Skip to content

This Study is Designed to Evaluate PD/PK and Safety of Replagal Manufactured by Two Different Processes.

A Phase II Comparability Study Between Replagal® Produced From Agalsidase Alfa Manufactured by 2 Different Processes in Adult Male Patients With Fabry Disease

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01304277
Enrollment
17
Registered
2011-02-25
Start date
2011-11-17
Completion date
2012-12-28
Last updated
2021-07-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Fabry Disease

Keywords

Replagal

Brief summary

This study is designed to evaluate safety and PK/PD in Canadian Fabry patients.

Detailed description

In 2008, a change in the agalsidase alfa drug substance manufacturing process was made. There are no changes to the drug product formulation, manufacturing site, manufacturing process, or container closure. An agalsidase alfa bioreactor manufacturing process (agalAF1) utilizing animal component-free media replaced the previous roller bottle (RB) process. This study is designed to provide PD/PK and safety data. The assessment schedule is designed to capture the PK profile of drug uptake in the blood as well the pharmacologic effect which manifests over the course of weeks. Each patient will serve as his own control.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALagalsidase alfa

Sponsors

Shire
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. The patient must be diagnosed with Fabry disease using the following criteria: The patient is a hemizygous male with Fabry disease as confirmed by a deficiency of α-galactosidase A activity measured in serum, leukocytes, or fibroblasts or has a confirmed mutation of the α-galactosidase A gene. 2. Patient is male and between 18 and 65 years of age, inclusive. 3. Patient must be willing to remain in the clinic as required by the study and comply with the procedures and evaluations of the study. 4. At the time of confirmation of study eligibility visit, patients must have received at least 26 weeks of treatment with RB Replagal at a dose of 0.2 mg/kg administered IV EOW. 5. Patient provides informed consent. Patients who are naive to ERT: 1\. Treatment naive patients must have a pretreatment plasma Gb3 level above the normal range (if value is available).

Exclusion criteria

1. Patient is unable to be venipunctured and/or tolerate venous access. 2. Patient has tested positive for anti-agalsidase alfa antibodies either at screening or confirmation of eligibility visit. 3. Patient had pre-ERT plasma Gb3 levels within the normal range (if value is available). 4. Patient is participating in any other Shire HGT investigational study. 5. Patient is currently on dialysis, is expected to begin dialysis during the study, has received a kidney transplant, or is on the renal transplant waiting list. 6. Patient is unable to comply with the protocol (eg, clinical relevant medical condition making implementation of the protocol difficult, unstable social situation, or otherwise unlikely to complete the study) or is, in the opinion of the Investigator, otherwise unsuited for the study. 7. The patient is enrolled in another clinical study that involves clinical investigations or use of any investigational product (drug or device), except for the Canadian Fabry Disease Initiative, within 6 months prior to receiving the first dose of AF Replagal in this study or at any time during the study. 8. The patient has previously received AF Replagal prior to study entry.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Change From Baseline to Week 16 (EOS) in Urine Gb3 LevelsBaseline to EOS

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Dose-normalized Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to the Time of the Last Quantifiable Sample (AUClast/Dose)Week 0 to Week 14The dose-normalized calculation was performed by dividing the pharmacokinetic parameter by the administered dose.
Dose-normalized AUC Extrapolated to Infinity (AUC∞/Dose)Week 0 to Week 14The dose-normalized calculation was performed by dividing the pharmacokinetic parameter by the administered dose.
Change From Baseline to Week 16 (EOS) in Plasma Gb3 LevelsBaseline to EOS
To Assess Safety and Tolerability by Anti-agalsidase Alfa Antibody Status (in Serum) at End of StudyEOS
Overall Summary of TEAEs by Treatment (Replagal RB and Replagal AF)Week 2 to EOSTo Assess Safety and Tolerability by Anti-agalsidase Alfa Antibody Status, concomitant medication, vital signs and ECG.
Dose-normalized Maximum Serum Concentration (Cmax/Dose)Week 0 to Week 14The dose-normalized calculation was performed by dividing the pharmacokinetic parameter by the administered dose.

