Skip to content

A Clinical Study in Patients With Overactive Bladder With Leakage of Urine, to Find Out if the Medicine, Fesoterodine, Works in Those Patients Who Did Not Have Enough Response to the Medicine, Tolterodine.

A 14 Week Randomized Parallel Group Placebo-Controlled Double-Blind Multicentre Study Of Fesoterodine 8 Mg In Overactive Bladder Patients With Sub-Optimal Response To Tolterodine 4 Mg Extended Release (ER).

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01302054
Enrollment
990
Registered
2011-02-23
Start date
2011-05-31
Completion date
2012-05-31
Last updated
2018-12-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Urinary Bladder, Overactive

Keywords

Bladder Overactive, Overactive urinary bladder, Overactive Bladder

Brief summary

Patients with overactive bladder are often treated with tolterodine, a medication that helps relax the bladder, helping symptoms of urinary incontinence and urinary frequency. Sometimes patients do not have a satisfactory response, and may benefit from trying an alternative oral medicine. Fesoterodine is related to tolterodine by producing the same active substance that acts on the bladder, but potentially at higher and more effective levels. So, a patient who has a poor response to tolterodine may still obtain a good response to fesoterodine. This study will help find out if this is what happens.

Interventions

DRUGFesoterodine 8 mg

Fesoterodine sustained release tablets once every morning at 4 mg dose for first week, followed by 11 weeks at 8 mg strength.

DRUGPlacebo

Matching placebo for fesoterodine 4 and 8 mg for a total of 12 weeks.

Sponsors

Pfizer
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of overactive bladder with symptoms for at least 6 months. * Moderate to severe incontinence episode frequency and subsequent sub-optimal response to tolterodine * Women of child-bearing potential must not intend to become pregnant, be pregnant or producing breast milk at the time of study entry, and must use contraception

