Skip to content

Magna Mitral - 23mm

Clinical Evaluation of the Size 23mm Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT Magna Mitral Bioprosthesis, Model 7000TFX

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01312779
Enrollment
39
Registered
2011-03-11
Start date
2011-03-31
Completion date
2018-11-30
Last updated
2020-03-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Mitral Heart Valve Disease

Keywords

Mitral Valve Replacement, 23mm CEP, Magna

Brief summary

The purpose of this clinical study is to obtain human clinical data that demonstrates that the size 23mm Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT Magna mitral pericardial valve, model 7000TFX, is a safe and effective replacement heart valve.

Detailed description

This is a prospective, non-randomized, multi-site, descriptive study. A minimum of 15 and up to 20 subjects will be implanted at a minimum of 2 and up to 8 participating investigational sites within the US and internationally.

Interventions

DEVICEImplantation of CEP Magna Mitral Model 7000TFX

Heart valve surgery: CEP Magna Mitral Model 7000 TFX

Sponsors

Edwards Lifesciences
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
13 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Patient has mitral valve disease requiring surgical replacement 2. Patient has provided written informed consent prior to mitral valve surgery 3. Patient is expected to survive surgery and be discharged 4. Patient is willing to comply with specified follow-up evaluations 5. Patient is 13 years of age or older

Exclusion criteria

1. Patient has life expectancy \< 12 months due to non-cardiac co-morbid conditions; 2. Patient has/had active endocarditis within the last 3 months 3. Patient requires replacement of a native or previously implanted prosthetic, tricuspid, pulmonic or aortic valve; 4. Patient was previously enrolled and implanted in the study 5. Patient has/had prior aortic, tricuspid and/ or pulmonary valve surgery, which included implantation of a bioprosthetic valve or mechanical valve that will remain in situ 6. Patient has a body surface area (BSA) \> 1.9m2 7. Female patients who are pregnant, planning to become pregnant, or lactating 8. Patient has a documented history of substance ( drug or alcohol) abuse 9. Patient is currently a prison inmate 10. Patient is currently participating in an investigational drug or another device study 11. Patient is undergoing renal dialysis for chronic renal failure or has hyperparathyroidism 12. Patient has active myocarditis 13. Patient has had an acute preoperative neurological deficit, myocardial infarction, or cardiac event and has not returned to baseline or stabilized \> 30 days prior to the planned v alve implant surgery 14. Patient has an abnormality such as an aortic aneurysm (e.g. due to cystic medial necrosis or Marfan's syndrome), aortic dissection, or ventricular aneurysm that might place

