Skip to content

Clinical Study to Evaluate the Effect of pH on Pain Upon Local Anesthetic Administration.

A Single-center, Randomized, Double-blind Clinical Study to Evaluate the Effect of pH on Pain Upon Local Anesthetic Administration.

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01304082
Enrollment
29
Registered
2011-02-25
Start date
2011-01-31
Completion date
2014-11-30
Last updated
2017-04-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Local Anesthetics

Keywords

pain pH local anesthetics

Brief summary

When one receives a local anesthetic, such as novocaine for a dental procedure, there is a burning painful sensation experienced upon injection of the local anesthetic. We are trying to understand the role of pH (how acidic a solution is) in the production of pain during local anesthetic administration. We hypothesize that less acidic solutions produce less burning. We also want to determine whether or not the pH of the solution affects the rate of onset of the local anesthesia. We will recruit subjects from patients who have a clinical indication for lumbar medial branch (LMB) nerve blocks, procedures frequently performed at the Massachusetts General Hospital Center for Pain Medicine. For each patient, three nerve blocks are administered at adjacent spinal levels, typically using either lidocaine or bicarbonate-buffered lidocaine as the local anesthetic. We will add a saline control as part of the research procedure and then provide lidocaine at the control location before continuing with the nerve blocks. This clinical procedure offers an ideal opportunity to compare the effects of the three solutions. There will be almost no deviation from the standard clinical procedure. After the injection of each solution, the pain score on administration of the medication will be recorded immediately. We will also provide a continuous stimulation (pin taps) after the local anesthetic injection and record when the patient experiences hypoesthesia (reduced sensation) and anesthesia (absent sensation). Finally, we will record the pain score upon reinsertion of a needle to mark the precise location (part of the clinical procedure) one minute after the local anesthetic injection. All data will be collected during the a single clinical visit. The study will conclude when 60 subjects have successfully been tested. Data will be reviewed annually.

Interventions

DRUGLidocaine

1 ml subcutaneous injection of 0.9% lidocaine, given once

DRUGnormal saline

1 ml subcutaneous injection 0.9% sodium chloride, given once

1 ml subcutaneous injection of 0.9% lidocaine and 0.84% sodium bicarbonate

Sponsors

Massachusetts General Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Caregiver)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
19 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* patients at MGH Center for Pain Medicine who have clinical indication for undergoing diagnostic medial branch block of nerves to facet joints.

Exclusion criteria

* contraindication to the clinical procedure * do not speak English

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Rank-transformed Pain Scoreimmediate, upon injection of each solutionPain score upon injection of local anesthetic: the pain score is a validated 11-point numeric rating scale in which patients rate pain between 0 (no pain) and 10 (worst pain imaginable).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Rank-transformed Time (Seconds) Until Hypoesthesia0-180 seconds after each injection.Rank-transformed time (seconds) until hypoesthesia will be assessed using a sensory stimulus
Rank-transformed Time (Seconds) Until Anesthesia0-180 seconds after each injectionRank-transformed time (seconds) until anesthesia will be assessed using a repeated sensory stimulus.
Rank-transformed Pain Score Upon Needle Stick.1 minute after each injectionPain score upon needle stick: The pain score is a validated 11-point numeric rating scale in which patients rate pain between 0 (no pain) and 10 (worst pain imaginable).

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
All Study Participants
All study participants
29
Total29

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAll Study Participants
Age, Continuous54.5 years
Baseline Pain Score6 units on a scale
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
1 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
17 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
11 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
29 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
29 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
13 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
16 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 290 / 290 / 29
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 290 / 290 / 29

Outcome results

Primary

Rank-transformed Pain Score

Pain score upon injection of local anesthetic: the pain score is a validated 11-point numeric rating scale in which patients rate pain between 0 (no pain) and 10 (worst pain imaginable).

Time frame: immediate, upon injection of each solution

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Normal SalineRank-transformed Pain ScoreDifference compared to control0 rank
Normal SalineRank-transformed Pain ScoreRank-transformed pain score1.97 rank
Normal SalineRank-transformed Pain ScoreDifference compared to lidocaine-0.138 rank
LidocaineRank-transformed Pain ScoreDifference compared to control0.138 rank
LidocaineRank-transformed Pain ScoreRank-transformed pain score2.10 rank
LidocaineRank-transformed Pain ScoreDifference compared to lidocaine0 rank
Alkalinized LidocaineRank-transformed Pain ScoreRank-transformed pain score1.93 rank
Alkalinized LidocaineRank-transformed Pain ScoreDifference compared to lidocaine-0.172 rank
Alkalinized LidocaineRank-transformed Pain ScoreDifference compared to control-0.034 rank
Comparison: Analysis: Non-parametric Friedman ANOVA test on rank-transformed outcome with Bonferroni correction for pairwise comparisons.~Null hypothesis: No difference between the groupsp-value: 0.7535non-parametric Friedman ANOVA test
Secondary

Rank-transformed Pain Score Upon Needle Stick.

