Skip to content

Allo Transplant Followed by Lenalidomide and Sirolimus Maintenance in High-Risk Multiple Myeloma (MM)

Phase I/II Trial of Allogeneic Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation Followed by Maintenance Therapy With Lenalidomide and Sirolimus in Patients With High-Risk Multiple Myeloma

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01303965
Enrollment
14
Registered
2011-02-25
Start date
2011-02-07
Completion date
2017-07-28
Last updated
2019-01-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Multiple Myeloma

Brief summary

One of the complications that can occur after a stem cell transplant is called graft versus host disease (GVHD). Another complication is that multiple myeloma may come back (relapse). In this study, a drug called lenalidomide will be started 1-2 months after a transplant, or possibly later depending on recovery of your side effects. Lenalidomide and sirolimus have been shown to work together against multiple myeloma. Therefore, lenalidomide will be combined with sirolimus with the hope that this will help prolong the amount of time the disease is in remission. Researchers hope these steps will help prolong the amount of time the multiple myeloma is in remission and will decrease the chance of GvHD.

Interventions

DRUGSirolimus

Start on Day -3 and continue for 1 year

DRUGTacrolimus

Start on Day -3 and begin tapering on Day +100 until Day +180.

DRUGLenalidomide

Start between Day +30 and +120 and continue for 1 year.

Sponsors

Celgene Corporation
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Sherif S. Farag
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Recipient Inclusion Criteria: * 1\. Understand and voluntarily sign an informed consent form. * 2\. Age 18-70 years at the time of signing the informed consent form. * 3\. Able to adhere to the study visit schedule and other protocol requirements. * 4\. Previously documented multiple myeloma (MM) with measurable monoclonal protein by either serum/urine protein electrophoresis or serum free light chains, or measurable plasmacytomas. * 5\. ECOG performance status of 0-2 at study entry (see Appendix 2). * 6\. Acceptable organ function as outlined in the protocol. * 7\. Otherwise fitting institutional criteria for allogeneic stem cell transplantation. * 8\. Presence of an HLA-matched (5/6 or 6/6 matched for HLA-A, B, and DR) sibling donor, or a HLA-matched (matched for at least HLA-A, B, C, and DRB1) unrelated donor by high-resolution testing. * 9\. Disease free of prior malignancies for \>/= 5 years with exception of currently treated basal cell, squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, or carcinoma insitu of the cervix or breast. * 10\. All study participants must be registered into the mandatory RevAssist® program, and be willing and able to comply with the requirements of RevAssist®. * 11\. Females of childbearing potential (FCBP) must have a negative serum or urine pregnancy test Recipient

Exclusion criteria

* 1\. Any serious medical condition, laboratory abnormality, or psychiatric illness that would prevent the subject from signing the informed consent form. * 2\. Pregnant or breast feeding females. * 3\. Any condition, including the presence of laboratory abnormalities, which places the subject at unacceptable risk if he/she were to participate in the study or confounds the ability to interpret data from the study. * 4\. Known hypersensitivity to thalidomide or Lenalidomide. * 5\. The development of erythema nodosum if characterized by a desquamating rash while taking thalidomide or similar drugs. * 6\. Known seropositive for or active viral infection with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B virus (HBV) or hepatitis C virus (HCV). Patients who are seropositive because of hepatitis B virus vaccine or prior infection to which they are now immune (i.e., not carriers) are eligible. Donor Inclusion Criteria: The following categories of donor will be acceptable: * 1\. HLA-matched related donor (5/6 or 6/6 match): Minimal typing necessary is serologic typing for class I (A, B) and molecular typing for class II (DRB1). * 2\. HLA-matched Unrelated Donor (MUD): Molecular identity at least at HLA A, B, C, and DRB1 and DQB1 (8/10 match) by high resolution typing is required. * 3\. Syngeneic donors are not eligible. * 4\. The donor must be healthy and must be an acceptable donor as per institutional standards for marrow or stem cell donation. * 5\. Age ≥ 18 years

