Metastatic Lung Cancer
Conditions
Keywords
Cryoablation, Cryotherapy, Cryosurgery, Metastatic, Lung, Pleura, Tumors
Brief summary
ECLIPSE will evaluate the safety and efficacy of cryoablation therapy used to treat tumors less than or equal to 3.5 centimeters (cm) in participants with pulmonary metastatic disease.
Detailed description
ECLIPSE is a treatment, Phase 1 multicenter, prospective, single-arm study with participants serving as their own control. This study is to enroll participants who will undergo cryoablation of at least 1 metastatic pulmonary tumor that is less than or equal to 3.5 cm. Participants will be followed for 5 years post their cryoablation procedure. Cryoablation is the process of destroying tissue by the application of extremely cold temperatures. Galil Medical Cryoablation Systems are used as a surgical tool in the fields of general surgery, dermatology (skin), neurology (nerves), chest surgery (including lung), Ears-Nose-Throat (ENT), gynecology, oncology (cancer), proctology (colon/rectal), and urology (kidney).
Interventions
Application of extremely cold temperatures to the identified tumor(s).
Sponsors
Study design
Intervention model description
All participants received the same treatment.
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Participant must be at least 18 years old. * Participant has signed a written informed consent. * Participant presents with Stage 4 pulmonary metastatic disease with metastatic disease previously confirmed by prior biopsy or confirmed on imaging with known primary disease. * Participant has up to 3 local metastases unilaterally targeted by cryoablation. Maximum of 5 total pulmonary tumors bilaterally. * Targeted tumor(s) defined as intra pulmonary or pleural with a maximum size of 3.5 cm. * The target tumor is determined (by CT/MRI) to be in a location where cryoablation is technically achievable based on the proximity of adjacent organs and structures. * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score of 0-2. * Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) score ≥60. * Platelet count \>50,000/cubed millimeters (mm\^3) within 60 days prior to study treatment. * International normalized ratio (INR) less than 1.5 within 60 days prior to study treatment. * Participant has a life expectancy of \>3 months. * Participant is clinically suitable for cryoablation procedure.
Exclusion criteria
* Participant's primary cancer is lung cancer. * Participant is unable to lie flat or has respiratory distress at rest. * Participant has uncontrolled coagulopathy or bleeding disorders. * Participant has had chemotherapy with neutropenia to levels as confirmed by absolute neutrophil count (ANC) of less than 1000 that produce increase risk for the cryoablation procedure. * Participant has a history of an allergic reaction to iodine injections or to shellfish. * Participant has evidence of active systemic, pulmonary, or pericardial infection. * Participant has a debilitating medical or psychiatric illness that would preclude giving informed consent or receiving optimal treatment or follow up. * Participant is currently participating in other experimental studies that could affect the primary endpoint.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Local Tumor Control for Each Index Tumor as Measured by Imaging at Month 60 | Baseline and Month 60 | Local tumor control was achieved if either the greatest trans-axial diameter of a treated tumor was ≤20% greater than at the pre-procedure assessment (per-tumor assessment) or if the sum of greatest trans-axial diameters of all treated tumors for a participant was ≤20% greater than the sum for the pre-procedure assessment of those tumors (per-participant assessment). Complete Response defined as tumor disappearance (scar) or \<25% of original size. If tumor/ablation zone had likely disappeared, the measurement was recorded as 0 mm; if tumor/ablation zone was present but too small to measure, the measurement was recorded as 5 mm. Partial Response defined as greater than 30% decrease in sum of the largest diameter of all targeted tumors. Stable Disease defined as less than 30% decrease in sum of the largest diameter of all targeted tumors. Local Failure defined as greater than 20% increase in the sum of the largest diameter of all targeted tumors. Worst response per participant was used. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Disease-Specific Participant Survival Post-Cryoablation | Up to Month 60 | Disease-specific survival was analyzed as time in days from study cryoablation to participant death due to lung cancer. All deaths with documented lung disease progression were categorized as disease-specific deaths for this analysis. Participants who were alive were censored at the date of their last visit. Participants who died from causes other than lung cancer and did not have documented disease progression were censored at the time of death. |
| Time in Days to Disease Recurrence or Progression Following Study Cryoablation | Baseline (0 days), Week 1 (7 days), and Months 3 (90 days), 6 (180 days), 12 (365 days), 24 (730 days), 36 (1095 days), 48 (1460 days), and 60 (1825 days) | Disease recurrence or progression will be determined locally by evidence of an increase in tumor size and/or contrast enhancement that met the definition of local tumor failure. Local tumor failure defined as a \>20% increase from baseline in the sum of the largest diameter of all targeted tumors. Participants without disease recurrence or progression were censored at the date of their last visit or their date of death due to any cause. The percentage of participants with disease recurrence or progression after the study cryoablation procedure at the specified number of days is presented. |
| Change From Baseline in ECOG Performance Status at Week 1 and Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 | Baseline, Week 1 and Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 | ECOG Performance Status defined as a set of criteria with corresponding scores used by the Investigator to assess how a participant's disease is progressing, assess how the disease affects the daily living abilities of the participant, and determine appropriate treatment and prognosis. ECOG Performance Status Scoring: 0=Fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease performance without restriction; 1=Restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory and able to carry out work of a light or sedentary nature (for example, light house work, office work); 2=Ambulatory and capable of all self-care but unable to carry out any work activities. Up and about more than 50% of waking hours; 3=Capable of only limited self-care, confined to bed or chair more than 50% of waking hours; 4=Completely disabled. Cannot carry on any self-care. Totally confined to bed or chair; 5=Dead. |
| Change From Baseline in Physical Function as Assessed by the KPS Scale at Week 1 and Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 | Baseline, Week 1 and Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 | The KPS Scale is a standard way of measuring the ability of cancer patients to perform ordinary tasks. The scores range from 0 to 100. A higher score means the participant is better able to carry out daily activities. KPS may be used to determine a participant's prognosis, to measure changes in a participant's ability to function. |
