Skip to content

Safety and Efficacy Study of New Eye Drop Formulations With Refresh Tears® in Patients With Dry Eye Disease

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01294384
Enrollment
305
Registered
2011-02-11
Start date
2011-05-01
Completion date
2012-09-25
Last updated
2019-04-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dry Eye Syndromes

Brief summary

This study will investigate the safety, efficacy and acceptability of two new eye drop formulations compared with Refresh Tears® in patients with dry eye disease.

Interventions

DRUGcarboxymethylcellulose sodium based New Eye Drop Formulation 1

1 to 2 drops of carboxymethylcellulose sodium based New Eye Drop Formulation 1 in each eye at least twice daily for 90 days.

DRUGcarboxymethylcellulose sodium based New Eye Drop Formulation 2

1 to 2 drops of carboxymethylcellulose sodium based New Eye Drop Formulation 2 in each eye at least twice daily for 90 days.

1 to 2 drops of carboxymethylcellulose sodium based Eye Drops (Refresh Tears®) in each eye at least twice daily for 90 days.

Sponsors

Allergan
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Current use of an artificial tear product at least twice daily for at least 3 months, on average * Ability/agreement to continue wearing existing spectacle correction (glasses) during study

Exclusion criteria

* Anticipated contact lens wear during study or contact lens use within 6 months * Active ocular infection or allergy * Use of any topical ophthalmic medications (eg, topical ophthalmic steroids, glaucoma drops) within 2 weeks * Use of any topical cyclosporine products within 3 months

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Ocular Surface Disease Index© (OSDI) ScoreBaseline, Day 90The OSDI is a questionnaire consisting of 12 questions assessing severity of dry eye using a 5-point scale where 0=none of the time to 4=all of the time. The total score is the sum of the individual scores normalized (standardized) to a severity scale of 0=no symptoms (best score) to 100=maximum severity (worst score). A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Much Better or Better in Near Visual Acuity (Low Contrast)Baseline, Day 90Near Visual Acuity was determined using the number of letters read correctly on a low contrast eye chart (gray letters on a white background). An increase in the number of letters read correctly indicated improvement. Much Better is defined as an increase of 10 or more letters read correctly at Day 90 compared to the worse eye at Baseline. Better is defined as an increase of 5 to 9 letters read correctly at Day 90 compared to the worse eye at Baseline.
Percentage of Participants Much Better or Better in Near Visual Acuity (High Contrast)Baseline, Day 90Near Visual Acuity was determined using the number of letters read correctly on a high contrast eye chart (black letters on a white background). An increase in the number of letters read correctly indicated improvement. Much Better is defined as an increase of 10 or more letters read correctly at Day 90 compared to the worse eye at Baseline. Better is defined as an increase of 5 to 9 letters read correctly at Day 90 compared to the worse eye at Baseline.
Change From Baseline in Tear Break-Up Time (TBUT)Baseline, Day 90TBUT is defined as the time (seconds) required for dry spots to appear on the surface of the eye after blinking. The longer it takes, the more stable the tear film. A positive number change from Baseline indicated improvement.
Change From Baseline in Visual Analog (VAS) Symptom Scale: DrynessBaseline, Day 90The participant rated the severity of their dry eye symptom: dryness using a VAS scale. Participants put a mark on a 100 millimeter line where 0 (far left on the line)=no symptoms to 100 (far right on the line)=most severe symptoms.
Change From Baseline in Conjunctival StainingBaseline, Day 90The conjunctiva is the clear membrane covering the white surface of the eye. Conjunctival staining following ocular administration of lissamine green dye was graded using a 6-point scale where 0=no staining to 5=severe staining over 6 areas of the white part of the eye for a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 30. The higher the score, the worse the dry eye condition. A negative number change from baseline represented a decrease in the severity of conjunctival staining (improvement).
Change From Baseline in Schirmer TestBaseline, Day 90The Schirmer Test measures the rate of the secretion of tears produced by the eye over 5 minutes. The results indicate the presence of dry eye where Normal=greater than or equal to 10 millimeters (mm) of tears and Dry Eye=less than 10 mm of tears). The smaller the number, the more severe the dry eye. A positive number change from baseline indicated an increase in tears (improvement).
Change From Baseline in Corneal StainingBaseline, Day 90The cornea is the transparent front part of the eye which covers the iris and pupil. Corneal staining following administration of fluorescein dye in the eye is graded using a 6-point scale where 0=no staining to 5=severe staining over 5 areas of the clear central part of the eye for a minimum score of 0 and maximum score of 25. The higher the grade score, the worse the dry eye condition. A negative number change from baseline represented a decrease in corneal staining (improvement).

Countries

Australia, Canada

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
New Eye Drop Formulation 1
1 to 2 drops of carboxymethylcellulose sodium based New Eye Drop Formulation 1 in each eye at least twice daily for 90 days.
101
New Eye Drop Formulation 2
1 to 2 drops of carboxymethylcellulose sodium based New Eye Drop Formulation 2 in each eye at least twice daily for 90 days.
100
Refresh Tears®
1 to 2 drops of carboxymethylcellulose sodium based Eye Drops (Refresh Tears®) in each eye at least twice daily for 90 days.
104
Total305

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalNew Eye Drop Formulation 1New Eye Drop Formulation 2Refresh Tears®
Age, Customized
40 to 60 years
118 Participants42 Participants33 Participants43 Participants
Age, Customized
< 40 years
29 Participants9 Participants13 Participants7 Participants
Age, Customized
> 60 years
158 Participants50 Participants54 Participants54 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
248 Participants78 Participants80 Participants90 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
57 Participants23 Participants20 Participants14 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 1020 / 1010 / 103
serious
Total, serious adverse events
2 / 1022 / 1011 / 103

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in Ocular Surface Disease Index© (OSDI) Score

The OSDI is a questionnaire consisting of 12 questions assessing severity of dry eye using a 5-point scale where 0=none of the time to 4=all of the time. The total score is the sum of the individual scores normalized (standardized) to a severity scale of 0=no symptoms (best score) to 100=maximum severity (worst score). A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 90

Population: Participants from the Intent-to-Treat population, that included all randomized participants.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
New Eye Drop Formulation 1Change From Baseline in Ocular Surface Disease Index© (OSDI) ScoreBaseline36.83 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.35
New Eye Drop Formulation 1Change From Baseline in Ocular Surface Disease Index© (OSDI) ScoreChange from Baseline at Day 90-14.72 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.319
New Eye Drop Formulation 2Change From Baseline in Ocular Surface Disease Index© (OSDI) ScoreBaseline38.51 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.512
New Eye Drop Formulation 2Change From Baseline in Ocular Surface Disease Index© (OSDI) ScoreChange from Baseline at Day 90-12.75 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.612
Refresh Tears®Change From Baseline in Ocular Surface Disease Index© (OSDI) ScoreBaseline38.86 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.88
Refresh Tears®Change From Baseline in Ocular Surface Disease Index© (OSDI) ScoreChange from Baseline at Day 90-14.49 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.443
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Conjunctival Staining

The conjunctiva is the clear membrane covering the white surface of the eye. Conjunctival staining following ocular administration of lissamine green dye was graded using a 6-point scale where 0=no staining to 5=severe staining over 6 areas of the white part of the eye for a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 30. The higher the score, the worse the dry eye condition. A negative number change from baseline represented a decrease in the severity of conjunctival staining (improvement).

Time frame: Baseline, Day 90

Population: Participants from the Intent-to-Treat population, that included all randomized participants.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
New Eye Drop Formulation 1Change From Baseline in Conjunctival StainingBaseline8.0 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.34
New Eye Drop Formulation 1Change From Baseline in Conjunctival StainingChange from Baseline at Day 90-2.7 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.72
New Eye Drop Formulation 2Change From Baseline in Conjunctival StainingBaseline7.8 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.45
New Eye Drop Formulation 2Change From Baseline in Conjunctival StainingChange from Baseline at Day 90-2.4 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.06
Refresh Tears®Change From Baseline in Conjunctival StainingBaseline8.2 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.44
Refresh Tears®Change From Baseline in Conjunctival StainingChange from Baseline at Day 90-2.7 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.36
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Corneal Staining

The cornea is the transparent front part of the eye which covers the iris and pupil. Corneal staining following administration of fluorescein dye in the eye is graded using a 6-point scale where 0=no staining to 5=severe staining over 5 areas of the clear central part of the eye for a minimum score of 0 and maximum score of 25. The higher the grade score, the worse the dry eye condition. A negative number change from baseline represented a decrease in corneal staining (improvement).

Time frame: Baseline, Day 90

Population: Participants from the Intent-to-Treat population, that included all randomized participants.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
New Eye Drop Formulation 1Change From Baseline in Corneal StainingBaseline6.4 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.97
New Eye Drop Formulation 1Change From Baseline in Corneal StainingChange from Baseline at Day 90-2.3 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.75
New Eye Drop Formulation 2Change From Baseline in Corneal StainingBaseline6.1 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.25
New Eye Drop Formulation 2Change From Baseline in Corneal StainingChange from Baseline at Day 90-2.0 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.36
Refresh Tears®Change From Baseline in Corneal StainingBaseline5.8 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.29
Refresh Tears®Change From Baseline in Corneal StainingChange from Baseline at Day 90-1.2 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.13
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Schirmer Test

The Schirmer Test measures the rate of the secretion of tears produced by the eye over 5 minutes. The results indicate the presence of dry eye where Normal=greater than or equal to 10 millimeters (mm) of tears and Dry Eye=less than 10 mm of tears). The smaller the number, the more severe the dry eye. A positive number change from baseline indicated an increase in tears (improvement).

Time frame: Baseline, Day 90

Population: Participants from the Intent-to-Treat population, that included all randomized participants.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
New Eye Drop Formulation 1Change From Baseline in Schirmer TestBaseline8.7 mmStandard Deviation 6.96
New Eye Drop Formulation 1Change From Baseline in Schirmer TestChange from Baseline at Day 901.2 mmStandard Deviation 7.07
New Eye Drop Formulation 2Change From Baseline in Schirmer TestBaseline10.3 mmStandard Deviation 7.17
New Eye Drop Formulation 2Change From Baseline in Schirmer TestChange from Baseline at Day 901.5 mmStandard Deviation 6.12
Refresh Tears®Change From Baseline in Schirmer TestBaseline8.9 mmStandard Deviation 6.16
Refresh Tears®Change From Baseline in Schirmer TestChange from Baseline at Day 901.1 mmStandard Deviation 7.07
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Tear Break-Up Time (TBUT)

TBUT is defined as the time (seconds) required for dry spots to appear on the surface of the eye after blinking. The longer it takes, the more stable the tear film. A positive number change from Baseline indicated improvement.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 90

Population: Participants from the Intent-to-Treat population, that included all randomized participants.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
New Eye Drop Formulation 1Change From Baseline in Tear Break-Up Time (TBUT)Baseline5.24 SecondsStandard Deviation 2.007
New Eye Drop Formulation 1Change From Baseline in Tear Break-Up Time (TBUT)Change from Baseline at Day 901.65 SecondsStandard Deviation 4.268
New Eye Drop Formulation 2Change From Baseline in Tear Break-Up Time (TBUT)Baseline5.22 SecondsStandard Deviation 1.87
New Eye Drop Formulation 2Change From Baseline in Tear Break-Up Time (TBUT)Change from Baseline at Day 901.97 SecondsStandard Deviation 3.294
Refresh Tears®Change From Baseline in Tear Break-Up Time (TBUT)Baseline5.05 SecondsStandard Deviation 1.894
Refresh Tears®Change From Baseline in Tear Break-Up Time (TBUT)Change from Baseline at Day 901.27 SecondsStandard Deviation 2.837
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Visual Analog (VAS) Symptom Scale: Dryness

The participant rated the severity of their dry eye symptom: dryness using a VAS scale. Participants put a mark on a 100 millimeter line where 0 (far left on the line)=no symptoms to 100 (far right on the line)=most severe symptoms.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 90

Population: Participants from the Intent-to-Treat population, that included all randomized participants.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
New Eye Drop Formulation 1Change From Baseline in Visual Analog (VAS) Symptom Scale: DrynessBaseline61.1 millimetersStandard Deviation 22.1
New Eye Drop Formulation 1Change From Baseline in Visual Analog (VAS) Symptom Scale: DrynessChange from Baseline at Day 90-24.2 millimetersStandard Deviation 30.78
New Eye Drop Formulation 2Change From Baseline in Visual Analog (VAS) Symptom Scale: DrynessBaseline64.0 millimetersStandard Deviation 19.05
New Eye Drop Formulation 2Change From Baseline in Visual Analog (VAS) Symptom Scale: DrynessChange from Baseline at Day 90-19.2 millimetersStandard Deviation 29.44
Refresh Tears®Change From Baseline in Visual Analog (VAS) Symptom Scale: DrynessBaseline60.9 millimetersStandard Deviation 18.98
Refresh Tears®Change From Baseline in Visual Analog (VAS) Symptom Scale: DrynessChange from Baseline at Day 90-20.9 millimetersStandard Deviation 29.2
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Much Better or Better in Near Visual Acuity (High Contrast)

Near Visual Acuity was determined using the number of letters read correctly on a high contrast eye chart (black letters on a white background). An increase in the number of letters read correctly indicated improvement. Much Better is defined as an increase of 10 or more letters read correctly at Day 90 compared to the worse eye at Baseline. Better is defined as an increase of 5 to 9 letters read correctly at Day 90 compared to the worse eye at Baseline.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 90

Population: Participants from the Intent-to-Treat population, that included all randomized participants.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
New Eye Drop Formulation 1Percentage of Participants Much Better or Better in Near Visual Acuity (High Contrast)Much Better7.0 Percentage of participants
New Eye Drop Formulation 1Percentage of Participants Much Better or Better in Near Visual Acuity (High Contrast)Better15.0 Percentage of participants
New Eye Drop Formulation 2Percentage of Participants Much Better or Better in Near Visual Acuity (High Contrast)Much Better6.0 Percentage of participants
New Eye Drop Formulation 2Percentage of Participants Much Better or Better in Near Visual Acuity (High Contrast)Better20.0 Percentage of participants
Refresh Tears®Percentage of Participants Much Better or Better in Near Visual Acuity (High Contrast)Much Better4.8 Percentage of participants
Refresh Tears®Percentage of Participants Much Better or Better in Near Visual Acuity (High Contrast)Better22.1 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Much Better or Better in Near Visual Acuity (Low Contrast)

Near Visual Acuity was determined using the number of letters read correctly on a low contrast eye chart (gray letters on a white background). An increase in the number of letters read correctly indicated improvement. Much Better is defined as an increase of 10 or more letters read correctly at Day 90 compared to the worse eye at Baseline. Better is defined as an increase of 5 to 9 letters read correctly at Day 90 compared to the worse eye at Baseline.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 90

Population: Participants from the Intent-to-Treat population, that included all randomized participants.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
New Eye Drop Formulation 1Percentage of Participants Much Better or Better in Near Visual Acuity (Low Contrast)Much better5.0 Percentage of participants
New Eye Drop Formulation 1Percentage of Participants Much Better or Better in Near Visual Acuity (Low Contrast)Better22.0 Percentage of participants
New Eye Drop Formulation 2Percentage of Participants Much Better or Better in Near Visual Acuity (Low Contrast)Much better8.0 Percentage of participants
New Eye Drop Formulation 2Percentage of Participants Much Better or Better in Near Visual Acuity (Low Contrast)Better21.0 Percentage of participants
Refresh Tears®Percentage of Participants Much Better or Better in Near Visual Acuity (Low Contrast)Much better5.8 Percentage of participants
Refresh Tears®Percentage of Participants Much Better or Better in Near Visual Acuity (Low Contrast)Better30.8 Percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026