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent of Early Adverse Events DividedEvents occuring within 30 days of procedureNumber of early adverse events occurring within 30 days of procedure divided by the number of enrolled subjects times 100.
Percent of Late Adverse EventsEvents occurring >= 31 days and up through 5 years post-implantNumber of late events divided by the total number of late patient years times 100. Late patient years are calculated from 31 days post-implant to the date of the last contact (follow up or adverse event).
Percentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 Days>30 Days, 1 Year, 2 Years, 3 Years, 4 Years, and 5 Years post-implantSubject's freedom from Serious Adverse Events at \> 30 days post-implant. Time to events were estimated by Kaplan-Meier method.
Subject's Average Effective Orifice Area (EOA) MeasurementPre-procedure and 1 Year post-ImplantEffective orifice area represents the cross-sectional area of the blood flow downstream of the mitral valve. Effective orifice area is evaluated by echocardiography over time.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Subject's Average Cardiac OutputPre-procedure and 1 Year post-implantThe amount of blood the heart pumps through the circulatory system in a minute.
Subject's Average Cardiac IndexPre-procedure and 1 Year post-implantCardiac index is an assessment that divides the cardiac output from the left ventricle in one minute by the person's body surface area (BSA), thus relating heart performance to the size of the individual.
Subject's Average Left Ventricular Mass RegressionPre-procedure and 1 Year post-implantPatients can experience an enlargement of the left ventricle (chamber) of their heart because it works harder with a defective heart valve. Left ventricular mass regression evaluates if the patient experiences a decrease in the size of the left ventricle (chamber) after the repair or replacement of their heart valve.
Subject's Severity of Central Mitral Regurgitation at 1 Year Post-implant.1 Year post-implantMitral valvular regurgitation occurs when the mitral valve in the heart does not close tightly allowing some of the blood that was pumped out of the heart to leak back into it. Mitral valvular regurgitation is evaluated by echocardiography over time. It is assessed on a scale from 0 to 4, where 0 represents no regurgitation and 4 represents severe regurgitation.
Subject's Average Red Blood Cells CountBaseline, 6 Month, 1 Year, 2 Years, 3 Years, 4 Years, and 5 Years post-implantLaboratory Analysis of Red Blood Cell (RBC) Count on blood drawn from subjects; RBC carry oxygen.
Subject's Average White Blood Cell CountBaseline, 6 Month, 1 Year, 2 Years, 3 Years, 4 Years, and 5 Years post-implantLaboratory analysis of White Blood Cell (WBC) Count on blood drawn from subject; WBC fight infection.
Subject's Average Mean Gradient MeasurementPre-procedure and 1 Year post-implantMean gradient is the average flow of blood through the mitral valve measured in millimeters of mercury. Gradients are evaluated by echocardiography over time. Mean gradient values depend on the size and type of valve.
Subject's Average Plasma Free HemoglobinBaseline, 6 Month, 1 Year, 2 Years, 3 Years, 4 Years, and 5 Years post-implantLaboratory Analysis of Plasma Free Hemoglobin on blood drawn from subjects. This blood test measures the level of free hemoglobin in the plasma (liquid portion of the blood).
Subject's Average Hemoglobin CountBaseline, 6 Month, 1 Year, 2 Years, 3 Years, 4 Years, and 5 Years post-implantLaboratory Analysis of Hemoglobin Count on blood drawn from subjects. Hemoglobin is an oxygen-carrying protein in red blood cells.
Subject's Average Platelet CountBaseline, 6 Month, 1 Year, 2 Years, 3 Years, 4 Years, and 5 Years post-implantLaboratory Analysis of Platelet Count on blood drawn from subjects; platelets help with blood clotting.
Number and Percentage of Subjects in NYHA Functional Class I or II at 1 Year Post-Implant.Baseline and 1 Year post-implantThe New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classification system relates symptoms to everyday activities and the patient's quality of life. Class I. No limitation of physical activity. Ordinary physical activity does not cause undue fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea (shortness of breath). Class II. Slight limitation of physical activity. Comfortable at rest. Ordinary physical activity results in fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea (shortness of breath).
Subject's New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class Compared to Baseline6 Months, 1 Year, 2 Years, 3 Years, 4 Years, and 5 Years post-implantThe New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classification system relates symptoms to everyday activities and the patient's quality of life. Class I. No limitation of physical activity. Ordinary physical activity does not cause undue fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea (shortness of breath). Class II. Slight limitation of physical activity. Comfortable at rest. Ordinary physical activity results in fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea (shortness of breath). Class III. Marked limitation of physical activity. Comfortable at rest. Less than ordinary activity causes fatigue, palpitation, or dyspnea. Class IV. Unable to carry on any physical activity without discomfort. Symptoms of heart failure at rest. If any physical activity is undertaken, discomfort increases.
Subject's Average Score on the EQ-5D- Quality of Life Questionnaire Over Time6 Months and 1 Year post-implantThe EQ-5D is a standardized questionnaire that asks subjects to rate themselves (no problems, some problems, extreme problems) on mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. The scale is indexed and ranges from a minimum of 0.275 and a maximum of 1.000. A lower number indicates the participants experiences more problems and a higher number indicates the participants experiences fewer problems.
Subject's Average Hematocrit PercentageBaseline, 6 Month, 1 Year, 2 Years, 3 Years, 4 Years, and 5 Years post-implantLaboratory Analysis of Hematocrit Percentage on blood drawn from subjects. Hematocrit is the proportion of red blood cells to the plasma (liquid portion of the blood).
Subject's Average Peak Gradient MeasurementPre-procedure and 1 Year post-implantPeak gradient is the maximum value measured of flow of blood through the mitral valve as measured in millimeters of mercury. Gradients are evaluated by echocardiography over time.
Subject's Average Effective Orifice Area Index (EOAI) MeasurementPre-procedure and 1 Year post-implantEffective orifice area index represents the minimal cross-sectional area of the blood flow downstream of the mitral valve divided by the person's body surface area. Effective orifice area index is evaluated by echocardiography over time.
Subject's Average Performance Index MeasurementPre-procedure and 1 Year post-ImplantPerformance index is defined as the subject's effective orifice area (the cross sectional area of the blood flow downstream of the mitral valve) divided by the subject's native orifice area. Effective orifice area is evaluated by echocardiography over time.

Countries

Poland, United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Magna Mitral 23
Clinical Evaluation of the size 23 mm Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT Magna Mitral Bioprosthesis, Model 7000TFX
12
Total12

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyDeath3
Overall StudyNot Implanted with Device27
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject2

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicMagna Mitral 23
Age, Continuous67.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected— Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
12 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
3 / 12
other
Total, other adverse events
11 / 12
serious
Total, serious adverse events
12 / 12

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 Days

Subject's freedom from Serious Adverse Events at \> 30 days post-implant. Time to events were estimated by Kaplan-Meier method.

Time frame: >30 Days, 1 Year, 2 Years, 3 Years, 4 Years, and 5 Years post-implant

