Skip to content

Safety of and Immune Response to Dolutegravir in HIV-1 Infected Infants, Children, and Adolescents

Phase I/II, Multi-Center, Open-Label Pharmacokinetic, Safety, Tolerability and Antiviral Activity of Dolutegravir, a Novel Integrase Inhibitor, in Combination Regimens in HIV-1 Infected Infants, Children and Adolescents

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01302847
Enrollment
181
Registered
2011-02-24
Start date
2011-04-20
Completion date
2023-10-18
Last updated
2024-12-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

HIV Infections

Keywords

Integrase Inhibitors, Infant, Child, Adolescent

Brief summary

Dolutegravir (DTG) is an HIV drug in the integrase inhibitor drug class. This study evaluated the pharmacokinetics (PK), safety, tolerability of and immune response to DTG when used concurrently with optimized background therapy (OBT) in HIV-1 infected infants, children, and adolescents.

Detailed description

DTG is an HIV medicine in the integrase inhibitor drug class. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics, safety, tolerability, and antiviral activity of DTG when used concurrently with OBT in HIV-1 infected infants, children, and adolescents. Participants in this study were evaluated for PK, safety and tolerability through 48 weeks, followed by additional long-term study follow-up that lasted for approximately 144 weeks (3 years), for a total of 192 weeks on study. This study had two stages. Stage I provided pharmacokinetics, short-term tolerability and safety data on DTG on a limited number of participants to permit dose selection for further study in Stage II. Once a Stage I dose was accepted, enrollment to Stage II began to complete enrollment to the cohort. Stage II provided longer-term safety and antiviral activity data among a larger number of participants. Infants, children and adolescents with HIV-1, aged ≥ 4 weeks to \< 18 years enrolled in the age and formulation cohorts specified below: * Cohort I: Adolescents ≥ 12 to \<18 years of age (film-coated tablets) * Cohort IIA: Children ≥ 6 to \<12 years of age (film-coated tablets) * Cohort IIB: Children ≥ 6 to \<12 years of age (granules for suspension) * Cohort III: Children ≥ 2 to \< 6 years of age (granules for suspension) * Cohort IV: Children ≥ 6 months to \< 2 years of age (granules for suspension) * Cohort III-DT: Children ≥ 2 to \< 6 years of age (dispersible tablets) * Cohort IV-DT: Children ≥ 6 months to \< 2 years of age (dispersible tablets) * Cohort V-DT: Infants ≥ 4 weeks to \< 6 months (dispersible tablets) Cohorts were opened sequentially according by age group (starting with the older age group), DTG formulation, and study stage, i.e. Initial study enrollment was for Cohort I and progressed to Cohort IIA once Cohort I Stage I met the PK and safety criteria, followed by opening of Cohort IIB. Each cohort enrolled in two sequential stages: Stage I and II (the only exception is Cohort IIB, which only enrolled through Stage I). Sequential enrollment for Cohort III and IV proceeded in the same manner. Cohort V never enrolled because of the recommended changes in dosing and inclusion of enrollment weight band in the criteria for dose finding. Stage I participants had physical examinations and had blood draws for safety assessments at study visits: Day 0; Day 5 (+5 days); and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 32, 40, and 48. Stage I participants also had intensive PK sampling with blood samples collected at time 0 (pre-dose), and at 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 and 24 hours post dosing. Once a Stage I treatment dose was accepted, enrollment to Stage II began to complete enrollment to the cohort. Stage II participants had physical examinations and blood draws for safety assessment at study visits: Day 0; Day 10; and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 32, 40, and 48. Blood, plasma, and urine were collected and tested to measure immune response. Females of childbearing potential underwent pregnancy testing at screening and at every study visit. After 48 weeks, all Stage I and Stage II participants entered the long-term study follow-up and continued to receive DTG. During this time, participants had safety and/or antiviral activity assessments every 12 weeks for up to 3 years. The study was able to determine a proposed dose (i.e. optimal dose) for Cohorts I, IIA, III-DT, IV-DT, and V-DT but not for Cohorts IIB, III, and IV. Participants on the proposed dose had intensive PK sampling between days 5 and10 of DTG initiation with blood samples collected at time 0 (pre-dose), and at 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 and 24 hours post dosing. The study is closed to accrual and study follow-up was completed on Oct 18, 2023.

Interventions

DRUGDTG film-coated tablets

DTG film-coated tablets initial starting dose at \ 1 mg/kg with a maximum dose of 50 mg; orally once daily. Participants weighing ≥ 35kg received the proposed dose of 50 mg of DTG film-coated tablets.

DRUGDTG granules for suspension

DTG granules for suspension initial starting dose at \ 0.64 mg/kg with a maximum dose of 32 mg; orally once daily.

DRUGDTG dispersible tablets

DTG dispersible tablets initial starting dose of \ 0.8 mg/kg with a maximum dose of 30 mg; orally once daily. The proposed weight-band dosing was: Weight band 3 to \<6 kg: 5 mg DTG dispersible tablets; Weight band 6 to \<10 kg: 15 mg DTG dispersible tablets; Weight band 10 to \<14 kg: 20 mg DTG dispersible tablets; Weight band 14 to \<20 kg: 25 mg DTG dispersible tablets; Weight band ≥20 kg: 30 mg DTG dispersible tablets.

Sponsors

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
Lead SponsorNIH

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
4 Weeks to 17 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Confirmed HIV-1 infection, defined as positive results from two samples collected at different time points (see protocol for more information) * Participant belonged to one of the ARV exposure groups below: 1. ARV-treatment experienced (not including receipt of ARVs as prophylaxis or for prevention of perinatal transmission) * Previously took ARVs for treatment, but not taking ARVs at study screening. * Had been off treatment for greater than or equal to 4 weeks prior to screening, OR * At screening, taking ARVs for treatment but failing. * Was on an unchanged, failing therapeutic regimen within the 4 to 12 weeks prior to screening (less than or equal to 1 log drop in HIV-1 RNA within the 4 to 12 weeks prior to screening). OR * For participants less than 2 years of age, initiated ARVs for treatment less than 4 weeks prior to screening. 2. ARV treatment naive (no exposure to ARVs for treatment; could have received ARVs for prophylaxis or prevention of perinatal transmission) * If an infant had received nevirapine (NVP) as prophylaxis to prevent perinatal transmission, he or she did not receive NVP for at least 14 days prior to enrollment into Stage I or II. * HIV-1 RNA viral load greater than 1,000 copies/mL of plasma at screening. * Demonstrated ability or willingness to swallow assigned study medications. * Parent or legal guardian were able and willing to provide signed informed consent. * Female participants of reproductive potential, defined as having reached menarche, and who were engaging in sexual activity that could lead to pregnancy, agreed to use two contraceptive methods while on study and for two weeks after stopping study drug. * Males engaging in sexual activity that could lead to HIV-1 transmission agreed to use a condom. * Agreed to stay on optimized background therapy (OBT) while on study: * Participants who at screening were greater than or equal to 2 years of age and ARV-treatment experienced, had at screening at least one fully active drug for the OBT. * Participants who were greater than or equal to 2 years of age and ARV-treatment naïve, had genotype testing at screening/entry even with results pending. * Participants less than 2 years of age (either ARV-treatment experienced or ARV treatment naïve), had genotype testing at screening/entry even with results pending.