Exclusion criteria

* Conditions or prior treatment that may also affect bladder function * Clinically significant urinary tract infection (UTI) * Ongoing treatment with overactive bladder medications (these can be stopped at the first visit to allow entry into the study).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Number of Urgency Urinary Incontinence (UUI) Episodes Per 24 HoursBaseline, Week 12UUI episodes were defined as those with the urinary sensation scale (USS) rating of 5 in the diary. USS range from 1 to 5: 1. No feeling of urgency, 2. Mild feeling of urgency, 3. Moderate feeling of urgency, 4. Severe feeling of urgency, 5. Unable to hold; leak urine.
Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Urgency Urinary Incontinence (UUI) Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 12Baseline, Week 12UUI episodes were defined as those with the urinary sensation scale (USS) rating of 5 in the diary. USS range from 1 to 5: 1. No feeling of urgency, 2. Mild feeling of urgency, 3. Moderate feeling of urgency, 4. Severe feeling of urgency, 5. Unable to hold; leak urine.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 12Baseline, Week 12PPBC: single-item, self-administered validated questionnaire. Participant answered: Which of the following statements describes your bladder condition best at the moment? on a 6-point scale, 1=no problems at all; 2=some very minor problems; 3=some minor problems; 4=some moderate problems; 5=severe problems; 6=many severe problems. Change=observation minus baseline. Results categorized as Deterioration (Positive change from baseline); No Change (scores change=0); Minor Improvement (negative score change in magnitude of 1); Major Improvement (negative score change in magnitude of \>=2).
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Urgency Perception Scale (UPS) at Week 12Baseline, Week 12UPS: single-item, self-administered validated questionnaire. Participant answered: Which of the following would typically describe your experience when you have a desire to urinate? on a 3-point scale, 1=usually not able to hold urine; 2=usually able to hold urine (without leaking) until I reach a toilet if I go to the toilet immediately; 3= usually able to finish what I am doing before going to the toilet (without leaking). Change = observation minus baseline. Results categorized as Deterioration (Negative change); no change (Score change=0); improvement (Positive change).
Change From Baseline in Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) Symptom Bother Score at Week 12Baseline, Week 12OAB-q: a self-administered, 33-item, questionnaire that assesses how much the participant has been bothered by selected bladder symptoms. Each item rated by participant on Likert scale 1 (not at all) to 6 (a very great deal). Symptom bother score derived as sum of scores for questions 1-8; lowest possible raw score: 8; highest possible score: 48. Data analyzed based on transformation of the score to a 0 to 100 scale \[(Actual total raw score - lowest possible value of raw score)/range\]\*100. Higher scores values indicative of greater symptom bother. Change=observation minus baseline.
Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours at Week 12Baseline, Week 12Micturitions include episodes of voluntary micturition and episodes of Urgency Urinary Incontinence (UUI). UUI episodes were defined as those micturitions with USS rating of 5 in the diary in participants with UUI at baseline. USS rating 5: Unable to hold; leak urine.
Percentage of Participants With More Than (>) 50 Percent (%) Reduction in UUI Episodes at Week 12 as Compared to Week -2Week -2, Week 12UUI episodes were defined as those with the urinary sensation scale (USS) rating of 5 in the diary. USS range from 1 to 5: 1. No feeling of urgency, 2. Mild feeling of urgency, 3. Moderate feeling of urgency, 4. Severe feeling of urgency, 5. Unable to hold; leak urine.
Percentage of Participants With More Than (>) 50 Percent (%) Reduction in UUI Episodes at Week 12 as Compared to BaselineBaseline, Week 12UUI episodes were defined as those with the urinary sensation scale (USS) rating of 5 in the diary. USS range from 1 to 5: 1. No feeling of urgency, 2. Mild feeling of urgency, 3. Moderate feeling of urgency, 4. Severe feeling of urgency, 5. Unable to hold; leak urine.
Percentage of Participants With No UUI Episodes (Diary Dry Rate)Week 4, Week 12UUI episodes were defined as those with the urinary sensation scale (USS) rating of 5 in the diary. USS range from 1 to 5: 1. No feeling of urgency, 2. Mild feeling of urgency, 3. Moderate feeling of urgency, 4. Severe feeling of urgency, 5. Unable to hold; leak urine.
Change From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) Domains and Total HRQL Score of Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) at Week 12Baseline, Week 12OAB-q: self-administered, 33-item, questionnaire, assesses how much participant has been bothered by selected bladder symptoms. Each item rated on Likert scale 1 (not at all) to 6 (a very great deal). Questions 9 to 33 constitute HRQL, includes domains: concern, coping, sleep, and social function. HRQL domain and total raw score derived as sum of scores. Transformed score range 0 to 100 (Total HRQL or domain) = \[(Highest possible raw score-Actual total raw score)/Raw score range\]\*100. Higher transformed scores indicative of better HRQL.
Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Micturition-Related Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 12Baseline, Week 12The mean number of micturition-related urgency episodes per 24 hours was calculated as the total number of micturitions with USS rating of greater than or equal to 3 divided by the total number of days that diary data was collected at that visit. USS range from 1 to 5: 1. No feeling of urgency, 2. Mild feeling of urgency, 3. Moderate feeling of urgency, 4. Severe feeling of urgency, 5. Unable to hold; leak urine.

Countries

Bulgaria, Canada, Czechia, Egypt, Finland, Germany, Hungary, Mexico, Poland, Russia, South Africa, South Korea, Sweden, Ukraine, United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Entire Study Population
Tolterodine 4 milligram (mg) extended release capsule orally once daily for 2 weeks during open-label run-in phase. Participants who were non-responders in the open-label run-in phase (defined as participants who had \<= 50 percent change in UUI episodes), were randomized to either fesoterodine or placebo group, in double-blind treatment phase.
990
Total990

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Between Open-Label and Double BlindDid Not Enter Double-Blind Phase200
Double-Blind Treatment PhaseAdverse Event01010
Double-Blind Treatment PhaseDid Not Meet Entrance Criteria002
Double-Blind Treatment PhaseLack of Efficacy024
Double-Blind Treatment PhaseLost to Follow-up021
Double-Blind Treatment PhaseOther049
Double-Blind Treatment PhaseProtocol Violation036
Double-Blind Treatment PhaseWithdrawal by Subject0614
Tolterodine Open-Label Run-In PhaseAdverse Event1300
Tolterodine Open-Label Run-In PhaseDid Not Meet Entrance Criteria31400
Tolterodine Open-Label Run-In PhaseLack of Efficacy400
Tolterodine Open-Label Run-In PhaseLost to Follow-up1700
Tolterodine Open-Label Run-In PhaseOther700
Tolterodine Open-Label Run-In PhaseProtocol Violation800
Tolterodine Open-Label Run-In PhaseWithdrawal by Subject1600

