Skip to content

Cabazitaxel at 20 mg/m² Compared to 25 mg/m² With Prednisone for the Treatment of Metastatic Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer

Randomized, Open Label Multi-Center Study Comparing Cabazitaxel at 20 mg/m² and at 25 mg/m² Every 3 Weeks in Combination With Prednisone for the Treatment of Metastatic Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer Previously Treated With a Docetaxel-Containing Regimen

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01308580
Acronym
PROSELICA
Enrollment
1200
Registered
2011-03-04
Start date
2011-04-30
Completion date
2015-08-31
Last updated
2017-04-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Prostate Cancer

Brief summary

Primary Objective: \- To demonstrate the non inferiority in term of overall survival (OS) of Cabazitaxel 20 mg/m² (Arm A) versus Cabazitaxel 25 mg/m² (Arm B) in combination with prednisone in participants with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) previously treated with a docetaxel-containing regimen. Secondary Objectives: * To evaluate safety in the 2 treatment arms and to assess if Cabazitaxel 20 mg/m² was better tolerated than Cabazitaxel 25 mg/m². * To compare efficacy of Cabazitaxel at 20 mg/m² and 25 mg/m² for: * Progression Free Survival (PFS) defined as the first occurrence of any of the following events: tumor progression per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST), prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression, pain progression or death due to any cause; * PSA Progression; * Pain progression; * Tumor response in participants with measurable disease (RECIST 1.1); * PSA response; * Pain response in participants with stable pain at baseline. * To compare Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL). * To assess the pharmacokinetics and pharmacogenomics of Cabazitaxel.

Detailed description

Participants were treated until DP, unacceptable toxicity, participant's refusal of further study treatment or for a maximum of 10 cycles. All participants were followed when on study treatment and after completion of study treatment during follow up period until death or the study cutoff date, whichever came first.

Interventions

Pharmaceutical form: Concentrate and solvent for solution for infusion Route of administration: Intravenous

DRUGPrednisone (or Prednisolone)

Pharmaceutical form: Tablet Route of administration: Oral

Sponsors

Sanofi
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

: I 01. Diagnosis of histologically or cytologically proven prostate adenocarcinoma, that was resistant to hormone therapy and previously treated with a docetaxel-containing regimen. I 02. Participant must had either measurable or non-measurable disease. I 03. Received prior castration by orchiectomy and/or Luteinizing Hormone-Releasing Hormone (LH-RH) agonist with or without antiandrogen, antiandrogen withdrawal, monotherapy with estramustine, or other hormonal agents. I 04. Life expectancy \> 6 months. I 05. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) 0 - 2 (i.e, participant must be ambulatory, capable of all self-care, and up and about more than 50% of waking hours). I 06. Age ≥18 years (or country's legal age of majority if the legal age was \> 18 years).

Exclusion criteria

E 01. Previous treatment with mitoxantrone or cabazitaxel. E 02. Prior isotope therapy or radiotherapy to ≥30% of bone marrow. In case of prior isotope therapy 12 weeks must had elapsed prior to first study drug administration. E 03. Adverse events (excluding alopecia and those listed in the specific

