Skip to content

Safety and Efficacy of Cryoablation for Metastatic Lung Tumors

Evaluating Cryoablation of Metastatic Lung/Pleura Tumors in Patients - Safety and Efficacy

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01307501
Acronym
ECLIPSE
Enrollment
40
Registered
2011-03-03
Start date
2012-01-04
Completion date
2018-08-30
Last updated
2021-07-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Metastatic Lung Cancer

Keywords

Cryoablation, Cryotherapy, Cryosurgery, Metastatic, Lung, Pleura, Tumors

Brief summary

ECLIPSE will evaluate the safety and efficacy of cryoablation therapy used to treat tumors less than or equal to 3.5 centimeters (cm) in participants with pulmonary metastatic disease.

Detailed description

ECLIPSE is a treatment, Phase 1 multicenter, prospective, single-arm study with participants serving as their own control. This study is to enroll participants who will undergo cryoablation of at least 1 metastatic pulmonary tumor that is less than or equal to 3.5 cm. Participants will be followed for 5 years post their cryoablation procedure. Cryoablation is the process of destroying tissue by the application of extremely cold temperatures. Galil Medical Cryoablation Systems are used as a surgical tool in the fields of general surgery, dermatology (skin), neurology (nerves), chest surgery (including lung), Ears-Nose-Throat (ENT), gynecology, oncology (cancer), proctology (colon/rectal), and urology (kidney).

Interventions

DEVICECryoablation

Application of extremely cold temperatures to the identified tumor(s).

Sponsors

Boston Scientific Corporation
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

All participants received the same treatment.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Participant must be at least 18 years old. * Participant has signed a written informed consent. * Participant presents with Stage 4 pulmonary metastatic disease with metastatic disease previously confirmed by prior biopsy or confirmed on imaging with known primary disease. * Participant has up to 3 local metastases unilaterally targeted by cryoablation. Maximum of 5 total pulmonary tumors bilaterally. * Targeted tumor(s) defined as intra pulmonary or pleural with a maximum size of 3.5 cm. * The target tumor is determined (by CT/MRI) to be in a location where cryoablation is technically achievable based on the proximity of adjacent organs and structures. * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score of 0-2. * Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) score ≥60. * Platelet count \>50,000/cubed millimeters (mm\^3) within 60 days prior to study treatment. * International normalized ratio (INR) less than 1.5 within 60 days prior to study treatment. * Participant has a life expectancy of \>3 months. * Participant is clinically suitable for cryoablation procedure.

