Skip to content

Prospective Study of Lens Performance of a Monthly Replacement Lens at Two Weeks and Four Weeks

Prospective Study of Lens Performance of a Monthly Replacement Lens at Two Weeks and Four Weeks

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01293240
Enrollment
117
Registered
2011-02-10
Start date
2010-12-31
Completion date
2011-04-30
Last updated
2012-07-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Myopia, Astigmatism, Presbyopia

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the overall performance of a monthly replacement contact lens when worn for one month and when worn for two weeks.

Interventions

Commercially marketed, silicone hydrogel contact lens worn bilaterally on a daily wear basis for up to 30 days with a two week and four week evaluation visit.

Sponsors

CIBA VISION
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Habitual and successful wearers of contact lenses made of lotrafilcon B material for at least 4 weeks prior to enrollment. * Good general health. * Sphere requirement in the range +6.00 to -10.00 with astigmatism or multifocal correction or no astigmatism or multifocal correction. * Ability to comply with all protocol-mandated procedures and to attend all scheduled office visits. * Other protocol-defined inclusion criteria may apply.

Exclusion criteria

* Anterior segment abnormalities (i.e., cataracts, opacities, etc.) or active anterior segment disease. * Administration of any investigational drug or device within 14 days of study initiation. * Use of any eye drops with a pharmacological effect within 7 days of Visit 1. * Known local or systemic hypersensitivity to contact lens cleaning and disinfecting solutions. * Post-refractive surgery. * Currently pregnant or lactating by case history. * Other protocol-defined

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall Comfort2 weeksOverall comfort was assessed and reported by the participant on a questionnaire as a single, retrospective evaluation of 2 weeks of wear. Overall comfort was measured on a 10-point scale, with 1 being poor and 10 being excellent.
End of Day Dryness2 weeksEnd of day dryness was assessed and reported by the participant on a questionnaire as a single, retrospective evaluation of 2 weeks of wear. End of day dryness was measured on a 10-point scale, with 1 being very dry and 10 being not dry.
Ocular Redness2 weeksOcular redness was assessed and reported by the participant on a questionnaire as a single, retrospective evaluation of 2 weeks of wear. Ocular redness was measured on a 10-point scale, with 1 being very red and 10 being not red.
Visual Clarity2 weeksVisual clarity was assessed and reported by the participant on a questionnaire as a single, retrospective evaluation of 2 weeks of wear. Visual clarity was measured on a 10-point scale, with 1 being poor and 10 being excellent.
Lens Deposits2 weeksProtein and lipid deposits on the contact lens surface were assessed for each eye by the investigator using a biomicroscope, which magnifies the appearance of the contact lens on the wearer's eye. Deposits were graded on a scale of 0 to 4, with 0 being none and 4 being severe.
Corrected Visual Acuity2 weeksEach eye was tested individually while the participant read distant charts in normal lighting. Corrected visual acuity was measured using a Snellen chart, which was converted into logMAR units (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution). A 20/20 Snellen acuity equates to a logMAR acuity of 0.0 and is considered normal distance eyesight. Positive logMAR values indicate poorer vision, and negative values denote better visual acuity.

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Lotrafilcon B
Commercially marketed, silicone hydrogel contact lenses worn bilaterally on a daily wear basis for up to 30 days with a two week and four week evaluation visit.
117
Total117

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyNoncompliance2

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicLotrafilcon B
Age Continuous45.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.6
Gender
Female
79 participants
Gender
Male
36 participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 117
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 117

Outcome results

Primary

Corrected Visual Acuity

Each eye was tested individually while the participant read distant charts in normal lighting. Corrected visual acuity was measured using a Snellen chart, which was converted into logMAR units (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution). A 20/20 Snellen acuity equates to a logMAR acuity of 0.0 and is considered normal distance eyesight. Positive logMAR values indicate poorer vision, and negative values denote better visual acuity.

Time frame: 2 weeks

Population: Analysis conducted per protocol, with exclusions due to reasons such as protocol deviations as determined by masked review; discontinuations; and/or missing responses.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Lotrafilcon BCorrected Visual Acuity0.04 logMARStandard Deviation 0.07
Primary

Corrected Visual Acuity

Each eye was tested individually while the participant read distant charts in normal lighting. Corrected visual acuity was measured using a Snellen chart, which was converted into logMAR units (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution). A 20/20 Snellen acuity equates to a logMAR acuity of 0.0 and is considered normal distance eyesight. Positive logMAR values indicate poorer vision, and negative values denote better visual acuity.