Exclusion criteria

* Presence of any active AIDS-defining opportunistic infection * At enrollment, participant less than 3.0 kg * Known Grade 3 or greater of any of the following laboratory toxicities within 30 days prior to study entry: neutrophil count, hemoglobin, platelets, aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine transaminase (ALT), lipase, serum creatinine and total bilirubin. A single repeat within the 30 days is allowed for eligibility determination. NOTE: Grade 3 total bilirubin was allowable, if the participant was on atazanavir (ATV). * ANY known Grade 4 laboratory toxicities within 30 days prior to study entry. NOTE: Grade 4 total bilirubin was allowable, if the participant was on ATV. * The following liver toxicities within 30 days prior to study entry: ALT greater than 3x the upper limit of normal (ULN) AND direct bilirubin was greater than 2x ULN * Any prior history of malignancy, with the exception of localized malignancies such as squamous cell or basal cell carcinoma of the skin * Clinical or symptomatic evidence of pancreatitis, as determined by the clinician * Use of any disallowed medications at time of screening (see the protocol for a complete list of disallowed medications) * Known history of exposure to integrase inhibitor treatment by the participant or participant's mother prior to delivery/cessation of breastfeeding * Known resistance to an integrase inhibitor * Women who were pregnant or breastfeeding * At screening/entry, participating in or had participated in a study with a compound or device that was not commercially available within 30 days of signing informed consent, unless permission from both Protocol Teams was granted * Participant was unlikely to adhere to the study procedures, keep appointments, or was planning to relocate during the study to a non-IMPAACT study site * Any clinically significant diseases (other than HIV infection) or clinically significant findings during the screening medical history or physical examination that, in the investigator's opinion, would compromise the outcome of this study * At screening/entry had used, or anticipated using, chronic systemic immunosuppressive agents or systemic interferon (e.g., for treatment of hepatitis C virus \[HCV\] infection) within 30 days prior to beginning DTG study treatment. Systemic corticosteroids (e.g., prednisone or equivalent up to 2 mg/kg/day) for replacement therapy or short courses (less than or equal to 30 days) were permitted. (See protocol for more information on disallowed medications.) * Any condition that in the opinion of the site investigator, placed the participant at an unacceptable risk of injury or render the participant unable to meet the requirements of the protocol. * Active tuberculosis (TB) disease and/or requirement for treatment that included rifampin at the time of the screening visit. However, participants who needed rifampin treatment while on DTG were allowed to continue in P1093 provided the DTG dose was adjusted according to the protocol.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events (AEs)From treatment initiation through Weeks 24 and 48All grade 3 or higher signs/symptoms, diagnoses, and laboratory AEs were included. AE grading was based on DAIDS AE Grading Table, Version 1.0, December 2004 (Clarification, August 2009). A 2-sided 95% Confidence Interval (CI) was calculated for the percentage using the binominal exact method.
Percentage of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events (AEs) Assessed as Related to Study DrugFrom treatment initiation through Weeks 24 and 48All grade 3 or higher signs/symptoms, diagnoses, and laboratory AEs were included. AE grading was based on DAIDS AE Grading Table, Version 1.0, December 2004 (Clarification, August 2009). A 2-sided 95% Confidence Interval (CI) was calculated for the percentage using the binominal exact method.
Number of Participants With Permanent Discontinuation of Study Drug Due to Adverse Events (AEs) Assessed as Related to Study DrugFrom treatment initiation through Weeks 24 and 48Number of participants with permanent discontinuation of study drug due to AEs assessed by the site investigator as related to the study drug.
Number of Participants Who DiedFrom treatment initiation through Weeks 24 and 48Number of participants who died were summarized
PK Parameter: Area-under-the-curve From 0 to 24 Hours (AUC0-24)One intensive PK visit between 5 and 10 days of DTG initiation. At intensive PK visit, blood samples were drawn pre-dose and at 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 and 24 hours post dosingPharmacokinetic parameters were determined from plasma concentration-time profiles using non-compartmental methods (Phoenix WinNonlin 8.0 or current, Certara, Princeton, NJ). AUC0-24 was determined using linear up-log down estimation in WinNonlin.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA Less Than 50 Copies/mlWeek 24 and Week 48Virologic responses were assessed at weeks 24 and 48 as percentages of participants and exact 95% Confidence Interval (CI), The virologic response or virologic failure was defined and calculated according to FDA's Snapshot algorithm.
PK Parameter: Plasma Concentration Observed at End of 24 Hour Dosing Interval (C24h)One intensive PK visit between 5 and 10 days of DTG initiation. At intensive PK visit, blood samples were drawn pre-dose and at 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 and 24 hours post dosingDetermined from plasma concentration-time profiles using non-compartmental methods (Phoenix WinNonlin 8.0 or current, Certara, Princeton, NJ). C24h was taken directly from the observed concentration-time data or estimated using the elimination rate constant.
PK Parameter: Plasma Concentration Observed Immediately to Dosing of 24 Hour Dosing Interval (C0h)One intensive PK visit between 5 and 10 days of DTG initiation. At intensive PK visit, blood samples were drawn pre-dose and at 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 and 24 hours post dosingDetermined from plasma concentration-time profiles using non-compartmental methods (Phoenix WinNonlin 8.0 or current, Certara, Princeton, NJ). C0h was taken directly from the observed concentration-time data.
PK Parameter: Minimum Plasma Concentration (Cmin)One intensive PK visit between 5 and 10 days of DTG initiation. At intensive PK visit, blood samples were drawn pre-dose and at 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 and 24 hours post dosingDetermined from plasma concentration-time profiles using non-compartmental methods (Phoenix WinNonlin 8.0 or current, Certara, Princeton, NJ) and were performed in real-time. Cmin was taken directly from the observed concentration-time data.
PK Parameter: Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax)One intensive PK visit between 5 and 10 days of DTG initiation. At intensive PK visit, blood samples were drawn pre-dose and at 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 and 24 hours post dosingDetermined from plasma concentration-time profiles using non-compartmental methods (Phoenix WinNonlin 8.0 or current, Certara, Princeton, NJ). Cmax was taken directly from the observed concentration-time data.
PK Parameter: Apparent Clearance (CL/F)One intensive PK visit between 5 and 10 days of DTG initiation. At intensive PK visit, blood samples were drawn pre-dose and at 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 and 24 hours post dosingDetermined from plasma concentration-time profiles using non-compartmental methods (Phoenix WinNonlin 8.0 or current, Certara, Princeton, NJ). CL/F was calculated as Dose/AUC.
PK Parameter: Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vz/F)One intensive PK visit between 5 and 10 days of DTG initiation. At intensive PK visit, blood samples were drawn pre-dose and at 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 and 24 hours post dosingDetermined from plasma concentration-time profiles using non-compartmental methods (Phoenix WinNonlin 8.0 or current, Certara, Princeton, NJ). Vz/F was calculated as Dose/(ke x AUC).
PK Parameter: Terminal Half-life (t1/2)One intensive PK visit between 5 and 10 days of DTG initiation. At intensive PK visit, blood samples were drawn pre-dose and at 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 and 24 hours post dosingDetermined from plasma concentration-time profiles using non-compartmental methods (Phoenix WinNonlin 8.0 or current, Certara, Princeton, NJ). t1/2 was calculated as ln(2)/ke.
Percentage of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events (AEs)From treatment initiation through Week 192. AEs after that time were censored.Percentage and exact 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of participants with Grade 3 or higher AEs. AEs were graded based on the Division of AIDS Table for Grading the Severity of Adult and Pediatric Adverse Events (DAIDS AE Grading Table), Version 1.0, December 2004, Clarification August 2009 (see References). All grade 3 or higher signs, symptoms, and laboratory toxicities were included.
Summary of Changes in CD4 Percent From BaselineMeasured at Day 0, Week 24, and Week 48The median differences between CD4 percent at Week 24 and 48 minus at the Day 0 (baseline), and Interquartile Ranges (IQRs) are presented.
Summary of Changes in CD8 Count From BaselineMeasured at Day 0, Week 24, and Week 48The median differences between CD8 count at Week 24 and 48 minus at the Day 0 (baseline), and Interquartile Ranges (IQRs) are presented.
Summary of Changes in CD8 Percent From BaselineMeasured at Day 0, Week 24, and Week 48The median differences between CD8 percent at Week 24 and 48 minus at the Day 0 (baseline), and Interquartile Ranges (IQRs) are presented.
Genotypic Measures of Resistance to IntegraseAt baselineGenes were sequenced and compared to a reference sequence to identify mutations
Genotypic Measures of Resistance to Proteaseat baselineGenes were sequenced and compared to a reference sequence to identify mutations
Genotypic Measures of Resistance to Reverse Transcriptaseat baselineGenes were sequenced and compared to a reference sequence to identify mutations
Phenotypic Measures of ResistanceWhenever virological failures took place from baseline to week 192The participant viral culture is considered to be reduced susceptibility if more DTG is needed to inactivate 50% of the participant viral culture compared to the control viral specimen
Worst Case CDC HIV Classification StatusFrom baseline through Week 192Disease progression as measured by change from baseline to the worst case CDC HIV classification status
Summary of Changes in CD4 Count From BaselineMeasured at Day 0, Week 24, and Week 48The median differences between CD4 count at Week 24 and 48 minus at the Day 0 (baseline), and Interquartile Ranges (IQRs) are presented.
Percentage of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events (AEs) Assessed as Related to Study DrugFrom treatment initiation through Week 192. AEs after that time were censored.Percentage and exact 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of participants with Grade 3 or higher AEs assessed by the site investigator as related to the study drug.
Number of Participants With Permanent Discontinuation of Study Drug Due to Adverse Events (AEs) Assessed as Related to Study DrugFrom treatment initiation through Week 192. AEs after that time were censored.Number of participants with permanent discontinuation of study drug due to AEs assessed by the site investigator as related to the study drug.
Number of Participants Who DiedFrom treatment initiation through Week 192. AEs after that time were censored.Number of participants who died were summarized.
Percentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA Less Than 400 Copies/mlWeek 24 and Week 48Virologic responses were assessed at weeks 24 and 48 as percentages of participants and exact 95% Confidence Interval (CI). The virologic response or virologic failure was defined and calculated according to FDA's Snapshot algorithm.

Countries

Botswana, Brazil, Kenya, South Africa, Tanzania, Thailand, United States, Zimbabwe

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were enrolled from April 20, 2011 to February 19, 2020. Participants were recruited from 9 countries in North America, South America, Africa, and Asia.

Pre-assignment details

There was no study randomization. A participant was enrolled to a cohort based on their age at study entry.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Cohort I
Adolescents 12 to younger than 18 years of age who received DTG film-coated tablets. DTG film-coated tablets initial starting dose at \ 1 mg/kg with a maximum dose of 50 mg; orally once daily.
23
Cohort IIA
Children 6 to younger than 12 years of age who received DTG film-coated tablets. DTG film-coated tablets initial starting dose at \ 1 mg/kg with a maximum dose of 50 mg; orally once daily.
23
Cohort IIB
Children 6 to younger than 12 years of age who received DTG granules for suspension. DTG granules for suspension initial starting dose at \ 0.64 mg/kg with a maximum dose of 32 mg; orally once daily.
15
Cohort III
Children 2 to younger than 6 years of age who received DTG granules for suspension. DTG granules for suspension initial starting dose at \ 0.64 mg/kg with a maximum dose of 32 mg; orally once daily.
17
Cohort IV
Children 6 months to younger than 2 years of age who received DTG granules for suspension. DTG granules for suspension initial starting dose at \ 0.64 mg/kg with a maximum dose of 32 mg; orally once daily.
7
Cohort III-DT
Children 2 to younger than 6 years of age who received DTG dispersible tablets. DTG dispersible tablets initial starting dose of \ 0.8 mg/kg with a maximum dose of 30 mg; orally once daily.
36
Cohort IV-DT
Children 6 months to younger than 2 years of age who received DTG dispersible tablets. DTG dispersible tablets initial starting dose of \ 1.25 mg/kg with a maximum dose of 30 mg; orally once daily.
35
Cohort V-DT
Infants 4 weeks to younger than 6 months of age who received DTG dispersible tablets. DTG dispersible tablets initial starting dose of \ 1.25 mg/kg with a maximum dose of 30 mg; orally once daily.
25
Total181

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004FG005FG006FG007
Overall StudyDeath01000110
Overall StudyNot able to get to clinic11000000
Overall StudyNot willing to adhere to requirements50100002
Overall StudyPregnancy20000000
Overall StudySevere debilitation, unable to continue00000110
Overall StudySite closing22000000
Overall StudySite unable to contact participant21000020
Overall StudyVirologic failure02021312
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject10001001