Exclusion criteria

* Participant's primary cancer is lung cancer. * Participant is unable to lie flat or has respiratory distress at rest. * Participant has uncontrolled coagulopathy or bleeding disorders. * Participant has had chemotherapy with neutropenia to levels as confirmed by absolute neutrophil count (ANC) of less than 1000 that produce increase risk for the cryoablation procedure. * Participant has a history of an allergic reaction to iodine injections or to shellfish. * Participant has evidence of active systemic, pulmonary, or pericardial infection. * Participant has a debilitating medical or psychiatric illness that would preclude giving informed consent or receiving optimal treatment or follow up. * Participant is currently participating in other experimental studies that could affect the primary endpoint.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Local Tumor Control for Each Index Tumor as Measured by Imaging at Month 60Baseline and Month 60Local tumor control was achieved if either the greatest trans-axial diameter of a treated tumor was ≤20% greater than at the pre-procedure assessment (per-tumor assessment) or if the sum of greatest trans-axial diameters of all treated tumors for a participant was ≤20% greater than the sum for the pre-procedure assessment of those tumors (per-participant assessment). Complete Response defined as tumor disappearance (scar) or \<25% of original size. If tumor/ablation zone had likely disappeared, the measurement was recorded as 0 mm; if tumor/ablation zone was present but too small to measure, the measurement was recorded as 5 mm. Partial Response defined as greater than 30% decrease in sum of the largest diameter of all targeted tumors. Stable Disease defined as less than 30% decrease in sum of the largest diameter of all targeted tumors. Local Failure defined as greater than 20% increase in the sum of the largest diameter of all targeted tumors. Worst response per participant was used.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall Disease-Specific Participant Survival Post-CryoablationUp to Month 60Disease-specific survival was analyzed as time in days from study cryoablation to participant death due to lung cancer. All deaths with documented lung disease progression were categorized as disease-specific deaths for this analysis. Participants who were alive were censored at the date of their last visit. Participants who died from causes other than lung cancer and did not have documented disease progression were censored at the time of death.
Time in Days to Disease Recurrence or Progression Following Study CryoablationBaseline (0 days), Week 1 (7 days), and Months 3 (90 days), 6 (180 days), 12 (365 days), 24 (730 days), 36 (1095 days), 48 (1460 days), and 60 (1825 days)Disease recurrence or progression will be determined locally by evidence of an increase in tumor size and/or contrast enhancement that met the definition of local tumor failure. Local tumor failure defined as a \>20% increase from baseline in the sum of the largest diameter of all targeted tumors. Participants without disease recurrence or progression were censored at the date of their last visit or their date of death due to any cause. The percentage of participants with disease recurrence or progression after the study cryoablation procedure at the specified number of days is presented.
Change From Baseline in ECOG Performance Status at Week 1 and Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60Baseline, Week 1 and Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60ECOG Performance Status defined as a set of criteria with corresponding scores used by the Investigator to assess how a participant's disease is progressing, assess how the disease affects the daily living abilities of the participant, and determine appropriate treatment and prognosis. ECOG Performance Status Scoring: 0=Fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease performance without restriction; 1=Restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory and able to carry out work of a light or sedentary nature (for example, light house work, office work); 2=Ambulatory and capable of all self-care but unable to carry out any work activities. Up and about more than 50% of waking hours; 3=Capable of only limited self-care, confined to bed or chair more than 50% of waking hours; 4=Completely disabled. Cannot carry on any self-care. Totally confined to bed or chair; 5=Dead.
Change From Baseline in Physical Function as Assessed by the KPS Scale at Week 1 and Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60Baseline, Week 1 and Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60The KPS Scale is a standard way of measuring the ability of cancer patients to perform ordinary tasks. The scores range from 0 to 100. A higher score means the participant is better able to carry out daily activities. KPS may be used to determine a participant's prognosis, to measure changes in a participant's ability to function.
Local Tumor Control for Each Index Tumor as Measured by Imaging at Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48Baseline and Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48Local tumor control was achieved if the greatest trans-axial diameter of a treated tumor was ≤20% greater than at the pre-procedure assessment (per-tumor assessment) or if the sum of the greatest trans-axial diameters of all treated tumors for a participant was ≤20% greater than the sum for the pre-procedure assessment of those tumors (per-participant assessment). Complete Response defined as tumor disappearance (scar) or \<25% of original size. If tumor/ablation zone had likely disappeared, the measurement was recorded as 0 mm; if tumor/ablation zone was present but too small to measure, the measurement was recorded as 5 mm. Partial Response defined as greater than 30% decrease in sum of the largest diameter of all targeted tumors. Stable Disease defined as less than 30% decrease in sum of the largest diameter of all targeted tumors. Local Failure defined as greater than 20% increase in the sum of the largest diameter of all targeted tumors. Worst response per participant was used.
Cryoablation Technical Success of the Study Cryoablation ProcedureUp to 60 monthsA technically successful treatment was defined by an ablation volume encompassing the tumor with at least a 5 mm margin. Technical success was calculated on a per tumor level as well as a participant level. To be considered a technical success on a participant level, all tumors treated during the baseline procedure were required to meet the technical success criteria (that is, an ablation volume encompassing the tumor with at least a 5 mm margin).
Number of Participants With an Intra- or Post-operative Adverse Event (AE), a Serious AE, or an Unanticipated Adverse Device Effect (UADE)Baseline up to 30 days post-cryoablationAn AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that develops or worsens in severity during the conduct of a clinical study. Serious AEs include death, a life-threatening AE, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, persistent or significant disability or incapacity, a congenital anomaly or birth defect, or an important medical event that jeopardized the participant and required medical intervention to prevent the previously listed serious outcomes. UADE was any serious adverse effect, any life-threatening problem or death caused by or associated with a device, if it was not previously identified in nature, severity, or degree of incidence in the application; or any other unanticipated serious problem associated with a device. The AEs that are presented were considered related to the cryoablation procedure. A summary of other non-serious AEs and all serious AEs, regardless of causality is located in Reported AE section.
Metastatic Disease Spread as Measured by ImagingMonths 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60Evidence of additional metastatic disease post cryoablation procedure as measured by imaging is presented.
Change From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60Baseline, Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60The SF-12 is a shortened version of the well-known SF-36. The SF-12 assesses eight domains (physical functioning, role limitations due to physical health problems, bodily pain, social functioning, general mental health, role limitations due to emotional problems, vitality and general health perception). Assessments were made by examining the change in the baseline scores to those reported post-operatively. The scores range from 0 to 100. A higher value indicates a better quality of life of the participant.

