Skip to content

Dysport® Adult Upper Limb Spasticity Extension Study

A Phase III, Multicentre, Prospective, Open Label Extension Study to Assess the Long Term Safety and Efficacy of Repeated Treatment of Dysport® Intramuscular Injections Used for the Treatment of Upper Limb Spasticity in Adult Subjects With Spastic Hemiparesis Due to Stroke or Traumatic Brain Injury

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01313312
Enrollment
258
Registered
2011-03-11
Start date
2011-11-30
Completion date
2014-12-31
Last updated
2022-09-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Nervous System Disorders

Brief summary

The purpose of this research study is to assess the long term safety of Dysport® in hemiparetic subjects with upper limb spasticity due to stroke or traumatic brain injury over repeated treatment cycles.

Detailed description

This was a phase III, multicentre, prospective, open label, repeat treatment cycles, extension to the double study Y-52-52120-145 (Study 145) . The study included both rollover subjects from Study 145 and de novo subjects. The primary study objective was to assess the long term safety of Dysport® in hemiparetic subjects with upper limb spasticity due to stroke or traumatic brain injury over repeated treatment cycles. The secondary study objective was to assess the long term efficacy of repeated treatment with Dysport®.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALBotulinum toxin type A

Dysport® was supplied to the study centres in vials containing 500 U of botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A). Depending on the dose administered up to 3 vials were required for the injection. Each vial was reconstituted with sodium chloride for injection (0.9%). A total volume of 5.0 mL of the reconstituted product was injected for Dysport® 500 U and 1000 U, and 7.5 mL was injected for Dysport® 1500 U.

Sponsors

Ipsen
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Completion of the double blind study, Y-52-52120-145

