Mitral Heart Valve Disease
Conditions
Keywords
Mitral Valve Replacement, 23mm CEP, Magna
Brief summary
The purpose of this clinical study is to obtain human clinical data that demonstrates that the size 23mm Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT Magna mitral pericardial valve, model 7000TFX, is a safe and effective replacement heart valve.
Detailed description
This is a prospective, non-randomized, multi-site, descriptive study. A minimum of 15 and up to 20 subjects will be implanted at a minimum of 2 and up to 8 participating investigational sites within the US and internationally.
Interventions
Heart valve surgery: CEP Magna Mitral Model 7000 TFX
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
1. Patient has mitral valve disease requiring surgical replacement 2. Patient has provided written informed consent prior to mitral valve surgery 3. Patient is expected to survive surgery and be discharged 4. Patient is willing to comply with specified follow-up evaluations 5. Patient is 13 years of age or older
Exclusion criteria
1. Patient has life expectancy \< 12 months due to non-cardiac co-morbid conditions; 2. Patient has/had active endocarditis within the last 3 months 3. Patient requires replacement of a native or previously implanted prosthetic, tricuspid, pulmonic or aortic valve; 4. Patient was previously enrolled and implanted in the study 5. Patient has/had prior aortic, tricuspid and/ or pulmonary valve surgery, which included implantation of a bioprosthetic valve or mechanical valve that will remain in situ 6. Patient has a body surface area (BSA) \> 1.9m2 7. Female patients who are pregnant, planning to become pregnant, or lactating 8. Patient has a documented history of substance ( drug or alcohol) abuse 9. Patient is currently a prison inmate 10. Patient is currently participating in an investigational drug or another device study 11. Patient is undergoing renal dialysis for chronic renal failure or has hyperparathyroidism 12. Patient has active myocarditis 13. Patient has had an acute preoperative neurological deficit, myocardial infarction, or cardiac event and has not returned to baseline or stabilized \> 30 days prior to the planned v alve implant surgery 14. Patient has an abnormality such as an aortic aneurysm (e.g. due to cystic medial necrosis or Marfan's syndrome), aortic dissection, or ventricular aneurysm that might place
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percent of Early Adverse Events Divided | Events occuring within 30 days of procedure | Number of early adverse events occurring within 30 days of procedure divided by the number of enrolled subjects times 100. |
| Percent of Late Adverse Events | Events occurring >= 31 days and up through 5 years post-implant | Number of late events divided by the total number of late patient years times 100. Late patient years are calculated from 31 days post-implant to the date of the last contact (follow up or adverse event). |
| Percentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 Days | >30 Days, 1 Year, 2 Years, 3 Years, 4 Years, and 5 Years post-implant | Subject's freedom from Serious Adverse Events at \> 30 days post-implant. Time to events were estimated by Kaplan-Meier method. |
| Subject's Average Effective Orifice Area (EOA) Measurement | Pre-procedure and 1 Year post-Implant | Effective orifice area represents the cross-sectional area of the blood flow downstream of the mitral valve. Effective orifice area is evaluated by echocardiography over time. |
Other
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Subject's Average Cardiac Output | Pre-procedure and 1 Year post-implant | The amount of blood the heart pumps through the circulatory system in a minute. |
| Subject's Average Cardiac Index | Pre-procedure and 1 Year post-implant | Cardiac index is an assessment that divides the cardiac output from the left ventricle in one minute by the person's body surface area (BSA), thus relating heart performance to the size of the individual. |
| Subject's Average Left Ventricular Mass Regression | Pre-procedure and 1 Year post-implant | Patients can experience an enlargement of the left ventricle (chamber) of their heart because it works harder with a defective heart valve. Left ventricular mass regression evaluates if the patient experiences a decrease in the size of the left ventricle (chamber) after the repair or replacement of their heart valve. |
| Subject's Severity of Central Mitral Regurgitation at 1 Year Post-implant. | 1 Year post-implant | Mitral valvular regurgitation occurs when the mitral valve in the heart does not close tightly allowing some of the blood that was pumped out of the heart to leak back into it. Mitral valvular regurgitation is evaluated by echocardiography over time. It is assessed on a scale from 0 to 4, where 0 represents no regurgitation and 4 represents severe regurgitation. |
| Subject's Average Red Blood Cells Count | Baseline, 6 Month, 1 Year, 2 Years, 3 Years, 4 Years, and 5 Years post-implant | Laboratory Analysis of Red Blood Cell (RBC) Count on blood drawn from subjects; RBC carry oxygen. |
| Subject's Average White Blood Cell Count | Baseline, 6 Month, 1 Year, 2 Years, 3 Years, 4 Years, and 5 Years post-implant | Laboratory analysis of White Blood Cell (WBC) Count on blood drawn from subject; WBC fight infection. |
| Subject's Average Mean Gradient Measurement | Pre-procedure and 1 Year post-implant | Mean gradient is the average flow of blood through the mitral valve measured in millimeters of mercury. Gradients are evaluated by echocardiography over time. Mean gradient values depend on the size and type of valve. |
| Subject's Average Plasma Free Hemoglobin | Baseline, 6 Month, 1 Year, 2 Years, 3 Years, 4 Years, and 5 Years post-implant | Laboratory Analysis of Plasma Free Hemoglobin on blood drawn from subjects. This blood test measures the level of free hemoglobin in the plasma (liquid portion of the blood). |
| Subject's Average Hemoglobin Count | Baseline, 6 Month, 1 Year, 2 Years, 3 Years, 4 Years, and 5 Years post-implant | Laboratory Analysis of Hemoglobin Count on blood drawn from subjects. Hemoglobin is an oxygen-carrying protein in red blood cells. |
| Subject's Average Platelet Count | Baseline, 6 Month, 1 Year, 2 Years, 3 Years, 4 Years, and 5 Years post-implant | Laboratory Analysis of Platelet Count on blood drawn from subjects; platelets help with blood clotting. |