Countries

France, United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Cryoablation
Participants underwent a cryoablation procedure with the Galil Medical Cryoablation System according to the manufacturer's guidelines. Participant preparation, anesthesia, intra-operative monitoring, and postoperative management for the study cryoablation procedure were identical to those for standard cryoablation treatment routinely performed at the clinical centers that participated in this study and were at the discretion of the Investigators. No more than 3 tumors in 1 lung were treated in a single session, and no more than 5 total lung tumors (across both lungs) were treated during the study.
40
Total40

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyDeath20
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up1
Overall StudyStarting Hospice1
Overall StudyTreatment Failure1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCryoablation
Age, Continuous62.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.3
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status0.3 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.5
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
2 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
19 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
19 Participants
Physical Function as Assessed by the Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) Scale95.5 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.1
Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the Short Form-12 (SF-12) Generic Measure
Bodily Pain
77.3 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 26.8
Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the Short Form-12 (SF-12) Generic Measure
General Health Perception
63.9 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 23.3
Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the Short Form-12 (SF-12) Generic Measure
Mental Health
69.5 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.2
Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the Short Form-12 (SF-12) Generic Measure
Physical Functioning
71.2 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 34.9
Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the Short Form-12 (SF-12) Generic Measure
Role Emotional
78.4 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 21
Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the Short Form-12 (SF-12) Generic Measure
Role Physical
62.1 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 29.7
Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the Short Form-12 (SF-12) Generic Measure
Social Functioning
80.5 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 26.7
Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the Short Form-12 (SF-12) Generic Measure
Vitality
57.8 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 22.4
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
19 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
17 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
16 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
24 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
20 / 40
other
Total, other adverse events
32 / 40
serious
Total, serious adverse events
6 / 40

Outcome results

Primary

Local Tumor Control for Each Index Tumor as Measured by Imaging at Month 60

Local tumor control was achieved if either the greatest trans-axial diameter of a treated tumor was ≤20% greater than at the pre-procedure assessment (per-tumor assessment) or if the sum of greatest trans-axial diameters of all treated tumors for a participant was ≤20% greater than the sum for the pre-procedure assessment of those tumors (per-participant assessment). Complete Response defined as tumor disappearance (scar) or \<25% of original size. If tumor/ablation zone had likely disappeared, the measurement was recorded as 0 mm; if tumor/ablation zone was present but too small to measure, the measurement was recorded as 5 mm. Partial Response defined as greater than 30% decrease in sum of the largest diameter of all targeted tumors. Stable Disease defined as less than 30% decrease in sum of the largest diameter of all targeted tumors. Local Failure defined as greater than 20% increase in the sum of the largest diameter of all targeted tumors. Worst response per participant was used.

Time frame: Baseline and Month 60

Population: Participants for whom cryoablation via Galil Medical Cryoablation System was attempted or performed (ITT Population) with available data at the respective time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
CryoablationLocal Tumor Control for Each Index Tumor as Measured by Imaging at Month 60Local Control, Month 6080.0 percentage of tumors
CryoablationLocal Tumor Control for Each Index Tumor as Measured by Imaging at Month 60Complete Response, Month 6045.0 percentage of tumors
CryoablationLocal Tumor Control for Each Index Tumor as Measured by Imaging at Month 60Partial Response, Month 6015.0 percentage of tumors
CryoablationLocal Tumor Control for Each Index Tumor as Measured by Imaging at Month 60Stable Disease, Month 6020.0 percentage of tumors
CryoablationLocal Tumor Control for Each Index Tumor as Measured by Imaging at Month 60Local Failure, Month 6020.0 percentage of tumors
Secondary

Change From Baseline in ECOG Performance Status at Week 1 and Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60