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Phase I: Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicity28 daysThe number of patients who had a DLT during the dose finding/confirming portion (Phase I) of the trial for the safety of the combination of sirolimus, tacrolimus and lenalidomid. Patients will be monitored for 28 days (a cycle) to determine whether a DLT is experienced for the specific dose level.
Phase II: Percent of Patients Alive and Free of Progression at 12 Months Following TransplantTransplant (Day 0) through 1 year post-transplantPercent of patients and the 95% Binomial Confidence interval who were alive and free of progression at 12 months following transplant for the patients in Phase II. Progression will be based on International Myeloma Working Group criteria where patients may meet any one of the following criteria - increase of 25% or more in serum or urine M-protein from baseline, Serum M-protein and/or the absolute increase must be \>=0.5 g/dl, Urine M-protein and/or absolute increase must be \>=200 mg/24 hours, development of new bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacyomas or definite increase in the size of existing bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacyomas, or development of hypercalcemia (corrected serum Ca++\>11.5 mg/dl) that can be attributed solely to plasma cell proliferative disease.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Phase II - Percent of Patients With Treatment-related Deaths at 100 Days100 days post transplantPercent of patients and the 95% Binomial Confidence interval who had treatment-related deaths by 100 days for patients in Phase II.
Phase II - Percent of Patients With Treatment-related Deaths at 1 YearTransplant (Day 0) through 1 year post-transplantPercent of patients and the 95% Binomial Confidence interval who had treatment-related deaths by 1 year for patients in Phase II.
Phase II - Percent of Patients With Acute Graft Versus Host Disease (GvHD)Day 0 through 1 year post transplantationPercent of patients and the 95% Binomial Confidence interval who had any stage I-IV acute GvHD based on the modified Keystone Grading Scale for skin, liver and gastrointestinal symptoms for patients in Phase II. Zero means no acute GvHD was reported, and higher stages are worse outcomes (range of 0-4). For skin: 0=no rash; 1=erthematous macular rash over \<25% body surface; 2=over 25-50% of body surface; 4=bullae, exfoliation ulcerative dermatitis. For liver (bilirubin (mg/dL)): 0= \<2.0; 1= 2-\<2.9; 3= 3-\<5.9; 4= \>=15 . For gut changes (diarrhea\[ml/day\]): 0=none; 1= \>500-1000; 2= \>1000-1500; 3= \>1500; 4=severe abdominal pain with or without ileus. Overall grade 0: Skin=0; liver=0; gut changes=0. Overall grade 1: Skin with 1 or 2; liver=0; gut changes=0. Overall grade 2: Skin with 1, 2, or 3; liver=1; gut changes=1. Overall grade 3: Skin with 2 or 3; liver with 2 or 3; gut changes with 2 or 3. Overall grade 4: Patients with grade 4 toxicity in any organ system.
Phase II - Time to Platelet EngraftmentTransplant (Day 0) through 1 year post-transplantTime to platelet engraftment will be analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method. The time to engraftment of platelets is defined as the time from day 0 to the first of three consecutive Complete Blood Counts (CBCs) obtained on different days after transplantation during which the platelet count is at least 20 x109/l. The CBCs obtained should be at least seven days after the most recent platelet transfusion. Only patients who achieved engraftment of platelets will be included in the analysis. The median and 95% confidence intervals will be provided.
Phase II - Time to Neutrophil EngraftmentTransplant (Day 0) through 1 year post transplantTime to neutrophil engraftment will be analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method. The time to engraftment of neutrophils is defined as the time from day 0 to the date of the first of three consecutive days after transplantation during which the absolute neutrophils count (ANC) is at least 0.5 x109/l. Patients surviving at least 14 days after transplant will be evaluable for this endpoint. Patients who did not have neutrophil engraftment before death will be censored at the date of death. The median and 95% confidence intervals will be provided.
Phase II - Percent of Patients With Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease (GvHD)Transplant (Day 0) through 1 year post-transplantPercent of patients and the 95% Binomial Confidence interval who had any chronic GvHD reported based on Filipovich et al. consensus document (BB&MT 2005) and Akpek et al. chronic GvHD grading system (Blood 2003) for patients in Phase II.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This protocol was a Phase I/II study. Phase I was based on a 3+3 design with the first cohort found to be safe with 3 patients. Phase II was based on a Simon Minimax two-stage design with the first interim analysis planned after 28 patients. The study was stopped at 11 patients in Phase II due to slow accrual.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Phase I Dose Finding
Standard treatment of sirolimus and tacrolimus as GvHD prophylaxis with sirolimus (target plasma drug level of 5-10 ng/ml) and lenalidomide (15 mg daily) as post-transplant maintenance
3
Phase II
Standard treatment of sirolimus and tacrolimus as GvHD prophylaxis with sirolimus (target plasma drug level of 5-10 ng/ml) and lenalidomide (15 mg daily) as post-transplant maintenance
11
Total14

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event11
Overall StudyDeath03
Overall StudyDisease Progression16
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPhase I Dose FindingPhase IITotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
3 Participants11 Participants14 Participants
Age, Continuous57.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.44
52.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.7
53.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.9
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
3 Participants11 Participants14 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
3 Participants10 Participants13 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
1 Participants5 Participants6 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
2 Participants6 Participants8 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
3 / 311 / 11
serious
Total, serious adverse events
2 / 38 / 11

Outcome results

Primary

Phase II: Percent of Patients Alive and Free of Progression at 12 Months Following Transplant

Percent of patients and the 95% Binomial Confidence interval who were alive and free of progression at 12 months following transplant for the patients in Phase II. Progression will be based on International Myeloma Working Group criteria where patients may meet any one of the following criteria - increase of 25% or more in serum or urine M-protein from baseline, Serum M-protein and/or the absolute increase must be \>=0.5 g/dl, Urine M-protein and/or absolute increase must be \>=200 mg/24 hours, development of new bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacyomas or definite increase in the size of existing bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacyomas, or development of hypercalcemia (corrected serum Ca++\>11.5 mg/dl) that can be attributed solely to plasma cell proliferative disease.

