Skip to content

Open-Label Extension Study to Evaluate the Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Reslizumab (3.0 mg/kg) as Treatment for Patients (12 Through 75 Years of Age) With Eosinophilic Asthma

An Open-Label Extension Study to Evaluate the Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Reslizumab (3.0 mg/kg) as Treatment for Patients With Eosinophilic Asthma Who Completed a Prior Teva-Sponsored Study in Eosinophilic Asthma

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01290887
Enrollment
1052
Registered
2011-02-07
Start date
2011-06-30
Completion date
2015-01-31
Last updated
2016-06-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Eosinophilic Asthma

Brief summary

The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the long-term safety of reslizumab at a dosage of 3.0 mg/kg every 4 weeks for approximately 24 months in pediatric and adult patients with eosinophilic asthma as assessed by adverse events, physical examination findings, vital sign measurements, and concomitant medication usage throughout the study (every 4 weeks), clinical laboratory test results, and measurement of antidrug antibodies.

Detailed description

Study patients deemed eligible based on activities from the preceding Teva sponsored double blind study of reslizumab in eosinophilic asthma. Specifically, as per inclusion criterion c, patients must have either completed treatment in a previous Teva-sponsored study or have received at least 2 doses of study drug treatment in a pulmonary function study. Eligible patients could enroll in this study only after completion of the end of treatment visit in a Teva sponsored, randomized, placebo controlled, double blind study of reslizumab in eosinophilic asthma, which served as the screening/baseline visit for participation in this open label extension study. The use of systemic corticosteroids for asthma in any of the previous Teva sponsored double blind studies of reslizumab did not exclude patients from this study. The previous Teva studies were C38072/3081 (NCT01270464), C38072/3082 (NCT01287039), and C38072/3083 (NCT01285323).

Interventions

DRUGReslizumab

Reslizumab (3.0 mg/kg) administered intravenously by infusion every 28 days (±7 days), for approximately 24 months

Sponsors

Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
12 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Written informed consent is obtained. * Patient must have completed treatment in a previous Cephalon-sponsored double-blind asthma exacerbation study or received at least 2 doses of study drug treatment in a pulmonary function study. * The patient must be willing and able to comply with study restrictions and to remain at the clinic for the required duration during the study period, and willing to return to the clinic for the follow-up evaluation as specified in this protocol. * other criteria may apply; please contact the investigator for more information.

Exclusion criteria

* The patient has a clinically meaningful comorbidity that would interfere with the study schedule or procedures, or compromise the patient's safety. * The patient has another confounding underlying lung disorder (eg, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, pulmonary fibrosis, or lung cancer). * The patient is a current smoker. * The patient is expected to be poorly compliant with study drug administration, study procedures, or visits. * The patient has any aggravating factors that are inadequately controlled (e.g., gastroesophageal reflux disease \[GERD\]). * Female patients who are pregnant, or nursing, or, if of childbearing potential and not using a medically accepted, effective method of birth control (eg, spermicide, abstinence, intrauterine device \[IUD\], or steroidal contraceptive \[oral, transdermal, implanted, and injected\] in conjunction with a barrier method) are excluded from this study. * The patient has a current infection or disease that may preclude assessment of asthma. * other criteria may apply; please contact the investigator for more information.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse EventsDay 1 (post-dose) to Week 65. The endpoint for adverse events was the last postbaseline observation, which included the 90 day follow-up visit.An adverse event was defined in the protocol as any untoward medical occurrence that develops or worsens in severity during the conduct of a clinical study and does not necessarily have a causal relationship to the study drug. Severity was rated by the investigator on a scale of mild, moderate and severe, with severe= an inability to carry out usual activities. Relation of AE to treatment was determined by the investigator. Serious AEs include death, a life-threatening adverse event, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, persistent or significant disability or incapacity, a congenital anomaly or birth defect, OR an important medical event that jeopardized the patient and required medical intervention to prevent the previously listed serious outcomes.
Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab ValuesWeeks 4, 8, 24 and 48Data represents participants with potentially clinically significant (PCS) abnormal serum chemistry, hematology, and urinalysis values on any of the during treatment lab analyses. Significance criteria: * Blood urea nitrogen: \>=10.71 mmol/L * Creatinine: \>=177 μmol/L * Uric acid: M\>=625, F\>=506 μmol/L * Aspartate aminotransferase: \>=3\*upper limit of normal (ULN). Normal range is 10-43 U/L * Alanine aminotransferase: \>=3\*ULN. Normal range is 10-40 U/L * GGT = gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase: \>= 3\*upper limit of normal. Normal range is 5-49 U/L. * Total bilirubin: \>=34.2 μmol/L * White blood cells- low: \<=3.0\*10\^9/L * White blood cells-high: \>=20\*10\^9/L * Hemoglobin: M\<=115, F\<=95 g/dL * Hematocrit: M\<0.37, F\<0.32 L/L * Platelets: \>=700\*10\^9/L * Absolute neutrophil count: \<=1.0\*10\^9/L * Eosinophils: \>=10 * Urinalysis: ketones, blood, glucose, and total protein: \>=2 unit increase from baseline
Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs ValuesWeek 4 to Week 65Data represents participants with PCS vital sign values during any of the during treatment visits or the follow-up visit. Significance criteria * Sitting heart rate-high: \>100 and increase of \>= 30 beats/min (all ages) * Sitting heart rate-low: \<50 and decrease of \>=30 beats/min * Sitting systolic blood pressure (BP)-high: \>130 and increase of \>=30 mmHg (ages 12-17) * Systolic BP-low: \<90 and decrease of \>=30 mmHg (ages \>=18) * Systolic BP-high: \>160 and increase of \>=30 mmHg (ages \>=18) * Sitting diastolic BP-low: \<55 and decrease of \>=12 mmHg (ages 12-17) * Diastolic BP-high: \>85 and increase of \>=12 mmHg (ages 12-17) * Diastolic BP-low: \<50 and decrease of \>=12 mmHg (ages \>=18) * Diastolic BP-high: \>100 and increase of \>=12 mmHg (ages \>=18) * Respiration rate: \>20 and increase of \>=10 breaths/minute (ages 12-17) * Respiration rate: \>24 and increase of \>=10 breaths/minute (ages \>=18) * Body temperature-low: \<96.5° Fahrenheit (all ages) * Body temp-high: \>100.5° F (all ages)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Forced Expiratory Flow at 25% to 75% Forced Vital Capacity (FEF 25%-75%) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, end of study and endpointThe FEF 25%-75% is the force expiratory flow at 25% to 75% of the Forced Vital Capacity (FVC), measured in liters/second .
Average Daily Use of Short-Acting Beta-Agonist (SABA)Therapy at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, end of study and endpointSABA are used for quick relief of asthma symptoms. To measure SABA use, at each clinical visit participants were asked to recall their usage of SABA therapy within the last 3 days of the scheduled visit. If usage was confirmed, the number of puffs used was recorded. For the purpose of summaries, an average daily usage was evaluated by dividing the total number of puffs recorded over 3 days by 3. .
Asthma Symptom Utility Index (ASUI) Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, end of study and endpointThe ASUI is an 11-item instrument designed to assess the frequency and severity of asthma symptoms and side effects, weighted by patient preferences (Revicki et al 1998). ASUI is a utility score that ranges from 0 to 1, with higher values indicating better asthma control. .
Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, end of study and endpointFEV1 is a standard measurement of air movement in the lungs of patients with asthma obtained from pulmonary function tests. It is the volume of air expired in the first second of a forced expiration using a spirometer.
Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) Total Score at Weeks 24, 48, 72, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeeks 24, 48, 72, 96, End of Study and EndpointThe AQLQ is a 32-item instrument administered as a self-assessment (Juniper et al 1992). The questionnaire is divided into 4 domains: activity limitation, symptoms, emotional function, and environmental stimuli. Patients were asked to recall their experiences during the last 2 weeks and to respond to each question on a 7-point scale (1=severe impairment, 7=no impairment). The overall AQLQ score is the mean of all 32 responses. Five of the activity questions were patient-specific, which means that each patient identified and scored 5 activities in which the patient was limited by asthma; these 5 activities were identified at the first visit and retained for all subsequent follow-up visits.
Participants With a Positive Anti-Reslizumab Antibody Status at Baseline, Weeks 24, 48, 72, 96, End of Study, Endpoint and OverallBaseline, Weeks 24, 48, 72, 96, End of Study, Endpoint and OverallBlood samples were collected for the determination of anti-drug antibody (ADAs) before study drug infusion at baseline and every 24 weeks until end of treatment visit or early withdrawal. Serum samples were analyzed by Teva (Teva Biopharmaceuticals USA, Rockville, Maryland, USA) using a validated homogeneous solution based bridging enzyme linked immune sorbent assay (Mikulsis et al 2011, Qui et al 2010). The analysis of anti-reslizumab antibody in patient serum consists of 3 tiers of assays for screening, confirmation, and titer analysis. If a participant had a treatment-emergent ADA response (ie, ADA positive at any of the postdose time points but negative at the predose time point) or if there was a treatment-boosted ADA response (defined as a greater than 4-fold increase from a positive baseline ADA response (Shankar et at 2014), the participant was classified as overall ADA positive. Predose samples for the reslizumab-experienced participants came from the previous studies.
Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, end of study and endpointThe ACQ is a 7-item instrument that measures asthma control (Juniper et al 1999). Six questions are self-assessments; the seventh item, completed by a member of the study staff, is the result of the patient's FEV1 measurement. Each item has 7 possible answers on a scale of 0 to 6, and the total score is the mean of all responses (the total scale is therefore 0-6). A higher score is an indication of poorer asthma control.
Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (% Predicted FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, end of study and endpointThe percent predicted FEV1 is the ratio of the volume of air expired in the first second of a forced expiration to the patient's predicted FEV based on a similar population without asthma. Percent predicted lung function values were transcribed directly from the lung function report to the CRF, without any calculation by Teva.
Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, end of study and endpointThe FVC is the volume of air that can be forcibly blown out after full inspiration, measured in liters. .

