 | 30.0 percentage of subjects |
Percentage of Subjects With at Least One Grade Reduction in DAS for Individual Domains at Week 4
The DAS is a 4-point scale. The extent of functional impairment in 4 functional domains (dressing, hygiene, limb position and pain) was rated as follows: 0=no disability, 1=mild disability (noticeable but does not interfere significantly with normal activities), 2=moderate disability (normal activities require increased effort and/or assistance) and 3=severe disability (normal activities limited). The percentage of subjects with at least one grade reduction in DAS for each of the individual domains at Week 4 is reported.
Time frame: At Week 4
Population: The ITT population was defined as all enrolled subjects who received at least one injection of study medication in this open label extension study. Too few subjects were treated in Cycle 5 to allow direct comparisons with other cycles and are not reported. Only subjects with data available for analysis at the point of testing are reported.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total Dysport® | Percentage of Subjects With at Least One Grade Reduction in DAS for Individual Domains at Week 4 | Hygiene - Cycle 1 | 40.9 percentage of subjects |
| Total Dysport® | Percentage of Subjects With at Least One Grade Reduction in DAS for Individual Domains at Week 4 | Hygiene - Cycle 2 | 45.4 percentage of subjects |
| Total Dysport® | Percentage of Subjects With at Least One Grade Reduction in DAS for Individual Domains at Week 4 | Hygiene - Cycle 3 | 44.6 percentage of subjects |
| Total Dysport® | Percentage of Subjects With at Least One Grade Reduction in DAS for Individual Domains at Week 4 | Hygiene - Cycle 4 | 46.9 percentage of subjects |
| Total Dysport® | Percentage of Subjects With at Least One Grade Reduction in DAS for Individual Domains at Week 4 | Dressing - Cycle 1 | 40.9 percentage of subjects |
| Total Dysport® | Percentage of Subjects With at Least One Grade Reduction in DAS for Individual Domains at Week 4 | Dressing - Cycle 2 | 47.2 percentage of subjects |
| Total Dysport® | Percentage of Subjects With at Least One Grade Reduction in DAS for Individual Domains at Week 4 | Dressing - Cycle 3 | 46.9 percentage of subjects |
| Total Dysport® | Percentage of Subjects With at Least One Grade Reduction in DAS for Individual Domains at Week 4 | Dressing - Cycle 4 | 53.1 percentage of subjects |
| Total Dysport® | Percentage of Subjects With at Least One Grade Reduction in DAS for Individual Domains at Week 4 | Limb Position - Cycle 1 | 55.5 percentage of subjects |
| Total Dysport® | Percentage of Subjects With at Least One Grade Reduction in DAS for Individual Domains at Week 4 | Limb Position - Cycle 2 | 59.4 percentage of subjects |
| Total Dysport® | Percentage of Subjects With at Least One Grade Reduction in DAS for Individual Domains at Week 4 | Limb Position - Cycle 3 | 60.6 percentage of subjects |
| Total Dysport® | Percentage of Subjects With at Least One Grade Reduction in DAS for Individual Domains at Week 4 | Limb Position - Cycle 4 | 53.1 percentage of subjects |
| Total Dysport® | Percentage of Subjects With at Least One Grade Reduction in DAS for Individual Domains at Week 4 | Pain - Cycle 2 | 36.7 percentage of subjects |
| Total Dysport® | Percentage of Subjects With at Least One Grade Reduction in DAS for Individual Domains at Week 4 | Pain - Cycle 3 | 42.3 percentage of subjects |
| Total Dysport® | Percentage of Subjects With at Least One Grade Reduction in DAS for Individual Domains at Week 4 | Pain - Cycle 4 | 48.1 percentage of subjects |
| Total Dysport® | Percentage of Subjects With at Least One Grade Reduction in DAS for Individual Domains at Week 4 | Pain - Cycle 1 | 33.1 percentage of subjects |
Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) of Treatment Response at Week 4
The PGA is a 9-point rating scale: -4=markedly worse, -3=much worse, -2=worse, -1=slightly worse, 0=no change, +1=slightly improved, +2=improved, +3=much improved, +4=markedly improved. An assessment of overall treatment response was conducted by the investigator and the mean PGA scores during long-term open label treatment with Dysport were reported.
Time frame: At Week 4
Population: The ITT population was defined as all enrolled subjects who received at least one injection of study medication in this open label extension study. Too few subjects were treated in Cycle 5 to allow direct comparisons with other cycles and are not reported. Only subjects with data available for analysis at the point of testing are reported.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Dysport® | Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) of Treatment Response at Week 4 | Cycle 1 | 1.7 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1 |
| Total Dysport® | Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) of Treatment Response at Week 4 | Cycle 2 | 1.9 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1 |
| Total Dysport® | Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) of Treatment Response at Week 4 | Cycle 3 | 1.9 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1 |
| Total Dysport® | Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) of Treatment Response at Week 4 | Cycle 4 | 2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.9 |