Skip to content

Retrospective Registry of Patients With Acute Heparin-induced Thrombocytopenia Type II

Systematische Dokumentation Von Patienten Mit Akutem HIT-Verdacht

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01304238
Enrollment
195
Registered
2011-02-25
Start date
2009-02-28
Completion date
2010-01-31
Last updated
2017-07-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute HIT II (Heparin-induced Thrombocytopenia Type II)

Keywords

Retrospective evaluation of patients with acute Heparin-induced Thrombocytopenia type II treated with Fondaparinux

Brief summary

The purpose of this retrospective registry is to collect data about patients with acute HIT II (Heparin-induced Thrombocytopenia type II) which were treated with Lepirudin, Danaparoid, Argatroban or Fondaparinux. It is a main objective of this registry to mirror the daily routine in this indication in Germany.

Interventions

lepirudin

DRUGdanaparoid

danaparoid

DRUGargatroban

argatroban

DRUGfondaparinux

fondaparinux

Sponsors

GlaxoSmithKline
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Acute HIT II (Heparin-induced Thrombocytopenia type II), 4T-Score * Treatment of HIT with Lepirudin, Danaparoid, Argatroban or Fondaparinux

Exclusion criteria

\-

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants Diagnosed With Thrombosis and/or Pulmonary Embolism After the Occurrence of HIT II19 January 2005 to 25 October 2009Thrombosis is a clotting in a blood vessel. Pulmonary embolism is a clot, usually from the deep veins of the legs, carried away with the venous bloodstream into the lungs, where it may block pulmonary vessels. Participants' medical records were used to abstract data that were collected on standardized hard copy Case Report Forms (CRFs).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants Diagnosed With Bleeding After the Occurrence of HIT II19 January 2005 to 25 October 2009Participants' medical records were used to abstract data that were collected on standardized hard copy Case Report Forms (CRFs). Bleeding was documented in the participant files.
Number of Participants With Fatal Complications After the Occurrence of HIT II19 January 2005 to 25 October 2009Participants' medical records were used to abstract data that were collected on standardized hard copy Case Report Forms (CRFs). A fatal complication is defined as a complication resulting in death.
Number of Participants Who Underwent Amputation After the Occurrence of HIT II19 January 2005 to 25 October 2009Participants' medical records were used to abstract data that were collected on standardized hard copy Case Report Forms (CRFs).
Number of Participants Who Were Diagnosed With Thrombocytopenia (Recurrent of Persistent) After the Occurrence of HIT II19 January 2005 to 25 October 2009Participants' medical records were used to abstract data that were collected on standardized hard copy Case Report Forms (CRFs). Thrombocytopenia after HIT-II was documented in the participant files.
Number of Participants Who Experienced Skin Changes (Erythema and Necrosis) After the Occurrence of HIT II19 January 2005 to 25 October 2009Participants' medical records were used to abstract data that were collected on standardized hard copy Case Report Forms (CRFs). Erythema is a redness of the skin caused by hyperemia. Necrosis is the premature death of cells or tissues.

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Argatroban
Participants treated with argatroban after Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Type-II (HIT II)
32
Lepirudin
Participants treated with lepirudin after HIT II
4
Danaparoid
Participants treated with danaparoid after HIT II
46
Fondaparinux
Participants treated with fondaparinux after HIT II
78
Argatroban/Fondaparinux
Participants treated with argatroban and fondaparinux after HIT II
11
Danaparoid/Argatroban
Participants treated with danaparoid and argatroban after HIT II
11
Danaparoid/Fondaparinux
Participants treated with danaparoid and fondaparinux after HIT II
5
Danaparoid/Lepirudin
Participants treated with danaparoid and lepirudin after HIT II
4
Danaparoid/Fondaparinux/Lepirudin
Participants treated with danaparoid, fondaparinux, and lepirudin after HIT II
1
Argatroban/Danaparoid/Fondaparinux
Participants treated with argatroban, danaparoid, and fondaparinux after HIT II
3
Total195