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicEntire Study Population
Age, Continuous57.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.7
Sex: Female, Male
Female
810 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
180 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
90 / 99076 / 30848 / 301
serious
Total, serious adverse events
3 / 9905 / 3087 / 301

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Urgency Urinary Incontinence (UUI) Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 12

UUI episodes were defined as those with the urinary sensation scale (USS) rating of 5 in the diary. USS range from 1 to 5: 1. No feeling of urgency, 2. Mild feeling of urgency, 3. Moderate feeling of urgency, 4. Severe feeling of urgency, 5. Unable to hold; leak urine.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: Full Analysis set (FAS): all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of double-blind study treatment, had baseline/post-baseline efficacy assessment. Missing data were imputed by LOCF. N (number of participants analyzed): participants with baseline UUI episodes \>0 per 24 hours and non-missing change from baseline at Week 12 (LOCF).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Fesoterodine: Double-Blind BaselineChange From Baseline in Mean Number of Urgency Urinary Incontinence (UUI) Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 12Baseline3.93 episodes per 24 hoursStandard Deviation 2.53
Fesoterodine: Double-Blind BaselineChange From Baseline in Mean Number of Urgency Urinary Incontinence (UUI) Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 12Change at Week 12-2.32 episodes per 24 hoursStandard Deviation 2.67
Fesoterodine: Double-Blind Week 12Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Urgency Urinary Incontinence (UUI) Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 12Baseline3.83 episodes per 24 hoursStandard Deviation 2.52
Fesoterodine: Double-Blind Week 12Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Urgency Urinary Incontinence (UUI) Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 12Change at Week 12-1.76 episodes per 24 hoursStandard Deviation 2.46
Comparison: Multiple hypothesis testing was carried out in a hierarchical sequentially rejective manner. Statistical testing between fesoterodine and placebo (Analysis of covariance \[ANCOVA\]) was carried out only if the change from baseline at Week 12 in UUI episodes for fesoterodine group was found statistically significant (paired t-test).p-value: 0.007995% CI: [-0.87, -0.13]ANCOVA
Primary

Mean Number of Urgency Urinary Incontinence (UUI) Episodes Per 24 Hours

UUI episodes were defined as those with the urinary sensation scale (USS) rating of 5 in the diary. USS range from 1 to 5: 1. No feeling of urgency, 2. Mild feeling of urgency, 3. Moderate feeling of urgency, 4. Severe feeling of urgency, 5. Unable to hold; leak urine.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: Full analysis set:all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of double-blind study treatment, had baseline/post-baseline efficacy assessment. Last Observation Carried Forward(LOCF) was used. N(number of participants analyzed):participants with baseline UUI episodes \>0 per 24 hours and non-missing change from baseline at Week 12(LOCF).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Fesoterodine: Double-Blind BaselineMean Number of Urgency Urinary Incontinence (UUI) Episodes Per 24 Hours3.93 episodes per 24 hoursStandard Deviation 2.53
Fesoterodine: Double-Blind Week 12Mean Number of Urgency Urinary Incontinence (UUI) Episodes Per 24 Hours1.60 episodes per 24 hoursStandard Deviation 2.56
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-2.63, -2.02]t-test, 1 sided
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) Domains and Total HRQL Score of Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) at Week 12

