Skip to content

Case Series Study of Biliary Tract Cancer Patients in Japan

Retrospective Analysis of the Difference of Prognosis Between Unresectable and Recurrent Biliary Tract Cancer

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01294085
Enrollment
300
Registered
2011-02-11
Start date
2010-11-30
Completion date
2011-08-31
Last updated
2011-11-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Biliary Tract Cancer

Brief summary

To assess the difference of prognosis between unresectable and recurrent biliary tract cancer and evaluate prognostic factors.

Detailed description

Most patients of biliary tract cancer have advanced disease at diagnosis and often relapse despite surgery. Combination therapy of gemcitabine and cisplatin could be a standard therapy for this kind of cancer with the evidence of phase III study compared with gemcitabine alone. However the prognosis and the tolerability of chemotherapy in the patients with recurrent biliary tract cancer after radical resection might differ from those of unresectable biliary tract cancer, because the dose intensity of chemotherapy can be influenced by adjuvant chemotherapy and/or hepatic resection.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Kansai Hepatobiliary Oncology Group
Lead SponsorNETWORK

Study design

Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Unresectable or recurrent biliary tract cancer

Exclusion criteria

* None

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
One year survival rate1 year

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Overall survival time3 years
Number of participants with adverse events3 years
Progression free survival3 years

Countries

Japan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026