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCohort IIATotalCohort V-DTCohort IV-DTCohort III-DTCohort IVCohort IIICohort IIBCohort I
Age, Continuous8.96 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.99
4.84 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.78
0.03 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.01
1.13 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.44
3.25 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.18
1.14 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.41
3.59 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1
7.73 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.79
14.26 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.79
Baseline Plasma HIV-1 RNA (copies/mL)
>=100,000
11 Participants62 Participants11 Participants14 Participants12 Participants3 Participants7 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Baseline Plasma HIV-1 RNA (copies/mL)
10,000 - <25,000
0 Participants21 Participants2 Participants4 Participants4 Participants0 Participants0 Participants3 Participants8 Participants
Baseline Plasma HIV-1 RNA (copies/mL)
1,000 - <5,000
3 Participants27 Participants7 Participants7 Participants5 Participants0 Participants2 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Baseline Plasma HIV-1 RNA (copies/mL)
25,000 - <50,000
4 Participants22 Participants1 Participants3 Participants5 Participants1 Participants2 Participants1 Participants5 Participants
Baseline Plasma HIV-1 RNA (copies/mL)
<400
0 Participants6 Participants1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Baseline Plasma HIV-1 RNA (copies/mL)
400 - <1,000
1 Participants6 Participants0 Participants1 Participants3 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Baseline Plasma HIV-1 RNA (copies/mL)
50,000 - <100,000
3 Participants22 Participants0 Participants1 Participants4 Participants1 Participants5 Participants6 Participants2 Participants
Baseline Plasma HIV-1 RNA (copies/mL)
5,000 - <10,000
1 Participants15 Participants3 Participants4 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants4 Participants
CD4 Cell Count645.0 cells/mm^31053.0 cells/mm^31916.0 cells/mm^32121.0 cells/mm^31049.5 cells/mm^31482.5 cells/mm^3900.0 cells/mm^3749.0 cells/mm^3466.0 cells/mm^3
CD4 Percent24.0 Percentage of total lymphocytes24.0 Percentage of total lymphocytes22.7 Percentage of total lymphocytes24.2 Percentage of total lymphocytes24.0 Percentage of total lymphocytes20.7 Percentage of total lymphocytes25.0 Percentage of total lymphocytes25.3 Percentage of total lymphocytes22.0 Percentage of total lymphocytes
CD8 Cell Count1089.0 cells/mm^31679.0 cells/mm^32435.0 cells/mm^32922.0 cells/mm^31725.0 cells/mm^31888.5 cells/mm^31730.0 cells/mm^31103.0 cells/mm^31009.0 cells/mm^3
CD8 Percent53.0 Percentage of total lymphocytes43.0 Percentage of total lymphocytes31.6 Percentage of total lymphocytes39.4 Percentage of total lymphocytes42.2 Percentage of total lymphocytes28.5 Percentage of total lymphocytes39.7 Percentage of total lymphocytes48.0 Percentage of total lymphocytes49.5 Percentage of total lymphocytes
Class of Prior Antiretroviral Therapy (ART)
Fusion inhibitor (FI)
0 Participants2 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Class of Prior Antiretroviral Therapy (ART)
Non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI)
13 Participants92 Participants15 Participants18 Participants14 Participants5 Participants5 Participants10 Participants12 Participants
Class of Prior Antiretroviral Therapy (ART)
Nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI)
23 Participants165 Participants23 Participants29 Participants30 Participants6 Participants17 Participants14 Participants23 Participants
Class of Prior Antiretroviral Therapy (ART)
Protease inhibitor (PI)
17 Participants138 Participants20 Participants28 Participants25 Participants5 Participants15 Participants10 Participants18 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
6 Participants37 Participants2 Participants4 Participants6 Participants1 Participants8 Participants4 Participants6 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
13 Participants129 Participants23 Participants31 Participants28 Participants6 Participants6 Participants6 Participants16 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
4 Participants15 Participants0 Participants0 Participants2 Participants0 Participants3 Participants5 Participants1 Participants
Height131.1 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14
98.9 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 32.4
59.2 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.7
71.9 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.7
93.4 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.9
71.0 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6
95.9 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.7
121.2 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.6
155.4 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.9
HIV-1 log10 RNA4.9 log10 copies/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1
4.6 log10 copies/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.1
4.6 log10 copies/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.4
4.6 log10 copies/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.1
4.5 log10 copies/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.2
4.5 log10 copies/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.4
4.9 log10 copies/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.9
4.4 log10 copies/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.8
4.3 log10 copies/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.5
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
3 Participants25 Participants3 Participants1 Participants7 Participants3 Participants2 Participants3 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
12 Participants123 Participants20 Participants30 Participants25 Participants3 Participants11 Participants10 Participants12 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
1 Participants9 Participants2 Participants2 Participants3 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
3 Participants8 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
3 Participants15 Participants0 Participants2 Participants1 Participants0 Participants2 Participants0 Participants7 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Botswana
0 Participants5 Participants2 Participants1 Participants1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Brazil
0 Participants19 Participants3 Participants2 Participants6 Participants1 Participants5 Participants2 Participants0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Kenya
0 Participants14 Participants1 Participants5 Participants8 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
South Africa
4 Participants28 Participants2 Participants4 Participants6 Participants2 Participants4 Participants6 Participants0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Tanzania
0 Participants10 Participants3 Participants3 Participants3 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Thailand
3 Participants23 Participants3 Participants1 Participants6 Participants3 Participants2 Participants2 Participants3 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Uganda
0 Participants3 Participants1 Participants2 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
16 Participants51 Participants0 Participants2 Participants3 Participants0 Participants5 Participants5 Participants20 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Zimbabwe
0 Participants28 Participants10 Participants15 Participants3 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
7 Participants86 Participants12 Participants20 Participants13 Participants5 Participants8 Participants3 Participants18 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
16 Participants95 Participants13 Participants15 Participants23 Participants2 Participants9 Participants12 Participants5 Participants
Weight30.1 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.4
19.6 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17
5.7 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.1
8.5 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.8
13.7 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.6
8.4 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2
14.4 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.9
23.0 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.6
55.1 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.6

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
EG006
affected / at risk
EG007
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 231 / 230 / 150 / 170 / 71 / 361 / 350 / 25
other
Total, other adverse events
23 / 2323 / 2315 / 1517 / 177 / 736 / 3635 / 3525 / 25
serious
Total, serious adverse events
8 / 235 / 231 / 158 / 172 / 712 / 368 / 352 / 25

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants Who Died

Number of participants who died were summarized

Time frame: From treatment initiation through Weeks 24 and 48

Population: Participants who received at least one dose of DTG and were deemed safety evaluable by the protocol team.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cohort INumber of Participants Who DiedThrough Week 480 Participants
Cohort INumber of Participants Who DiedThrough Week 240 Participants
Cohort IIANumber of Participants Who DiedThrough Week 480 Participants
Cohort IIANumber of Participants Who DiedThrough Week 240 Participants
Cohort IIBNumber of Participants Who DiedThrough Week 480 Participants
Cohort IIBNumber of Participants Who DiedThrough Week 240 Participants
Cohort IIINumber of Participants Who DiedThrough Week 240 Participants
Cohort IIINumber of Participants Who DiedThrough Week 480 Participants
Cohort IVNumber of Participants Who DiedThrough Week 240 Participants
Cohort IVNumber of Participants Who DiedThrough Week 480 Participants
Cohort III-DTNumber of Participants Who DiedThrough Week 241 Participants
Cohort III-DTNumber of Participants Who DiedThrough Week 481 Participants
Cohort IV-DTNumber of Participants Who DiedThrough Week 241 Participants
Cohort IV-DTNumber of Participants Who DiedThrough Week 481 Participants
Cohort V-DTNumber of Participants Who DiedThrough Week 240 Participants
Cohort V-DTNumber of Participants Who DiedThrough Week 480 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Permanent Discontinuation of Study Drug Due to Adverse Events (AEs) Assessed as Related to Study Drug

Number of participants with permanent discontinuation of study drug due to AEs assessed by the site investigator as related to the study drug.

Time frame: From treatment initiation through Weeks 24 and 48

Population: Participants who received at least one dose of DTG and were deemed safety evaluable by the protocol team.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cohort INumber of Participants With Permanent Discontinuation of Study Drug Due to Adverse Events (AEs) Assessed as Related to Study DrugThrough Week 240 Participants
Cohort INumber of Participants With Permanent Discontinuation of Study Drug Due to Adverse Events (AEs) Assessed as Related to Study DrugThrough Week 480 Participants
Cohort IIANumber of Participants With Permanent Discontinuation of Study Drug Due to Adverse Events (AEs) Assessed as Related to Study DrugThrough Week 240 Participants
Cohort IIANumber of Participants With Permanent Discontinuation of Study Drug Due to Adverse Events (AEs) Assessed as Related to Study DrugThrough Week 480 Participants
Cohort IIBNumber of Participants With Permanent Discontinuation of Study Drug Due to Adverse Events (AEs) Assessed as Related to Study DrugThrough Week 240 Participants
Cohort IIBNumber of Participants With Permanent Discontinuation of Study Drug Due to Adverse Events (AEs) Assessed as Related to Study DrugThrough Week 480 Participants
Cohort IIINumber of Participants With Permanent Discontinuation of Study Drug Due to Adverse Events (AEs) Assessed as Related to Study DrugThrough Week 240 Participants
Cohort IIINumber of Participants With Permanent Discontinuation of Study Drug Due to Adverse Events (AEs) Assessed as Related to Study DrugThrough Week 480 Participants
Cohort IVNumber of Participants With Permanent Discontinuation of Study Drug Due to Adverse Events (AEs) Assessed as Related to Study DrugThrough Week 240 Participants
Cohort IVNumber of Participants With Permanent Discontinuation of Study Drug Due to Adverse Events (AEs) Assessed as Related to Study DrugThrough Week 480 Participants
Cohort III-DTNumber of Participants With Permanent Discontinuation of Study Drug Due to Adverse Events (AEs) Assessed as Related to Study DrugThrough Week 240 Participants
Cohort III-DTNumber of Participants With Permanent Discontinuation of Study Drug Due to Adverse Events (AEs) Assessed as Related to Study DrugThrough Week 480 Participants
Cohort IV-DTNumber of Participants With Permanent Discontinuation of Study Drug Due to Adverse Events (AEs) Assessed as Related to Study DrugThrough Week 480 Participants
Cohort IV-DTNumber of Participants With Permanent Discontinuation of Study Drug Due to Adverse Events (AEs) Assessed as Related to Study DrugThrough Week 240 Participants
Cohort V-DTNumber of Participants With Permanent Discontinuation of Study Drug Due to Adverse Events (AEs) Assessed as Related to Study DrugThrough Week 240 Participants
Cohort V-DTNumber of Participants With Permanent Discontinuation of Study Drug Due to Adverse Events (AEs) Assessed as Related to Study DrugThrough Week 480 Participants
Primary

Percentage of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events (AEs)

All grade 3 or higher signs/symptoms, diagnoses, and laboratory AEs were included. AE grading was based on DAIDS AE Grading Table, Version 1.0, December 2004 (Clarification, August 2009). A 2-sided 95% Confidence Interval (CI) was calculated for the percentage using the binominal exact method.

