Skip to content

Augment® Injectable Bone Graft Compared to Autologous Bone Graft as a Bone Regeneration Device in Hindfoot Fusions

A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Multi-Center, Pivotal Human Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of Augment® Injectable Bone Graft Compared to Autologous Bone Graft as a Bone Regeneration Device in Hindfoot Fusions

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01305356
Enrollment
299
Registered
2011-02-28
Start date
2011-03-31
Completion date
2014-04-30
Last updated
2018-12-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Arthritis, Congenital Deformity, Degenerative Joint Disease, Osteoarthritis, Rheumatoid Arthritis

Keywords

degenerative joint disease, DJD, joint fusion, hindfoot, congenital deformity, osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, post-traumatic arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, Augment(tm) Injectable Bone Graft, autologous bone graft, autogenous bone graft, beta-TCP, bovine collagen, rhPDGF(bb)

Brief summary

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To demonstrate equivalent clinical and radiologic outcomes as gold standard (Autologous Bone Graft) in a representative clinical model (hindfoot fusions) STUDY HYPOTHESIS: Augment® Injectable is an equivalent bone grafting substitute to autologous bone graft in applications as shown by superiority analysis for safety and non-inferiority analysis for effectiveness STUDY RATIONALE: To evaluate a fully synthetic bone graft material to facilitate fusion in conditions or injuries requiring bone graft in a representative clinical fusion model and thus the opportunity to provide equivalent union rates as Autologous Bone Graft without necessitating an additional invasive procedure to harvest the graft

Detailed description

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, controlled, non-inferiority, multi-center trial NUMBER OF STUDY CENTERS: 25 NUMBER OF SUBJECTS: 299 Subjects (see Study Population). The subject population included subjects enrolled in 3 separate Clinical Trials. (BMTI-2006-01, BMTI-2009-01, and BMTI-2010-01) STUDY POPULATION: Male and female subjects 18 years of age or older requiring a hindfoot fusion procedure involving a bone grafting procedure. TREATMENT GROUPS: Group I: Standard Rigid Fixation + Autologous Bone Graft Group II: Standard Rigid Fixation + Augment® Injectable Bone Graft Subjects will be randomized in a 2:1 ratio (Augment® Injectable:Autologous Bone Graft). ROUTE OF ADMINISTRATION: Investigational device is manually implanted inside and around the fusion space to ensure Augment® Injectable Bone Graft (beta-TCP/bovine collagen matrix +rhPDGF-BB) or autologous bone graft is contained within the joint space STUDY DURATION: Twenty-four month follow-up post-surgery

Interventions

Implantation of up to 9cc of Augment® Injectable Bone Graft

Implantation of up to 9cc of autologous bone graft

Sponsors

BioMimetic Therapeutics
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

KEY INCLUSION CRITERIA: * at least 18 years old and considered skeletally mature * diagnosed with degenerative joint disease (DJD) affecting the hindfoot due to a congenital or acquired deformity, osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, post- traumatic arthritis or ankylosing spondylitis of the ankle, subtalar, calcaneocuboid, and/or talonavicular joints * requires one of the following hindfoot fusion proceduress with supplemental bone graft/substitute: ankle fusion (tibiotalar), subtalar fusion (talocalcaneal), calcaneocuboid fusion, talonavicular fusion, triple arthrodesis (subtalar, talonavicular and calcaneocuboid joints) OR double fusions (any combination of any two of the following: subtalar, talonavicular and calcaneocuboid joints) * fusion site able to be rigidly stabilized with no more than 3 screws across the fusion site * supplemental pins or staples allowed * supplemental screws external to the fusion site(s) allowed * signed informed consent document, independent, ambulatory, and can comply with all post-operative evaluations and visits KEY

