Skip to content

Ultrasound Scores as Indication of Response to Subcutaneous Abatacept in Subjects With Rheumatoid Arthritis

Musculoskeletal Ultrasound as a Marker of Therapeutic Response to Abatacept in Rheumatoid Arthritis

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01299961
Enrollment
25
Registered
2011-02-21
Start date
2011-03-31
Completion date
2015-02-28
Last updated
2015-06-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Rheumatoid Arthritis

Keywords

Rheumatoid Arthritis, Subcutaneous Abatacept, Ultrasound

Brief summary

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic inflammatory disease (a long-lasting disease causing pain and swelling) associated with significant health problems. It is a difficult disease to manage as the disease is often unpredictable. RA causes inflammation (swelling) of the joints that can cause joint damage, deformity, and progressive disability and impairment. It is estimated that 1% of the world's population suffers from this disease. The purpose of this research study is to determine if a change in inflammation seen on the ultrasound is a good indicator of how subjects' rheumatoid arthritis is responding to treatment of subcutaneous abatacept at 3 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months.

Interventions

DRUGabatacept

125 mg once a week up to 12 months.

Sponsors

University of California, Los Angeles
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Over 18 years old 2. Has a diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis 3. Stable DMARDs for at least 1 month (methotrexate, leflunomide, hydroxychloroquine, or sulfasalazine) 4. Disease activity score DAS28/ESR \> 3.2 or all must be met: TJC (tender joint count)\>=4, SJC (swollen joint count)\>=4 5. Must be able to understand information in the Informed Consent and comply with study requirements 6. Total ultrasound synovitis (inflammation of joint-lining membrane) power Doppler score \>=1 for at least 2 joints and total synovitis score \>=1 for at least 1 joint

Exclusion criteria

1. Current or prior use of biologic drugs (TNF inhibitors, IL-6 inhibitors, CD20 inhibitors, IL-1 inhibitors, etc.) 2. Pregnancy or breast feeding 3. Daily prednisone \> 10mg (stable dose for at least 1 month) 4. Intra-articular steroid injection of the wrist or joints within last 2 months 5. History of a concomitant autoimmune disease such as lupus, psoriatic arthritis 6. History of cancer 7. Previous exposure to abatacept

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
12 Month Change in 7-Joint Ultrasound (US) Inflammatory Scorebaseline, 12 monthsThe 7-joint US inflammatory score includes the addition of synovial hypertrophy scores and power doppler scores.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
12 Month Change in Power Doppler Ultrasound (PDUS) Scoresbaseline, 12 monthsThere were seven different joints in the hands and wrists evaluated to score the PDUS.
12 Month Change in Gray-scale Ultrasound (GSUS)baseline, 12 monthsThere were seven different joints in the hands and wrists evaluated to score the GSUS.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

A total of 34 RA patients were recruited from the UCLA rheumatology clinics between September 2011 to February 2013. However, we had a total of 9 screen fails.

Pre-assignment details

Patients enrolled in the study were required to have RA, on stable RA medications, and naive to abatacept.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Subcutaneous Abatacept
All subjects will receive an injection of 125 mg of abatacept once a week up to 12 months.
25
Total25

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyAdverse Event3
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy2
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSubcutaneous Abatacept
Age, Continuous52.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.4
Region of Enrollment
United States
25 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
23 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
2 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 25
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 25

Outcome results

Primary

12 Month Change in 7-Joint Ultrasound (US) Inflammatory Score

The 7-joint US inflammatory score includes the addition of synovial hypertrophy scores and power doppler scores.

Time frame: baseline, 12 months

Population: Total of 19 patients completed 12 mos

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Subcutaneous Abatacept12 Month Change in 7-Joint Ultrasound (US) Inflammatory Score11.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.1
Comparison: Most involved side: Synovitis (S), tenosynovitis (T), and power Doppler (PD) of wrist (dorsal (D), palmar (P), and ulnar (U)); S and T of MCP 2,3 (P, plus D for T); PD of the MCP joints (P and D); S and PD of PIP 2, 3 (P, plus D for PD); S and PD for MTP 2, 4 (D). S and PD graded from 0 to 3, and max individual scores are 27 and 39, respectively. T graded on 0-1 scale; max T score is 5. High score is worse. The 7-joint US score is sum of T, S, and PD scores. Change calculated baseline- month 12.p-value: <0.01t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

12 Month Change in Gray-scale Ultrasound (GSUS)

There were seven different joints in the hands and wrists evaluated to score the GSUS.

Time frame: baseline, 12 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Subcutaneous Abatacept12 Month Change in Gray-scale Ultrasound (GSUS)1.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.7
Comparison: 7 joints were scanned by grey-scale ultra sound of the most affected side: wrist, MCP 2/3, PIP 2/3, and MTP 2/5. GSUS was scored semi-quantitatively on a scale of 0-3 (higher score is worse). The mean score of the 2-3 views obtained for each joint was added across all 7 joints, and the total GSUS (range 0-21) scores were calculated. The change from baseline to 12 months is calculated as the baseline GSUS minus 12 month GSUS.p-value: 0.19t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

12 Month Change in Power Doppler Ultrasound (PDUS) Scores

There were seven different joints in the hands and wrists evaluated to score the PDUS.

Time frame: baseline, 12 months

Population: As stated previously

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Subcutaneous Abatacept12 Month Change in Power Doppler Ultrasound (PDUS) Scores3.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.7
Comparison: 7 joints were scanned by power doppler ultra sound of the most affected side: wrist, MCP 2/3, PIP 2/3, and MTP 2/5. PDUS was scored semi-quantitatively on a scale of 0-3 (higher score is worse). The mean score of the 2-3 views obtained for each joint was added across all 7 joints, and the total PDUS (range 0-21) scores were calculated. The change from baseline to 12 months is calculated as the baseline PDUS minus 12 month PDUS.p-value: <0.01t-test, 2 sided

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026