Countries

Canada

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The first patient participated in the study on 06 December 2011 and the last patient completed the study procedures on 28 December 2012.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Replagal® (0.2 mg/kg, EOW)
Patients who had received Replagal RB for at least 26 weeks prior to entering the study REP-082, received 1 dose of Replagal RB at baseline before switching to Replagal AF. They then received 14 weeks of treatment with Replagal AF.
17
Total17

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicReplagal® (0.2 mg/kg, EOW)
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
17 Participants
Age, Continuous39.8 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.589
Region of Enrollment
CANADA
17 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
17 Participants
Study Specific Characteristic [Plasma Gb3]5.276 nmol/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.562
Study Specific Characteristic [Urine Gb3]919.27 nmol/g creatinine
STANDARD_DEVIATION 990.144

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
12 / 17
serious
Total, serious adverse events
2 / 17

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline to Week 16 (EOS) in Urine Gb3 Levels

Time frame: Baseline to EOS

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Replagal® (0.2 mg/kg, EOW)Change From Baseline to Week 16 (EOS) in Urine Gb3 Levels-28.68 (nmol/g creatinine)Standard Deviation 192.659
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 16 (EOS) in Plasma Gb3 Levels

Time frame: Baseline to EOS

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Replagal® (0.2 mg/kg, EOW)Change From Baseline to Week 16 (EOS) in Plasma Gb3 Levels0.170 (nmol/mL)Standard Deviation 0.503
Secondary

Dose-normalized Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to the Time of the Last Quantifiable Sample (AUClast/Dose)

The dose-normalized calculation was performed by dividing the pharmacokinetic parameter by the administered dose.

Time frame: Week 0 to Week 14

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
Replagal® (0.2 mg/kg, EOW)Dose-normalized Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to the Time of the Last Quantifiable Sample (AUClast/Dose)Week 14 versus 00.65 Ratio
Replagal® (0.2 mg/kg, EOW)Dose-normalized Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to the Time of the Last Quantifiable Sample (AUClast/Dose)Week 14 versus 21.05 Ratio
Secondary

Dose-normalized AUC Extrapolated to Infinity (AUC∞/Dose)

The dose-normalized calculation was performed by dividing the pharmacokinetic parameter by the administered dose.

Time frame: Week 0 to Week 14

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
Replagal® (0.2 mg/kg, EOW)Dose-normalized AUC Extrapolated to Infinity (AUC∞/Dose)Week 14 versus 00.67 Ratio
Replagal® (0.2 mg/kg, EOW)Dose-normalized AUC Extrapolated to Infinity (AUC∞/Dose)Week 14 versus 21.07 Ratio
Secondary

Dose-normalized Maximum Serum Concentration (Cmax/Dose)

The dose-normalized calculation was performed by dividing the pharmacokinetic parameter by the administered dose.

Time frame: Week 0 to Week 14

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
Replagal® (0.2 mg/kg, EOW)Dose-normalized Maximum Serum Concentration (Cmax/Dose)Week 14 versus 00.81 Ratio
Replagal® (0.2 mg/kg, EOW)Dose-normalized Maximum Serum Concentration (Cmax/Dose)Week 14 versus 21.05 Ratio
Secondary

Overall Summary of TEAEs by Treatment (Replagal RB and Replagal AF)

To Assess Safety and Tolerability by Anti-agalsidase Alfa Antibody Status, concomitant medication, vital signs and ECG.