| Number and Percentage of Subjects in NYHA Functional Class I or II at 1 Year Post-Implant. | Baseline and 1 Year post-implant | The New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classification system relates symptoms to everyday activities and the patient's quality of life. Class I. No limitation of physical activity. Ordinary physical activity does not cause undue fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea (shortness of breath). Class II. Slight limitation of physical activity. Comfortable at rest. Ordinary physical activity results in fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea (shortness of breath). |
| Subject's New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class Compared to Baseline | 6 Months, 1 Year, 2 Years, 3 Years, 4 Years, and 5 Years post-implant | The New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classification system relates symptoms to everyday activities and the patient's quality of life. Class I. No limitation of physical activity. Ordinary physical activity does not cause undue fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea (shortness of breath). Class II. Slight limitation of physical activity. Comfortable at rest. Ordinary physical activity results in fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea (shortness of breath). Class III. Marked limitation of physical activity. Comfortable at rest. Less than ordinary activity causes fatigue, palpitation, or dyspnea. Class IV. Unable to carry on any physical activity without discomfort. Symptoms of heart failure at rest. If any physical activity is undertaken, discomfort increases. |
| Subject's Average Score on the EQ-5D- Quality of Life Questionnaire Over Time | 6 Months and 1 Year post-implant | The EQ-5D is a standardized questionnaire that asks subjects to rate themselves (no problems, some problems, extreme problems) on mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. The scale is indexed and ranges from a minimum of 0.275 and a maximum of 1.000. A lower number indicates the participants experiences more problems and a higher number indicates the participants experiences fewer problems. |
| Subject's Average Hematocrit Percentage | Baseline, 6 Month, 1 Year, 2 Years, 3 Years, 4 Years, and 5 Years post-implant | Laboratory Analysis of Hematocrit Percentage on blood drawn from subjects. Hematocrit is the proportion of red blood cells to the plasma (liquid portion of the blood). |
| Subject's Average Peak Gradient Measurement | Pre-procedure and 1 Year post-implant | Peak gradient is the maximum value measured of flow of blood through the mitral valve as measured in millimeters of mercury. Gradients are evaluated by echocardiography over time. |
| Subject's Average Effective Orifice Area Index (EOAI) Measurement | Pre-procedure and 1 Year post-implant | Effective orifice area index represents the minimal cross-sectional area of the blood flow downstream of the mitral valve divided by the person's body surface area. Effective orifice area index is evaluated by echocardiography over time. |
| Subject's Average Performance Index Measurement | Pre-procedure and 1 Year post-Implant | Performance index is defined as the subject's effective orifice area (the cross sectional area of the blood flow downstream of the mitral valve) divided by the subject's native orifice area. Effective orifice area is evaluated by echocardiography over time. |
Countries
Poland, United States
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Magna Mitral 23 Clinical Evaluation of the size 23 mm Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT Magna Mitral Bioprosthesis, Model 7000TFX | 12 |
| Total | 12 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Death | 3 |
| Overall Study | Not Implanted with Device | 27 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 2 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Magna Mitral 23 | — |
|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 67.5 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 14 | — |
| Race and Ethnicity Not Collected | — | — Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 12 Participants | — |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 0 Participants | — |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk |
|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 3 / 12 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 11 / 12 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 12 / 12 |
Outcome results
Percentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 Days
Subject's freedom from Serious Adverse Events at \> 30 days post-implant. Time to events were estimated by Kaplan-Meier method.
Time frame: >30 Days, 1 Year, 2 Years, 3 Years, 4 Years, and 5 Years post-implant
Population: The outcome is reported for subjects who received the Magna Mitral, Model 7000TFX device where data is available.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Magna Mitral 23 | Percentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 Days | Death | 100.00 percentage of subjects |
| Magna Mitral 23 | Percentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 Days | Bleeding Event | 100.00 percentage of subjects |
| Magna Mitral 23 | Percentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 Days | Major Perivalvular Leak | 100.00 percentage of subjects |
| Magna Mitral 23 | Percentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 Days | Reoperation | 100.00 percentage of subjects |
| Magna Mitral 23 | Percentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 Days | Major Bleeding Event | 100.00 percentage of subjects |
| Magna Mitral 23 | Percentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 Days | Non-structural Valve Dysfunction | 100.00 percentage of subjects |
| Magna Mitral 23 | Percentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 Days | Structural Valve Deterioration | 100.00 percentage of subjects |
| Magna Mitral 23 | Percentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 Days | Explant | 100.00 percentage of subjects |
| Magna Mitral 23 | Percentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 Days | Thromboembolism | 100.00 percentage of subjects |
| Magna Mitral 23 | Percentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 Days | Perivalvular Leak | 100.00 percentage of subjects |
| Magna Mitral 23 | Percentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 Days | Valve Thrombosis | 100.00 percentage of subjects |
| Magna Mitral 23 | Percentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 Days | Valve-related Death | 100.00 percentage of subjects |
| Magna Mitral 23 | Percentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 Days | Endocarditis | 100.00 percentage of subjects |
| Magna Mitral 23 | Percentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 Days | Hemolysis | 100.00 percentage of subjects |
