Skip to content

Clinical Trial Comparing Two Protocols Using Intravenous (IV) Hydromorphone

Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Two Protocols Using IV Hydromorphone

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01311895
Enrollment
350
Registered
2011-03-10
Start date
2011-01-31
Completion date
2011-11-30
Last updated
2018-05-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Pain

Keywords

acute, pain, emergency department, hydromorphone

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to compare two opioid protocols (H2O and 1+1) for the treatment of acute severe pain in the emergency department. The investigators primary hypothesis is that the H2O protocol will be more efficacious than the 1+1 protocol in Emergency Department patients aged 21-64 years. The primary outcome is the proportion of patients in each arm who choose to forgo additional pain medication at 60 minutes.

Interventions

DRUGH2O

2 mg IV hydromorphone

DRUG1+1

1mg I hydromorphone followed by an optional 1 mg IV hydromorphone 15 minutes later if the patient answers yes to the question, Do you want more pain medication?

Sponsors

Montefiore Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Age greater than 21 years and less than 65 years: This is a study of non-elderly adult patients. In addition, patients aged 21 years and younger are automatically triaged to the Children's Emergency Department (ED). 2. Pain with onset within 7 days: Pain within seven days is the definition of acute pain that has been used in ED literature. 3. ED attending physician's judgment that patient's pain warrants intravenous (IV) opioids

Exclusion criteria

1. Use of other opioids or tramadol within past 24 hours: to avoid introducing assembly bias related to recent opioid use, since this may affect baseline levels of pain and need for analgesics. 2. Prior adverse reaction to opioids. 3. Chronic pain syndrome: frequently recurrent or daily pain for at least 3 months results in modulation of pain perception which is thought to be due to down-regulation of pain receptors. Examples of chronic pain syndromes include sickle cell anemia, osteoarthritis, fibromyalgia, and peripheral neuropathies. 4. Alcohol intoxication: the presence of alcohol intoxication as judged by the treating physician may alter pain perception. 5. Systolic Blood Pressure \<90 mm Hg: Opioids can produce peripheral vasodilation that may result in orthostatic hypotension. 6. Oxygen saturation \< 95% on room air: For this study, oxygen saturation must be 95% or above on room air in order to be enrolled. 7. Use of monoamine oxidase (MAO) inhibitors in past 30 days: MAO inhibitors have been reported to intensify the effects of at least one opioid drug causing anxiety, confusion and significant respiratory depression or coma. 8. CO2 measurement greater than 46: In accordance with standard protocol, three subsets of patients will have their CO2 measured using a handheld capnometer prior to enrollment in the study. If the CO2 measurement is greater than 46 then the patient will be excluded from the study. The 3 subsets are as follows: * All patients who have a history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) * All patients who report a history of asthma together with greater than a 20 pack-year smoking history * All patients reporting less than a 20 pack-year smoking history who are having an asthma exacerbation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Patients With Satisfactory Pain Management at 60 Minutes60 minutesThe primary outcome is the proportion of patients in each arm who choose to forgo additional pain medication at 60 minutes. This is defined as the number of patients who declined additional pain medication at 60 minutes.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Change in Pain Intensity From Baseline to 60 Minutes60 minutesPain intensity is measured in numerical rating scale (NRS) units from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable). The change here represents the NRS score given by the patients at 60 minutes subtracted from the score at baseline, before treatment in the Emergency Department.
Number of Patients Who Reported no Pain or Mild Pain at 60 Minutes60 minutes

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
H2O (2 mg IV Hydromorphone)
2 mg IV hydromorphone H2O: 2 mg IV hydromorphone
166
1+1 (1 mg IV Hydromorphone + Optional 1 mg IV Hydromorphone)
1 mg IV hydromorphone followed by an additional 1 mg IV hydromorphone 15 minutes later if the patient answers yes to the following question: Do you want more pain medication? 1+1: 1mg I hydromorphone followed by an optional 1 mg IV hydromorphone 15 minutes later if the patient answers yes to the question, Do you want more pain medication?
168
Total334