Exclusion criteria

* undergone previous fusion surgery at the proposed location, i.e., revision of a failed fusion * more than one previous procedure at the involved joints * retained hardware spanning the joint(s) intended for fusion * procedure anticipated to require plate fixation (including claw plates), IM nails or more than 3 screws to achieve rigid fixation based on pre-op planning * procedure expected to require more than 9cc of graft material based on pre-op planning * procedure expected to require structural bone graft, allograft, bone graft substitute, platelet rich plasma (PRP) or bone marrow aspirate * procedure expected to require a pantalar fusion, i.e., fusion of ankle plus all hindfoot joints (talonavicular, subtalar, and calcaneocuboid) or an ankle fusion in combination with any hindfoot fusion * radiographic evidence of bone cysts, segmental defects or growth plate fracture near the fusion site that could negatively impact the proposed fusion procedure * tested positive or been treated for a malignancy in the past or is suspected of having a malignancy or currently undergoing radio- or chemotherapy treatment for a malignancy anywhere in the body, whether adjacent to or distant from the proposed surgical site * pre-existing sensory impairment, e.g., diabetics with baseline sensory impairment, which limits ability to perform objective functional measurements and may be at risk for complications \- diabetics not sensitive to the 5.07 monofilament (Semmes-Weinstein) are to be excluded * metabolic disorder known to adversely affect the skeleton other than primary osteoporosis or diabetes, e.g., renal osteodystrophy or hypercalcemia * use of chronic medications known to affect the skeleton, e.g., glucocorticoid usage \> 10mg/day * pre-fracture neuromuscular or musculoskeletal deficiency which limits the ability to perform objective functional measurements * physically or mentally compromised, e.g., current treatment for a psychiatric disorder, senile dementia, Alzheimer's disease, etc., to the extent that the Investigator judges the subject to be unable or unlikely to remain compliant * allergic to yeast-derived products or bovine collagen or other bovine-sourced products * received an investigational therapy within 30 days of proposed surgery or during the follow-up phase of the study * is a prisoner, known or suspected transient or a history of drug/alcohol abuse within the 12 months prior to screening * pregnant or intending to become pregnant within 12 months of the study procedure * morbidly obese defined as BMI \> 45 kg/m2 * currently has an acute infection at the surgical site

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain on Weight BearingBaseline, 9, 12, 16, 24, 36, and 52 weeksSubjects were asked to stand and report pain on a 100 mm Visual Analog Scale (with 0 being no pain and 100 being worst pain imaginable).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
SF-12 Physical Component ScoreBaseline, 9, 12, 16, 24, 36, and 52 weeksThe SF-12 Physical Component Score is a validated quality of life metric with a minimum of zero and a maximum of 100, with higher scores denoting higher quality of life.
Foot Function Index (FFI)Baseline, 9, 12, 16, 24, 36, and 52 weeksThe Foot Function Index (FFI) measures the impact of foot pathology on function in terms of pain, disability and activity restriction. The FFI is a self-administered index consisting of 23 items divided into 3 sub-scales all ranging from 0-100. To obtain a sub-scale score, the item scores for a sub-scale are totaled and then divided by the maximum total possible for all of the sub-scale items which the subject indicated were applicable. Any item marked as not applicable is excluded from the total possible. Sub-scales are an average of the completed ratings within that sub-scale. The total foot function score is an average of the three sub-scale scores and ranges from 0-100. Lower scores are indicative of better outcomes whereas higher scores indicate greater impairment.
AOFAS Hindfoot and Ankle ScoreBaseline, 9, 12, 16, 24, 36, and 52 weeksSubjects were asked to report pain, functionality and ability levels while the physician performed assessments based on alignment, abnormality, motion, and stability. The total score ranges from a low of zero to a high of 100, with subscales measuring pain (40 points), function (50 points), and alignment (10 points), with higher scores showing better outcomes.
Fusion Site PainBaseline, 9, 12, 16, 24, 36, and 52 weeksSubjects were asked to report current pain level at the fusion site on a 100 mm Visual Analog Scale (with 0 being no pain and 100 being worst pain imaginable).

Countries

Canada, United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

A propensity score matching analysis was performed in order to identify a single set of investigational and control subjects derived from the datasets (BMTI-2006-01, BMTI-2009-01, BMTI-2010-01) that were comparable and could be evaluated for the purpose of assessing the safety and effectiveness of AUGMENT® Injectable.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Augment® Injectable Bone Graft
Standard rigid fixation + Augment® Injectable Bone Graft (beta-TCP/bovine collagen matrix + rhPDGF-BB) Augment® Injectable Bone Graft: Implantation of up to 9cc of Augment® Injectable Bone Graft
132
Autologous Bone Graft
Standard Rigid Fixation + Autologous bone graft Autologous bone graft: Implantation of up to 9cc of autologous bone graft
167
Total299

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalAutologous Bone GraftAugment® Injectable Bone Graft
Affected Foot/Ankle
Ankle fusion
77 Participants46 Participants31 Participants
Affected Foot/Ankle
Calcaneocuboid fusion
3 Participants0 Participants3 Participants
Affected Foot/Ankle
Double fusion
38 Participants17 Participants21 Participants
Affected Foot/Ankle
Subtalar fusion
111 Participants59 Participants52 Participants
Affected Foot/Ankle
Talonavicular fusion
15 Participants9 Participants6 Participants
Affected Foot/Ankle
Triple arthordesis
55 Participants36 Participants19 Participants
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
93 Participants58 Participants35 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
206 Participants109 Participants97 Participants
Ever smoked
No
144 Participants83 Participants61 Participants
Ever smoked
Yes
155 Participants84 Participants71 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
143 Participants81 Participants62 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
156 Participants86 Participants70 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 1320 / 167
other
Total, other adverse events
116 / 132135 / 167
serious
Total, serious adverse events
20 / 13235 / 167

Outcome results

Primary

Pain on Weight Bearing

Subjects were asked to stand and report pain on a 100 mm Visual Analog Scale (with 0 being no pain and 100 being worst pain imaginable).

