Skip to content

PETHEMA-LMA10: Treatment of Acute Myeloblastic Leukemia (AML) in Patients Less Than or Equal to 65 Years

PROTOCOL FOR First Line TREATMENT ADAPTED TO RISK of Acute Myeloblastic Leukemia in Patients LESS THAN OR EQUAL TO 65 YEARS

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01296178
Enrollment
200
Registered
2011-02-15
Start date
2010-12-31
Completion date
2021-12-31
Last updated
2021-03-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Myeloblastic Leukemia

Brief summary

Advances in the biological characterization of AML can now make a proper estimate of the risk of recurrence and likelihood of survival of different groups of patients according to the expression of different disease parameters. Karyotype, the molecular alterations affecting genes FLT3, NPM1 and CEBPA, minimal residual disease by flow cytometry and response to first induction cycle are variables that must be taken into consideration when planning the treatment of first line from a patient with AML. This breakthrough in the field of biology has not resulted yet in the development of new drugs really effective in the treatment of AML. Therefore, the core of the treatment continue to rely on the use of traditional chemotherapy combined or not with allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell. Both treatments differ in their antileukemic efficacy, higher in aloTPH, as well as their toxicity and procedure-related mortality, increased also in the aloTPH. These aspects should be added that most candidates aloTPH patients lack an HLA identical sibling donor forcing the search for alternative sources and hematopoietic stem cell donors. These transplants alternative, but are not committed to their antileukemic efficacy, it does have implied a greater toxicity. Therefore, the ultimate effectiveness of these procedures depends largely on the proper selection of candidates for the same. While there is broad agreement in terms of induction chemotherapy using a combination of cytarabine with anthracycline, the choice of chemotherapy regimen is controversial postremisión today. In the poor prognosis of itself involve the LMA, patients classified as favorable group are acceptable disease-free survival with consolidation schemes involving high-dose cytarabine. For other patients appear to be inappropriate to combine cytarabine with an anthracycline, at least one cycle of consolidation, and raise the option of allogeneic different depending on prognostic markers

Detailed description

Primary objectives 1. Optimizing current treatment of AML based on the classification of patients into different risk groups according to parameters cytogenetic and molecular response to treatment and to analyze its effectiveness in terms of survival. 2. Apply a uniform treatment to individual patients according to previously defined prognostic groups. Secondary Objectives 1. Correlate the different clinical and biological characteristics with response rates and patient outcomes. 2. Studying the role of minimal residual disease by molecular techniques in anticipation of relapse of AML

Interventions

DRUGIDARUBICINE

Administration of chemotherapy induction Idarubicin IV Dose of 12 mg/m2/day days 1 to 3

DRUGARA-C

ARA-C 200 mg/m2/day dose continuous infusion of IV days 1 to 7

Sponsors

PETHEMA Foundation
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
No minimum to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of AML according to WHO criteria * Previously untreated AML, including AML de novo,AML secondary to MDS or previous chemotherapy or radiotherapy * No promyelocytic leukemia (no t (15, 17) or PML-RARa rearrangement and its variants) * Age ≤ 65 years * ECOG performance status 0-2 * Provide written informed consent * Being able to comply with protocol procedures * Not to be fertile or willing to use a method of birth control during treatment and until the end of it * Adequate renal and hepatic function as follows, provided the changes, which would be not due to the disease: Total bilirubin \< 1.5 x upper limit of normal (ULN) institutional and AST and ALT \< 2.5 x ULN, and Serum creatinine \< 2.5 mg / dL. * Adequate cardiac function determined by at least 1 of the following: Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) \> 40% measured by echocardiography in multiport scanner acquisition (MUGA) or isotope angiography, or Left ventricular fractional shortening \> 22% measured in echocardiography

Exclusion criteria

* LPA diagnosis according to WHO criteria * Previously untreated AML, except for the administration of hydroxyurea as a cytoreductive agent which itself is permitted * AML secondary to chronic myeloproliferative syndrome * Age\> 65 years * ECOG performance status\> 2 * Absence of written informed consent * Being unable to comply with protocol procedures * Be fertile and not willing to use a method of birth control during treatment and until the end of it * Hypersensitivity to any drug protocol * Positive for HIV * Abnormal liver and renal functions as indicated below, provided the changes, which would be not due to the disease: Total bilirubin\> 1.5 x upper limit of normal (ULN) institutional and AST and ALT\> 2.5 x ULN, and serum creatinine\> 2.5 mg / dL * Altered cardiac function determined by at least 1 of the following: Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) \<40% measured by echocardiography in multiport scanner acquisition (MUGA) or isotope angiography, or Left ventricular fractional shortening \<22% measured by echocardiography

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of survival months in treated AML patients less or equal to 65 years as a measure of survival time2 yearsOptimizing current treatment of AML based on the classification of patients into different risk groups according to parameters cytogenetic and molecular response to treatment and to analyze its effectiveness in terms of survival
Patients classification in prognostic groups2 yearsPatients classification in prognostic groups and aplication of individual treatments.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Response rates2 yearsCorrelate the different clinical and biological characteristics with response rates and patient outcomes
Determinate the minimal residual disease2 yearsStudying the role of minimal residual disease by molecular techniques in anticipation of relapse of AML

Countries

Spain

Contacts

Primary ContactFederico Moscardó, Dr
fedemoscardo@yahoo.es+34 963862745

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026