Time frame: From treatment initiation through Weeks 24 and 48

Population: Participants who received at least one dose of DTG and were deemed safety evaluable by the protocol team.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Cohort IPercentage of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events (AEs)Through Week 244.3 percentage of participants
Cohort IPercentage of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events (AEs)Through Week 488.7 percentage of participants
Cohort IIAPercentage of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events (AEs)Through Week 248.7 percentage of participants
Cohort IIAPercentage of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events (AEs)Through Week 4817.4 percentage of participants
Cohort IIBPercentage of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events (AEs)Through Week 246.7 percentage of participants
Cohort IIBPercentage of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events (AEs)Through Week 4813.3 percentage of participants
Cohort IIIPercentage of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events (AEs)Through Week 2429.4 percentage of participants
Cohort IIIPercentage of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events (AEs)Through Week 4835.3 percentage of participants
Cohort IVPercentage of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events (AEs)Through Week 2457.1 percentage of participants
Cohort IVPercentage of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events (AEs)Through Week 4857.1 percentage of participants
Cohort III-DTPercentage of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events (AEs)Through Week 2438.9 percentage of participants
Cohort III-DTPercentage of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events (AEs)Through Week 4841.7 percentage of participants
Cohort IV-DTPercentage of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events (AEs)Through Week 4851.4 percentage of participants
Cohort IV-DTPercentage of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events (AEs)Through Week 2442.9 percentage of participants
Cohort V-DTPercentage of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events (AEs)Through Week 2460 percentage of participants
Cohort V-DTPercentage of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events (AEs)Through Week 4864 percentage of participants
Primary

Percentage of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events (AEs) Assessed as Related to Study Drug

All grade 3 or higher signs/symptoms, diagnoses, and laboratory AEs were included. AE grading was based on DAIDS AE Grading Table, Version 1.0, December 2004 (Clarification, August 2009). A 2-sided 95% Confidence Interval (CI) was calculated for the percentage using the binominal exact method.

Time frame: From treatment initiation through Weeks 24 and 48

Population: Participants who received at least one dose of DTG and were deemed safety evaluable by the protocol team.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Cohort IPercentage of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events (AEs) Assessed as Related to Study DrugThrough Week 240 percentage of participants
Cohort IPercentage of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events (AEs) Assessed as Related to Study DrugThrough Week 480 percentage of participants
Cohort IIAPercentage of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events (AEs) Assessed as Related to Study DrugThrough Week 240 percentage of participants
Cohort IIAPercentage of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events (AEs) Assessed as Related to Study DrugThrough Week 480 percentage of participants
Cohort IIBPercentage of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events (AEs) Assessed as Related to Study DrugThrough Week 240 percentage of participants
Cohort IIBPercentage of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events (AEs) Assessed as Related to Study DrugThrough Week 480 percentage of participants
Cohort IIIPercentage of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events (AEs) Assessed as Related to Study DrugThrough Week 240 percentage of participants
Cohort IIIPercentage of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events (AEs) Assessed as Related to Study DrugThrough Week 480 percentage of participants
Cohort IVPercentage of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events (AEs) Assessed as Related to Study DrugThrough Week 2414.3 percentage of participants
Cohort IVPercentage of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events (AEs) Assessed as Related to Study DrugThrough Week 4814.3 percentage of participants
Cohort III-DTPercentage of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events (AEs) Assessed as Related to Study DrugThrough Week 240 percentage of participants
Cohort III-DTPercentage of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events (AEs) Assessed as Related to Study DrugThrough Week 480 percentage of participants
Cohort IV-DTPercentage of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events (AEs) Assessed as Related to Study DrugThrough Week 480 percentage of participants
Cohort IV-DTPercentage of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events (AEs) Assessed as Related to Study DrugThrough Week 240 percentage of participants
Cohort V-DTPercentage of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events (AEs) Assessed as Related to Study DrugThrough Week 240 percentage of participants
Cohort V-DTPercentage of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events (AEs) Assessed as Related to Study DrugThrough Week 480 percentage of participants
Primary

PK Parameter: Area-under-the-curve From 0 to 24 Hours (AUC0-24)

Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined from plasma concentration-time profiles using non-compartmental methods (Phoenix WinNonlin 8.0 or current, Certara, Princeton, NJ). AUC0-24 was determined using linear up-log down estimation in WinNonlin.

Time frame: One intensive PK visit between 5 and 10 days of DTG initiation. At intensive PK visit, blood samples were drawn pre-dose and at 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 and 24 hours post dosing

Population: Participants with intensive pharmacokinetic (PK) data at the proposed dose for Cohorts I, IIA, III-DT, IV-DT, and V-DT.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort IPK Parameter: Area-under-the-curve From 0 to 24 Hours (AUC0-24)52.98 hr*mg/LStandard Deviation 23.11
Cohort IIAPK Parameter: Area-under-the-curve From 0 to 24 Hours (AUC0-24)68.33 hr*mg/LStandard Deviation 43.33
Cohort IIBPK Parameter: Area-under-the-curve From 0 to 24 Hours (AUC0-24)63.16 hr*mg/LStandard Deviation 37.77
Cohort IIIPK Parameter: Area-under-the-curve From 0 to 24 Hours (AUC0-24)82.67 hr*mg/LStandard Deviation 47.05
Cohort IVPK Parameter: Area-under-the-curve From 0 to 24 Hours (AUC0-24)71.45 hr*mg/LStandard Deviation 28.21
Secondary

Genotypic Measures of Resistance to Integrase

Genes were sequenced and compared to a reference sequence to identify mutations

Time frame: At baseline

Population: All participants with a confirmed decrease in HIV RNA of \< 1.0 log10 at or after week 12 unless the HIV RNA is \< 400 copies/mL, or a confirmed HIV RNA \> 400 copies/mL starting at Week 24 or beyond on 2 consecutive measurements at least 1 week and within 4 weeks apart

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to IntegraseA128T2 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to IntegraseGene not found3 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to IntegraseL74I7 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to IntegraseL74I,S230N1 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to IntegraseS230N1 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to IntegraseT97A1 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to IntegraseV151I1 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to IntegraseNone40 Participants
Secondary

Genotypic Measures of Resistance to Integrase

Genes were sequenced and compared to a reference sequence to identify mutations

Time frame: at virological failure visit at or prior to Week 192

Population: All participants with a confirmed decrease in HIV RNA of \< 1.0 log10 at or after week 12 unless the HIV RNA is \< 400 copies/mL, or a confirmed HIV RNA \> 400 copies/mL starting at Week 24 or beyond on 2 consecutive measurements at least 1 week and within 4 weeks apart

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to IntegraseA128T1 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to IntegraseA128T,S153AFSV1 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to IntegraseE138AEKT,E138T,S147G,S147GS,R263K,R263KR1 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to IntegraseE138K,Q148K1 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to IntegraseE157Q1 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to IntegraseE92EG,T97A,N155H,N155HN1 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to IntegraseE92EQ,G118GR1 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to IntegraseH51HY1 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to IntegraseL74I4 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to IntegraseL74I,G118R1 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to IntegraseL74I,S230N1 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to IntegraseL74M,G118R1 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to IntegraseR263K1 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to IntegraseS230N1 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to IntegraseT66I,G118R,E138A1 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to IntegraseT66I,L74I,G118R1 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to IntegraseT97A,G118R,E138EK,S147G,V151I,N155H1 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to Integrasemissing11 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to IntegraseNone25 Participants
Secondary

Genotypic Measures of Resistance to Protease

Genes were sequenced and compared to a reference sequence to identify mutations

Time frame: at baseline

Population: all participants with a confirmed decrease in HIV RNA of \< 1.0 log10 at or after week 12 unless the HIV RNA is \< 400 copies/mL, or a confirmed HIV RNA \> 400 copies/mL starting at Week 24 or beyond on 2 consecutive measurements at least 1 week and within 4 weeks apart

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to ProteaseA71T1 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to ProteaseD30N,A71T,N88D1 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to ProteaseD30N,M46I,Q58EQ,A71T,N88D1 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to ProteaseI84V1 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to ProteaseK20I2 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to ProteaseK20I,V82I1 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to ProteaseK20R8 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to ProteaseK20R,A71T1 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to ProteaseK20R,L33F,M46I,I50V,I54V,T74P,V82A1 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to ProteaseK20R,T74S1 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to ProteaseK20R,T74S,V82A1 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to ProteaseK20T,V82I1 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to ProteaseK43T,A71T,V82A1 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to ProteaseL10I,K20KR,M46LM,I54IL,A71AV,V82AFSV3 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to ProteaseL10I1 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to ProteaseL10V2 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to ProteaseT74S3 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to ProteaseNone26 Participants
Secondary