Population: The outcome is reported for subjects who received the Magna Mitral, Model 7000TFX device where data is available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Magna Mitral 23Percentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 DaysDeath100.00 percentage of subjects
Magna Mitral 23Percentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 DaysBleeding Event100.00 percentage of subjects
Magna Mitral 23Percentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 DaysMajor Perivalvular Leak100.00 percentage of subjects
Magna Mitral 23Percentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 DaysReoperation100.00 percentage of subjects
Magna Mitral 23Percentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 DaysMajor Bleeding Event100.00 percentage of subjects
Magna Mitral 23Percentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 DaysNon-structural Valve Dysfunction100.00 percentage of subjects
Magna Mitral 23Percentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 DaysStructural Valve Deterioration100.00 percentage of subjects
Magna Mitral 23Percentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 DaysExplant100.00 percentage of subjects
Magna Mitral 23Percentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 DaysThromboembolism100.00 percentage of subjects
Magna Mitral 23Percentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 DaysPerivalvular Leak100.00 percentage of subjects
Magna Mitral 23Percentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 DaysValve Thrombosis100.00 percentage of subjects
Magna Mitral 23Percentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 DaysValve-related Death100.00 percentage of subjects
Magna Mitral 23Percentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 DaysEndocarditis100.00 percentage of subjects
Magna Mitral 23Percentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 DaysHemolysis100.00 percentage of subjects
Magna Mitral 23 - 1 Year Post-implantPercentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 DaysMajor Bleeding Event90.00 percentage of subjects
Magna Mitral 23 - 1 Year Post-implantPercentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 DaysPerivalvular Leak100.00 percentage of subjects
Magna Mitral 23 - 1 Year Post-implantPercentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 DaysEndocarditis100.00 percentage of subjects
Magna Mitral 23 - 1 Year Post-implantPercentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 DaysMajor Perivalvular Leak100.00 percentage of subjects
Magna Mitral 23 - 1 Year Post-implantPercentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 DaysValve Thrombosis100.00 percentage of subjects
Magna Mitral 23 - 1 Year Post-implantPercentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 DaysValve-related Death100.0 percentage of subjects
Magna Mitral 23 - 1 Year Post-implantPercentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 DaysStructural Valve Deterioration100.00 percentage of subjects
Magna Mitral 23 - 1 Year Post-implantPercentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 DaysReoperation100.00 percentage of subjects
Magna Mitral 23 - 1 Year Post-implantPercentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 DaysNon-structural Valve Dysfunction100.00 percentage of subjects
Magna Mitral 23 - 1 Year Post-implantPercentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 DaysExplant100.00 percentage of subjects
Magna Mitral 23 - 1 Year Post-implantPercentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 DaysBleeding Event90.00 percentage of subjects
Magna Mitral 23 - 1 Year Post-implantPercentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 DaysHemolysis100.00 percentage of subjects
Magna Mitral 23 - 1 Year Post-implantPercentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 DaysThromboembolism100.00 percentage of subjects
Magna Mitral 23 - 1 Year Post-implantPercentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 DaysDeath90.91 percentage of subjects
Magna Mitral 23 - 2 Years Post-implantPercentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 DaysHemolysis100.00 percentage of subjects
Magna Mitral 23 - 2 Years Post-implantPercentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 DaysStructural Valve Deterioration100.00 percentage of subjects
Magna Mitral 23 - 2 Years Post-implantPercentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 DaysThromboembolism88.89 percentage of subjects
Magna Mitral 23 - 2 Years Post-implantPercentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 DaysBleeding Event90.00 percentage of subjects
Magna Mitral 23 - 2 Years Post-implantPercentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 DaysMajor Perivalvular Leak100.00 percentage of subjects
Magna Mitral 23 - 2 Years Post-implantPercentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 DaysDeath90.91 percentage of subjects
Magna Mitral 23 - 2 Years Post-implantPercentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 DaysValve-related Death100.0 percentage of subjects
Magna Mitral 23 - 2 Years Post-implantPercentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 DaysEndocarditis100.00 percentage of subjects
Magna Mitral 23 - 2 Years Post-implantPercentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 DaysPerivalvular Leak100.00 percentage of subjects
Magna Mitral 23 - 2 Years Post-implantPercentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 DaysNon-structural Valve Dysfunction100.00 percentage of subjects
Magna Mitral 23 - 2 Years Post-implantPercentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 DaysMajor Bleeding Event90.00 percentage of subjects
Magna Mitral 23 - 2 Years Post-implantPercentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 DaysExplant100.00 percentage of subjects
Magna Mitral 23 - 2 Years Post-implantPercentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 DaysValve Thrombosis100.00 percentage of subjects
Magna Mitral 23 - 2 Years Post-implantPercentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 DaysReoperation100.00 percentage of subjects
Magna Mitral 23 - 3 Years Post-implantPercentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 DaysBleeding Event90.00 percentage of subjects
Magna Mitral 23 - 3 Years Post-implantPercentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 DaysDeath90.91 percentage of subjects
Magna Mitral 23 - 3 Years Post-implantPercentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 DaysValve-related Death100.0 percentage of subjects
Magna Mitral 23 - 3 Years Post-implantPercentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 DaysReoperation100.00 percentage of subjects
Magna Mitral 23 - 3 Years Post-implantPercentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 DaysExplant100.00 percentage of subjects
Magna Mitral 23 - 3 Years Post-implantPercentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 DaysMajor Perivalvular Leak100.00 percentage of subjects
Magna Mitral 23 - 3 Years Post-implantPercentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 DaysMajor Bleeding Event90.00 percentage of subjects
Magna Mitral 23 - 3 Years Post-implantPercentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 DaysThromboembolism88.89 percentage of subjects
Magna Mitral 23 - 3 Years Post-implantPercentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 DaysEndocarditis100.00 percentage of subjects
Magna Mitral 23 - 3 Years Post-implantPercentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 DaysPerivalvular Leak100.00 percentage of subjects
Magna Mitral 23 - 3 Years Post-implantPercentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 DaysHemolysis100.00 percentage of subjects
Magna Mitral 23 - 3 Years Post-implantPercentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 DaysNon-structural Valve Dysfunction100.00 percentage of subjects
Magna Mitral 23 - 3 Years Post-implantPercentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 DaysStructural Valve Deterioration100.00 percentage of subjects
Magna Mitral 23 - 3 Years Post-implantPercentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 DaysValve Thrombosis100.00 percentage of subjects
Magna Mitral 23 - 4 Years Post-implantPercentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 DaysDeath80.81 percentage of subjects
Magna Mitral 23 - 4 Years Post-implantPercentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 DaysPerivalvular Leak100.00 percentage of subjects
Magna Mitral 23 - 4 Years Post-implantPercentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 DaysMajor Bleeding Event90.00 percentage of subjects
Magna Mitral 23 - 4 Years Post-implantPercentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 DaysMajor Perivalvular Leak100.00 percentage of subjects
Magna Mitral 23 - 4 Years Post-implantPercentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 DaysBleeding Event90.00 percentage of subjects
Magna Mitral 23 - 4 Years Post-implantPercentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 DaysHemolysis100.00 percentage of subjects
Magna Mitral 23 - 4 Years Post-implantPercentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 DaysExplant100.00 percentage of subjects
Magna Mitral 23 - 4 Years Post-implantPercentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 DaysReoperation100.00 percentage of subjects
Magna Mitral 23 - 4 Years Post-implantPercentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 DaysNon-structural Valve Dysfunction100.00 percentage of subjects
Magna Mitral 23 - 4 Years Post-implantPercentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 DaysValve-related Death88.89 percentage of subjects
Magna Mitral 23 - 4 Years Post-implantPercentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 DaysValve Thrombosis100.00 percentage of subjects
Magna Mitral 23 - 4 Years Post-implantPercentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 DaysStructural Valve Deterioration100.00 percentage of subjects
Magna Mitral 23 - 4 Years Post-implantPercentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 DaysEndocarditis88.89 percentage of subjects
Magna Mitral 23 - 4 Years Post-implantPercentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 DaysThromboembolism88.89 percentage of subjects
Magna Mitral 23 - 5 Years Post-implantPercentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 DaysStructural Valve Deterioration87.50 percentage of subjects
Magna Mitral 23 - 5 Years Post-implantPercentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 DaysValve Thrombosis100.00 percentage of subjects
Magna Mitral 23 - 5 Years Post-implantPercentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 DaysPerivalvular Leak100.00 percentage of subjects
Magna Mitral 23 - 5 Years Post-implantPercentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 DaysDeath80.81 percentage of subjects
Magna Mitral 23 - 5 Years Post-implantPercentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 DaysValve-related Death88.89 percentage of subjects
Magna Mitral 23 - 5 Years Post-implantPercentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 DaysMajor Perivalvular Leak100.00 percentage of subjects
Magna Mitral 23 - 5 Years Post-implantPercentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 DaysBleeding Event90.00 percentage of subjects
Magna Mitral 23 - 5 Years Post-implantPercentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 DaysMajor Bleeding Event90.00 percentage of subjects
Magna Mitral 23 - 5 Years Post-implantPercentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 DaysExplant87.50 percentage of subjects
Magna Mitral 23 - 5 Years Post-implantPercentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 DaysNon-structural Valve Dysfunction100.00 percentage of subjects
Magna Mitral 23 - 5 Years Post-implantPercentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 DaysEndocarditis88.89 percentage of subjects
Magna Mitral 23 - 5 Years Post-implantPercentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 DaysHemolysis100.00 percentage of subjects
Magna Mitral 23 - 5 Years Post-implantPercentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 DaysThromboembolism88.89 percentage of subjects
Magna Mitral 23 - 5 Years Post-implantPercentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 DaysReoperation87.50 percentage of subjects
Primary