Exclusion criteria

* Major limitation in the passive range of motion in upper limb

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Assessment of the Long-term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Up to Week 52A TEAE was reported as emergent if it arose (i.e. started or worsened in severity) in the treatment phase after the subject received study medication. Adverse events of special interest (AESIs) were identified as those assessed as being due to remote spread of effect of Dysport®, or any adverse event (AE) that was assessed as a hypersensitivity reaction. TEAEs, AESIs, severe TEAEs, serious adverse events (SAEs), treatment related TEAEs, TEAEs leading to withdrawal and fatal SAEs are summarised by treatment cycle.
Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in Diastolic and Systolic Blood Pressure (BP)Up to Week 52Systolic and diastolic BP were recorded at screening, baseline and at each post baseline visit. Vital signs were measured with the subject in a sitting position after resting for 3 minutes. Outcome measure is reported for number of subjects with data available for analysis.
Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in Heart Rate (HR)Up to Week 52HR was recorded at screening, baseline and at each post baseline visit. Vital signs were measured with the subject in a sitting position after resting for 3 minutes. Outcome measure is reported for number of subjects with data available for analysis.
Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in Red Blood Cell (RBC) CountUp to Week 52Blood samples for RBC count were taken at baseline, at post treatment follow up visit Week 4, and at end of study/early withdrawal. Outcome measure is reported for number of subjects with data available for analysis.
Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in Haemoglobin and Mean Corpuscular Haemoglobin Concentration (MCHC)Up to Week 52Blood samples for haemoglobin and MCHC were taken at baseline, at post treatment follow up visit Week 4, and at the end of study/early withdrawal. Outcome measure is reported for number of subjects with data available for analysis.
Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in HaematocritUp to Week 52Blood samples for haematocrit were taken at baseline, at post treatment follow up visit Week 4, and at end of study/early withdrawal. Outcome measure is reported for number of subjects with data available for analysis.
Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in Mean Corpuscular Haemoglobin (MCH)Up to Week 52Blood samples for MCH were taken at baseline, at post treatment follow up visit Week 4, and at end of study/early withdrawal. Outcome measure is reported for number of subjects with data available for analysis.
Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in Mean Corpuscular Volume (MCV)Up to Week 52Blood samples for MCV were taken at baseline, at post treatment follow up visit Week 4, and at end of study/early withdrawal. Outcome measure is reported for number of subjects with data available for analysis.
Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in White Blood Cell (WBC) Count, Neutrophils, Lymphocytes and PlateletsUp to Week 52Blood samples for WBC count with differentials (neutrophils, lymphocytes) and platelet count were taken at baseline, at post treatment follow up visit Week 4, and at end of study or early withdrawal.
Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG)Up to Week 5212-lead ECG tracing was performed at baseline, post treatment at Week 4 and at the end of study/early withdrawal visit. The 12-lead ECG recordings were performed at a paper speed of 25 mm/s, recorded with the subject in a supine position after 5 minutes rest. The ECG parameters reported were QRS duration, PR duration, QT duration, QTcB (QT interval corrected for HR according to Bazett), and QTcF (QT interval corrected for HR according to Fridericia) at baseline and the change to end of study/early withdrawal visit (EOS).
Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP), Gamma Glutamyl Transferase (GGT), Serum Glutamic Oxaloacetic Transaminase (SGOT) and Serum Glutamic Pyruvic Transaminase (SGPT)Up to Week 52Blood samples for analysis of the following clinical chemistry parameters: ALP, GGT, SGOT and SGPT were taken at baseline, at post treatment follow up visit Week 4, and at end of study/early withdrawal. Outcome measure is reported for number of subjects with data available for analysis.
Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in Total Bilirubin and CreatinineUp to Week 52Blood samples for clinical chemistry analysis of total bilirubin and creatinine were taken at baseline, at post treatment follow up visit Week 4, and at end of study/early withdrawal. Outcome measure is reported for number of subjects with data available for analysis.
Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN) and Fasting Blood GlucoseUp to Week 52Blood samples for analysis of BUN and fasting blood glucose levels were taken at baseline, at post treatment follow up visit Week 4, and at end of study/early withdrawal.
Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in 12 Lead ECG - HRUp to Week 52HR was measured by 12-lead ECG tracing, performed at baseline, at post treatment follow up visit Week 4, and at the end of study or early withdrawal visit. The 12-lead ECG recordings were performed at a paper speed of 25 mm/s, recorded with the subject in a supine position after 5 minutes rest.
Number of Subjects With Botulinum Toxin A Binding and Neutralising Putative AntibodiesUp to Week 52Blood samples were collected at baseline, Week 4 of each cycle, and at the end of study/early withdrawal to test for the presence of Botulinum Toxin A Binding antibodies. Samples positive for the presence of binding antibodies were then analysed for the presence of neutralising putative antibodies. The number of subjects who were either positive (+ve) or negative (-ve) at baseline and then positive post baseline for binding or neutralising antibodies were reported.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Angle of Spasticity (X) in Elbow Flexors as PTMGAt Week 4The TS was used to measure spasticity in elbow flexors. The TS is administered by applying passive stretch to a muscle group at two velocities. Slow speed of muscle stretch measures the range of passive motion. During a slow stretching movement, the examiner determines the angle of movement arrest, either due to subject discomfort or a mechanical resistance. The same movement is repeated at high velocity (as fast as possible) to determine the angle of catch and release. The angle of movement arrest at slow velocity (XV1) and the angle of catch at fast speed (XV3) were recorded. The spasticity angle (X) was calculated as the difference between XV1 and XV3. Mean changes in Angles XV1, XV3 and X from baseline to Week 4 are reported.
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Spasticity Grade (Y) in Elbow Flexors as PTMGAt Week 4The TS was used to measure spasticity in elbow flexors.The TS is administered by applying passive stretch to a muscle group. The spasticity grade (Y) assesses quality of muscle reaction on a 5-point scale (measured at fast speed): 0 =No resistance throughout passive movement, 1=slight resistance throughout passive movement, 2=clear catch at precise angle, interrupting passive movement, followed by release, 3=fatigable clonus (less than 10 seconds when maintaining pressure) occurring at a precise angle, followed by release. 4=unfatigable clonus (more than 10 seconds when maintaining pressure) occurring at precise angle. Mean changes in spasticity grade (Y) from baseline to Week 4 are reported.
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Angle of Spasticity (X) in Wrist Flexors as PTMGAt Week 4The TS was used to measure spasticity in wrist flexors. The TS is administered by applying passive stretch to a muscle group at two velocities. Slow speed of muscle stretch measures the range of passive motion. During a slow stretching movement, the examiner determines the angle of movement arrest, either due to subject discomfort or a mechanical resistance. The same movement is repeated at high velocity (as fast as possible) to determine the angle of catch and release. The angle of movement arrest at slow velocity (XV1) and the angle of catch at fast speed (XV3) were recorded. The spasticity angle (X) was calculated as the difference between XV1 and XV3. Mean changes in Angles XV1, XV3 and X from baseline to Week 4 are reported.
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Spasticity Grade (Y) in Wrist Flexors as PTMGAt Week 4The TS was used to measure spasticity in wrist flexors. The TS is administered by applying passive stretch to a muscle group. The spasticity grade (Y) assesses quality of muscle reaction on a 5-point scale (measured at fast speed): 0 =No resistance throughout passive movement, 1=slight resistance throughout passive movement, 2=clear catch at precise angle, interrupting passive movement, followed by release, 3=fatigable clonus (less than 10 seconds when maintaining pressure) occurring at a precise angle, followed by release. 4=unfatigable clonus (more than 10 seconds when maintaining pressure) occurring at precise angle. Mean changes in spasticity grade (Y) from baseline to Week 4 are reported.
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Angle of Spasticity (X) in Shoulder ExtensorsAt Week 4The TS was used to measure spasticity in shoulder extensors. The TS is administered by applying passive stretch to a muscle group at two velocities. Slow speed of muscle stretch measures the range of passive motion. During a slow stretching movement, the examiner determines the angle of movement arrest, either due to subject discomfort or a mechanical resistance. The same movement is repeated at high velocity (as fast as possible) to determine the angle of catch and release. The angle of movement arrest at slow velocity (XV1) and the angle of catch at fast speed (XV3) were recorded. The spasticity angle (X) was calculated as the difference between XV1 and XV3. Mean changes in Angles XV1, XV3 and X from baseline to Week 4 are reported.
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Spasticity Grade (Y) in Shoulder ExtensorsAt Week 4The TS was used to measure spasticity in shoulder extensors. The TS is administered by applying passive stretch to a muscle group. The spasticity grade (Y) assesses quality of muscle reaction on a 5-point scale (measured at fast speed): 0 =No resistance throughout passive movement, 1=slight resistance throughout passive movement, 2=clear catch at precise angle, interrupting passive movement, followed by release, 3=fatigable clonus (less than 10 seconds when maintaining pressure) occurring at a precise angle, followed by release. 4=unfatigable clonus (more than 10 seconds when maintaining pressure) occurring at precise angle. Mean changes in spasticity grade (Y) from baseline to Week 4 are reported.
Mean Change From Baseline in Active Range of Motion (AROM) at Week 4 in the 3 Possible PTMGsAt Week 4The AROM was assessed by the range of extension achieved by the subject moving each joint in the PTMGs (extrinsic finger flexors, elbow flexors and wrist flexors) without assistance. A goniometer was used for measurements in the elbow and wrist flexors but not for measurements in the extrinsic finger flexors. Mean changes in AROM in the 3 possible PTMGs from baseline to Week 4 are reported.
Mean Change From Baseline at Week 4 in Ease of Applying a SplintAt Week 4The ease of applying a splint was evaluated on a 6-point scale (0= no splint needed, -1= splint needed and applied with no difficulty, -2= splint needed and applied with mild difficulty, -3= splint needed and applied with moderate difficulty, -4= splint needed and applied with severe difficulty, -5= splint needed,but unable to apply). Mean change in ease of applying a splint from baseline to Week 4 was reported.
Mean Change From Baseline in Modified Frenchay Scale (MFS) at Week 4At Week 4The MFS was used to measure upper limb active function. Each subject was video taped while performing specific tasks. The videos were sent to a central provider and were read and scored by two independent readers blinded to the timing of the video and to treatment. These central assessments were used for the analysis of efficacy endpoints. The MFS consists of 10 tasks asking the subject to reach, grasp, carry and release different objects of different sizes which subjects are likely to use in their daily life. Each of these tasks was rated on a 10 point scale ranging from no movement to normal movement; for each task, the score 5 is used to rate a task barely accomplished. Mean change in MFS from baseline to Week 4 was reported.
Mean Change From Baseline in Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36) Quality of Life (QoL) at End of Study/Early Withdrawal VisitUp to Week 52Subjects were asked to complete the SF-36 questionnaires prior to the study treatment at baseline and at the end of study/early withdrawal visit. The SF-36 is a generic non-preference based health status measure. This instrument assessed subject health across 8 variable dimensions, which are specific health domains such as physical functioning, social functioning and vitality. Each variable item score is coded and turned into a 0-100 scale where 0 indicates the worst and 100 indicates the best possible health state for both the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) of the questionnaire. Baseline results and the change from baseline to end of study/early withdrawal for the PCS and MCS are reported.
Mean Change From Baseline Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) in the Overall Primary Targeted Muscle Group (PTMG) for Upper Limb at Week 4At Week 4The clinical assessment of muscle tone was performed using the MAS. The MAS consists of 6 grades: 0, 1, 1+, 2, 3, or 4 that can be applied to muscles of both the upper and lower limbs. The MAS was applied by the rater by stretching the joint through its full available range over 1 second. The mean changes from baseline to Week 4 in MAS in the overall PTMG (finger, wrist or elbow flexors) are reported.
Mean Change From Baseline in European 5 Dimensions, 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) QoL at End of Study/Early Withdrawal VisitUp to Week 52Subjects were asked to complete the EQ-5D-5L QoL questionnaires prior to the study treatment at baseline and at the end of study/early withdrawal visit. The EQ-5D-5L index is a generic preference based measure of health related QoL producing utility scores that represent subject preferences for particular health states. This instrument rated subject health state looking at 5 specific dimensions such as mobility, self-care, usual activity, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression and scored their general health state. Each dimension has 5 levels of severity (no problems, slight problems,moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems). In addition, a visual analogue scale (VAS) ranging from 0 to 100 was also included for the patients to summarize their overall health status, where 0 is the worst and 100 the best possible health state. The mean values for each dimension and the VAS scores at baseline and at the end of-study /early withdrawal are reported.
Percentage of Subjects With at Least 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in MAS for Overall PTMGAt Week 4The MAS consists of 6 grades: 0, 1, 1+, 2, 3, or 4 that can be applied to muscles of both the upper and lower limbs. The MAS was applied by the rater by stretching the joint through its full available range over 1 second. The percentage of subjects with at least a 1 grade reduction and at least a 2 grades reduction from baseline in mean MAS in the overall PTMG at Week 4 are reported.
Mean Change From Baseline MAS in the Extrinsic Finger Flexors at Week 4At Week 4The clinical assessment of muscle tone was performed using the MAS. The MAS consists of 6 grades: 0, 1, 1+, 2, 3, or 4 that can be applied to muscles of both the upper and lower limbs. The MAS was applied by the rater by stretching the joint through its full available range over 1 second. The mean changes from baseline to Week 4 in MAS in the extrinsic finger flexors are reported.
Percentage of Subjects With at Least 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in MAS for Extrinsic Finger Flexors at Week 4At Week 4The MAS consists of 6 grades: 0, 1, 1+, 2, 3, or 4 that can be applied to muscles of both the upper and lower limbs. The MAS was applied by the rater by stretching the joint through its full available range over 1 second. The percentage of subjects with at least a 1 grade reduction and at least a 2 grades reduction from baseline in mean MAS in the extrinsic finger flexors at Week 4 are reported.
Mean Change From Baseline MAS in the Wrist Flexors at Week 4At Week 4The clinical assessment of muscle tone was performed using the MAS. The MAS consists of 6 grades: 0, 1, 1+, 2, 3, or 4 that can be applied to muscles of both the upper and lower limbs. The MAS was applied by the rater by stretching the joint through its full available range over 1 second. The mean changes from baseline to Week 4 in MAS in the wrist flexors are reported.
Percentage of Subjects With at Least 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in MAS for Wrist Flexors at Week 4At Week 4The MAS consists of 6 grades: 0, 1, 1+, 2, 3, or 4 that can be applied to muscles of both the upper and lower limbs. The MAS was applied by the rater by stretching the joint through its full available range over 1 second. The percentage of subjects with at least a 1 grade reduction and at least a 2 grades reduction in mean MAS in the wrist flexors at Week 4 are reported.
Mean Change From Baseline MAS in the Elbow Flexors at Week 4At Week 4The clinical assessment of muscle tone was performed using the MAS. The MAS consists of 6 grades: 0, 1, 1+, 2, 3, or 4 that can be applied to muscles of both the upper and lower limbs. The MAS was applied by the rater by stretching the joint through its full available range over 1 second. The mean changes from baseline to Week 4 in MAS in the elbow flexors are reported.
Percentage of Subjects With at Least 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in MAS for Elbow Flexors at Week 4At Week 4The MAS consists of 6 grades: 0, 1, 1+, 2, 3, or 4 that can be applied to muscles of both the upper and lower limbs. The MAS was applied by the rater by stretching the joint through its full available range over 1 second. The percentage of subjects at least a 1 grade reduction and at least a 2 grades reduction from baseline in mean MAS in the elbow flexors at Week 4 are reported.
Mean Change From Baseline MAS in the Shoulder Extensors at Week 4At Week 4The clinical assessment of muscle tone was performed using the MAS. The MAS consists of 6 grades: 0, 1, 1+, 2, 3, or 4 that can be applied to muscles of both the upper and lower limbs. The MAS was applied by the rater by stretching the joint through its full available range over 1 second. The mean changes from baseline to Week 4 in MAS in the shoulder extensors are reported.
Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) of Treatment Response at Week 4At Week 4The PGA is a 9-point rating scale: -4=markedly worse, -3=much worse, -2=worse, -1=slightly worse, 0=no change, +1=slightly improved, +2=improved, +3=much improved, +4=markedly improved. An assessment of overall treatment response was conducted by the investigator and the mean PGA scores during long-term open label treatment with Dysport were reported.
Mean Change From Baseline in Disability Assessment Scale (DAS) Score for the Principal Target of Treatment (PTT) at Week 4At Week 4At baseline the subject and investigator together selected one of the four DAS domains as the PTT. The selected domain was required to have a rating of moderate or severe (≥2) at baseline. The DAS is a 4-point scale, the extent of functional impairment in 4 functional domains (dressing, hygiene, limb position and pain) was rated as follows: 0=no disability, 1=mild disability (noticeable but does not interfere significantly with normal activities), 2=moderate disability (normal activities require increased effort and/or assistance) and 3=severe disability (normal activities limited). The mean changes in DAS at Week 4 are reported.
Percentage of Subjects With at Least 1 Grade Reduction in DAS for PTT at Week 4At Week 4At baseline the subject and investigator together selected one of the four DAS domains as the PTT. The selected domain was required to have a rating of moderate or severe (≥2) at baseline. The DAS is a 4-point scale, the extent of functional impairment in 4 functional domains (dressing, hygiene, limb position and pain) was rated as follows: 0=no disability, 1=mild disability (noticeable but does not interfere significantly with normal activities), 2=moderate disability (normal activities require increased effort and/or assistance) and 3=severe disability (normal activities limited). The percentage of subjects with at least 1 grade reduction from baseline in DAS for PTT at Week 4 are reported.
Percentage of Subjects With at Least One Grade Reduction in DAS for Individual Domains at Week 4At Week 4The DAS is a 4-point scale. The extent of functional impairment in 4 functional domains (dressing, hygiene, limb position and pain) was rated as follows: 0=no disability, 1=mild disability (noticeable but does not interfere significantly with normal activities), 2=moderate disability (normal activities require increased effort and/or assistance) and 3=severe disability (normal activities limited). The percentage of subjects with at least one grade reduction in DAS for each of the individual domains at Week 4 is reported.
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Angle of Spasticity (X) in Extrinsic Finger Flexors as PTMGAt Week 4The Tardieu Scale (TS) was used to measure spasticity in extrinsic finger flexors. The TS is administered by applying passive stretch to a muscle group at two velocities. Slow speed of muscle stretch measures the range of passive motion. During a slow stretching movement, the examiner determines the angle of movement arrest, either due to subject discomfort or a mechanical resistance. The same movement is repeated at high velocity (as fast as possible) to determine the angle of catch and release. The angle of movement arrest at slow velocity (XV1) and the angle of catch at fast speed (XV3) were recorded. The spasticity angle (X) was calculated as the difference between XV1 and XV3. Mean changes in Angles XV1, XV3 and X from baseline to Week 4 are reported.
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Spasticity Grade (Y) in Extrinsic Finger Flexors as PTMGAt Week 4The TS was used to measure spasticity in extrinsic finger flexors. The TS is administered by applying passive stretch to a muscle group. The spasticity grade (Y) assesses quality of muscle reaction on a 5-point scale (measured at fast speed): 0 =No resistance throughout passive movement, 1=slight resistance throughout passive movement, 2=clear catch at precise angle, interrupting passive movement, followed by release, 3=fatigable clonus (less than 10 seconds when maintaining pressure) occurring at a precise angle, followed by release. 4=unfatigable clonus (more than 10 seconds when maintaining pressure) occurring at precise angle. Mean changes in spasticity grade (Y) from baseline to Week 4 are reported.

