Eosinophilic Asthma
Conditions
Brief summary
The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the long-term safety of reslizumab at a dosage of 3.0 mg/kg every 4 weeks for approximately 24 months in pediatric and adult patients with eosinophilic asthma as assessed by adverse events, physical examination findings, vital sign measurements, and concomitant medication usage throughout the study (every 4 weeks), clinical laboratory test results, and measurement of antidrug antibodies.
Detailed description
Study patients deemed eligible based on activities from the preceding Teva sponsored double blind study of reslizumab in eosinophilic asthma. Specifically, as per inclusion criterion c, patients must have either completed treatment in a previous Teva-sponsored study or have received at least 2 doses of study drug treatment in a pulmonary function study. Eligible patients could enroll in this study only after completion of the end of treatment visit in a Teva sponsored, randomized, placebo controlled, double blind study of reslizumab in eosinophilic asthma, which served as the screening/baseline visit for participation in this open label extension study. The use of systemic corticosteroids for asthma in any of the previous Teva sponsored double blind studies of reslizumab did not exclude patients from this study. The previous Teva studies were C38072/3081 (NCT01270464), C38072/3082 (NCT01287039), and C38072/3083 (NCT01285323).
Interventions
Reslizumab (3.0 mg/kg) administered intravenously by infusion every 28 days (±7 days), for approximately 24 months
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Written informed consent is obtained. * Patient must have completed treatment in a previous Cephalon-sponsored double-blind asthma exacerbation study or received at least 2 doses of study drug treatment in a pulmonary function study. * The patient must be willing and able to comply with study restrictions and to remain at the clinic for the required duration during the study period, and willing to return to the clinic for the follow-up evaluation as specified in this protocol. * other criteria may apply; please contact the investigator for more information.
Exclusion criteria
* The patient has a clinically meaningful comorbidity that would interfere with the study schedule or procedures, or compromise the patient's safety. * The patient has another confounding underlying lung disorder (eg, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, pulmonary fibrosis, or lung cancer). * The patient is a current smoker. * The patient is expected to be poorly compliant with study drug administration, study procedures, or visits. * The patient has any aggravating factors that are inadequately controlled (e.g., gastroesophageal reflux disease \[GERD\]). * Female patients who are pregnant, or nursing, or, if of childbearing potential and not using a medically accepted, effective method of birth control (eg, spermicide, abstinence, intrauterine device \[IUD\], or steroidal contraceptive \[oral, transdermal, implanted, and injected\] in conjunction with a barrier method) are excluded from this study. * The patient has a current infection or disease that may preclude assessment of asthma. * other criteria may apply; please contact the investigator for more information.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events | Day 1 (post-dose) to Week 65. The endpoint for adverse events was the last postbaseline observation, which included the 90 day follow-up visit. | An adverse event was defined in the protocol as any untoward medical occurrence that develops or worsens in severity during the conduct of a clinical study and does not necessarily have a causal relationship to the study drug. Severity was rated by the investigator on a scale of mild, moderate and severe, with severe= an inability to carry out usual activities. Relation of AE to treatment was determined by the investigator. Serious AEs include death, a life-threatening adverse event, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, persistent or significant disability or incapacity, a congenital anomaly or birth defect, OR an important medical event that jeopardized the patient and required medical intervention to prevent the previously listed serious outcomes. |
| Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab Values | Weeks 4, 8, 24 and 48 | Data represents participants with potentially clinically significant (PCS) abnormal serum chemistry, hematology, and urinalysis values on any of the during treatment lab analyses. Significance criteria: * Blood urea nitrogen: \>=10.71 mmol/L * Creatinine: \>=177 μmol/L * Uric acid: M\>=625, F\>=506 μmol/L * Aspartate aminotransferase: \>=3\*upper limit of normal (ULN). Normal range is 10-43 U/L * Alanine aminotransferase: \>=3\*ULN. Normal range is 10-40 U/L * GGT = gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase: \>= 3\*upper limit of normal. Normal range is 5-49 U/L. * Total bilirubin: \>=34.2 μmol/L * White blood cells- low: \<=3.0\*10\^9/L * White blood cells-high: \>=20\*10\^9/L * Hemoglobin: M\<=115, F\<=95 g/dL * Hematocrit: M\<0.37, F\<0.32 L/L * Platelets: \>=700\*10\^9/L * Absolute neutrophil count: \<=1.0\*10\^9/L * Eosinophils: \>=10 * Urinalysis: ketones, blood, glucose, and total protein: \>=2 unit increase from baseline |
| Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs Values | Week 4 to Week 65 | Data represents participants with PCS vital sign values during any of the during treatment visits or the follow-up visit. Significance criteria * Sitting heart rate-high: \>100 and increase of \>= 30 beats/min (all ages) * Sitting heart rate-low: \<50 and decrease of \>=30 beats/min * Sitting systolic blood pressure (BP)-high: \>130 and increase of \>=30 mmHg (ages 12-17) * Systolic BP-low: \<90 and decrease of \>=30 mmHg (ages \>=18) * Systolic BP-high: \>160 and increase of \>=30 mmHg (ages \>=18) * Sitting diastolic BP-low: \<55 and decrease of \>=12 mmHg (ages 12-17) * Diastolic BP-high: \>85 and increase of \>=12 mmHg (ages 12-17) * Diastolic BP-low: \<50 and decrease of \>=12 mmHg (ages \>=18) * Diastolic BP-high: \>100 and increase of \>=12 mmHg (ages \>=18) * Respiration rate: \>20 and increase of \>=10 breaths/minute (ages 12-17) * Respiration rate: \>24 and increase of \>=10 breaths/minute (ages \>=18) * Body temperature-low: \<96.5° Fahrenheit (all ages) * Body temp-high: \>100.5° F (all ages) |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Forced Expiratory Flow at 25% to 75% Forced Vital Capacity (FEF 25%-75%) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, end of study and endpoint | The FEF 25%-75% is the force expiratory flow at 25% to 75% of the Forced Vital Capacity (FVC), measured in liters/second . |
| Average Daily Use of Short-Acting Beta-Agonist (SABA)Therapy at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, end of study and endpoint | SABA are used for quick relief of asthma symptoms. To measure SABA use, at each clinical visit participants were asked to recall their usage of SABA therapy within the last 3 days of the scheduled visit. If usage was confirmed, the number of puffs used was recorded. For the purpose of summaries, an average daily usage was evaluated by dividing the total number of puffs recorded over 3 days by 3. . |
| Asthma Symptom Utility Index (ASUI) Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, end of study and endpoint | The ASUI is an 11-item instrument designed to assess the frequency and severity of asthma symptoms and side effects, weighted by patient preferences (Revicki et al 1998). ASUI is a utility score that ranges from 0 to 1, with higher values indicating better asthma control. . |
| Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, end of study and endpoint | FEV1 is a standard measurement of air movement in the lungs of patients with asthma obtained from pulmonary function tests. It is the volume of air expired in the first second of a forced expiration using a spirometer. |
| Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) Total Score at Weeks 24, 48, 72, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Weeks 24, 48, 72, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | The AQLQ is a 32-item instrument administered as a self-assessment (Juniper et al 1992). The questionnaire is divided into 4 domains: activity limitation, symptoms, emotional function, and environmental stimuli. Patients were asked to recall their experiences during the last 2 weeks and to respond to each question on a 7-point scale (1=severe impairment, 7=no impairment). The overall AQLQ score is the mean of all 32 responses. Five of the activity questions were patient-specific, which means that each patient identified and scored 5 activities in which the patient was limited by asthma; these 5 activities were identified at the first visit and retained for all subsequent follow-up visits. |
| Participants With a Positive Anti-Reslizumab Antibody Status at Baseline, Weeks 24, 48, 72, 96, End of Study, Endpoint and Overall | Baseline, Weeks 24, 48, 72, 96, End of Study, Endpoint and Overall | Blood samples were collected for the determination of anti-drug antibody (ADAs) before study drug infusion at baseline and every 24 weeks until end of treatment visit or early withdrawal. Serum samples were analyzed by Teva (Teva Biopharmaceuticals USA, Rockville, Maryland, USA) using a validated homogeneous solution based bridging enzyme linked immune sorbent assay (Mikulsis et al 2011, Qui et al 2010). The analysis of anti-reslizumab antibody in patient serum consists of 3 tiers of assays for screening, confirmation, and titer analysis. If a participant had a treatment-emergent ADA response (ie, ADA positive at any of the postdose time points but negative at the predose time point) or if there was a treatment-boosted ADA response (defined as a greater than 4-fold increase from a positive baseline ADA response (Shankar et at 2014), the participant was classified as overall ADA positive. Predose samples for the reslizumab-experienced participants came from the previous studies. |
| Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, end of study and endpoint | The ACQ is a 7-item instrument that measures asthma control (Juniper et al 1999). Six questions are self-assessments; the seventh item, completed by a member of the study staff, is the result of the patient's FEV1 measurement. Each item has 7 possible answers on a scale of 0 to 6, and the total score is the mean of all responses (the total scale is therefore 0-6). A higher score is an indication of poorer asthma control. |
| Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (% Predicted FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, end of study and endpoint | The percent predicted FEV1 is the ratio of the volume of air expired in the first second of a forced expiration to the patient's predicted FEV based on a similar population without asthma. Percent predicted lung function values were transcribed directly from the lung function report to the CRF, without any calculation by Teva. |
| Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, end of study and endpoint | The FVC is the volume of air that can be forcibly blown out after full inspiration, measured in liters. . |
Countries
Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Chile, Colombia, Czechia, Denmark, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Israel, Malaysia, Mexico, Netherlands, New Zealand, Peru, Philippines, Poland, Romania, Russia, Slovakia, South Africa, South Korea, Sweden, Taiwan, Thailand, Ukraine, United States
Participant flow
Recruitment details
A total of 1052 patients with eosinophilic asthma at 201 centers in 30 countries were enrolled in this study.
Pre-assignment details
Four hundred-eighty (46%) patients received reslizumab for the first time in Study 3085, having previously received placebo in Studies 3081, 3082, or 3083.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation The subpopulation of particpants who were treated with placebo in the previous double-blind studies. These participants were treated with resllizumab 3.0 mg/kg intravenously once every 4 weeks ( +-7 days) for up to 24 months in this study. | 481 |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation The subpopulation of particpants who were treated with reslizumab at a variety of dosages in the previous double-blind studies. These participants were treated with resllizumab 3.0 mg/kg intravenously once every 4 weeks ( +-7 days) for up to 24 months in this study. | 571 |
| Total | 1,052 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Adverse Event | 6 | 11 |
| Overall Study | Lack of Efficacy | 4 | 5 |
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 4 | 4 |
| Overall Study | Non-compliance to study medications | 1 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Non-compliance to study procedures | 0 | 1 |
| Overall Study | Other | 3 | 6 |
| Overall Study | Protocol Violation | 2 | 1 |
| Overall Study | Sponsor closure of study | 420 | 476 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 26 | 32 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Total | Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 47.4 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.53 | 47.2 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.02 | 47.1 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.58 |
| Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) | 1.832 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.0912 | 1.624 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.0527 | 1.450 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.987 |
| Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) | 5.170 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.216 | 5.347 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.1875 | 5.496 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.1431 |
| Asthma Symptom Utility Index (ASUI) | 0.803 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.191 | 0.832 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.1728 | 0.861 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.1479 |
| Blood Eosinophil Count | 0.528 10^9 blood eosinophil/L STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.3792 | 0.284 10^9 blood eosinophil/L STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.3577 | 0.078 10^9 blood eosinophil/L STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.148 |
| Body Mass Index | 27.6 kg/m^2 STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.42 | 27.7 kg/m^2 STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.77 | 27.7 kg/m^2 STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.04 |
| Daily average number of puffs in past 3 days | 2.130 puffs/day STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.4996 | 1.827 puffs/day STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.4604 | 1.568 puffs/day STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.3982 |
| Forced Expiratory Flow at 25% to 75% Forced Vital Capacity (FEF 25%-75%) | 1.467 liters/second STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.889 | 1.558 liters/second STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.9009 | 1.634 liters/second STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.9045 |
| Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) | 2.096 liters STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.7856 | 2.199 liters STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.8108 | 2.285 liters STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.8222 |
| Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) | 3.163 liters STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.0357 | 3.273 liters STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.0632 | 3.366 liters STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.0779 |
| Height | 165.3 cm STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.03 | 165.7 cm STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.99 | 166.0 cm STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.96 |
| % Predicted Expiratory Volume In 1 Second | 70.739 percentage of predicted FEV1 STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.756 | 73.115 percentage of predicted FEV1 STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.9664 | 75.116 percentage of predicted FEV1 STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.9404 |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized American Indian or Alaskan Native | 4 participants | 10 participants | 6 participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Asian | 39 participants | 87 participants | 48 participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Black | 22 participants | 44 participants | 22 participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Hispanic or Latino | 83 participants | 201 participants | 118 participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Non-Hispanic and non-Latino | 208 participants | 480 participants | 272 participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Non-Hispanic or Latino | 187 participants | 365 participants | 178 participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Other | 44 participants | 101 participants | 57 participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Pacific Islander | 1 participants | 2 participants | 1 participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Unknown | 3 participants | 6 participants | 3 participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized White | 371 participants | 808 participants | 437 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 314 Participants | 646 Participants | 332 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 167 Participants | 406 Participants | 239 Participants |
| Used Beta Agonist in Past 3 Days No | 180 participants | 454 participants | 274 participants |
| Used Beta Agonist in Past 3 Days Yes | 300 participants | 597 participants | 297 participants |
| Weight | 75.4 kg STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.67 | 76.0 kg STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.32 | 76.5 kg STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.85 |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk |
|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 519 / 1,051 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 78 / 1,051 |
Outcome results
Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events
An adverse event was defined in the protocol as any untoward medical occurrence that develops or worsens in severity during the conduct of a clinical study and does not necessarily have a causal relationship to the study drug. Severity was rated by the investigator on a scale of mild, moderate and severe, with severe= an inability to carry out usual activities. Relation of AE to treatment was determined by the investigator. Serious AEs include death, a life-threatening adverse event, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, persistent or significant disability or incapacity, a congenital anomaly or birth defect, OR an important medical event that jeopardized the patient and required medical intervention to prevent the previously listed serious outcomes.
Time frame: Day 1 (post-dose) to Week 65. The endpoint for adverse events was the last postbaseline observation, which included the 90 day follow-up visit.