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicDanaparoidArgatrobanTotalArgatroban/Danaparoid/FondaparinuxDanaparoid/Fondaparinux/LepirudinDanaparoid/LepirudinDanaparoid/FondaparinuxDanaparoid/ArgatrobanArgatroban/FondaparinuxFondaparinuxLepirudin
Age, Continuous67.8 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13
66.4 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.3
68.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.5
63.7 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.5
56.0 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0
55.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16
71.0 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.6
60.0 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14
71.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.1
71.7 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.4
61.8 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.7
Number of participants receiving the indicated AT before HIT II with regard to rationale
Prophylactic
39 participants24 participants155 participants2 participants0 participants3 participants2 participants8 participants9 participants66 participants2 participants
Number of participants receiving the indicated AT before HIT II with regard to rationale
Therapeutic
18 participants14 participants76 participants3 participants1 participants2 participants3 participants6 participants6 participants21 participants2 participants
Number of participants receiving the indicated heparin treatment prior to HIT II
Only low molecular weight heparin (LMWH)
10 participants2 participants24 participants1 participants1 participants2 participants3 participants0 participants1 participants3 participants1 participants
Number of participants receiving the indicated heparin treatment prior to HIT II
Only unfractionated heparin (UFH)
24 participants19 participants109 participants1 participants0 participants0 participants1 participants7 participants3 participants53 participants1 participants
Number of participants receiving the indicated heparin treatment prior to HIT II
UFH and LMWH
12 participants11 participants62 participants1 participants0 participants2 participants1 participants4 participants7 participants22 participants2 participants
Number of participants receving the indicated AT before HIT II (specified) with regard to rationale
Indication for thromboembolic therapy
18 participants14 participants76 participants3 participants1 participants2 participants3 participants6 participants6 participants21 participants2 participants
Number of participants receving the indicated AT before HIT II (specified) with regard to rationale
Prophylaxis: Internal Medicine
27 participants13 participants55 participants2 participants0 participants1 participants1 participants5 participants2 participants4 participants0 participants
Number of participants receving the indicated AT before HIT II (specified) with regard to rationale
Prophylaxis: Neurology/Neurosurgery
10 participants2 participants14 participants0 participants0 participants0 participants1 participants0 participants1 participants0 participants0 participants
Number of participants receving the indicated AT before HIT II (specified) with regard to rationale
Prophylaxis (no further specification)
0 participants2 participants5 participants0 participants0 participants0 participants0 participants1 participants1 participants1 participants0 participants
Number of participants receving the indicated AT before HIT II (specified) with regard to rationale
Prophylaxis: Surgery
11 participants12 participants102 participants0 participants0 participants3 participants1 participants5 participants6 participants62 participants2 participants
Number of participants with the indicated thromboembolic therapy (specified)
Acute coronary syndrome
3 participants1 participants12 participants0 participants0 participants1 participants0 participants2 participants0 participants4 participants1 participants
Number of participants with the indicated thromboembolic therapy (specified)
Alternative anticoagulation in atrial fibrillation
9 participants4 participants31 participants2 participants0 participants0 participants2 participants0 participants1 participants13 participants0 participants
Number of participants with the indicated thromboembolic therapy (specified)
Alternative anticoagulation in cardiac valve
0 participants1 participants4 participants0 participants0 participants0 participants0 participants0 participants0 participants3 participants0 participants
Number of participants with the indicated thromboembolic therapy (specified)
Deep vein thrombosis
2 participants5 participants14 participants1 participants0 participants0 participants0 participants2 participants2 participants2 participants0 participants
Number of participants with the indicated thromboembolic therapy (specified)
Other
3 participants3 participants14 participants0 participants1 participants0 participants0 participants4 participants2 participants0 participants1 participants
Number of participants with the indicated thromboembolic therapy (specified)
Peripheral artery occlusive disease
1 participants0 participants3 participants0 participants0 participants0 participants1 participants0 participants0 participants1 participants0 participants
Number of participants with the indicated thromboembolic therapy (specified)
Pulmonary embolism
1 participants4 participants12 participants1 participants0 participants1 participants0 participants1 participants3 participants1 participants0 participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Female
21 Participants10 Participants84 Participants2 Participants1 Participants2 Participants2 Participants5 Participants5 Participants35 Participants1 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Male
25 Participants22 Participants110 Participants1 Participants0 Participants2 Participants3 Participants6 Participants6 Participants43 Participants2 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
EG006
affected / at risk
EG007
affected / at risk
EG008
affected / at risk
EG009
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 0
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 0

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants Diagnosed With Thrombosis and/or Pulmonary Embolism After the Occurrence of HIT II

Thrombosis is a clotting in a blood vessel. Pulmonary embolism is a clot, usually from the deep veins of the legs, carried away with the venous bloodstream into the lungs, where it may block pulmonary vessels. Participants' medical records were used to abstract data that were collected on standardized hard copy Case Report Forms (CRFs).