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotal1+1 (1 mg IV Hydromorphone + Optional 1 mg IV Hydromorphone)H2O (2 mg IV Hydromorphone)
Age, Continuous43 years42 years44 years
Location of pain
Abdomen
228 Participants112 Participants116 Participants
Location of pain
Other
106 Participants56 Participants50 Participants
Nauseated or vomited before receiving opioids in the Emergency Department (ED)
No
121 Participants63 Participants58 Participants
Nauseated or vomited before receiving opioids in the Emergency Department (ED)
Yes
213 Participants105 Participants108 Participants
Pain intensity
10
190 Participants92 Participants98 Participants
Pain intensity
3-7
54 Participants26 Participants28 Participants
Pain intensity
8
52 Participants28 Participants24 Participants
Pain intensity
9
38 Participants22 Participants16 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black
92 Participants44 Participants48 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic
225 Participants116 Participants109 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
4 Participants3 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
13 Participants5 Participants8 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
334 Participants168 Participants166 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
210 Participants107 Participants103 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
124 Participants61 Participants63 Participants
Weight184 lbs186 lbs180 lbs

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 1660 / 168
other
Total, other adverse events
56 / 16653 / 168
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 1660 / 168

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Patients With Satisfactory Pain Management at 60 Minutes

The primary outcome is the proportion of patients in each arm who choose to forgo additional pain medication at 60 minutes. This is defined as the number of patients who declined additional pain medication at 60 minutes.

Time frame: 60 minutes

Population: The discrepancy between the number of patients enrolled and randomized and those included in analysis is due to the following.~H2O group: never given IV opioids (2), received ketorolac or additional opioids within the 60 min (7).~1+1 group: missing data (3), didn't receive 2nd dose within 60 min (2), received additional opioids within 60 min (2)

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
H2O (2 mg IV Hydromorphone)Number of Patients With Satisfactory Pain Management at 60 Minutes112 Participants
1+1 (1 mg IV Hydromorphone + Optional 1 mg IV Hydromorphone)Number of Patients With Satisfactory Pain Management at 60 Minutes113 Participants
Secondary

Mean Change in Pain Intensity From Baseline to 60 Minutes

Pain intensity is measured in numerical rating scale (NRS) units from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable). The change here represents the NRS score given by the patients at 60 minutes subtracted from the score at baseline, before treatment in the Emergency Department.

Time frame: 60 minutes

Population: The discrepancy between the number of patients enrolled and randomized and those included in analysis is due to the following.~H2O group: never given IV opioids (2), received ketorolac or additional opioids within the 60 min (7).~1+1 group: missing data (3), didn't receive 2nd dose within 60 min (2), received additional opioids within 60 min (2)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
H2O (2 mg IV Hydromorphone)Mean Change in Pain Intensity From Baseline to 60 Minutes6.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.1
1+1 (1 mg IV Hydromorphone + Optional 1 mg IV Hydromorphone)Mean Change in Pain Intensity From Baseline to 60 Minutes5.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3
Secondary

Number of Patients Who Reported no Pain or Mild Pain at 60 Minutes

Time frame: 60 minutes

Population: The discrepancy between the number of patients enrolled and randomized and those included in analysis is due to the following.~H2O group: never given IV opioids (2), received ketorolac or additional opioids within the 60 min (7).~1+1 group: missing data (3), didn't receive 2nd dose within 60 min (2), received additional opioids within 60 min (2)

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
H2O (2 mg IV Hydromorphone)Number of Patients Who Reported no Pain or Mild Pain at 60 Minutes112 Participants
1+1 (1 mg IV Hydromorphone + Optional 1 mg IV Hydromorphone)Number of Patients Who Reported no Pain or Mild Pain at 60 Minutes112 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026