Countries

Belgium, Czechia, France, Hungary, Italy, Poland, Russia, Slovakia, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The study was designed as a multicentre study and included a total of 34 investigational sites in Belgium, the Czech Republic, France, Hungary, Italy, Poland, Russia, Slovakia and the United States of America (US) that included at least one subject. This study was an open label extension to the double blind Study 145 (Y-52-52120-145).

Pre-assignment details

Of 227 subjects who completed Study 145, 4 subjects entered an observational phase and never received treatment with Dysport® in this open label extension study (Study 148). The remaining 223 subjects were eligible for retreatment and progressed to Study 148. In addition, 31 of the 34 de novo subjects screened were included in this study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Total Dysport®
A total of 254 subjects in the open label study received between 1 and 5 i.m. injections of Dysport® according to their individual needs, for a period of up to 12 months. All subjects were administered an appropriate dosage of Dysport® (1000 U or 500 U) on Day 1 of treatment Cycle 1. At each study visit from Week 12 onwards, subjects were assessed to determine whether a subsequent treatment cycle was required and treatment cycles were administered at intervals of a minimum of 12 weeks apart depending on the subject's safety and efficacy response. From Cycle 2 onwards, a total dose of 1500 U could be administered in subjects requiring treatment with Dysport® in their shoulder and other upper limb muscles. Subjects who showed improvement in their upper limb during the first two treatment cycles were able to receive concomitant injections of Dysport® 500 U into at least one calf muscle, from Cycle 3 onwards as long as the total dose did not exceed 1500 U.
254
Total254

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyAdverse Event5
Overall StudyDid Not Receive Treatment with Dysport®4
Overall StudyInvestigator Decision1
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy3
Overall StudyObservational Phase1
Overall StudySubject Withdrawn Early in Error4
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject18

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotal Dysport®
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
53 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
201 Participants
Age, Continuous52.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
16 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
238 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
7 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
27 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
218 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
91 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
163 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
142 / 254
serious
Total, serious adverse events
21 / 254

Outcome results

Primary

Assessment of the Long-term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

A TEAE was reported as emergent if it arose (i.e. started or worsened in severity) in the treatment phase after the subject received study medication. Adverse events of special interest (AESIs) were identified as those assessed as being due to remote spread of effect of Dysport®, or any adverse event (AE) that was assessed as a hypersensitivity reaction. TEAEs, AESIs, severe TEAEs, serious adverse events (SAEs), treatment related TEAEs, TEAEs leading to withdrawal and fatal SAEs are summarised by treatment cycle.

Time frame: Up to Week 52

Population: Subjects who entered the study and received at least one open label injection of Dysport® were evaluated for safety analysis. Only subjects with data available for analysis at the point of testing are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Total Dysport®Assessment of the Long-term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAEs: Cycle 1102 Participants
Total Dysport®Assessment of the Long-term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAEs: Cycle 262 Participants
Total Dysport®Assessment of the Long-term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAEs: Cycle 347 Participants
Total Dysport®Assessment of the Long-term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAEs: Cycle 411 Participants
Total Dysport®Assessment of the Long-term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAEs: Cycle 52 Participants
Total Dysport®Assessment of the Long-term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Treatment related TEAE: Cycle 118 Participants
Total Dysport®Assessment of the Long-term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Treatment related TEAE: Cycle 28 Participants
Total Dysport®Assessment of the Long-term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Treatment related TEAE: Cycle 35 Participants
Total Dysport®Assessment of the Long-term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Treatment related TEAE: Cycle 42 Participants
Total Dysport®Assessment of the Long-term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Treatment related TEAE: Cycle 50 Participants
Total Dysport®Assessment of the Long-term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Severe TEAEs: Cycle 114 Participants
Total Dysport®Assessment of the Long-term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Severe TEAEs: Cycle 28 Participants
Total Dysport®Assessment of the Long-term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Severe TEAEs: Cycle 34 Participants
Total Dysport®Assessment of the Long-term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Severe TEAEs: Cycle 41 Participants
Total Dysport®Assessment of the Long-term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Severe TEAEs: Cycle 50 Participants
Total Dysport®Assessment of the Long-term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAEs Leading to Withdrawal: Cycle 12 Participants
Total Dysport®Assessment of the Long-term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAEs Leading to Withdrawal: Cycle 21 Participants
Total Dysport®Assessment of the Long-term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAEs Leading to Withdrawal: Cycle 32 Participants
Total Dysport®Assessment of the Long-term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAEs Leading to Withdrawal: Cycle 40 Participants
Total Dysport®Assessment of the Long-term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAEs Leading to Withdrawal: Cycle 50 Participants
Total Dysport®Assessment of the Long-term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)AESIs: Cycle 12 Participants
Total Dysport®Assessment of the Long-term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)AESIs: Cycle 20 Participants
Total Dysport®Assessment of the Long-term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)AESIs: Cycle 30 Participants
Total Dysport®Assessment of the Long-term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)AESIs: Cycle 40 Participants
Total Dysport®Assessment of the Long-term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)AESIs: Cycle 50 Participants
Total Dysport®Assessment of the Long-term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)SAEs: Cycle 110 Participants
Total Dysport®Assessment of the Long-term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)SAEs: Cycle 26 Participants
Total Dysport®Assessment of the Long-term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)SAEs: Cycle 36 Participants
Total Dysport®Assessment of the Long-term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)SAEs: Cycle 41 Participants
Total Dysport®Assessment of the Long-term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)SAEs: Cycle 50 Participants
Total Dysport®Assessment of the Long-term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Fatal SAEs: Cycle 11 Participants
Total Dysport®Assessment of the Long-term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Fatal SAEs: Cycle 21 Participants
Total Dysport®Assessment of the Long-term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Fatal SAEs: Cycle 31 Participants
Total Dysport®Assessment of the Long-term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Fatal SAEs: Cycle 40 Participants
Total Dysport®Assessment of the Long-term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Fatal SAEs: Cycle 50 Participants
Primary

Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in 12 Lead ECG - HR

HR was measured by 12-lead ECG tracing, performed at baseline, at post treatment follow up visit Week 4, and at the end of study or early withdrawal visit. The 12-lead ECG recordings were performed at a paper speed of 25 mm/s, recorded with the subject in a supine position after 5 minutes rest.

Time frame: Up to Week 52

Population: The ECG analysis was performed in the safety population among subjects who had at least one ECG measurement before injection and at least one ECG after injection. Only subjects with data available for analysis at the point of testing are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in 12 Lead ECG - HRBaseline68.2 bpmStandard Deviation 11.3
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in 12 Lead ECG - HRChange from Baseline to EOS2.7 bpmStandard Deviation 10.5
Primary

Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG)

12-lead ECG tracing was performed at baseline, post treatment at Week 4 and at the end of study/early withdrawal visit. The 12-lead ECG recordings were performed at a paper speed of 25 mm/s, recorded with the subject in a supine position after 5 minutes rest. The ECG parameters reported were QRS duration, PR duration, QT duration, QTcB (QT interval corrected for HR according to Bazett), and QTcF (QT interval corrected for HR according to Fridericia) at baseline and the change to end of study/early withdrawal visit (EOS).

Time frame: Up to Week 52

Population: The ECG analysis was performed in the safety population among subjects who had at least one ECG measurement before injection and at least one ECG after injection. Only subjects with data available for analysis at the point of testing are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG)QT Duration - Baseline403.6 milliseconds (ms)Standard Deviation 31.9
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG)QT Duration - Change from Baseline to EOS-6.3 milliseconds (ms)Standard Deviation 22.1
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG)QTcF - Baseline417.8 milliseconds (ms)Standard Deviation 22.9
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG)QTcF - Change from Baseline to EOS-1 milliseconds (ms)Standard Deviation 15.5
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG)QTcB - Baseline425.6 milliseconds (ms)Standard Deviation 25.5
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG)QTcB - Change from Baseline to EOS1.9 milliseconds (ms)Standard Deviation 20.2
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG)QRS Duration - Baseline94.9 milliseconds (ms)Standard Deviation 15.3
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG)QRS Duration - Change from Baseline to EOS-0.4 milliseconds (ms)Standard Deviation 6.4
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG)PR Duration - Baseline165.6 milliseconds (ms)Standard Deviation 25.4
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG)PR Duration - Change from Baseline to EOS-0.3 milliseconds (ms)Standard Deviation 13.2
Primary

Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP), Gamma Glutamyl Transferase (GGT), Serum Glutamic Oxaloacetic Transaminase (SGOT) and Serum Glutamic Pyruvic Transaminase (SGPT)

Blood samples for analysis of the following clinical chemistry parameters: ALP, GGT, SGOT and SGPT were taken at baseline, at post treatment follow up visit Week 4, and at end of study/early withdrawal. Outcome measure is reported for number of subjects with data available for analysis.

Time frame: Up to Week 52

Population: Subjects who entered the study and received at least one open label injection of Dysport® were evaluated for safety analysis. Only subjects with data available for analysis at the point of testing are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP), Gamma Glutamyl Transferase (GGT), Serum Glutamic Oxaloacetic Transaminase (SGOT) and Serum Glutamic Pyruvic Transaminase (SGPT)ALP-0.6 International Unit/L (IU/L)
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP), Gamma Glutamyl Transferase (GGT), Serum Glutamic Oxaloacetic Transaminase (SGOT) and Serum Glutamic Pyruvic Transaminase (SGPT)SGOT1.4 International Unit/L (IU/L)
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP), Gamma Glutamyl Transferase (GGT), Serum Glutamic Oxaloacetic Transaminase (SGOT) and Serum Glutamic Pyruvic Transaminase (SGPT)SGPT1.2 International Unit/L (IU/L)
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP), Gamma Glutamyl Transferase (GGT), Serum Glutamic Oxaloacetic Transaminase (SGOT) and Serum Glutamic Pyruvic Transaminase (SGPT)GGT1.5 International Unit/L (IU/L)
Primary

Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN) and Fasting Blood Glucose

Blood samples for analysis of BUN and fasting blood glucose levels were taken at baseline, at post treatment follow up visit Week 4, and at end of study/early withdrawal.