Time frame: Transplant (Day 0) through 1 year post-transplant

Population: All patients who received treatment and were followed after transplant.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Phase I Dose FindingPhase II: Percent of Patients Alive and Free of Progression at 12 Months Following Transplant18.2 percentage of participants
Primary

Phase I: Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicity

The number of patients who had a DLT during the dose finding/confirming portion (Phase I) of the trial for the safety of the combination of sirolimus, tacrolimus and lenalidomid. Patients will be monitored for 28 days (a cycle) to determine whether a DLT is experienced for the specific dose level.

Time frame: 28 days

Population: All patients assigned to Phase I and received treatment medication.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Phase I Dose FindingPhase I: Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicity0 Participants
Secondary

Phase II - Percent of Patients With Acute Graft Versus Host Disease (GvHD)

Percent of patients and the 95% Binomial Confidence interval who had any stage I-IV acute GvHD based on the modified Keystone Grading Scale for skin, liver and gastrointestinal symptoms for patients in Phase II. Zero means no acute GvHD was reported, and higher stages are worse outcomes (range of 0-4). For skin: 0=no rash; 1=erthematous macular rash over \<25% body surface; 2=over 25-50% of body surface; 4=bullae, exfoliation ulcerative dermatitis. For liver (bilirubin (mg/dL)): 0= \<2.0; 1= 2-\<2.9; 3= 3-\<5.9; 4= \>=15 . For gut changes (diarrhea\[ml/day\]): 0=none; 1= \>500-1000; 2= \>1000-1500; 3= \>1500; 4=severe abdominal pain with or without ileus. Overall grade 0: Skin=0; liver=0; gut changes=0. Overall grade 1: Skin with 1 or 2; liver=0; gut changes=0. Overall grade 2: Skin with 1, 2, or 3; liver=1; gut changes=1. Overall grade 3: Skin with 2 or 3; liver with 2 or 3; gut changes with 2 or 3. Overall grade 4: Patients with grade 4 toxicity in any organ system.

Time frame: Day 0 through 1 year post transplantation

Population: All patients who received treatment and were followed after transplant

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Phase I Dose FindingPhase II - Percent of Patients With Acute Graft Versus Host Disease (GvHD)36.4 percentage of participants
Secondary

Phase II - Percent of Patients With Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease (GvHD)

Percent of patients and the 95% Binomial Confidence interval who had any chronic GvHD reported based on Filipovich et al. consensus document (BB&MT 2005) and Akpek et al. chronic GvHD grading system (Blood 2003) for patients in Phase II.

Time frame: Transplant (Day 0) through 1 year post-transplant

Population: All patients who received treatment and were followed after transplant

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Phase I Dose FindingPhase II - Percent of Patients With Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease (GvHD)18.2 percentage of participants
Secondary

Phase II - Percent of Patients With Treatment-related Deaths at 100 Days

Percent of patients and the 95% Binomial Confidence interval who had treatment-related deaths by 100 days for patients in Phase II.

Time frame: 100 days post transplant

Population: All patients who received treatment and were followed after transplant

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Phase I Dose FindingPhase II - Percent of Patients With Treatment-related Deaths at 100 Days18.2 percentage of participants
Secondary

Phase II - Percent of Patients With Treatment-related Deaths at 1 Year

Percent of patients and the 95% Binomial Confidence interval who had treatment-related deaths by 1 year for patients in Phase II.

Time frame: Transplant (Day 0) through 1 year post-transplant

Population: All patients who received treatment and were followed after transplant

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Phase I Dose FindingPhase II - Percent of Patients With Treatment-related Deaths at 1 Year36.4 percentage of participants
Secondary

Phase II - Time to Neutrophil Engraftment

Time to neutrophil engraftment will be analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method. The time to engraftment of neutrophils is defined as the time from day 0 to the date of the first of three consecutive days after transplantation during which the absolute neutrophils count (ANC) is at least 0.5 x109/l. Patients surviving at least 14 days after transplant will be evaluable for this endpoint. Patients who did not have neutrophil engraftment before death will be censored at the date of death. The median and 95% confidence intervals will be provided.

Time frame: Transplant (Day 0) through 1 year post transplant

Population: All patients who received treatment and survived at least 14 days after transplant

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Phase I Dose FindingPhase II - Time to Neutrophil Engraftment11 days
Secondary

Phase II - Time to Platelet Engraftment

Time to platelet engraftment will be analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method. The time to engraftment of platelets is defined as the time from day 0 to the first of three consecutive Complete Blood Counts (CBCs) obtained on different days after transplantation during which the platelet count is at least 20 x109/l. The CBCs obtained should be at least seven days after the most recent platelet transfusion. Only patients who achieved engraftment of platelets will be included in the analysis. The median and 95% confidence intervals will be provided.

Time frame: Transplant (Day 0) through 1 year post-transplant

Population: All patients who received treatment and who achieved platelet recovery/engraftment of platelets

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Phase I Dose FindingPhase II - Time to Platelet Engraftment19 days

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026