Skip to content

Massage in Treating Painful Shoulder

Comparison of the Effectiveness of Massage Based on the Tensegrity Rule and Classical Massage in Treating Painful Shoulder

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01307826
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2011-03-03
Start date
2008-01-31
Completion date
2010-09-30
Last updated
2011-03-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Frozen Shoulder, Pain, Shoulder Pain Syndrome

Keywords

massage, shoulder, pain, range of motion, restricted range of motion

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to compare classical massage and massage based on the tensegrity rule in treating people with painful shoulder.

Detailed description

The joint system of the shoulder girdle is exposed to frequent overloading, which can cause painful shoulder. The therapeutic methods applied in the treatment of painful shoulder syndrome include among others oral pharmacotherapy, joint injections, kinesitherapy, ultrasound, electrotherapy, laser. Manual therapy, chiropractic and surgery could also be used. Attempts have also been made to apply classical massage in treating painful shoulder, although it is not often used due to its low effectiveness.This study compares classical massage and massage based on the tensegrity rule which is not commonly known.

Interventions

OTHERmassage

session - 20 minutes. Before the massage, palpable evaluation of the selected anatomical structures was carried out - to determine which tissues have the greatest sensitivity and which motor organs show increased tension (by pressing the attachment). In all the examined patients, pain of the following muscle attachments were shown: * latissimus muscle of the back * major pectoral muscle * supraspinous and infraspinous muscles * teres minor muscle * serratus anterior muscle * deltoid muscle The decision which muscles and fascias have to be massaged was made on the basis of the performed evaluation. In most cases the above mentioned tissues (together with other motor system organs which are structurally linked to it) were massaged to relax them. A palpable evaluation of the previously examined points was again performed during the final part, with particular attention paid to painful muscles, in order to analyze the effectiveness of the performed relaxation.

Sponsors

Wroclaw University of Health and Sport Sciences
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* painful shoulder syndrome

Exclusion criteria

* acute pain * previous bones fracture * bone relocations in the area of the shoulder girdle * neck spondylosis * hemiparesis * rheumatoid arthritis * any neurological symptoms

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
mobility measurementimmediately before the first massage session - Test 1, on the day the therapy ended - Test 2 - two weeks after therapy started, and one month after the last massage - Test 3To assess massage effectiveness, mobility measurements were conducted in each patient. Both were conducted three times

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ)immediately before the first massage session - Test 1, on the day the therapy ended - Test 2 - two weeks after therapy started, and one month after the last massage - Test 3To assess massage effectiveness, McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ) were conducted in each patient.

Countries

Poland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026