| Magna Mitral 23 - 1 Year Post-implant | Percentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 Days | Major Bleeding Event | 90.00 percentage of subjects |
| Magna Mitral 23 - 1 Year Post-implant | Percentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 Days | Perivalvular Leak | 100.00 percentage of subjects |
| Magna Mitral 23 - 1 Year Post-implant | Percentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 Days | Endocarditis | 100.00 percentage of subjects |
| Magna Mitral 23 - 1 Year Post-implant | Percentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 Days | Major Perivalvular Leak | 100.00 percentage of subjects |
| Magna Mitral 23 - 1 Year Post-implant | Percentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 Days | Valve Thrombosis | 100.00 percentage of subjects |
| Magna Mitral 23 - 1 Year Post-implant | Percentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 Days | Valve-related Death | 100.0 percentage of subjects |
| Magna Mitral 23 - 1 Year Post-implant | Percentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 Days | Structural Valve Deterioration | 100.00 percentage of subjects |
| Magna Mitral 23 - 1 Year Post-implant | Percentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 Days | Reoperation | 100.00 percentage of subjects |
| Magna Mitral 23 - 1 Year Post-implant | Percentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 Days | Non-structural Valve Dysfunction | 100.00 percentage of subjects |
| Magna Mitral 23 - 1 Year Post-implant | Percentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 Days | Explant | 100.00 percentage of subjects |
| Magna Mitral 23 - 1 Year Post-implant | Percentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 Days | Bleeding Event | 90.00 percentage of subjects |
| Magna Mitral 23 - 1 Year Post-implant | Percentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 Days | Hemolysis | 100.00 percentage of subjects |
| Magna Mitral 23 - 1 Year Post-implant | Percentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 Days | Thromboembolism | 100.00 percentage of subjects |
| Magna Mitral 23 - 1 Year Post-implant | Percentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 Days | Death | 90.91 percentage of subjects |
| Magna Mitral 23 - 2 Years Post-implant | Percentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 Days | Hemolysis | 100.00 percentage of subjects |
| Magna Mitral 23 - 2 Years Post-implant | Percentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 Days | Structural Valve Deterioration | 100.00 percentage of subjects |
| Magna Mitral 23 - 2 Years Post-implant | Percentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 Days | Thromboembolism | 88.89 percentage of subjects |
| Magna Mitral 23 - 2 Years Post-implant | Percentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 Days | Bleeding Event | 90.00 percentage of subjects |
| Magna Mitral 23 - 2 Years Post-implant | Percentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 Days | Major Perivalvular Leak | 100.00 percentage of subjects |
| Magna Mitral 23 - 2 Years Post-implant | Percentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 Days | Death | 90.91 percentage of subjects |
| Magna Mitral 23 - 2 Years Post-implant | Percentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 Days | Valve-related Death | 100.0 percentage of subjects |
| Magna Mitral 23 - 2 Years Post-implant | Percentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 Days | Endocarditis | 100.00 percentage of subjects |
| Magna Mitral 23 - 2 Years Post-implant | Percentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 Days | Perivalvular Leak | 100.00 percentage of subjects |
| Magna Mitral 23 - 2 Years Post-implant | Percentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 Days | Non-structural Valve Dysfunction | 100.00 percentage of subjects |
| Magna Mitral 23 - 2 Years Post-implant | Percentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 Days | Major Bleeding Event | 90.00 percentage of subjects |
| Magna Mitral 23 - 2 Years Post-implant | Percentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 Days | Explant | 100.00 percentage of subjects |
| Magna Mitral 23 - 2 Years Post-implant | Percentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 Days | Valve Thrombosis | 100.00 percentage of subjects |
| Magna Mitral 23 - 2 Years Post-implant | Percentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 Days | Reoperation | 100.00 percentage of subjects |
| Magna Mitral 23 - 3 Years Post-implant | Percentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 Days | Bleeding Event | 90.00 percentage of subjects |
| Magna Mitral 23 - 3 Years Post-implant | Percentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 Days | Death | 90.91 percentage of subjects |
| Magna Mitral 23 - 3 Years Post-implant | Percentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 Days | Valve-related Death | 100.0 percentage of subjects |
| Magna Mitral 23 - 3 Years Post-implant | Percentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 Days | Reoperation | 100.00 percentage of subjects |
| Magna Mitral 23 - 3 Years Post-implant | Percentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 Days | Explant | 100.00 percentage of subjects |
| Magna Mitral 23 - 3 Years Post-implant | Percentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 Days | Major Perivalvular Leak | 100.00 percentage of subjects |
| Magna Mitral 23 - 3 Years Post-implant | Percentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 Days | Major Bleeding Event | 90.00 percentage of subjects |
| Magna Mitral 23 - 3 Years Post-implant | Percentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 Days | Thromboembolism | 88.89 percentage of subjects |
| Magna Mitral 23 - 3 Years Post-implant | Percentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 Days | Endocarditis | 100.00 percentage of subjects |
| Magna Mitral 23 - 3 Years Post-implant | Percentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 Days | Perivalvular Leak | 100.00 percentage of subjects |
| Magna Mitral 23 - 3 Years Post-implant | Percentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 Days | Hemolysis | 100.00 percentage of subjects |
| Magna Mitral 23 - 3 Years Post-implant | Percentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 Days | Non-structural Valve Dysfunction | 100.00 percentage of subjects |
| Magna Mitral 23 - 3 Years Post-implant | Percentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 Days | Structural Valve Deterioration | 100.00 percentage of subjects |
| Magna Mitral 23 - 3 Years Post-implant | Percentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 Days | Valve Thrombosis | 100.00 percentage of subjects |