| Local Tumor Control for Each Index Tumor as Measured by Imaging at Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48 | Baseline and Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48 | Local tumor control was achieved if the greatest trans-axial diameter of a treated tumor was ≤20% greater than at the pre-procedure assessment (per-tumor assessment) or if the sum of the greatest trans-axial diameters of all treated tumors for a participant was ≤20% greater than the sum for the pre-procedure assessment of those tumors (per-participant assessment). Complete Response defined as tumor disappearance (scar) or \<25% of original size. If tumor/ablation zone had likely disappeared, the measurement was recorded as 0 mm; if tumor/ablation zone was present but too small to measure, the measurement was recorded as 5 mm. Partial Response defined as greater than 30% decrease in sum of the largest diameter of all targeted tumors. Stable Disease defined as less than 30% decrease in sum of the largest diameter of all targeted tumors. Local Failure defined as greater than 20% increase in the sum of the largest diameter of all targeted tumors. Worst response per participant was used. |
| Cryoablation Technical Success of the Study Cryoablation Procedure | Up to 60 months | A technically successful treatment was defined by an ablation volume encompassing the tumor with at least a 5 mm margin. Technical success was calculated on a per tumor level as well as a participant level. To be considered a technical success on a participant level, all tumors treated during the baseline procedure were required to meet the technical success criteria (that is, an ablation volume encompassing the tumor with at least a 5 mm margin). |
| Number of Participants With an Intra- or Post-operative Adverse Event (AE), a Serious AE, or an Unanticipated Adverse Device Effect (UADE) | Baseline up to 30 days post-cryoablation | An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that develops or worsens in severity during the conduct of a clinical study. Serious AEs include death, a life-threatening AE, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, persistent or significant disability or incapacity, a congenital anomaly or birth defect, or an important medical event that jeopardized the participant and required medical intervention to prevent the previously listed serious outcomes. UADE was any serious adverse effect, any life-threatening problem or death caused by or associated with a device, if it was not previously identified in nature, severity, or degree of incidence in the application; or any other unanticipated serious problem associated with a device. The AEs that are presented were considered related to the cryoablation procedure. A summary of other non-serious AEs and all serious AEs, regardless of causality is located in Reported AE section. |
| Metastatic Disease Spread as Measured by Imaging | Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 | Evidence of additional metastatic disease post cryoablation procedure as measured by imaging is presented. |
| Change From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 | Baseline, Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 | The SF-12 is a shortened version of the well-known SF-36. The SF-12 assesses eight domains (physical functioning, role limitations due to physical health problems, bodily pain, social functioning, general mental health, role limitations due to emotional problems, vitality and general health perception). Assessments were made by examining the change in the baseline scores to those reported post-operatively. The scores range from 0 to 100. A higher value indicates a better quality of life of the participant. |
Countries
France, United States
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Cryoablation Participants underwent a cryoablation procedure with the Galil Medical Cryoablation System according to the manufacturer's guidelines. Participant preparation, anesthesia, intra-operative monitoring, and postoperative management for the study cryoablation procedure were identical to those for standard cryoablation treatment routinely performed at the clinical centers that participated in this study and were at the discretion of the Investigators. No more than 3 tumors in 1 lung were treated in a single session, and no more than 5 total lung tumors (across both lungs) were treated during the study. | 40 |
| Total | 40 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Death | 20 |
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 1 |
| Overall Study | Starting Hospice | 1 |
| Overall Study | Treatment Failure | 1 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Cryoablation |
|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 62.6 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.3 |
| Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status | 0.3 score on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.5 |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | 2 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | 19 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 19 Participants |
| Physical Function as Assessed by the Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) Scale | 95.5 score on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.1 |
| Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the Short Form-12 (SF-12) Generic Measure Bodily Pain | 77.3 score on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 26.8 |
| Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the Short Form-12 (SF-12) Generic Measure General Health Perception | 63.9 score on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 23.3 |
| Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the Short Form-12 (SF-12) Generic Measure Mental Health | 69.5 score on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.2 |
| Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the Short Form-12 (SF-12) Generic Measure Physical Functioning | 71.2 score on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 34.9 |
| Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the Short Form-12 (SF-12) Generic Measure Role Emotional | 78.4 score on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 21 |
| Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the Short Form-12 (SF-12) Generic Measure Role Physical | 62.1 score on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 29.7 |
| Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the Short Form-12 (SF-12) Generic Measure Social Functioning | 80.5 score on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 26.7 |
| Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the Short Form-12 (SF-12) Generic Measure Vitality | 57.8 score on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 22.4 |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 1 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 2 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 1 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 19 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 17 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 16 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 24 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk |
|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 20 / 40 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 32 / 40 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 6 / 40 |
Outcome results
Local Tumor Control for Each Index Tumor as Measured by Imaging at Month 60
Local tumor control was achieved if either the greatest trans-axial diameter of a treated tumor was ≤20% greater than at the pre-procedure assessment (per-tumor assessment) or if the sum of greatest trans-axial diameters of all treated tumors for a participant was ≤20% greater than the sum for the pre-procedure assessment of those tumors (per-participant assessment). Complete Response defined as tumor disappearance (scar) or \<25% of original size. If tumor/ablation zone had likely disappeared, the measurement was recorded as 0 mm; if tumor/ablation zone was present but too small to measure, the measurement was recorded as 5 mm. Partial Response defined as greater than 30% decrease in sum of the largest diameter of all targeted tumors. Stable Disease defined as less than 30% decrease in sum of the largest diameter of all targeted tumors. Local Failure defined as greater than 20% increase in the sum of the largest diameter of all targeted tumors. Worst response per participant was used.
Time frame: Baseline and Month 60
Population: Participants for whom cryoablation via Galil Medical Cryoablation System was attempted or performed (ITT Population) with available data at the respective time point.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cryoablation | Local Tumor Control for Each Index Tumor as Measured by Imaging at Month 60 | Local Control, Month 60 | 80.0 percentage of tumors |
| Cryoablation | Local Tumor Control for Each Index Tumor as Measured by Imaging at Month 60 | Complete Response, Month 60 | 45.0 percentage of tumors |
| Cryoablation | Local Tumor Control for Each Index Tumor as Measured by Imaging at Month 60 | Partial Response, Month 60 | 15.0 percentage of tumors |
| Cryoablation | Local Tumor Control for Each Index Tumor as Measured by Imaging at Month 60 | Stable Disease, Month 60 | 20.0 percentage of tumors |
| Cryoablation | Local Tumor Control for Each Index Tumor as Measured by Imaging at Month 60 | Local Failure, Month 60 | 20.0 percentage of tumors |
Change From Baseline in ECOG Performance Status at Week 1 and Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60
ECOG Performance Status defined as a set of criteria with corresponding scores used by the Investigator to assess how a participant's disease is progressing, assess how the disease affects the daily living abilities of the participant, and determine appropriate treatment and prognosis. ECOG Performance Status Scoring: 0=Fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease performance without restriction; 1=Restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory and able to carry out work of a light or sedentary nature (for example, light house work, office work); 2=Ambulatory and capable of all self-care but unable to carry out any work activities. Up and about more than 50% of waking hours; 3=Capable of only limited self-care, confined to bed or chair more than 50% of waking hours; 4=Completely disabled. Cannot carry on any self-care. Totally confined to bed or chair; 5=Dead.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 1 and Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60
Population: Participants for whom cryoablation via Galil Medical Cryoablation System was attempted or performed (ITT Population) with available data at the respective time point.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cryoablation | Change From Baseline in ECOG Performance Status at Week 1 and Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 | Change at Week 1 | 0.1 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.5 |
| Cryoablation | Change From Baseline in ECOG Performance Status at Week 1 and Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 | Change at Month 1 | 0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.4 |
| Cryoablation | Change From Baseline in ECOG Performance Status at Week 1 and Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 | Change at Month 3 | 0.2 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.4 |
| Cryoablation | Change From Baseline in ECOG Performance Status at Week 1 and Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 | Change at Month 6 | 0.1 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.4 |
| Cryoablation | Change From Baseline in ECOG Performance Status at Week 1 and Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 | Change at Month 12 | 0.2 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.6 |
| Cryoablation | Change From Baseline in ECOG Performance Status at Week 1 and Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 | Change at Month 24 | 0.2 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.6 |
| Cryoablation | Change From Baseline in ECOG Performance Status at Week 1 and Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 | Change at Month 36 | -0.1 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.5 |
| Cryoablation | Change From Baseline in ECOG Performance Status at Week 1 and Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 | Change at Month 48 | 0.2 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.8 |
| Cryoablation | Change From Baseline in ECOG Performance Status at Week 1 and Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 | Change at Month 60 | 0.6 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1 |
Change From Baseline in Physical Function as Assessed by the KPS Scale at Week 1 and Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60
The KPS Scale is a standard way of measuring the ability of cancer patients to perform ordinary tasks. The scores range from 0 to 100. A higher score means the participant is better able to carry out daily activities. KPS may be used to determine a participant's prognosis, to measure changes in a participant's ability to function.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 1 and Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60
Population: Participants for whom cryoablation via Galil Medical Cryoablation System was attempted or performed (ITT Population) with available data at the respective time point.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cryoablation | Change From Baseline in Physical Function as Assessed by the KPS Scale at Week 1 and Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 | Baseline | 95.5 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.1 |
| Cryoablation | Change From Baseline in Physical Function as Assessed by the KPS Scale at Week 1 and Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 | Change at Week 1 | -1.8 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.1 |
| Cryoablation | Change From Baseline in Physical Function as Assessed by the KPS Scale at Week 1 and Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 | Change at Month 1 | -0.9 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.3 |
| Cryoablation | Change From Baseline in Physical Function as Assessed by the KPS Scale at Week 1 and Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 | Change at Month 3 | -1.6 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.3 |