Time frame: 19 January 2005 to 25 October 2009

Population: All documented participants diagnosed with suspected acute HIT II and a 4T Score of ≥4 who had received at least one dose of argatroban, lepirudin, danaparoid, or fondaparinux. The 4T score (range: 0-8) was developed to predict the probability of HIT.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
ArgatrobanNumber of Participants Diagnosed With Thrombosis and/or Pulmonary Embolism After the Occurrence of HIT IIThrombosis and pulmonary embolism0 participants
ArgatrobanNumber of Participants Diagnosed With Thrombosis and/or Pulmonary Embolism After the Occurrence of HIT IIUnknown0 participants
ArgatrobanNumber of Participants Diagnosed With Thrombosis and/or Pulmonary Embolism After the Occurrence of HIT IIThrombosis31 participants
ArgatrobanNumber of Participants Diagnosed With Thrombosis and/or Pulmonary Embolism After the Occurrence of HIT IIPulmonary embolism0 participants
ArgatrobanNumber of Participants Diagnosed With Thrombosis and/or Pulmonary Embolism After the Occurrence of HIT IINo thrombosis or pulmonary embolism1 participants
LepirudinNumber of Participants Diagnosed With Thrombosis and/or Pulmonary Embolism After the Occurrence of HIT IINo thrombosis or pulmonary embolism0 participants
LepirudinNumber of Participants Diagnosed With Thrombosis and/or Pulmonary Embolism After the Occurrence of HIT IIUnknown0 participants
LepirudinNumber of Participants Diagnosed With Thrombosis and/or Pulmonary Embolism After the Occurrence of HIT IIPulmonary embolism0 participants
LepirudinNumber of Participants Diagnosed With Thrombosis and/or Pulmonary Embolism After the Occurrence of HIT IIThrombosis4 participants
LepirudinNumber of Participants Diagnosed With Thrombosis and/or Pulmonary Embolism After the Occurrence of HIT IIThrombosis and pulmonary embolism0 participants
DanaparoidNumber of Participants Diagnosed With Thrombosis and/or Pulmonary Embolism After the Occurrence of HIT IIUnknown0 participants
DanaparoidNumber of Participants Diagnosed With Thrombosis and/or Pulmonary Embolism After the Occurrence of HIT IIPulmonary embolism0 participants
DanaparoidNumber of Participants Diagnosed With Thrombosis and/or Pulmonary Embolism After the Occurrence of HIT IIThrombosis and pulmonary embolism0 participants
DanaparoidNumber of Participants Diagnosed With Thrombosis and/or Pulmonary Embolism After the Occurrence of HIT IINo thrombosis or pulmonary embolism1 participants
DanaparoidNumber of Participants Diagnosed With Thrombosis and/or Pulmonary Embolism After the Occurrence of HIT IIThrombosis45 participants
FondaparinuxNumber of Participants Diagnosed With Thrombosis and/or Pulmonary Embolism After the Occurrence of HIT IIPulmonary embolism0 participants
FondaparinuxNumber of Participants Diagnosed With Thrombosis and/or Pulmonary Embolism After the Occurrence of HIT IIThrombosis78 participants
FondaparinuxNumber of Participants Diagnosed With Thrombosis and/or Pulmonary Embolism After the Occurrence of HIT IINo thrombosis or pulmonary embolism0 participants
FondaparinuxNumber of Participants Diagnosed With Thrombosis and/or Pulmonary Embolism After the Occurrence of HIT IIThrombosis and pulmonary embolism0 participants
FondaparinuxNumber of Participants Diagnosed With Thrombosis and/or Pulmonary Embolism After the Occurrence of HIT IIUnknown0 participants
Argatroban/FondaparinuxNumber of Participants Diagnosed With Thrombosis and/or Pulmonary Embolism After the Occurrence of HIT IINo thrombosis or pulmonary embolism0 participants
Argatroban/FondaparinuxNumber of Participants Diagnosed With Thrombosis and/or Pulmonary Embolism After the Occurrence of HIT IIPulmonary embolism0 participants
Argatroban/FondaparinuxNumber of Participants Diagnosed With Thrombosis and/or Pulmonary Embolism After the Occurrence of HIT IIThrombosis11 participants
Argatroban/FondaparinuxNumber of Participants Diagnosed With Thrombosis and/or Pulmonary Embolism After the Occurrence of HIT IIThrombosis and pulmonary embolism0 participants
Argatroban/FondaparinuxNumber of Participants Diagnosed With Thrombosis and/or Pulmonary Embolism After the Occurrence of HIT IIUnknown0 participants