Pain score upon needle stick: The pain score is a validated 11-point numeric rating scale in which patients rate pain between 0 (no pain) and 10 (worst pain imaginable).

Time frame: 1 minute after each injection

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Normal SalineRank-transformed Pain Score Upon Needle Stick.Difference compared to control0 rank
Normal SalineRank-transformed Pain Score Upon Needle Stick.Rank-transformed pain score2.72 rank
Normal SalineRank-transformed Pain Score Upon Needle Stick.Difference compared to lidocaine1.09 rank
LidocaineRank-transformed Pain Score Upon Needle Stick.Difference compared to control-1.09 rank
LidocaineRank-transformed Pain Score Upon Needle Stick.Rank-transformed pain score1.64 rank
LidocaineRank-transformed Pain Score Upon Needle Stick.Difference compared to lidocaine0 rank
Alkalinized LidocaineRank-transformed Pain Score Upon Needle Stick.Rank-transformed pain score1.64 rank
Alkalinized LidocaineRank-transformed Pain Score Upon Needle Stick.Difference compared to lidocaine0 rank
Alkalinized LidocaineRank-transformed Pain Score Upon Needle Stick.Difference compared to control-1.09 rank
Comparison: Analysis: Non-parametric Friedman ANOVA test on rank-transformed outcome with Bonferroni correction for pairwise comparisons.~Null hypothesis: No difference between the groupsp-value: <0.0001non-parametric Friedman ANOVA test
Secondary

Rank-transformed Time (Seconds) Until Anesthesia

Rank-transformed time (seconds) until anesthesia will be assessed using a repeated sensory stimulus.

Time frame: 0-180 seconds after each injection

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Normal SalineRank-transformed Time (Seconds) Until AnesthesiaDifference compared to control0 rank
Normal SalineRank-transformed Time (Seconds) Until AnesthesiaRank-transformed time (s)2.90 rank
Normal SalineRank-transformed Time (Seconds) Until AnesthesiaDifference compared to lidocaine1.28 rank
LidocaineRank-transformed Time (Seconds) Until AnesthesiaDifference compared to control-1.28 rank
LidocaineRank-transformed Time (Seconds) Until AnesthesiaRank-transformed time (s)1.62 rank
LidocaineRank-transformed Time (Seconds) Until AnesthesiaDifference compared to lidocaine0 rank
Alkalinized LidocaineRank-transformed Time (Seconds) Until AnesthesiaRank-transformed time (s)1.48 rank
Alkalinized LidocaineRank-transformed Time (Seconds) Until AnesthesiaDifference compared to lidocaine-0.14 rank
Alkalinized LidocaineRank-transformed Time (Seconds) Until AnesthesiaDifference compared to control-1.41 rank
Comparison: Analysis: Non-parametric Friedman ANOVA test on rank-transformed outcome with Bonferroni correction for pairwise comparisons.~Null hypothesis: No difference between the groupsp-value: <0.0001non-parametric Friedman ANOVA test
Secondary

Rank-transformed Time (Seconds) Until Hypoesthesia

Rank-transformed time (seconds) until hypoesthesia will be assessed using a sensory stimulus

Time frame: 0-180 seconds after each injection.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Normal SalineRank-transformed Time (Seconds) Until HypoesthesiaDifference compared to control0 rank
Normal SalineRank-transformed Time (Seconds) Until HypoesthesiaRank-transformed time (s)2.95 rank
Normal SalineRank-transformed Time (Seconds) Until HypoesthesiaDifference compared to lidocaine1.48 rank
LidocaineRank-transformed Time (Seconds) Until HypoesthesiaDifference compared to control-1.48 rank
LidocaineRank-transformed Time (Seconds) Until HypoesthesiaRank-transformed time (s)1.47 rank
LidocaineRank-transformed Time (Seconds) Until HypoesthesiaDifference compared to lidocaine0 rank
Alkalinized LidocaineRank-transformed Time (Seconds) Until HypoesthesiaRank-transformed time (s)1.59 rank
Alkalinized LidocaineRank-transformed Time (Seconds) Until HypoesthesiaDifference compared to lidocaine0.121 rank
Alkalinized LidocaineRank-transformed Time (Seconds) Until HypoesthesiaDifference compared to control-1.36 rank
Comparison: Analysis: Non-parametric Friedman ANOVA test on rank-transformed outcome with Bonferroni correction for pairwise comparisons.~Null hypothesis: No difference between the groupsp-value: <0.0001non-parametric Friedman ANOVA test

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026