Percent of Early Adverse Events Divided

Number of early adverse events occurring within 30 days of procedure divided by the number of enrolled subjects times 100.

Time frame: Events occuring within 30 days of procedure

Population: The outcome is reported for subjects who received the Magna Mitral, Model 7000TFX device where data is available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Magna Mitral 23Percent of Early Adverse Events DividedMajor Clinically Significant PVL0.0 percentage of subjects
Magna Mitral 23Percent of Early Adverse Events DividedHemolysis0.0 percentage of subjects
Magna Mitral 23Percent of Early Adverse Events DividedEndocarditis0.0 percentage of subjects
Magna Mitral 23Percent of Early Adverse Events DividedStructural Valve Deterioration0.0 percentage of subjects
Magna Mitral 23Percent of Early Adverse Events DividedReoperation0.0 percentage of subjects
Magna Mitral 23Percent of Early Adverse Events DividedValve Thrombosis0.0 percentage of subjects
Magna Mitral 23Percent of Early Adverse Events DividedHemorrhage0.0 percentage of subjects
Magna Mitral 23Percent of Early Adverse Events DividedMajor Hemorrhage0.0 percentage of subjects
Magna Mitral 23Percent of Early Adverse Events DividedDeath8.3 percentage of subjects
Magna Mitral 23Percent of Early Adverse Events DividedValve-Related Death0.0 percentage of subjects
Magna Mitral 23Percent of Early Adverse Events DividedThromboembolism0.0 percentage of subjects
Magna Mitral 23Percent of Early Adverse Events DividedNon-Structural Valve Dysfunction (study valve)8.3 percentage of subjects
Magna Mitral 23Percent of Early Adverse Events DividedAll Clinically Significant PVL8.3 percentage of subjects
Magna Mitral 23Percent of Early Adverse Events DividedExplant0.0 percentage of subjects
Primary

Percent of Late Adverse Events

Number of late events divided by the total number of late patient years times 100. Late patient years are calculated from 31 days post-implant to the date of the last contact (follow up or adverse event).