Time frame: Baseline, 9, 12, 16, 24, 36, and 52 weeks

Population: Analysis conducted on patients at Baseline, 9, 12, 16, 24, 36, and 52 weeks time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Augment® Injectable Bone GraftPain on Weight BearingWeek 5216.6 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.4
Augment® Injectable Bone GraftPain on Weight BearingWeek 1626.4 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.4
Augment® Injectable Bone GraftPain on Weight BearingWeek 929.5 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.9
Augment® Injectable Bone GraftPain on Weight BearingWeek 2425.1 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.4
Augment® Injectable Bone GraftPain on Weight BearingBaseline71.0 units on a scaleStandard Error 2
Augment® Injectable Bone GraftPain on Weight BearingWeek 3618.7 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.3
Augment® Injectable Bone GraftPain on Weight BearingWeek 1226.8 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.5
Autologous Bone GraftPain on Weight BearingWeek 5215.9 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.1
Autologous Bone GraftPain on Weight BearingBaseline70.7 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.8
Autologous Bone GraftPain on Weight BearingWeek 928.2 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.5
Autologous Bone GraftPain on Weight BearingWeek 1224.6 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.2
Autologous Bone GraftPain on Weight BearingWeek 1624.4 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.1
Autologous Bone GraftPain on Weight BearingWeek 2418.3 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.1
Autologous Bone GraftPain on Weight BearingWeek 3615.8 units on a scaleStandard Error 2
Secondary

AOFAS Hindfoot and Ankle Score

Subjects were asked to report pain, functionality and ability levels while the physician performed assessments based on alignment, abnormality, motion, and stability. The total score ranges from a low of zero to a high of 100, with subscales measuring pain (40 points), function (50 points), and alignment (10 points), with higher scores showing better outcomes.

Time frame: Baseline, 9, 12, 16, 24, 36, and 52 weeks

Population: Analysis conducted on patients at Baseline, 9, 12, 16, 24, 36, and 52 weeks time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Augment® Injectable Bone GraftAOFAS Hindfoot and Ankle Score12 Weeks66.9 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.3
Augment® Injectable Bone GraftAOFAS Hindfoot and Ankle Score24 Weeks73.4 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.5
Augment® Injectable Bone GraftAOFAS Hindfoot and Ankle Score9 Weeks61.5 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.1
Augment® Injectable Bone GraftAOFAS Hindfoot and Ankle Score36 Weeks77.5 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.5
Augment® Injectable Bone GraftAOFAS Hindfoot and Ankle Score16 Weeks69.9 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.3
Augment® Injectable Bone GraftAOFAS Hindfoot and Ankle Score52 Weeks79.5 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.6
Augment® Injectable Bone GraftAOFAS Hindfoot and Ankle ScoreBaseline43.3 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.5
Autologous Bone GraftAOFAS Hindfoot and Ankle Score52 Weeks79.3 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.4
Autologous Bone GraftAOFAS Hindfoot and Ankle ScoreBaseline43.6 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.3
Autologous Bone GraftAOFAS Hindfoot and Ankle Score9 Weeks61.5 units on a scaleStandard Error 1
Autologous Bone GraftAOFAS Hindfoot and Ankle Score12 Weeks66.6 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.1
Autologous Bone GraftAOFAS Hindfoot and Ankle Score16 Weeks71.2 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.1
Autologous Bone GraftAOFAS Hindfoot and Ankle Score24 Weeks75.5 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.3
Autologous Bone GraftAOFAS Hindfoot and Ankle Score36 Weeks78.9 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.3
Secondary

Foot Function Index (FFI)

The Foot Function Index (FFI) measures the impact of foot pathology on function in terms of pain, disability and activity restriction. The FFI is a self-administered index consisting of 23 items divided into 3 sub-scales all ranging from 0-100. To obtain a sub-scale score, the item scores for a sub-scale are totaled and then divided by the maximum total possible for all of the sub-scale items which the subject indicated were applicable. Any item marked as not applicable is excluded from the total possible. Sub-scales are an average of the completed ratings within that sub-scale. The total foot function score is an average of the three sub-scale scores and ranges from 0-100. Lower scores are indicative of better outcomes whereas higher scores indicate greater impairment.