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall Survival (OS)From baseline up to death due to any cause or study cut-off date, whichever was earlier (maximum duration: 48 months)OS was defined as the time interval from the date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause. In absence of confirmation of death, survival time was censored at the earlier of the last date the participant was known to be alive or the study cut-off date. The cut-off date for the final analysis of OS was the date when the 988th death had been observed. Analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier method.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to Tumor ProgressionFrom baseline up to tumor progression or death due to any cause or study cut-off date, whichever was earlier (maximum duration: 48 months)Time to Tumor progression was defined as the first occurrence of radiological tumor progression according to RECIST 1.1. Radiological tumor progression was defined at least a 20% increase in sum of diameters of target lesions (sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of ≥5 mm) taking as reference the smallest sum while on study, appearance of one or more new lesions, or unequivocal progression of existing non target-lesions. Analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier method.
Percentage of Participants With Overall Objective Tumor ResponseFrom baseline up to DP or death due to any cause or study cut-off date, whichever was earlier (maximum duration: 48 months)Overall objective tumor response was defined as either a partial response (PR) or complete response (CR) according to the RECIST 1.1 criteria, as assessed by the investigator. CR was defined as disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and normalization of tumor marker level. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must had reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters.
Time to PSA ProgressionFrom baseline up to PSA progression or death due to any cause or study cut-off date, whichever was earlier (maximum duration: 48 months)Time to PSA progression was time interval between randomization & first occurrence of PSA progression. PSA progression defined as: 1) PSA responders (\>50% decline from baseline PSA ≥10 ng/mL): increase of ≥25% (≥2 ng/mL) over nadir value, confirmed by second PSA ≥3 weeks later; 2) PSA non-responders (did not achieve \>50% decline from baseline PSA ≥10 ng/mL): increase of ≥25% (≥2 ng/mL) over baseline value, confirmed by second PSA ≥3 weeks later; 3) In participants not eligible for PSA response (baseline PSA \<10 ng/mL): (a) participants with baseline PSA \>0 ng/mL & \<10 ng/mL: increase in PSA by 25% (≥2 ng/mL) above baseline level, confirmed by second PSA value ≥3 weeks apart; (b) participants with baseline value=0 ng/mL: post-baseline PSA value ≥2 ng/mL. Note (for 1-3): Rise in PSA in first 12 weeks was progression only if met definition above and was associated with other sign of DP or if it continued beyond 12 weeks. Analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier method.
Percentage of Participants With PSA ResponseFrom baseline up to PSA progression or death due to any cause or study cut-off date, whichever was earlier (maximum duration: 48 months)PSA response was defined as ≥50% decrease from baseline in serum PSA levels, confirmed by a second PSA value at least 3 weeks later in participants with baseline PSA value ≥10 ng/mL.
Time to Pain ProgressionFrom baseline until DP, start of another anti-cancer therapy, death or study cut-off date (maximum duration: 48 months)Pain Progression was defined as an increase of ≥1 point in the median PPI from its nadir confirmed by a second assessment at least 3 weeks later or ≥25 % increase in the mean AS compared with the baseline score confirmed by a second assessment at least 3 weeks later or requirement for local palliative radiotherapy. PPI was rated by participant in a diary using a scale of 0=no pain, 1=mild, 2=discomforting, 3=distressing, 4=horrible 5=excruciating. Analgesic use was recorded by the participant in a diary. AS was calculated from the analgesic use data based on a table of analgesic medications, with non-narcotic medications assigned a value of 1 point and narcotic medications assigned a value of 4 points. Analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier method.
Percentage of Participants With Pain ResponseFrom baseline until DP, start of another anti-cancer therapy, death or study cut-off date (maximum duration: 48 months)Pain response was defined as either a ≥2-point decrease from baseline median PPI score without increase in AS, or a ≥50% decrease from baseline mean AS without increase in the PPI score, maintained for 2 consecutive evaluations at least 3 weeks apart. Increases in pain during the first 12 weeks were ignored in determining pain response.
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P):Trial Outcome Index (TOI) as a Measure of Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL)Baseline, Day 1 of each Cycle 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10 (each cycle 21-day); post-treatment follow up 1 (up to 12 weeks)FACT-P is a 39-item participant questionnaire that measures the concerns of participants with prostate cancer. It consists of 5 sub-scales assessing physical well-being (7 items), social/family well-being (7 items), emotional well-being (6 items), functional well-being (7 items), and prostate-specific concerns (12 items). FACT-P TOI combines physical well-being, functional well-being, and prostate-specific concerns sub-scales for a total possible score range of 0 to 104, where higher values represent better HRQoL.
Change From Baseline in FACT-P:Total Score as a Measure of HRQoLBaseline, Day 1 of each Cycle 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10 (each cycle 21-day); post-treatment follow up 1 (up to 12 weeks)FACT-P is a 39-item participant questionnaire that measures the concerns of participants with prostate cancer. It consists of 5 sub-scales assessing physical well-being (7 items), social/family well-being (7 items), emotional well-being (6 items), functional well-being (7 items), and prostate-specific concerns (12 items). FACT-P Total Score sums all 5 sub-scales to give a score in the range of 0 to 156, where higher values represent better HRQoL.
Progression Free Survival (PFS)From baseline up to tumor progression, PSA progression, pain progression, death due to any cause or study cut-off date, whichever was earlier (maximum duration: 48 months)PFS was evaluated from date of randomization to date of first documentation of any of the events: 1) Radiological tumor progression: as per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1: at least a 20% increase in sum of diameters of target lesions (sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of ≥5 mm) taking as reference the smallest sum while on study, appearance of one or more new lesions, or unequivocal progression of existing non target lesions, 2) Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) progression: ≥25% increase over baseline/nadir value if baseline PSA ≥10 ng/mL; or 25% increase above the baseline level if baseline PSA \>0 ng/mL & \<10 ng/mL; or post-baseline value of \>=2 ng/mL, if baseline PSA=0 ng/mL, 3) Pain progression: increase of ≥1 point in median Present Pain Intensity (PPI) from nadir or ≥25% increase in mean analgesic score (AS) from baseline score or requirement of local palliative radiotherapy, 4) Death. Analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier method.
Time to Definitive Deterioration of Score by 10% From Baseline on FACT-P Sub-ScalesFrom baseline until DP, start of another anti-cancer therapy, death or study cut-off date (maximum duration: 48 months)The time to definitive deterioration (10% decrease in score from baseline) was assessed for the individual sub-scales (Physical Well-Being; Social/Family Well-Being; Emotional Well-Being; Functional Well-Being; Prostate-Specific Concerns). Analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier method.
Time to Definitive Deterioration of ECOG PS Score From BaselineFrom baseline until death or study cut-off date (maximum duration: 48 months)The ECOG PS was used to evaluate participant's DP and the effect of the disease on the participant's activities of daily living. It ranges on the scale from 0-5 (0= normal activity; 1= symptoms but ambulatory; 2= in bed for \< 50 % of the time; 3= in bed for \> 50% of the time; 4= 100% bedridden; 5= dead). Time to definitive deterioration in ECOG PS score from baseline was defined as a change from 0, 1 to ≥2, or from 2 to ≥3. Analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier method.
Time to Definitive Weight Loss by 5% and 10% From BaselineFrom baseline until death or study cut-off date (maximum duration: 48 months)Time to definitive weight loss was defined as the time to first occurrence of ≥5% or ≥10% decrease in body weight from baseline. Analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier method.
Time to First Definitive Consumption of Narcotic MedicationFrom baseline until DP, start of another anti-cancer therapy, death or study cut-off date (maximum duration: 48 months)Concomitant medications used were recorded for all participants, and time of first definitive consumption of narcotic medication (if it occurred) was determined. This measure summarizes the time from baseline to first definitive consumption of narcotic medication. Analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier method.
Percentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)From first administration of study treatment until 30 days after the last administration of study treatment (Maximum duration: 48 months)Any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received investigational medicinal product (IMP) was considered an adverse event (AE) without regard to possibility of causal relationship with this treatment. TEAEs: AEs that developed or worsened or became serious during on-treatment period. On-treatment period: The time from the first dose of treatment to 30 days after the last dose of treatment (either Cabazitaxel or Prednisone). A serious adverse event: Any untoward medical occurrence that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death, life-threatening, required initial or prolonged in-patient hospitalization, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect, or considered as medically important event. Any TEAE included participants with both serious and non-serious AEs. National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria (NCI-CTCAE) version 4.03 (Grade 3 \[severe\] and Grade 4 \[life-threatening\]) was used in this study to grade clinical AEs.
Plasma Clearance (CL) for CabazitaxelDay 1 of Cycle 1: 5 minutes before the end of infusion (EOI), 15 minutes, 1 to 4 hour, 6 to 24 hours, 48 to 168 hour after EOIBlood samples for pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis were obtained from a subset of the study participants (approximately 150 participants/group, by protocol) according to a sparse sampling strategy.
Plasma Steady State Volume of Distribution (Vss) for CabazitaxelDay 1 of Cycle 1: 5 minutes before the EOI, 15 minutes, 1 to 4 hour, 6 to 24 hours, 48 to 168 hour after EOIBlood samples for PK analysis were obtained from a subset of the study participants (approximately 150 participants/group, by protocol) according to a sparse sampling strategy.
Percentage of Participants With FACT-P Total Score ResponseFrom baseline until DP, start of another anti-cancer therapy, death or study cut-off date (maximum duration: 48 months)FACT-P is a 39-item participant questionnaire that measures the concerns of participants with prostate cancer. It consists of 5 sub-scales assessing physical well-being (7 items), social/family well-being (7 items), emotional well-being (6 items), functional well-being (7 items), and prostate-specific concerns (12 items). FACT-P Total Score sums all 5 sub-scales to give a score in the range of 0 to 156, where higher values represent better HRQoL. Responder of FACT-P was defined as at least one occurrence of 7-point improvement from baseline in FACT-P total score during treatment period.