Time frame: Events occurring >= 31 days and up through 5 years post-implant

Population: The outcome is reported for subjects who received the Magna Mitral, Model 7000TFX device where data is available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Magna Mitral 23Percent of Late Adverse EventsExplant6.7 percentage of events/late patient years
Magna Mitral 23Percent of Late Adverse EventsDeath4.5 percentage of events/late patient years
Magna Mitral 23Percent of Late Adverse EventsValve-Related Death2.2 percentage of events/late patient years
Magna Mitral 23Percent of Late Adverse EventsThromboembolism2.2 percentage of events/late patient years
Magna Mitral 23Percent of Late Adverse EventsValve Thrombosis0.0 percentage of events/late patient years
Magna Mitral 23Percent of Late Adverse EventsHemorrhage2.2 percentage of events/late patient years
Magna Mitral 23Percent of Late Adverse EventsMajor Hemorrhage2.2 percentage of events/late patient years
Magna Mitral 23Percent of Late Adverse EventsNon-Structural Valve Dysfunction (study valve)0.0 percentage of events/late patient years
Magna Mitral 23Percent of Late Adverse EventsAll Clinically Significant PVL0.0 percentage of events/late patient years
Magna Mitral 23Percent of Late Adverse EventsMajor Clinically Significant PVL0.0 percentage of events/late patient years
Magna Mitral 23Percent of Late Adverse EventsHemolysis0.0 percentage of events/late patient years
Magna Mitral 23Percent of Late Adverse EventsEndocarditis2.2 percentage of events/late patient years
Magna Mitral 23Percent of Late Adverse EventsStructural Valve Deterioration6.7 percentage of events/late patient years
Magna Mitral 23Percent of Late Adverse EventsReoperation6.7 percentage of events/late patient years
Primary

Subject's Average Effective Orifice Area (EOA) Measurement

Effective orifice area represents the cross-sectional area of the blood flow downstream of the mitral valve. Effective orifice area is evaluated by echocardiography over time.

Time frame: Pre-procedure and 1 Year post-Implant

Population: The outcome is reported for subjects who received the Magna Mitral, Model 7000TFX device where data is available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Magna Mitral 23Subject's Average Effective Orifice Area (EOA) MeasurementPre-Procedure0.8 Centimeters SquaredStandard Deviation 0.2
Magna Mitral 23Subject's Average Effective Orifice Area (EOA) Measurement1 Year1.2 Centimeters SquaredStandard Deviation 0.2
Other Pre-specified

Number and Percentage of Subjects in NYHA Functional Class I or II at 1 Year Post-Implant.

The New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classification system relates symptoms to everyday activities and the patient's quality of life. Class I. No limitation of physical activity. Ordinary physical activity does not cause undue fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea (shortness of breath). Class II. Slight limitation of physical activity. Comfortable at rest. Ordinary physical activity results in fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea (shortness of breath).

Time frame: Baseline and 1 Year post-implant

Population: The outcome is reported for subjects who received the Magna Mitral, Model 7000TFX device where data is available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Magna Mitral 23Number and Percentage of Subjects in NYHA Functional Class I or II at 1 Year Post-Implant.Class II5 Participants
Magna Mitral 23Number and Percentage of Subjects in NYHA Functional Class I or II at 1 Year Post-Implant.Class I1 Participants
Magna Mitral 23 - 1 Year Post-implantNumber and Percentage of Subjects in NYHA Functional Class I or II at 1 Year Post-Implant.Class I7 Participants
Magna Mitral 23 - 1 Year Post-implantNumber and Percentage of Subjects in NYHA Functional Class I or II at 1 Year Post-Implant.Class II1 Participants
Other Pre-specified

Subject's Average Cardiac Index

Cardiac index is an assessment that divides the cardiac output from the left ventricle in one minute by the person's body surface area (BSA), thus relating heart performance to the size of the individual.

Time frame: Pre-procedure and 1 Year post-implant

Population: The outcome is reported for subjects who received the Magna Mitral, Model 7000TFX device where data is available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Magna Mitral 23Subject's Average Cardiac IndexPre-Procedure2.4 L/min/m2Standard Deviation 0.4
Magna Mitral 23Subject's Average Cardiac Index1 Year2.9 L/min/m2Standard Deviation 0.5
Other Pre-specified

Subject's Average Cardiac Output

The amount of blood the heart pumps through the circulatory system in a minute.

Time frame: Pre-procedure and 1 Year post-implant

Population: The outcome is reported for subjects who received the Magna Mitral, Model 7000TFX device where data is available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Magna Mitral 23Subject's Average Cardiac OutputPre-Procedure4.0 Liters/minuteStandard Deviation 0.8
Magna Mitral 23Subject's Average Cardiac Output1 Year4.8 Liters/minuteStandard Deviation 0.7
Other Pre-specified

Subject's Average Effective Orifice Area Index (EOAI) Measurement

Effective orifice area index represents the minimal cross-sectional area of the blood flow downstream of the mitral valve divided by the person's body surface area. Effective orifice area index is evaluated by echocardiography over time.