Genotypic Measures of Resistance to Protease

Genes were sequenced and compared to a reference sequence to identify mutations

Time frame: at virological failures at or prior to Week 192

Population: all participants with a confirmed decrease in HIV RNA of \< 1.0 log10 at or after week 12 unless the HIV RNA is \< 400 copies/mL, or a confirmed HIV RNA \> 400 copies/mL starting at Week 24 or beyond on 2 consecutive measurements at least 1 week and within 4 weeks apart

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to ProteaseA71T2 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to ProteaseD30N,A71T,N88D1 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to ProteaseD30N,M46I,Q58E,Q58EQ,A71T,N88D1 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to ProteaseI84V1 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to ProteaseK20I1 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to ProteaseK20R7 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to ProteaseK20R,T74S1 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to ProteaseK20R,T74S,V82A1 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to ProteaseK20T,V82I1 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to ProteaseL10I6 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to ProteaseL10I,K20R1 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to ProteaseL10I,K43T,I54V,A71T,V82A1 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to ProteaseL10I,L10IV1 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to ProteaseL10IL,K20KR,L33FL,M46IM,I50IV,I54IV,T74PT,V82AV1 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to ProteaseL10V2 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to ProteaseL10V,K20IV,K20V1 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to ProteaseT74S3 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to ProteaseV11IV,K20I,V82I1 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to Proteasemissing8 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to ProteaseNone15 Participants
Secondary

Genotypic Measures of Resistance to Reverse Transcriptase

Genes were sequenced and compared to a reference sequence to identify mutations

Time frame: at virologic failure at or prior to Week 192

Population: all participants with a confirmed decrease in HIV RNA of \< 1.0 log10 at or after week 12 unless the HIV RNA is \< 400 copies/mL, or a confirmed HIV RNA \> 400 copies/mL starting at Week 24 or beyond on 2 consecutive measurements at least 1 week and within 4 weeks apart

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to Reverse TranscriptaseM41L,T215FL1 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to Reverse Transcriptase101i,V179I,M184V1 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to Reverse TranscriptaseA62V,K65R,S68G,K70R,V75I,F77L,K101Q,K103N,F116Y,Q151M,P225H1 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to Reverse TranscriptaseD67N,K219Q,N348I1 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to Reverse TranscriptaseE138A1 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to Reverse TranscriptaseE44D,E44DE,K103N,M184V1 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to Reverse TranscriptaseE44DE1 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to Reverse TranscriptaseK103KN,K103N,M184V1 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to Reverse TranscriptaseK103N4 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to Reverse TranscriptaseK103N,M184V1 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to Reverse TranscriptaseK103N,V179I1 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to Reverse TranscriptaseV179E,P225H1 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to Reverse TranscriptaseK103N,V179I,M184V1 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to Reverse TranscriptaseK103S,M184V,G190A,Y318F1 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to Reverse TranscriptaseK238R2 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to Reverse TranscriptaseK238R,M41LM,D67DN,T69NT,K70KR,L74IL,A98AG,M184MV,T215FIST,K219Q,M230IM1 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to Reverse TranscriptaseL74IL,L74V,K103N,E138G,M184V,M230L1 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to Reverse TranscriptaseM184V3 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to Reverse TranscriptaseM184V,H221Y1 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to Reverse TranscriptaseM184V,K238R1 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to Reverse TranscriptaseV179D,V179DV,G190A,G190AG1 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to Reverse TranscriptaseM41LM,M184V,S68G,S68GS,Y181CY,M184MV1 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to Reverse TranscriptaseS68G,V106I,K238R1 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to Reverse TranscriptaseS68G,V90I,K103N,V179I,M184V1 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to Reverse TranscriptaseS68GS,K103KN,K238KR,K238R1 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to Reverse TranscriptaseT69NT,K103N,P225H1 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to Reverse TranscriptaseV106M,Y181C,P236LP1 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to Reverse TranscriptaseV179I1 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to Reverse TranscriptaseV179I,M184V1 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to Reverse TranscriptaseV179I,M184V,G190A,K219R1 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to Reverse TranscriptaseV179I,M184V,K238R1 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to Reverse TranscriptaseV179I,M184V,Y188L1 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to Reverse TranscriptaseV179S,M184V1 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to Reverse TranscriptaseV75M,K103N1 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to Reverse TranscriptaseV90I1 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to Reverse Transcriptasemissing6 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to Reverse TranscriptaseNone9 Participants
Secondary

Genotypic Measures of Resistance to Reverse Transcriptase

Genes were sequenced and compared to a reference sequence to identify mutations

Time frame: at baseline

Population: all participants with a confirmed decrease in HIV RNA of \< 1.0 log10 at or after week 12 unless the HIV RNA is \< 400 copies/mL, or a confirmed HIV RNA \> 400 copies/mL starting at Week 24 or beyond on 2 consecutive measurements at least 1 week and within 4 weeks apart

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to Reverse TranscriptaseV179I1 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to Reverse TranscriptaseA62V,K65R,S68G,K70R,V75I,F77L,K101Q,K103N,F116Y,Q151M,P225H1 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to Reverse TranscriptaseD67DN,K238R1 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to Reverse TranscriptaseD67DN,V179I,V179IV,M184V,K219Q,N348I1 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to Reverse TranscriptaseE138A1 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to Reverse TranscriptaseE44D,K103N,M184V1 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to Reverse TranscriptaseK103N4 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to Reverse TranscriptaseK103N,M184V1 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to Reverse TranscriptaseK103N,M184V,M184MV1 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to Reverse TranscriptaseK103N,P225H1 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to Reverse TranscriptaseK103N,V179I1 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to Reverse TranscriptaseK103N,V179I,M184V1 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to Reverse TranscriptaseK103N,Y181C1 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to Reverse TranscriptaseK103S,V179I,G190A,Y318F1 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to Reverse TranscriptaseK65R,V106M,G190A1 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to Reverse TranscriptaseK70KR,T215F,T215FIST,K238R1 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to Reverse TranscriptaseL74LV,Y181CY,M184V1 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to Reverse TranscriptaseL74V,K103N,E138G,M184V,M230L1 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to Reverse TranscriptaseL74V,V106M,Y181C1 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to Reverse TranscriptaseM184V2 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to Reverse TranscriptaseM184V,H221Y1 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to Reverse TranscriptaseM184V,K238R1 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to Reverse TranscriptaseM41L,D67N,T69N,K70R,L74I,A98G,M184V,T215F,K219Q,K238R1 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to Reverse TranscriptaseM41L,K101E,V179I,M184V,G190A,T215F1 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to Reverse TranscriptaseM41L,T215L1 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to Reverse TranscriptaseS68G,K103N,E138Q,M184V,Y318F1 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to Reverse TranscriptaseS68G,V106I,K238R1 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to Reverse TranscriptaseS68G,V90I,K103N,V179I1 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to Reverse TranscriptaseT69D1 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to Reverse TranscriptaseV118I,E138A1 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to Reverse TranscriptaseV118IV,V179I,M184V1 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to Reverse TranscriptaseV179E,P225H1 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to Reverse TranscriptaseV179I,M184V2 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to Reverse TranscriptaseV179I,M184V,G190A,K219R1 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to Reverse TranscriptaseV179I,M184V,K238R1 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to Reverse TranscriptaseV179I,M184V,Y188L1 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to Reverse TranscriptaseV179S1 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to Reverse TranscriptaseV75M,K103N1 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to Reverse TranscriptaseV90I2 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to Reverse TranscriptaseY181C1 Participants
Cohort IGenotypic Measures of Resistance to Reverse TranscriptaseNone10 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Who Died

Number of participants who died were summarized.

Time frame: From treatment initiation through Week 192. AEs after that time were censored.

Population: All participants

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cohort INumber of Participants Who Died0 Participants
Cohort IIANumber of Participants Who Died1 Participants
Cohort IIBNumber of Participants Who Died0 Participants
Cohort IIINumber of Participants Who Died0 Participants
Cohort IVNumber of Participants Who Died0 Participants
Cohort III-DTNumber of Participants Who Died1 Participants
Cohort IV-DTNumber of Participants Who Died1 Participants
Cohort V-DTNumber of Participants Who Died0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Permanent Discontinuation of Study Drug Due to Adverse Events (AEs) Assessed as Related to Study Drug

Number of participants with permanent discontinuation of study drug due to AEs assessed by the site investigator as related to the study drug.

Time frame: From treatment initiation through Week 192. AEs after that time were censored.

Population: All participants

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cohort INumber of Participants With Permanent Discontinuation of Study Drug Due to Adverse Events (AEs) Assessed as Related to Study Drug0 Participants
Cohort IIANumber of Participants With Permanent Discontinuation of Study Drug Due to Adverse Events (AEs) Assessed as Related to Study Drug0 Participants
Cohort IIBNumber of Participants With Permanent Discontinuation of Study Drug Due to Adverse Events (AEs) Assessed as Related to Study Drug0 Participants
Cohort IIINumber of Participants With Permanent Discontinuation of Study Drug Due to Adverse Events (AEs) Assessed as Related to Study Drug0 Participants
Cohort IVNumber of Participants With Permanent Discontinuation of Study Drug Due to Adverse Events (AEs) Assessed as Related to Study Drug0 Participants
Cohort III-DTNumber of Participants With Permanent Discontinuation of Study Drug Due to Adverse Events (AEs) Assessed as Related to Study Drug0 Participants
Cohort IV-DTNumber of Participants With Permanent Discontinuation of Study Drug Due to Adverse Events (AEs) Assessed as Related to Study Drug0 Participants
Cohort V-DTNumber of Participants With Permanent Discontinuation of Study Drug Due to Adverse Events (AEs) Assessed as Related to Study Drug0 Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events (AEs)

Percentage and exact 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of participants with Grade 3 or higher AEs. AEs were graded based on the Division of AIDS Table for Grading the Severity of Adult and Pediatric Adverse Events (DAIDS AE Grading Table), Version 1.0, December 2004, Clarification August 2009 (see References). All grade 3 or higher signs, symptoms, and laboratory toxicities were included.