ECOG Performance Status defined as a set of criteria with corresponding scores used by the Investigator to assess how a participant's disease is progressing, assess how the disease affects the daily living abilities of the participant, and determine appropriate treatment and prognosis. ECOG Performance Status Scoring: 0=Fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease performance without restriction; 1=Restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory and able to carry out work of a light or sedentary nature (for example, light house work, office work); 2=Ambulatory and capable of all self-care but unable to carry out any work activities. Up and about more than 50% of waking hours; 3=Capable of only limited self-care, confined to bed or chair more than 50% of waking hours; 4=Completely disabled. Cannot carry on any self-care. Totally confined to bed or chair; 5=Dead.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 1 and Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60

Population: Participants for whom cryoablation via Galil Medical Cryoablation System was attempted or performed (ITT Population) with available data at the respective time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CryoablationChange From Baseline in ECOG Performance Status at Week 1 and Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60Change at Week 10.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
CryoablationChange From Baseline in ECOG Performance Status at Week 1 and Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60Change at Month 10 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.4
CryoablationChange From Baseline in ECOG Performance Status at Week 1 and Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60Change at Month 30.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.4
CryoablationChange From Baseline in ECOG Performance Status at Week 1 and Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60Change at Month 60.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.4
CryoablationChange From Baseline in ECOG Performance Status at Week 1 and Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60Change at Month 120.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
CryoablationChange From Baseline in ECOG Performance Status at Week 1 and Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60Change at Month 240.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
CryoablationChange From Baseline in ECOG Performance Status at Week 1 and Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60Change at Month 36-0.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
CryoablationChange From Baseline in ECOG Performance Status at Week 1 and Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60Change at Month 480.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
CryoablationChange From Baseline in ECOG Performance Status at Week 1 and Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60Change at Month 600.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Physical Function as Assessed by the KPS Scale at Week 1 and Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60

The KPS Scale is a standard way of measuring the ability of cancer patients to perform ordinary tasks. The scores range from 0 to 100. A higher score means the participant is better able to carry out daily activities. KPS may be used to determine a participant's prognosis, to measure changes in a participant's ability to function.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 1 and Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60

Population: Participants for whom cryoablation via Galil Medical Cryoablation System was attempted or performed (ITT Population) with available data at the respective time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CryoablationChange From Baseline in Physical Function as Assessed by the KPS Scale at Week 1 and Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60Baseline95.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.1
CryoablationChange From Baseline in Physical Function as Assessed by the KPS Scale at Week 1 and Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60Change at Week 1-1.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.1
CryoablationChange From Baseline in Physical Function as Assessed by the KPS Scale at Week 1 and Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60Change at Month 1-0.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.3
CryoablationChange From Baseline in Physical Function as Assessed by the KPS Scale at Week 1 and Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60Change at Month 3-1.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.3
CryoablationChange From Baseline in Physical Function as Assessed by the KPS Scale at Week 1 and Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60Change at Month 60.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.2
CryoablationChange From Baseline in Physical Function as Assessed by the KPS Scale at Week 1 and Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60Change at Month 12-0.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.4
CryoablationChange From Baseline in Physical Function as Assessed by the KPS Scale at Week 1 and Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60Change at Month 244.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.3
CryoablationChange From Baseline in Physical Function as Assessed by the KPS Scale at Week 1 and Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60Change at Month 367.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.4
CryoablationChange From Baseline in Physical Function as Assessed by the KPS Scale at Week 1 and Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60Change at Month 485.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.5
CryoablationChange From Baseline in Physical Function as Assessed by the KPS Scale at Week 1 and Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60Change at Month 606.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.8
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60

The SF-12 is a shortened version of the well-known SF-36. The SF-12 assesses eight domains (physical functioning, role limitations due to physical health problems, bodily pain, social functioning, general mental health, role limitations due to emotional problems, vitality and general health perception). Assessments were made by examining the change in the baseline scores to those reported post-operatively. The scores range from 0 to 100. A higher value indicates a better quality of life of the participant.