Time frame: Pre-procedure and 1 Year post-implant

Population: The outcome is reported for subjects who received the Magna Mitral, Model 7000TFX device where data is available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Magna Mitral 23Subject's Average Effective Orifice Area Index (EOAI) MeasurementPre-Procedure0.5 cm^2/m^2Standard Deviation 0.1
Magna Mitral 23Subject's Average Effective Orifice Area Index (EOAI) Measurement1 Year0.7 cm^2/m^2Standard Deviation 0.1
Other Pre-specified

Subject's Average Hematocrit Percentage

Laboratory Analysis of Hematocrit Percentage on blood drawn from subjects. Hematocrit is the proportion of red blood cells to the plasma (liquid portion of the blood).

Time frame: Baseline, 6 Month, 1 Year, 2 Years, 3 Years, 4 Years, and 5 Years post-implant

Population: The outcome is reported for subjects who received the Magna Mitral, Model 7000TFX device where data is available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Magna Mitral 23Subject's Average Hematocrit Percentage1 Year41.2 percentage of red blood cellsStandard Deviation 3.4
Magna Mitral 23Subject's Average Hematocrit Percentage2 Year39.7 percentage of red blood cellsStandard Deviation 4.3
Magna Mitral 23Subject's Average Hematocrit Percentage3 Year36.3 percentage of red blood cellsStandard Deviation 7
Magna Mitral 23Subject's Average Hematocrit Percentage4 Year40.1 percentage of red blood cellsStandard Deviation 4
Magna Mitral 23Subject's Average Hematocrit Percentage5 Year37.4 percentage of red blood cellsStandard Deviation 3.7
Magna Mitral 23Subject's Average Hematocrit PercentageBaseline38.3 percentage of red blood cellsStandard Deviation 6
Magna Mitral 23Subject's Average Hematocrit Percentage6 Month40.6 percentage of red blood cellsStandard Deviation 6.6
Other Pre-specified

Subject's Average Hemoglobin Count

Laboratory Analysis of Hemoglobin Count on blood drawn from subjects. Hemoglobin is an oxygen-carrying protein in red blood cells.

Time frame: Baseline, 6 Month, 1 Year, 2 Years, 3 Years, 4 Years, and 5 Years post-implant

Population: The outcome is reported for subjects who received the Magna Mitral, Model 7000TFX device where data is available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Magna Mitral 23Subject's Average Hemoglobin Count4 Year13.4 g/dlStandard Deviation 1.7
Magna Mitral 23Subject's Average Hemoglobin Count2 Year13.0 g/dlStandard Deviation 1.7
Magna Mitral 23Subject's Average Hemoglobin CountBaseline12.5 g/dlStandard Deviation 2.1
Magna Mitral 23Subject's Average Hemoglobin Count6 Month13.3 g/dlStandard Deviation 2.3
Magna Mitral 23Subject's Average Hemoglobin Count1 Year13.5 g/dlStandard Deviation 1.5
Magna Mitral 23Subject's Average Hemoglobin Count3 Year12.1 g/dlStandard Deviation 2.6
Magna Mitral 23Subject's Average Hemoglobin Count5 Year12.1 g/dlStandard Deviation 1.5
Other Pre-specified

Subject's Average Left Ventricular Mass Regression

Patients can experience an enlargement of the left ventricle (chamber) of their heart because it works harder with a defective heart valve. Left ventricular mass regression evaluates if the patient experiences a decrease in the size of the left ventricle (chamber) after the repair or replacement of their heart valve.

Time frame: Pre-procedure and 1 Year post-implant

Population: The outcome is reported for subjects who received the Magna Mitral, Model 7000TFX device where data is available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Magna Mitral 23Subject's Average Left Ventricular Mass Regression1 Year130.7 gramsStandard Deviation 35.1
Magna Mitral 23Subject's Average Left Ventricular Mass RegressionPre-Procedure161.0 gramsStandard Deviation 42.4
Other Pre-specified

Subject's Average Mean Gradient Measurement

Mean gradient is the average flow of blood through the mitral valve measured in millimeters of mercury. Gradients are evaluated by echocardiography over time. Mean gradient values depend on the size and type of valve.

Time frame: Pre-procedure and 1 Year post-implant

Population: The outcome is reported for subjects who received the Magna Mitral, Model 7000TFX device where data is available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Magna Mitral 23Subject's Average Mean Gradient MeasurementPre-Procedure9.8 mmHgStandard Deviation 5.3
Magna Mitral 23Subject's Average Mean Gradient Measurement1 Year7.5 mmHgStandard Deviation 1.7
Other Pre-specified

Subject's Average Peak Gradient Measurement

Peak gradient is the maximum value measured of flow of blood through the mitral valve as measured in millimeters of mercury. Gradients are evaluated by echocardiography over time.

Time frame: Pre-procedure and 1 Year post-implant

Population: The outcome is reported for subjects who received the Magna Mitral, Model 7000TFX device where data is available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Magna Mitral 23Subject's Average Peak Gradient MeasurementPre-Procedure19.1 mmHgStandard Deviation 7.5
Magna Mitral 23Subject's Average Peak Gradient Measurement1 Year16.8 mmHgStandard Deviation 5.1
Other Pre-specified

Subject's Average Performance Index Measurement

Performance index is defined as the subject's effective orifice area (the cross sectional area of the blood flow downstream of the mitral valve) divided by the subject's native orifice area. Effective orifice area is evaluated by echocardiography over time.