Time frame: Up to Week 52

Population: Subjects who entered the study and received at least one open label injection of Dysport® were evaluated for safety analysis. Only subjects with data available for analysis at the point of testing are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN) and Fasting Blood GlucoseBUN-0.033 millimoles(mmol)/L
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN) and Fasting Blood GlucoseFasting Blood Glucose0.132 millimoles(mmol)/L
Primary

Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in Diastolic and Systolic Blood Pressure (BP)

Systolic and diastolic BP were recorded at screening, baseline and at each post baseline visit. Vital signs were measured with the subject in a sitting position after resting for 3 minutes. Outcome measure is reported for number of subjects with data available for analysis.

Time frame: Up to Week 52

Population: Subjects who entered the study and received at least one open label injection of Dysport® were evaluated for safety analysis. Only subjects with data available for analysis at the point of testing are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in Diastolic and Systolic Blood Pressure (BP)Diastolic BP0 Millimeters of Mercury (mm Hg)
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in Diastolic and Systolic Blood Pressure (BP)Systolic BP-2.8 Millimeters of Mercury (mm Hg)
Primary

Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in Haematocrit

Blood samples for haematocrit were taken at baseline, at post treatment follow up visit Week 4, and at end of study/early withdrawal. Outcome measure is reported for number of subjects with data available for analysis.

Time frame: Up to Week 52

Population: Subjects who entered the study and received at least one open label injection of Dysport® were evaluated for safety analysis. Only subjects with data available for analysis at the point of testing are reported.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in Haematocrit-0.0011 percentage of RBC in blood
Primary

Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in Haemoglobin and Mean Corpuscular Haemoglobin Concentration (MCHC)

Blood samples for haemoglobin and MCHC were taken at baseline, at post treatment follow up visit Week 4, and at the end of study/early withdrawal. Outcome measure is reported for number of subjects with data available for analysis.

Time frame: Up to Week 52

Population: Subjects who entered the study and received at least one open label injection of Dysport® were evaluated for safety analysis. Only subjects with data available for analysis at the point of testing are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in Haemoglobin and Mean Corpuscular Haemoglobin Concentration (MCHC)Haemoglobin-0.7 grams(g)/L
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in Haemoglobin and Mean Corpuscular Haemoglobin Concentration (MCHC)MCHC-0.8 grams(g)/L
Primary

Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in Heart Rate (HR)

HR was recorded at screening, baseline and at each post baseline visit. Vital signs were measured with the subject in a sitting position after resting for 3 minutes. Outcome measure is reported for number of subjects with data available for analysis.

Time frame: Up to Week 52

Population: Subjects who entered the study and received at least one open label injection of Dysport® were evaluated for safety analysis. Only subjects with data available for analysis at the point of testing are reported.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in Heart Rate (HR)2.5 Beats per minute (bpm)
Primary

Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in Mean Corpuscular Haemoglobin (MCH)

Blood samples for MCH were taken at baseline, at post treatment follow up visit Week 4, and at end of study/early withdrawal. Outcome measure is reported for number of subjects with data available for analysis.

Time frame: Up to Week 52

Population: Subjects who entered the study and received at least one open label injection of Dysport® were evaluated for safety analysis. Only subjects with data available for analysis at the point of testing are reported.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in Mean Corpuscular Haemoglobin (MCH)-0.33 picograms (pg)
Primary

Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in Mean Corpuscular Volume (MCV)

Blood samples for MCV were taken at baseline, at post treatment follow up visit Week 4, and at end of study/early withdrawal. Outcome measure is reported for number of subjects with data available for analysis.

Time frame: Up to Week 52

Population: Subjects who entered the study and received at least one open label injection of Dysport® were evaluated for safety analysis. Only subjects with data available for analysis at the point of testing are reported.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in Mean Corpuscular Volume (MCV)-0.77 femtoliters (fL)
Primary

Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in Red Blood Cell (RBC) Count

Blood samples for RBC count were taken at baseline, at post treatment follow up visit Week 4, and at end of study/early withdrawal. Outcome measure is reported for number of subjects with data available for analysis.

Time frame: Up to Week 52

Population: Subjects who entered the study and received at least one open label injection of Dysport® were evaluated for safety analysis. Only subjects with data available for analysis at the point of testing are reported.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in Red Blood Cell (RBC) Count0.03 Tera cells/Litre (L)
Primary

Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in Total Bilirubin and Creatinine

Blood samples for clinical chemistry analysis of total bilirubin and creatinine were taken at baseline, at post treatment follow up visit Week 4, and at end of study/early withdrawal. Outcome measure is reported for number of subjects with data available for analysis.

Time frame: Up to Week 52

Population: Subjects who entered the study and received at least one open label injection of Dysport® were evaluated for safety analysis. Only subjects with data available for analysis at the point of testing are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in Total Bilirubin and CreatinineTotal Bilirubin-0.27 Micromole/L (μmol/L)
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in Total Bilirubin and CreatinineCreatinine-3.7 Micromole/L (μmol/L)
Primary

Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in White Blood Cell (WBC) Count, Neutrophils, Lymphocytes and Platelets

Blood samples for WBC count with differentials (neutrophils, lymphocytes) and platelet count were taken at baseline, at post treatment follow up visit Week 4, and at end of study or early withdrawal.

Time frame: Up to Week 52

Population: Subjects who entered the study and received at least one open label injection of Dysport® were evaluated for safety analysis. Only subjects with data available for analysis at the point of testing are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in White Blood Cell (WBC) Count, Neutrophils, Lymphocytes and PlateletsWBC count0.04 Giga cells/L
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in White Blood Cell (WBC) Count, Neutrophils, Lymphocytes and PlateletsNeutrophils0 Giga cells/L
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in White Blood Cell (WBC) Count, Neutrophils, Lymphocytes and PlateletsLymphocytes0.01 Giga cells/L
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in White Blood Cell (WBC) Count, Neutrophils, Lymphocytes and PlateletsPlatelets3.2 Giga cells/L
Primary

Number of Subjects With Botulinum Toxin A Binding and Neutralising Putative Antibodies

Blood samples were collected at baseline, Week 4 of each cycle, and at the end of study/early withdrawal to test for the presence of Botulinum Toxin A Binding antibodies. Samples positive for the presence of binding antibodies were then analysed for the presence of neutralising putative antibodies. The number of subjects who were either positive (+ve) or negative (-ve) at baseline and then positive post baseline for binding or neutralising antibodies were reported.

Time frame: Up to Week 52

Population: Binding and neutralising antibodies were evaluated at baseline for all 258 subjects (rollover and de novo) enrolled in Study 148. Only subjects with data available for analysis at the point of testing are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Total Dysport®Number of Subjects With Botulinum Toxin A Binding and Neutralising Putative AntibodiesBinding +ve at baseline5 Participants
Total Dysport®Number of Subjects With Botulinum Toxin A Binding and Neutralising Putative AntibodiesBinding -ve at baseline & +ve post baseline20 Participants
Total Dysport®Number of Subjects With Botulinum Toxin A Binding and Neutralising Putative AntibodiesNeutralising +ve at baseline4 Participants
Total Dysport®Number of Subjects With Botulinum Toxin A Binding and Neutralising Putative AntibodiesNeutralising -ve at baseline & +ve post baseline11 Participants
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline at Week 4 in Ease of Applying a Splint

The ease of applying a splint was evaluated on a 6-point scale (0= no splint needed, -1= splint needed and applied with no difficulty, -2= splint needed and applied with mild difficulty, -3= splint needed and applied with moderate difficulty, -4= splint needed and applied with severe difficulty, -5= splint needed,but unable to apply). Mean change in ease of applying a splint from baseline to Week 4 was reported.

Time frame: At Week 4

Population: The ITT population was defined as all enrolled subjects who received at least one injection of study medication in this open label extension study. Too few subjects were treated in Cycle 5 to allow direct comparisons with other cycles and are not reported. Only subjects with data available for analysis at the point of testing are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline at Week 4 in Ease of Applying a SplintCycle 1-0.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline at Week 4 in Ease of Applying a SplintCycle 2-0.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.3
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline at Week 4 in Ease of Applying a SplintCycle 3-0.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.4
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline at Week 4 in Ease of Applying a SplintCycle 4-0.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in Active Range of Motion (AROM) at Week 4 in the 3 Possible PTMGs

The AROM was assessed by the range of extension achieved by the subject moving each joint in the PTMGs (extrinsic finger flexors, elbow flexors and wrist flexors) without assistance. A goniometer was used for measurements in the elbow and wrist flexors but not for measurements in the extrinsic finger flexors. Mean changes in AROM in the 3 possible PTMGs from baseline to Week 4 are reported.

Time frame: At Week 4

Population: The ITT population was defined as all enrolled subjects who received at least one injection of study medication in this open label extension study. Too few subjects were treated in Cycle 5 to allow direct comparisons with other cycles and are not reported. Only subjects with data available for analysis at the point of testing are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline in Active Range of Motion (AROM) at Week 4 in the 3 Possible PTMGsExtrinsic Finger Flexors: Cycle 131.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 40.9
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline in Active Range of Motion (AROM) at Week 4 in the 3 Possible PTMGsExtrinsic Finger Flexors: Cycle 234.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 45
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline in Active Range of Motion (AROM) at Week 4 in the 3 Possible PTMGsExtrinsic Finger Flexors: Cycle 333.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 47.1
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline in Active Range of Motion (AROM) at Week 4 in the 3 Possible PTMGsExtrinsic Finger Flexors: Cycle 438 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 53.4
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline in Active Range of Motion (AROM) at Week 4 in the 3 Possible PTMGsElbow Flexors: Cycle 110.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.5
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline in Active Range of Motion (AROM) at Week 4 in the 3 Possible PTMGsElbow Flexors: Cycle 217.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.3
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline in Active Range of Motion (AROM) at Week 4 in the 3 Possible PTMGsElbow Flexors: Cycle 314.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.1
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline in Active Range of Motion (AROM) at Week 4 in the 3 Possible PTMGsElbow Flexors: Cycle 413.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.6
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline in Active Range of Motion (AROM) at Week 4 in the 3 Possible PTMGsWrist Flexors: Cycle 117.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.6
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline in Active Range of Motion (AROM) at Week 4 in the 3 Possible PTMGsWrist Flexors: Cycle 223 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 32.7
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline in Active Range of Motion (AROM) at Week 4 in the 3 Possible PTMGsWrist Flexors: Cycle 322 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 30.9
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline in Active Range of Motion (AROM) at Week 4 in the 3 Possible PTMGsWrist Flexors: Cycle 43 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.1
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in Disability Assessment Scale (DAS) Score for the Principal Target of Treatment (PTT) at Week 4

At baseline the subject and investigator together selected one of the four DAS domains as the PTT. The selected domain was required to have a rating of moderate or severe (≥2) at baseline. The DAS is a 4-point scale, the extent of functional impairment in 4 functional domains (dressing, hygiene, limb position and pain) was rated as follows: 0=no disability, 1=mild disability (noticeable but does not interfere significantly with normal activities), 2=moderate disability (normal activities require increased effort and/or assistance) and 3=severe disability (normal activities limited). The mean changes in DAS at Week 4 are reported.