Countries

Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Chile, France, Germany, Hungary, Netherlands, Peru, Poland, Romania, Russia, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Taiwan, Tunisia, Turkey (Türkiye), United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The study was conducted at 172 centers in 22 countries. A total of 1463 participants were screened between 19 April 2011 and 18 November 2013. Out of 1463 participants, 1200 participants were enrolled in this study and 263 were not eligible to join the study.

Pre-assignment details

Participants were randomized by Interactive Voice Response System (IVRS) in 1:1 ratio (Cabazitaxel 20 mg/m\^2: Cabazitaxel 25 mg/m\^2) and stratified according to Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) score (0 or 1 versus 2), measurability of disease (measurable versus non-measurable) and region.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Cabazitaxel 20 mg/m^2
Cabazitaxel 20 mg/m\^2 IV infusion over 1 hour on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle in combination with Prednisone (or Prednisolone) 10 mg orally daily until DP, unacceptable toxicity, participant's refusal of further study treatment or for a maximum of 10 cycles.
598
Cabazitaxel 25 mg/m^2
Cabazitaxel 25 mg/m\^2 IV infusion over 1 hour on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle in combination with Prednisone (or Prednisolone) 10 mg orally daily until DP, unacceptable toxicity, participant's refusal of further study treatment or for a maximum of 10 cycles.
602
Total1,200

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up127

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCabazitaxel 20 mg/m^2Cabazitaxel 25 mg/m^2Total
Age, Customized
65 to 74 years
296 participants295 participants591 participants
Age, Customized
<65 years
182 participants180 participants362 participants
Age, Customized
≥75 years
120 participants127 participants247 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
598 Participants602 Participants1200 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
450 / 580507 / 595
serious
Total, serious adverse events
177 / 580257 / 595

Outcome results

Primary

Overall Survival (OS)

OS was defined as the time interval from the date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause. In absence of confirmation of death, survival time was censored at the earlier of the last date the participant was known to be alive or the study cut-off date. The cut-off date for the final analysis of OS was the date when the 988th death had been observed. Analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier method.

Time frame: From baseline up to death due to any cause or study cut-off date, whichever was earlier (maximum duration: 48 months)

Population: Analysis was performed on Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population, which included all randomized participants.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Cabazitaxel 20 mg/m^2Overall Survival (OS)13.4 months
Cabazitaxel 25 mg/m^2Overall Survival (OS)14.5 months
Comparison: The hazard ratio for OS was estimated using the Cox proportional hazards regression model. The Cox proportional hazard model was adjusted by measurability of the disease at baseline, ECOG PS score at baseline, and region at the time of randomization. Cabazitaxel 20 mg/m\^2 relative to 25 mg/m\^2 dose group was considered non-inferior if the upper bound of 1-sided 98.89% confidence interval of hazard ratio (20 mg/m\^2 versus 25 mg/m\^2) was less than the non-inferiority margin of 1.214.
Comparison: The hazard ratio for OS was estimated using the Cox proportional hazards regression model. The Cox proportional hazard model was adjusted by measurability of the disease at baseline, ECOG PS score at baseline, and region at the time of randomization. Cabazitaxel 25 mg/m\^2 was considered to be superior to 20 mg/m\^2 dose if the lower bound of 1-sided 95% confidence interval of hazard ratio was greater than 1.
Secondary

