Skip to content

Ultrasound-guided Dual TAP Block: Magnetic Resonance (MR) Evaluation of the Distribution of Local Anesthetic

Dual TAP Block Characteristics - Evaluation of Local Anesthetic Distribution by MR Scanning

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01305603
Enrollment
10
Registered
2011-03-01
Start date
2011-02-28
Completion date
2013-04-30
Last updated
2013-04-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pain, Postoperative

Brief summary

Using Magnetic resonance (MR) scanning and ultrasonography the investigators wish to investigate, in what way a known volume of local anesthetic injectate will be distributed in the transverse abdominis plane (TAP) in young healthy male volunteers. The investigators compare the anatomical distribution of the local anesthetic injectate in the TAP when performing an ultrasound-guided classical TAP block and a Dual TAP block. The investigators also want to compare the spread of anesthetized frontal dermatomes when performing an ultrasound-guided classical TAP block and a Dual TAP block.

Detailed description

There has been much debate as to what extent the classical TAP block will anesthetize more than the frontal dermatomes (TH10-Th12/L1). Some cadaver studies have been performed with injection of dye in the classical TAP. However, it is still not clear whether a single injection of local anesthetic in the classical TAP block position will reach the more cephalad and medial intercostal TAP plexus (Th6-Th9). In this study the investigators use MR scanning and ultrasonography to investigate in what way a known volume of local anesthetic injectate will be distributed in the transverse abdominis plane (TAP) in young healthy male volunteers. The investigators compare the anatomical distribution of the local anesthetic injectate in the TAP when performing an ultrasound-guided classical TAP block and a Dual TAP block. The investigators also want to compare the spread of anesthetized frontal dermatomes when performing an ultrasound-guided classical TAP block and a Dual TAP block.

Interventions

DRUGBupivacaine

On both sides of the abdomen 30 ml of bupivacaine 2.5 mg/ml will be injected. This is a total of 60 ml of bupivacaine 2.5 mg/ml.

PROCEDUREInjection

Injection under ultrasound-guidance

Sponsors

Bispebjerg Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* healthy male * 18 years old or more * had no previous abdominal surgery * no regular medication * no coagulation disorders * no claustrophobia

Exclusion criteria

* if the volunteer is not able to accept an uncomplicated administration of a classical (single) or dual TAP block

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Distribution of local anesthetic evaluated by MR scanning30 minutes after administering the TAP blocks

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Spread of anesthetized frontal dermatomes30 minutes after administering the TAP blocks

Countries

Denmark

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026