Time frame: At Week 4

Population: The ITT population was defined as all enrolled subjects who received at least one injection of study medication in this open label extension study. Too few subjects were treated in Cycle 5 to allow direct comparisons with other cycles and are not reported. Only subjects with data available for analysis at the point of testing are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline in Disability Assessment Scale (DAS) Score for the Principal Target of Treatment (PTT) at Week 4Cycle 1-0.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline in Disability Assessment Scale (DAS) Score for the Principal Target of Treatment (PTT) at Week 4Cycle 2-1.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline in Disability Assessment Scale (DAS) Score for the Principal Target of Treatment (PTT) at Week 4Cycle 3-1.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline in Disability Assessment Scale (DAS) Score for the Principal Target of Treatment (PTT) at Week 4Cycle 4-1.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in European 5 Dimensions, 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) QoL at End of Study/Early Withdrawal Visit

Subjects were asked to complete the EQ-5D-5L QoL questionnaires prior to the study treatment at baseline and at the end of study/early withdrawal visit. The EQ-5D-5L index is a generic preference based measure of health related QoL producing utility scores that represent subject preferences for particular health states. This instrument rated subject health state looking at 5 specific dimensions such as mobility, self-care, usual activity, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression and scored their general health state. Each dimension has 5 levels of severity (no problems, slight problems,moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems). In addition, a visual analogue scale (VAS) ranging from 0 to 100 was also included for the patients to summarize their overall health status, where 0 is the worst and 100 the best possible health state. The mean values for each dimension and the VAS scores at baseline and at the end of-study /early withdrawal are reported.

Time frame: Up to Week 52

Population: The ITT population was defined as all enrolled subjects who received at least one injection of study medication in this open label extension study. Too few subjects were treated in Cycle 5 to allow direct comparisons with other cycles and are not reported. Only subjects with data available for analysis at the point of testing are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline in European 5 Dimensions, 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) QoL at End of Study/Early Withdrawal VisitAnxiety/Depression Baseline1.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline in European 5 Dimensions, 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) QoL at End of Study/Early Withdrawal VisitAnxiety/Depression Change-0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline in European 5 Dimensions, 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) QoL at End of Study/Early Withdrawal VisitMobility Baseline2.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline in European 5 Dimensions, 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) QoL at End of Study/Early Withdrawal VisitMobility Change0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline in European 5 Dimensions, 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) QoL at End of Study/Early Withdrawal VisitPain/Discomfort Baseline2.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline in European 5 Dimensions, 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) QoL at End of Study/Early Withdrawal VisitPain/Discomfort Change-0.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline in European 5 Dimensions, 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) QoL at End of Study/Early Withdrawal VisitSelf-Care Baseline2.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline in European 5 Dimensions, 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) QoL at End of Study/Early Withdrawal VisitSelf-Care Change0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline in European 5 Dimensions, 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) QoL at End of Study/Early Withdrawal VisitUsual Activities Baseline2.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline in European 5 Dimensions, 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) QoL at End of Study/Early Withdrawal VisitUsual Activities Change-0.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline in European 5 Dimensions, 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) QoL at End of Study/Early Withdrawal VisitVAS Baseline63.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.7
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline in European 5 Dimensions, 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) QoL at End of Study/Early Withdrawal VisitVAS Change2.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in Modified Frenchay Scale (MFS) at Week 4

The MFS was used to measure upper limb active function. Each subject was video taped while performing specific tasks. The videos were sent to a central provider and were read and scored by two independent readers blinded to the timing of the video and to treatment. These central assessments were used for the analysis of efficacy endpoints. The MFS consists of 10 tasks asking the subject to reach, grasp, carry and release different objects of different sizes which subjects are likely to use in their daily life. Each of these tasks was rated on a 10 point scale ranging from no movement to normal movement; for each task, the score 5 is used to rate a task barely accomplished. Mean change in MFS from baseline to Week 4 was reported.

Time frame: At Week 4

Population: The ITT population was defined as all enrolled subjects who received at least one injection of study medication in this open label extension study. Too few subjects were treated in Cycle 5 to allow direct comparisons with other cycles and are not reported. Only subjects with data available for analysis at the point of testing are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline in Modified Frenchay Scale (MFS) at Week 4Cycle 10.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.77
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline in Modified Frenchay Scale (MFS) at Week 4Cycle 20.51 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline in Modified Frenchay Scale (MFS) at Week 4Cycle 30.44 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.82
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline in Modified Frenchay Scale (MFS) at Week 4Cycle 40.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.75
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36) Quality of Life (QoL) at End of Study/Early Withdrawal Visit

Subjects were asked to complete the SF-36 questionnaires prior to the study treatment at baseline and at the end of study/early withdrawal visit. The SF-36 is a generic non-preference based health status measure. This instrument assessed subject health across 8 variable dimensions, which are specific health domains such as physical functioning, social functioning and vitality. Each variable item score is coded and turned into a 0-100 scale where 0 indicates the worst and 100 indicates the best possible health state for both the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) of the questionnaire. Baseline results and the change from baseline to end of study/early withdrawal for the PCS and MCS are reported.

Time frame: Up to Week 52

Population: The ITT population was defined as all enrolled subjects who received at least one injection of study medication in this open label extension study. Too few subjects were treated in Cycle 5 to allow direct comparisons with other cycles and are not reported. Only subjects with data available for analysis at the point of testing are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline in Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36) Quality of Life (QoL) at End of Study/Early Withdrawal VisitPCS Baseline37.49 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.94
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline in Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36) Quality of Life (QoL) at End of Study/Early Withdrawal VisitPCS Change1.07 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.76
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline in Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36) Quality of Life (QoL) at End of Study/Early Withdrawal VisitMCS Baseline46.88 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.09
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline in Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36) Quality of Life (QoL) at End of Study/Early Withdrawal VisitMCS Change0.96 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.11
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline MAS in the Elbow Flexors at Week 4

The clinical assessment of muscle tone was performed using the MAS. The MAS consists of 6 grades: 0, 1, 1+, 2, 3, or 4 that can be applied to muscles of both the upper and lower limbs. The MAS was applied by the rater by stretching the joint through its full available range over 1 second. The mean changes from baseline to Week 4 in MAS in the elbow flexors are reported.

Time frame: At Week 4

Population: The ITT population was defined as all enrolled subjects who received at least one injection of study medication in this open label extension study. Too few subjects were treated in Cycle 5 to allow direct comparisons with other cycles and are not reported. Only subjects with data available for analysis at the point of testing are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline MAS in the Elbow Flexors at Week 4Cycle 1-1.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline MAS in the Elbow Flexors at Week 4Cycle 2-1.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline MAS in the Elbow Flexors at Week 4Cycle 3-1.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline MAS in the Elbow Flexors at Week 4Cycle 4-0.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline MAS in the Extrinsic Finger Flexors at Week 4

The clinical assessment of muscle tone was performed using the MAS. The MAS consists of 6 grades: 0, 1, 1+, 2, 3, or 4 that can be applied to muscles of both the upper and lower limbs. The MAS was applied by the rater by stretching the joint through its full available range over 1 second. The mean changes from baseline to Week 4 in MAS in the extrinsic finger flexors are reported.

Time frame: At Week 4

Population: The ITT population was defined as all enrolled subjects who received at least one injection of study medication in this open label extension study. Too few subjects were treated in Cycle 5 to allow direct comparisons with other cycles and are not reported. Only subjects with data available for analysis at the point of testing are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline MAS in the Extrinsic Finger Flexors at Week 4Cycle 1-1.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline MAS in the Extrinsic Finger Flexors at Week 4Cycle 2-1.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.2
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline MAS in the Extrinsic Finger Flexors at Week 4Cycle 3-1.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.3
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline MAS in the Extrinsic Finger Flexors at Week 4Cycle 4-1.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.2
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline MAS in the Shoulder Extensors at Week 4

The clinical assessment of muscle tone was performed using the MAS. The MAS consists of 6 grades: 0, 1, 1+, 2, 3, or 4 that can be applied to muscles of both the upper and lower limbs. The MAS was applied by the rater by stretching the joint through its full available range over 1 second. The mean changes from baseline to Week 4 in MAS in the shoulder extensors are reported.

Time frame: At Week 4

Population: The ITT population was defined as all enrolled subjects who received at least one injection of study medication in this open label extension study. Too few subjects were treated in Cycle 5 to allow direct comparisons with other cycles and are not reported. Only subjects with data available for analysis at the point of testing are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline MAS in the Shoulder Extensors at Week 4Cycle 1-0.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline MAS in the Shoulder Extensors at Week 4Cycle 2-0.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline MAS in the Shoulder Extensors at Week 4Cycle 3-0.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline MAS in the Shoulder Extensors at Week 4Cycle 4-0.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline MAS in the Wrist Flexors at Week 4

The clinical assessment of muscle tone was performed using the MAS. The MAS consists of 6 grades: 0, 1, 1+, 2, 3, or 4 that can be applied to muscles of both the upper and lower limbs. The MAS was applied by the rater by stretching the joint through its full available range over 1 second. The mean changes from baseline to Week 4 in MAS in the wrist flexors are reported.

Time frame: At Week 4

Population: The ITT population was defined as all enrolled subjects who received at least one injection of study medication in this open label extension study. Too few subjects were treated in Cycle 5 to allow direct comparisons with other cycles and are not reported. Only subjects with data available for analysis at the point of testing are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline MAS in the Wrist Flexors at Week 4Cycle 1-1.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.2
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline MAS in the Wrist Flexors at Week 4Cycle 2-1.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.3
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline MAS in the Wrist Flexors at Week 4Cycle 3-1.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.3
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline MAS in the Wrist Flexors at Week 4Cycle 4-1.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.2
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) in the Overall Primary Targeted Muscle Group (PTMG) for Upper Limb at Week 4

The clinical assessment of muscle tone was performed using the MAS. The MAS consists of 6 grades: 0, 1, 1+, 2, 3, or 4 that can be applied to muscles of both the upper and lower limbs. The MAS was applied by the rater by stretching the joint through its full available range over 1 second. The mean changes from baseline to Week 4 in MAS in the overall PTMG (finger, wrist or elbow flexors) are reported.