Danaparoid/ArgatrobanNumber of Participants Diagnosed With Thrombosis and/or Pulmonary Embolism After the Occurrence of HIT IIThrombosis and pulmonary embolism0 participants
Danaparoid/ArgatrobanNumber of Participants Diagnosed With Thrombosis and/or Pulmonary Embolism After the Occurrence of HIT IIThrombosis6 participants
Danaparoid/ArgatrobanNumber of Participants Diagnosed With Thrombosis and/or Pulmonary Embolism After the Occurrence of HIT IIPulmonary embolism1 participants
Danaparoid/ArgatrobanNumber of Participants Diagnosed With Thrombosis and/or Pulmonary Embolism After the Occurrence of HIT IINo thrombosis or pulmonary embolism4 participants
Danaparoid/ArgatrobanNumber of Participants Diagnosed With Thrombosis and/or Pulmonary Embolism After the Occurrence of HIT IIUnknown0 participants
Danaparoid/FondaparinuxNumber of Participants Diagnosed With Thrombosis and/or Pulmonary Embolism After the Occurrence of HIT IIThrombosis5 participants
Danaparoid/FondaparinuxNumber of Participants Diagnosed With Thrombosis and/or Pulmonary Embolism After the Occurrence of HIT IIUnknown0 participants
Danaparoid/FondaparinuxNumber of Participants Diagnosed With Thrombosis and/or Pulmonary Embolism After the Occurrence of HIT IIPulmonary embolism0 participants
Danaparoid/FondaparinuxNumber of Participants Diagnosed With Thrombosis and/or Pulmonary Embolism After the Occurrence of HIT IIThrombosis and pulmonary embolism0 participants
Danaparoid/FondaparinuxNumber of Participants Diagnosed With Thrombosis and/or Pulmonary Embolism After the Occurrence of HIT IINo thrombosis or pulmonary embolism0 participants
Danaparoid/LepirudinNumber of Participants Diagnosed With Thrombosis and/or Pulmonary Embolism After the Occurrence of HIT IIPulmonary embolism1 participants
Danaparoid/LepirudinNumber of Participants Diagnosed With Thrombosis and/or Pulmonary Embolism After the Occurrence of HIT IIUnknown0 participants
Danaparoid/LepirudinNumber of Participants Diagnosed With Thrombosis and/or Pulmonary Embolism After the Occurrence of HIT IINo thrombosis or pulmonary embolism2 participants
Danaparoid/LepirudinNumber of Participants Diagnosed With Thrombosis and/or Pulmonary Embolism After the Occurrence of HIT IIThrombosis and pulmonary embolism0 participants
Danaparoid/LepirudinNumber of Participants Diagnosed With Thrombosis and/or Pulmonary Embolism After the Occurrence of HIT IIThrombosis1 participants
Danaparoid/Fondaparinux/LepirudinNumber of Participants Diagnosed With Thrombosis and/or Pulmonary Embolism After the Occurrence of HIT IIUnknown0 participants
Danaparoid/Fondaparinux/LepirudinNumber of Participants Diagnosed With Thrombosis and/or Pulmonary Embolism After the Occurrence of HIT IIThrombosis and pulmonary embolism0 participants
Danaparoid/Fondaparinux/LepirudinNumber of Participants Diagnosed With Thrombosis and/or Pulmonary Embolism After the Occurrence of HIT IINo thrombosis or pulmonary embolism0 participants
Danaparoid/Fondaparinux/LepirudinNumber of Participants Diagnosed With Thrombosis and/or Pulmonary Embolism After the Occurrence of HIT IIPulmonary embolism0 participants
Danaparoid/Fondaparinux/LepirudinNumber of Participants Diagnosed With Thrombosis and/or Pulmonary Embolism After the Occurrence of HIT IIThrombosis1 participants
Argatroban/Danaparoid/FondaparinuxNumber of Participants Diagnosed With Thrombosis and/or Pulmonary Embolism After the Occurrence of HIT IIPulmonary embolism0 participants
Argatroban/Danaparoid/FondaparinuxNumber of Participants Diagnosed With Thrombosis and/or Pulmonary Embolism After the Occurrence of HIT IIThrombosis and pulmonary embolism0 participants
Argatroban/Danaparoid/FondaparinuxNumber of Participants Diagnosed With Thrombosis and/or Pulmonary Embolism After the Occurrence of HIT IIThrombosis3 participants
Argatroban/Danaparoid/FondaparinuxNumber of Participants Diagnosed With Thrombosis and/or Pulmonary Embolism After the Occurrence of HIT IIUnknown0 participants
Argatroban/Danaparoid/FondaparinuxNumber of Participants Diagnosed With Thrombosis and/or Pulmonary Embolism After the Occurrence of HIT IINo thrombosis or pulmonary embolism0 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Diagnosed With Bleeding After the Occurrence of HIT II