Change From Baseline in FACT-P:Total Score as a Measure of HRQoL

FACT-P is a 39-item participant questionnaire that measures the concerns of participants with prostate cancer. It consists of 5 sub-scales assessing physical well-being (7 items), social/family well-being (7 items), emotional well-being (6 items), functional well-being (7 items), and prostate-specific concerns (12 items). FACT-P Total Score sums all 5 sub-scales to give a score in the range of 0 to 156, where higher values represent better HRQoL.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 1 of each Cycle 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10 (each cycle 21-day); post-treatment follow up 1 (up to 12 weeks)

Population: Analysis was performed on FACT-P population. Number of participants analyzed=participants with evaluable FACT-P Total Score for specified outcome measure. Here, 'n' signifies number of participants with available data for specified category.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Cabazitaxel 20 mg/m^2Change From Baseline in FACT-P:Total Score as a Measure of HRQoLChange from baseline at cycle 4 (n = 421, 415)2.94 units on a scale
Cabazitaxel 20 mg/m^2Change From Baseline in FACT-P:Total Score as a Measure of HRQoLChange from baseline at cycle 7 (n = 229, 267)2.62 units on a scale
Cabazitaxel 20 mg/m^2Change From Baseline in FACT-P:Total Score as a Measure of HRQoLChange from baseline at cycle 3 (n = 459, 452)4.39 units on a scale
Cabazitaxel 20 mg/m^2Change From Baseline in FACT-P:Total Score as a Measure of HRQoLChange from baseline at cycle 8 (n = 196, 226)1.35 units on a scale
Cabazitaxel 20 mg/m^2Change From Baseline in FACT-P:Total Score as a Measure of HRQoLChange from baseline at cycle 5 (n = 339, 365)1.79 units on a scale
Cabazitaxel 20 mg/m^2Change From Baseline in FACT-P:Total Score as a Measure of HRQoLChange from baseline at cycle 9 (n = 164, 172)1.1 units on a scale
Cabazitaxel 20 mg/m^2Change From Baseline in FACT-P:Total Score as a Measure of HRQoLChange from baseline at cycle 2 (n = 502, 492)5.39 units on a scale
Cabazitaxel 20 mg/m^2Change From Baseline in FACT-P:Total Score as a Measure of HRQoLChange from baseline at cycle 10 (n = 137, 141)0.02 units on a scale
Cabazitaxel 20 mg/m^2Change From Baseline in FACT-P:Total Score as a Measure of HRQoLChange from baseline at cycle 6 (n = 275, 320)2.57 units on a scale
Cabazitaxel 20 mg/m^2Change From Baseline in FACT-P:Total Score as a Measure of HRQoLChange from baseline at Follow-up 1 (n = 137, 153)-3.1 units on a scale
Cabazitaxel 20 mg/m^2Change From Baseline in FACT-P:Total Score as a Measure of HRQoLChange from baseline at cycle 1 (n =521, 495)5.6 units on a scale
Cabazitaxel 25 mg/m^2Change From Baseline in FACT-P:Total Score as a Measure of HRQoLChange from baseline at Follow-up 1 (n = 137, 153)-2.09 units on a scale
Cabazitaxel 25 mg/m^2Change From Baseline in FACT-P:Total Score as a Measure of HRQoLChange from baseline at cycle 1 (n =521, 495)5.75 units on a scale
Cabazitaxel 25 mg/m^2Change From Baseline in FACT-P:Total Score as a Measure of HRQoLChange from baseline at cycle 2 (n = 502, 492)6.23 units on a scale
Cabazitaxel 25 mg/m^2Change From Baseline in FACT-P:Total Score as a Measure of HRQoLChange from baseline at cycle 3 (n = 459, 452)6.09 units on a scale
Cabazitaxel 25 mg/m^2Change From Baseline in FACT-P:Total Score as a Measure of HRQoLChange from baseline at cycle 4 (n = 421, 415)4.2 units on a scale
Cabazitaxel 25 mg/m^2Change From Baseline in FACT-P:Total Score as a Measure of HRQoLChange from baseline at cycle 5 (n = 339, 365)3.33 units on a scale
Cabazitaxel 25 mg/m^2Change From Baseline in FACT-P:Total Score as a Measure of HRQoLChange from baseline at cycle 6 (n = 275, 320)2.35 units on a scale
Cabazitaxel 25 mg/m^2Change From Baseline in FACT-P:Total Score as a Measure of HRQoLChange from baseline at cycle 7 (n = 229, 267)2.72 units on a scale
Cabazitaxel 25 mg/m^2Change From Baseline in FACT-P:Total Score as a Measure of HRQoLChange from baseline at cycle 8 (n = 196, 226)1.98 units on a scale
Cabazitaxel 25 mg/m^2Change From Baseline in FACT-P:Total Score as a Measure of HRQoLChange from baseline at cycle 9 (n = 164, 172)1 units on a scale
Cabazitaxel 25 mg/m^2Change From Baseline in FACT-P:Total Score as a Measure of HRQoLChange from baseline at cycle 10 (n = 137, 141)1.33 units on a scale
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P):Trial Outcome Index (TOI) as a Measure of Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL)

FACT-P is a 39-item participant questionnaire that measures the concerns of participants with prostate cancer. It consists of 5 sub-scales assessing physical well-being (7 items), social/family well-being (7 items), emotional well-being (6 items), functional well-being (7 items), and prostate-specific concerns (12 items). FACT-P TOI combines physical well-being, functional well-being, and prostate-specific concerns sub-scales for a total possible score range of 0 to 104, where higher values represent better HRQoL.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 1 of each Cycle 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10 (each cycle 21-day); post-treatment follow up 1 (up to 12 weeks)