Time frame: 4 weeks

Population: Analysis conducted per protocol, with exclusions due to reasons such as protocol deviations as determined by masked review; discontinuations; and/or missing responses.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Lotrafilcon BCorrected Visual Acuity0.04 logMARStandard Deviation 0.08
Primary

End of Day Dryness

End of day dryness was assessed and reported by the participant on a questionnaire as a single, retrospective evaluation of 2 weeks of wear. End of day dryness was measured on a 10-point scale, with 1 being very dry and 10 being not dry.

Time frame: 2 weeks

Population: Analysis conducted per protocol, with exclusions due to reasons such as protocol deviations as determined by masked review; discontinuations; and/or missing responses.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Lotrafilcon BEnd of Day Dryness7.4 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.1
Primary

End of Day Dryness

End of day dryness was assessed and reported by the participant on a questionnaire as a single, retrospective evaluation of 4 weeks of wear. End of day dryness was measured on a 10-point scale, with 1 being very dry and 10 being not dry.

Time frame: 4 weeks

Population: Analysis conducted per protocol, with exclusions due to reasons such as protocol deviations as determined by masked review; discontinuations; and/or missing responses.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Lotrafilcon BEnd of Day Dryness7.0 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.4
Primary

Lens Deposits

Protein and lipid deposits on the contact lens surface were assessed for each eye by the investigator using a biomicroscope, which magnifies the appearance of the contact lens on the wearer's eye. Deposits were graded on a scale of 0 to 4, with 0 being none and 4 being severe.

Time frame: 4 weeks

Population: Analysis conducted per protocol, with exclusions due to reasons such as protocol deviations as determined by masked review; discontinuations; and/or missing responses.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Lotrafilcon BLens Deposits0.8 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Primary

Lens Deposits

Protein and lipid deposits on the contact lens surface were assessed for each eye by the investigator using a biomicroscope, which magnifies the appearance of the contact lens on the wearer's eye. Deposits were graded on a scale of 0 to 4, with 0 being none and 4 being severe.

Time frame: 2 weeks

Population: Analysis conducted per protocol, with exclusions due to reasons such as protocol deviations as determined by masked review; discontinuations; and/or missing responses.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Lotrafilcon BLens Deposits0.6 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Primary

Ocular Redness

Ocular redness was assessed and reported by the participant on a questionnaire as a single, retrospective evaluation of 4 weeks of wear. Ocular redness was measured on a 10-point scale, with 1 being very red and 10 being not red.

Time frame: 4 weeks

Population: Analysis conducted per protocol, with exclusions due to reasons such as protocol deviations as determined by masked review; discontinuations; and/or missing responses.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Lotrafilcon BOcular Redness9.0 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.6
Primary

Ocular Redness

Ocular redness was assessed and reported by the participant on a questionnaire as a single, retrospective evaluation of 2 weeks of wear. Ocular redness was measured on a 10-point scale, with 1 being very red and 10 being not red.

Time frame: 2 weeks

Population: Analysis conducted per protocol, with exclusions due to reasons such as protocol deviations as determined by masked review; discontinuations; and/or missing responses.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Lotrafilcon BOcular Redness9.1 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.4
Primary

Overall Comfort

Overall comfort was assessed and reported by the participant on a questionnaire as a single, retrospective evaluation of 4 weeks of wear. Overall comfort was measured on a 10-point scale, with 1 being poor and 10 being excellent.

Time frame: 4 weeks

Population: Analysis conducted per protocol, with exclusions due to reasons such as protocol deviations as determined by masked review; discontinuations; and/or missing responses.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Lotrafilcon BOverall Comfort8.1 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.7
Primary

Overall Comfort

Overall comfort was assessed and reported by the participant on a questionnaire as a single, retrospective evaluation of 2 weeks of wear. Overall comfort was measured on a 10-point scale, with 1 being poor and 10 being excellent.

Time frame: 2 weeks

Population: Analysis conducted per protocol, with exclusions due to reasons such as protocol deviations as determined by masked review; discontinuations; and/or missing responses.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Lotrafilcon BOverall Comfort8.6 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.4
Primary

Visual Clarity

Visual clarity was assessed and reported by the participant on a questionnaire as a single, retrospective evaluation of 2 weeks of wear. Visual clarity was measured on a 10-point scale, with 1 being poor and 10 being excellent.

Time frame: 2 weeks

Population: Analysis conducted per protocol, with exclusions due to reasons such as protocol deviations as determined by masked review; discontinuations; and/or missing responses.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Lotrafilcon BVisual Clarity8.4 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.5
Primary

Visual Clarity

Visual clarity was assessed and reported by the participant on a questionnaire as a single, retrospective evaluation of 4 weeks of wear. Visual clarity was measured on a 10-point scale, with 1 being poor and 10 being excellent.

Time frame: 4 weeks

Population: Analysis conducted per protocol, with exclusions due to reasons such as protocol deviations as determined by masked review; discontinuations; and/or missing responses.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Lotrafilcon BVisual Clarity8.2 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.5

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026