Countries

Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Chile, Colombia, Czechia, Denmark, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Israel, Malaysia, Mexico, Netherlands, New Zealand, Peru, Philippines, Poland, Romania, Russia, Slovakia, South Africa, South Korea, Sweden, Taiwan, Thailand, Ukraine, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

A total of 1052 patients with eosinophilic asthma at 201 centers in 30 countries were enrolled in this study.

Pre-assignment details

Four hundred-eighty (46%) patients received reslizumab for the first time in Study 3085, having previously received placebo in Studies 3081, 3082, or 3083.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation
The subpopulation of particpants who were treated with placebo in the previous double-blind studies. These participants were treated with resllizumab 3.0 mg/kg intravenously once every 4 weeks ( +-7 days) for up to 24 months in this study.
481
Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation
The subpopulation of particpants who were treated with reslizumab at a variety of dosages in the previous double-blind studies. These participants were treated with resllizumab 3.0 mg/kg intravenously once every 4 weeks ( +-7 days) for up to 24 months in this study.
571
Total1,052

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event611
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy45
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up44
Overall StudyNon-compliance to study medications10
Overall StudyNon-compliance to study procedures01
Overall StudyOther36
Overall StudyProtocol Violation21
Overall StudySponsor closure of study420476
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject2632

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPrevious Placebo-Treated SubpopulationTotalPrevious Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation
Age, Continuous47.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.53
47.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.02
47.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.58
Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ)1.832 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.0912
1.624 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.0527
1.450 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.987
Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ)5.170 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.216
5.347 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.1875
5.496 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.1431
Asthma Symptom Utility Index (ASUI)0.803 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.191
0.832 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.1728
0.861 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.1479
Blood Eosinophil Count0.528 10^9 blood eosinophil/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.3792
0.284 10^9 blood eosinophil/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.3577
0.078 10^9 blood eosinophil/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.148
Body Mass Index27.6 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.42
27.7 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.77
27.7 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.04
Daily average number of puffs in past 3 days2.130 puffs/day
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.4996
1.827 puffs/day
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.4604
1.568 puffs/day
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.3982
Forced Expiratory Flow at 25% to 75% Forced Vital Capacity (FEF 25%-75%)1.467 liters/second
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.889
1.558 liters/second
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.9009
1.634 liters/second
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.9045
Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1)2.096 liters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.7856
2.199 liters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.8108
2.285 liters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.8222
Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)3.163 liters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.0357
3.273 liters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.0632
3.366 liters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.0779
Height165.3 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.03
165.7 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.99
166.0 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.96
% Predicted Expiratory Volume In 1 Second70.739 percentage of predicted FEV1
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.756
73.115 percentage of predicted FEV1
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.9664
75.116 percentage of predicted FEV1
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.9404
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaskan Native
4 participants10 participants6 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
39 participants87 participants48 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black
22 participants44 participants22 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic or Latino
83 participants201 participants118 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Non-Hispanic and non-Latino
208 participants480 participants272 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Non-Hispanic or Latino
187 participants365 participants178 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
44 participants101 participants57 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Pacific Islander
1 participants2 participants1 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Unknown
3 participants6 participants3 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
371 participants808 participants437 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
314 Participants646 Participants332 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
167 Participants406 Participants239 Participants
Used Beta Agonist in Past 3 Days
No
180 participants454 participants274 participants
Used Beta Agonist in Past 3 Days
Yes
300 participants597 participants297 participants
Weight75.4 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.67
76.0 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.32
76.5 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.85

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
519 / 1,051
serious
Total, serious adverse events
78 / 1,051

Outcome results

Primary

Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events

An adverse event was defined in the protocol as any untoward medical occurrence that develops or worsens in severity during the conduct of a clinical study and does not necessarily have a causal relationship to the study drug. Severity was rated by the investigator on a scale of mild, moderate and severe, with severe= an inability to carry out usual activities. Relation of AE to treatment was determined by the investigator. Serious AEs include death, a life-threatening adverse event, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, persistent or significant disability or incapacity, a congenital anomaly or birth defect, OR an important medical event that jeopardized the patient and required medical intervention to prevent the previously listed serious outcomes.

Time frame: Day 1 (post-dose) to Week 65. The endpoint for adverse events was the last postbaseline observation, which included the 90 day follow-up visit.

Population: Safety analysis set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse EventsTreatment-related AE49 participants
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse EventsAt least 1 AE359 participants
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse EventsAE causing patient discontinuation6 participants
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse EventsAE up to follow-up period344 participants
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse EventsSevere AE31 participants
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse EventsSerious AE33 participants
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse EventsAE during follow-up period78 participants
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse EventsDeath1 participants
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse EventsSevere AE47 participants
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse EventsDeath2 participants
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse EventsAt least 1 AE385 participants
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse EventsAE up to follow-up period367 participants
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse EventsAE during follow-up period82 participants
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse EventsTreatment-related AE41 participants
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse EventsAE causing patient discontinuation12 participants
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse EventsSerious AE45 participants
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse EventsAE during follow-up period160 participants
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse EventsAt least 1 AE744 participants
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse EventsSevere AE78 participants
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse EventsTreatment-related AE90 participants
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse EventsAE causing patient discontinuation18 participants
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse EventsSerious AE78 participants
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse EventsDeath3 participants
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse EventsAE up to follow-up period711 participants
Primary

Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab Values

Data represents participants with potentially clinically significant (PCS) abnormal serum chemistry, hematology, and urinalysis values on any of the during treatment lab analyses. Significance criteria: * Blood urea nitrogen: \>=10.71 mmol/L * Creatinine: \>=177 μmol/L * Uric acid: M\>=625, F\>=506 μmol/L * Aspartate aminotransferase: \>=3\*upper limit of normal (ULN). Normal range is 10-43 U/L * Alanine aminotransferase: \>=3\*ULN. Normal range is 10-40 U/L * GGT = gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase: \>= 3\*upper limit of normal. Normal range is 5-49 U/L. * Total bilirubin: \>=34.2 μmol/L * White blood cells- low: \<=3.0\*10\^9/L * White blood cells-high: \>=20\*10\^9/L * Hemoglobin: M\<=115, F\<=95 g/dL * Hematocrit: M\<0.37, F\<0.32 L/L * Platelets: \>=700\*10\^9/L * Absolute neutrophil count: \<=1.0\*10\^9/L * Eosinophils: \>=10 * Urinalysis: ketones, blood, glucose, and total protein: \>=2 unit increase from baseline

Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 24 and 48

Population: Safety analysis set, including participants who contributed to the analysis