Time frame: Baseline, Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60

Population: Participants for whom cryoablation via Galil Medical Cryoablation System was attempted or performed (ITT Population) with available data at the respective time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CryoablationChange From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60Physical Functioning, Change at Month 1-10.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.2
CryoablationChange From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60Physical Functioning, Change at Month 3-12.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.4
CryoablationChange From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60Physical Functioning, Change at Month 6-12.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 33
CryoablationChange From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60Physical Functioning, Change at Month 12-23.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 38
CryoablationChange From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60Physical Functioning, Change at Month 24-10.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 44.5
CryoablationChange From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60Physical Functioning, Change at Month 36-12.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 31.7
CryoablationChange From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60Physical Functioning, Change at Month 48-10.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 31.8
CryoablationChange From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60Physical Functioning, Change at Month 60-12.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 54.2
CryoablationChange From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60Role Physical, Change at Month 14.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.2
CryoablationChange From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60Role Physical, Change at Month 3-1.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 21
CryoablationChange From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60Role Physical, Change at Month 6-0.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.7
CryoablationChange From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60Role Physical, Change at Month 12-2.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.8
CryoablationChange From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60Role Physical, Change at Month 245.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.5
CryoablationChange From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60Role Physical, Change at Month 365.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.8
CryoablationChange From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60Role Physical, Change at Month 483.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 35.9
CryoablationChange From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60Role Physical, Change at Month 60-4.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.8
CryoablationChange From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60Bodily Pain, Change at Month 1-9.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.8
CryoablationChange From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60Bodily Pain, Change at Month 3-3.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.6
CryoablationChange From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60Bodily Pain, Change at Month 6-9.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.9
CryoablationChange From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60Bodily Pain, Change at Month 12-7.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.1
CryoablationChange From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60Bodily Pain, Change at Month 24-18.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 32.2
CryoablationChange From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60Bodily Pain, Change at Month 36-5.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 30.7
CryoablationChange From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60Bodily Pain, Change at Month 480 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.9
CryoablationChange From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60Bodily Pain, Change at Month 60-8.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 49.2
CryoablationChange From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60Social Functioning, Change at Month 1-8.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.1
CryoablationChange From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60Social Functioning, Change at Month 3-3.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.7
CryoablationChange From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60Social Functioning, Change at Month 6-4.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22
CryoablationChange From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60Social Functioning, Change at Month 12-11.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.1
CryoablationChange From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60Social Functioning, Change at Month 24-12.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 32.9
CryoablationChange From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60Social Functioning, Change at Month 36-2.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.9
CryoablationChange From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60Social Functioning, Change at Month 48-3.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 39.3
CryoablationChange From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60Social Functioning, Change at Month 60-12.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 37.9
CryoablationChange From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60Mental Health, Change at Month 11.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.3
CryoablationChange From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60Mental Health, Change at Month 30.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12
CryoablationChange From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60Mental Health, Change at Month 6-1.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.6
CryoablationChange From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60Mental Health, Change at Month 12-0.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.6
CryoablationChange From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60Mental Health, Change at Month 24-3.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17
CryoablationChange From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60Mental Health, Change at Month 363.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.6
CryoablationChange From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60Mental Health, Change at Month 488.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.4
CryoablationChange From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60Mental Health, Change at Month 600 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.7
CryoablationChange From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60Role Emotional, Change at Month 1-3.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.5
CryoablationChange From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60Role Emotional, Change at Month 3-11.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 23
CryoablationChange From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60Role Emotional, Change at Month 6-2.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.4
CryoablationChange From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60Role Emotional, Change at Month 12-3.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.1
CryoablationChange From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60Role Emotional, Change at Month 24-11.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.1
CryoablationChange From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60Role Emotional, Change at Month 36-11.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.9
CryoablationChange From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60Role Emotional, Change at Month 48-8.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.7
CryoablationChange From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60Role Emotional, Change at Month 60-22.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.7
CryoablationChange From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60Vitality, Change at Month 1-6.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.8
CryoablationChange From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60Vitality, Change at Month 3-9.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.8
CryoablationChange From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60Vitality, Change at Month 6-6.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.6
CryoablationChange From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60Vitality, Change at Month 12-10.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 24
CryoablationChange From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60Vitality, Change at Month 24-14.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.5
CryoablationChange From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60Vitality, Change at Month 36-2.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.5
CryoablationChange From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60Vitality, Change at Month 48-7.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.8
CryoablationChange From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60Vitality, Change at Month 60-4.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.2
CryoablationChange From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60General Health Perception, Change at Month 1-3.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.9
CryoablationChange From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60General Health Perception, Change at Month 32.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.1
CryoablationChange From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60General Health Perception, Change at Month 60 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.5
CryoablationChange From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60General Health Perception, Change at Month 12-5.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 31.4
CryoablationChange From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60General Health Perception, Change at Month 24-11.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.2
CryoablationChange From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60General Health Perception, Change at Month 36-14.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.1
CryoablationChange From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60General Health Perception, Change at Month 48-14.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.9
CryoablationChange From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60General Health Perception, Change at Month 60-22.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 33.6
Secondary