Time frame: From treatment initiation through Week 192. AEs after that time were censored.

Population: All participants

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cohort IPercentage of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events (AEs)34.8 percentage of participants
Cohort IIAPercentage of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events (AEs)30.4 percentage of participants
Cohort IIBPercentage of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events (AEs)20 percentage of participants
Cohort IIIPercentage of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events (AEs)52.9 percentage of participants
Cohort IVPercentage of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events (AEs)57.1 percentage of participants
Cohort III-DTPercentage of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events (AEs)58.3 percentage of participants
Cohort IV-DTPercentage of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events (AEs)51.4 percentage of participants
Cohort V-DTPercentage of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events (AEs)64 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events (AEs) Assessed as Related to Study Drug

Percentage and exact 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of participants with Grade 3 or higher AEs assessed by the site investigator as related to the study drug.

Time frame: From treatment initiation through Week 192. AEs after that time were censored.

Population: All participants

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cohort IPercentage of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events (AEs) Assessed as Related to Study Drug0 percentage of participants
Cohort IIAPercentage of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events (AEs) Assessed as Related to Study Drug0 percentage of participants
Cohort IIBPercentage of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events (AEs) Assessed as Related to Study Drug0 percentage of participants
Cohort IIIPercentage of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events (AEs) Assessed as Related to Study Drug0 percentage of participants
Cohort IVPercentage of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events (AEs) Assessed as Related to Study Drug14.3 percentage of participants
Cohort III-DTPercentage of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events (AEs) Assessed as Related to Study Drug0 percentage of participants
Cohort IV-DTPercentage of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events (AEs) Assessed as Related to Study Drug0 percentage of participants
Cohort V-DTPercentage of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events (AEs) Assessed as Related to Study Drug0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA Less Than 400 Copies/ml

Virologic responses were assessed at weeks 24 and 48 as percentages of participants and exact 95% Confidence Interval (CI). The virologic response or virologic failure was defined and calculated according to FDA's Snapshot algorithm.

Time frame: Week 24 and Week 48

Population: Participants who received at least one dose of DTG.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Cohort IPercentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA Less Than 400 Copies/mlWeek 2482.6 percentage of participants
Cohort IPercentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA Less Than 400 Copies/mlWeek 4873.9 percentage of participants
Cohort IIAPercentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA Less Than 400 Copies/mlWeek 2478.3 percentage of participants
Cohort IIAPercentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA Less Than 400 Copies/mlWeek 4878.3 percentage of participants
Cohort IIBPercentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA Less Than 400 Copies/mlWeek 24100 percentage of participants
Cohort IIBPercentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA Less Than 400 Copies/mlWeek 4893.3 percentage of participants
Cohort IIIPercentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA Less Than 400 Copies/mlWeek 2488.2 percentage of participants
Cohort IIIPercentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA Less Than 400 Copies/mlWeek 4894.1 percentage of participants
Cohort IVPercentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA Less Than 400 Copies/mlWeek 2471.4 percentage of participants
Cohort IVPercentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA Less Than 400 Copies/mlWeek 4871.4 percentage of participants
Cohort III-DTPercentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA Less Than 400 Copies/mlWeek 2486.1 percentage of participants
Cohort III-DTPercentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA Less Than 400 Copies/mlWeek 4886.1 percentage of participants
Cohort IV-DTPercentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA Less Than 400 Copies/mlWeek 4885.7 percentage of participants
Cohort IV-DTPercentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA Less Than 400 Copies/mlWeek 2488.6 percentage of participants
Cohort V-DTPercentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA Less Than 400 Copies/mlWeek 2468 percentage of participants
Cohort V-DTPercentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA Less Than 400 Copies/mlWeek 4872 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA Less Than 50 Copies/ml

Virologic responses were assessed at weeks 24 and 48 as percentages of participants and exact 95% Confidence Interval (CI), The virologic response or virologic failure was defined and calculated according to FDA's Snapshot algorithm.

Time frame: Week 24 and Week 48

Population: Participants who received at least one dose of DTG.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Cohort IPercentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA Less Than 50 Copies/mlWeek 2469.6 percentage of participants
Cohort IPercentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA Less Than 50 Copies/mlWeek 4860.9 percentage of participants
Cohort IIAPercentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA Less Than 50 Copies/mlWeek 2460.9 percentage of participants
Cohort IIAPercentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA Less Than 50 Copies/mlWeek 4869.6 percentage of participants
Cohort IIBPercentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA Less Than 50 Copies/mlWeek 2493.3 percentage of participants
Cohort IIBPercentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA Less Than 50 Copies/mlWeek 4893.3 percentage of participants
Cohort IIIPercentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA Less Than 50 Copies/mlWeek 2458.8 percentage of participants
Cohort IIIPercentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA Less Than 50 Copies/mlWeek 4864.7 percentage of participants
Cohort IVPercentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA Less Than 50 Copies/mlWeek 2442.9 percentage of participants
Cohort IVPercentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA Less Than 50 Copies/mlWeek 4842.9 percentage of participants
Cohort III-DTPercentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA Less Than 50 Copies/mlWeek 2461.1 percentage of participants
Cohort III-DTPercentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA Less Than 50 Copies/mlWeek 4869.4 percentage of participants
Cohort IV-DTPercentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA Less Than 50 Copies/mlWeek 4865.7 percentage of participants
Cohort IV-DTPercentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA Less Than 50 Copies/mlWeek 2451.4 percentage of participants
Cohort V-DTPercentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA Less Than 50 Copies/mlWeek 2432 percentage of participants
Cohort V-DTPercentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA Less Than 50 Copies/mlWeek 4836 percentage of participants
Secondary

Phenotypic Measures of Resistance

The participant viral culture is considered to be reduced susceptibility if more DTG is needed to inactivate 50% of the participant viral culture compared to the control viral specimen

Time frame: Whenever virological failures took place from baseline to week 192

Population: Protocol defined virological failure population for which drug susceptibility was measured

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cohort IPhenotypic Measures of Resistancemissing1 Participants
Cohort IPhenotypic Measures of ResistanceReduced susceptibility to DTG2 Participants
Cohort IPhenotypic Measures of ResistanceSensitive to DTG8 Participants
Cohort IIAPhenotypic Measures of ResistanceSensitive to DTG4 Participants
Cohort IIAPhenotypic Measures of Resistancemissing1 Participants
Cohort IIAPhenotypic Measures of ResistanceReduced susceptibility to DTG0 Participants
Cohort IIBPhenotypic Measures of Resistancemissing0 Participants
Cohort IIBPhenotypic Measures of ResistanceReduced susceptibility to DTG1 Participants
Cohort IIBPhenotypic Measures of ResistanceSensitive to DTG0 Participants
Cohort IIIPhenotypic Measures of Resistancemissing1 Participants
Cohort IIIPhenotypic Measures of ResistanceSensitive to DTG2 Participants
Cohort IIIPhenotypic Measures of ResistanceReduced susceptibility to DTG0 Participants
Cohort IVPhenotypic Measures of ResistanceSensitive to DTG0 Participants
Cohort IVPhenotypic Measures of Resistancemissing2 Participants
Cohort IVPhenotypic Measures of ResistanceReduced susceptibility to DTG1 Participants
Cohort III-DTPhenotypic Measures of ResistanceReduced susceptibility to DTG1 Participants
Cohort III-DTPhenotypic Measures of ResistanceSensitive to DTG5 Participants
Cohort III-DTPhenotypic Measures of Resistancemissing4 Participants
Cohort IV-DTPhenotypic Measures of ResistanceSensitive to DTG4 Participants
Cohort IV-DTPhenotypic Measures of ResistanceReduced susceptibility to DTG0 Participants
Cohort IV-DTPhenotypic Measures of Resistancemissing7 Participants
Cohort V-DTPhenotypic Measures of ResistanceSensitive to DTG9 Participants
Cohort V-DTPhenotypic Measures of Resistancemissing3 Participants
Cohort V-DTPhenotypic Measures of ResistanceReduced susceptibility to DTG0 Participants
Secondary

PK Parameter: Apparent Clearance (CL/F)

Determined from plasma concentration-time profiles using non-compartmental methods (Phoenix WinNonlin 8.0 or current, Certara, Princeton, NJ). CL/F was calculated as Dose/AUC.

Time frame: One intensive PK visit between 5 and 10 days of DTG initiation. At intensive PK visit, blood samples were drawn pre-dose and at 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 and 24 hours post dosing

Population: Participants with intensive pharmacokinetic (PK) data at the proposed dose for Cohorts I, IIA, III-DT, IV-DT, and V-DT.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort IPK Parameter: Apparent Clearance (CL/F)1.29 L/hStandard Deviation 1.03
Cohort IIAPK Parameter: Apparent Clearance (CL/F)1.11 L/hStandard Deviation 0.92
Cohort IIBPK Parameter: Apparent Clearance (CL/F)0.49 L/hStandard Deviation 0.31
Cohort IIIPK Parameter: Apparent Clearance (CL/F)0.23 L/hStandard Deviation 0.11
Cohort IVPK Parameter: Apparent Clearance (CL/F)0.11 L/hStandard Deviation 0.05
Secondary

PK Parameter: Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vz/F)

Determined from plasma concentration-time profiles using non-compartmental methods (Phoenix WinNonlin 8.0 or current, Certara, Princeton, NJ). Vz/F was calculated as Dose/(ke x AUC).