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab ValuesAlanine aminotransferase7 participants
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab ValuesCreatinine3 participants
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab ValuesUric acid8 participants
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab ValuesAspartate aminotransferase6 participants
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab ValuesBlood urea nitrogen13 participants
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab ValuesGGT24 participants
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab ValuesTotal bilirubin3 participants
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab ValuesWhite blood cells- low10 participants
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab ValuesWhite blood cells- high2 participants
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab ValuesHemoglobin10 participants
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab ValuesHematocrit13 participants
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab ValuesPlatelets1 participants
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab ValuesAbsolute neutrophil count7 participants
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab ValuesEosinophils24 participants
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab ValuesKetones in urine15 participants
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab ValuesBlood (hemaglobin) in urine52 participants
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab ValuesGlucose in urine22 participants
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab ValuesTotal protein in urine71 participants
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab ValuesTotal protein in urine85 participants
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab ValuesBlood urea nitrogen10 participants
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab ValuesHemoglobin9 participants
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab ValuesAbsolute neutrophil count7 participants
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab ValuesCreatinine2 participants
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab ValuesKetones in urine9 participants
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab ValuesBlood (hemaglobin) in urine55 participants
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab ValuesUric acid5 participants
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab ValuesHematocrit13 participants
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab ValuesGlucose in urine32 participants
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab ValuesAspartate aminotransferase5 participants
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab ValuesWhite blood cells- high1 participants
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab ValuesEosinophils27 participants
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab ValuesAlanine aminotransferase7 participants
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab ValuesWhite blood cells- low8 participants
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab ValuesPlatelets1 participants
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab ValuesGGT15 participants
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab ValuesTotal bilirubin3 participants
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab ValuesGGT39 participants
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab ValuesTotal bilirubin6 participants
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab ValuesWhite blood cells- low18 participants
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab ValuesKetones in urine24 participants
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab ValuesWhite blood cells- high3 participants
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab ValuesTotal protein in urine156 participants
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab ValuesHemoglobin19 participants
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab ValuesHematocrit26 participants
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab ValuesBlood (hemaglobin) in urine107 participants
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab ValuesPlatelets2 participants
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab ValuesBlood urea nitrogen23 participants
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab ValuesCreatinine5 participants
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab ValuesAbsolute neutrophil count14 participants
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab ValuesUric acid13 participants
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab ValuesAspartate aminotransferase11 participants
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab ValuesAlanine aminotransferase14 participants
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab ValuesEosinophils51 participants
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab ValuesGlucose in urine54 participants
Primary

Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs Values

Data represents participants with PCS vital sign values during any of the during treatment visits or the follow-up visit. Significance criteria * Sitting heart rate-high: \>100 and increase of \>= 30 beats/min (all ages) * Sitting heart rate-low: \<50 and decrease of \>=30 beats/min * Sitting systolic blood pressure (BP)-high: \>130 and increase of \>=30 mmHg (ages 12-17) * Systolic BP-low: \<90 and decrease of \>=30 mmHg (ages \>=18) * Systolic BP-high: \>160 and increase of \>=30 mmHg (ages \>=18) * Sitting diastolic BP-low: \<55 and decrease of \>=12 mmHg (ages 12-17) * Diastolic BP-high: \>85 and increase of \>=12 mmHg (ages 12-17) * Diastolic BP-low: \<50 and decrease of \>=12 mmHg (ages \>=18) * Diastolic BP-high: \>100 and increase of \>=12 mmHg (ages \>=18) * Respiration rate: \>20 and increase of \>=10 breaths/minute (ages 12-17) * Respiration rate: \>24 and increase of \>=10 breaths/minute (ages \>=18) * Body temperature-low: \<96.5° Fahrenheit (all ages) * Body temp-high: \>100.5° F (all ages)

Time frame: Week 4 to Week 65

Population: Safety analysis set, including participants who contributed to the analysis

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs ValuesRespiration rate - high (ages 12-17)0 participants
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs ValuesRespiration rate - high (ages >=18)6 participants
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs ValuesHeart rate - low (ages >=18)2 participants
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs ValuesBody temperature - low (ages 12-17)3 participants
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs ValuesSystolic BP - low (ages >=18)1 participants
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs ValuesBody temperature - high (ages 12-17)0 participants
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs ValuesBody temperature - low (ages >=18)102 participants
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs ValuesBody temperature - high (ages >=18)3 participants
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs ValuesSystolic BP - high (ages >=18)8 participants
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs ValuesDiastolic BP - low (ages 12-17)1 participants
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs ValuesHeart rate - high (ages >=18)8 participants
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs ValuesDiastolic BP - high (ages 12-17)2 participants
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs ValuesDiastolic BP - low (ages >=18)2 participants
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs ValuesHeart rate - high (ages 12-17)1 participants
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs ValuesDiastolic - high (ages >=18)13 participants
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs ValuesSystolic BP - high (ages 12-17)0 participants
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs ValuesHeart rate - high (ages >=18)8 participants
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs ValuesSystolic BP - high (ages 12-17)1 participants
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs ValuesSystolic BP - high (ages >=18)8 participants
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs ValuesRespiration rate - high (ages >=18)2 participants
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs ValuesHeart rate - high (ages 12-17)2 participants
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs ValuesRespiration rate - high (ages 12-17)1 participants
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs ValuesBody temperature - low (ages 12-17)3 participants
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs ValuesDiastolic BP - low (ages 12-17)1 participants
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs ValuesDiastolic BP - low (ages >=18)4 participants
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs ValuesBody temperature - high (ages 12-17)1 participants
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs ValuesSystolic BP - low (ages >=18)0 participants
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs ValuesDiastolic - high (ages >=18)12 participants
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs ValuesBody temperature - low (ages >=18)121 participants
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs ValuesHeart rate - low (ages >=18)1 participants
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs ValuesDiastolic BP - high (ages 12-17)1 participants
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs ValuesBody temperature - high (ages >=18)1 participants
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs ValuesDiastolic - high (ages >=18)25 participants
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs ValuesHeart rate - high (ages 12-17)3 participants
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs ValuesHeart rate - low (ages >=18)3 participants
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs ValuesHeart rate - high (ages >=18)16 participants
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs ValuesSystolic BP - high (ages 12-17)1 participants
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs ValuesSystolic BP - low (ages >=18)1 participants
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs ValuesSystolic BP - high (ages >=18)16 participants
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs ValuesDiastolic BP - low (ages 12-17)2 participants
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs ValuesDiastolic BP - high (ages 12-17)3 participants
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs ValuesDiastolic BP - low (ages >=18)6 participants
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs ValuesBody temperature - high (ages >=18)4 participants
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs ValuesRespiration rate - high (ages 12-17)1 participants
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs ValuesRespiration rate - high (ages >=18)8 participants
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs ValuesBody temperature - low (ages 12-17)6 participants
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs ValuesBody temperature - high (ages 12-17)1 participants
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs ValuesBody temperature - low (ages >=18)223 participants
Secondary

Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint

The ACQ is a 7-item instrument that measures asthma control (Juniper et al 1999). Six questions are self-assessments; the seventh item, completed by a member of the study staff, is the result of the patient's FEV1 measurement. Each item has 7 possible answers on a scale of 0 to 6, and the total score is the mean of all responses (the total scale is therefore 0-6). A higher score is an indication of poorer asthma control.

Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, end of study and endpoint

Population: Safety analysis set of participants with assessments at stated timeframes

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationAsthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 96 (n=23, 46, 69)1.323 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9862
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationAsthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 4 (n=456, 552, 1008)1.546 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.0154
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationAsthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 8 (n=437, 517, 954)1.446 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9805
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationAsthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 12 (n=426, 500, 926)1.459 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.0004
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationAsthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 16 (n=416, 487, 903)1.444 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.0016
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationAsthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 24 (n=386, 458, 844)1.436 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.0135
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationAsthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 36 (n=291, 353, 644)1.425 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.0189
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationAsthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 48 (n=198, 250, 448)1.408 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9699
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationAsthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 60 (n=100, 143, 243)1.284 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9739
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationAsthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 72 (n=56, 105, 161)1.283 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9176
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationAsthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 84 (n=45, 87, 132)1.143 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.902
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationAsthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointEnd of study (n=28, 54, 82)1.061 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7653
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationAsthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointEndpoint (n=478, 569, 1047)1.450 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9901
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationAsthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 96 (n=23, 46, 69)1.391 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9559
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationAsthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 24 (n=386, 458, 844)1.299 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9497
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationAsthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 36 (n=291, 353, 644)1.282 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9331
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationAsthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointEndpoint (n=478, 569, 1047)1.389 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9637
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationAsthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 48 (n=198, 250, 448)1.297 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.981
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationAsthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointEnd of study (n=28, 54, 82)1.437 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.975
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationAsthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 60 (n=100, 143, 243)1.297 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9432
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationAsthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 72 (n=56, 105, 161)1.231 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8295
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationAsthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 4 (n=456, 552, 1008)1.429 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9573
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationAsthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 8 (n=437, 517, 954)1.392 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9729
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationAsthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 84 (n=45, 87, 132)1.209 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9186
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationAsthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 12 (n=426, 500, 926)1.360 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.932
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationAsthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 16 (n=416, 487, 903)1.305 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9299
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgAsthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 84 (n=45, 87, 132)1.186 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.91
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgAsthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 72 (n=56, 105, 161)1.249 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8587
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgAsthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 24 (n=386, 458, 844)1.362 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9812
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgAsthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 96 (n=23, 46, 69)1.369 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9594
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgAsthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 16 (n=416, 487, 903)1.369 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9655
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgAsthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 36 (n=291, 353, 644)1.347 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9746
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgAsthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 4 (n=456, 552, 1008)1.482 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9852
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgAsthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointEndpoint (n=478, 569, 1047)1.417 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9759
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgAsthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 48 (n=198, 250, 448)1.346 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9766
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgAsthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 12 (n=426, 500, 926)1.405 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9648
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgAsthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 8 (n=437, 517, 954)1.417 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9762
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgAsthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 60 (n=100, 143, 243)1.292 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.954
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgAsthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointEnd of study (n=28, 54, 82)1.308 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9216
Secondary

Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) Total Score at Weeks 24, 48, 72, 96, End of Study and Endpoint

The AQLQ is a 32-item instrument administered as a self-assessment (Juniper et al 1992). The questionnaire is divided into 4 domains: activity limitation, symptoms, emotional function, and environmental stimuli. Patients were asked to recall their experiences during the last 2 weeks and to respond to each question on a 7-point scale (1=severe impairment, 7=no impairment). The overall AQLQ score is the mean of all 32 responses. Five of the activity questions were patient-specific, which means that each patient identified and scored 5 activities in which the patient was limited by asthma; these 5 activities were identified at the first visit and retained for all subsequent follow-up visits.

Time frame: Weeks 24, 48, 72, 96, End of Study and Endpoint

Population: Safety analysis set of participants with assessments at stated timeframes

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationAsthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) Total Score at Weeks 24, 48, 72, 96, End of Study and EndpointEndpoint (n=472, 558, 1030)5.535 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.169
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationAsthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) Total Score at Weeks 24, 48, 72, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 72 (n=56, 106, 162)5.808 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.0002
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationAsthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) Total Score at Weeks 24, 48, 72, 96, End of Study and EndpointEnd of study (n=28, 55, 83)5.956 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9431
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationAsthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) Total Score at Weeks 24, 48, 72, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 24 (n=382, 452, 834)5.551 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1558
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationAsthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) Total Score at Weeks 24, 48, 72, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 96 (n=23, 46, 69)5.585 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1422
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationAsthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) Total Score at Weeks 24, 48, 72, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 48 (n=193, 249, 442)5.602 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.118
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationAsthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) Total Score at Weeks 24, 48, 72, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 96 (n=23, 46, 69)5.809 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.134
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationAsthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) Total Score at Weeks 24, 48, 72, 96, End of Study and EndpointEnd of study (n=28, 55, 83)5.765 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.2361
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationAsthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) Total Score at Weeks 24, 48, 72, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 48 (n=193, 249, 442)5.725 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.0818
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationAsthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) Total Score at Weeks 24, 48, 72, 96, End of Study and EndpointEndpoint (n=472, 558, 1030)5.631 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1334
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationAsthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) Total Score at Weeks 24, 48, 72, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 24 (n=382, 452, 834)5.691 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.0651
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationAsthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) Total Score at Weeks 24, 48, 72, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 72 (n=56, 106, 162)5.809 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.0235
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgAsthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) Total Score at Weeks 24, 48, 72, 96, End of Study and EndpointEndpoint (n=472, 558, 1030)5.587 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1503
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgAsthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) Total Score at Weeks 24, 48, 72, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 24 (n=382, 452, 834)5.627 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1091
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgAsthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) Total Score at Weeks 24, 48, 72, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 48 (n=193, 249, 442)5.672 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.0982
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgAsthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) Total Score at Weeks 24, 48, 72, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 72 (n=56, 106, 162)5.809 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.0124
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgAsthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) Total Score at Weeks 24, 48, 72, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 96 (n=23, 46, 69)5.734 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1333
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgAsthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) Total Score at Weeks 24, 48, 72, 96, End of Study and EndpointEnd of study (n=28, 55, 83)5.829 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1434
Secondary

Asthma Symptom Utility Index (ASUI) Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint

The ASUI is an 11-item instrument designed to assess the frequency and severity of asthma symptoms and side effects, weighted by patient preferences (Revicki et al 1998). ASUI is a utility score that ranges from 0 to 1, with higher values indicating better asthma control. .

Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, end of study and endpoint

Population: Safety analysis set of participants with assessments at stated timeframes

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationAsthma Symptom Utility Index (ASUI) Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointEnd of study (n=28, 55, 83)0.877 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.0979
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationAsthma Symptom Utility Index (ASUI) Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 72 (n=56, 105, 161)0.876 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.1346
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationAsthma Symptom Utility Index (ASUI) Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 36 (n=291, 354, 645)0.844 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.1821
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationAsthma Symptom Utility Index (ASUI) Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 12 (n=426, 500, 926)0.839 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.1752
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationAsthma Symptom Utility Index (ASUI) Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 60 (n=100, 146, 246)0.869 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.1573
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationAsthma Symptom Utility Index (ASUI) Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 48 (n=198, 251, 449)0.851 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.1699
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationAsthma Symptom Utility Index (ASUI) Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 4 (n=456, 552, 1008)0.831 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.1829
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationAsthma Symptom Utility Index (ASUI) Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 8 (n=436, 514, 950)0.843 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.1663
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationAsthma Symptom Utility Index (ASUI) Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 96 (n=23, 46, 69)0.822 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.2036
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationAsthma Symptom Utility Index (ASUI) Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 16 (n=416, 486, 902)0.845 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.169
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationAsthma Symptom Utility Index (ASUI) Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointEndpoint (n=478, 569, 1047)0.843 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.1679
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationAsthma Symptom Utility Index (ASUI) Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 84 (n=45, 87, 132)0.884 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.146
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationAsthma Symptom Utility Index (ASUI) Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 24 (n=386, 458, 844)0.844 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.172
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationAsthma Symptom Utility Index (ASUI) Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 48 (n=198, 251, 449)0.856 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.1705
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationAsthma Symptom Utility Index (ASUI) Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 4 (n=456, 552, 1008)0.844 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.1631
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationAsthma Symptom Utility Index (ASUI) Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 8 (n=436, 514, 950)0.851 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.1596
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationAsthma Symptom Utility Index (ASUI) Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 12 (n=426, 500, 926)0.854 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.1578
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationAsthma Symptom Utility Index (ASUI) Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 16 (n=416, 486, 902)0.856 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.1659
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationAsthma Symptom Utility Index (ASUI) Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 24 (n=386, 458, 844)0.859 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.1602
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationAsthma Symptom Utility Index (ASUI) Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 36 (n=291, 354, 645)0.867 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.1536
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationAsthma Symptom Utility Index (ASUI) Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 60 (n=100, 146, 246)0.865 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.1513
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationAsthma Symptom Utility Index (ASUI) Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 72 (n=56, 105, 161)0.858 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.1509
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationAsthma Symptom Utility Index (ASUI) Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 84 (n=45, 87, 132)0.868 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.1541
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationAsthma Symptom Utility Index (ASUI) Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 96 (n=23, 46, 69)0.836 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.1729
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationAsthma Symptom Utility Index (ASUI) Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointEnd of study (n=28, 55, 83)0.840 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.2053
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationAsthma Symptom Utility Index (ASUI) Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointEndpoint (n=478, 569, 1047)0.850 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.1661
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgAsthma Symptom Utility Index (ASUI) Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 72 (n=56, 105, 161)0.865 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.1453
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgAsthma Symptom Utility Index (ASUI) Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 16 (n=416, 486, 902)0.851 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.1673
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgAsthma Symptom Utility Index (ASUI) Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointEnd of study (n=28, 55, 83)0.853 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.1767
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgAsthma Symptom Utility Index (ASUI) Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 84 (n=45, 87, 132)0.873 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.151
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgAsthma Symptom Utility Index (ASUI) Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 12 (n=426, 500, 926)0.847 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.1661
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgAsthma Symptom Utility Index (ASUI) Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 4 (n=456, 552, 1008)0.838 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.1724
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgAsthma Symptom Utility Index (ASUI) Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 96 (n=23, 46, 69)0.832 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.1823
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgAsthma Symptom Utility Index (ASUI) Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 48 (n=198, 251, 449)0.854 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.1701
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgAsthma Symptom Utility Index (ASUI) Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 36 (n=291, 354, 645)0.857 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.1673
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgAsthma Symptom Utility Index (ASUI) Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 8 (n=436, 514, 950)0.847 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.1626
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgAsthma Symptom Utility Index (ASUI) Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 60 (n=100, 146, 246)0.866 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.1534
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgAsthma Symptom Utility Index (ASUI) Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 24 (n=386, 458, 844)0.852 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.1658
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgAsthma Symptom Utility Index (ASUI) Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointEndpoint (n=478, 569, 1047)0.847 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.1669
Secondary