Population: Safety analysis set
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events | Treatment-related AE | 49 participants |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events | At least 1 AE | 359 participants |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events | AE causing patient discontinuation | 6 participants |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events | AE up to follow-up period | 344 participants |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events | Severe AE | 31 participants |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events | Serious AE | 33 participants |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events | AE during follow-up period | 78 participants |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events | Death | 1 participants |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events | Severe AE | 47 participants |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events | Death | 2 participants |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events | At least 1 AE | 385 participants |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events | AE up to follow-up period | 367 participants |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events | AE during follow-up period | 82 participants |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events | Treatment-related AE | 41 participants |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events | AE causing patient discontinuation | 12 participants |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events | Serious AE | 45 participants |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events | AE during follow-up period | 160 participants |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events | At least 1 AE | 744 participants |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events | Severe AE | 78 participants |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events | Treatment-related AE | 90 participants |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events | AE causing patient discontinuation | 18 participants |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events | Serious AE | 78 participants |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events | Death | 3 participants |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events | AE up to follow-up period | 711 participants |
Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab Values
Data represents participants with potentially clinically significant (PCS) abnormal serum chemistry, hematology, and urinalysis values on any of the during treatment lab analyses. Significance criteria: * Blood urea nitrogen: \>=10.71 mmol/L * Creatinine: \>=177 μmol/L * Uric acid: M\>=625, F\>=506 μmol/L * Aspartate aminotransferase: \>=3\*upper limit of normal (ULN). Normal range is 10-43 U/L * Alanine aminotransferase: \>=3\*ULN. Normal range is 10-40 U/L * GGT = gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase: \>= 3\*upper limit of normal. Normal range is 5-49 U/L. * Total bilirubin: \>=34.2 μmol/L * White blood cells- low: \<=3.0\*10\^9/L * White blood cells-high: \>=20\*10\^9/L * Hemoglobin: M\<=115, F\<=95 g/dL * Hematocrit: M\<0.37, F\<0.32 L/L * Platelets: \>=700\*10\^9/L * Absolute neutrophil count: \<=1.0\*10\^9/L * Eosinophils: \>=10 * Urinalysis: ketones, blood, glucose, and total protein: \>=2 unit increase from baseline
Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 24 and 48
Population: Safety analysis set, including participants who contributed to the analysis
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab Values | Alanine aminotransferase | 7 participants |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab Values | Creatinine | 3 participants |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab Values | Uric acid | 8 participants |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab Values | Aspartate aminotransferase | 6 participants |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab Values | Blood urea nitrogen | 13 participants |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab Values | GGT | 24 participants |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab Values | Total bilirubin | 3 participants |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab Values | White blood cells- low | 10 participants |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab Values | White blood cells- high | 2 participants |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab Values | Hemoglobin | 10 participants |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab Values | Hematocrit | 13 participants |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab Values | Platelets | 1 participants |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab Values | Absolute neutrophil count | 7 participants |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab Values | Eosinophils | 24 participants |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab Values | Ketones in urine | 15 participants |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab Values | Blood (hemaglobin) in urine | 52 participants |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab Values | Glucose in urine | 22 participants |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab Values | Total protein in urine | 71 participants |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab Values | Total protein in urine | 85 participants |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab Values | Blood urea nitrogen | 10 participants |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab Values | Hemoglobin | 9 participants |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab Values | Absolute neutrophil count | 7 participants |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab Values | Creatinine | 2 participants |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab Values | Ketones in urine | 9 participants |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab Values | Blood (hemaglobin) in urine | 55 participants |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab Values | Uric acid | 5 participants |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab Values | Hematocrit | 13 participants |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab Values | Glucose in urine | 32 participants |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab Values | Aspartate aminotransferase | 5 participants |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab Values | White blood cells- high | 1 participants |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab Values | Eosinophils | 27 participants |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab Values | Alanine aminotransferase | 7 participants |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab Values | White blood cells- low | 8 participants |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab Values | Platelets | 1 participants |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab Values | GGT | 15 participants |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab Values | Total bilirubin | 3 participants |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab Values | GGT | 39 participants |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab Values | Total bilirubin | 6 participants |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab Values | White blood cells- low | 18 participants |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab Values | Ketones in urine | 24 participants |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab Values | White blood cells- high | 3 participants |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab Values | Total protein in urine | 156 participants |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab Values | Hemoglobin | 19 participants |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab Values | Hematocrit | 26 participants |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab Values | Blood (hemaglobin) in urine | 107 participants |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab Values | Platelets | 2 participants |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab Values | Blood urea nitrogen | 23 participants |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab Values | Creatinine | 5 participants |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab Values | Absolute neutrophil count | 14 participants |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab Values | Uric acid | 13 participants |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab Values | Aspartate aminotransferase | 11 participants |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab Values | Alanine aminotransferase | 14 participants |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab Values | Eosinophils | 51 participants |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab Values | Glucose in urine | 54 participants |
Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs Values
Data represents participants with PCS vital sign values during any of the during treatment visits or the follow-up visit. Significance criteria * Sitting heart rate-high: \>100 and increase of \>= 30 beats/min (all ages) * Sitting heart rate-low: \<50 and decrease of \>=30 beats/min * Sitting systolic blood pressure (BP)-high: \>130 and increase of \>=30 mmHg (ages 12-17) * Systolic BP-low: \<90 and decrease of \>=30 mmHg (ages \>=18) * Systolic BP-high: \>160 and increase of \>=30 mmHg (ages \>=18) * Sitting diastolic BP-low: \<55 and decrease of \>=12 mmHg (ages 12-17) * Diastolic BP-high: \>85 and increase of \>=12 mmHg (ages 12-17) * Diastolic BP-low: \<50 and decrease of \>=12 mmHg (ages \>=18) * Diastolic BP-high: \>100 and increase of \>=12 mmHg (ages \>=18) * Respiration rate: \>20 and increase of \>=10 breaths/minute (ages 12-17) * Respiration rate: \>24 and increase of \>=10 breaths/minute (ages \>=18) * Body temperature-low: \<96.5° Fahrenheit (all ages) * Body temp-high: \>100.5° F (all ages)
Time frame: Week 4 to Week 65
Population: Safety analysis set, including participants who contributed to the analysis
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs Values | Respiration rate - high (ages 12-17) | 0 participants |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs Values | Respiration rate - high (ages >=18) | 6 participants |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs Values | Heart rate - low (ages >=18) | 2 participants |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs Values | Body temperature - low (ages 12-17) | 3 participants |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs Values | Systolic BP - low (ages >=18) | 1 participants |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs Values | Body temperature - high (ages 12-17) | 0 participants |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs Values | Body temperature - low (ages >=18) | 102 participants |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs Values | Body temperature - high (ages >=18) | 3 participants |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs Values | Systolic BP - high (ages >=18) | 8 participants |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs Values | Diastolic BP - low (ages 12-17) | 1 participants |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs Values | Heart rate - high (ages >=18) | 8 participants |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs Values | Diastolic BP - high (ages 12-17) | 2 participants |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs Values | Diastolic BP - low (ages >=18) | 2 participants |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs Values | Heart rate - high (ages 12-17) | 1 participants |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs Values | Diastolic - high (ages >=18) | 13 participants |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs Values | Systolic BP - high (ages 12-17) | 0 participants |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs Values | Heart rate - high (ages >=18) | 8 participants |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs Values | Systolic BP - high (ages 12-17) | 1 participants |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs Values | Systolic BP - high (ages >=18) | 8 participants |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs Values | Respiration rate - high (ages >=18) | 2 participants |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs Values | Heart rate - high (ages 12-17) | 2 participants |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs Values | Respiration rate - high (ages 12-17) | 1 participants |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs Values | Body temperature - low (ages 12-17) | 3 participants |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs Values | Diastolic BP - low (ages 12-17) | 1 participants |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs Values | Diastolic BP - low (ages >=18) | 4 participants |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs Values | Body temperature - high (ages 12-17) | 1 participants |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs Values | Systolic BP - low (ages >=18) | 0 participants |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs Values | Diastolic - high (ages >=18) | 12 participants |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs Values | Body temperature - low (ages >=18) | 121 participants |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs Values | Heart rate - low (ages >=18) | 1 participants |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs Values | Diastolic BP - high (ages 12-17) | 1 participants |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs Values | Body temperature - high (ages >=18) | 1 participants |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs Values | Diastolic - high (ages >=18) | 25 participants |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs Values | Heart rate - high (ages 12-17) | 3 participants |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs Values | Heart rate - low (ages >=18) | 3 participants |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs Values | Heart rate - high (ages >=18) | 16 participants |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs Values | Systolic BP - high (ages 12-17) | 1 participants |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs Values | Systolic BP - low (ages >=18) | 1 participants |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs Values | Systolic BP - high (ages >=18) | 16 participants |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs Values | Diastolic BP - low (ages 12-17) | 2 participants |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs Values | Diastolic BP - high (ages 12-17) | 3 participants |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs Values | Diastolic BP - low (ages >=18) | 6 participants |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs Values | Body temperature - high (ages >=18) | 4 participants |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs Values | Respiration rate - high (ages 12-17) | 1 participants |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs Values | Respiration rate - high (ages >=18) | 8 participants |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs Values | Body temperature - low (ages 12-17) | 6 participants |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs Values | Body temperature - high (ages 12-17) | 1 participants |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs Values | Body temperature - low (ages >=18) | 223 participants |
Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint
The ACQ is a 7-item instrument that measures asthma control (Juniper et al 1999). Six questions are self-assessments; the seventh item, completed by a member of the study staff, is the result of the patient's FEV1 measurement. Each item has 7 possible answers on a scale of 0 to 6, and the total score is the mean of all responses (the total scale is therefore 0-6). A higher score is an indication of poorer asthma control.
Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, end of study and endpoint
Population: Safety analysis set of participants with assessments at stated timeframes
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 96 (n=23, 46, 69) | 1.323 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.9862 |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 4 (n=456, 552, 1008) | 1.546 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.0154 |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 8 (n=437, 517, 954) | 1.446 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.9805 |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 12 (n=426, 500, 926) | 1.459 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.0004 |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 16 (n=416, 487, 903) | 1.444 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.0016 |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 24 (n=386, 458, 844) | 1.436 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.0135 |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 36 (n=291, 353, 644) | 1.425 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.0189 |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 48 (n=198, 250, 448) | 1.408 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.9699 |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 60 (n=100, 143, 243) | 1.284 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.9739 |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 72 (n=56, 105, 161) | 1.283 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.9176 |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 84 (n=45, 87, 132) | 1.143 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.902 |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | End of study (n=28, 54, 82) | 1.061 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.7653 |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Endpoint (n=478, 569, 1047) | 1.450 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.9901 |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 96 (n=23, 46, 69) | 1.391 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.9559 |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 24 (n=386, 458, 844) | 1.299 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.9497 |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 36 (n=291, 353, 644) | 1.282 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.9331 |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Endpoint (n=478, 569, 1047) | 1.389 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.9637 |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 48 (n=198, 250, 448) | 1.297 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.981 |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | End of study (n=28, 54, 82) | 1.437 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.975 |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 60 (n=100, 143, 243) | 1.297 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.9432 |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 72 (n=56, 105, 161) | 1.231 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.8295 |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 4 (n=456, 552, 1008) | 1.429 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.9573 |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 8 (n=437, 517, 954) | 1.392 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.9729 |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 84 (n=45, 87, 132) | 1.209 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.9186 |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 12 (n=426, 500, 926) | 1.360 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.932 |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 16 (n=416, 487, 903) | 1.305 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.9299 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 84 (n=45, 87, 132) | 1.186 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.91 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 72 (n=56, 105, 161) | 1.249 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.8587 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 24 (n=386, 458, 844) | 1.362 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.9812 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 96 (n=23, 46, 69) | 1.369 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.9594 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 16 (n=416, 487, 903) | 1.369 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.9655 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 36 (n=291, 353, 644) | 1.347 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.9746 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 4 (n=456, 552, 1008) | 1.482 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.9852 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Endpoint (n=478, 569, 1047) | 1.417 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.9759 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 48 (n=198, 250, 448) | 1.346 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.9766 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 12 (n=426, 500, 926) | 1.405 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.9648 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 8 (n=437, 517, 954) | 1.417 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.9762 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 60 (n=100, 143, 243) | 1.292 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.954 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | End of study (n=28, 54, 82) | 1.308 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.9216 |
Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) Total Score at Weeks 24, 48, 72, 96, End of Study and Endpoint
The AQLQ is a 32-item instrument administered as a self-assessment (Juniper et al 1992). The questionnaire is divided into 4 domains: activity limitation, symptoms, emotional function, and environmental stimuli. Patients were asked to recall their experiences during the last 2 weeks and to respond to each question on a 7-point scale (1=severe impairment, 7=no impairment). The overall AQLQ score is the mean of all 32 responses. Five of the activity questions were patient-specific, which means that each patient identified and scored 5 activities in which the patient was limited by asthma; these 5 activities were identified at the first visit and retained for all subsequent follow-up visits.
Time frame: Weeks 24, 48, 72, 96, End of Study and Endpoint
Population: Safety analysis set of participants with assessments at stated timeframes
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) Total Score at Weeks 24, 48, 72, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Endpoint (n=472, 558, 1030) | 5.535 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.169 |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) Total Score at Weeks 24, 48, 72, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 72 (n=56, 106, 162) | 5.808 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.0002 |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) Total Score at Weeks 24, 48, 72, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | End of study (n=28, 55, 83) | 5.956 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.9431 |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) Total Score at Weeks 24, 48, 72, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 24 (n=382, 452, 834) | 5.551 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.1558 |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) Total Score at Weeks 24, 48, 72, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 96 (n=23, 46, 69) | 5.585 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.1422 |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) Total Score at Weeks 24, 48, 72, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 48 (n=193, 249, 442) | 5.602 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.118 |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) Total Score at Weeks 24, 48, 72, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 96 (n=23, 46, 69) | 5.809 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.134 |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) Total Score at Weeks 24, 48, 72, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | End of study (n=28, 55, 83) | 5.765 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.2361 |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) Total Score at Weeks 24, 48, 72, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 48 (n=193, 249, 442) | 5.725 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.0818 |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) Total Score at Weeks 24, 48, 72, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Endpoint (n=472, 558, 1030) | 5.631 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.1334 |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) Total Score at Weeks 24, 48, 72, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 24 (n=382, 452, 834) | 5.691 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.0651 |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) Total Score at Weeks 24, 48, 72, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 72 (n=56, 106, 162) | 5.809 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.0235 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) Total Score at Weeks 24, 48, 72, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Endpoint (n=472, 558, 1030) | 5.587 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.1503 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) Total Score at Weeks 24, 48, 72, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 24 (n=382, 452, 834) | 5.627 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.1091 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) Total Score at Weeks 24, 48, 72, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 48 (n=193, 249, 442) | 5.672 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.0982 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) Total Score at Weeks 24, 48, 72, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 72 (n=56, 106, 162) | 5.809 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.0124 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) Total Score at Weeks 24, 48, 72, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 96 (n=23, 46, 69) | 5.734 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.1333 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) Total Score at Weeks 24, 48, 72, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | End of study (n=28, 55, 83) | 5.829 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.1434 |
Asthma Symptom Utility Index (ASUI) Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint
The ASUI is an 11-item instrument designed to assess the frequency and severity of asthma symptoms and side effects, weighted by patient preferences (Revicki et al 1998). ASUI is a utility score that ranges from 0 to 1, with higher values indicating better asthma control. .
Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, end of study and endpoint
Population: Safety analysis set of participants with assessments at stated timeframes
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Asthma Symptom Utility Index (ASUI) Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | End of study (n=28, 55, 83) | 0.877 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.0979 |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Asthma Symptom Utility Index (ASUI) Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 72 (n=56, 105, 161) | 0.876 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.1346 |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Asthma Symptom Utility Index (ASUI) Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 36 (n=291, 354, 645) | 0.844 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.1821 |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Asthma Symptom Utility Index (ASUI) Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 12 (n=426, 500, 926) | 0.839 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.1752 |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Asthma Symptom Utility Index (ASUI) Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 60 (n=100, 146, 246) | 0.869 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.1573 |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Asthma Symptom Utility Index (ASUI) Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 48 (n=198, 251, 449) | 0.851 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.1699 |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Asthma Symptom Utility Index (ASUI) Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 4 (n=456, 552, 1008) | 0.831 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.1829 |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Asthma Symptom Utility Index (ASUI) Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 8 (n=436, 514, 950) | 0.843 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.1663 |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Asthma Symptom Utility Index (ASUI) Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 96 (n=23, 46, 69) | 0.822 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.2036 |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Asthma Symptom Utility Index (ASUI) Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 16 (n=416, 486, 902) | 0.845 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.169 |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Asthma Symptom Utility Index (ASUI) Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Endpoint (n=478, 569, 1047) | 0.843 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.1679 |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Asthma Symptom Utility Index (ASUI) Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 84 (n=45, 87, 132) | 0.884 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.146 |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Asthma Symptom Utility Index (ASUI) Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 24 (n=386, 458, 844) | 0.844 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.172 |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Asthma Symptom Utility Index (ASUI) Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 48 (n=198, 251, 449) | 0.856 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.1705 |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Asthma Symptom Utility Index (ASUI) Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 4 (n=456, 552, 1008) | 0.844 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.1631 |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Asthma Symptom Utility Index (ASUI) Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 8 (n=436, 514, 950) | 0.851 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.1596 |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Asthma Symptom Utility Index (ASUI) Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 12 (n=426, 500, 926) | 0.854 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.1578 |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Asthma Symptom Utility Index (ASUI) Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 16 (n=416, 486, 902) | 0.856 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.1659 |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Asthma Symptom Utility Index (ASUI) Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 24 (n=386, 458, 844) | 0.859 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.1602 |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Asthma Symptom Utility Index (ASUI) Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 36 (n=291, 354, 645) | 0.867 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.1536 |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Asthma Symptom Utility Index (ASUI) Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 60 (n=100, 146, 246) | 0.865 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.1513 |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Asthma Symptom Utility Index (ASUI) Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 72 (n=56, 105, 161) | 0.858 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.1509 |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Asthma Symptom Utility Index (ASUI) Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 84 (n=45, 87, 132) | 0.868 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.1541 |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Asthma Symptom Utility Index (ASUI) Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 96 (n=23, 46, 69) | 0.836 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.1729 |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Asthma Symptom Utility Index (ASUI) Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | End of study (n=28, 55, 83) | 0.840 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.2053 |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Asthma Symptom Utility Index (ASUI) Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Endpoint (n=478, 569, 1047) | 0.850 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.1661 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Asthma Symptom Utility Index (ASUI) Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 72 (n=56, 105, 161) | 0.865 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.1453 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Asthma Symptom Utility Index (ASUI) Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 16 (n=416, 486, 902) | 0.851 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.1673 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Asthma Symptom Utility Index (ASUI) Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | End of study (n=28, 55, 83) | 0.853 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.1767 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Asthma Symptom Utility Index (ASUI) Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 84 (n=45, 87, 132) | 0.873 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.151 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Asthma Symptom Utility Index (ASUI) Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 12 (n=426, 500, 926) | 0.847 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.1661 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Asthma Symptom Utility Index (ASUI) Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 4 (n=456, 552, 1008) | 0.838 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.1724 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Asthma Symptom Utility Index (ASUI) Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 96 (n=23, 46, 69) | 0.832 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.1823 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Asthma Symptom Utility Index (ASUI) Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 48 (n=198, 251, 449) | 0.854 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.1701 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Asthma Symptom Utility Index (ASUI) Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 36 (n=291, 354, 645) | 0.857 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.1673 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Asthma Symptom Utility Index (ASUI) Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 8 (n=436, 514, 950) | 0.847 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.1626 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Asthma Symptom Utility Index (ASUI) Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 60 (n=100, 146, 246) | 0.866 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.1534 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Asthma Symptom Utility Index (ASUI) Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 24 (n=386, 458, 844) | 0.852 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.1658 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Asthma Symptom Utility Index (ASUI) Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Endpoint (n=478, 569, 1047) | 0.847 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.1669 |
Average Daily Use of Short-Acting Beta-Agonist (SABA)Therapy at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint
SABA are used for quick relief of asthma symptoms. To measure SABA use, at each clinical visit participants were asked to recall their usage of SABA therapy within the last 3 days of the scheduled visit. If usage was confirmed, the number of puffs used was recorded. For the purpose of summaries, an average daily usage was evaluated by dividing the total number of puffs recorded over 3 days by 3. .
Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, end of study and endpoint
Population: Safety analysis set of participants with assessments at stated timeframes
