Skip to content

Population Versus Practice-based Interventions to Increase Immunizations

Population Versus Practice-based Interventions to Increase Immunizations

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01296906
Enrollment
31567
Registered
2011-02-16
Start date
2010-05-31
Completion date
2012-09-30
Last updated
2013-06-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Comparative Effectiveness, Health Services Research, Immunization

Keywords

Reminder/recall messages, reminders, recall, immunizations, immunization information systems, effectiveness of reminder/recall, population-based reminder/recall

Brief summary

One of the nation's major health priorities, as outlined in Healthy People 2010, is to increase the proportion of children aged 19 to 35 months who have received all universally recommended vaccines. This study will compare two interventions for increasing immunization rates in this age group, one using well-studied primary care practice-based methods and the other using innovative technologies to increase immunization rates at the population-level. Results of this study will provide data that will be relevant nationally in guiding future investment of resources to increase up-to-date rates in young children prior to school entry. Hypothesis: Population-based approaches will be more effective than practice-based interventions at increasing immunizations among 19-35 month olds.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALRecall conducted by private practices

All practices in these counties will receive training on practice-based R/R using the Colorado Immunization Information System (CIIS or immunization registry). Practices will receive a recommended schedule for conducting recall in 19-35 month children and educational materials to use within their practices to promote compliance with the infant vaccination schedule. Individual practices will make their own decisions about the extent to which they follow the recommendations and implement recall within their practice. Although the study team will not provide them with any additional interventions, we will track any other interventions they independently do (websites, newsletters, telephone informational systems) in order to assess the effect of these additional interventions.

BEHAVIORALRecall conducted centrally by local health department

A centralized recall of children 19-35 months will be conducted through local health departments. CIIS will identify a cohort of 19-35 month olds with an who are in need of an immunization and will coordinate up to 3 mailers to children who are not current for recommended immunizations.

Sponsors

National Library of Medicine (NLM)
CollaboratorNIH
University of Colorado, Denver
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
19 Months to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* child between the age of 19-35 months * has an address in a specified study county in the state immunization registry * child is in need of at least one recommended immunization

Exclusion criteria

* child has opted out of the state immunization registry * child is up-to-date on all recommended immunizations

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Evaluate effectiveness of population-based reminder/recall methods versus practice-based reminder/recall methods in 14 Colorado counties (rural and urban)6 months post-intervention (December 2010)The primary outcome measures will be: 1) change in up-to-date rates from baseline levels 6 months after the intervention (T-1) for 19-35 month olds in population-based compared to practice-based intervention counties and 2) percent of children who were not up-to-date prior to recall (T-0) who received any additional new vaccine in each type of intervention county.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026