| Cryoablation | Change From Baseline in Physical Function as Assessed by the KPS Scale at Week 1 and Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 | Change at Month 6 | 0.3 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.2 |
| Cryoablation | Change From Baseline in Physical Function as Assessed by the KPS Scale at Week 1 and Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 | Change at Month 12 | -0.5 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.4 |
| Cryoablation | Change From Baseline in Physical Function as Assessed by the KPS Scale at Week 1 and Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 | Change at Month 24 | 4.4 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.3 |
| Cryoablation | Change From Baseline in Physical Function as Assessed by the KPS Scale at Week 1 and Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 | Change at Month 36 | 7.8 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.4 |
| Cryoablation | Change From Baseline in Physical Function as Assessed by the KPS Scale at Week 1 and Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 | Change at Month 48 | 5.0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.5 |
| Cryoablation | Change From Baseline in Physical Function as Assessed by the KPS Scale at Week 1 and Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 | Change at Month 60 | 6.7 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.8 |
Change From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60
The SF-12 is a shortened version of the well-known SF-36. The SF-12 assesses eight domains (physical functioning, role limitations due to physical health problems, bodily pain, social functioning, general mental health, role limitations due to emotional problems, vitality and general health perception). Assessments were made by examining the change in the baseline scores to those reported post-operatively. The scores range from 0 to 100. A higher value indicates a better quality of life of the participant.
Time frame: Baseline, Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60
Population: Participants for whom cryoablation via Galil Medical Cryoablation System was attempted or performed (ITT Population) with available data at the respective time point.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cryoablation | Change From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 | Physical Functioning, Change at Month 1 | -10.0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 24.2 |
| Cryoablation | Change From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 | Physical Functioning, Change at Month 3 | -12.0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 24.4 |
| Cryoablation | Change From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 | Physical Functioning, Change at Month 6 | -12.5 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 33 |
| Cryoablation | Change From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 | Physical Functioning, Change at Month 12 | -23.9 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 38 |
| Cryoablation | Change From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 | Physical Functioning, Change at Month 24 | -10.4 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 44.5 |
| Cryoablation | Change From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 | Physical Functioning, Change at Month 36 | -12.5 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 31.7 |
| Cryoablation | Change From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 | Physical Functioning, Change at Month 48 | -10.7 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 31.8 |
| Cryoablation | Change From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 | Physical Functioning, Change at Month 60 | -12.5 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 54.2 |
| Cryoablation | Change From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 | Role Physical, Change at Month 1 | 4.2 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 24.2 |
| Cryoablation | Change From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 | Role Physical, Change at Month 3 | -1.9 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 21 |
| Cryoablation | Change From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 | Role Physical, Change at Month 6 | -0.4 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.7 |
| Cryoablation | Change From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 | Role Physical, Change at Month 12 | -2.2 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 26.8 |
| Cryoablation | Change From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 | Role Physical, Change at Month 24 | 5.2 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 23.5 |
| Cryoablation | Change From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 | Role Physical, Change at Month 36 | 5.0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 25.8 |
| Cryoablation | Change From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 | Role Physical, Change at Month 48 | 3.6 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 35.9 |
| Cryoablation | Change From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 | Role Physical, Change at Month 60 | -4.2 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 25.8 |
| Cryoablation | Change From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 | Bodily Pain, Change at Month 1 | -9.2 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 25.8 |
| Cryoablation | Change From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 | Bodily Pain, Change at Month 3 | -3.7 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 21.6 |
| Cryoablation | Change From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 | Bodily Pain, Change at Month 6 | -9.8 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 24.9 |
| Cryoablation | Change From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 | Bodily Pain, Change at Month 12 | -7.6 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.1 |
| Cryoablation | Change From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 | Bodily Pain, Change at Month 24 | -18.8 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 32.2 |
| Cryoablation | Change From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 | Bodily Pain, Change at Month 36 | -5.0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 30.7 |
| Cryoablation | Change From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 | Bodily Pain, Change at Month 48 | 0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 28.9 |
| Cryoablation | Change From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 | Bodily Pain, Change at Month 60 | -8.3 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 49.2 |
| Cryoablation | Change From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 | Social Functioning, Change at Month 1 | -8.6 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 26.1 |
| Cryoablation | Change From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 | Social Functioning, Change at Month 3 | -3.7 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 23.7 |
| Cryoablation | Change From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 | Social Functioning, Change at Month 6 | -4.6 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 22 |
