Skip to content

TissueLink Study During Multi-Level Spine Surgery

Efficacy of the TissueLink Coagulation System in Reducing Hemoglobin Loss During Multi-Level Spine Surgery

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01300559
Enrollment
60
Registered
2011-02-21
Start date
2006-04-30
Completion date
2012-08-31
Last updated
2013-02-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Low Back Pain

Keywords

efficacy, hemoglobin, spine

Brief summary

The overall objective of the investigators research is to test the clinical efficacy of the TissueLink™ (Salient Surgical Technologies, Inc.) coagulation system in minimizing hemoglobin loss intraoperatively. This is a prospective, randomized investigation that will be performed at Duke University Medical Center (DUMC). The overall goal of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of Tissue Link HemoSealing system in minimizing hemoglobin loss preoperatively, intraoperatively and postoperatively for patients undergoing multilevel elective spinal surgery. Not greater than eighty patients scheduled for elective, multi-level decompression and fusion spinal surgery with Dr. William Richardson will be randomized into two groups. Unipolar electrocautery will be used for intraoperative coagulation in one group and the Tissuelink device plus Unipolar electrocautery in the other. These are frequently performed cases with significant blood loss but otherwise low morbidity/mortality that would benefit from more effective intraoperative coagulation.

Detailed description

Very little research exists in the use of TissueLink HemoSealing device in spinal surgery. One retrospective study by Snyder et al evaluated hemostatic efficacy of this technology in children undergoing surgery for spinal fusion and instrumentation. Although the study reported no statistically significant difference in transfusion rates, there was a reduction in amount of blood transfused and operative time which was attributed to hemostatic efficacy in comparison with conventional wound management during surgery. The surgeons also reported a clearer operative field, improving visualization during surgery. Finally, the reduction in operative time which they suggested might be due to the use of this new device may reduce other complications by diminishing overall anesthesia exposure and blood product transfusions. From this initial retrospective study, the authors concluded that the use of the TissueLink HemoSealing device in spine surgery may be an effective tool in control of intra- and post-operative blood loss and may significantly reduce blood related and operative complications. More rigorous research needs to be done to evaluate the efficacy of the TissueLink HemoSealing device in hemostasis in the area of spine surgery.

Interventions

DEVICETissuelink device

Tissuelink device plus Unipolar electrocautery

Sponsors

Salient Surgical Technologies
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Duke University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age: 18 years and older * Sex: Both males and females will be included * Patient has a Body Mass Index (BMI) \<40 * Patient is willing and able to cooperate * Patient is in stable health and cleared for surgery * Patient is a candidate for elective multilevel posterior lumbar compression and fusion spinal surgery at least two or greater lumbar level involvement * Patient has completed the Informed Consent Form

Exclusion criteria

* Patient is unable or unwilling to comply with the entire study protocol * Patient has a previously diagnosed coagulopathy * Patient has preoperative hemoglobin \<11 g/dL * Patient has a Prothrombin Time and International Normalized Ratio (PT/INR) \>1.3 * Patient has a Partial Thromboplastin Time (PTT) \>40 * Patient has a platelet count \<100k * Patients will also be excluded if taking non-aspirin medications producing a bleeding diathesis undetectable by screening labs such as clopidogrel or ticlopidine within seven days of surgery or valproic acid (associated with thrombocytopenia) * Trauma patients are excluded * Patient is a poor compliance risk, i.e., history of ethanol, drug abuse * Severe cardiac disorder requiring special fluid management protocols * Patients with acute myocardial infarction and/or acute angina * Patient is on Plavix or other long term anti-coagulation including aspirin (ASA) or other nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) may be included provided their medications are discontinued a minimum of 7 days prior to surgery

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Hemoglobin Measurement g/dlAt the end of surgeryThe primary hypothesis was that use of the Aquamantys coagulation system in addition to unipolar cautery results in less intraoperative Hb loss compared with unipolar cautery alone during multilevel spinal decompression and fusion surgery.Intraoperatively, shed blood will be collected into a Cell-saver device. Surgical sponges will be recovered in a container of citrated normal saline. Prior to processing the salvaged blood from the cell-saver device, hemoglobin concentration (g/dL) and volume (dL) of the salvaged blood will be measured, allowing calculation of hemoglobin loss in grams.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

60 adult patients (age ≥ 18 years) undergoing elective, multilevel, posterior lumbar decompression and fusion with Dr William Richardson were randomly assigned into two groups.

Pre-assignment details

Enrollment started 10/09/2006 and enrollment completed 09/13/2010 with a total of 60 eligible subjects.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Treatment Group
Tissuelink device plus Unipolar electrocautery will be used in this arm of the study.
30
No Treatment
Unipolar electrocautery without Tissuelink device will be used in this arm of the study.
30
Total60

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicNo TreatmentTreatment GroupTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
12 Participants13 Participants25 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
18 Participants17 Participants35 Participants
Age Continuous61.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10
62.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.3
62.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.7
Region of Enrollment
United States
30 participants30 participants60 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
19 Participants22 Participants41 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
11 Participants8 Participants19 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 300 / 30
serious
Total, serious adverse events
3 / 303 / 30

Outcome results

Primary

Hemoglobin Measurement g/dl

The primary hypothesis was that use of the Aquamantys coagulation system in addition to unipolar cautery results in less intraoperative Hb loss compared with unipolar cautery alone during multilevel spinal decompression and fusion surgery.Intraoperatively, shed blood will be collected into a Cell-saver device. Surgical sponges will be recovered in a container of citrated normal saline. Prior to processing the salvaged blood from the cell-saver device, hemoglobin concentration (g/dL) and volume (dL) of the salvaged blood will be measured, allowing calculation of hemoglobin loss in grams.

Time frame: At the end of surgery

Population: Based on pilot data, it was estimated that 29 patients per group would provide 90% power with = 0.01 to distinguish such a difference between groups. Therefore, the randomized study was planned for 60 patients.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Treatment GroupHemoglobin Measurement g/dl66.2 hemoglobin g/dl
No Treatment GroupHemoglobin Measurement g/dl102.4 hemoglobin g/dl

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026