| Magna Mitral 23 - 4 Years Post-implant | Percentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 Days | Death | 80.81 percentage of subjects |
| Magna Mitral 23 - 4 Years Post-implant | Percentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 Days | Perivalvular Leak | 100.00 percentage of subjects |
| Magna Mitral 23 - 4 Years Post-implant | Percentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 Days | Major Bleeding Event | 90.00 percentage of subjects |
| Magna Mitral 23 - 4 Years Post-implant | Percentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 Days | Major Perivalvular Leak | 100.00 percentage of subjects |
| Magna Mitral 23 - 4 Years Post-implant | Percentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 Days | Bleeding Event | 90.00 percentage of subjects |
| Magna Mitral 23 - 4 Years Post-implant | Percentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 Days | Hemolysis | 100.00 percentage of subjects |
| Magna Mitral 23 - 4 Years Post-implant | Percentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 Days | Explant | 100.00 percentage of subjects |
| Magna Mitral 23 - 4 Years Post-implant | Percentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 Days | Reoperation | 100.00 percentage of subjects |
| Magna Mitral 23 - 4 Years Post-implant | Percentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 Days | Non-structural Valve Dysfunction | 100.00 percentage of subjects |
| Magna Mitral 23 - 4 Years Post-implant | Percentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 Days | Valve-related Death | 88.89 percentage of subjects |
| Magna Mitral 23 - 4 Years Post-implant | Percentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 Days | Valve Thrombosis | 100.00 percentage of subjects |
| Magna Mitral 23 - 4 Years Post-implant | Percentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 Days | Structural Valve Deterioration | 100.00 percentage of subjects |
| Magna Mitral 23 - 4 Years Post-implant | Percentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 Days | Endocarditis | 88.89 percentage of subjects |
| Magna Mitral 23 - 4 Years Post-implant | Percentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 Days | Thromboembolism | 88.89 percentage of subjects |
| Magna Mitral 23 - 5 Years Post-implant | Percentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 Days | Structural Valve Deterioration | 87.50 percentage of subjects |
| Magna Mitral 23 - 5 Years Post-implant | Percentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 Days | Valve Thrombosis | 100.00 percentage of subjects |
| Magna Mitral 23 - 5 Years Post-implant | Percentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 Days | Perivalvular Leak | 100.00 percentage of subjects |
| Magna Mitral 23 - 5 Years Post-implant | Percentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 Days | Death | 80.81 percentage of subjects |
| Magna Mitral 23 - 5 Years Post-implant | Percentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 Days | Valve-related Death | 88.89 percentage of subjects |
| Magna Mitral 23 - 5 Years Post-implant | Percentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 Days | Major Perivalvular Leak | 100.00 percentage of subjects |
| Magna Mitral 23 - 5 Years Post-implant | Percentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 Days | Bleeding Event | 90.00 percentage of subjects |
| Magna Mitral 23 - 5 Years Post-implant | Percentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 Days | Major Bleeding Event | 90.00 percentage of subjects |
| Magna Mitral 23 - 5 Years Post-implant | Percentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 Days | Explant | 87.50 percentage of subjects |
| Magna Mitral 23 - 5 Years Post-implant | Percentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 Days | Non-structural Valve Dysfunction | 100.00 percentage of subjects |
| Magna Mitral 23 - 5 Years Post-implant | Percentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 Days | Endocarditis | 88.89 percentage of subjects |
| Magna Mitral 23 - 5 Years Post-implant | Percentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 Days | Hemolysis | 100.00 percentage of subjects |
| Magna Mitral 23 - 5 Years Post-implant | Percentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 Days | Thromboembolism | 88.89 percentage of subjects |
| Magna Mitral 23 - 5 Years Post-implant | Percentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 Days | Reoperation | 87.50 percentage of subjects |
Percent of Early Adverse Events Divided
Number of early adverse events occurring within 30 days of procedure divided by the number of enrolled subjects times 100.
Time frame: Events occuring within 30 days of procedure
Population: The outcome is reported for subjects who received the Magna Mitral, Model 7000TFX device where data is available.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Magna Mitral 23 | Percent of Early Adverse Events Divided | Major Clinically Significant PVL | 0.0 percentage of subjects |
| Magna Mitral 23 | Percent of Early Adverse Events Divided | Hemolysis | 0.0 percentage of subjects |
| Magna Mitral 23 | Percent of Early Adverse Events Divided | Endocarditis | 0.0 percentage of subjects |
| Magna Mitral 23 | Percent of Early Adverse Events Divided | Structural Valve Deterioration | 0.0 percentage of subjects |
| Magna Mitral 23 | Percent of Early Adverse Events Divided | Reoperation | 0.0 percentage of subjects |
| Magna Mitral 23 | Percent of Early Adverse Events Divided | Valve Thrombosis | 0.0 percentage of subjects |
| Magna Mitral 23 | Percent of Early Adverse Events Divided | Hemorrhage | 0.0 percentage of subjects |
| Magna Mitral 23 | Percent of Early Adverse Events Divided | Major Hemorrhage | 0.0 percentage of subjects |
| Magna Mitral 23 | Percent of Early Adverse Events Divided | Death | 8.3 percentage of subjects |
| Magna Mitral 23 | Percent of Early Adverse Events Divided | Valve-Related Death | 0.0 percentage of subjects |
| Magna Mitral 23 | Percent of Early Adverse Events Divided | Thromboembolism | 0.0 percentage of subjects |
| Magna Mitral 23 | Percent of Early Adverse Events Divided | Non-Structural Valve Dysfunction (study valve) | 8.3 percentage of subjects |
| Magna Mitral 23 | Percent of Early Adverse Events Divided | All Clinically Significant PVL | 8.3 percentage of subjects |
| Magna Mitral 23 | Percent of Early Adverse Events Divided | Explant | 0.0 percentage of subjects |
Percent of Late Adverse Events
Number of late events divided by the total number of late patient years times 100. Late patient years are calculated from 31 days post-implant to the date of the last contact (follow up or adverse event).