Participants' medical records were used to abstract data that were collected on standardized hard copy Case Report Forms (CRFs). Bleeding was documented in the participant files.

Time frame: 19 January 2005 to 25 October 2009

Population: All documented participants diagnosed with suspected acute HIT II and a 4T Score of ≥4 who had received at least one dose of argatroban, lepirudin, danaparoid, or fondaparinux. The 4T score (range: 0-8) was developed to predict the probability of HIT.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
ArgatrobanNumber of Participants Diagnosed With Bleeding After the Occurrence of HIT IINo Bleeding30 participants
ArgatrobanNumber of Participants Diagnosed With Bleeding After the Occurrence of HIT IIBleeding2 participants
LepirudinNumber of Participants Diagnosed With Bleeding After the Occurrence of HIT IIBleeding0 participants
LepirudinNumber of Participants Diagnosed With Bleeding After the Occurrence of HIT IINo Bleeding4 participants
DanaparoidNumber of Participants Diagnosed With Bleeding After the Occurrence of HIT IIBleeding3 participants
DanaparoidNumber of Participants Diagnosed With Bleeding After the Occurrence of HIT IINo Bleeding43 participants
FondaparinuxNumber of Participants Diagnosed With Bleeding After the Occurrence of HIT IINo Bleeding74 participants
FondaparinuxNumber of Participants Diagnosed With Bleeding After the Occurrence of HIT IIBleeding4 participants
Argatroban/FondaparinuxNumber of Participants Diagnosed With Bleeding After the Occurrence of HIT IINo Bleeding11 participants
Argatroban/FondaparinuxNumber of Participants Diagnosed With Bleeding After the Occurrence of HIT IIBleeding0 participants
Danaparoid/ArgatrobanNumber of Participants Diagnosed With Bleeding After the Occurrence of HIT IIBleeding3 participants
Danaparoid/ArgatrobanNumber of Participants Diagnosed With Bleeding After the Occurrence of HIT IINo Bleeding8 participants
Danaparoid/FondaparinuxNumber of Participants Diagnosed With Bleeding After the Occurrence of HIT IINo Bleeding5 participants
Danaparoid/FondaparinuxNumber of Participants Diagnosed With Bleeding After the Occurrence of HIT IIBleeding0 participants
Danaparoid/LepirudinNumber of Participants Diagnosed With Bleeding After the Occurrence of HIT IINo Bleeding2 participants
Danaparoid/LepirudinNumber of Participants Diagnosed With Bleeding After the Occurrence of HIT IIBleeding2 participants
Danaparoid/Fondaparinux/LepirudinNumber of Participants Diagnosed With Bleeding After the Occurrence of HIT IINo Bleeding1 participants
Danaparoid/Fondaparinux/LepirudinNumber of Participants Diagnosed With Bleeding After the Occurrence of HIT IIBleeding0 participants
Argatroban/Danaparoid/FondaparinuxNumber of Participants Diagnosed With Bleeding After the Occurrence of HIT IINo Bleeding3 participants
Argatroban/Danaparoid/FondaparinuxNumber of Participants Diagnosed With Bleeding After the Occurrence of HIT IIBleeding0 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Who Experienced Skin Changes (Erythema and Necrosis) After the Occurrence of HIT II

Participants' medical records were used to abstract data that were collected on standardized hard copy Case Report Forms (CRFs). Erythema is a redness of the skin caused by hyperemia. Necrosis is the premature death of cells or tissues.

Time frame: 19 January 2005 to 25 October 2009

Population: All documented participants diagnosed with suspected acute HIT II and a 4T Score of ≥4 who had received at least one dose of argatroban, lepirudin, danaparoid, or fondaparinux. The 4T score (range: 0-8) was developed to predict the probability of HIT.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
ArgatrobanNumber of Participants Who Experienced Skin Changes (Erythema and Necrosis) After the Occurrence of HIT IISkin changes0 participants
ArgatrobanNumber of Participants Who Experienced Skin Changes (Erythema and Necrosis) After the Occurrence of HIT IINo skin changes32 participants
LepirudinNumber of Participants Who Experienced Skin Changes (Erythema and Necrosis) After the Occurrence of HIT IISkin changes0 participants
LepirudinNumber of Participants Who Experienced Skin Changes (Erythema and Necrosis) After the Occurrence of HIT IINo skin changes4 participants
DanaparoidNumber of Participants Who Experienced Skin Changes (Erythema and Necrosis) After the Occurrence of HIT IISkin changes1 participants
DanaparoidNumber of Participants Who Experienced Skin Changes (Erythema and Necrosis) After the Occurrence of HIT IINo skin changes45 participants
FondaparinuxNumber of Participants Who Experienced Skin Changes (Erythema and Necrosis) After the Occurrence of HIT IISkin changes0 participants
FondaparinuxNumber of Participants Who Experienced Skin Changes (Erythema and Necrosis) After the Occurrence of HIT IINo skin changes78 participants
Argatroban/FondaparinuxNumber of Participants Who Experienced Skin Changes (Erythema and Necrosis) After the Occurrence of HIT IISkin changes0 participants
Argatroban/FondaparinuxNumber of Participants Who Experienced Skin Changes (Erythema and Necrosis) After the Occurrence of HIT IINo skin changes11 participants
Danaparoid/ArgatrobanNumber of Participants Who Experienced Skin Changes (Erythema and Necrosis) After the Occurrence of HIT IINo skin changes11 participants
Danaparoid/ArgatrobanNumber of Participants Who Experienced Skin Changes (Erythema and Necrosis) After the Occurrence of HIT IISkin changes0 participants
Danaparoid/FondaparinuxNumber of Participants Who Experienced Skin Changes (Erythema and Necrosis) After the Occurrence of HIT IINo skin changes5 participants
Danaparoid/FondaparinuxNumber of Participants Who Experienced Skin Changes (Erythema and Necrosis) After the Occurrence of HIT IISkin changes0 participants
Danaparoid/LepirudinNumber of Participants Who Experienced Skin Changes (Erythema and Necrosis) After the Occurrence of HIT IINo skin changes3 participants
Danaparoid/LepirudinNumber of Participants Who Experienced Skin Changes (Erythema and Necrosis) After the Occurrence of HIT IISkin changes1 participants
Danaparoid/Fondaparinux/LepirudinNumber of Participants Who Experienced Skin Changes (Erythema and Necrosis) After the Occurrence of HIT IINo skin changes0 participants
Danaparoid/Fondaparinux/LepirudinNumber of Participants Who Experienced Skin Changes (Erythema and Necrosis) After the Occurrence of HIT IISkin changes1 participants
Argatroban/Danaparoid/FondaparinuxNumber of Participants Who Experienced Skin Changes (Erythema and Necrosis) After the Occurrence of HIT IISkin changes0 participants
Argatroban/Danaparoid/FondaparinuxNumber of Participants Who Experienced Skin Changes (Erythema and Necrosis) After the Occurrence of HIT IINo skin changes3 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Who Underwent Amputation After the Occurrence of HIT II