Average Daily Use of Short-Acting Beta-Agonist (SABA)Therapy at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint

SABA are used for quick relief of asthma symptoms. To measure SABA use, at each clinical visit participants were asked to recall their usage of SABA therapy within the last 3 days of the scheduled visit. If usage was confirmed, the number of puffs used was recorded. For the purpose of summaries, an average daily usage was evaluated by dividing the total number of puffs recorded over 3 days by 3. .

Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, end of study and endpoint

Population: Safety analysis set of participants with assessments at stated timeframes

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationAverage Daily Use of Short-Acting Beta-Agonist (SABA)Therapy at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointEnd of study (n=16, 23, 39)2.1 # puffs/dayStandard Deviation 1.76
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationAverage Daily Use of Short-Acting Beta-Agonist (SABA)Therapy at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 72 (n=29, 47, 76)2.1 # puffs/dayStandard Deviation 2.19
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationAverage Daily Use of Short-Acting Beta-Agonist (SABA)Therapy at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 36 (n=160, 174, 334)2.4 # puffs/dayStandard Deviation 2.27
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationAverage Daily Use of Short-Acting Beta-Agonist (SABA)Therapy at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 12 (n=251, 278, 529)2.6 # puffs/dayStandard Deviation 2.07
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationAverage Daily Use of Short-Acting Beta-Agonist (SABA)Therapy at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 60 (n=50, 64, 114)2.1 # puffs/dayStandard Deviation 2.19
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationAverage Daily Use of Short-Acting Beta-Agonist (SABA)Therapy at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 48 (n=111, 121, 232)2.2 # puffs/dayStandard Deviation 2.28
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationAverage Daily Use of Short-Acting Beta-Agonist (SABA)Therapy at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 4 (n=276, 323, 599)2.5 # puffs/dayStandard Deviation 2.42
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationAverage Daily Use of Short-Acting Beta-Agonist (SABA)Therapy at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 8 (n=258, 302, 560)2.4 # puffs/dayStandard Deviation 2.28
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationAverage Daily Use of Short-Acting Beta-Agonist (SABA)Therapy at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 96 (n=14, 26, 40)1.8 # puffs/dayStandard Deviation 1.41
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationAverage Daily Use of Short-Acting Beta-Agonist (SABA)Therapy at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 16 (n=244, 261, 505)2.5 # puffs/dayStandard Deviation 2.3
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationAverage Daily Use of Short-Acting Beta-Agonist (SABA)Therapy at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointEndpoint (n=390, 453, 843)2.2 # puffs/dayStandard Deviation 2.2
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationAverage Daily Use of Short-Acting Beta-Agonist (SABA)Therapy at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 84 (n=19, 35, 54)2.0 # puffs/dayStandard Deviation 1.57
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationAverage Daily Use of Short-Acting Beta-Agonist (SABA)Therapy at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 24 (n=211, 243, 454)2.6 # puffs/dayStandard Deviation 2.55
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationAverage Daily Use of Short-Acting Beta-Agonist (SABA)Therapy at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 48 (n=111, 121, 232)2.4 # puffs/dayStandard Deviation 2.54
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationAverage Daily Use of Short-Acting Beta-Agonist (SABA)Therapy at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 4 (n=276, 323, 599)2.4 # puffs/dayStandard Deviation 2.45
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationAverage Daily Use of Short-Acting Beta-Agonist (SABA)Therapy at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 8 (n=258, 302, 560)2.4 # puffs/dayStandard Deviation 2.62
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationAverage Daily Use of Short-Acting Beta-Agonist (SABA)Therapy at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 12 (n=251, 278, 529)2.4 # puffs/dayStandard Deviation 2.5
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationAverage Daily Use of Short-Acting Beta-Agonist (SABA)Therapy at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 16 (n=244, 261, 505)2.2 # puffs/dayStandard Deviation 2.29
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationAverage Daily Use of Short-Acting Beta-Agonist (SABA)Therapy at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 24 (n=211, 243, 454)2.3 # puffs/dayStandard Deviation 2.46
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationAverage Daily Use of Short-Acting Beta-Agonist (SABA)Therapy at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 36 (n=160, 174, 334)2.3 # puffs/dayStandard Deviation 2.64
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationAverage Daily Use of Short-Acting Beta-Agonist (SABA)Therapy at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 60 (n=50, 64, 114)2.5 # puffs/dayStandard Deviation 3.3
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationAverage Daily Use of Short-Acting Beta-Agonist (SABA)Therapy at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 72 (n=29, 47, 76)1.8 # puffs/dayStandard Deviation 1.88
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationAverage Daily Use of Short-Acting Beta-Agonist (SABA)Therapy at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 84 (n=19, 35, 54)2.4 # puffs/dayStandard Deviation 2.38
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationAverage Daily Use of Short-Acting Beta-Agonist (SABA)Therapy at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 96 (n=14, 26, 40)1.7 # puffs/dayStandard Deviation 1.57
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationAverage Daily Use of Short-Acting Beta-Agonist (SABA)Therapy at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointEnd of study (n=16, 23, 39)2.7 # puffs/dayStandard Deviation 1.99
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationAverage Daily Use of Short-Acting Beta-Agonist (SABA)Therapy at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointEndpoint (n=390, 453, 843)2.2 # puffs/dayStandard Deviation 4.09
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgAverage Daily Use of Short-Acting Beta-Agonist (SABA)Therapy at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 72 (n=29, 47, 76)1.9 # puffs/dayStandard Deviation 1.99
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgAverage Daily Use of Short-Acting Beta-Agonist (SABA)Therapy at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 16 (n=244, 261, 505)2.4 # puffs/dayStandard Deviation 2.3
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgAverage Daily Use of Short-Acting Beta-Agonist (SABA)Therapy at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointEnd of study (n=16, 23, 39)2.4 # puffs/dayStandard Deviation 1.9
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgAverage Daily Use of Short-Acting Beta-Agonist (SABA)Therapy at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 84 (n=19, 35, 54)2.2 # puffs/dayStandard Deviation 2.12
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgAverage Daily Use of Short-Acting Beta-Agonist (SABA)Therapy at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 12 (n=251, 278, 529)2.5 # puffs/dayStandard Deviation 2.3
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgAverage Daily Use of Short-Acting Beta-Agonist (SABA)Therapy at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 4 (n=276, 323, 599)2.5 # puffs/dayStandard Deviation 2.43
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgAverage Daily Use of Short-Acting Beta-Agonist (SABA)Therapy at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 96 (n=14, 26, 40)1.8 # puffs/dayStandard Deviation 1.5
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgAverage Daily Use of Short-Acting Beta-Agonist (SABA)Therapy at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 48 (n=111, 121, 232)2.3 # puffs/dayStandard Deviation 2.42
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgAverage Daily Use of Short-Acting Beta-Agonist (SABA)Therapy at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 36 (n=160, 174, 334)2.3 # puffs/dayStandard Deviation 2.47
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgAverage Daily Use of Short-Acting Beta-Agonist (SABA)Therapy at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 8 (n=258, 302, 560)2.4 # puffs/dayStandard Deviation 2.46
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgAverage Daily Use of Short-Acting Beta-Agonist (SABA)Therapy at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 60 (n=50, 64, 114)2.3 # puffs/dayStandard Deviation 2.86
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgAverage Daily Use of Short-Acting Beta-Agonist (SABA)Therapy at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 24 (n=211, 243, 454)2.4 # puffs/dayStandard Deviation 2.51
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgAverage Daily Use of Short-Acting Beta-Agonist (SABA)Therapy at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointEndpoint (n=390, 453, 843)2.2 # puffs/dayStandard Deviation 3.35
Secondary

Forced Expiratory Flow at 25% to 75% Forced Vital Capacity (FEF 25%-75%) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint

The FEF 25%-75% is the force expiratory flow at 25% to 75% of the Forced Vital Capacity (FVC), measured in liters/second .

Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, end of study and endpoint

Population: Safety analysis set of participants with assessments at stated timeframes

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationForced Expiratory Flow at 25% to 75% Forced Vital Capacity (FEF 25%-75%) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointEnd of study (n=28, 54, 82)1.939 liters/secondStandard Deviation 1.1105
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationForced Expiratory Flow at 25% to 75% Forced Vital Capacity (FEF 25%-75%) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 72 (n=56, 105, 161)1.810 liters/secondStandard Deviation 1.0239
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationForced Expiratory Flow at 25% to 75% Forced Vital Capacity (FEF 25%-75%) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 36 (n=285, 349, 634)1.642 liters/secondStandard Deviation 1.1087
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationForced Expiratory Flow at 25% to 75% Forced Vital Capacity (FEF 25%-75%) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 12 (n=418, 494, 912)1.587 liters/secondStandard Deviation 0.9833
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationForced Expiratory Flow at 25% to 75% Forced Vital Capacity (FEF 25%-75%) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 60 (n=99, 143, 242)1.605 liters/secondStandard Deviation 1.0869
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationForced Expiratory Flow at 25% to 75% Forced Vital Capacity (FEF 25%-75%) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 48 (n=191, 249, 440)1.628 liters/secondStandard Deviation 1.0408
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationForced Expiratory Flow at 25% to 75% Forced Vital Capacity (FEF 25%-75%) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 4 (n=446, 545, 991)1.558 liters/secondStandard Deviation 0.9363
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationForced Expiratory Flow at 25% to 75% Forced Vital Capacity (FEF 25%-75%) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 8 (n=429, 513, 942)1.546 liters/secondStandard Deviation 0.9279
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationForced Expiratory Flow at 25% to 75% Forced Vital Capacity (FEF 25%-75%) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 96 (n=23, 46, 69)2.120 liters/secondStandard Deviation 1.0597
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationForced Expiratory Flow at 25% to 75% Forced Vital Capacity (FEF 25%-75%) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 16 (n=408, 483, 891)1.561 liters/secondStandard Deviation 0.9427
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationForced Expiratory Flow at 25% to 75% Forced Vital Capacity (FEF 25%-75%) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointEndpoint (n=468, 563, 1031)1.546 liters/secondStandard Deviation 0.9041
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationForced Expiratory Flow at 25% to 75% Forced Vital Capacity (FEF 25%-75%) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 84 (n=45, 88, 133)1.848 liters/secondStandard Deviation 0.9047
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationForced Expiratory Flow at 25% to 75% Forced Vital Capacity (FEF 25%-75%) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 24 (n=377, 453, 830)1.619 liters/secondStandard Deviation 0.9967
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationForced Expiratory Flow at 25% to 75% Forced Vital Capacity (FEF 25%-75%) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 48 (n=191, 249, 440)1.691 liters/secondStandard Deviation 0.945
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationForced Expiratory Flow at 25% to 75% Forced Vital Capacity (FEF 25%-75%) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 4 (n=446, 545, 991)1.614 liters/secondStandard Deviation 0.9055
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationForced Expiratory Flow at 25% to 75% Forced Vital Capacity (FEF 25%-75%) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 8 (n=429, 513, 942)1.618 liters/secondStandard Deviation 0.9255
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationForced Expiratory Flow at 25% to 75% Forced Vital Capacity (FEF 25%-75%) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 12 (n=418, 494, 912)1.624 liters/secondStandard Deviation 0.9367
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationForced Expiratory Flow at 25% to 75% Forced Vital Capacity (FEF 25%-75%) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 16 (n=408, 483, 891)1.620 liters/secondStandard Deviation 0.9068
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationForced Expiratory Flow at 25% to 75% Forced Vital Capacity (FEF 25%-75%) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 24 (n=377, 453, 830)1.637 liters/secondStandard Deviation 0.9227
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationForced Expiratory Flow at 25% to 75% Forced Vital Capacity (FEF 25%-75%) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 36 (n=285, 349, 634)1.650 liters/secondStandard Deviation 0.9193
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationForced Expiratory Flow at 25% to 75% Forced Vital Capacity (FEF 25%-75%) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 60 (n=99, 143, 242)1.791 liters/secondStandard Deviation 1.1508
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationForced Expiratory Flow at 25% to 75% Forced Vital Capacity (FEF 25%-75%) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 72 (n=56, 105, 161)1.766 liters/secondStandard Deviation 1.0341
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationForced Expiratory Flow at 25% to 75% Forced Vital Capacity (FEF 25%-75%) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 84 (n=45, 88, 133)1.892 liters/secondStandard Deviation 1.1499
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationForced Expiratory Flow at 25% to 75% Forced Vital Capacity (FEF 25%-75%) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 96 (n=23, 46, 69)1.942 liters/secondStandard Deviation 1.0453
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationForced Expiratory Flow at 25% to 75% Forced Vital Capacity (FEF 25%-75%) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointEnd of study (n=28, 54, 82)1.639 liters/secondStandard Deviation 0.9079
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationForced Expiratory Flow at 25% to 75% Forced Vital Capacity (FEF 25%-75%) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointEndpoint (n=468, 563, 1031)1.629 liters/secondStandard Deviation 0.93
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgForced Expiratory Flow at 25% to 75% Forced Vital Capacity (FEF 25%-75%) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 72 (n=56, 105, 161)1.781 liters/secondStandard Deviation 1.0276
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgForced Expiratory Flow at 25% to 75% Forced Vital Capacity (FEF 25%-75%) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 16 (n=408, 483, 891)1.593 liters/secondStandard Deviation 0.9234
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgForced Expiratory Flow at 25% to 75% Forced Vital Capacity (FEF 25%-75%) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointEnd of study (n=28, 54, 82)1.741 liters/secondStandard Deviation 0.9854
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgForced Expiratory Flow at 25% to 75% Forced Vital Capacity (FEF 25%-75%) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 84 (n=45, 88, 133)1.877 liters/secondStandard Deviation 1.07
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgForced Expiratory Flow at 25% to 75% Forced Vital Capacity (FEF 25%-75%) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 12 (n=418, 494, 912)1.607 liters/secondStandard Deviation 0.958
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgForced Expiratory Flow at 25% to 75% Forced Vital Capacity (FEF 25%-75%) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 4 (n=446, 545, 991)1.589 liters/secondStandard Deviation 0.9195
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgForced Expiratory Flow at 25% to 75% Forced Vital Capacity (FEF 25%-75%) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 96 (n=23, 46, 69)2.001 liters/secondStandard Deviation 1.0457
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgForced Expiratory Flow at 25% to 75% Forced Vital Capacity (FEF 25%-75%) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 48 (n=191, 249, 440)1.664 liters/secondStandard Deviation 0.9871
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgForced Expiratory Flow at 25% to 75% Forced Vital Capacity (FEF 25%-75%) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 36 (n=285, 349, 634)1.646 liters/secondStandard Deviation 1.008
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgForced Expiratory Flow at 25% to 75% Forced Vital Capacity (FEF 25%-75%) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 8 (n=429, 513, 942)1.585 liters/secondStandard Deviation 0.9268
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgForced Expiratory Flow at 25% to 75% Forced Vital Capacity (FEF 25%-75%) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 60 (n=99, 143, 242)1.715 liters/secondStandard Deviation 1.1265
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgForced Expiratory Flow at 25% to 75% Forced Vital Capacity (FEF 25%-75%) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 24 (n=377, 453, 830)1.629 liters/secondStandard Deviation 0.9565
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgForced Expiratory Flow at 25% to 75% Forced Vital Capacity (FEF 25%-75%) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointEndpoint (n=468, 563, 1031)1.592 liters/secondStandard Deviation 0.9188
Secondary

Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint

FEV1 is a standard measurement of air movement in the lungs of patients with asthma obtained from pulmonary function tests. It is the volume of air expired in the first second of a forced expiration using a spirometer.

Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, end of study and endpoint

Population: Safety analysis set of participants with assessments at stated timeframes

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationForced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointEnd of study (n=28, 54, 82)2.505 litersStandard Deviation 0.9386
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationForced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 72 (n=56, 105, 161)2.424 litersStandard Deviation 0.9093
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationForced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 36 (n=291, 354, 645)2.234 litersStandard Deviation 0.824
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationForced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 12 (n=426, 499, 925)2.171 litersStandard Deviation 0.769
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationForced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 60 (n=101, 143, 244)2.234 litersStandard Deviation 0.9214
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationForced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 48 (n=198, 250, 448)2.167 litersStandard Deviation 0.7905
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationForced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 4 (n=457, 552, 1009)2.155 litersStandard Deviation 0.7636
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationForced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 8 (n=437, 518, 955)2.162 litersStandard Deviation 0.7966
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationForced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 96 (n=23, 46, 69)2.748 litersStandard Deviation 0.8963
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationForced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 16 (n=418, 488, 906)2.169 litersStandard Deviation 0.7761
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationForced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointEndpoint (n=478, 569, 1047)2.174 litersStandard Deviation 0.7798
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationForced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 84 (n=45, 88, 133)2.496 litersStandard Deviation 0.8496
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationForced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 24 (n=386, 458, 844)2.188 litersStandard Deviation 0.7966
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationForced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 48 (n=198, 250, 448)2.336 litersStandard Deviation 0.8189
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationForced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 4 (n=457, 552, 1009)2.277 litersStandard Deviation 0.7999
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationForced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 8 (n=437, 518, 955)2.270 litersStandard Deviation 0.8179
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationForced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 12 (n=426, 499, 925)2.267 litersStandard Deviation 0.8114
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationForced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 16 (n=418, 488, 906)2.267 litersStandard Deviation 0.8101
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationForced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 24 (n=386, 458, 844)2.289 litersStandard Deviation 0.8032
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationForced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 36 (n=291, 354, 645)2.278 litersStandard Deviation 0.8133
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationForced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 60 (n=101, 143, 244)2.360 litersStandard Deviation 0.8292
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationForced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 72 (n=56, 105, 161)2.367 litersStandard Deviation 0.815
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationForced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 84 (n=45, 88, 133)2.384 litersStandard Deviation 0.8411
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationForced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 96 (n=23, 46, 69)2.383 litersStandard Deviation 0.7737
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationForced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointEnd of study (n=28, 54, 82)2.237 litersStandard Deviation 0.8736
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationForced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointEndpoint (n=478, 569, 1047)2.273 litersStandard Deviation 0.8127
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgForced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 72 (n=56, 105, 161)2.387 litersStandard Deviation 0.8466
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgForced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 16 (n=418, 488, 906)2.222 litersStandard Deviation 0.7957
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgForced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointEnd of study (n=28, 54, 82)2.329 litersStandard Deviation 0.8997
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgForced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 84 (n=45, 88, 133)2.422 litersStandard Deviation 0.8425
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgForced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 12 (n=426, 499, 925)2.223 litersStandard Deviation 0.7932
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgForced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 4 (n=457, 552, 1009)2.222 litersStandard Deviation 0.7857
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgForced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 96 (n=23, 46, 69)2.505 litersStandard Deviation 0.8283
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgForced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 48 (n=198, 250, 448)2.261 litersStandard Deviation 0.8099
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgForced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 36 (n=291, 354, 645)2.258 litersStandard Deviation 0.8178
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgForced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 8 (n=437, 518, 955)2.220 litersStandard Deviation 0.8096
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgForced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 60 (n=101, 143, 244)2.308 litersStandard Deviation 0.8689
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgForced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 24 (n=386, 458, 844)2.243 litersStandard Deviation 0.8013
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgForced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointEndpoint (n=478, 569, 1047)2.228 litersStandard Deviation 0.7989
Secondary

Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint

The FVC is the volume of air that can be forcibly blown out after full inspiration, measured in liters. .

Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, end of study and endpoint

Population: Safety analysis set of participants with assessments at stated timeframes

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationForced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 72 (n=56, 105, 161)3.500 litersStandard Deviation 1.1839
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationForced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 84 (n=45, 88, 133)3.606 litersStandard Deviation 1.1403
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationForced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 12 (n=426, 499, 925)3.238 litersStandard Deviation 0.9788
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationForced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 96 (n=23, 46, 69)3.849 litersStandard Deviation 1.2342
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationForced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointEnd of study (n=28, 54, 82)3.524 litersStandard Deviation 1.1842
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationForced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointEndpoint (n=478, 569, 1047)3.250 litersStandard Deviation 1.0194
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationForced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 24 (n=386, 458, 844)3.233 litersStandard Deviation 1.0095
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationForced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 16 (n=418, 488, 906)3.238 litersStandard Deviation 0.9949
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationForced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 36 (n=291, 353, 644)3.324 litersStandard Deviation 1.0571
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationForced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 8 (n=437, 518, 955)3.226 litersStandard Deviation 1.0228
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationForced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 48 (n=198, 250, 448)3.229 litersStandard Deviation 1.0334
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationForced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 60 (n=101, 143, 244)3.323 litersStandard Deviation 1.1874
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationForced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 4 (n=457, 552, 1009)3.222 litersStandard Deviation 0.9929
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationForced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 60 (n=101, 143, 244)3.422 litersStandard Deviation 1.0428
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationForced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 24 (n=386, 458, 844)3.369 litersStandard Deviation 1.0709
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationForced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 84 (n=45, 88, 133)3.406 litersStandard Deviation 1.1535
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationForced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 48 (n=198, 250, 448)3.414 litersStandard Deviation 1.0348
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationForced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 8 (n=437, 518, 955)3.358 litersStandard Deviation 1.0836
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationForced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 96 (n=23, 46, 69)3.381 litersStandard Deviation 1.1145
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationForced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 12 (n=426, 499, 925)3.339 litersStandard Deviation 1.0584
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationForced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 36 (n=291, 353, 644)3.346 litersStandard Deviation 1.0416
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationForced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointEnd of study (n=28, 54, 82)3.321 litersStandard Deviation 1.2443
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationForced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 16 (n=418, 488, 906)3.349 litersStandard Deviation 1.0835
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationForced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 72 (n=56, 105, 161)3.398 litersStandard Deviation 1.0795
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationForced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointEndpoint (n=478, 569, 1047)3.355 litersStandard Deviation 1.0675
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationForced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 4 (n=457, 552, 1009)3.372 litersStandard Deviation 1.0619
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgForced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointEndpoint (n=478, 569, 1047)3.307 litersStandard Deviation 1.0466
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgForced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 12 (n=426, 499, 925)3.292 litersStandard Deviation 1.0232
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgForced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 4 (n=457, 552, 1009)3.304 litersStandard Deviation 1.0334
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgForced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 8 (n=437, 518, 955)3.297 litersStandard Deviation 1.0577
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgForced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 16 (n=418, 488, 906)3.298 litersStandard Deviation 1.0444
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgForced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 24 (n=386, 458, 844)3.307 litersStandard Deviation 1.0449
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgForced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 36 (n=291, 353, 644)3.336 litersStandard Deviation 1.0479
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgForced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 48 (n=198, 250, 448)3.332 litersStandard Deviation 1.0371
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgForced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 60 (n=101, 143, 244)3.381 litersStandard Deviation 1.1037
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgForced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 84 (n=45, 88, 133)3.474 litersStandard Deviation 1.1487
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgForced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 96 (n=23, 46, 69)3.537 litersStandard Deviation 1.168
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgForced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointEnd of study (n=28, 54, 82)3.390 litersStandard Deviation 1.2206
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgForced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 72 (n=56, 105, 161)3.434 litersStandard Deviation 1.1143
Secondary

Participants With a Positive Anti-Reslizumab Antibody Status at Baseline, Weeks 24, 48, 72, 96, End of Study, Endpoint and Overall

Blood samples were collected for the determination of anti-drug antibody (ADAs) before study drug infusion at baseline and every 24 weeks until end of treatment visit or early withdrawal. Serum samples were analyzed by Teva (Teva Biopharmaceuticals USA, Rockville, Maryland, USA) using a validated homogeneous solution based bridging enzyme linked immune sorbent assay (Mikulsis et al 2011, Qui et al 2010). The analysis of anti-reslizumab antibody in patient serum consists of 3 tiers of assays for screening, confirmation, and titer analysis. If a participant had a treatment-emergent ADA response (ie, ADA positive at any of the postdose time points but negative at the predose time point) or if there was a treatment-boosted ADA response (defined as a greater than 4-fold increase from a positive baseline ADA response (Shankar et at 2014), the participant was classified as overall ADA positive. Predose samples for the reslizumab-experienced participants came from the previous studies.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 24, 48, 72, 96, End of Study, Endpoint and Overall

