Skip to content

Efficacy of Luteinizing Hormone (LH) Activity in Low Responder Patients With Transdermal Testosterone

Efficacy of LH Activity in Low Responder Patients With Transdermal Testosterone: a Randomised Controlled Study.

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01291212
Enrollment
104
Registered
2011-02-08
Start date
2011-01-31
Completion date
2011-09-30
Last updated
2011-02-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Other Complications Associated With Artificial Fertilization

Keywords

In Vitro Fertilization, Testosterone, Ovarian Stimulation, Luteinizing Hormone

Brief summary

The investigators have previously demonstrated the utility of transdermal testosterone in in vitro fertilization (IVF) low responder patients. Now, the investigators want to evaluate the efficacy of luteinizing hormone (LH) activity added to recombinant follicular stimulating hormone (FSHr) during ovarian stimulation in these patients.

Detailed description

Studies in macaques have indicated that androgens have some synergistic effects with follicular stimulating hormone (FSH) on folliculogenesis. Our previous clinical studies demonstrated the usefulness of pretreatment with transdermal testosterone in low-responder IVF patients. There is controversy on the usefulness of recombinant luteinizing hormone (LHr) added to FSHr in ovarian stimulation of low responder patients. Thus, our present study has been designed to compare ovarian stimulation with FSHr alone versus LHr added to FSHr when transdermal testosterone pretreatment is used.

Interventions

DRUGTestosterone and FSHr-LHr

75U of LHr added to FSHr ovarian stimulation in IVF, when testosterone was used to improve the ovarian response

DRUGtestosterone and FSHr alone

FSHr alone used in ovarian stimulation in IVF, when testosterone was used to improve the ovarian response

Sponsors

Hospital Clinic of Barcelona
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 41 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Low responder patients: patients with previously canceled cycle or recovery of 3 or less oocytes

Exclusion criteria

* FSH \> 12 * Previous ovarian surgery

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
ovarian responsewithin 2 weeks after begining ovarian stimulationnumber of oocytes obtained per ovarian stimulation cycle

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
clinical pregnancy ratewithin 5 weeks (plus or minus 1 week) after embryo transferThe number of clinical pregnancies expressed per embryo transfer cycles. Clinical pregnancy: a pregnancy diagnosed by ultrasonographic visualization of one or more gestational sacs or definitive clinical signs of pregnancy. It includes ectopic pregnancy. Multiple gestational sacs are counted as one clinical pregnancy.
Implantation ratewithin 5 weeks (plus/minus 1 week) after embryo transferThe number of gestational sacs (observed by ultrasound examination) divided by the number of embryos transferred.
Live birth ratewithin 9 months (plus/minus 1 month) after embryo transferThe number of deliveries that resulted in at least one live born baby expressed per 100 embryo transfer cycles.

Countries

Spain

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026