Participants' medical records were used to abstract data that were collected on standardized hard copy Case Report Forms (CRFs).

Time frame: 19 January 2005 to 25 October 2009

Population: All documented participants diagnosed with suspected acute HIT II and a 4T Score of ≥4 who had received at least one dose of argatroban, lepirudin, danaparoid, or fondaparinux. The 4T score (range: 0-8) was developed to predict the probability of HIT.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
ArgatrobanNumber of Participants Who Underwent Amputation After the Occurrence of HIT IINo amputation32 participants
ArgatrobanNumber of Participants Who Underwent Amputation After the Occurrence of HIT IIAmputation0 participants
LepirudinNumber of Participants Who Underwent Amputation After the Occurrence of HIT IINo amputation4 participants
LepirudinNumber of Participants Who Underwent Amputation After the Occurrence of HIT IIAmputation0 participants
DanaparoidNumber of Participants Who Underwent Amputation After the Occurrence of HIT IINo amputation46 participants
DanaparoidNumber of Participants Who Underwent Amputation After the Occurrence of HIT IIAmputation0 participants
FondaparinuxNumber of Participants Who Underwent Amputation After the Occurrence of HIT IINo amputation78 participants
FondaparinuxNumber of Participants Who Underwent Amputation After the Occurrence of HIT IIAmputation0 participants
Argatroban/FondaparinuxNumber of Participants Who Underwent Amputation After the Occurrence of HIT IIAmputation0 participants
Argatroban/FondaparinuxNumber of Participants Who Underwent Amputation After the Occurrence of HIT IINo amputation11 participants
Danaparoid/ArgatrobanNumber of Participants Who Underwent Amputation After the Occurrence of HIT IIAmputation1 participants
Danaparoid/ArgatrobanNumber of Participants Who Underwent Amputation After the Occurrence of HIT IINo amputation10 participants
Danaparoid/FondaparinuxNumber of Participants Who Underwent Amputation After the Occurrence of HIT IIAmputation0 participants
Danaparoid/FondaparinuxNumber of Participants Who Underwent Amputation After the Occurrence of HIT IINo amputation5 participants
Danaparoid/LepirudinNumber of Participants Who Underwent Amputation After the Occurrence of HIT IINo amputation3 participants
Danaparoid/LepirudinNumber of Participants Who Underwent Amputation After the Occurrence of HIT IIAmputation1 participants
Danaparoid/Fondaparinux/LepirudinNumber of Participants Who Underwent Amputation After the Occurrence of HIT IINo amputation1 participants
Danaparoid/Fondaparinux/LepirudinNumber of Participants Who Underwent Amputation After the Occurrence of HIT IIAmputation0 participants
Argatroban/Danaparoid/FondaparinuxNumber of Participants Who Underwent Amputation After the Occurrence of HIT IINo amputation3 participants
Argatroban/Danaparoid/FondaparinuxNumber of Participants Who Underwent Amputation After the Occurrence of HIT IIAmputation0 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Who Were Diagnosed With Thrombocytopenia (Recurrent of Persistent) After the Occurrence of HIT II

Participants' medical records were used to abstract data that were collected on standardized hard copy Case Report Forms (CRFs). Thrombocytopenia after HIT-II was documented in the participant files.