Time frame: Pre-procedure and 1 Year post-Implant

Population: The outcome is reported for subjects who received the Magna Mitral, Model 7000TFX device where data is available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Magna Mitral 23Subject's Average Performance Index MeasurementPre-Procedure0.7 cm^2/cm^2Standard Deviation 0.2
Magna Mitral 23Subject's Average Performance Index Measurement1 Year1.0 cm^2/cm^2Standard Deviation 0.1
Other Pre-specified

Subject's Average Plasma Free Hemoglobin

Laboratory Analysis of Plasma Free Hemoglobin on blood drawn from subjects. This blood test measures the level of free hemoglobin in the plasma (liquid portion of the blood).

Time frame: Baseline, 6 Month, 1 Year, 2 Years, 3 Years, 4 Years, and 5 Years post-implant

Population: The outcome is reported for subjects who received the Magna Mitral, Model 7000TFX device where data is available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Magna Mitral 23Subject's Average Plasma Free Hemoglobin2 Year14.8 mg/dlStandard Deviation 9.2
Magna Mitral 23Subject's Average Plasma Free HemoglobinBaseline12.9 mg/dlStandard Deviation 13.9
Magna Mitral 23Subject's Average Plasma Free Hemoglobin6 Month23.1 mg/dlStandard Deviation 19.5
Magna Mitral 23Subject's Average Plasma Free Hemoglobin1 Year11.2 mg/dlStandard Deviation 11.8
Magna Mitral 23Subject's Average Plasma Free Hemoglobin3 Year5.1 mg/dlStandard Deviation 3.4
Magna Mitral 23Subject's Average Plasma Free Hemoglobin4 Year22.3 mg/dlStandard Deviation 15.6
Magna Mitral 23Subject's Average Plasma Free Hemoglobin5 Year9.9 mg/dlStandard Deviation 9.4
Other Pre-specified

Subject's Average Platelet Count

Laboratory Analysis of Platelet Count on blood drawn from subjects; platelets help with blood clotting.

Time frame: Baseline, 6 Month, 1 Year, 2 Years, 3 Years, 4 Years, and 5 Years post-implant

Population: The outcome is reported for subjects who received the Magna Mitral, Model 7000TFX device where data is available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Magna Mitral 23Subject's Average Platelet CountBaseline244.8 10^3 platelets per microliterStandard Deviation 95.6
Magna Mitral 23Subject's Average Platelet Count6 Months231.1 10^3 platelets per microliterStandard Deviation 77.7
Magna Mitral 23Subject's Average Platelet Count1 Year199.7 10^3 platelets per microliterStandard Deviation 39.5
Magna Mitral 23Subject's Average Platelet Count2 Year201.8 10^3 platelets per microliterStandard Deviation 63.8
Magna Mitral 23Subject's Average Platelet Count3 Year217.9 10^3 platelets per microliterStandard Deviation 78
Magna Mitral 23Subject's Average Platelet Count4 Year236.3 10^3 platelets per microliterStandard Deviation 98.8
Magna Mitral 23Subject's Average Platelet Count5 Year208.6 10^3 platelets per microliterStandard Deviation 71.8
Other Pre-specified

Subject's Average Red Blood Cells Count

Laboratory Analysis of Red Blood Cell (RBC) Count on blood drawn from subjects; RBC carry oxygen.

Time frame: Baseline, 6 Month, 1 Year, 2 Years, 3 Years, 4 Years, and 5 Years post-implant

Population: The outcome is reported for subjects who received the Magna Mitral, Model 7000TFX device where data is available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Magna Mitral 23Subject's Average Red Blood Cells CountBaseline4.1 10^6 cells/microlitersStandard Deviation 0.7
Magna Mitral 23Subject's Average Red Blood Cells Count6 Month4.4 10^6 cells/microlitersStandard Deviation 0.9
Magna Mitral 23Subject's Average Red Blood Cells Count1 Year4.4 10^6 cells/microlitersStandard Deviation 0.3
Magna Mitral 23Subject's Average Red Blood Cells Count2 Year4.1 10^6 cells/microlitersStandard Deviation 0.6
Magna Mitral 23Subject's Average Red Blood Cells Count3 Year3.9 10^6 cells/microlitersStandard Deviation 1
Magna Mitral 23Subject's Average Red Blood Cells Count4 Year4.1 10^6 cells/microlitersStandard Deviation 0.6
Magna Mitral 23Subject's Average Red Blood Cells Count5 Year4.0 10^6 cells/microlitersStandard Deviation 0.6
Other Pre-specified

Subject's Average Score on the EQ-5D- Quality of Life Questionnaire Over Time

The EQ-5D is a standardized questionnaire that asks subjects to rate themselves (no problems, some problems, extreme problems) on mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. The scale is indexed and ranges from a minimum of 0.275 and a maximum of 1.000. A lower number indicates the participants experiences more problems and a higher number indicates the participants experiences fewer problems.