Time frame: Week 2 to EOS

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Replagal® (0.2 mg/kg, EOW)Overall Summary of TEAEs by Treatment (Replagal RB and Replagal AF)No TEAE9 participants
Replagal® (0.2 mg/kg, EOW)Overall Summary of TEAEs by Treatment (Replagal RB and Replagal AF)Experienced at least one TEAE8 participants
Replagal® (0.2 mg/kg, EOW)Overall Summary of TEAEs by Treatment (Replagal RB and Replagal AF)Deaths0 participants
Replagal® (0.2 mg/kg, EOW)Overall Summary of TEAEs by Treatment (Replagal RB and Replagal AF)Discontinued due to a TEAE0 participants
Replagal® (0.2 mg/kg, EOW)Overall Summary of TEAEs by Treatment (Replagal RB and Replagal AF)Experienced at least one drug-related TEAE3 participants
Replagal® (0.2 mg/kg, EOW)Overall Summary of TEAEs by Treatment (Replagal RB and Replagal AF)Experienced at least one SAE0 participants
Replagal® (0.2 mg/kg, EOW)Overall Summary of TEAEs by Treatment (Replagal RB and Replagal AF)At least one severe or life- threatening TEAE1 participants
Replagal® (0.2 mg/kg, EOW)Overall Summary of TEAEs by Treatment (Replagal RB and Replagal AF)At least one IRR (infusion related reaction)1 participants
Replagal AFOverall Summary of TEAEs by Treatment (Replagal RB and Replagal AF)Deaths0 participants
Replagal AFOverall Summary of TEAEs by Treatment (Replagal RB and Replagal AF)At least one severe or life- threatening TEAE1 participants
Replagal AFOverall Summary of TEAEs by Treatment (Replagal RB and Replagal AF)Discontinued due to a TEAE0 participants
Replagal AFOverall Summary of TEAEs by Treatment (Replagal RB and Replagal AF)Experienced at least one drug-related TEAE3 participants
Replagal AFOverall Summary of TEAEs by Treatment (Replagal RB and Replagal AF)Experienced at least one SAE2 participants
Replagal AFOverall Summary of TEAEs by Treatment (Replagal RB and Replagal AF)No TEAE5 participants
Replagal AFOverall Summary of TEAEs by Treatment (Replagal RB and Replagal AF)Experienced at least one TEAE12 participants
Replagal AFOverall Summary of TEAEs by Treatment (Replagal RB and Replagal AF)At least one IRR (infusion related reaction)1 participants
OverallOverall Summary of TEAEs by Treatment (Replagal RB and Replagal AF)Deaths0 participants
OverallOverall Summary of TEAEs by Treatment (Replagal RB and Replagal AF)Experienced at least one TEAE12 participants
OverallOverall Summary of TEAEs by Treatment (Replagal RB and Replagal AF)No TEAE5 participants
OverallOverall Summary of TEAEs by Treatment (Replagal RB and Replagal AF)Discontinued due to a TEAE0 participants
OverallOverall Summary of TEAEs by Treatment (Replagal RB and Replagal AF)At least one severe or life- threatening TEAE1 participants
OverallOverall Summary of TEAEs by Treatment (Replagal RB and Replagal AF)Experienced at least one SAE2 participants
OverallOverall Summary of TEAEs by Treatment (Replagal RB and Replagal AF)Experienced at least one drug-related TEAE3 participants
OverallOverall Summary of TEAEs by Treatment (Replagal RB and Replagal AF)At least one IRR (infusion related reaction)1 participants
Secondary

To Assess Safety and Tolerability by Anti-agalsidase Alfa Antibody Status (in Serum) at End of Study

Time frame: EOS

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Replagal® (0.2 mg/kg, EOW)To Assess Safety and Tolerability by Anti-agalsidase Alfa Antibody Status (in Serum) at End of StudyAnti-Agalsidase alfa Antibody Positive (IgG)2 participants
Replagal® (0.2 mg/kg, EOW)To Assess Safety and Tolerability by Anti-agalsidase Alfa Antibody Status (in Serum) at End of StudyAnti-Agalsidase alfa Antibody Positive (IgM)2 participants
Replagal® (0.2 mg/kg, EOW)To Assess Safety and Tolerability by Anti-agalsidase Alfa Antibody Status (in Serum) at End of StudyAnti-Agalsidase alfa Antibody Negative13 participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026