Time frame: 19 January 2005 to 25 October 2009

Population: All documented participants diagnosed with suspected acute HIT II and a 4T Score of ≥4 who had received at least one dose of argatroban, lepirudin, danaparoid, or fondaparinux. The 4T score (range: 0-8) was developed to predict the probability of HIT.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
ArgatrobanNumber of Participants Who Were Diagnosed With Thrombocytopenia (Recurrent of Persistent) After the Occurrence of HIT IIPersistent thrombocytopenia1 participants
ArgatrobanNumber of Participants Who Were Diagnosed With Thrombocytopenia (Recurrent of Persistent) After the Occurrence of HIT IINo thrombocytopenia31 participants
ArgatrobanNumber of Participants Who Were Diagnosed With Thrombocytopenia (Recurrent of Persistent) After the Occurrence of HIT IIRecurrent thrombocytopenia0 participants
LepirudinNumber of Participants Who Were Diagnosed With Thrombocytopenia (Recurrent of Persistent) After the Occurrence of HIT IIPersistent thrombocytopenia0 participants
LepirudinNumber of Participants Who Were Diagnosed With Thrombocytopenia (Recurrent of Persistent) After the Occurrence of HIT IIRecurrent thrombocytopenia0 participants
LepirudinNumber of Participants Who Were Diagnosed With Thrombocytopenia (Recurrent of Persistent) After the Occurrence of HIT IINo thrombocytopenia4 participants
DanaparoidNumber of Participants Who Were Diagnosed With Thrombocytopenia (Recurrent of Persistent) After the Occurrence of HIT IINo thrombocytopenia44 participants
DanaparoidNumber of Participants Who Were Diagnosed With Thrombocytopenia (Recurrent of Persistent) After the Occurrence of HIT IIRecurrent thrombocytopenia1 participants
DanaparoidNumber of Participants Who Were Diagnosed With Thrombocytopenia (Recurrent of Persistent) After the Occurrence of HIT IIPersistent thrombocytopenia1 participants
FondaparinuxNumber of Participants Who Were Diagnosed With Thrombocytopenia (Recurrent of Persistent) After the Occurrence of HIT IINo thrombocytopenia78 participants
FondaparinuxNumber of Participants Who Were Diagnosed With Thrombocytopenia (Recurrent of Persistent) After the Occurrence of HIT IIRecurrent thrombocytopenia0 participants
FondaparinuxNumber of Participants Who Were Diagnosed With Thrombocytopenia (Recurrent of Persistent) After the Occurrence of HIT IIPersistent thrombocytopenia0 participants
Argatroban/FondaparinuxNumber of Participants Who Were Diagnosed With Thrombocytopenia (Recurrent of Persistent) After the Occurrence of HIT IIRecurrent thrombocytopenia0 participants
Argatroban/FondaparinuxNumber of Participants Who Were Diagnosed With Thrombocytopenia (Recurrent of Persistent) After the Occurrence of HIT IINo thrombocytopenia11 participants
Argatroban/FondaparinuxNumber of Participants Who Were Diagnosed With Thrombocytopenia (Recurrent of Persistent) After the Occurrence of HIT IIPersistent thrombocytopenia0 participants
Danaparoid/ArgatrobanNumber of Participants Who Were Diagnosed With Thrombocytopenia (Recurrent of Persistent) After the Occurrence of HIT IIPersistent thrombocytopenia0 participants
Danaparoid/ArgatrobanNumber of Participants Who Were Diagnosed With Thrombocytopenia (Recurrent of Persistent) After the Occurrence of HIT IINo thrombocytopenia8 participants
Danaparoid/ArgatrobanNumber of Participants Who Were Diagnosed With Thrombocytopenia (Recurrent of Persistent) After the Occurrence of HIT IIRecurrent thrombocytopenia3 participants
Danaparoid/FondaparinuxNumber of Participants Who Were Diagnosed With Thrombocytopenia (Recurrent of Persistent) After the Occurrence of HIT IIRecurrent thrombocytopenia0 participants
Danaparoid/FondaparinuxNumber of Participants Who Were Diagnosed With Thrombocytopenia (Recurrent of Persistent) After the Occurrence of HIT IIPersistent thrombocytopenia0 participants
Danaparoid/FondaparinuxNumber of Participants Who Were Diagnosed With Thrombocytopenia (Recurrent of Persistent) After the Occurrence of HIT IINo thrombocytopenia5 participants
Danaparoid/LepirudinNumber of Participants Who Were Diagnosed With Thrombocytopenia (Recurrent of Persistent) After the Occurrence of HIT IIPersistent thrombocytopenia0 participants
Danaparoid/LepirudinNumber of Participants Who Were Diagnosed With Thrombocytopenia (Recurrent of Persistent) After the Occurrence of HIT IIRecurrent thrombocytopenia1 participants
Danaparoid/LepirudinNumber of Participants Who Were Diagnosed With Thrombocytopenia (Recurrent of Persistent) After the Occurrence of HIT IINo thrombocytopenia3 participants
Danaparoid/Fondaparinux/LepirudinNumber of Participants Who Were Diagnosed With Thrombocytopenia (Recurrent of Persistent) After the Occurrence of HIT IIPersistent thrombocytopenia0 participants
Danaparoid/Fondaparinux/LepirudinNumber of Participants Who Were Diagnosed With Thrombocytopenia (Recurrent of Persistent) After the Occurrence of HIT IIRecurrent thrombocytopenia0 participants
Danaparoid/Fondaparinux/LepirudinNumber of Participants Who Were Diagnosed With Thrombocytopenia (Recurrent of Persistent) After the Occurrence of HIT IINo thrombocytopenia1 participants
Argatroban/Danaparoid/FondaparinuxNumber of Participants Who Were Diagnosed With Thrombocytopenia (Recurrent of Persistent) After the Occurrence of HIT IIRecurrent thrombocytopenia0 participants
Argatroban/Danaparoid/FondaparinuxNumber of Participants Who Were Diagnosed With Thrombocytopenia (Recurrent of Persistent) After the Occurrence of HIT IIPersistent thrombocytopenia2 participants
Argatroban/Danaparoid/FondaparinuxNumber of Participants Who Were Diagnosed With Thrombocytopenia (Recurrent of Persistent) After the Occurrence of HIT IINo thrombocytopenia1 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Fatal Complications After the Occurrence of HIT II