Time frame: Events occurring >= 31 days and up through 5 years post-implant
Population: The outcome is reported for subjects who received the Magna Mitral, Model 7000TFX device where data is available.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Magna Mitral 23 | Percent of Late Adverse Events | Explant | 6.7 percentage of events/late patient years |
| Magna Mitral 23 | Percent of Late Adverse Events | Death | 4.5 percentage of events/late patient years |
| Magna Mitral 23 | Percent of Late Adverse Events | Valve-Related Death | 2.2 percentage of events/late patient years |
| Magna Mitral 23 | Percent of Late Adverse Events | Thromboembolism | 2.2 percentage of events/late patient years |
| Magna Mitral 23 | Percent of Late Adverse Events | Valve Thrombosis | 0.0 percentage of events/late patient years |
| Magna Mitral 23 | Percent of Late Adverse Events | Hemorrhage | 2.2 percentage of events/late patient years |
| Magna Mitral 23 | Percent of Late Adverse Events | Major Hemorrhage | 2.2 percentage of events/late patient years |
| Magna Mitral 23 | Percent of Late Adverse Events | Non-Structural Valve Dysfunction (study valve) | 0.0 percentage of events/late patient years |
| Magna Mitral 23 | Percent of Late Adverse Events | All Clinically Significant PVL | 0.0 percentage of events/late patient years |
| Magna Mitral 23 | Percent of Late Adverse Events | Major Clinically Significant PVL | 0.0 percentage of events/late patient years |
| Magna Mitral 23 | Percent of Late Adverse Events | Hemolysis | 0.0 percentage of events/late patient years |
| Magna Mitral 23 | Percent of Late Adverse Events | Endocarditis | 2.2 percentage of events/late patient years |
| Magna Mitral 23 | Percent of Late Adverse Events | Structural Valve Deterioration | 6.7 percentage of events/late patient years |
| Magna Mitral 23 | Percent of Late Adverse Events | Reoperation | 6.7 percentage of events/late patient years |
Subject's Average Effective Orifice Area (EOA) Measurement
Effective orifice area represents the cross-sectional area of the blood flow downstream of the mitral valve. Effective orifice area is evaluated by echocardiography over time.
Time frame: Pre-procedure and 1 Year post-Implant
Population: The outcome is reported for subjects who received the Magna Mitral, Model 7000TFX device where data is available.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Magna Mitral 23 | Subject's Average Effective Orifice Area (EOA) Measurement | Pre-Procedure | 0.8 Centimeters Squared | Standard Deviation 0.2 |
| Magna Mitral 23 | Subject's Average Effective Orifice Area (EOA) Measurement | 1 Year | 1.2 Centimeters Squared | Standard Deviation 0.2 |
Number and Percentage of Subjects in NYHA Functional Class I or II at 1 Year Post-Implant.
The New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classification system relates symptoms to everyday activities and the patient's quality of life. Class I. No limitation of physical activity. Ordinary physical activity does not cause undue fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea (shortness of breath). Class II. Slight limitation of physical activity. Comfortable at rest. Ordinary physical activity results in fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea (shortness of breath).
Time frame: Baseline and 1 Year post-implant
Population: The outcome is reported for subjects who received the Magna Mitral, Model 7000TFX device where data is available.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Magna Mitral 23 | Number and Percentage of Subjects in NYHA Functional Class I or II at 1 Year Post-Implant. | Class II | 5 Participants |
| Magna Mitral 23 | Number and Percentage of Subjects in NYHA Functional Class I or II at 1 Year Post-Implant. | Class I | 1 Participants |
| Magna Mitral 23 - 1 Year Post-implant | Number and Percentage of Subjects in NYHA Functional Class I or II at 1 Year Post-Implant. | Class I | 7 Participants |
| Magna Mitral 23 - 1 Year Post-implant | Number and Percentage of Subjects in NYHA Functional Class I or II at 1 Year Post-Implant. | Class II | 1 Participants |
Subject's Average Cardiac Index
Cardiac index is an assessment that divides the cardiac output from the left ventricle in one minute by the person's body surface area (BSA), thus relating heart performance to the size of the individual.
Time frame: Pre-procedure and 1 Year post-implant
Population: The outcome is reported for subjects who received the Magna Mitral, Model 7000TFX device where data is available.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Magna Mitral 23 | Subject's Average Cardiac Index | Pre-Procedure | 2.4 L/min/m2 | Standard Deviation 0.4 |
| Magna Mitral 23 | Subject's Average Cardiac Index | 1 Year | 2.9 L/min/m2 | Standard Deviation 0.5 |
Subject's Average Cardiac Output
The amount of blood the heart pumps through the circulatory system in a minute.
Time frame: Pre-procedure and 1 Year post-implant
Population: The outcome is reported for subjects who received the Magna Mitral, Model 7000TFX device where data is available.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Magna Mitral 23 | Subject's Average Cardiac Output | Pre-Procedure | 4.0 Liters/minute | Standard Deviation 0.8 |
| Magna Mitral 23 | Subject's Average Cardiac Output | 1 Year | 4.8 Liters/minute | Standard Deviation 0.7 |
Subject's Average Effective Orifice Area Index (EOAI) Measurement
Effective orifice area index represents the minimal cross-sectional area of the blood flow downstream of the mitral valve divided by the person's body surface area. Effective orifice area index is evaluated by echocardiography over time.
Time frame: Pre-procedure and 1 Year post-implant
Population: The outcome is reported for subjects who received the Magna Mitral, Model 7000TFX device where data is available.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Magna Mitral 23 | Subject's Average Effective Orifice Area Index (EOAI) Measurement | Pre-Procedure | 0.5 cm^2/m^2 | Standard Deviation 0.1 |
| Magna Mitral 23 | Subject's Average Effective Orifice Area Index (EOAI) Measurement | 1 Year | 0.7 cm^2/m^2 | Standard Deviation 0.1 |
Subject's Average Hematocrit Percentage
Laboratory Analysis of Hematocrit Percentage on blood drawn from subjects. Hematocrit is the proportion of red blood cells to the plasma (liquid portion of the blood).