OAB-q: self-administered, 33-item, questionnaire, assesses how much participant has been bothered by selected bladder symptoms. Each item rated on Likert scale 1 (not at all) to 6 (a very great deal). Questions 9 to 33 constitute HRQL, includes domains: concern, coping, sleep, and social function. HRQL domain and total raw score derived as sum of scores. Transformed score range 0 to 100 (Total HRQL or domain) = \[(Highest possible raw score-Actual total raw score)/Raw score range\]\*100. Higher transformed scores indicative of better HRQL.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: FAS: all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of double-blind study treatment, had baseline/post-baseline efficacy assessment. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed): participants with non-missing change from baseline value at Week 12.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Fesoterodine: Double-Blind BaselineChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) Domains and Total HRQL Score of Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) at Week 12Concern Subscale: Baseline43.63 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 26
Fesoterodine: Double-Blind BaselineChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) Domains and Total HRQL Score of Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) at Week 12Concern Subscale: Change at Week 1223.11 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.77
Fesoterodine: Double-Blind BaselineChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) Domains and Total HRQL Score of Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) at Week 12Coping Subscale: Baseline38.74 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.24
Fesoterodine: Double-Blind BaselineChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) Domains and Total HRQL Score of Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) at Week 12Coping Subscale: Change at Week 1223.70 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.69
Fesoterodine: Double-Blind BaselineChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) Domains and Total HRQL Score of Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) at Week 12Sleep Subscale: Baseline41.38 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.66
Fesoterodine: Double-Blind BaselineChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) Domains and Total HRQL Score of Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) at Week 12Sleep Subscale: Change at Week 1220.85 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.42
Fesoterodine: Double-Blind BaselineChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) Domains and Total HRQL Score of Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) at Week 12Social Interaction Subscale: Baseline65.03 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.34
Fesoterodine: Double-Blind BaselineChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) Domains and Total HRQL Score of Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) at Week 12Social Interaction Subscale: Change at Week 1214.47 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.26
Fesoterodine: Double-Blind BaselineChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) Domains and Total HRQL Score of Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) at Week 12Total HRQL Score: Baseline45.90 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.72
Fesoterodine: Double-Blind BaselineChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) Domains and Total HRQL Score of Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) at Week 12Total HRQL Score: Change at Week 1221.12 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.62
Fesoterodine: Double-Blind Week 12Change From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) Domains and Total HRQL Score of Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) at Week 12Social Interaction Subscale: Change at Week 128.85 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.12
Fesoterodine: Double-Blind Week 12Change From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) Domains and Total HRQL Score of Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) at Week 12Concern Subscale: Baseline44.25 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.58
Fesoterodine: Double-Blind Week 12Change From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) Domains and Total HRQL Score of Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) at Week 12Sleep Subscale: Change at Week 1214.79 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.74
Fesoterodine: Double-Blind Week 12Change From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) Domains and Total HRQL Score of Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) at Week 12Concern Subscale: Change at Week 1213.83 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.03
Fesoterodine: Double-Blind Week 12Change From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) Domains and Total HRQL Score of Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) at Week 12Total HRQL Score: Change at Week 1213.42 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.92
Fesoterodine: Double-Blind Week 12Change From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) Domains and Total HRQL Score of Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) at Week 12Coping Subscale: Baseline41.15 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.04
Fesoterodine: Double-Blind Week 12Change From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) Domains and Total HRQL Score of Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) at Week 12Social Interaction Subscale: Baseline68.40 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.29
Fesoterodine: Double-Blind Week 12Change From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) Domains and Total HRQL Score of Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) at Week 12Coping Subscale: Change at Week 1215.07 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.2
Fesoterodine: Double-Blind Week 12Change From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) Domains and Total HRQL Score of Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) at Week 12Total HRQL Score: Baseline47.38 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.7
Fesoterodine: Double-Blind Week 12Change From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) Domains and Total HRQL Score of Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) at Week 12Sleep Subscale: Baseline40.69 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.28
Comparison: Concern Subscale - Change at Week 12: ANCOVA model with terms for treatment and country with centered baseline value as a covariate was used.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [5.12, 12.91]ANCOVA
Comparison: Coping Subscale - Change at Week 12: ANCOVA model with terms for treatment and country with centered baseline value as a covariate was used.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [3.87, 11.62]ANCOVA
Comparison: Sleep Subscale - Change at Week 12: ANCOVA model with terms for treatment and country with centered baseline value as a covariate was used.p-value: 0.001295% CI: [2.6, 10.45]ANCOVA
Comparison: Social Interaction Subscale - Change at Week 12: ANCOVA model with terms for treatment and country with centered baseline value as a covariate was used.p-value: 0.012395% CI: [0.9, 7.36]ANCOVA
Comparison: Total HRQL - Change at Week 12: ANCOVA model with terms for treatment and country with centered baseline value as a covariate was used.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [3.63, 10.57]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Micturition-Related Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 12

