Skip to content

Powered Bone Marrow Aspiration and Core Biopsy System Compared to Manual Devices

A Trial of the Vidacare Powered Bone Marrow Aspiration and Core Biopsy Systems (OnControl by Vidacare) Compared to Traditional Manual Devices

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01312519
Enrollment
50
Registered
2011-03-10
Start date
2010-01-31
Completion date
2010-08-31
Last updated
2025-12-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bone Marrow Biopsy Procedures

Keywords

Bone marrow biopsy of iliac crest

Brief summary

This is a randomized study evaluating use of a powered bone marrow biopsy and aspiration system (OnControl by Vidacare) compared to traditional manual devices. The hypothesis is that the powered system will reduce the level of patient pain during the aspiration and core biopsy procedures and the amount of time needed to perform the procedures.

Interventions

DEVICEOnControl Bone Marrow Biopsy and Aspiration System

Battery powered device used for insertion of a single lumen catheter into the intraosseous space of the adult iliac crest for the purpose of aspiration and core biopsy collection.

DEVICEManual bone marrow sampling device

Hollow needle with a t-shaped handle that is pushed into the bone for the purpose of collecting bone marrow aspiration and core biopsy samples.

Sponsors

Vidacare Corporation
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adults over the age of 18 * Patients that require core biopsy alone, or core biopsy and bone marrow aspiration

Exclusion criteria

* Imprisoned * Pregnant * Cognitively impaired * Requiring english language translation other than Spanish * Patients with one or more conditions precluding bone marrow core biopsy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Subject Reported Level of Pain During ProcedureDay 1 during the needle insertionSubjects were asked to rate the level of pain they experienced during the procedure for needle insertion, following penetration of the cortex. A 0 to 10 pain scale was used where 0=no pain and 10= worst possible pain.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time Necessary to Perform the Bone Marrow ProcedureDay 1 needle insertion through needle removalThe time necessary to perform the procedure was measured as follows: Time started once the needle and skin came into contact and time stopped once the sample was collected and the needle was removed from the patient.

Countries

Spain, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Adult patients 18 years of age requiring bone marrow aspiration and biopsy as part of routine care were considered eligible for the study.

Pre-assignment details

No pre-assisgnment details.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Manual Bone Marrow Sampling Device
Hollow needle with a t-shaped handle manually pushed into the bone for the purpose of bone marrow aspiration and core biopsy collection.
26
OnControl Bone Marrow System
Battery powered device used for insertion of a single lumen catheter into the intraosseous space of the adult iliac crest.
24
Total50

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicManual Bone Marrow Sampling DeviceOnControl Bone Marrow SystemTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
10 Participants6 Participants16 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
16 Participants18 Participants34 Participants
Age, Continuous59 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17
53 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19
56.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18
Region of Enrollment
Spain
14 participants6 participants20 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
12 participants18 participants30 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
12 Participants9 Participants21 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
14 Participants15 Participants29 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 260 / 24
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 260 / 24

Outcome results

Primary

Subject Reported Level of Pain During Procedure

Subjects were asked to rate the level of pain they experienced during the procedure for needle insertion, following penetration of the cortex. A 0 to 10 pain scale was used where 0=no pain and 10= worst possible pain.

Time frame: Day 1 during the needle insertion

Population: as per protocol, 50 patients were enrolled in the study and randomized to the manual bone marrow sampling device or the battery powered device.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Manual bone marrow sampling deviceSubject Reported Level of Pain During Procedure3.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3
OnControl Bone Marrow SystemSubject Reported Level of Pain During Procedure3.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.2
Secondary

Time Necessary to Perform the Bone Marrow Procedure

The time necessary to perform the procedure was measured as follows: Time started once the needle and skin came into contact and time stopped once the sample was collected and the needle was removed from the patient.

Time frame: Day 1 needle insertion through needle removal

Population: Per protocol, 50 patients were enrolled in the study and randomized to the manual bone marrow sampling device or the battery powered device.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Manual bone marrow sampling deviceTime Necessary to Perform the Bone Marrow Procedure224.1 secondsStandard Deviation 79
OnControl Bone Marrow SystemTime Necessary to Perform the Bone Marrow Procedure100.0 secondsStandard Deviation 72.8

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026