| Cryoablation | Change From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 | Social Functioning, Change at Month 12 | -11.4 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 24.1 |
| Cryoablation | Change From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 | Social Functioning, Change at Month 24 | -12.5 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 32.9 |
| Cryoablation | Change From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 | Social Functioning, Change at Month 36 | -2.5 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 24.9 |
| Cryoablation | Change From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 | Social Functioning, Change at Month 48 | -3.6 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 39.3 |
| Cryoablation | Change From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 | Social Functioning, Change at Month 60 | -12.5 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 37.9 |
| Cryoablation | Change From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 | Mental Health, Change at Month 1 | 1.7 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.3 |
| Cryoablation | Change From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 | Mental Health, Change at Month 3 | 0.9 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 12 |
| Cryoablation | Change From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 | Mental Health, Change at Month 6 | -1.4 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.6 |
| Cryoablation | Change From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 | Mental Health, Change at Month 12 | -0.6 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.6 |
| Cryoablation | Change From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 | Mental Health, Change at Month 24 | -3.1 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 17 |
| Cryoablation | Change From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 | Mental Health, Change at Month 36 | 3.8 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 15.6 |
| Cryoablation | Change From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 | Mental Health, Change at Month 48 | 8.9 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.4 |
| Cryoablation | Change From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 | Mental Health, Change at Month 60 | 0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 13.7 |
| Cryoablation | Change From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 | Role Emotional, Change at Month 1 | -3.3 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.5 |
| Cryoablation | Change From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 | Role Emotional, Change at Month 3 | -11.6 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 23 |
| Cryoablation | Change From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 | Role Emotional, Change at Month 6 | -2.7 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 24.4 |
| Cryoablation | Change From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 | Role Emotional, Change at Month 12 | -3.8 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 21.1 |
| Cryoablation | Change From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 | Role Emotional, Change at Month 24 | -11.5 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 24.1 |
| Cryoablation | Change From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 | Role Emotional, Change at Month 36 | -11.3 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 27.9 |
| Cryoablation | Change From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 | Role Emotional, Change at Month 48 | -8.9 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 15.7 |
| Cryoablation | Change From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 | Role Emotional, Change at Month 60 | -22.9 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 26.7 |
| Cryoablation | Change From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 | Vitality, Change at Month 1 | -6.0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 22.8 |
| Cryoablation | Change From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 | Vitality, Change at Month 3 | -9.3 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.8 |
| Cryoablation | Change From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 | Vitality, Change at Month 6 | -6.5 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 22.6 |
| Cryoablation | Change From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 | Vitality, Change at Month 12 | -10.2 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 24 |
| Cryoablation | Change From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 | Vitality, Change at Month 24 | -14.6 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 22.5 |
| Cryoablation | Change From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 | Vitality, Change at Month 36 | -2.5 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 27.5 |
| Cryoablation | Change From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 | Vitality, Change at Month 48 | -7.1 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 23.8 |
| Cryoablation | Change From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 | Vitality, Change at Month 60 | -4.2 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 29.2 |
| Cryoablation | Change From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 | General Health Perception, Change at Month 1 | -3.8 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.9 |
| Cryoablation | Change From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 | General Health Perception, Change at Month 3 | 2.4 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 26.1 |
| Cryoablation | Change From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 | General Health Perception, Change at Month 6 | 0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 23.5 |
| Cryoablation | Change From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 | General Health Perception, Change at Month 12 | -5.2 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 31.4 |
| Cryoablation | Change From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 | General Health Perception, Change at Month 24 | -11.3 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 22.2 |
| Cryoablation | Change From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 | General Health Perception, Change at Month 36 | -14.5 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 24.1 |
| Cryoablation | Change From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 | General Health Perception, Change at Month 48 | -14.3 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 28.9 |
| Cryoablation | Change From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 | General Health Perception, Change at Month 60 | -22.5 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 33.6 |
Cryoablation Technical Success of the Study Cryoablation Procedure
A technically successful treatment was defined by an ablation volume encompassing the tumor with at least a 5 mm margin. Technical success was calculated on a per tumor level as well as a participant level. To be considered a technical success on a participant level, all tumors treated during the baseline procedure were required to meet the technical success criteria (that is, an ablation volume encompassing the tumor with at least a 5 mm margin).
