Skip to content

The Safety and Effectiveness of UroLift: LIFT Pivotal Study

Luminal Improvement Following Prostatic Tissue Approximation for the Treatment of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01294150
Acronym
LIFT
Enrollment
206
Registered
2011-02-11
Start date
2011-02-28
Completion date
2017-07-05
Last updated
2018-09-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

Brief summary

The purpose of the study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the UroLift(R) System when used in subjects with symptomatic benign hyperplasia (BPH). Primary effectiveness will be achieved by looking at the improvement of International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and safety will be reviewed based on pertinent adverse events.

Detailed description

The randomized portion of the study is a prospective, multicenter, multinational, 2:1 randomized, single-blinded controlled clinical trial comparing the IPSS of the treatment group to the IPSS of the control group at the 3 month follow-up. Subjects in the active treatment group undergo UroLift system treatment. Subjects in the control group undergo a cystoscopy procedure. All subjects will be followed through 12 months, and through 5 years for those that receive the investigational device.

Interventions

The NeoTract UroLift System is a medical device approved for sale in the United States, European Union, and several other countries (see www.urolift.com). It was developed for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) associated with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH). During the procedure, an implant is delivered into the prostatic lobe obstructing the urethra and restricting urine flow. The distal end of the device is used to compress the lobe then the implant is delivered to retain the lobe in position, thereby increasing the urethral opening and reducing the fluid obstruction through the prostatic urethra.

OTHERCystoscopy

The Control Group will undergo cystoscopy.

DEVICECrossover

Subjects crossed over and received the UroLift System from the Control Group.

Sponsors

NeoTract, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
50 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Males age of 50 years or older diagnosed with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH)

Exclusion criteria

* Size, volume,length of prostate

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Collection of Post-treatment Catheterization for SafetyCath within first 3 days post-procedure which extended beyond 7 days, up to 12 daysThe primary safety endpoint is an assessment of the rate of extended post-operative urinary catheterization in the subjects randomized to the UroLift group of the study in the ITT group. The extended post-operative urinary catheterization rate is defined as including those subjects who required catheterization within the first 3 days as part of post-operative management for inability to void, and required the catheter for more than 7 days. 2/140 met this endpoint.
Comparison of IPSS for Efficacy3 monthThe UroLift system will be considered superior to the Control if the mean International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) change (improvement) from baseline at 3 months demonstrates a minimum statistical margin of 25% compared to mean improvement from baseline for cystoscopy alone. The IPSS is an 8 question (7 symptom questions + 1 quality of life question) written screening tool used to screen for, rapidly diagnose, track the symptoms of, and suggest management of the symptoms of the disease benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). SCORING: 0-7 Mildly symptomatic 8-19 Moderately symptomatic 20-35 Severely symptomatic
Mean UroLift Improvement in IPSS at 12 Months12 monthsThe International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) is a standardized 8 question (7 symptom questions + 1 quality of life question) written screening tool used to screen for, rapidly diagnose, track the symptoms of, and suggest management of the symptoms of the disease benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Those patients scoring 7 or below are generally considered mildly symptomatic, whereas 20 or above is considered severely symptomatic. To meet co-primary effectiveness endpoint, the lower bound of a one-sided 97.5% confidence interval of IPSS mean percent change from baseline at Month 12 in the UroLift group must be greater than or equal to 30%.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Sexual Function12 MonthsOver the 12 month follow-up period, the proportion of UroLift patients who experience de novo sustained erectile dysfunction and retrograde ejaculation will be reported. Control subjects are not included in this analysis since controls could crossover option opened at 3 months.

Countries

Australia, Canada, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The first subject was enrolled into the L.I.F.T. clinical study on February 8, 2011. Study enrollment was completed on December 14, 2011 and the final subject reached the 12-month study endpoint on December 5, 2012.

Pre-assignment details

Washout of for 3 months (5ARI) and 2 week (alpha blocker) required before baseline questionnaires.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
UroLift System
Average of 4.9 implants per prostate implanted. The prostatic urethral lift is performed by placing permanent transprostatic implants to lift apart the prostate lobes and reduce urethral obstruction.
140
Cystoscopy
Sham treatment entailed rigid cystoscopy, a blinding screen and sounds that mimicked those of the prostatic urethral lift procedure.
66
Total206

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyPhysician Decision22

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCystoscopyTotalUroLift System
Age, Continuous65 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8
66 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.6
67 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.6
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
3 Participants5 Participants2 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
63 Participants199 Participants136 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants5 Participants5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
3 Participants5 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
62 Participants193 Participants131 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Australia
11 participants37 participants26 participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
10 participants30 participants20 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
45 participants139 participants94 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
66 Participants206 Participants140 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
9 / 1404 / 530 / 13
other
Total, other adverse events
133 / 14049 / 530 / 13
serious
Total, serious adverse events
52 / 14019 / 530 / 13

Outcome results

Primary

Collection of Post-treatment Catheterization for Safety

The primary safety endpoint is an assessment of the rate of extended post-operative urinary catheterization in the subjects randomized to the UroLift group of the study in the ITT group. The extended post-operative urinary catheterization rate is defined as including those subjects who required catheterization within the first 3 days as part of post-operative management for inability to void, and required the catheter for more than 7 days. 2/140 met this endpoint.

Time frame: Cath within first 3 days post-procedure which extended beyond 7 days, up to 12 days

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
UroLift SystemCollection of Post-treatment Catheterization for Safety2 participants
Primary

Comparison of IPSS for Efficacy

The UroLift system will be considered superior to the Control if the mean International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) change (improvement) from baseline at 3 months demonstrates a minimum statistical margin of 25% compared to mean improvement from baseline for cystoscopy alone. The IPSS is an 8 question (7 symptom questions + 1 quality of life question) written screening tool used to screen for, rapidly diagnose, track the symptoms of, and suggest management of the symptoms of the disease benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). SCORING: 0-7 Mildly symptomatic 8-19 Moderately symptomatic 20-35 Severely symptomatic

Time frame: 3 month

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
UroLift SystemComparison of IPSS for Efficacy11.1 IPSS total scoreStandard Deviation 7.67
CystoscopyComparison of IPSS for Efficacy5.9 IPSS total scoreStandard Deviation 7.66
p-value: 0.003t-test, 2 sided
Primary

Mean UroLift Improvement in IPSS at 12 Months

The International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) is a standardized 8 question (7 symptom questions + 1 quality of life question) written screening tool used to screen for, rapidly diagnose, track the symptoms of, and suggest management of the symptoms of the disease benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Those patients scoring 7 or below are generally considered mildly symptomatic, whereas 20 or above is considered severely symptomatic. To meet co-primary effectiveness endpoint, the lower bound of a one-sided 97.5% confidence interval of IPSS mean percent change from baseline at Month 12 in the UroLift group must be greater than or equal to 30%.

Time frame: 12 months

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
UroLift SystemMean UroLift Improvement in IPSS at 12 Months45.5 % IPSS Score Improvement
Secondary

Sexual Function

Over the 12 month follow-up period, the proportion of UroLift patients who experience de novo sustained erectile dysfunction and retrograde ejaculation will be reported. Control subjects are not included in this analysis since controls could crossover option opened at 3 months.

Time frame: 12 Months

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
UroLift SystemSexual Function0.0 % of Subjects

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 24, 2026