Skip to content

Effects of the Quantity of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation(rTMS) on the Recovery After Stroke

Effects of the Quantity of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on the Recovery of Upper Motor Function After Stroke: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01311271
Enrollment
2
Registered
2011-03-09
Start date
2011-01-31
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2015-05-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hemiplegia, Stroke

Keywords

Stroke, Cerebrovascular disease, hemiplegia, Transcranial magnetic stimulation, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, rTMS, rehabilitation, Upper Extremity

Brief summary

The aim of this multicentric double blind study (randomized study) is to demonstrate the relationship between the amount of rTMS and the efficacy in the treatment of upper extremity motor deficits of stroke patients.

Detailed description

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) can modulate excitability of the brain via non-invasive methods. In that sense, rTMS has been used to treat a variety of symptoms of stroke during last two decades. Especially, improvement of upper extremity function has been proved by many studies. However, it remains uncertain about the optimum amount of rTMS. The aim of this multicentric double blind study (randomized study) is to demonstrate the relationship between the amount of rTMS and the efficacy in the treatment of upper extremity motor deficits of stroke patients. Fifty-seven patients will be included with written consent. After randomization, the subject will receive 3 different amount of treatment rTMS-rTMS, Sham-rTMS, Sham-Sham) in double blind methods.

Interventions

DEVICErepetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS)

1 Hz frequency, 15 minutes, intensity of 90% resting motor threshold, with one session a day, * Real: unaffected M1 hotspot * Sham: coil perpendicular to scalp

Sponsors

Asan Medical Center
CollaboratorOTHER
Gyeongsang National University Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Hanyang University
CollaboratorOTHER
Seoul National University Boramae Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* single mono-hemispheric ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke * 1st onset stroke patient * Upper extremity functional deficit attributable to acute stroke * A stage of at least 3 on brunnström pre-treatment * Written signed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Multiple lesion * Bilateral cortical lesion and motor problems * Cerebellar, or brainstem lesions * History of more than one stroke * Uncontrolled medical problems, such as: cardiopulmonary disease, severe rheumatoid arthritis, active joint deformity of arthritic origin, active cancer, or renal disease; * Increased intracranial pressure * History of seizure confirmed by interview and medical chart review * Any individual who is on medication which is known to lower seizure threshold * Other conditions that increase the risk of side effects due to rTMS procedures: a metal plate or metal object in the skull or eye, intracardiac line, increased intracranial pressure, cardiac pacemaker, implanted medication pump, tricyclic antidepressants, neuroleptics, history of seizure in the immediate family * An age of less than 20 years old * Any current actively treated medical or surgical condition or neurological or psychiatric illness other than stroke * Complications that would prevent participation in the intervention, such as severe pain and severe spasticity * Inability to cooperate outcome measure-related task * Severe language disturbances * Serious cognitive deficits * Non-vascular cause for the neurological symptoms other central nervous system * Disorder or peripheral neuropathy of the upper extremity * Taking medication which interrupt brain activity * Women who are pregnant

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Change in the Fugl-Meyer Assessment scale (upper extremity)Baseline, weekly during treatment, at 4-week follow-up,and at 12-week follow-up

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Change in grip strength, lateral pinch force, tip pinch force, Purdue pegboard test, K-MBI, mRS,and brunnström stageBaseline, weekly during treatment, at 4-week follow-up,and at 12-week follow-up

Countries

South Korea

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026