Population: FACT-P population included randomized participants who completed FACT-P questionnaire at baseline \& in at least one post-baseline assessment. Number of participants analyzed=participants with evaluable FACT-P TOI for specified outcome measure. Here, 'n' signifies number of participants with available data for specified category.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Cabazitaxel 20 mg/m^2Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P):Trial Outcome Index (TOI) as a Measure of Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL)Change from baseline at cycle 4 (n =420, 415)2.57 units on a scale
Cabazitaxel 20 mg/m^2Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P):Trial Outcome Index (TOI) as a Measure of Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL)Change from baseline at cycle 7 (n =225, 262)2.51 units on a scale
Cabazitaxel 20 mg/m^2Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P):Trial Outcome Index (TOI) as a Measure of Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL)Change from baseline at cycle 3 (n =456, 451)3.75 units on a scale
Cabazitaxel 20 mg/m^2Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P):Trial Outcome Index (TOI) as a Measure of Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL)Change from baseline at cycle 8 (n =196, 227)1.44 units on a scale
Cabazitaxel 20 mg/m^2Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P):Trial Outcome Index (TOI) as a Measure of Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL)Change from baseline at cycle 5 (n =339, 361)1.78 units on a scale
Cabazitaxel 20 mg/m^2Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P):Trial Outcome Index (TOI) as a Measure of Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL)Change from baseline at cycle 9 (n =165, 172)0.94 units on a scale
Cabazitaxel 20 mg/m^2Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P):Trial Outcome Index (TOI) as a Measure of Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL)Change from baseline at cycle 2 (n = 500, 494)4.4 units on a scale
Cabazitaxel 20 mg/m^2Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P):Trial Outcome Index (TOI) as a Measure of Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL)Change from baseline at cycle 10 (n =137, 141)0.02 units on a scale
Cabazitaxel 20 mg/m^2Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P):Trial Outcome Index (TOI) as a Measure of Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL)Change from baseline at cycle 6 (n =275, 318)2.57 units on a scale
Cabazitaxel 20 mg/m^2Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P):Trial Outcome Index (TOI) as a Measure of Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL)Change from baseline at Follow-up 1 (n =136, 152)-2.27 units on a scale
Cabazitaxel 20 mg/m^2Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P):Trial Outcome Index (TOI) as a Measure of Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL)Change from baseline at cycle 1 (n =521, 494)4.69 units on a scale
Cabazitaxel 25 mg/m^2Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P):Trial Outcome Index (TOI) as a Measure of Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL)Change from baseline at Follow-up 1 (n =136, 152)-1.16 units on a scale
Cabazitaxel 25 mg/m^2Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P):Trial Outcome Index (TOI) as a Measure of Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL)Change from baseline at cycle 1 (n =521, 494)5.08 units on a scale
Cabazitaxel 25 mg/m^2Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P):Trial Outcome Index (TOI) as a Measure of Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL)Change from baseline at cycle 2 (n = 500, 494)5.55 units on a scale
Cabazitaxel 25 mg/m^2Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P):Trial Outcome Index (TOI) as a Measure of Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL)Change from baseline at cycle 3 (n =456, 451)5.46 units on a scale
Cabazitaxel 25 mg/m^2Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P):Trial Outcome Index (TOI) as a Measure of Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL)Change from baseline at cycle 4 (n =420, 415)3.82 units on a scale
Cabazitaxel 25 mg/m^2Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P):Trial Outcome Index (TOI) as a Measure of Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL)Change from baseline at cycle 5 (n =339, 361)3.06 units on a scale
Cabazitaxel 25 mg/m^2Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P):Trial Outcome Index (TOI) as a Measure of Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL)Change from baseline at cycle 6 (n =275, 318)2.03 units on a scale
Cabazitaxel 25 mg/m^2Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P):Trial Outcome Index (TOI) as a Measure of Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL)Change from baseline at cycle 7 (n =225, 262)2.73 units on a scale
Cabazitaxel 25 mg/m^2Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P):Trial Outcome Index (TOI) as a Measure of Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL)Change from baseline at cycle 8 (n =196, 227)2.08 units on a scale
Cabazitaxel 25 mg/m^2Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P):Trial Outcome Index (TOI) as a Measure of Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL)Change from baseline at cycle 9 (n =165, 172)1.46 units on a scale
Cabazitaxel 25 mg/m^2Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P):Trial Outcome Index (TOI) as a Measure of Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL)Change from baseline at cycle 10 (n =137, 141)1.31 units on a scale
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With FACT-P Total Score Response

FACT-P is a 39-item participant questionnaire that measures the concerns of participants with prostate cancer. It consists of 5 sub-scales assessing physical well-being (7 items), social/family well-being (7 items), emotional well-being (6 items), functional well-being (7 items), and prostate-specific concerns (12 items). FACT-P Total Score sums all 5 sub-scales to give a score in the range of 0 to 156, where higher values represent better HRQoL. Responder of FACT-P was defined as at least one occurrence of 7-point improvement from baseline in FACT-P total score during treatment period.

Time frame: From baseline until DP, start of another anti-cancer therapy, death or study cut-off date (maximum duration: 48 months)

Population: Analysis was performed on FACT-P population. Number of participants analyzed= participants with evaluable FACT-P total score for specified outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cabazitaxel 20 mg/m^2Percentage of Participants With FACT-P Total Score Response57.2 percentage of participants
Cabazitaxel 25 mg/m^2Percentage of Participants With FACT-P Total Score Response59.4 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Overall Objective Tumor Response

Overall objective tumor response was defined as either a partial response (PR) or complete response (CR) according to the RECIST 1.1 criteria, as assessed by the investigator. CR was defined as disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and normalization of tumor marker level. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must had reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters.