Time frame: One intensive PK visit between 5 and 10 days of DTG initiation. At intensive PK visit, blood samples were drawn pre-dose and at 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 and 24 hours post dosing

Population: Participants with intensive pharmacokinetic (PK) data at the proposed dose for Cohorts I, IIA, III-DT, IV-DT, and V-DT.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort IPK Parameter: Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vz/F)21.95 LStandard Deviation 13.71
Cohort IIAPK Parameter: Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vz/F)19.11 LStandard Deviation 16.51
Cohort IIBPK Parameter: Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vz/F)5.75 LStandard Deviation 3.66
Cohort IIIPK Parameter: Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vz/F)3.19 LStandard Deviation 1.5
Cohort IVPK Parameter: Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vz/F)2.37 LStandard Deviation 1.04
Secondary

PK Parameter: Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax)

Determined from plasma concentration-time profiles using non-compartmental methods (Phoenix WinNonlin 8.0 or current, Certara, Princeton, NJ). Cmax was taken directly from the observed concentration-time data.

Time frame: One intensive PK visit between 5 and 10 days of DTG initiation. At intensive PK visit, blood samples were drawn pre-dose and at 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 and 24 hours post dosing

Population: Participants with intensive pharmacokinetic (PK) data at the proposed dose for Cohorts I, IIA, III-DT, IV-DT, and V-DT.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort IPK Parameter: Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax)3945.97 ng/mLStandard Deviation 1499.34
Cohort IIAPK Parameter: Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax)5111.10 ng/mLStandard Deviation 2459.92
Cohort IIBPK Parameter: Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax)5530.16 ng/mLStandard Deviation 2466.62
Cohort IIIPK Parameter: Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax)6256.67 ng/mLStandard Deviation 2508.57
Cohort IVPK Parameter: Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax)4832.58 ng/mLStandard Deviation 1679.69
Secondary

PK Parameter: Minimum Plasma Concentration (Cmin)

Determined from plasma concentration-time profiles using non-compartmental methods (Phoenix WinNonlin 8.0 or current, Certara, Princeton, NJ) and were performed in real-time. Cmin was taken directly from the observed concentration-time data.

Time frame: One intensive PK visit between 5 and 10 days of DTG initiation. At intensive PK visit, blood samples were drawn pre-dose and at 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 and 24 hours post dosing

Population: Participants with intensive pharmacokinetic (PK) data at the proposed dose for Cohorts I, IIA, III-DT, IV-DT, and V-DT.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort IPK Parameter: Minimum Plasma Concentration (Cmin)1193.94 ng/mLStandard Deviation 668.76
Cohort IIAPK Parameter: Minimum Plasma Concentration (Cmin)1155.52 ng/mLStandard Deviation 1152.98
Cohort IIBPK Parameter: Minimum Plasma Concentration (Cmin)757.92 ng/mLStandard Deviation 439.83
Cohort IIIPK Parameter: Minimum Plasma Concentration (Cmin)1343.74 ng/mLStandard Deviation 1370.79
Cohort IVPK Parameter: Minimum Plasma Concentration (Cmin)1213.68 ng/mLStandard Deviation 886.21
Secondary

PK Parameter: Plasma Concentration Observed at End of 24 Hour Dosing Interval (C24h)

Determined from plasma concentration-time profiles using non-compartmental methods (Phoenix WinNonlin 8.0 or current, Certara, Princeton, NJ). C24h was taken directly from the observed concentration-time data or estimated using the elimination rate constant.

Time frame: One intensive PK visit between 5 and 10 days of DTG initiation. At intensive PK visit, blood samples were drawn pre-dose and at 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 and 24 hours post dosing

Population: Participants with intensive pharmacokinetic (PK) data at the proposed dose for Cohorts I, IIA, III-DT, IV-DT, and V-DT.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort IPK Parameter: Plasma Concentration Observed at End of 24 Hour Dosing Interval (C24h)1145.36 ng/mLStandard Deviation 659.65
Cohort IIAPK Parameter: Plasma Concentration Observed at End of 24 Hour Dosing Interval (C24h)1475.46 ng/mLStandard Deviation 1139.52
Cohort IIBPK Parameter: Plasma Concentration Observed at End of 24 Hour Dosing Interval (C24h)1065.12 ng/mLStandard Deviation 1112.46
Cohort IIIPK Parameter: Plasma Concentration Observed at End of 24 Hour Dosing Interval (C24h)1488.24 ng/mLStandard Deviation 1175.44
Cohort IVPK Parameter: Plasma Concentration Observed at End of 24 Hour Dosing Interval (C24h)1765.19 ng/mLStandard Deviation 929.97
Secondary

PK Parameter: Plasma Concentration Observed Immediately to Dosing of 24 Hour Dosing Interval (C0h)

Determined from plasma concentration-time profiles using non-compartmental methods (Phoenix WinNonlin 8.0 or current, Certara, Princeton, NJ). C0h was taken directly from the observed concentration-time data.

Time frame: One intensive PK visit between 5 and 10 days of DTG initiation. At intensive PK visit, blood samples were drawn pre-dose and at 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 and 24 hours post dosing

Population: Participants with intensive pharmacokinetic (PK) data at the proposed dose for Cohorts I, IIA, III-DT, IV-DT, and V-DT.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort IPK Parameter: Plasma Concentration Observed Immediately to Dosing of 24 Hour Dosing Interval (C0h)1429.09 ng/mLStandard Deviation 738.69
Cohort IIAPK Parameter: Plasma Concentration Observed Immediately to Dosing of 24 Hour Dosing Interval (C0h)1508.44 ng/mLStandard Deviation 1271.93
Cohort IIBPK Parameter: Plasma Concentration Observed Immediately to Dosing of 24 Hour Dosing Interval (C0h)944.22 ng/mLStandard Deviation 549.36
Cohort IIIPK Parameter: Plasma Concentration Observed Immediately to Dosing of 24 Hour Dosing Interval (C0h)1584.29 ng/mLStandard Deviation 1388.27
Cohort IVPK Parameter: Plasma Concentration Observed Immediately to Dosing of 24 Hour Dosing Interval (C0h)1376.15 ng/mLStandard Deviation 1132.28
Secondary

PK Parameter: Terminal Half-life (t1/2)

Determined from plasma concentration-time profiles using non-compartmental methods (Phoenix WinNonlin 8.0 or current, Certara, Princeton, NJ). t1/2 was calculated as ln(2)/ke.

Time frame: One intensive PK visit between 5 and 10 days of DTG initiation. At intensive PK visit, blood samples were drawn pre-dose and at 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 and 24 hours post dosing

Population: Participants with intensive pharmacokinetic (PK) data at the proposed dose for Cohorts I, IIA, III-DT, IV-DT, and V-DT.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort IPK Parameter: Terminal Half-life (t1/2)13.21 hStandard Deviation 5.51
Cohort IIAPK Parameter: Terminal Half-life (t1/2)12.22 hStandard Deviation 2.63
Cohort IIBPK Parameter: Terminal Half-life (t1/2)9.10 hStandard Deviation 3.4
Cohort IIIPK Parameter: Terminal Half-life (t1/2)9.93 hStandard Deviation 2.58
Cohort IVPK Parameter: Terminal Half-life (t1/2)16.85 hStandard Deviation 8.22
Secondary

Summary of Changes in CD4 Count From Baseline

The median differences between CD4 count at Week 24 and 48 minus at the Day 0 (baseline), and Interquartile Ranges (IQRs) are presented.

Time frame: Measured at Day 0, Week 24, and Week 48

Population: Participants who received at least one dose of DTG. Study participants who had non-missing values were summarized.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Cohort ISummary of Changes in CD4 Count From BaselineFrom baseline to Week 2463 cells/mm^3
Cohort ISummary of Changes in CD4 Count From BaselineFrom baseline to Week 4884 cells/mm^3
Cohort IIASummary of Changes in CD4 Count From BaselineFrom baseline to Week 24209 cells/mm^3
Cohort IIASummary of Changes in CD4 Count From BaselineFrom baseline to Week 48387 cells/mm^3
Cohort IIBSummary of Changes in CD4 Count From BaselineFrom baseline to Week 24268 cells/mm^3
Cohort IIBSummary of Changes in CD4 Count From BaselineFrom baseline to Week 48246 cells/mm^3
Cohort IIISummary of Changes in CD4 Count From BaselineFrom baseline to Week 24199 cells/mm^3
Cohort IIISummary of Changes in CD4 Count From BaselineFrom baseline to Week 48134.5 cells/mm^3
Cohort IVSummary of Changes in CD4 Count From BaselineFrom baseline to Week 24472 cells/mm^3
Cohort IVSummary of Changes in CD4 Count From BaselineFrom baseline to Week 48577 cells/mm^3
Cohort III-DTSummary of Changes in CD4 Count From BaselineFrom baseline to Week 24249 cells/mm^3
Cohort III-DTSummary of Changes in CD4 Count From BaselineFrom baseline to Week 48191 cells/mm^3
Cohort IV-DTSummary of Changes in CD4 Count From BaselineFrom baseline to Week 48-1 cells/mm^3
Cohort IV-DTSummary of Changes in CD4 Count From BaselineFrom baseline to Week 24110 cells/mm^3
Cohort V-DTSummary of Changes in CD4 Count From BaselineFrom baseline to Week 24441 cells/mm^3
Cohort V-DTSummary of Changes in CD4 Count From BaselineFrom baseline to Week 48721 cells/mm^3
Secondary

Summary of Changes in CD4 Percent From Baseline

The median differences between CD4 percent at Week 24 and 48 minus at the Day 0 (baseline), and Interquartile Ranges (IQRs) are presented.