Time frame: Baseline, 6 Month, 1 Year, 2 Years, 3 Years, 4 Years, and 5 Years post-implant
Population: The outcome is reported for subjects who received the Magna Mitral, Model 7000TFX device where data is available.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Magna Mitral 23 | Subject's Average Hematocrit Percentage | 1 Year | 41.2 percentage of red blood cells | Standard Deviation 3.4 |
| Magna Mitral 23 | Subject's Average Hematocrit Percentage | 2 Year | 39.7 percentage of red blood cells | Standard Deviation 4.3 |
| Magna Mitral 23 | Subject's Average Hematocrit Percentage | 3 Year | 36.3 percentage of red blood cells | Standard Deviation 7 |
| Magna Mitral 23 | Subject's Average Hematocrit Percentage | 4 Year | 40.1 percentage of red blood cells | Standard Deviation 4 |
| Magna Mitral 23 | Subject's Average Hematocrit Percentage | 5 Year | 37.4 percentage of red blood cells | Standard Deviation 3.7 |
| Magna Mitral 23 | Subject's Average Hematocrit Percentage | Baseline | 38.3 percentage of red blood cells | Standard Deviation 6 |
| Magna Mitral 23 | Subject's Average Hematocrit Percentage | 6 Month | 40.6 percentage of red blood cells | Standard Deviation 6.6 |
Subject's Average Hemoglobin Count
Laboratory Analysis of Hemoglobin Count on blood drawn from subjects. Hemoglobin is an oxygen-carrying protein in red blood cells.
Time frame: Baseline, 6 Month, 1 Year, 2 Years, 3 Years, 4 Years, and 5 Years post-implant
Population: The outcome is reported for subjects who received the Magna Mitral, Model 7000TFX device where data is available.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Magna Mitral 23 | Subject's Average Hemoglobin Count | 4 Year | 13.4 g/dl | Standard Deviation 1.7 |
| Magna Mitral 23 | Subject's Average Hemoglobin Count | 2 Year | 13.0 g/dl | Standard Deviation 1.7 |
| Magna Mitral 23 | Subject's Average Hemoglobin Count | Baseline | 12.5 g/dl | Standard Deviation 2.1 |
| Magna Mitral 23 | Subject's Average Hemoglobin Count | 6 Month | 13.3 g/dl | Standard Deviation 2.3 |
| Magna Mitral 23 | Subject's Average Hemoglobin Count | 1 Year | 13.5 g/dl | Standard Deviation 1.5 |
| Magna Mitral 23 | Subject's Average Hemoglobin Count | 3 Year | 12.1 g/dl | Standard Deviation 2.6 |
| Magna Mitral 23 | Subject's Average Hemoglobin Count | 5 Year | 12.1 g/dl | Standard Deviation 1.5 |
Subject's Average Left Ventricular Mass Regression
Patients can experience an enlargement of the left ventricle (chamber) of their heart because it works harder with a defective heart valve. Left ventricular mass regression evaluates if the patient experiences a decrease in the size of the left ventricle (chamber) after the repair or replacement of their heart valve.
Time frame: Pre-procedure and 1 Year post-implant
Population: The outcome is reported for subjects who received the Magna Mitral, Model 7000TFX device where data is available.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Magna Mitral 23 | Subject's Average Left Ventricular Mass Regression | 1 Year | 130.7 grams | Standard Deviation 35.1 |
| Magna Mitral 23 | Subject's Average Left Ventricular Mass Regression | Pre-Procedure | 161.0 grams | Standard Deviation 42.4 |
Subject's Average Mean Gradient Measurement
Mean gradient is the average flow of blood through the mitral valve measured in millimeters of mercury. Gradients are evaluated by echocardiography over time. Mean gradient values depend on the size and type of valve.
Time frame: Pre-procedure and 1 Year post-implant
Population: The outcome is reported for subjects who received the Magna Mitral, Model 7000TFX device where data is available.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Magna Mitral 23 | Subject's Average Mean Gradient Measurement | Pre-Procedure | 9.8 mmHg | Standard Deviation 5.3 |
| Magna Mitral 23 | Subject's Average Mean Gradient Measurement | 1 Year | 7.5 mmHg | Standard Deviation 1.7 |
Subject's Average Peak Gradient Measurement
Peak gradient is the maximum value measured of flow of blood through the mitral valve as measured in millimeters of mercury. Gradients are evaluated by echocardiography over time.
Time frame: Pre-procedure and 1 Year post-implant
Population: The outcome is reported for subjects who received the Magna Mitral, Model 7000TFX device where data is available.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Magna Mitral 23 | Subject's Average Peak Gradient Measurement | Pre-Procedure | 19.1 mmHg | Standard Deviation 7.5 |
| Magna Mitral 23 | Subject's Average Peak Gradient Measurement | 1 Year | 16.8 mmHg | Standard Deviation 5.1 |
Subject's Average Performance Index Measurement
Performance index is defined as the subject's effective orifice area (the cross sectional area of the blood flow downstream of the mitral valve) divided by the subject's native orifice area. Effective orifice area is evaluated by echocardiography over time.
