Skip to content

Vanguard Knee Anterior Stabilized Versus Posterior Stabilized Bearing Study

A Comparative Clinical Evaluation of the Vanguard Knee System's Anterior Stabilized & Posterior Stabilized Tibial Bearings

Status
Withdrawn
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01308515
Acronym
VGASPS
Enrollment
0
Registered
2011-03-04
Start date
2010-09-30
Completion date
2010-09-30
Last updated
2017-06-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Degenerative Arthritis, Osteoarthritis

Keywords

knee, osteoarthritis, joint, replacement, knee surgery

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the performance of two FDA-cleared tibial bearings (replacement for cartilage in the knee) by collecting data on patients through 3 years of follow-up.

Interventions

DEVICEVanguard Knee System with AS Bearing

FDA cleared Tibial bearing that stabilizes the knee with an anterior lip, and is used with FDA cleared Vanguard CR (Cruciate Retaining) Femoral Component.

DEVICEVanguard Knee System with PS Bearing

FDA cleared Tibial bearing that stabilizes the knee with a post that articulates with the FDA cleared Vanguard PS(Posterior Stabilizing) Femoral Component.

Sponsors

Zimmer Biomet
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

are identical to the indications stated in the FDA approved labeling for the device 510(k) K023546, K033489, and K050222. These indications are stated below: * Painful and disabled knee joint resulting from osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, traumatic arthritis where one or more compartments are involved. * Correction of varus, valgus, or posttraumatic deformity. * Correction or revision of unsuccessful osteotomy, or arthrodesis. Patient selection factors to be considered include: * Need to obtain pain relief and improve function * Ability and willingness of the patient to follow instructions, including control of weight and activity level * A good nutritional state of the patient * The patient must have reached full skeletal maturity

Exclusion criteria

will be identical to the contraindications stated in the FDA approved labeling for the device 510(k) K023546, K033489, and K050222. These contraindications are stated below: -Absolute contraindications include: infection, sepsis, osteomyelitis, and failure of a previous joint replacement. Relative contraindications include: * Uncooperative patient or patient with neurologic disorders who are incapable of following directions * Osteoporosis, * Metabolic disorders which may impair bone formation * Osteomalacia * Distant foci of infections which may spread to the implant site, * Rapid joint destruction, marked bone loss or bone resorption apparent on roentgenogram, * Vascular insufficiency, muscular atrophy, neuromuscular disease, * Incomplete or deficient soft tissue surrounding the knee

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Objective Knee Score1 Year Post-opAverage objective knee score; includes a combination of range of motion and pain scores.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Knee Society Score3 YearsAverage total knee score. Includes the objective and functional aspects of the knee score.
Dislocation3 YearsRate of Dislocation as reported by patients in a complication.
Survivorship3 YearsReports surivival of implant.
Reports of Radiographic Loosening via Complication Form3 YearsA more specific survivorship element; will indicate rate of loosening if it occurs.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026