The mean number of micturition-related urgency episodes per 24 hours was calculated as the total number of micturitions with USS rating of greater than or equal to 3 divided by the total number of days that diary data was collected at that visit. USS range from 1 to 5: 1. No feeling of urgency, 2. Mild feeling of urgency, 3. Moderate feeling of urgency, 4. Severe feeling of urgency, 5. Unable to hold; leak urine.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: FAS: all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of double-blind study treatment, had baseline/post-baseline efficacy assessment. Missing data were imputed by LOCF. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed): participants with baseline urgency episodes \>0 per 24 hours and non-missing change from baseline at Week 12 (LOCF).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Fesoterodine: Double-Blind BaselineChange From Baseline in Mean Number of Micturition-Related Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 12Baseline11.38 episodes per 24 hoursStandard Deviation 3.98
Fesoterodine: Double-Blind BaselineChange From Baseline in Mean Number of Micturition-Related Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 12Change at Week 12-3.33 episodes per 24 hoursStandard Deviation 4.47
Fesoterodine: Double-Blind Week 12Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Micturition-Related Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 12Baseline11.26 episodes per 24 hoursStandard Deviation 4.01
Fesoterodine: Double-Blind Week 12Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Micturition-Related Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 12Change at Week 12-2.52 episodes per 24 hoursStandard Deviation 4.45
Comparison: Change at Week 12: ANCOVA model with terms for treatment and country with centered baseline value as a covariate was used.p-value: 0.043895% CI: [-1.37, -0.02]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours at Week 12

Micturitions include episodes of voluntary micturition and episodes of Urgency Urinary Incontinence (UUI). UUI episodes were defined as those micturitions with USS rating of 5 in the diary in participants with UUI at baseline. USS rating 5: Unable to hold; leak urine.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: FAS: all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of double-blind study treatment, had baseline/post-baseline efficacy assessment. Missing data were imputed by LOCF. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed): participants with baseline micturitions \>0 per 24 hours and non-missing change from baseline at Week 12 (LOCF).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Fesoterodine: Double-Blind BaselineChange From Baseline in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours at Week 12Baseline12.44 micturitions per 24 hoursStandard Deviation 3.57
Fesoterodine: Double-Blind BaselineChange From Baseline in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours at Week 12Change at Week 12-1.94 micturitions per 24 hoursStandard Deviation 3.15
Fesoterodine: Double-Blind Week 12Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours at Week 12Baseline12.48 micturitions per 24 hoursStandard Deviation 3.75
Fesoterodine: Double-Blind Week 12Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours at Week 12Change at Week 12-1.57 micturitions per 24 hoursStandard Deviation 3.13
Comparison: Change at Week 12: ANCOVA model with terms for treatment and country with centered baseline value as a covariate was used.p-value: 0.093195% CI: [-0.86, 0.07]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) Symptom Bother Score at Week 12

OAB-q: a self-administered, 33-item, questionnaire that assesses how much the participant has been bothered by selected bladder symptoms. Each item rated by participant on Likert scale 1 (not at all) to 6 (a very great deal). Symptom bother score derived as sum of scores for questions 1-8; lowest possible raw score: 8; highest possible score: 48. Data analyzed based on transformation of the score to a 0 to 100 scale \[(Actual total raw score - lowest possible value of raw score)/range\]\*100. Higher scores values indicative of greater symptom bother. Change=observation minus baseline.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: FAS: all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of double-blind study treatment, had baseline/post-baseline efficacy assessment. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed): participants with non-missing change from baseline value at Week 12.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Fesoterodine: Double-Blind BaselineChange From Baseline in Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) Symptom Bother Score at Week 12Baseline66.67 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.28
Fesoterodine: Double-Blind BaselineChange From Baseline in Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) Symptom Bother Score at Week 12Change at Week 12-24.61 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.57
Fesoterodine: Double-Blind Week 12Change From Baseline in Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) Symptom Bother Score at Week 12Baseline64.74 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.69
Fesoterodine: Double-Blind Week 12Change From Baseline in Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) Symptom Bother Score at Week 12Change at Week 12-15.99 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.53
Comparison: Change at Week 12: ANCOVA model with terms for treatment and country with centered baseline value as a covariate was used.p-value: 0.000195% CI: [-11.1, -3.58]ANCOVA
Secondary

Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 12

PPBC: single-item, self-administered validated questionnaire. Participant answered: Which of the following statements describes your bladder condition best at the moment? on a 6-point scale, 1=no problems at all; 2=some very minor problems; 3=some minor problems; 4=some moderate problems; 5=severe problems; 6=many severe problems. Change=observation minus baseline. Results categorized as Deterioration (Positive change from baseline); No Change (scores change=0); Minor Improvement (negative score change in magnitude of 1); Major Improvement (negative score change in magnitude of \>=2).