Time frame: Pre-procedure and 1 Year post-Implant
Population: The outcome is reported for subjects who received the Magna Mitral, Model 7000TFX device where data is available.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Magna Mitral 23 | Subject's Average Performance Index Measurement | Pre-Procedure | 0.7 cm^2/cm^2 | Standard Deviation 0.2 |
| Magna Mitral 23 | Subject's Average Performance Index Measurement | 1 Year | 1.0 cm^2/cm^2 | Standard Deviation 0.1 |
Subject's Average Plasma Free Hemoglobin
Laboratory Analysis of Plasma Free Hemoglobin on blood drawn from subjects. This blood test measures the level of free hemoglobin in the plasma (liquid portion of the blood).
Time frame: Baseline, 6 Month, 1 Year, 2 Years, 3 Years, 4 Years, and 5 Years post-implant
Population: The outcome is reported for subjects who received the Magna Mitral, Model 7000TFX device where data is available.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Magna Mitral 23 | Subject's Average Plasma Free Hemoglobin | 2 Year | 14.8 mg/dl | Standard Deviation 9.2 |
| Magna Mitral 23 | Subject's Average Plasma Free Hemoglobin | Baseline | 12.9 mg/dl | Standard Deviation 13.9 |
| Magna Mitral 23 | Subject's Average Plasma Free Hemoglobin | 6 Month | 23.1 mg/dl | Standard Deviation 19.5 |
| Magna Mitral 23 | Subject's Average Plasma Free Hemoglobin | 1 Year | 11.2 mg/dl | Standard Deviation 11.8 |
| Magna Mitral 23 | Subject's Average Plasma Free Hemoglobin | 3 Year | 5.1 mg/dl | Standard Deviation 3.4 |
| Magna Mitral 23 | Subject's Average Plasma Free Hemoglobin | 4 Year | 22.3 mg/dl | Standard Deviation 15.6 |
| Magna Mitral 23 | Subject's Average Plasma Free Hemoglobin | 5 Year | 9.9 mg/dl | Standard Deviation 9.4 |
Subject's Average Platelet Count
Laboratory Analysis of Platelet Count on blood drawn from subjects; platelets help with blood clotting.
Time frame: Baseline, 6 Month, 1 Year, 2 Years, 3 Years, 4 Years, and 5 Years post-implant
Population: The outcome is reported for subjects who received the Magna Mitral, Model 7000TFX device where data is available.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Magna Mitral 23 | Subject's Average Platelet Count | Baseline | 244.8 10^3 platelets per microliter | Standard Deviation 95.6 |
| Magna Mitral 23 | Subject's Average Platelet Count | 6 Months | 231.1 10^3 platelets per microliter | Standard Deviation 77.7 |
| Magna Mitral 23 | Subject's Average Platelet Count | 1 Year | 199.7 10^3 platelets per microliter | Standard Deviation 39.5 |
| Magna Mitral 23 | Subject's Average Platelet Count | 2 Year | 201.8 10^3 platelets per microliter | Standard Deviation 63.8 |
| Magna Mitral 23 | Subject's Average Platelet Count | 3 Year | 217.9 10^3 platelets per microliter | Standard Deviation 78 |
| Magna Mitral 23 | Subject's Average Platelet Count | 4 Year | 236.3 10^3 platelets per microliter | Standard Deviation 98.8 |
| Magna Mitral 23 | Subject's Average Platelet Count | 5 Year | 208.6 10^3 platelets per microliter | Standard Deviation 71.8 |
Subject's Average Red Blood Cells Count
Laboratory Analysis of Red Blood Cell (RBC) Count on blood drawn from subjects; RBC carry oxygen.
Time frame: Baseline, 6 Month, 1 Year, 2 Years, 3 Years, 4 Years, and 5 Years post-implant
Population: The outcome is reported for subjects who received the Magna Mitral, Model 7000TFX device where data is available.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Magna Mitral 23 | Subject's Average Red Blood Cells Count | Baseline | 4.1 10^6 cells/microliters | Standard Deviation 0.7 |
| Magna Mitral 23 | Subject's Average Red Blood Cells Count | 6 Month | 4.4 10^6 cells/microliters | Standard Deviation 0.9 |
| Magna Mitral 23 | Subject's Average Red Blood Cells Count | 1 Year | 4.4 10^6 cells/microliters | Standard Deviation 0.3 |
| Magna Mitral 23 | Subject's Average Red Blood Cells Count | 2 Year | 4.1 10^6 cells/microliters | Standard Deviation 0.6 |
| Magna Mitral 23 | Subject's Average Red Blood Cells Count | 3 Year | 3.9 10^6 cells/microliters | Standard Deviation 1 |
| Magna Mitral 23 | Subject's Average Red Blood Cells Count | 4 Year | 4.1 10^6 cells/microliters | Standard Deviation 0.6 |
| Magna Mitral 23 | Subject's Average Red Blood Cells Count | 5 Year | 4.0 10^6 cells/microliters | Standard Deviation 0.6 |
Subject's Average Score on the EQ-5D- Quality of Life Questionnaire Over Time
The EQ-5D is a standardized questionnaire that asks subjects to rate themselves (no problems, some problems, extreme problems) on mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. The scale is indexed and ranges from a minimum of 0.275 and a maximum of 1.000. A lower number indicates the participants experiences more problems and a higher number indicates the participants experiences fewer problems.
Time frame: 6 Months and 1 Year post-implant
Population: The outcome is reported for subjects who received the Magna Mitral, Model 7000TFX device where data is available.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Magna Mitral 23 | Subject's Average Score on the EQ-5D- Quality of Life Questionnaire Over Time | Baseline | 0.86 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.07 |
| Magna Mitral 23 | Subject's Average Score on the EQ-5D- Quality of Life Questionnaire Over Time | 6 Month | 0.94 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.07 |
| Magna Mitral 23 | Subject's Average Score on the EQ-5D- Quality of Life Questionnaire Over Time | 1 Year | 0.89 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.11 |
Subject's Average White Blood Cell Count
Laboratory analysis of White Blood Cell (WBC) Count on blood drawn from subject; WBC fight infection.