Cryoablation Technical Success of the Study Cryoablation Procedure

A technically successful treatment was defined by an ablation volume encompassing the tumor with at least a 5 mm margin. Technical success was calculated on a per tumor level as well as a participant level. To be considered a technical success on a participant level, all tumors treated during the baseline procedure were required to meet the technical success criteria (that is, an ablation volume encompassing the tumor with at least a 5 mm margin).

Time frame: Up to 60 months

Population: Participants for whom cryoablation via Galil Medical Cryoablation System was attempted or performed (ITT Population).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
CryoablationCryoablation Technical Success of the Study Cryoablation Procedure100 percentage of tumors
Secondary

Local Tumor Control for Each Index Tumor as Measured by Imaging at Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48

Local tumor control was achieved if the greatest trans-axial diameter of a treated tumor was ≤20% greater than at the pre-procedure assessment (per-tumor assessment) or if the sum of the greatest trans-axial diameters of all treated tumors for a participant was ≤20% greater than the sum for the pre-procedure assessment of those tumors (per-participant assessment). Complete Response defined as tumor disappearance (scar) or \<25% of original size. If tumor/ablation zone had likely disappeared, the measurement was recorded as 0 mm; if tumor/ablation zone was present but too small to measure, the measurement was recorded as 5 mm. Partial Response defined as greater than 30% decrease in sum of the largest diameter of all targeted tumors. Stable Disease defined as less than 30% decrease in sum of the largest diameter of all targeted tumors. Local Failure defined as greater than 20% increase in the sum of the largest diameter of all targeted tumors. Worst response per participant was used.

Time frame: Baseline and Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48

Population: Participants for whom cryoablation via Galil Medical Cryoablation System was attempted or performed (ITT Population) with available data at the respective time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
CryoablationLocal Tumor Control for Each Index Tumor as Measured by Imaging at Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48Stable Disease, Month 337.5 percentage of tumors
CryoablationLocal Tumor Control for Each Index Tumor as Measured by Imaging at Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48Local Control, Month 346.4 percentage of tumors
CryoablationLocal Tumor Control for Each Index Tumor as Measured by Imaging at Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48Local Control, Month 666.7 percentage of tumors
CryoablationLocal Tumor Control for Each Index Tumor as Measured by Imaging at Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48Local Control, Month 1280.4 percentage of tumors
CryoablationLocal Tumor Control for Each Index Tumor as Measured by Imaging at Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48Local Control, Month 2487.5 percentage of tumors
CryoablationLocal Tumor Control for Each Index Tumor as Measured by Imaging at Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48Local Control, Month 4890.9 percentage of tumors
CryoablationLocal Tumor Control for Each Index Tumor as Measured by Imaging at Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48Local Control, Month 3690.3 percentage of tumors
CryoablationLocal Tumor Control for Each Index Tumor as Measured by Imaging at Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48Complete Response, Month 35.4 percentage of tumors
CryoablationLocal Tumor Control for Each Index Tumor as Measured by Imaging at Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48Complete Response, Month 615.8 percentage of tumors
CryoablationLocal Tumor Control for Each Index Tumor as Measured by Imaging at Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48Complete Response, Month 1223.5 percentage of tumors
CryoablationLocal Tumor Control for Each Index Tumor as Measured by Imaging at Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48Complete Response, Month 2440.0 percentage of tumors
CryoablationLocal Tumor Control for Each Index Tumor as Measured by Imaging at Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48Complete Response, Month 3638.7 percentage of tumors
CryoablationLocal Tumor Control for Each Index Tumor as Measured by Imaging at Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48Complete Response, Month 4840.9 percentage of tumors
CryoablationLocal Tumor Control for Each Index Tumor as Measured by Imaging at Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48Partial Response, Month 33.6 percentage of tumors
CryoablationLocal Tumor Control for Each Index Tumor as Measured by Imaging at Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48Partial Response, Month 610.5 percentage of tumors
CryoablationLocal Tumor Control for Each Index Tumor as Measured by Imaging at Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48Partial Response, Month 1215.7 percentage of tumors
CryoablationLocal Tumor Control for Each Index Tumor as Measured by Imaging at Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48Partial Response, Month 2410.0 percentage of tumors
CryoablationLocal Tumor Control for Each Index Tumor as Measured by Imaging at Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48Partial Response, Month 3616.1 percentage of tumors
CryoablationLocal Tumor Control for Each Index Tumor as Measured by Imaging at Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48Partial Response, Month 4822.7 percentage of tumors
CryoablationLocal Tumor Control for Each Index Tumor as Measured by Imaging at Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48Stable Disease, Month 640.4 percentage of tumors
CryoablationLocal Tumor Control for Each Index Tumor as Measured by Imaging at Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48Stable Disease, Month 1241.2 percentage of tumors
CryoablationLocal Tumor Control for Each Index Tumor as Measured by Imaging at Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48Stable Disease, Month 2437.5 percentage of tumors
CryoablationLocal Tumor Control for Each Index Tumor as Measured by Imaging at Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48Stable Disease, Month 3635.5 percentage of tumors
CryoablationLocal Tumor Control for Each Index Tumor as Measured by Imaging at Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48Stable Disease, Month 4827.3 percentage of tumors
CryoablationLocal Tumor Control for Each Index Tumor as Measured by Imaging at Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48Local Failure, Month 353.6 percentage of tumors
CryoablationLocal Tumor Control for Each Index Tumor as Measured by Imaging at Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48Local Failure, Month 633.3 percentage of tumors
CryoablationLocal Tumor Control for Each Index Tumor as Measured by Imaging at Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48Local Failure, Month 1219.6 percentage of tumors
CryoablationLocal Tumor Control for Each Index Tumor as Measured by Imaging at Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48Local Failure, Month 2412.5 percentage of tumors
CryoablationLocal Tumor Control for Each Index Tumor as Measured by Imaging at Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48Local Failure, Month 369.7 percentage of tumors
CryoablationLocal Tumor Control for Each Index Tumor as Measured by Imaging at Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48Local Failure, Month 489.1 percentage of tumors
Secondary