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: FAS: all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of double-blind study treatment, had baseline/post-baseline efficacy assessment. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed): participants with non-missing change from baseline value at Week 12.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Fesoterodine: Double-Blind BaselineNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 12Baseline: Some Very Minor Problems4 participants
Fesoterodine: Double-Blind BaselineNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 12Baseline: No Problems at all0 participants
Fesoterodine: Double-Blind BaselineNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 12Baseline: Some Minor Problems15 participants
Fesoterodine: Double-Blind BaselineNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 12Baseline: Some Moderate Problems60 participants
Fesoterodine: Double-Blind BaselineNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 12Baseline: Severe Problems147 participants
Fesoterodine: Double-Blind BaselineNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 12Baseline: Many Severe Problems65 participants
Fesoterodine: Double-Blind BaselineNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 12Change at Week 12: Deterioration17 participants
Fesoterodine: Double-Blind BaselineNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 12Change at Week 12: No Change80 participants
Fesoterodine: Double-Blind BaselineNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 12Change at Week 12: Minor Improvement84 participants
Fesoterodine: Double-Blind BaselineNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 12Change at Week 12: Major Improvement110 participants
Fesoterodine: Double-Blind Week 12Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 12Change at Week 12: No Change95 participants
Fesoterodine: Double-Blind Week 12Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 12Baseline: Some Very Minor Problems6 participants
Fesoterodine: Double-Blind Week 12Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 12Baseline: Many Severe Problems36 participants
Fesoterodine: Double-Blind Week 12Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 12Baseline: No Problems at all0 participants
Fesoterodine: Double-Blind Week 12Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 12Change at Week 12: Major Improvement57 participants
Fesoterodine: Double-Blind Week 12Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 12Baseline: Some Minor Problems9 participants
Fesoterodine: Double-Blind Week 12Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 12Change at Week 12: Deterioration32 participants
Fesoterodine: Double-Blind Week 12Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 12Baseline: Some Moderate Problems75 participants
Fesoterodine: Double-Blind Week 12Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 12Change at Week 12: Minor Improvement83 participants
Fesoterodine: Double-Blind Week 12Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 12Baseline: Severe Problems141 participants
p-value: <0.0001Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Urgency Perception Scale (UPS) at Week 12

UPS: single-item, self-administered validated questionnaire. Participant answered: Which of the following would typically describe your experience when you have a desire to urinate? on a 3-point scale, 1=usually not able to hold urine; 2=usually able to hold urine (without leaking) until I reach a toilet if I go to the toilet immediately; 3= usually able to finish what I am doing before going to the toilet (without leaking). Change = observation minus baseline. Results categorized as Deterioration (Negative change); no change (Score change=0); improvement (Positive change).

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: FAS: all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of double-blind study treatment, had baseline/post-baseline efficacy assessment. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed): participants with non-missing change from baseline value at Week 12.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Fesoterodine: Double-Blind BaselineNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Urgency Perception Scale (UPS) at Week 12Baseline: Not able to hold urine126 participants
Fesoterodine: Double-Blind BaselineNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Urgency Perception Scale (UPS) at Week 12Baseline:Able to hold urine until I reach a toilet158 participants
Fesoterodine: Double-Blind BaselineNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Urgency Perception Scale (UPS) at Week 12Baseline:Able to finish what I am doing7 participants
Fesoterodine: Double-Blind BaselineNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Urgency Perception Scale (UPS) at Week 12Change at Week 12: Deterioration17 participants
Fesoterodine: Double-Blind BaselineNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Urgency Perception Scale (UPS) at Week 12Change at Week 12: No Change167 participants
Fesoterodine: Double-Blind BaselineNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Urgency Perception Scale (UPS) at Week 12Change at Week 12: Improvement107 participants
Fesoterodine: Double-Blind Week 12Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Urgency Perception Scale (UPS) at Week 12Change at Week 12: No Change158 participants
Fesoterodine: Double-Blind Week 12Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Urgency Perception Scale (UPS) at Week 12Baseline: Not able to hold urine99 participants
Fesoterodine: Double-Blind Week 12Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Urgency Perception Scale (UPS) at Week 12Change at Week 12: Deterioration31 participants
Fesoterodine: Double-Blind Week 12Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Urgency Perception Scale (UPS) at Week 12Baseline:Able to hold urine until I reach a toilet157 participants
Fesoterodine: Double-Blind Week 12Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Urgency Perception Scale (UPS) at Week 12Change at Week 12: Improvement78 participants
Fesoterodine: Double-Blind Week 12Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Urgency Perception Scale (UPS) at Week 12Baseline:Able to finish what I am doing11 participants
p-value: 0.0095Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With More Than (>) 50 Percent (%) Reduction in UUI Episodes at Week 12 as Compared to Baseline