Time frame: At Week 4

Population: The Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population was all enrolled subjects who received at least one injection of study medication in this open label extension study. Too few subjects were treated in Cycle 5 to allow direct comparisons with other cycles and are not reported. Only subjects with data available for analysis at the point of testing are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) in the Overall Primary Targeted Muscle Group (PTMG) for Upper Limb at Week 4Cycle 1-1.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) in the Overall Primary Targeted Muscle Group (PTMG) for Upper Limb at Week 4Cycle 2-1.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.2
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) in the Overall Primary Targeted Muscle Group (PTMG) for Upper Limb at Week 4Cycle 3-1.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) in the Overall Primary Targeted Muscle Group (PTMG) for Upper Limb at Week 4Cycle 4-1.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Angle of Spasticity (X) in Elbow Flexors as PTMG

The TS was used to measure spasticity in elbow flexors. The TS is administered by applying passive stretch to a muscle group at two velocities. Slow speed of muscle stretch measures the range of passive motion. During a slow stretching movement, the examiner determines the angle of movement arrest, either due to subject discomfort or a mechanical resistance. The same movement is repeated at high velocity (as fast as possible) to determine the angle of catch and release. The angle of movement arrest at slow velocity (XV1) and the angle of catch at fast speed (XV3) were recorded. The spasticity angle (X) was calculated as the difference between XV1 and XV3. Mean changes in Angles XV1, XV3 and X from baseline to Week 4 are reported.

Time frame: At Week 4

Population: The ITT population was defined as all enrolled subjects who received at least one injection of study medication in this open label extension study. Too few subjects were treated in Cycle 5 to allow direct comparisons with other cycles and are not reported. Only subjects with data available for analysis at the point of testing are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Angle of Spasticity (X) in Elbow Flexors as PTMGAngle of Spasticity (X) - Cycle 1-26.4 DegreesStandard Deviation 24.9
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Angle of Spasticity (X) in Elbow Flexors as PTMGAngle of Spasticity (X) -Cycle 2-31 DegreesStandard Deviation 27.7
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Angle of Spasticity (X) in Elbow Flexors as PTMGAngle of Spasticity (X) -Cycle 3-33.3 DegreesStandard Deviation 26
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Angle of Spasticity (X) in Elbow Flexors as PTMGAngle of Spasticity (X) -Cycle 4-46.4 DegreesStandard Deviation 17.3
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Angle of Spasticity (X) in Elbow Flexors as PTMGAngle of Arrest (XV1) - Cycle 1-0.4 DegreesStandard Deviation 14.9
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Angle of Spasticity (X) in Elbow Flexors as PTMGAngle of Arrest (XV1) - Cycle 21.3 DegreesStandard Deviation 13.3
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Angle of Spasticity (X) in Elbow Flexors as PTMGAngle of arrest (XV1) - Cycle 32.2 DegreesStandard Deviation 10.6
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Angle of Spasticity (X) in Elbow Flexors as PTMGAngle of Arrest (XV1) - Cycle 4-2.5 DegreesStandard Deviation 9.4
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Angle of Spasticity (X) in Elbow Flexors as PTMGAngle of Catch (XV3) - Cycle 126.0 DegreesStandard Deviation 26.1
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Angle of Spasticity (X) in Elbow Flexors as PTMGAngle of Catch (XV3) - Cycle 232.3 DegreesStandard Deviation 28.8
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Angle of Spasticity (X) in Elbow Flexors as PTMGAngle of Catch (XV3) - Cycle 335.5 DegreesStandard Deviation 27.3
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Angle of Spasticity (X) in Elbow Flexors as PTMGAngle of Catch (XV3) - Cycle 443.9 DegreesStandard Deviation 23.1
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Angle of Spasticity (X) in Extrinsic Finger Flexors as PTMG

The Tardieu Scale (TS) was used to measure spasticity in extrinsic finger flexors. The TS is administered by applying passive stretch to a muscle group at two velocities. Slow speed of muscle stretch measures the range of passive motion. During a slow stretching movement, the examiner determines the angle of movement arrest, either due to subject discomfort or a mechanical resistance. The same movement is repeated at high velocity (as fast as possible) to determine the angle of catch and release. The angle of movement arrest at slow velocity (XV1) and the angle of catch at fast speed (XV3) were recorded. The spasticity angle (X) was calculated as the difference between XV1 and XV3. Mean changes in Angles XV1, XV3 and X from baseline to Week 4 are reported.

Time frame: At Week 4

Population: The ITT population was defined as all enrolled subjects who received at least one injection of study medication in this open label extension study. Too few subjects were treated in Cycle 5 to allow direct comparisons with other cycles and are not reported. Only subjects with data available for analysis at the point of testing are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Angle of Spasticity (X) in Extrinsic Finger Flexors as PTMGAngle of Spasticity (X) - Cycle 1-33.5 DegreesStandard Deviation 54
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Angle of Spasticity (X) in Extrinsic Finger Flexors as PTMGAngle of Spasticity (X) - Cycle 2-33.9 DegreesStandard Deviation 55.9
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Angle of Spasticity (X) in Extrinsic Finger Flexors as PTMGAngle of Spasticity (X) - Cycle 3-43.3 DegreesStandard Deviation 57.8
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Angle of Spasticity (X) in Extrinsic Finger Flexors as PTMGAngle of Spasticity (X) - Cycle 4-35.9 DegreesStandard Deviation 48
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Angle of Spasticity (X) in Extrinsic Finger Flexors as PTMGAngle of Arrest (XV1) - Cycle 124.3 DegreesStandard Deviation 36.1
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Angle of Spasticity (X) in Extrinsic Finger Flexors as PTMGAngle of Arrest (XV1) - Cycle 225.9 DegreesStandard Deviation 36.5
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Angle of Spasticity (X) in Extrinsic Finger Flexors as PTMGAngle of Arrest (XV1) - Cycle 324.9 DegreesStandard Deviation 38.7
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Angle of Spasticity (X) in Extrinsic Finger Flexors as PTMGAngle of Arrest (XV1) - Cycle 421.8 DegreesStandard Deviation 39.6
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Angle of Spasticity (X) in Extrinsic Finger Flexors as PTMGAngle of Catch (XV3) - Cycle 157.8 DegreesStandard Deviation 55.1
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Angle of Spasticity (X) in Extrinsic Finger Flexors as PTMGAngle of Catch (XV3) - Cycle 259.8 DegreesStandard Deviation 57.8
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Angle of Spasticity (X) in Extrinsic Finger Flexors as PTMGAngle of Catch (XV3) - Cycle 368.2 DegreesStandard Deviation 55.6
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Angle of Spasticity (X) in Extrinsic Finger Flexors as PTMGAngle of Catch (XV3) - Cycle 457.7 DegreesStandard Deviation 52.6
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Angle of Spasticity (X) in Shoulder Extensors

The TS was used to measure spasticity in shoulder extensors. The TS is administered by applying passive stretch to a muscle group at two velocities. Slow speed of muscle stretch measures the range of passive motion. During a slow stretching movement, the examiner determines the angle of movement arrest, either due to subject discomfort or a mechanical resistance. The same movement is repeated at high velocity (as fast as possible) to determine the angle of catch and release. The angle of movement arrest at slow velocity (XV1) and the angle of catch at fast speed (XV3) were recorded. The spasticity angle (X) was calculated as the difference between XV1 and XV3. Mean changes in Angles XV1, XV3 and X from baseline to Week 4 are reported.

Time frame: At Week 4

Population: The ITT population was defined as all enrolled subjects who received at least one injection of study medication in this open label extension study. Too few subjects were treated in Cycle 5 to allow direct comparisons with other cycles and are not reported. Only subjects with data available for analysis at the point of testing are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Angle of Spasticity (X) in Shoulder ExtensorsAngle of Spasticity (X) - Cycle 1-13.3 DegreesStandard Deviation 24.6
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Angle of Spasticity (X) in Shoulder ExtensorsAngle of Spasticity (X) - Cycle 2-10.8 DegreesStandard Deviation 30.1
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Angle of Spasticity (X) in Shoulder ExtensorsAngle of Spasticity (X) - Cycle 3-6.4 DegreesStandard Deviation 23.5
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Angle of Spasticity (X) in Shoulder ExtensorsAngle of Spasticity (X) - Cycle 4-7.2 DegreesStandard Deviation 27.4
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Angle of Spasticity (X) in Shoulder ExtensorsAngle of Arrest (XV1) - Cycle 17.2 DegreesStandard Deviation 16
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Angle of Spasticity (X) in Shoulder ExtensorsAngle of Arrest (XV1) - Cycle 26.4 DegreesStandard Deviation 23
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Angle of Spasticity (X) in Shoulder ExtensorsAngle of Arrest (XV1) - Cycle 310.7 DegreesStandard Deviation 23.8
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Angle of Spasticity (X) in Shoulder ExtensorsAngle of Arrest (XV1) - Cycle 410.8 DegreesStandard Deviation 26.1
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Angle of Spasticity (X) in Shoulder ExtensorsAngle of Catch (XV3) - Cycle 120.5 DegreesStandard Deviation 22.7
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Angle of Spasticity (X) in Shoulder ExtensorsAngle of Catch (XV3) - Cycle 217.2 DegreesStandard Deviation 26.9
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Angle of Spasticity (X) in Shoulder ExtensorsAngle of Catch (XV3) - Cycle 317.1 DegreesStandard Deviation 24.5
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Angle of Spasticity (X) in Shoulder ExtensorsAngle of Catch (XV3) - Cycle 418.0 DegreesStandard Deviation 19.6
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Angle of Spasticity (X) in Wrist Flexors as PTMG

The TS was used to measure spasticity in wrist flexors. The TS is administered by applying passive stretch to a muscle group at two velocities. Slow speed of muscle stretch measures the range of passive motion. During a slow stretching movement, the examiner determines the angle of movement arrest, either due to subject discomfort or a mechanical resistance. The same movement is repeated at high velocity (as fast as possible) to determine the angle of catch and release. The angle of movement arrest at slow velocity (XV1) and the angle of catch at fast speed (XV3) were recorded. The spasticity angle (X) was calculated as the difference between XV1 and XV3. Mean changes in Angles XV1, XV3 and X from baseline to Week 4 are reported.