Time frame: Up to 60 months
Population: Participants for whom cryoablation via Galil Medical Cryoablation System was attempted or performed (ITT Population).
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Cryoablation | Cryoablation Technical Success of the Study Cryoablation Procedure | 100 percentage of tumors |
Local Tumor Control for Each Index Tumor as Measured by Imaging at Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48
Local tumor control was achieved if the greatest trans-axial diameter of a treated tumor was ≤20% greater than at the pre-procedure assessment (per-tumor assessment) or if the sum of the greatest trans-axial diameters of all treated tumors for a participant was ≤20% greater than the sum for the pre-procedure assessment of those tumors (per-participant assessment). Complete Response defined as tumor disappearance (scar) or \<25% of original size. If tumor/ablation zone had likely disappeared, the measurement was recorded as 0 mm; if tumor/ablation zone was present but too small to measure, the measurement was recorded as 5 mm. Partial Response defined as greater than 30% decrease in sum of the largest diameter of all targeted tumors. Stable Disease defined as less than 30% decrease in sum of the largest diameter of all targeted tumors. Local Failure defined as greater than 20% increase in the sum of the largest diameter of all targeted tumors. Worst response per participant was used.
Time frame: Baseline and Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48
Population: Participants for whom cryoablation via Galil Medical Cryoablation System was attempted or performed (ITT Population) with available data at the respective time point.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cryoablation | Local Tumor Control for Each Index Tumor as Measured by Imaging at Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48 | Stable Disease, Month 3 | 37.5 percentage of tumors |
| Cryoablation | Local Tumor Control for Each Index Tumor as Measured by Imaging at Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48 | Local Control, Month 3 | 46.4 percentage of tumors |
| Cryoablation | Local Tumor Control for Each Index Tumor as Measured by Imaging at Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48 | Local Control, Month 6 | 66.7 percentage of tumors |
| Cryoablation | Local Tumor Control for Each Index Tumor as Measured by Imaging at Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48 | Local Control, Month 12 | 80.4 percentage of tumors |
| Cryoablation | Local Tumor Control for Each Index Tumor as Measured by Imaging at Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48 | Local Control, Month 24 | 87.5 percentage of tumors |
| Cryoablation | Local Tumor Control for Each Index Tumor as Measured by Imaging at Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48 | Local Control, Month 48 | 90.9 percentage of tumors |
| Cryoablation | Local Tumor Control for Each Index Tumor as Measured by Imaging at Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48 | Local Control, Month 36 | 90.3 percentage of tumors |
| Cryoablation | Local Tumor Control for Each Index Tumor as Measured by Imaging at Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48 | Complete Response, Month 3 | 5.4 percentage of tumors |
| Cryoablation | Local Tumor Control for Each Index Tumor as Measured by Imaging at Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48 | Complete Response, Month 6 | 15.8 percentage of tumors |
| Cryoablation | Local Tumor Control for Each Index Tumor as Measured by Imaging at Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48 | Complete Response, Month 12 | 23.5 percentage of tumors |
| Cryoablation | Local Tumor Control for Each Index Tumor as Measured by Imaging at Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48 | Complete Response, Month 24 | 40.0 percentage of tumors |
| Cryoablation | Local Tumor Control for Each Index Tumor as Measured by Imaging at Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48 | Complete Response, Month 36 | 38.7 percentage of tumors |
| Cryoablation | Local Tumor Control for Each Index Tumor as Measured by Imaging at Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48 | Complete Response, Month 48 | 40.9 percentage of tumors |
| Cryoablation | Local Tumor Control for Each Index Tumor as Measured by Imaging at Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48 | Partial Response, Month 3 | 3.6 percentage of tumors |
| Cryoablation | Local Tumor Control for Each Index Tumor as Measured by Imaging at Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48 | Partial Response, Month 6 | 10.5 percentage of tumors |
| Cryoablation | Local Tumor Control for Each Index Tumor as Measured by Imaging at Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48 | Partial Response, Month 12 | 15.7 percentage of tumors |