Metastatic Disease Spread as Measured by Imaging

Evidence of additional metastatic disease post cryoablation procedure as measured by imaging is presented.

Time frame: Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60

Population: Participants for whom cryoablation via Galil Medical Cryoablation System was attempted or performed (ITT Population) with available data at the respective time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
CryoablationMetastatic Disease Spread as Measured by ImagingMonth 316 Participants
CryoablationMetastatic Disease Spread as Measured by ImagingMonth 614 Participants
CryoablationMetastatic Disease Spread as Measured by ImagingMonth 1214 Participants
CryoablationMetastatic Disease Spread as Measured by ImagingMonth 2410 Participants
CryoablationMetastatic Disease Spread as Measured by ImagingMonth 369 Participants
CryoablationMetastatic Disease Spread as Measured by ImagingMonth 487 Participants
CryoablationMetastatic Disease Spread as Measured by ImagingMonth 606 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With an Intra- or Post-operative Adverse Event (AE), a Serious AE, or an Unanticipated Adverse Device Effect (UADE)

An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that develops or worsens in severity during the conduct of a clinical study. Serious AEs include death, a life-threatening AE, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, persistent or significant disability or incapacity, a congenital anomaly or birth defect, or an important medical event that jeopardized the participant and required medical intervention to prevent the previously listed serious outcomes. UADE was any serious adverse effect, any life-threatening problem or death caused by or associated with a device, if it was not previously identified in nature, severity, or degree of incidence in the application; or any other unanticipated serious problem associated with a device. The AEs that are presented were considered related to the cryoablation procedure. A summary of other non-serious AEs and all serious AEs, regardless of causality is located in Reported AE section.