Time frame: At Week 4

Population: The ITT population was defined as all enrolled subjects who received at least one injection of study medication in this open label extension study. Too few subjects were treated in Cycle 5 to allow direct comparisons with other cycles and are not reported. Only subjects with data available for analysis at the point of testing are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Angle of Spasticity (X) in Wrist Flexors as PTMGAngle of Spasticity (X) - Cycle 1-23.3 DegreesStandard Deviation 32.5
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Angle of Spasticity (X) in Wrist Flexors as PTMGAngle of Spasticity (X) - Cycle 2-28.8 DegreesStandard Deviation 37.1
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Angle of Spasticity (X) in Wrist Flexors as PTMGAngle of Spasticity (X) - Cycle 3-21.7 DegreesStandard Deviation 35.2
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Angle of Spasticity (X) in Wrist Flexors as PTMGAngle of Spasticity (X) - Cycle 4-13.5 DegreesStandard Deviation 29.3
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Angle of Spasticity (X) in Wrist Flexors as PTMGAngle of Arrest (XV1) - Cycle 112.6 DegreesStandard Deviation 21.3
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Angle of Spasticity (X) in Wrist Flexors as PTMGAngle of Arrest (XV1) - Cycle 216.4 DegreesStandard Deviation 23.9
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Angle of Spasticity (X) in Wrist Flexors as PTMGAngle of Arrest (XV1) - Cycle 318.6 DegreesStandard Deviation 30.6
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Angle of Spasticity (X) in Wrist Flexors as PTMGAngle of Arrest (XV1) - Cycle 419.0 DegreesStandard Deviation 24.8
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Angle of Spasticity (X) in Wrist Flexors as PTMGAngle of Catch (XV3) - Cycle 135.9 DegreesStandard Deviation 35
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Angle of Spasticity (X) in Wrist Flexors as PTMGAngle of Catch (XV3) - Cycle 245.2 DegreesStandard Deviation 37.7
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Angle of Spasticity (X) in Wrist Flexors as PTMGAngle of Catch (XV3) - Cycle 340.3 DegreesStandard Deviation 33.3
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Angle of Spasticity (X) in Wrist Flexors as PTMGAngle of Catch (XV3) - Cycle 432.5 DegreesStandard Deviation 28.1
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Spasticity Grade (Y) in Elbow Flexors as PTMG

The TS was used to measure spasticity in elbow flexors.The TS is administered by applying passive stretch to a muscle group. The spasticity grade (Y) assesses quality of muscle reaction on a 5-point scale (measured at fast speed): 0 =No resistance throughout passive movement, 1=slight resistance throughout passive movement, 2=clear catch at precise angle, interrupting passive movement, followed by release, 3=fatigable clonus (less than 10 seconds when maintaining pressure) occurring at a precise angle, followed by release. 4=unfatigable clonus (more than 10 seconds when maintaining pressure) occurring at precise angle. Mean changes in spasticity grade (Y) from baseline to Week 4 are reported.

Time frame: At Week 4

Population: The ITT population was defined as all enrolled subjects who received at least one injection of study medication in this open label extension study. Too few subjects were treated in Cycle 5 to allow direct comparisons with other cycles and are not reported. Only subjects with data available for analysis at the point of testing are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Spasticity Grade (Y) in Elbow Flexors as PTMGCycle 1-0.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Spasticity Grade (Y) in Elbow Flexors as PTMGCycle 2-0.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Spasticity Grade (Y) in Elbow Flexors as PTMGCycle 3-0.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Spasticity Grade (Y) in Elbow Flexors as PTMGCycle 4-0.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Spasticity Grade (Y) in Extrinsic Finger Flexors as PTMG

The TS was used to measure spasticity in extrinsic finger flexors. The TS is administered by applying passive stretch to a muscle group. The spasticity grade (Y) assesses quality of muscle reaction on a 5-point scale (measured at fast speed): 0 =No resistance throughout passive movement, 1=slight resistance throughout passive movement, 2=clear catch at precise angle, interrupting passive movement, followed by release, 3=fatigable clonus (less than 10 seconds when maintaining pressure) occurring at a precise angle, followed by release. 4=unfatigable clonus (more than 10 seconds when maintaining pressure) occurring at precise angle. Mean changes in spasticity grade (Y) from baseline to Week 4 are reported.

Time frame: At Week 4

Population: The ITT population was defined as all enrolled subjects who received at least one injection of study medication in this open label extension study. Too few subjects were treated in Cycle 5 to allow direct comparisons with other cycles and are not reported. Only subjects with data available for analysis at the point of testing are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Spasticity Grade (Y) in Extrinsic Finger Flexors as PTMGCycle 1-0.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Spasticity Grade (Y) in Extrinsic Finger Flexors as PTMGCycle 2-0.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Spasticity Grade (Y) in Extrinsic Finger Flexors as PTMGCycle 3-0.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Spasticity Grade (Y) in Extrinsic Finger Flexors as PTMGCycle 4-0.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Spasticity Grade (Y) in Shoulder Extensors

The TS was used to measure spasticity in shoulder extensors. The TS is administered by applying passive stretch to a muscle group. The spasticity grade (Y) assesses quality of muscle reaction on a 5-point scale (measured at fast speed): 0 =No resistance throughout passive movement, 1=slight resistance throughout passive movement, 2=clear catch at precise angle, interrupting passive movement, followed by release, 3=fatigable clonus (less than 10 seconds when maintaining pressure) occurring at a precise angle, followed by release. 4=unfatigable clonus (more than 10 seconds when maintaining pressure) occurring at precise angle. Mean changes in spasticity grade (Y) from baseline to Week 4 are reported.

Time frame: At Week 4

Population: The ITT population was defined as all enrolled subjects who received at least one injection of study medication in this open label extension study. Too few subjects were treated in Cycle 5 to allow direct comparisons with other cycles and are not reported. Only subjects with data available for analysis at the point of testing are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Spasticity Grade (Y) in Shoulder ExtensorsCycle 1-0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.4
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Spasticity Grade (Y) in Shoulder ExtensorsCycle 2-0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Spasticity Grade (Y) in Shoulder ExtensorsCycle 3-0.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Spasticity Grade (Y) in Shoulder ExtensorsCycle 4-0.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Spasticity Grade (Y) in Wrist Flexors as PTMG

The TS was used to measure spasticity in wrist flexors. The TS is administered by applying passive stretch to a muscle group. The spasticity grade (Y) assesses quality of muscle reaction on a 5-point scale (measured at fast speed): 0 =No resistance throughout passive movement, 1=slight resistance throughout passive movement, 2=clear catch at precise angle, interrupting passive movement, followed by release, 3=fatigable clonus (less than 10 seconds when maintaining pressure) occurring at a precise angle, followed by release. 4=unfatigable clonus (more than 10 seconds when maintaining pressure) occurring at precise angle. Mean changes in spasticity grade (Y) from baseline to Week 4 are reported.

Time frame: At Week 4

Population: The ITT population was defined as all enrolled subjects who received at least one injection of study medication in this open label extension study. Too few subjects were treated in Cycle 5 to allow direct comparisons with other cycles and are not reported. Only subjects with data available for analysis at the point of testing are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Spasticity Grade (Y) in Wrist Flexors as PTMGCycle 1-0.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Spasticity Grade (Y) in Wrist Flexors as PTMGCycle 2-0.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Spasticity Grade (Y) in Wrist Flexors as PTMGCycle 3-0.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
Total Dysport®Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Spasticity Grade (Y) in Wrist Flexors as PTMGCycle 4-0.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Secondary

Percentage of Subjects With at Least 1 Grade Reduction in DAS for PTT at Week 4

At baseline the subject and investigator together selected one of the four DAS domains as the PTT. The selected domain was required to have a rating of moderate or severe (≥2) at baseline. The DAS is a 4-point scale, the extent of functional impairment in 4 functional domains (dressing, hygiene, limb position and pain) was rated as follows: 0=no disability, 1=mild disability (noticeable but does not interfere significantly with normal activities), 2=moderate disability (normal activities require increased effort and/or assistance) and 3=severe disability (normal activities limited). The percentage of subjects with at least 1 grade reduction from baseline in DAS for PTT at Week 4 are reported.

Time frame: At Week 4

Population: The ITT population was defined as all enrolled subjects who received at least one injection of study medication in this open label extension study. Too few subjects were treated in Cycle 5 to allow direct comparisons with other cycles and are not reported. Only subjects with data available for analysis at the point of testing are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Total Dysport®Percentage of Subjects With at Least 1 Grade Reduction in DAS for PTT at Week 4Cycle 168.5 Percentage of Subjects
Total Dysport®Percentage of Subjects With at Least 1 Grade Reduction in DAS for PTT at Week 4Cycle 275.1 Percentage of Subjects
Total Dysport®Percentage of Subjects With at Least 1 Grade Reduction in DAS for PTT at Week 4Cycle 373.7 Percentage of Subjects
Total Dysport®Percentage of Subjects With at Least 1 Grade Reduction in DAS for PTT at Week 4Cycle 474.1 Percentage of Subjects
Secondary

Percentage of Subjects With at Least 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in MAS for Elbow Flexors at Week 4

The MAS consists of 6 grades: 0, 1, 1+, 2, 3, or 4 that can be applied to muscles of both the upper and lower limbs. The MAS was applied by the rater by stretching the joint through its full available range over 1 second. The percentage of subjects at least a 1 grade reduction and at least a 2 grades reduction from baseline in mean MAS in the elbow flexors at Week 4 are reported.

Time frame: At Week 4

Population: The ITT population was defined as all enrolled subjects who received at least one injection of study medication in this open label extension study. Too few subjects were treated in Cycle 5 to allow direct comparisons with other cycles and are not reported. Only subjects with data available for analysis at the point of testing are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Total Dysport®Percentage of Subjects With at Least 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in MAS for Elbow Flexors at Week 4At least 1 Grade Reduction -Cycle 184.1 percentage of subjects
Total Dysport®Percentage of Subjects With at Least 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in MAS for Elbow Flexors at Week 4At least 1 Grade Reduction -Cycle 278.3 percentage of subjects
Total Dysport®Percentage of Subjects With at Least 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in MAS for Elbow Flexors at Week 4At least 1 Grade Reduction -Cycle 375.6 percentage of subjects
Total Dysport®Percentage of Subjects With at Least 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in MAS for Elbow Flexors at Week 4At least 1 Grade Reduction -Cycle 473.3 percentage of subjects
Total Dysport®Percentage of Subjects With at Least 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in MAS for Elbow Flexors at Week 4At least 2 Grades Reduction -Cycle 134.8 percentage of subjects
Total Dysport®Percentage of Subjects With at Least 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in MAS for Elbow Flexors at Week 4At least 2 Grades Reduction -Cycle 241.7 percentage of subjects
Total Dysport®Percentage of Subjects With at Least 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in MAS for Elbow Flexors at Week 4At least 2 Grades Reduction -Cycle 333.3 percentage of subjects
Total Dysport®Percentage of Subjects With at Least 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in MAS for Elbow Flexors at Week 4At least 2 Grades Reduction -Cycle 440.0 percentage of subjects
Secondary

Percentage of Subjects With at Least 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in MAS for Extrinsic Finger Flexors at Week 4

The MAS consists of 6 grades: 0, 1, 1+, 2, 3, or 4 that can be applied to muscles of both the upper and lower limbs. The MAS was applied by the rater by stretching the joint through its full available range over 1 second. The percentage of subjects with at least a 1 grade reduction and at least a 2 grades reduction from baseline in mean MAS in the extrinsic finger flexors at Week 4 are reported.