| Cryoablation | Local Tumor Control for Each Index Tumor as Measured by Imaging at Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48 | Partial Response, Month 24 | 10.0 percentage of tumors |
| Cryoablation | Local Tumor Control for Each Index Tumor as Measured by Imaging at Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48 | Partial Response, Month 36 | 16.1 percentage of tumors |
| Cryoablation | Local Tumor Control for Each Index Tumor as Measured by Imaging at Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48 | Partial Response, Month 48 | 22.7 percentage of tumors |
| Cryoablation | Local Tumor Control for Each Index Tumor as Measured by Imaging at Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48 | Stable Disease, Month 6 | 40.4 percentage of tumors |
| Cryoablation | Local Tumor Control for Each Index Tumor as Measured by Imaging at Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48 | Stable Disease, Month 12 | 41.2 percentage of tumors |
| Cryoablation | Local Tumor Control for Each Index Tumor as Measured by Imaging at Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48 | Stable Disease, Month 24 | 37.5 percentage of tumors |
| Cryoablation | Local Tumor Control for Each Index Tumor as Measured by Imaging at Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48 | Stable Disease, Month 36 | 35.5 percentage of tumors |
| Cryoablation | Local Tumor Control for Each Index Tumor as Measured by Imaging at Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48 | Stable Disease, Month 48 | 27.3 percentage of tumors |
| Cryoablation | Local Tumor Control for Each Index Tumor as Measured by Imaging at Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48 | Local Failure, Month 3 | 53.6 percentage of tumors |
| Cryoablation | Local Tumor Control for Each Index Tumor as Measured by Imaging at Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48 | Local Failure, Month 6 | 33.3 percentage of tumors |
| Cryoablation | Local Tumor Control for Each Index Tumor as Measured by Imaging at Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48 | Local Failure, Month 12 | 19.6 percentage of tumors |
| Cryoablation | Local Tumor Control for Each Index Tumor as Measured by Imaging at Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48 | Local Failure, Month 24 | 12.5 percentage of tumors |
| Cryoablation | Local Tumor Control for Each Index Tumor as Measured by Imaging at Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48 | Local Failure, Month 36 | 9.7 percentage of tumors |
| Cryoablation | Local Tumor Control for Each Index Tumor as Measured by Imaging at Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48 | Local Failure, Month 48 | 9.1 percentage of tumors |
Metastatic Disease Spread as Measured by Imaging
Evidence of additional metastatic disease post cryoablation procedure as measured by imaging is presented.
Time frame: Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60
Population: Participants for whom cryoablation via Galil Medical Cryoablation System was attempted or performed (ITT Population) with available data at the respective time point.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cryoablation | Metastatic Disease Spread as Measured by Imaging | Month 3 | 16 Participants |
| Cryoablation | Metastatic Disease Spread as Measured by Imaging | Month 6 | 14 Participants |
| Cryoablation | Metastatic Disease Spread as Measured by Imaging | Month 12 | 14 Participants |
| Cryoablation | Metastatic Disease Spread as Measured by Imaging | Month 24 | 10 Participants |
| Cryoablation | Metastatic Disease Spread as Measured by Imaging | Month 36 | 9 Participants |
| Cryoablation | Metastatic Disease Spread as Measured by Imaging | Month 48 | 7 Participants |
| Cryoablation | Metastatic Disease Spread as Measured by Imaging | Month 60 | 6 Participants |
Number of Participants With an Intra- or Post-operative Adverse Event (AE), a Serious AE, or an Unanticipated Adverse Device Effect (UADE)
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that develops or worsens in severity during the conduct of a clinical study. Serious AEs include death, a life-threatening AE, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, persistent or significant disability or incapacity, a congenital anomaly or birth defect, or an important medical event that jeopardized the participant and required medical intervention to prevent the previously listed serious outcomes. UADE was any serious adverse effect, any life-threatening problem or death caused by or associated with a device, if it was not previously identified in nature, severity, or degree of incidence in the application; or any other unanticipated serious problem associated with a device. The AEs that are presented were considered related to the cryoablation procedure. A summary of other non-serious AEs and all serious AEs, regardless of causality is located in Reported AE section.