Time frame: Baseline, 6 Month, 1 Year, 2 Years, 3 Years, 4 Years, and 5 Years post-implant
Population: The outcome is reported for subjects who received the Magna Mitral, Model 7000TFX device where data is available.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Magna Mitral 23 | Subject's Average White Blood Cell Count | Baseline | 7.1 10^3 cells /microliter | Standard Deviation 1.7 |
| Magna Mitral 23 | Subject's Average White Blood Cell Count | 6 Month | 7.5 10^3 cells /microliter | Standard Deviation 2.4 |
| Magna Mitral 23 | Subject's Average White Blood Cell Count | 1 Year | 7.4 10^3 cells /microliter | Standard Deviation 2.3 |
| Magna Mitral 23 | Subject's Average White Blood Cell Count | 2 Year | 7.4 10^3 cells /microliter | Standard Deviation 1.8 |
| Magna Mitral 23 | Subject's Average White Blood Cell Count | 3 Year | 7.1 10^3 cells /microliter | Standard Deviation 1.8 |
| Magna Mitral 23 | Subject's Average White Blood Cell Count | 4 Year | 8.9 10^3 cells /microliter | Standard Deviation 3 |
| Magna Mitral 23 | Subject's Average White Blood Cell Count | 5 Year | 7.1 10^3 cells /microliter | Standard Deviation 1.4 |
Subject's New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class Compared to Baseline
The New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classification system relates symptoms to everyday activities and the patient's quality of life. Class I. No limitation of physical activity. Ordinary physical activity does not cause undue fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea (shortness of breath). Class II. Slight limitation of physical activity. Comfortable at rest. Ordinary physical activity results in fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea (shortness of breath). Class III. Marked limitation of physical activity. Comfortable at rest. Less than ordinary activity causes fatigue, palpitation, or dyspnea. Class IV. Unable to carry on any physical activity without discomfort. Symptoms of heart failure at rest. If any physical activity is undertaken, discomfort increases.
Time frame: 6 Months, 1 Year, 2 Years, 3 Years, 4 Years, and 5 Years post-implant
Population: The outcome is reported for subjects who received the Magna Mitral, Model 7000TFX device where data is available.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Magna Mitral 23 | Subject's New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class Compared to Baseline | 3 Year | Improved | 7 Participants |
| Magna Mitral 23 | Subject's New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class Compared to Baseline | 4 Year | Worsened | 1 Participants |
| Magna Mitral 23 | Subject's New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class Compared to Baseline | 5 Year | Improved | 3 Participants |
| Magna Mitral 23 | Subject's New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class Compared to Baseline | 6 Months | Improved | 7 Participants |
| Magna Mitral 23 | Subject's New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class Compared to Baseline | 6 Months | Same | 2 Participants |
| Magna Mitral 23 | Subject's New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class Compared to Baseline | 6 Months | Worsened | 0 Participants |
| Magna Mitral 23 | Subject's New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class Compared to Baseline | 1 Year | Improved | 8 Participants |
| Magna Mitral 23 | Subject's New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class Compared to Baseline | 1 Year | Same | 1 Participants |
| Magna Mitral 23 | Subject's New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class Compared to Baseline | 1 Year | Worsened | 0 Participants |
| Magna Mitral 23 | Subject's New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class Compared to Baseline | 2 Year | Improved | 7 Participants |
| Magna Mitral 23 | Subject's New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class Compared to Baseline | 2 Year | Same | 2 Participants |
| Magna Mitral 23 | Subject's New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class Compared to Baseline | 2 Year | Worsened | 0 Participants |
| Magna Mitral 23 | Subject's New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class Compared to Baseline | 3 Year | Same | 1 Participants |
| Magna Mitral 23 | Subject's New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class Compared to Baseline | 3 Year | Worsened | 1 Participants |
| Magna Mitral 23 | Subject's New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class Compared to Baseline | 4 Year | Improved | 5 Participants |
| Magna Mitral 23 | Subject's New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class Compared to Baseline | 4 Year | Same | 2 Participants |
| Magna Mitral 23 | Subject's New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class Compared to Baseline | 5 Year | Same | 2 Participants |
| Magna Mitral 23 | Subject's New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class Compared to Baseline | 5 Year | Worsened | 2 Participants |
Subject's Severity of Central Mitral Regurgitation at 1 Year Post-implant.
Mitral valvular regurgitation occurs when the mitral valve in the heart does not close tightly allowing some of the blood that was pumped out of the heart to leak back into it. Mitral valvular regurgitation is evaluated by echocardiography over time. It is assessed on a scale from 0 to 4, where 0 represents no regurgitation and 4 represents severe regurgitation.
Time frame: 1 Year post-implant
Population: The outcome is reported for subjects who received the Magna Mitral, Model 7000TFX device where data is available.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Magna Mitral 23 | Subject's Severity of Central Mitral Regurgitation at 1 Year Post-implant. | None | 3 Participants |
| Magna Mitral 23 | Subject's Severity of Central Mitral Regurgitation at 1 Year Post-implant. | +1 Trivial/Trace | 5 Participants |
| Magna Mitral 23 | Subject's Severity of Central Mitral Regurgitation at 1 Year Post-implant. | +2 Mild | 1 Participants |
| Magna Mitral 23 | Subject's Severity of Central Mitral Regurgitation at 1 Year Post-implant. | +3 Modearte | 0 Participants |
| Magna Mitral 23 | Subject's Severity of Central Mitral Regurgitation at 1 Year Post-implant. | +4 Severe | 0 Participants |