Time frame: Baseline, 9, 12, 16, 24, 36, and 52 weeks

Population: Analysis conducted on patients at Baseline, 9, 12, 16, 24, 36, and 52 weeks time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Augment® Injectable Bone GraftFoot Function Index (FFI)12 Weeks33.3 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.8
Augment® Injectable Bone GraftFoot Function Index (FFI)24 Weeks26.3 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.8
Augment® Injectable Bone GraftFoot Function Index (FFI)9 Weeks41.8 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.7
Augment® Injectable Bone GraftFoot Function Index (FFI)36 Weeks21.8 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.8
Augment® Injectable Bone GraftFoot Function Index (FFI)16 Weeks29.7 units on a scaleStandard Error 2
Augment® Injectable Bone GraftFoot Function Index (FFI)52 Weeks19.6 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.9
Augment® Injectable Bone GraftFoot Function Index (FFI)Baseline50.6 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.6
Autologous Bone GraftFoot Function Index (FFI)52 Weeks16.9 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.6
Autologous Bone GraftFoot Function Index (FFI)Baseline50.0 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.4
Autologous Bone GraftFoot Function Index (FFI)9 Weeks45.0 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.5
Autologous Bone GraftFoot Function Index (FFI)12 Weeks34.5 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.6
Autologous Bone GraftFoot Function Index (FFI)16 Weeks28.0 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.7
Autologous Bone GraftFoot Function Index (FFI)24 Weeks19.8 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.6
Autologous Bone GraftFoot Function Index (FFI)36 Weeks16.7 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.6
Secondary

Fusion Site Pain

Subjects were asked to report current pain level at the fusion site on a 100 mm Visual Analog Scale (with 0 being no pain and 100 being worst pain imaginable).

Time frame: Baseline, 9, 12, 16, 24, 36, and 52 weeks

Population: Analysis conducted on patients at Baseline, 9, 12, 16, 24, 36, and 52 weeks time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Augment® Injectable Bone GraftFusion Site PainWeek 1218.9 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.1
Augment® Injectable Bone GraftFusion Site PainWeek 2420.9 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.2
Augment® Injectable Bone GraftFusion Site PainWeek 920.5 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.1
Augment® Injectable Bone GraftFusion Site PainWeek 3617.4 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.1
Augment® Injectable Bone GraftFusion Site PainWeek 1621.7 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.2
Augment® Injectable Bone GraftFusion Site PainWeek 5215.8 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.2
Augment® Injectable Bone GraftFusion Site PainBaseline51.4 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.4
Autologous Bone GraftFusion Site PainWeek 5212.6 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.9
Autologous Bone GraftFusion Site PainBaseline50.4 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.1
Autologous Bone GraftFusion Site PainWeek 915.4 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.8
Autologous Bone GraftFusion Site PainWeek 1217.8 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.8
Autologous Bone GraftFusion Site PainWeek 1618.9 units on a scaleStandard Error 2
Autologous Bone GraftFusion Site PainWeek 2415.3 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.9
Autologous Bone GraftFusion Site PainWeek 3612.4 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.8
Secondary

SF-12 Physical Component Score

The SF-12 Physical Component Score is a validated quality of life metric with a minimum of zero and a maximum of 100, with higher scores denoting higher quality of life.

Time frame: Baseline, 9, 12, 16, 24, 36, and 52 weeks

Population: Analysis conducted on patients at Baseline, 12, 16, 24, 36, and 52 weeks time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Augment® Injectable Bone GraftSF-12 Physical Component ScoreBaseline30.8 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.8
Augment® Injectable Bone GraftSF-12 Physical Component ScoreWeek 1236.9 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.8
Augment® Injectable Bone GraftSF-12 Physical Component ScoreWeek 1637.9 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.8
Augment® Injectable Bone GraftSF-12 Physical Component ScoreWeek 2440.3 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.9
Augment® Injectable Bone GraftSF-12 Physical Component ScoreWeek 3642.1 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.9
Augment® Injectable Bone GraftSF-12 Physical Component ScoreWeek 5242.9 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.9
Autologous Bone GraftSF-12 Physical Component ScoreWeek 3644.5 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.8
Autologous Bone GraftSF-12 Physical Component ScoreBaseline30.8 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.7
Autologous Bone GraftSF-12 Physical Component ScoreWeek 2442.2 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.7
Autologous Bone GraftSF-12 Physical Component ScoreWeek 1236.3 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.7
Autologous Bone GraftSF-12 Physical Component ScoreWeek 5245.5 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.8
Autologous Bone GraftSF-12 Physical Component ScoreWeek 1639.0 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.7

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026