Time frame: Baseline up to 30 days post-cryoablation

Population: Participants for whom cryoablation via Galil Medical Cryoablation System was attempted or performed (ITT Population).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
CryoablationNumber of Participants With an Intra- or Post-operative Adverse Event (AE), a Serious AE, or an Unanticipated Adverse Device Effect (UADE)Intra-operative nonserious AE (NSAE)23 Participants
CryoablationNumber of Participants With an Intra- or Post-operative Adverse Event (AE), a Serious AE, or an Unanticipated Adverse Device Effect (UADE)Post-operative NSAE, prior to discharge9 Participants
CryoablationNumber of Participants With an Intra- or Post-operative Adverse Event (AE), a Serious AE, or an Unanticipated Adverse Device Effect (UADE)Post-operative NSAE within 30 days of procedure19 Participants
CryoablationNumber of Participants With an Intra- or Post-operative Adverse Event (AE), a Serious AE, or an Unanticipated Adverse Device Effect (UADE)Serious AE6 Participants
CryoablationNumber of Participants With an Intra- or Post-operative Adverse Event (AE), a Serious AE, or an Unanticipated Adverse Device Effect (UADE)UADE0 Participants
Secondary

Overall Disease-Specific Participant Survival Post-Cryoablation

Disease-specific survival was analyzed as time in days from study cryoablation to participant death due to lung cancer. All deaths with documented lung disease progression were categorized as disease-specific deaths for this analysis. Participants who were alive were censored at the date of their last visit. Participants who died from causes other than lung cancer and did not have documented disease progression were censored at the time of death.

Time frame: Up to Month 60

Population: Participants for whom cryoablation via Galil Medical Cryoablation System was attempted or performed (ITT Population) with available data at the respective time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
CryoablationOverall Disease-Specific Participant Survival Post-CryoablationWeek 1100 percentage of participants
CryoablationOverall Disease-Specific Participant Survival Post-CryoablationMonth 1100 percentage of participants
CryoablationOverall Disease-Specific Participant Survival Post-CryoablationMonth 3100 percentage of participants
CryoablationOverall Disease-Specific Participant Survival Post-CryoablationMonth 6100 percentage of participants
CryoablationOverall Disease-Specific Participant Survival Post-CryoablationMonth 12100 percentage of participants
CryoablationOverall Disease-Specific Participant Survival Post-CryoablationMonth 2486.5 percentage of participants
CryoablationOverall Disease-Specific Participant Survival Post-CryoablationMonth 3674.8 percentage of participants
CryoablationOverall Disease-Specific Participant Survival Post-CryoablationMonth 4871.5 percentage of participants
CryoablationOverall Disease-Specific Participant Survival Post-CryoablationMonth 6055.3 percentage of participants
Secondary

Time in Days to Disease Recurrence or Progression Following Study Cryoablation

Disease recurrence or progression will be determined locally by evidence of an increase in tumor size and/or contrast enhancement that met the definition of local tumor failure. Local tumor failure defined as a \>20% increase from baseline in the sum of the largest diameter of all targeted tumors. Participants without disease recurrence or progression were censored at the date of their last visit or their date of death due to any cause. The percentage of participants with disease recurrence or progression after the study cryoablation procedure at the specified number of days is presented.

Time frame: Baseline (0 days), Week 1 (7 days), and Months 3 (90 days), 6 (180 days), 12 (365 days), 24 (730 days), 36 (1095 days), 48 (1460 days), and 60 (1825 days)

Population: Participants for whom cryoablation via Galil Medical Cryoablation System was attempted or performed (ITT Population) with available data at the respective time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
CryoablationTime in Days to Disease Recurrence or Progression Following Study CryoablationBaseline0 percentage of participants
CryoablationTime in Days to Disease Recurrence or Progression Following Study CryoablationWeek 1 (7 days)0 percentage of participants
CryoablationTime in Days to Disease Recurrence or Progression Following Study CryoablationMonth 1 (30 days)0 percentage of participants
CryoablationTime in Days to Disease Recurrence or Progression Following Study CryoablationMonth 3 (90 days)0 percentage of participants
CryoablationTime in Days to Disease Recurrence or Progression Following Study CryoablationMonth 6 (180 days)2.5 percentage of participants
CryoablationTime in Days to Disease Recurrence or Progression Following Study CryoablationMonth 12 (365 days)5.1 percentage of participants
CryoablationTime in Days to Disease Recurrence or Progression Following Study CryoablationMonth 24 (730 days)10.7 percentage of participants
CryoablationTime in Days to Disease Recurrence or Progression Following Study CryoablationMonth 36 (1095 days)10.7 percentage of participants
CryoablationTime in Days to Disease Recurrence or Progression Following Study CryoablationMonth 48 (1460 days)10.7 percentage of participants
CryoablationTime in Days to Disease Recurrence or Progression Following Study CryoablationMonth 60 (1825 days)21.8 percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026