UUI episodes were defined as those with the urinary sensation scale (USS) rating of 5 in the diary. USS range from 1 to 5: 1. No feeling of urgency, 2. Mild feeling of urgency, 3. Moderate feeling of urgency, 4. Severe feeling of urgency, 5. Unable to hold; leak urine.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: FAS: all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of double-blind study treatment, had baseline/post-baseline efficacy assessment. Missing data were imputed by LOCF. N (number of participants analyzed): participants with baseline UUI episodes \>0 per 24 hours and non-missing change from baseline at Week 12 (LOCF).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Fesoterodine: Double-Blind BaselinePercentage of Participants With More Than (>) 50 Percent (%) Reduction in UUI Episodes at Week 12 as Compared to Baseline69.9 percentage of participants
Fesoterodine: Double-Blind Week 12Percentage of Participants With More Than (>) 50 Percent (%) Reduction in UUI Episodes at Week 12 as Compared to Baseline57.0 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.0027Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With More Than (>) 50 Percent (%) Reduction in UUI Episodes at Week 12 as Compared to Week -2

UUI episodes were defined as those with the urinary sensation scale (USS) rating of 5 in the diary. USS range from 1 to 5: 1. No feeling of urgency, 2. Mild feeling of urgency, 3. Moderate feeling of urgency, 4. Severe feeling of urgency, 5. Unable to hold; leak urine.

Time frame: Week -2, Week 12

Population: FAS: all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of double-blind study treatment, had baseline/post-baseline efficacy assessment. Missing data were imputed by LOCF. N (number of participants analyzed): participants with Week -2 UUI episodes \>0 per 24 hours and non-missing change from baseline at Week 12 (LOCF).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Fesoterodine: Double-Blind BaselinePercentage of Participants With More Than (>) 50 Percent (%) Reduction in UUI Episodes at Week 12 as Compared to Week -272.8 percentage of participants
Fesoterodine: Double-Blind Week 12Percentage of Participants With More Than (>) 50 Percent (%) Reduction in UUI Episodes at Week 12 as Compared to Week -259.6 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.0023Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With No UUI Episodes (Diary Dry Rate)

UUI episodes were defined as those with the urinary sensation scale (USS) rating of 5 in the diary. USS range from 1 to 5: 1. No feeling of urgency, 2. Mild feeling of urgency, 3. Moderate feeling of urgency, 4. Severe feeling of urgency, 5. Unable to hold; leak urine.

Time frame: Week 4, Week 12

Population: FAS: all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of double-blind study treatment, had baseline/post-baseline efficacy assessment. Missing data were imputed by LOCF. N (number of participants analyzed): participants with baseline UUI episodes \>0 per 24 hours and non-missing change from baseline at Week 4 and 12 (LOCF).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Fesoterodine: Double-Blind BaselinePercentage of Participants With No UUI Episodes (Diary Dry Rate)Week 425.4 percentage of participants
Fesoterodine: Double-Blind BaselinePercentage of Participants With No UUI Episodes (Diary Dry Rate)Week 1239.0 percentage of participants
Fesoterodine: Double-Blind Week 12Percentage of Participants With No UUI Episodes (Diary Dry Rate)Week 417.7 percentage of participants
Fesoterodine: Double-Blind Week 12Percentage of Participants With No UUI Episodes (Diary Dry Rate)Week 1232.3 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.0427Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: 0.1461Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 14, 2026