Participants' medical records were used to abstract data that were collected on standardized hard copy Case Report Forms (CRFs). A fatal complication is defined as a complication resulting in death.

Time frame: 19 January 2005 to 25 October 2009

Population: All documented participants diagnosed with suspected acute HIT II and a 4T Score of ≥4 who had received at least one dose of argatroban, lepirudin, danaparoid, or fondaparinux. The 4T score (range: 0-8) was developed to predict the probability of HIT.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
ArgatrobanNumber of Participants With Fatal Complications After the Occurrence of HIT IINo fatal complication27 participants
ArgatrobanNumber of Participants With Fatal Complications After the Occurrence of HIT IIFatal complication5 participants
LepirudinNumber of Participants With Fatal Complications After the Occurrence of HIT IIFatal complication0 participants
LepirudinNumber of Participants With Fatal Complications After the Occurrence of HIT IINo fatal complication4 participants
DanaparoidNumber of Participants With Fatal Complications After the Occurrence of HIT IIFatal complication11 participants
DanaparoidNumber of Participants With Fatal Complications After the Occurrence of HIT IINo fatal complication35 participants
FondaparinuxNumber of Participants With Fatal Complications After the Occurrence of HIT IIFatal complication0 participants
FondaparinuxNumber of Participants With Fatal Complications After the Occurrence of HIT IINo fatal complication78 participants
Argatroban/FondaparinuxNumber of Participants With Fatal Complications After the Occurrence of HIT IINo fatal complication11 participants
Argatroban/FondaparinuxNumber of Participants With Fatal Complications After the Occurrence of HIT IIFatal complication0 participants
Danaparoid/ArgatrobanNumber of Participants With Fatal Complications After the Occurrence of HIT IINo fatal complication9 participants
Danaparoid/ArgatrobanNumber of Participants With Fatal Complications After the Occurrence of HIT IIFatal complication2 participants
Danaparoid/FondaparinuxNumber of Participants With Fatal Complications After the Occurrence of HIT IINo fatal complication5 participants
Danaparoid/FondaparinuxNumber of Participants With Fatal Complications After the Occurrence of HIT IIFatal complication0 participants
Danaparoid/LepirudinNumber of Participants With Fatal Complications After the Occurrence of HIT IIFatal complication2 participants
Danaparoid/LepirudinNumber of Participants With Fatal Complications After the Occurrence of HIT IINo fatal complication2 participants
Danaparoid/Fondaparinux/LepirudinNumber of Participants With Fatal Complications After the Occurrence of HIT IINo fatal complication1 participants
Danaparoid/Fondaparinux/LepirudinNumber of Participants With Fatal Complications After the Occurrence of HIT IIFatal complication0 participants
Argatroban/Danaparoid/FondaparinuxNumber of Participants With Fatal Complications After the Occurrence of HIT IINo fatal complication3 participants
Argatroban/Danaparoid/FondaparinuxNumber of Participants With Fatal Complications After the Occurrence of HIT IIFatal complication0 participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 8, 2026