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Average Daily Use of Short-Acting Beta-Agonist (SABA)Therapy at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | End of study (n=16, 23, 39) | 2.1 # puffs/day | Standard Deviation 1.76 |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Average Daily Use of Short-Acting Beta-Agonist (SABA)Therapy at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 72 (n=29, 47, 76) | 2.1 # puffs/day | Standard Deviation 2.19 |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Average Daily Use of Short-Acting Beta-Agonist (SABA)Therapy at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 36 (n=160, 174, 334) | 2.4 # puffs/day | Standard Deviation 2.27 |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Average Daily Use of Short-Acting Beta-Agonist (SABA)Therapy at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 12 (n=251, 278, 529) | 2.6 # puffs/day | Standard Deviation 2.07 |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Average Daily Use of Short-Acting Beta-Agonist (SABA)Therapy at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 60 (n=50, 64, 114) | 2.1 # puffs/day | Standard Deviation 2.19 |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Average Daily Use of Short-Acting Beta-Agonist (SABA)Therapy at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 48 (n=111, 121, 232) | 2.2 # puffs/day | Standard Deviation 2.28 |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Average Daily Use of Short-Acting Beta-Agonist (SABA)Therapy at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 4 (n=276, 323, 599) | 2.5 # puffs/day | Standard Deviation 2.42 |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Average Daily Use of Short-Acting Beta-Agonist (SABA)Therapy at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 8 (n=258, 302, 560) | 2.4 # puffs/day | Standard Deviation 2.28 |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Average Daily Use of Short-Acting Beta-Agonist (SABA)Therapy at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 96 (n=14, 26, 40) | 1.8 # puffs/day | Standard Deviation 1.41 |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Average Daily Use of Short-Acting Beta-Agonist (SABA)Therapy at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 16 (n=244, 261, 505) | 2.5 # puffs/day | Standard Deviation 2.3 |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Average Daily Use of Short-Acting Beta-Agonist (SABA)Therapy at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Endpoint (n=390, 453, 843) | 2.2 # puffs/day | Standard Deviation 2.2 |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Average Daily Use of Short-Acting Beta-Agonist (SABA)Therapy at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 84 (n=19, 35, 54) | 2.0 # puffs/day | Standard Deviation 1.57 |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Average Daily Use of Short-Acting Beta-Agonist (SABA)Therapy at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 24 (n=211, 243, 454) | 2.6 # puffs/day | Standard Deviation 2.55 |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Average Daily Use of Short-Acting Beta-Agonist (SABA)Therapy at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 48 (n=111, 121, 232) | 2.4 # puffs/day | Standard Deviation 2.54 |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Average Daily Use of Short-Acting Beta-Agonist (SABA)Therapy at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 4 (n=276, 323, 599) | 2.4 # puffs/day | Standard Deviation 2.45 |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Average Daily Use of Short-Acting Beta-Agonist (SABA)Therapy at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 8 (n=258, 302, 560) | 2.4 # puffs/day | Standard Deviation 2.62 |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Average Daily Use of Short-Acting Beta-Agonist (SABA)Therapy at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 12 (n=251, 278, 529) | 2.4 # puffs/day | Standard Deviation 2.5 |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Average Daily Use of Short-Acting Beta-Agonist (SABA)Therapy at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 16 (n=244, 261, 505) | 2.2 # puffs/day | Standard Deviation 2.29 |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Average Daily Use of Short-Acting Beta-Agonist (SABA)Therapy at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 24 (n=211, 243, 454) | 2.3 # puffs/day | Standard Deviation 2.46 |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Average Daily Use of Short-Acting Beta-Agonist (SABA)Therapy at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 36 (n=160, 174, 334) | 2.3 # puffs/day | Standard Deviation 2.64 |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Average Daily Use of Short-Acting Beta-Agonist (SABA)Therapy at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 60 (n=50, 64, 114) | 2.5 # puffs/day | Standard Deviation 3.3 |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Average Daily Use of Short-Acting Beta-Agonist (SABA)Therapy at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 72 (n=29, 47, 76) | 1.8 # puffs/day | Standard Deviation 1.88 |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Average Daily Use of Short-Acting Beta-Agonist (SABA)Therapy at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 84 (n=19, 35, 54) | 2.4 # puffs/day | Standard Deviation 2.38 |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Average Daily Use of Short-Acting Beta-Agonist (SABA)Therapy at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 96 (n=14, 26, 40) | 1.7 # puffs/day | Standard Deviation 1.57 |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Average Daily Use of Short-Acting Beta-Agonist (SABA)Therapy at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | End of study (n=16, 23, 39) | 2.7 # puffs/day | Standard Deviation 1.99 |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Average Daily Use of Short-Acting Beta-Agonist (SABA)Therapy at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Endpoint (n=390, 453, 843) | 2.2 # puffs/day | Standard Deviation 4.09 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Average Daily Use of Short-Acting Beta-Agonist (SABA)Therapy at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 72 (n=29, 47, 76) | 1.9 # puffs/day | Standard Deviation 1.99 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Average Daily Use of Short-Acting Beta-Agonist (SABA)Therapy at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 16 (n=244, 261, 505) | 2.4 # puffs/day | Standard Deviation 2.3 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Average Daily Use of Short-Acting Beta-Agonist (SABA)Therapy at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | End of study (n=16, 23, 39) | 2.4 # puffs/day | Standard Deviation 1.9 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Average Daily Use of Short-Acting Beta-Agonist (SABA)Therapy at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 84 (n=19, 35, 54) | 2.2 # puffs/day | Standard Deviation 2.12 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Average Daily Use of Short-Acting Beta-Agonist (SABA)Therapy at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 12 (n=251, 278, 529) | 2.5 # puffs/day | Standard Deviation 2.3 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Average Daily Use of Short-Acting Beta-Agonist (SABA)Therapy at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 4 (n=276, 323, 599) | 2.5 # puffs/day | Standard Deviation 2.43 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Average Daily Use of Short-Acting Beta-Agonist (SABA)Therapy at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 96 (n=14, 26, 40) | 1.8 # puffs/day | Standard Deviation 1.5 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Average Daily Use of Short-Acting Beta-Agonist (SABA)Therapy at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 48 (n=111, 121, 232) | 2.3 # puffs/day | Standard Deviation 2.42 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Average Daily Use of Short-Acting Beta-Agonist (SABA)Therapy at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 36 (n=160, 174, 334) | 2.3 # puffs/day | Standard Deviation 2.47 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Average Daily Use of Short-Acting Beta-Agonist (SABA)Therapy at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 8 (n=258, 302, 560) | 2.4 # puffs/day | Standard Deviation 2.46 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Average Daily Use of Short-Acting Beta-Agonist (SABA)Therapy at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 60 (n=50, 64, 114) | 2.3 # puffs/day | Standard Deviation 2.86 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Average Daily Use of Short-Acting Beta-Agonist (SABA)Therapy at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 24 (n=211, 243, 454) | 2.4 # puffs/day | Standard Deviation 2.51 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Average Daily Use of Short-Acting Beta-Agonist (SABA)Therapy at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Endpoint (n=390, 453, 843) | 2.2 # puffs/day | Standard Deviation 3.35 |
Forced Expiratory Flow at 25% to 75% Forced Vital Capacity (FEF 25%-75%) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint
The FEF 25%-75% is the force expiratory flow at 25% to 75% of the Forced Vital Capacity (FVC), measured in liters/second .
Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, end of study and endpoint
Population: Safety analysis set of participants with assessments at stated timeframes
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Forced Expiratory Flow at 25% to 75% Forced Vital Capacity (FEF 25%-75%) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | End of study (n=28, 54, 82) | 1.939 liters/second | Standard Deviation 1.1105 |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Forced Expiratory Flow at 25% to 75% Forced Vital Capacity (FEF 25%-75%) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 72 (n=56, 105, 161) | 1.810 liters/second | Standard Deviation 1.0239 |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Forced Expiratory Flow at 25% to 75% Forced Vital Capacity (FEF 25%-75%) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 36 (n=285, 349, 634) | 1.642 liters/second | Standard Deviation 1.1087 |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Forced Expiratory Flow at 25% to 75% Forced Vital Capacity (FEF 25%-75%) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 12 (n=418, 494, 912) | 1.587 liters/second | Standard Deviation 0.9833 |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Forced Expiratory Flow at 25% to 75% Forced Vital Capacity (FEF 25%-75%) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 60 (n=99, 143, 242) | 1.605 liters/second | Standard Deviation 1.0869 |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Forced Expiratory Flow at 25% to 75% Forced Vital Capacity (FEF 25%-75%) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 48 (n=191, 249, 440) | 1.628 liters/second | Standard Deviation 1.0408 |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Forced Expiratory Flow at 25% to 75% Forced Vital Capacity (FEF 25%-75%) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 4 (n=446, 545, 991) | 1.558 liters/second | Standard Deviation 0.9363 |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Forced Expiratory Flow at 25% to 75% Forced Vital Capacity (FEF 25%-75%) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 8 (n=429, 513, 942) | 1.546 liters/second | Standard Deviation 0.9279 |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Forced Expiratory Flow at 25% to 75% Forced Vital Capacity (FEF 25%-75%) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 96 (n=23, 46, 69) | 2.120 liters/second | Standard Deviation 1.0597 |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Forced Expiratory Flow at 25% to 75% Forced Vital Capacity (FEF 25%-75%) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 16 (n=408, 483, 891) | 1.561 liters/second | Standard Deviation 0.9427 |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Forced Expiratory Flow at 25% to 75% Forced Vital Capacity (FEF 25%-75%) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Endpoint (n=468, 563, 1031) | 1.546 liters/second | Standard Deviation 0.9041 |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Forced Expiratory Flow at 25% to 75% Forced Vital Capacity (FEF 25%-75%) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 84 (n=45, 88, 133) | 1.848 liters/second | Standard Deviation 0.9047 |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Forced Expiratory Flow at 25% to 75% Forced Vital Capacity (FEF 25%-75%) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 24 (n=377, 453, 830) | 1.619 liters/second | Standard Deviation 0.9967 |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Forced Expiratory Flow at 25% to 75% Forced Vital Capacity (FEF 25%-75%) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 48 (n=191, 249, 440) | 1.691 liters/second | Standard Deviation 0.945 |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Forced Expiratory Flow at 25% to 75% Forced Vital Capacity (FEF 25%-75%) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 4 (n=446, 545, 991) | 1.614 liters/second | Standard Deviation 0.9055 |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Forced Expiratory Flow at 25% to 75% Forced Vital Capacity (FEF 25%-75%) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 8 (n=429, 513, 942) | 1.618 liters/second | Standard Deviation 0.9255 |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Forced Expiratory Flow at 25% to 75% Forced Vital Capacity (FEF 25%-75%) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 12 (n=418, 494, 912) | 1.624 liters/second | Standard Deviation 0.9367 |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Forced Expiratory Flow at 25% to 75% Forced Vital Capacity (FEF 25%-75%) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 16 (n=408, 483, 891) | 1.620 liters/second | Standard Deviation 0.9068 |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Forced Expiratory Flow at 25% to 75% Forced Vital Capacity (FEF 25%-75%) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 24 (n=377, 453, 830) | 1.637 liters/second | Standard Deviation 0.9227 |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Forced Expiratory Flow at 25% to 75% Forced Vital Capacity (FEF 25%-75%) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 36 (n=285, 349, 634) | 1.650 liters/second | Standard Deviation 0.9193 |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Forced Expiratory Flow at 25% to 75% Forced Vital Capacity (FEF 25%-75%) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 60 (n=99, 143, 242) | 1.791 liters/second | Standard Deviation 1.1508 |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Forced Expiratory Flow at 25% to 75% Forced Vital Capacity (FEF 25%-75%) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 72 (n=56, 105, 161) | 1.766 liters/second | Standard Deviation 1.0341 |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Forced Expiratory Flow at 25% to 75% Forced Vital Capacity (FEF 25%-75%) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 84 (n=45, 88, 133) | 1.892 liters/second | Standard Deviation 1.1499 |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Forced Expiratory Flow at 25% to 75% Forced Vital Capacity (FEF 25%-75%) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 96 (n=23, 46, 69) | 1.942 liters/second | Standard Deviation 1.0453 |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Forced Expiratory Flow at 25% to 75% Forced Vital Capacity (FEF 25%-75%) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | End of study (n=28, 54, 82) | 1.639 liters/second | Standard Deviation 0.9079 |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Forced Expiratory Flow at 25% to 75% Forced Vital Capacity (FEF 25%-75%) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Endpoint (n=468, 563, 1031) | 1.629 liters/second | Standard Deviation 0.93 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Forced Expiratory Flow at 25% to 75% Forced Vital Capacity (FEF 25%-75%) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 72 (n=56, 105, 161) | 1.781 liters/second | Standard Deviation 1.0276 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Forced Expiratory Flow at 25% to 75% Forced Vital Capacity (FEF 25%-75%) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 16 (n=408, 483, 891) | 1.593 liters/second | Standard Deviation 0.9234 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Forced Expiratory Flow at 25% to 75% Forced Vital Capacity (FEF 25%-75%) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | End of study (n=28, 54, 82) | 1.741 liters/second | Standard Deviation 0.9854 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Forced Expiratory Flow at 25% to 75% Forced Vital Capacity (FEF 25%-75%) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 84 (n=45, 88, 133) | 1.877 liters/second | Standard Deviation 1.07 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Forced Expiratory Flow at 25% to 75% Forced Vital Capacity (FEF 25%-75%) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 12 (n=418, 494, 912) | 1.607 liters/second | Standard Deviation 0.958 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Forced Expiratory Flow at 25% to 75% Forced Vital Capacity (FEF 25%-75%) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 4 (n=446, 545, 991) | 1.589 liters/second | Standard Deviation 0.9195 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Forced Expiratory Flow at 25% to 75% Forced Vital Capacity (FEF 25%-75%) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 96 (n=23, 46, 69) | 2.001 liters/second | Standard Deviation 1.0457 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Forced Expiratory Flow at 25% to 75% Forced Vital Capacity (FEF 25%-75%) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 48 (n=191, 249, 440) | 1.664 liters/second | Standard Deviation 0.9871 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Forced Expiratory Flow at 25% to 75% Forced Vital Capacity (FEF 25%-75%) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 36 (n=285, 349, 634) | 1.646 liters/second | Standard Deviation 1.008 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Forced Expiratory Flow at 25% to 75% Forced Vital Capacity (FEF 25%-75%) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 8 (n=429, 513, 942) | 1.585 liters/second | Standard Deviation 0.9268 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Forced Expiratory Flow at 25% to 75% Forced Vital Capacity (FEF 25%-75%) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 60 (n=99, 143, 242) | 1.715 liters/second | Standard Deviation 1.1265 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Forced Expiratory Flow at 25% to 75% Forced Vital Capacity (FEF 25%-75%) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 24 (n=377, 453, 830) | 1.629 liters/second | Standard Deviation 0.9565 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Forced Expiratory Flow at 25% to 75% Forced Vital Capacity (FEF 25%-75%) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Endpoint (n=468, 563, 1031) | 1.592 liters/second | Standard Deviation 0.9188 |
Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint
FEV1 is a standard measurement of air movement in the lungs of patients with asthma obtained from pulmonary function tests. It is the volume of air expired in the first second of a forced expiration using a spirometer.
Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, end of study and endpoint
Population: Safety analysis set of participants with assessments at stated timeframes
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | End of study (n=28, 54, 82) | 2.505 liters | Standard Deviation 0.9386 |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 72 (n=56, 105, 161) | 2.424 liters | Standard Deviation 0.9093 |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 36 (n=291, 354, 645) | 2.234 liters | Standard Deviation 0.824 |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 12 (n=426, 499, 925) | 2.171 liters | Standard Deviation 0.769 |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 60 (n=101, 143, 244) | 2.234 liters | Standard Deviation 0.9214 |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 48 (n=198, 250, 448) | 2.167 liters | Standard Deviation 0.7905 |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 4 (n=457, 552, 1009) | 2.155 liters | Standard Deviation 0.7636 |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 8 (n=437, 518, 955) | 2.162 liters | Standard Deviation 0.7966 |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 96 (n=23, 46, 69) | 2.748 liters | Standard Deviation 0.8963 |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 16 (n=418, 488, 906) | 2.169 liters | Standard Deviation 0.7761 |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Endpoint (n=478, 569, 1047) | 2.174 liters | Standard Deviation 0.7798 |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 84 (n=45, 88, 133) | 2.496 liters | Standard Deviation 0.8496 |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 24 (n=386, 458, 844) | 2.188 liters | Standard Deviation 0.7966 |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 48 (n=198, 250, 448) | 2.336 liters | Standard Deviation 0.8189 |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 4 (n=457, 552, 1009) | 2.277 liters | Standard Deviation 0.7999 |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 8 (n=437, 518, 955) | 2.270 liters | Standard Deviation 0.8179 |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 12 (n=426, 499, 925) | 2.267 liters | Standard Deviation 0.8114 |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 16 (n=418, 488, 906) | 2.267 liters | Standard Deviation 0.8101 |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 24 (n=386, 458, 844) | 2.289 liters | Standard Deviation 0.8032 |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 36 (n=291, 354, 645) | 2.278 liters | Standard Deviation 0.8133 |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 60 (n=101, 143, 244) | 2.360 liters | Standard Deviation 0.8292 |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 72 (n=56, 105, 161) | 2.367 liters | Standard Deviation 0.815 |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 84 (n=45, 88, 133) | 2.384 liters | Standard Deviation 0.8411 |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 96 (n=23, 46, 69) | 2.383 liters | Standard Deviation 0.7737 |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | End of study (n=28, 54, 82) | 2.237 liters | Standard Deviation 0.8736 |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Endpoint (n=478, 569, 1047) | 2.273 liters | Standard Deviation 0.8127 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 72 (n=56, 105, 161) | 2.387 liters | Standard Deviation 0.8466 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 16 (n=418, 488, 906) | 2.222 liters | Standard Deviation 0.7957 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | End of study (n=28, 54, 82) | 2.329 liters | Standard Deviation 0.8997 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 84 (n=45, 88, 133) | 2.422 liters | Standard Deviation 0.8425 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 12 (n=426, 499, 925) | 2.223 liters | Standard Deviation 0.7932 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 4 (n=457, 552, 1009) | 2.222 liters | Standard Deviation 0.7857 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 96 (n=23, 46, 69) | 2.505 liters | Standard Deviation 0.8283 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 48 (n=198, 250, 448) | 2.261 liters | Standard Deviation 0.8099 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 36 (n=291, 354, 645) | 2.258 liters | Standard Deviation 0.8178 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 8 (n=437, 518, 955) | 2.220 liters | Standard Deviation 0.8096 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 60 (n=101, 143, 244) | 2.308 liters | Standard Deviation 0.8689 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 24 (n=386, 458, 844) | 2.243 liters | Standard Deviation 0.8013 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Endpoint (n=478, 569, 1047) | 2.228 liters | Standard Deviation 0.7989 |
Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint
The FVC is the volume of air that can be forcibly blown out after full inspiration, measured in liters. .
Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, end of study and endpoint
Population: Safety analysis set of participants with assessments at stated timeframes
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 72 (n=56, 105, 161) | 3.500 liters | Standard Deviation 1.1839 |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 84 (n=45, 88, 133) | 3.606 liters | Standard Deviation 1.1403 |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 12 (n=426, 499, 925) | 3.238 liters | Standard Deviation 0.9788 |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 96 (n=23, 46, 69) | 3.849 liters | Standard Deviation 1.2342 |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | End of study (n=28, 54, 82) | 3.524 liters | Standard Deviation 1.1842 |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Endpoint (n=478, 569, 1047) | 3.250 liters | Standard Deviation 1.0194 |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 24 (n=386, 458, 844) | 3.233 liters | Standard Deviation 1.0095 |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 16 (n=418, 488, 906) | 3.238 liters | Standard Deviation 0.9949 |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 36 (n=291, 353, 644) | 3.324 liters | Standard Deviation 1.0571 |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 8 (n=437, 518, 955) | 3.226 liters | Standard Deviation 1.0228 |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 48 (n=198, 250, 448) | 3.229 liters | Standard Deviation 1.0334 |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 60 (n=101, 143, 244) | 3.323 liters | Standard Deviation 1.1874 |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 4 (n=457, 552, 1009) | 3.222 liters | Standard Deviation 0.9929 |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 60 (n=101, 143, 244) | 3.422 liters | Standard Deviation 1.0428 |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 24 (n=386, 458, 844) | 3.369 liters | Standard Deviation 1.0709 |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 84 (n=45, 88, 133) | 3.406 liters | Standard Deviation 1.1535 |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 48 (n=198, 250, 448) | 3.414 liters | Standard Deviation 1.0348 |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 8 (n=437, 518, 955) | 3.358 liters | Standard Deviation 1.0836 |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 96 (n=23, 46, 69) | 3.381 liters | Standard Deviation 1.1145 |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 12 (n=426, 499, 925) | 3.339 liters | Standard Deviation 1.0584 |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 36 (n=291, 353, 644) | 3.346 liters | Standard Deviation 1.0416 |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | End of study (n=28, 54, 82) | 3.321 liters | Standard Deviation 1.2443 |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 16 (n=418, 488, 906) | 3.349 liters | Standard Deviation 1.0835 |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 72 (n=56, 105, 161) | 3.398 liters | Standard Deviation 1.0795 |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Endpoint (n=478, 569, 1047) | 3.355 liters | Standard Deviation 1.0675 |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 4 (n=457, 552, 1009) | 3.372 liters | Standard Deviation 1.0619 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Endpoint (n=478, 569, 1047) | 3.307 liters | Standard Deviation 1.0466 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 12 (n=426, 499, 925) | 3.292 liters | Standard Deviation 1.0232 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 4 (n=457, 552, 1009) | 3.304 liters | Standard Deviation 1.0334 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 8 (n=437, 518, 955) | 3.297 liters | Standard Deviation 1.0577 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 16 (n=418, 488, 906) | 3.298 liters | Standard Deviation 1.0444 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 24 (n=386, 458, 844) | 3.307 liters | Standard Deviation 1.0449 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 36 (n=291, 353, 644) | 3.336 liters | Standard Deviation 1.0479 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 48 (n=198, 250, 448) | 3.332 liters | Standard Deviation 1.0371 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 60 (n=101, 143, 244) | 3.381 liters | Standard Deviation 1.1037 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 84 (n=45, 88, 133) | 3.474 liters | Standard Deviation 1.1487 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 96 (n=23, 46, 69) | 3.537 liters | Standard Deviation 1.168 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | End of study (n=28, 54, 82) | 3.390 liters | Standard Deviation 1.2206 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 72 (n=56, 105, 161) | 3.434 liters | Standard Deviation 1.1143 |
Participants With a Positive Anti-Reslizumab Antibody Status at Baseline, Weeks 24, 48, 72, 96, End of Study, Endpoint and Overall
Blood samples were collected for the determination of anti-drug antibody (ADAs) before study drug infusion at baseline and every 24 weeks until end of treatment visit or early withdrawal. Serum samples were analyzed by Teva (Teva Biopharmaceuticals USA, Rockville, Maryland, USA) using a validated homogeneous solution based bridging enzyme linked immune sorbent assay (Mikulsis et al 2011, Qui et al 2010). The analysis of anti-reslizumab antibody in patient serum consists of 3 tiers of assays for screening, confirmation, and titer analysis. If a participant had a treatment-emergent ADA response (ie, ADA positive at any of the postdose time points but negative at the predose time point) or if there was a treatment-boosted ADA response (defined as a greater than 4-fold increase from a positive baseline ADA response (Shankar et at 2014), the participant was classified as overall ADA positive. Predose samples for the reslizumab-experienced participants came from the previous studies.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 24, 48, 72, 96, End of Study, Endpoint and Overall
Population: Safety analysis set of participants with assessments at stated timeframes
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Participants With a Positive Anti-Reslizumab Antibody Status at Baseline, Weeks 24, 48, 72, 96, End of Study, Endpoint and Overall | Overall (n=466, 548) | 24 participants |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Participants With a Positive Anti-Reslizumab Antibody Status at Baseline, Weeks 24, 48, 72, 96, End of Study, Endpoint and Overall | Baseline (n=442, 541) | 16 participants |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Participants With a Positive Anti-Reslizumab Antibody Status at Baseline, Weeks 24, 48, 72, 96, End of Study, Endpoint and Overall | Week 24 (n=382, 445) | 12 participants |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Participants With a Positive Anti-Reslizumab Antibody Status at Baseline, Weeks 24, 48, 72, 96, End of Study, Endpoint and Overall | Week 48 (n=187, 247) | 9 participants |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Participants With a Positive Anti-Reslizumab Antibody Status at Baseline, Weeks 24, 48, 72, 96, End of Study, Endpoint and Overall | Week 72 (n=56, 104) | 4 participants |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Participants With a Positive Anti-Reslizumab Antibody Status at Baseline, Weeks 24, 48, 72, 96, End of Study, Endpoint and Overall | