Dry Eye Syndromes
Conditions
Brief summary
This study will investigate the safety, efficacy and acceptability of two new eye drop formulations compared with Refresh Tears® in patients with dry eye disease.
Interventions
1 to 2 drops of carboxymethylcellulose sodium based New Eye Drop Formulation 1 in each eye at least twice daily for 90 days.
1 to 2 drops of carboxymethylcellulose sodium based New Eye Drop Formulation 2 in each eye at least twice daily for 90 days.
1 to 2 drops of carboxymethylcellulose sodium based Eye Drops (Refresh Tears®) in each eye at least twice daily for 90 days.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Current use of an artificial tear product at least twice daily for at least 3 months, on average * Ability/agreement to continue wearing existing spectacle correction (glasses) during study
Exclusion criteria
* Anticipated contact lens wear during study or contact lens use within 6 months * Active ocular infection or allergy * Use of any topical ophthalmic medications (eg, topical ophthalmic steroids, glaucoma drops) within 2 weeks * Use of any topical cyclosporine products within 3 months
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline in Ocular Surface Disease Index© (OSDI) Score | Baseline, Day 90 | The OSDI is a questionnaire consisting of 12 questions assessing severity of dry eye using a 5-point scale where 0=none of the time to 4=all of the time. The total score is the sum of the individual scores normalized (standardized) to a severity scale of 0=no symptoms (best score) to 100=maximum severity (worst score). A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants Much Better or Better in Near Visual Acuity (Low Contrast) | Baseline, Day 90 | Near Visual Acuity was determined using the number of letters read correctly on a low contrast eye chart (gray letters on a white background). An increase in the number of letters read correctly indicated improvement. Much Better is defined as an increase of 10 or more letters read correctly at Day 90 compared to the worse eye at Baseline. Better is defined as an increase of 5 to 9 letters read correctly at Day 90 compared to the worse eye at Baseline. |
| Percentage of Participants Much Better or Better in Near Visual Acuity (High Contrast) | Baseline, Day 90 | Near Visual Acuity was determined using the number of letters read correctly on a high contrast eye chart (black letters on a white background). An increase in the number of letters read correctly indicated improvement. Much Better is defined as an increase of 10 or more letters read correctly at Day 90 compared to the worse eye at Baseline. Better is defined as an increase of 5 to 9 letters read correctly at Day 90 compared to the worse eye at Baseline. |
| Change From Baseline in Tear Break-Up Time (TBUT) | Baseline, Day 90 | TBUT is defined as the time (seconds) required for dry spots to appear on the surface of the eye after blinking. The longer it takes, the more stable the tear film. A positive number change from Baseline indicated improvement. |
| Change From Baseline in Visual Analog (VAS) Symptom Scale: Dryness | Baseline, Day 90 | The participant rated the severity of their dry eye symptom: dryness using a VAS scale. Participants put a mark on a 100 millimeter line where 0 (far left on the line)=no symptoms to 100 (far right on the line)=most severe symptoms. |
| Change From Baseline in Conjunctival Staining | Baseline, Day 90 | The conjunctiva is the clear membrane covering the white surface of the eye. Conjunctival staining following ocular administration of lissamine green dye was graded using a 6-point scale where 0=no staining to 5=severe staining over 6 areas of the white part of the eye for a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 30. The higher the score, the worse the dry eye condition. A negative number change from baseline represented a decrease in the severity of conjunctival staining (improvement). |
| Change From Baseline in Schirmer Test | Baseline, Day 90 | The Schirmer Test measures the rate of the secretion of tears produced by the eye over 5 minutes. The results indicate the presence of dry eye where Normal=greater than or equal to 10 millimeters (mm) of tears and Dry Eye=less than 10 mm of tears). The smaller the number, the more severe the dry eye. A positive number change from baseline indicated an increase in tears (improvement). |
| Change From Baseline in Corneal Staining | Baseline, Day 90 | The cornea is the transparent front part of the eye which covers the iris and pupil. Corneal staining following administration of fluorescein dye in the eye is graded using a 6-point scale where 0=no staining to 5=severe staining over 5 areas of the clear central part of the eye for a minimum score of 0 and maximum score of 25. The higher the grade score, the worse the dry eye condition. A negative number change from baseline represented a decrease in corneal staining (improvement). |
Countries
Australia, Canada
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| New Eye Drop Formulation 1 1 to 2 drops of carboxymethylcellulose sodium based New Eye Drop Formulation 1 in each eye at least twice daily for 90 days. | 101 |
| New Eye Drop Formulation 2 1 to 2 drops of carboxymethylcellulose sodium based New Eye Drop Formulation 2 in each eye at least twice daily for 90 days. | 100 |
| Refresh Tears® 1 to 2 drops of carboxymethylcellulose sodium based Eye Drops (Refresh Tears®) in each eye at least twice daily for 90 days. | 104 |
| Total | 305 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Total | New Eye Drop Formulation 1 | New Eye Drop Formulation 2 | Refresh Tears® |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Customized 40 to 60 years | 118 Participants | 42 Participants | 33 Participants | 43 Participants |
| Age, Customized < 40 years | 29 Participants | 9 Participants | 13 Participants | 7 Participants |
| Age, Customized > 60 years | 158 Participants | 50 Participants | 54 Participants | 54 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 248 Participants | 78 Participants | 80 Participants | 90 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 57 Participants | 23 Participants | 20 Participants | 14 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — | — / — | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 102 | 0 / 101 | 0 / 103 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 2 / 102 | 2 / 101 | 1 / 103 |
Outcome results
Change From Baseline in Ocular Surface Disease Index© (OSDI) Score
The OSDI is a questionnaire consisting of 12 questions assessing severity of dry eye using a 5-point scale where 0=none of the time to 4=all of the time. The total score is the sum of the individual scores normalized (standardized) to a severity scale of 0=no symptoms (best score) to 100=maximum severity (worst score). A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement.
Time frame: Baseline, Day 90
Population: Participants from the Intent-to-Treat population, that included all randomized participants.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| New Eye Drop Formulation 1 | Change From Baseline in Ocular Surface Disease Index© (OSDI) Score | Baseline | 36.83 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 13.35 |
| New Eye Drop Formulation 1 | Change From Baseline in Ocular Surface Disease Index© (OSDI) Score | Change from Baseline at Day 90 | -14.72 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.319 |
| New Eye Drop Formulation 2 | Change From Baseline in Ocular Surface Disease Index© (OSDI) Score | Baseline | 38.51 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.512 |
| New Eye Drop Formulation 2 | Change From Baseline in Ocular Surface Disease Index© (OSDI) Score | Change from Baseline at Day 90 | -12.75 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.612 |
| Refresh Tears® | Change From Baseline in Ocular Surface Disease Index© (OSDI) Score | Baseline | 38.86 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.88 |
| Refresh Tears® | Change From Baseline in Ocular Surface Disease Index© (OSDI) Score | Change from Baseline at Day 90 | -14.49 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.443 |
Change From Baseline in Conjunctival Staining
The conjunctiva is the clear membrane covering the white surface of the eye. Conjunctival staining following ocular administration of lissamine green dye was graded using a 6-point scale where 0=no staining to 5=severe staining over 6 areas of the white part of the eye for a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 30. The higher the score, the worse the dry eye condition. A negative number change from baseline represented a decrease in the severity of conjunctival staining (improvement).
Time frame: Baseline, Day 90
Population: Participants from the Intent-to-Treat population, that included all randomized participants.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| New Eye Drop Formulation 1 | Change From Baseline in Conjunctival Staining | Baseline | 8.0 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.34 |
| New Eye Drop Formulation 1 | Change From Baseline in Conjunctival Staining | Change from Baseline at Day 90 | -2.7 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.72 |
| New Eye Drop Formulation 2 | Change From Baseline in Conjunctival Staining | Baseline | 7.8 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.45 |
| New Eye Drop Formulation 2 | Change From Baseline in Conjunctival Staining | Change from Baseline at Day 90 | -2.4 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.06 |
| Refresh Tears® | Change From Baseline in Conjunctival Staining | Baseline | 8.2 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.44 |
| Refresh Tears® | Change From Baseline in Conjunctival Staining | Change from Baseline at Day 90 | -2.7 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.36 |
Change From Baseline in Corneal Staining
The cornea is the transparent front part of the eye which covers the iris and pupil. Corneal staining following administration of fluorescein dye in the eye is graded using a 6-point scale where 0=no staining to 5=severe staining over 5 areas of the clear central part of the eye for a minimum score of 0 and maximum score of 25. The higher the grade score, the worse the dry eye condition. A negative number change from baseline represented a decrease in corneal staining (improvement).
Time frame: Baseline, Day 90
Population: Participants from the Intent-to-Treat population, that included all randomized participants.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| New Eye Drop Formulation 1 | Change From Baseline in Corneal Staining | Baseline | 6.4 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.97 |
| New Eye Drop Formulation 1 | Change From Baseline in Corneal Staining | Change from Baseline at Day 90 | -2.3 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.75 |
| New Eye Drop Formulation 2 | Change From Baseline in Corneal Staining | Baseline | 6.1 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.25 |
| New Eye Drop Formulation 2 | Change From Baseline in Corneal Staining | Change from Baseline at Day 90 | -2.0 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.36 |
| Refresh Tears® | Change From Baseline in Corneal Staining | Baseline | 5.8 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.29 |
| Refresh Tears® | Change From Baseline in Corneal Staining | Change from Baseline at Day 90 | -1.2 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.13 |
Change From Baseline in Schirmer Test
The Schirmer Test measures the rate of the secretion of tears produced by the eye over 5 minutes. The results indicate the presence of dry eye where Normal=greater than or equal to 10 millimeters (mm) of tears and Dry Eye=less than 10 mm of tears). The smaller the number, the more severe the dry eye. A positive number change from baseline indicated an increase in tears (improvement).
Time frame: Baseline, Day 90
Population: Participants from the Intent-to-Treat population, that included all randomized participants.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| New Eye Drop Formulation 1 | Change From Baseline in Schirmer Test | Baseline | 8.7 mm | Standard Deviation 6.96 |
| New Eye Drop Formulation 1 | Change From Baseline in Schirmer Test | Change from Baseline at Day 90 | 1.2 mm | Standard Deviation 7.07 |
| New Eye Drop Formulation 2 | Change From Baseline in Schirmer Test | Baseline | 10.3 mm | Standard Deviation 7.17 |
| New Eye Drop Formulation 2 | Change From Baseline in Schirmer Test | Change from Baseline at Day 90 | 1.5 mm | Standard Deviation 6.12 |
| Refresh Tears® | Change From Baseline in Schirmer Test | Baseline | 8.9 mm | Standard Deviation 6.16 |
| Refresh Tears® | Change From Baseline in Schirmer Test | Change from Baseline at Day 90 | 1.1 mm | Standard Deviation 7.07 |
Change From Baseline in Tear Break-Up Time (TBUT)
TBUT is defined as the time (seconds) required for dry spots to appear on the surface of the eye after blinking. The longer it takes, the more stable the tear film. A positive number change from Baseline indicated improvement.
Time frame: Baseline, Day 90
Population: Participants from the Intent-to-Treat population, that included all randomized participants.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| New Eye Drop Formulation 1 | Change From Baseline in Tear Break-Up Time (TBUT) | Baseline | 5.24 Seconds | Standard Deviation 2.007 |
| New Eye Drop Formulation 1 | Change From Baseline in Tear Break-Up Time (TBUT) | Change from Baseline at Day 90 | 1.65 Seconds | Standard Deviation 4.268 |
| New Eye Drop Formulation 2 | Change From Baseline in Tear Break-Up Time (TBUT) | Baseline | 5.22 Seconds | Standard Deviation 1.87 |
| New Eye Drop Formulation 2 | Change From Baseline in Tear Break-Up Time (TBUT) | Change from Baseline at Day 90 | 1.97 Seconds | Standard Deviation 3.294 |
| Refresh Tears® | Change From Baseline in Tear Break-Up Time (TBUT) | Baseline | 5.05 Seconds | Standard Deviation 1.894 |
| Refresh Tears® | Change From Baseline in Tear Break-Up Time (TBUT) | Change from Baseline at Day 90 | 1.27 Seconds | Standard Deviation 2.837 |
Change From Baseline in Visual Analog (VAS) Symptom Scale: Dryness
The participant rated the severity of their dry eye symptom: dryness using a VAS scale. Participants put a mark on a 100 millimeter line where 0 (far left on the line)=no symptoms to 100 (far right on the line)=most severe symptoms.
Time frame: Baseline, Day 90
Population: Participants from the Intent-to-Treat population, that included all randomized participants.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| New Eye Drop Formulation 1 | Change From Baseline in Visual Analog (VAS) Symptom Scale: Dryness | Baseline | 61.1 millimeters | Standard Deviation 22.1 |
| New Eye Drop Formulation 1 | Change From Baseline in Visual Analog (VAS) Symptom Scale: Dryness | Change from Baseline at Day 90 | -24.2 millimeters | Standard Deviation 30.78 |
| New Eye Drop Formulation 2 | Change From Baseline in Visual Analog (VAS) Symptom Scale: Dryness | Baseline | 64.0 millimeters | Standard Deviation 19.05 |
| New Eye Drop Formulation 2 | Change From Baseline in Visual Analog (VAS) Symptom Scale: Dryness | Change from Baseline at Day 90 | -19.2 millimeters | Standard Deviation 29.44 |
| Refresh Tears® | Change From Baseline in Visual Analog (VAS) Symptom Scale: Dryness | Baseline | 60.9 millimeters | Standard Deviation 18.98 |
| Refresh Tears® | Change From Baseline in Visual Analog (VAS) Symptom Scale: Dryness | Change from Baseline at Day 90 | -20.9 millimeters | Standard Deviation 29.2 |
Percentage of Participants Much Better or Better in Near Visual Acuity (High Contrast)
Near Visual Acuity was determined using the number of letters read correctly on a high contrast eye chart (black letters on a white background). An increase in the number of letters read correctly indicated improvement. Much Better is defined as an increase of 10 or more letters read correctly at Day 90 compared to the worse eye at Baseline. Better is defined as an increase of 5 to 9 letters read correctly at Day 90 compared to the worse eye at Baseline.
Time frame: Baseline, Day 90
Population: Participants from the Intent-to-Treat population, that included all randomized participants.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| New Eye Drop Formulation 1 | Percentage of Participants Much Better or Better in Near Visual Acuity (High Contrast) | Much Better | 7.0 Percentage of participants |
| New Eye Drop Formulation 1 | Percentage of Participants Much Better or Better in Near Visual Acuity (High Contrast) | Better | 15.0 Percentage of participants |
| New Eye Drop Formulation 2 | Percentage of Participants Much Better or Better in Near Visual Acuity (High Contrast) | Much Better | 6.0 Percentage of participants |
| New Eye Drop Formulation 2 | Percentage of Participants Much Better or Better in Near Visual Acuity (High Contrast) | Better | 20.0 Percentage of participants |
| Refresh Tears® | Percentage of Participants Much Better or Better in Near Visual Acuity (High Contrast) | Much Better | 4.8 Percentage of participants |
| Refresh Tears® | Percentage of Participants Much Better or Better in Near Visual Acuity (High Contrast) | Better | 22.1 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants Much Better or Better in Near Visual Acuity (Low Contrast)
Near Visual Acuity was determined using the number of letters read correctly on a low contrast eye chart (gray letters on a white background). An increase in the number of letters read correctly indicated improvement. Much Better is defined as an increase of 10 or more letters read correctly at Day 90 compared to the worse eye at Baseline. Better is defined as an increase of 5 to 9 letters read correctly at Day 90 compared to the worse eye at Baseline.
Time frame: Baseline, Day 90
Population: Participants from the Intent-to-Treat population, that included all randomized participants.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| New Eye Drop Formulation 1 | Percentage of Participants Much Better or Better in Near Visual Acuity (Low Contrast) | Much better | 5.0 Percentage of participants |
| New Eye Drop Formulation 1 | Percentage of Participants Much Better or Better in Near Visual Acuity (Low Contrast) | Better | 22.0 Percentage of participants |
| New Eye Drop Formulation 2 | Percentage of Participants Much Better or Better in Near Visual Acuity (Low Contrast) | Much better | 8.0 Percentage of participants |
| New Eye Drop Formulation 2 | Percentage of Participants Much Better or Better in Near Visual Acuity (Low Contrast) | Better | 21.0 Percentage of participants |
| Refresh Tears® | Percentage of Participants Much Better or Better in Near Visual Acuity (Low Contrast) | Much better | 5.8 Percentage of participants |
| Refresh Tears® | Percentage of Participants Much Better or Better in Near Visual Acuity (Low Contrast) | Better | 30.8 Percentage of participants |