Time frame: Baseline up to 30 days post-cryoablation
Population: Participants for whom cryoablation via Galil Medical Cryoablation System was attempted or performed (ITT Population).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cryoablation | Number of Participants With an Intra- or Post-operative Adverse Event (AE), a Serious AE, or an Unanticipated Adverse Device Effect (UADE) | Intra-operative nonserious AE (NSAE) | 23 Participants |
| Cryoablation | Number of Participants With an Intra- or Post-operative Adverse Event (AE), a Serious AE, or an Unanticipated Adverse Device Effect (UADE) | Post-operative NSAE, prior to discharge | 9 Participants |
| Cryoablation | Number of Participants With an Intra- or Post-operative Adverse Event (AE), a Serious AE, or an Unanticipated Adverse Device Effect (UADE) | Post-operative NSAE within 30 days of procedure | 19 Participants |
| Cryoablation | Number of Participants With an Intra- or Post-operative Adverse Event (AE), a Serious AE, or an Unanticipated Adverse Device Effect (UADE) | Serious AE | 6 Participants |
| Cryoablation | Number of Participants With an Intra- or Post-operative Adverse Event (AE), a Serious AE, or an Unanticipated Adverse Device Effect (UADE) | UADE | 0 Participants |
Overall Disease-Specific Participant Survival Post-Cryoablation
Disease-specific survival was analyzed as time in days from study cryoablation to participant death due to lung cancer. All deaths with documented lung disease progression were categorized as disease-specific deaths for this analysis. Participants who were alive were censored at the date of their last visit. Participants who died from causes other than lung cancer and did not have documented disease progression were censored at the time of death.
Time frame: Up to Month 60
Population: Participants for whom cryoablation via Galil Medical Cryoablation System was attempted or performed (ITT Population) with available data at the respective time point.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cryoablation | Overall Disease-Specific Participant Survival Post-Cryoablation | Week 1 | 100 percentage of participants |
| Cryoablation | Overall Disease-Specific Participant Survival Post-Cryoablation | Month 1 | 100 percentage of participants |
| Cryoablation | Overall Disease-Specific Participant Survival Post-Cryoablation | Month 3 | 100 percentage of participants |
| Cryoablation | Overall Disease-Specific Participant Survival Post-Cryoablation | Month 6 | 100 percentage of participants |
| Cryoablation | Overall Disease-Specific Participant Survival Post-Cryoablation | Month 12 | 100 percentage of participants |
| Cryoablation | Overall Disease-Specific Participant Survival Post-Cryoablation | Month 24 | 86.5 percentage of participants |
| Cryoablation | Overall Disease-Specific Participant Survival Post-Cryoablation | Month 36 | 74.8 percentage of participants |
| Cryoablation | Overall Disease-Specific Participant Survival Post-Cryoablation | Month 48 | 71.5 percentage of participants |
| Cryoablation | Overall Disease-Specific Participant Survival Post-Cryoablation | Month 60 | 55.3 percentage of participants |
Time in Days to Disease Recurrence or Progression Following Study Cryoablation
Disease recurrence or progression will be determined locally by evidence of an increase in tumor size and/or contrast enhancement that met the definition of local tumor failure. Local tumor failure defined as a \>20% increase from baseline in the sum of the largest diameter of all targeted tumors. Participants without disease recurrence or progression were censored at the date of their last visit or their date of death due to any cause. The percentage of participants with disease recurrence or progression after the study cryoablation procedure at the specified number of days is presented.
Time frame: Baseline (0 days), Week 1 (7 days), and Months 3 (90 days), 6 (180 days), 12 (365 days), 24 (730 days), 36 (1095 days), 48 (1460 days), and 60 (1825 days)
Population: Participants for whom cryoablation via Galil Medical Cryoablation System was attempted or performed (ITT Population) with available data at the respective time point.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cryoablation | Time in Days to Disease Recurrence or Progression Following Study Cryoablation | Baseline | 0 percentage of participants |
| Cryoablation | Time in Days to Disease Recurrence or Progression Following Study Cryoablation | Week 1 (7 days) | 0 percentage of participants |
| Cryoablation | Time in Days to Disease Recurrence or Progression Following Study Cryoablation | Month 1 (30 days) | 0 percentage of participants |
| Cryoablation | Time in Days to Disease Recurrence or Progression Following Study Cryoablation | Month 3 (90 days) | 0 percentage of participants |
| Cryoablation | Time in Days to Disease Recurrence or Progression Following Study Cryoablation | Month 6 (180 days) | 2.5 percentage of participants |
| Cryoablation | Time in Days to Disease Recurrence or Progression Following Study Cryoablation | Month 12 (365 days) | 5.1 percentage of participants |
| Cryoablation | Time in Days to Disease Recurrence or Progression Following Study Cryoablation | Month 24 (730 days) | 10.7 percentage of participants |
| Cryoablation | Time in Days to Disease Recurrence or Progression Following Study Cryoablation | Month 36 (1095 days) | 10.7 percentage of participants |
| Cryoablation | Time in Days to Disease Recurrence or Progression Following Study Cryoablation | Month 48 (1460 days) | 10.7 percentage of participants |
| Cryoablation | Time in Days to Disease Recurrence or Progression Following Study Cryoablation | Month 60 (1825 days) | 21.8 percentage of participants |