Time frame: From baseline up to DP or death due to any cause or study cut-off date, whichever was earlier (maximum duration: 48 months)

Population: Analysis was performed on ITT population. Number of participants analyzed= participants evaluable for tumor response with measurable disease at baseline and at least one valid post-baseline value.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cabazitaxel 20 mg/m^2Percentage of Participants With Overall Objective Tumor Response18.5 percentage of participants
Cabazitaxel 25 mg/m^2Percentage of Participants With Overall Objective Tumor Response23.4 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Pain Response

Pain response was defined as either a ≥2-point decrease from baseline median PPI score without increase in AS, or a ≥50% decrease from baseline mean AS without increase in the PPI score, maintained for 2 consecutive evaluations at least 3 weeks apart. Increases in pain during the first 12 weeks were ignored in determining pain response.

Time frame: From baseline until DP, start of another anti-cancer therapy, death or study cut-off date (maximum duration: 48 months)

Population: Analysis was performed on ITT population. Number of participants analyzed= participants evaluable for pain response with pain score with median PPI ≥2 and/or mean AS ≥10 points at baseline and at least one valid post-baseline value.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cabazitaxel 20 mg/m^2Percentage of Participants With Pain Response34.7 percentage of participants
Cabazitaxel 25 mg/m^2Percentage of Participants With Pain Response37.3 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With PSA Response

PSA response was defined as ≥50% decrease from baseline in serum PSA levels, confirmed by a second PSA value at least 3 weeks later in participants with baseline PSA value ≥10 ng/mL.

Time frame: From baseline up to PSA progression or death due to any cause or study cut-off date, whichever was earlier (maximum duration: 48 months)

Population: Analysis was performed on ITT population. Number of participants analyzed= participants evaluable for PSA response with PSA value ≥10 ng/mL at baseline and at least one valid post-baseline value.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cabazitaxel 20 mg/m^2Percentage of Participants With PSA Response29.5 percentage of participants
Cabazitaxel 25 mg/m^2Percentage of Participants With PSA Response42.9 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

Any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received investigational medicinal product (IMP) was considered an adverse event (AE) without regard to possibility of causal relationship with this treatment. TEAEs: AEs that developed or worsened or became serious during on-treatment period. On-treatment period: The time from the first dose of treatment to 30 days after the last dose of treatment (either Cabazitaxel or Prednisone). A serious adverse event: Any untoward medical occurrence that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death, life-threatening, required initial or prolonged in-patient hospitalization, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect, or considered as medically important event. Any TEAE included participants with both serious and non-serious AEs. National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria (NCI-CTCAE) version 4.03 (Grade 3 \[severe\] and Grade 4 \[life-threatening\]) was used in this study to grade clinical AEs.

Time frame: From first administration of study treatment until 30 days after the last administration of study treatment (Maximum duration: 48 months)

Population: Safety population included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of the study drug during study treatment period.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Cabazitaxel 20 mg/m^2Percentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any TEAE leading to permanent discontinuation16.4 percentage of participants
Cabazitaxel 20 mg/m^2Percentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any Grade 3-4 TEAE39.7 percentage of participants
Cabazitaxel 20 mg/m^2Percentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any Serious TEAE30.5 percentage of participants
Cabazitaxel 20 mg/m^2Percentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Grade 3-4 TEAE excluding laboratory TEAE35.7 percentage of participants
Cabazitaxel 20 mg/m^2Percentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any Grade TEAE91.2 percentage of participants
Cabazitaxel 20 mg/m^2Percentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Grade 3-4 TEAE excluding DP TEAEs39.0 percentage of participants
Cabazitaxel 20 mg/m^2Percentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Grade 3-4 TEAE excluding laboratory and DP TEAEs35.0 percentage of participants
Cabazitaxel 25 mg/m^2Percentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Grade 3-4 TEAE excluding DP TEAEs53.9 percentage of participants
Cabazitaxel 25 mg/m^2Percentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Grade 3-4 TEAE excluding laboratory and DP TEAEs47.4 percentage of participants
Cabazitaxel 25 mg/m^2Percentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any Serious TEAE43.2 percentage of participants
Cabazitaxel 25 mg/m^2Percentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any TEAE leading to permanent discontinuation19.5 percentage of participants
Cabazitaxel 25 mg/m^2Percentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any Grade TEAE93.9 percentage of participants
Cabazitaxel 25 mg/m^2Percentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any Grade 3-4 TEAE54.5 percentage of participants
Cabazitaxel 25 mg/m^2Percentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Grade 3-4 TEAE excluding laboratory TEAE48.1 percentage of participants
Secondary

Plasma Clearance (CL) for Cabazitaxel

Blood samples for pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis were obtained from a subset of the study participants (approximately 150 participants/group, by protocol) according to a sparse sampling strategy.

Time frame: Day 1 of Cycle 1: 5 minutes before the end of infusion (EOI), 15 minutes, 1 to 4 hour, 6 to 24 hours, 48 to 168 hour after EOI

Population: Analysis was performed on PK population that included participants who had evaluable PK data. Number of participants analyzed= participants with PK assessment at specified time-points.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cabazitaxel 20 mg/m^2Plasma Clearance (CL) for Cabazitaxel44.832 Litre/hourStandard Deviation 15.075
Cabazitaxel 25 mg/m^2Plasma Clearance (CL) for Cabazitaxel49.662 Litre/hourStandard Deviation 17.613
Secondary

Plasma Steady State Volume of Distribution (Vss) for Cabazitaxel

Blood samples for PK analysis were obtained from a subset of the study participants (approximately 150 participants/group, by protocol) according to a sparse sampling strategy.