Time frame: At Week 4

Population: The ITT population was defined as all enrolled subjects who received at least one injection of study medication in this open label extension study. Too few subjects were treated in Cycle 5 to allow direct comparisons with other cycles and are not reported. Only subjects with data available for analysis at the point of testing are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Total Dysport®Percentage of Subjects With at Least 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in MAS for Extrinsic Finger Flexors at Week 4At least 1 Grade Reduction -Cycle 178.6 percentage of subjects
Total Dysport®Percentage of Subjects With at Least 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in MAS for Extrinsic Finger Flexors at Week 4At least 1 Grade Reduction -Cycle 281.3 percentage of subjects
Total Dysport®Percentage of Subjects With at Least 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in MAS for Extrinsic Finger Flexors at Week 4At least 1 Grade Reduction -Cycle 380 percentage of subjects
Total Dysport®Percentage of Subjects With at Least 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in MAS for Extrinsic Finger Flexors at Week 4At least 1 Grade Reduction -Cycle 480.4 percentage of subjects
Total Dysport®Percentage of Subjects With at Least 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in MAS for Extrinsic Finger Flexors at Week 4At least 2 Grades Reduction -Cycle 144.1 percentage of subjects
Total Dysport®Percentage of Subjects With at Least 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in MAS for Extrinsic Finger Flexors at Week 4At least 2 Grades Reduction -Cycle 249.3 percentage of subjects
Total Dysport®Percentage of Subjects With at Least 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in MAS for Extrinsic Finger Flexors at Week 4At least 2 Grades Reduction -Cycle 349.5 percentage of subjects
Total Dysport®Percentage of Subjects With at Least 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in MAS for Extrinsic Finger Flexors at Week 4At least 2 Grades Reduction -Cycle 437.5 percentage of subjects
Secondary

Percentage of Subjects With at Least 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in MAS for Overall PTMG

The MAS consists of 6 grades: 0, 1, 1+, 2, 3, or 4 that can be applied to muscles of both the upper and lower limbs. The MAS was applied by the rater by stretching the joint through its full available range over 1 second. The percentage of subjects with at least a 1 grade reduction and at least a 2 grades reduction from baseline in mean MAS in the overall PTMG at Week 4 are reported.

Time frame: At Week 4

Population: The ITT population was defined as all enrolled subjects who received at least one injection of study medication in this open label extension study. Too few subjects were treated in Cycle 5 to allow direct comparisons with other cycles and are not reported. Only subjects with data available for analysis at the point of testing are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Total Dysport®Percentage of Subjects With at Least 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in MAS for Overall PTMGAt least 1 grade reduction - Cycle 177.6 percentage of participants
Total Dysport®Percentage of Subjects With at Least 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in MAS for Overall PTMGAt least 1 grade reduction - Cycle 279.5 percentage of participants
Total Dysport®Percentage of Subjects With at Least 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in MAS for Overall PTMGAt least 1 grade reduction - Cycle 377.1 percentage of participants
Total Dysport®Percentage of Subjects With at Least 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in MAS for Overall PTMGAt least 1 grade reduction - Cycle 475.3 percentage of participants
Total Dysport®Percentage of Subjects With at Least 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in MAS for Overall PTMGAt least 2 grades reduction - Cycle 142.1 percentage of participants
Total Dysport®Percentage of Subjects With at Least 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in MAS for Overall PTMGAt least 2 grades reduction - Cycle 248.0 percentage of participants
Total Dysport®Percentage of Subjects With at Least 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in MAS for Overall PTMGAt least 2 grades reduction - Cycle 344.6 percentage of participants
Total Dysport®Percentage of Subjects With at Least 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in MAS for Overall PTMGAt least 2 grades reduction - Cycle 437.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Subjects With at Least 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in MAS for Wrist Flexors at Week 4

The MAS consists of 6 grades: 0, 1, 1+, 2, 3, or 4 that can be applied to muscles of both the upper and lower limbs. The MAS was applied by the rater by stretching the joint through its full available range over 1 second. The percentage of subjects with at least a 1 grade reduction and at least a 2 grades reduction in mean MAS in the wrist flexors at Week 4 are reported.

Time frame: At Week 4

Population: The ITT population was defined as all enrolled subjects who received at least one injection of study medication in this open label extension study. Too few subjects were treated in Cycle 5 to allow direct comparisons with other cycles and are not reported. Only subjects with data available for analysis at the point of testing are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Total Dysport®Percentage of Subjects With at Least 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in MAS for Wrist Flexors at Week 4At least 1 Grade Reduction -Cycle 162.5 percentage of subjects
Total Dysport®Percentage of Subjects With at Least 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in MAS for Wrist Flexors at Week 4At least 1 Grade Reduction -Cycle 274.3 percentage of subjects
Total Dysport®Percentage of Subjects With at Least 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in MAS for Wrist Flexors at Week 4At least 1 Grade Reduction -Cycle 373.9 percentage of subjects
Total Dysport®Percentage of Subjects With at Least 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in MAS for Wrist Flexors at Week 4At least 1 Grade Reduction -Cycle 450 percentage of subjects
Total Dysport®Percentage of Subjects With at Least 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in MAS for Wrist Flexors at Week 4At least 2 Grades Reduction -Cycle 147.5 percentage of subjects
Total Dysport®Percentage of Subjects With at Least 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in MAS for Wrist Flexors at Week 4At least 2 Grades Reduction -Cycle 254.3 percentage of subjects
Total Dysport®Percentage of Subjects With at Least 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in MAS for Wrist Flexors at Week 4At least 2 Grades Reduction -Cycle 347.8 percentage of subjects
Total Dysport®Percentage of Subjects With at Least 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in MAS for Wrist Flexors at Week 4At least 2 Grades Reduction -Cycle 430.0 percentage of subjects
Secondary

Percentage of Subjects With at Least One Grade Reduction in DAS for Individual Domains at Week 4

The DAS is a 4-point scale. The extent of functional impairment in 4 functional domains (dressing, hygiene, limb position and pain) was rated as follows: 0=no disability, 1=mild disability (noticeable but does not interfere significantly with normal activities), 2=moderate disability (normal activities require increased effort and/or assistance) and 3=severe disability (normal activities limited). The percentage of subjects with at least one grade reduction in DAS for each of the individual domains at Week 4 is reported.

Time frame: At Week 4

Population: The ITT population was defined as all enrolled subjects who received at least one injection of study medication in this open label extension study. Too few subjects were treated in Cycle 5 to allow direct comparisons with other cycles and are not reported. Only subjects with data available for analysis at the point of testing are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Total Dysport®Percentage of Subjects With at Least One Grade Reduction in DAS for Individual Domains at Week 4Hygiene - Cycle 140.9 percentage of subjects
Total Dysport®Percentage of Subjects With at Least One Grade Reduction in DAS for Individual Domains at Week 4Hygiene - Cycle 245.4 percentage of subjects
Total Dysport®Percentage of Subjects With at Least One Grade Reduction in DAS for Individual Domains at Week 4Hygiene - Cycle 344.6 percentage of subjects
Total Dysport®Percentage of Subjects With at Least One Grade Reduction in DAS for Individual Domains at Week 4Hygiene - Cycle 446.9 percentage of subjects
Total Dysport®Percentage of Subjects With at Least One Grade Reduction in DAS for Individual Domains at Week 4Dressing - Cycle 140.9 percentage of subjects
Total Dysport®Percentage of Subjects With at Least One Grade Reduction in DAS for Individual Domains at Week 4Dressing - Cycle 247.2 percentage of subjects
Total Dysport®Percentage of Subjects With at Least One Grade Reduction in DAS for Individual Domains at Week 4Dressing - Cycle 346.9 percentage of subjects
Total Dysport®Percentage of Subjects With at Least One Grade Reduction in DAS for Individual Domains at Week 4Dressing - Cycle 453.1 percentage of subjects
Total Dysport®Percentage of Subjects With at Least One Grade Reduction in DAS for Individual Domains at Week 4Limb Position - Cycle 155.5 percentage of subjects
Total Dysport®Percentage of Subjects With at Least One Grade Reduction in DAS for Individual Domains at Week 4Limb Position - Cycle 259.4 percentage of subjects
Total Dysport®Percentage of Subjects With at Least One Grade Reduction in DAS for Individual Domains at Week 4Limb Position - Cycle 360.6 percentage of subjects
Total Dysport®Percentage of Subjects With at Least One Grade Reduction in DAS for Individual Domains at Week 4Limb Position - Cycle 453.1 percentage of subjects
Total Dysport®Percentage of Subjects With at Least One Grade Reduction in DAS for Individual Domains at Week 4Pain - Cycle 236.7 percentage of subjects
Total Dysport®Percentage of Subjects With at Least One Grade Reduction in DAS for Individual Domains at Week 4Pain - Cycle 342.3 percentage of subjects
Total Dysport®Percentage of Subjects With at Least One Grade Reduction in DAS for Individual Domains at Week 4Pain - Cycle 448.1 percentage of subjects
Total Dysport®Percentage of Subjects With at Least One Grade Reduction in DAS for Individual Domains at Week 4Pain - Cycle 133.1 percentage of subjects
Secondary

Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) of Treatment Response at Week 4

The PGA is a 9-point rating scale: -4=markedly worse, -3=much worse, -2=worse, -1=slightly worse, 0=no change, +1=slightly improved, +2=improved, +3=much improved, +4=markedly improved. An assessment of overall treatment response was conducted by the investigator and the mean PGA scores during long-term open label treatment with Dysport were reported.

Time frame: At Week 4

Population: The ITT population was defined as all enrolled subjects who received at least one injection of study medication in this open label extension study. Too few subjects were treated in Cycle 5 to allow direct comparisons with other cycles and are not reported. Only subjects with data available for analysis at the point of testing are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Total Dysport®Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) of Treatment Response at Week 4Cycle 11.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Total Dysport®Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) of Treatment Response at Week 4Cycle 21.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Total Dysport®Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) of Treatment Response at Week 4Cycle 31.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Total Dysport®Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) of Treatment Response at Week 4Cycle 42 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 25, 2026