Time frame: Measured at Day 0, Week 24, and Week 48

Population: Participants who received at least one dose of DTG. Study participants who had non-missing values were summarized.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Cohort ISummary of Changes in CD4 Percent From BaselineFrom baseline to Week 244.9 Percentage of total lymphocytes
Cohort ISummary of Changes in CD4 Percent From BaselineFrom baseline to Week 484.7 Percentage of total lymphocytes
Cohort IIASummary of Changes in CD4 Percent From BaselineFrom baseline to Week 248 Percentage of total lymphocytes
Cohort IIASummary of Changes in CD4 Percent From BaselineFrom baseline to Week 489 Percentage of total lymphocytes
Cohort IIBSummary of Changes in CD4 Percent From BaselineFrom baseline to Week 246 Percentage of total lymphocytes
Cohort IIBSummary of Changes in CD4 Percent From BaselineFrom baseline to Week 489.2 Percentage of total lymphocytes
Cohort IIISummary of Changes in CD4 Percent From BaselineFrom baseline to Week 246 Percentage of total lymphocytes
Cohort IIISummary of Changes in CD4 Percent From BaselineFrom baseline to Week 485.6 Percentage of total lymphocytes
Cohort IVSummary of Changes in CD4 Percent From BaselineFrom baseline to Week 245.7 Percentage of total lymphocytes
Cohort IVSummary of Changes in CD4 Percent From BaselineFrom baseline to Week 489.9 Percentage of total lymphocytes
Cohort III-DTSummary of Changes in CD4 Percent From BaselineFrom baseline to Week 246.1 Percentage of total lymphocytes
Cohort III-DTSummary of Changes in CD4 Percent From BaselineFrom baseline to Week 489.1 Percentage of total lymphocytes
Cohort IV-DTSummary of Changes in CD4 Percent From BaselineFrom baseline to Week 488.8 Percentage of total lymphocytes
Cohort IV-DTSummary of Changes in CD4 Percent From BaselineFrom baseline to Week 246 Percentage of total lymphocytes
Cohort V-DTSummary of Changes in CD4 Percent From BaselineFrom baseline to Week 245.1 Percentage of total lymphocytes
Cohort V-DTSummary of Changes in CD4 Percent From BaselineFrom baseline to Week 489.7 Percentage of total lymphocytes
Secondary

Summary of Changes in CD8 Count From Baseline

The median differences between CD8 count at Week 24 and 48 minus at the Day 0 (baseline), and Interquartile Ranges (IQRs) are presented.

Time frame: Measured at Day 0, Week 24, and Week 48

Population: Participants who received at least one dose of DTG. Study participants who had non-missing values were summarized.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Cohort ISummary of Changes in CD8 Count From BaselineFrom baseline to Week 24-36 cells/mm^3
Cohort ISummary of Changes in CD8 Count From BaselineFrom baseline to Week 48-52.5 cells/mm^3
Cohort IIASummary of Changes in CD8 Count From BaselineFrom baseline to Week 24-147 cells/mm^3
Cohort IIASummary of Changes in CD8 Count From BaselineFrom baseline to Week 48-117 cells/mm^3
Cohort IIBSummary of Changes in CD8 Count From BaselineFrom baseline to Week 24-43 cells/mm^3
Cohort IIBSummary of Changes in CD8 Count From BaselineFrom baseline to Week 48-126 cells/mm^3
Cohort IIISummary of Changes in CD8 Count From BaselineFrom baseline to Week 24-282 cells/mm^3
Cohort IIISummary of Changes in CD8 Count From BaselineFrom baseline to Week 48-431.5 cells/mm^3
Cohort IVSummary of Changes in CD8 Count From BaselineFrom baseline to Week 24223 cells/mm^3
Cohort IVSummary of Changes in CD8 Count From BaselineFrom baseline to Week 48-376 cells/mm^3
Cohort III-DTSummary of Changes in CD8 Count From BaselineFrom baseline to Week 24-395 cells/mm^3
Cohort III-DTSummary of Changes in CD8 Count From BaselineFrom baseline to Week 48-464 cells/mm^3
Cohort IV-DTSummary of Changes in CD8 Count From BaselineFrom baseline to Week 48-1242 cells/mm^3
Cohort IV-DTSummary of Changes in CD8 Count From BaselineFrom baseline to Week 24-813 cells/mm^3
Cohort V-DTSummary of Changes in CD8 Count From BaselineFrom baseline to Week 24-210 cells/mm^3
Cohort V-DTSummary of Changes in CD8 Count From BaselineFrom baseline to Week 48-442 cells/mm^3
Secondary

Summary of Changes in CD8 Percent From Baseline

The median differences between CD8 percent at Week 24 and 48 minus at the Day 0 (baseline), and Interquartile Ranges (IQRs) are presented.

Time frame: Measured at Day 0, Week 24, and Week 48

Population: Participants who received at least one dose of DTG. Study participants who had non-missing values were summarized.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Cohort ISummary of Changes in CD8 Percent From BaselineFrom baseline to Week 24-5 Percentage of total lymphocytes
Cohort ISummary of Changes in CD8 Percent From BaselineFrom baseline to Week 48-6 Percentage of total lymphocytes
Cohort IIASummary of Changes in CD8 Percent From BaselineFrom baseline to Week 24-10 Percentage of total lymphocytes
Cohort IIASummary of Changes in CD8 Percent From BaselineFrom baseline to Week 48-11.4 Percentage of total lymphocytes
Cohort IIBSummary of Changes in CD8 Percent From BaselineFrom baseline to Week 24-7 Percentage of total lymphocytes
Cohort IIBSummary of Changes in CD8 Percent From BaselineFrom baseline to Week 48-8 Percentage of total lymphocytes
Cohort IIISummary of Changes in CD8 Percent From BaselineFrom baseline to Week 24-6.8 Percentage of total lymphocytes
Cohort IIISummary of Changes in CD8 Percent From BaselineFrom baseline to Week 48-6.5 Percentage of total lymphocytes
Cohort IVSummary of Changes in CD8 Percent From BaselineFrom baseline to Week 24-2 Percentage of total lymphocytes
Cohort IVSummary of Changes in CD8 Percent From BaselineFrom baseline to Week 48-1.8 Percentage of total lymphocytes
Cohort III-DTSummary of Changes in CD8 Percent From BaselineFrom baseline to Week 24-3 Percentage of total lymphocytes
Cohort III-DTSummary of Changes in CD8 Percent From BaselineFrom baseline to Week 48-6.5 Percentage of total lymphocytes
Cohort IV-DTSummary of Changes in CD8 Percent From BaselineFrom baseline to Week 48-9 Percentage of total lymphocytes
Cohort IV-DTSummary of Changes in CD8 Percent From BaselineFrom baseline to Week 24-4.2 Percentage of total lymphocytes
Cohort V-DTSummary of Changes in CD8 Percent From BaselineFrom baseline to Week 24-4 Percentage of total lymphocytes
Cohort V-DTSummary of Changes in CD8 Percent From BaselineFrom baseline to Week 48-3.5 Percentage of total lymphocytes
Secondary

Worst Case CDC HIV Classification Status

Disease progression as measured by change from baseline to the worst case CDC HIV classification status

Time frame: From baseline through Week 192

Population: All participants enrolled into the study

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cohort IWorst Case CDC HIV Classification StatusMildly symptomatic at entry0 Participants
Cohort IWorst Case CDC HIV Classification StatusStage I or II at entry0 Participants
Cohort IWorst Case CDC HIV Classification StatusModerately symptomatic at entry0 Participants
Cohort IWorst Case CDC HIV Classification StatusStage III at entry0 Participants
Cohort IWorst Case CDC HIV Classification StatusSeverely symptomatic at entry0 Participants
Cohort IWorst Case CDC HIV Classification StatusNot symptomatic at entry74 Participants
Cohort IIAWorst Case CDC HIV Classification StatusNot symptomatic at entry0 Participants
Cohort IIAWorst Case CDC HIV Classification StatusStage I or II at entry0 Participants
Cohort IIAWorst Case CDC HIV Classification StatusMildly symptomatic at entry37 Participants
Cohort IIAWorst Case CDC HIV Classification StatusModerately symptomatic at entry0 Participants
Cohort IIAWorst Case CDC HIV Classification StatusSeverely symptomatic at entry0 Participants
Cohort IIAWorst Case CDC HIV Classification StatusStage III at entry0 Participants
Cohort IIBWorst Case CDC HIV Classification StatusNot symptomatic at entry1 Participants
Cohort IIBWorst Case CDC HIV Classification StatusModerately symptomatic at entry20 Participants
Cohort IIBWorst Case CDC HIV Classification StatusSeverely symptomatic at entry0 Participants
Cohort IIBWorst Case CDC HIV Classification StatusStage I or II at entry0 Participants
Cohort IIBWorst Case CDC HIV Classification StatusStage III at entry0 Participants
Cohort IIBWorst Case CDC HIV Classification StatusMildly symptomatic at entry0 Participants
Cohort IIIWorst Case CDC HIV Classification StatusNot symptomatic at entry0 Participants
Cohort IIIWorst Case CDC HIV Classification StatusStage I or II at entry0 Participants
Cohort IIIWorst Case CDC HIV Classification StatusStage III at entry0 Participants
Cohort IIIWorst Case CDC HIV Classification StatusSeverely symptomatic at entry31 Participants
Cohort IIIWorst Case CDC HIV Classification StatusMildly symptomatic at entry0 Participants
Cohort IIIWorst Case CDC HIV Classification StatusModerately symptomatic at entry1 Participants
Cohort IVWorst Case CDC HIV Classification StatusModerately symptomatic at entry0 Participants
Cohort IVWorst Case CDC HIV Classification StatusStage I or II at entry0 Participants
Cohort IVWorst Case CDC HIV Classification StatusStage III at entry7 Participants
Cohort IVWorst Case CDC HIV Classification StatusMildly symptomatic at entry0 Participants
Cohort IVWorst Case CDC HIV Classification StatusSeverely symptomatic at entry0 Participants
Cohort IVWorst Case CDC HIV Classification StatusNot symptomatic at entry0 Participants
Cohort III-DTWorst Case CDC HIV Classification StatusStage I or II at entry10 Participants
Cohort III-DTWorst Case CDC HIV Classification StatusNot symptomatic at entry0 Participants
Cohort III-DTWorst Case CDC HIV Classification StatusMildly symptomatic at entry0 Participants
Cohort III-DTWorst Case CDC HIV Classification StatusModerately symptomatic at entry0 Participants
Cohort III-DTWorst Case CDC HIV Classification StatusSeverely symptomatic at entry0 Participants
Cohort III-DTWorst Case CDC HIV Classification StatusStage III at entry0 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Sep 14, 2026