Time frame: Day 1 of Cycle 1: 5 minutes before the EOI, 15 minutes, 1 to 4 hour, 6 to 24 hours, 48 to 168 hour after EOI

Population: Analysis was performed on PK population. Number of participants analyzed= participants with PK assessment at specified time-points.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cabazitaxel 20 mg/m^2Plasma Steady State Volume of Distribution (Vss) for Cabazitaxel7381.46 litreStandard Deviation 4488.72
Cabazitaxel 25 mg/m^2Plasma Steady State Volume of Distribution (Vss) for Cabazitaxel7040.10 litreStandard Deviation 5133.12
Secondary

Progression Free Survival (PFS)

PFS was evaluated from date of randomization to date of first documentation of any of the events: 1) Radiological tumor progression: as per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1: at least a 20% increase in sum of diameters of target lesions (sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of ≥5 mm) taking as reference the smallest sum while on study, appearance of one or more new lesions, or unequivocal progression of existing non target lesions, 2) Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) progression: ≥25% increase over baseline/nadir value if baseline PSA ≥10 ng/mL; or 25% increase above the baseline level if baseline PSA \>0 ng/mL & \<10 ng/mL; or post-baseline value of \>=2 ng/mL, if baseline PSA=0 ng/mL, 3) Pain progression: increase of ≥1 point in median Present Pain Intensity (PPI) from nadir or ≥25% increase in mean analgesic score (AS) from baseline score or requirement of local palliative radiotherapy, 4) Death. Analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier method.

Time frame: From baseline up to tumor progression, PSA progression, pain progression, death due to any cause or study cut-off date, whichever was earlier (maximum duration: 48 months)

Population: Analysis was performed on ITT population.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Cabazitaxel 20 mg/m^2Progression Free Survival (PFS)2.9 months
Cabazitaxel 25 mg/m^2Progression Free Survival (PFS)3.5 months
Comparison: Hazard ratio was estimated using a Cox Proportional Hazards regression model. The Cox proportional hazard model was adjusted by measurability of the disease at baseline, ECOG PS score at baseline, and region at the time of randomization.95% CI: [0.974, 1.24]
Secondary

Time to Definitive Deterioration of ECOG PS Score From Baseline

The ECOG PS was used to evaluate participant's DP and the effect of the disease on the participant's activities of daily living. It ranges on the scale from 0-5 (0= normal activity; 1= symptoms but ambulatory; 2= in bed for \< 50 % of the time; 3= in bed for \> 50% of the time; 4= 100% bedridden; 5= dead). Time to definitive deterioration in ECOG PS score from baseline was defined as a change from 0, 1 to ≥2, or from 2 to ≥3. Analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier method.

Time frame: From baseline until death or study cut-off date (maximum duration: 48 months)

Population: Analysis was performed on ITT population.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Cabazitaxel 20 mg/m^2Time to Definitive Deterioration of ECOG PS Score From Baseline14.9 months
Cabazitaxel 25 mg/m^2Time to Definitive Deterioration of ECOG PS Score From Baseline14.1 months
Secondary

Time to Definitive Deterioration of Score by 10% From Baseline on FACT-P Sub-Scales

The time to definitive deterioration (10% decrease in score from baseline) was assessed for the individual sub-scales (Physical Well-Being; Social/Family Well-Being; Emotional Well-Being; Functional Well-Being; Prostate-Specific Concerns). Analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier method.

Time frame: From baseline until DP, start of another anti-cancer therapy, death or study cut-off date (maximum duration: 48 months)

Population: Analysis was performed on FACT-P population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Cabazitaxel 20 mg/m^2Time to Definitive Deterioration of Score by 10% From Baseline on FACT-P Sub-ScalesSocial/family well-being10.8 months
Cabazitaxel 20 mg/m^2Time to Definitive Deterioration of Score by 10% From Baseline on FACT-P Sub-ScalesFunctional well-being6.6 months
Cabazitaxel 20 mg/m^2Time to Definitive Deterioration of Score by 10% From Baseline on FACT-P Sub-ScalesEmotional well-being9.7 months
Cabazitaxel 20 mg/m^2Time to Definitive Deterioration of Score by 10% From Baseline on FACT-P Sub-ScalesProstate specific concern8.7 months
Cabazitaxel 20 mg/m^2Time to Definitive Deterioration of Score by 10% From Baseline on FACT-P Sub-ScalesPhysical well-being6.6 months
Cabazitaxel 25 mg/m^2Time to Definitive Deterioration of Score by 10% From Baseline on FACT-P Sub-ScalesProstate specific concern9.7 months
Cabazitaxel 25 mg/m^2Time to Definitive Deterioration of Score by 10% From Baseline on FACT-P Sub-ScalesPhysical well-being8.3 months
Cabazitaxel 25 mg/m^2Time to Definitive Deterioration of Score by 10% From Baseline on FACT-P Sub-ScalesSocial/family well-being12.4 months
Cabazitaxel 25 mg/m^2Time to Definitive Deterioration of Score by 10% From Baseline on FACT-P Sub-ScalesEmotional well-being9.9 months
Cabazitaxel 25 mg/m^2Time to Definitive Deterioration of Score by 10% From Baseline on FACT-P Sub-ScalesFunctional well-being6.7 months
Secondary

Time to Definitive Weight Loss by 5% and 10% From Baseline

Time to definitive weight loss was defined as the time to first occurrence of ≥5% or ≥10% decrease in body weight from baseline. Analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier method.