Population: Safety analysis set of participants with assessments at stated timeframes

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationParticipants With a Positive Anti-Reslizumab Antibody Status at Baseline, Weeks 24, 48, 72, 96, End of Study, Endpoint and OverallOverall (n=466, 548)24 participants
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationParticipants With a Positive Anti-Reslizumab Antibody Status at Baseline, Weeks 24, 48, 72, 96, End of Study, Endpoint and OverallBaseline (n=442, 541)16 participants
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationParticipants With a Positive Anti-Reslizumab Antibody Status at Baseline, Weeks 24, 48, 72, 96, End of Study, Endpoint and OverallWeek 24 (n=382, 445)12 participants
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationParticipants With a Positive Anti-Reslizumab Antibody Status at Baseline, Weeks 24, 48, 72, 96, End of Study, Endpoint and OverallWeek 48 (n=187, 247)9 participants
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationParticipants With a Positive Anti-Reslizumab Antibody Status at Baseline, Weeks 24, 48, 72, 96, End of Study, Endpoint and OverallWeek 72 (n=56, 104)4 participants
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationParticipants With a Positive Anti-Reslizumab Antibody Status at Baseline, Weeks 24, 48, 72, 96, End of Study, Endpoint and OverallWeek 96 (n=24, 48)3 participants
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationParticipants With a Positive Anti-Reslizumab Antibody Status at Baseline, Weeks 24, 48, 72, 96, End of Study, Endpoint and OverallEnd of study (n=142, 52)4 participants
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationParticipants With a Positive Anti-Reslizumab Antibody Status at Baseline, Weeks 24, 48, 72, 96, End of Study, Endpoint and OverallEndpoint (n=466, 545)12 participants
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationParticipants With a Positive Anti-Reslizumab Antibody Status at Baseline, Weeks 24, 48, 72, 96, End of Study, Endpoint and OverallEndpoint (n=466, 545)17 participants
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationParticipants With a Positive Anti-Reslizumab Antibody Status at Baseline, Weeks 24, 48, 72, 96, End of Study, Endpoint and OverallOverall (n=466, 548)25 participants
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationParticipants With a Positive Anti-Reslizumab Antibody Status at Baseline, Weeks 24, 48, 72, 96, End of Study, Endpoint and OverallWeek 72 (n=56, 104)4 participants
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationParticipants With a Positive Anti-Reslizumab Antibody Status at Baseline, Weeks 24, 48, 72, 96, End of Study, Endpoint and OverallBaseline (n=442, 541)24 participants
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationParticipants With a Positive Anti-Reslizumab Antibody Status at Baseline, Weeks 24, 48, 72, 96, End of Study, Endpoint and OverallEnd of study (n=142, 52)1 participants
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationParticipants With a Positive Anti-Reslizumab Antibody Status at Baseline, Weeks 24, 48, 72, 96, End of Study, Endpoint and OverallWeek 24 (n=382, 445)13 participants
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationParticipants With a Positive Anti-Reslizumab Antibody Status at Baseline, Weeks 24, 48, 72, 96, End of Study, Endpoint and OverallWeek 96 (n=24, 48)1 participants
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationParticipants With a Positive Anti-Reslizumab Antibody Status at Baseline, Weeks 24, 48, 72, 96, End of Study, Endpoint and OverallWeek 48 (n=187, 247)7 participants
Secondary

Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (% Predicted FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint

The percent predicted FEV1 is the ratio of the volume of air expired in the first second of a forced expiration to the patient's predicted FEV based on a similar population without asthma. Percent predicted lung function values were transcribed directly from the lung function report to the CRF, without any calculation by Teva.

Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, end of study and endpoint

Population: Safety analysis set of participants with assessments at stated timeframes

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationPercent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (% Predicted FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 96 (n=23, 46, 69)83.245 percentage of predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 14.9074
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationPercent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (% Predicted FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 48 (n=198, 250, 448)73.654 percentage of predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 19.9535
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationPercent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (% Predicted FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 36 (n=291, 354, 645)74.805 percentage of predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 20.5634
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationPercent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (% Predicted FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 84 (n=45, 88, 133)79.017 percentage of predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 18.5149
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationPercent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (% Predicted FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 60 (n=101, 143, 244)74.511 percentage of predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 22.5211
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationPercent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (% Predicted FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 12 (n=426, 499, 925)73.797 percentage of predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 19.2586
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationPercent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (% Predicted FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 72 (n=56, 105, 161)76.856 percentage of predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 20.1821
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationPercent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (% Predicted FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 8 (n=437, 518, 955)73.056 percentage of predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 19.9848
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationPercent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (% Predicted FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointEndpoint (n=478, 569, 1047)74.195 percentage of predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 19.8134
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationPercent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (% Predicted FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 16 (n=418, 488, 906)73.797 percentage of predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 19.5962
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationPercent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (% Predicted FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 4 (n=457, 552, 1009)73.295 percentage of predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 19.7933
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationPercent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (% Predicted FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointEnd of study (n=28, 54, 82)79.672 percentage of predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 18.6997
Previous Placebo-Treated SubpopulationPercent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (% Predicted FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 24 (n=386, 458, 844)74.284 percentage of predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 19.5601
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationPercent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (% Predicted FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 36 (n=291, 354, 645)75.487 percentage of predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 20.4589
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationPercent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (% Predicted FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 4 (n=457, 552, 1009)74.808 percentage of predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 19.156
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationPercent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (% Predicted FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 8 (n=437, 518, 955)74.765 percentage of predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 20.357
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationPercent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (% Predicted FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 12 (n=426, 499, 925)74.690 percentage of predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 19.8973
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationPercent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (% Predicted FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 16 (n=418, 488, 906)74.668 percentage of predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 20.2025
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationPercent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (% Predicted FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 48 (n=198, 250, 448)76.627 percentage of predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 19.889
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationPercent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (% Predicted FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 60 (n=101, 143, 244)76.613 percentage of predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 20.2416
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationPercent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (% Predicted FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 72 (n=56, 105, 161)76.812 percentage of predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 17.1937
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationPercent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (% Predicted FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 84 (n=45, 88, 133)77.945 percentage of predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 18.4383
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationPercent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (% Predicted FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 96 (n=23, 46, 69)76.746 percentage of predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 16.2345
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationPercent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (% Predicted FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointEnd of study (n=28, 54, 82)70.633 percentage of predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 20.2554
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationPercent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (% Predicted FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointEndpoint (n=478, 569, 1047)75.107 percentage of predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 19.853
Previous Reslizumab-Treated SubpopulationPercent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (% Predicted FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 24 (n=386, 458, 844)75.208 percentage of predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 19.9621
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgPercent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (% Predicted FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 36 (n=291, 354, 645)75.179 percentage of predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 20.493
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgPercent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (% Predicted FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 4 (n=457, 552, 1009)74.123 percentage of predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 19.4521
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgPercent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (% Predicted FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 96 (n=23, 46, 69)78.912 percentage of predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 15.9949
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgPercent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (% Predicted FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 16 (n=418, 488, 906)74.266 percentage of predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 19.9188
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgPercent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (% Predicted FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 24 (n=386, 458, 844)74.785 percentage of predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 19.7729
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgPercent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (% Predicted FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointEnd of study (n=28, 54, 82)73.719 percentage of predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 20.0902
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgPercent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (% Predicted FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 12 (n=426, 499, 925)74.279 percentage of predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 19.6002
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgPercent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (% Predicted FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 60 (n=101, 143, 244)75.743 percentage of predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 21.195
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgPercent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (% Predicted FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 8 (n=437, 518, 955)73.983 percentage of predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 20.1949
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgPercent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (% Predicted FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 72 (n=56, 105, 161)76.827 percentage of predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 18.2256
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgPercent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (% Predicted FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 48 (n=198, 250, 448)75.313 percentage of predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 19.95
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgPercent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (% Predicted FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointEndpoint (n=478, 569, 1047)74.690 percentage of predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 19.8307
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgPercent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (% Predicted FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and EndpointWeek 84 (n=45, 88, 133)78.308 percentage of predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 18.4011

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026