Time frame: 6 Months and 1 Year post-implant

Population: The outcome is reported for subjects who received the Magna Mitral, Model 7000TFX device where data is available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Magna Mitral 23Subject's Average Score on the EQ-5D- Quality of Life Questionnaire Over TimeBaseline0.86 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.07
Magna Mitral 23Subject's Average Score on the EQ-5D- Quality of Life Questionnaire Over Time6 Month0.94 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.07
Magna Mitral 23Subject's Average Score on the EQ-5D- Quality of Life Questionnaire Over Time1 Year0.89 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.11
Other Pre-specified

Subject's Average White Blood Cell Count

Laboratory analysis of White Blood Cell (WBC) Count on blood drawn from subject; WBC fight infection.

Time frame: Baseline, 6 Month, 1 Year, 2 Years, 3 Years, 4 Years, and 5 Years post-implant

Population: The outcome is reported for subjects who received the Magna Mitral, Model 7000TFX device where data is available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Magna Mitral 23Subject's Average White Blood Cell CountBaseline7.1 10^3 cells /microliterStandard Deviation 1.7
Magna Mitral 23Subject's Average White Blood Cell Count6 Month7.5 10^3 cells /microliterStandard Deviation 2.4
Magna Mitral 23Subject's Average White Blood Cell Count1 Year7.4 10^3 cells /microliterStandard Deviation 2.3
Magna Mitral 23Subject's Average White Blood Cell Count2 Year7.4 10^3 cells /microliterStandard Deviation 1.8
Magna Mitral 23Subject's Average White Blood Cell Count3 Year7.1 10^3 cells /microliterStandard Deviation 1.8
Magna Mitral 23Subject's Average White Blood Cell Count4 Year8.9 10^3 cells /microliterStandard Deviation 3
Magna Mitral 23Subject's Average White Blood Cell Count5 Year7.1 10^3 cells /microliterStandard Deviation 1.4
Other Pre-specified

Subject's New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class Compared to Baseline

The New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classification system relates symptoms to everyday activities and the patient's quality of life. Class I. No limitation of physical activity. Ordinary physical activity does not cause undue fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea (shortness of breath). Class II. Slight limitation of physical activity. Comfortable at rest. Ordinary physical activity results in fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea (shortness of breath). Class III. Marked limitation of physical activity. Comfortable at rest. Less than ordinary activity causes fatigue, palpitation, or dyspnea. Class IV. Unable to carry on any physical activity without discomfort. Symptoms of heart failure at rest. If any physical activity is undertaken, discomfort increases.

Time frame: 6 Months, 1 Year, 2 Years, 3 Years, 4 Years, and 5 Years post-implant

Population: The outcome is reported for subjects who received the Magna Mitral, Model 7000TFX device where data is available.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Magna Mitral 23Subject's New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class Compared to Baseline3 YearImproved7 Participants
Magna Mitral 23Subject's New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class Compared to Baseline4 YearWorsened1 Participants
Magna Mitral 23Subject's New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class Compared to Baseline5 YearImproved3 Participants
Magna Mitral 23Subject's New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class Compared to Baseline6 MonthsImproved7 Participants
Magna Mitral 23Subject's New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class Compared to Baseline6 MonthsSame2 Participants
Magna Mitral 23Subject's New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class Compared to Baseline6 MonthsWorsened0 Participants
Magna Mitral 23Subject's New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class Compared to Baseline1 YearImproved8 Participants
Magna Mitral 23Subject's New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class Compared to Baseline1 YearSame1 Participants
Magna Mitral 23Subject's New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class Compared to Baseline1 YearWorsened0 Participants
Magna Mitral 23Subject's New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class Compared to Baseline2 YearImproved7 Participants
Magna Mitral 23Subject's New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class Compared to Baseline2 YearSame2 Participants
Magna Mitral 23Subject's New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class Compared to Baseline2 YearWorsened0 Participants
Magna Mitral 23Subject's New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class Compared to Baseline3 YearSame1 Participants
Magna Mitral 23Subject's New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class Compared to Baseline3 YearWorsened1 Participants
Magna Mitral 23Subject's New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class Compared to Baseline4 YearImproved5 Participants
Magna Mitral 23Subject's New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class Compared to Baseline4 YearSame2 Participants
Magna Mitral 23Subject's New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class Compared to Baseline5 YearSame2 Participants
Magna Mitral 23Subject's New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class Compared to Baseline5 YearWorsened2 Participants
Other Pre-specified

Subject's Severity of Central Mitral Regurgitation at 1 Year Post-implant.

Mitral valvular regurgitation occurs when the mitral valve in the heart does not close tightly allowing some of the blood that was pumped out of the heart to leak back into it. Mitral valvular regurgitation is evaluated by echocardiography over time. It is assessed on a scale from 0 to 4, where 0 represents no regurgitation and 4 represents severe regurgitation.

Time frame: 1 Year post-implant

Population: The outcome is reported for subjects who received the Magna Mitral, Model 7000TFX device where data is available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Magna Mitral 23Subject's Severity of Central Mitral Regurgitation at 1 Year Post-implant.None3 Participants
Magna Mitral 23Subject's Severity of Central Mitral Regurgitation at 1 Year Post-implant.+1 Trivial/Trace5 Participants
Magna Mitral 23Subject's Severity of Central Mitral Regurgitation at 1 Year Post-implant.+2 Mild1 Participants
Magna Mitral 23Subject's Severity of Central Mitral Regurgitation at 1 Year Post-implant.+3 Modearte0 Participants
Magna Mitral 23Subject's Severity of Central Mitral Regurgitation at 1 Year Post-implant.+4 Severe0 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026