Time frame: From baseline until death or study cut-off date (maximum duration: 48 months)

Population: Analysis was performed on ITT population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Cabazitaxel 20 mg/m^2Time to Definitive Weight Loss by 5% and 10% From BaselineWeight Loss by 5%10.6 months
Cabazitaxel 20 mg/m^2Time to Definitive Weight Loss by 5% and 10% From BaselineWeight Loss by 10%NA months
Cabazitaxel 25 mg/m^2Time to Definitive Weight Loss by 5% and 10% From BaselineWeight Loss by 5%11.1 months
Cabazitaxel 25 mg/m^2Time to Definitive Weight Loss by 5% and 10% From BaselineWeight Loss by 10%20.3 months
Secondary

Time to First Definitive Consumption of Narcotic Medication

Concomitant medications used were recorded for all participants, and time of first definitive consumption of narcotic medication (if it occurred) was determined. This measure summarizes the time from baseline to first definitive consumption of narcotic medication. Analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier method.

Time frame: From baseline until DP, start of another anti-cancer therapy, death or study cut-off date (maximum duration: 48 months)

Population: Analysis was performed on ITT population.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Cabazitaxel 20 mg/m^2Time to First Definitive Consumption of Narcotic Medication2.2 months
Cabazitaxel 25 mg/m^2Time to First Definitive Consumption of Narcotic Medication0.8 months
Secondary

Time to Pain Progression

Pain Progression was defined as an increase of ≥1 point in the median PPI from its nadir confirmed by a second assessment at least 3 weeks later or ≥25 % increase in the mean AS compared with the baseline score confirmed by a second assessment at least 3 weeks later or requirement for local palliative radiotherapy. PPI was rated by participant in a diary using a scale of 0=no pain, 1=mild, 2=discomforting, 3=distressing, 4=horrible 5=excruciating. Analgesic use was recorded by the participant in a diary. AS was calculated from the analgesic use data based on a table of analgesic medications, with non-narcotic medications assigned a value of 1 point and narcotic medications assigned a value of 4 points. Analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier method.

Time frame: From baseline until DP, start of another anti-cancer therapy, death or study cut-off date (maximum duration: 48 months)

Population: Analysis was performed on ITT population.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Cabazitaxel 20 mg/m^2Time to Pain Progression6.2 months
Cabazitaxel 25 mg/m^2Time to Pain Progression6.4 months
Comparison: Hazard ratio is estimated using a Cox Proportional Hazards regression model. The Cox proportional hazard model was adjusted by measurability of the disease at baseline, ECOG PS score at baseline, and region at the time of randomization.95% CI: [0.874, 1.251]
Secondary

Time to PSA Progression

Time to PSA progression was time interval between randomization & first occurrence of PSA progression. PSA progression defined as: 1) PSA responders (\>50% decline from baseline PSA ≥10 ng/mL): increase of ≥25% (≥2 ng/mL) over nadir value, confirmed by second PSA ≥3 weeks later; 2) PSA non-responders (did not achieve \>50% decline from baseline PSA ≥10 ng/mL): increase of ≥25% (≥2 ng/mL) over baseline value, confirmed by second PSA ≥3 weeks later; 3) In participants not eligible for PSA response (baseline PSA \<10 ng/mL): (a) participants with baseline PSA \>0 ng/mL & \<10 ng/mL: increase in PSA by 25% (≥2 ng/mL) above baseline level, confirmed by second PSA value ≥3 weeks apart; (b) participants with baseline value=0 ng/mL: post-baseline PSA value ≥2 ng/mL. Note (for 1-3): Rise in PSA in first 12 weeks was progression only if met definition above and was associated with other sign of DP or if it continued beyond 12 weeks. Analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier method.

Time frame: From baseline up to PSA progression or death due to any cause or study cut-off date, whichever was earlier (maximum duration: 48 months)

Population: Analysis was performed on ITT population.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Cabazitaxel 20 mg/m^2Time to PSA Progression5.7 months
Cabazitaxel 25 mg/m^2Time to PSA Progression6.8 months
Comparison: Hazard ratio was estimated using a Cox Proportional Hazards regression model. The Cox proportional hazard model was adjusted by measurability of the disease at baseline, ECOG PS score at baseline, and region at the time of randomization.95% CI: [1.025, 1.393]
Secondary

Time to Tumor Progression

Time to Tumor progression was defined as the first occurrence of radiological tumor progression according to RECIST 1.1. Radiological tumor progression was defined at least a 20% increase in sum of diameters of target lesions (sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of ≥5 mm) taking as reference the smallest sum while on study, appearance of one or more new lesions, or unequivocal progression of existing non target-lesions. Analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier method.

Time frame: From baseline up to tumor progression or death due to any cause or study cut-off date, whichever was earlier (maximum duration: 48 months)

Population: Analysis was performed on ITT population.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Cabazitaxel 20 mg/m^2Time to Tumor Progression9.0 months
Cabazitaxel 25 mg/m^2Time to Tumor Progression9.3 months
Comparison: Hazard ratio was estimated using a Cox Proportional Hazards regression model. The Cox proportional hazard model was adjusted by measurability of the disease at baseline, ECOG PS score at baseline, and region at the time of randomization.95% CI: [0.902, 1.331]

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 7, 2026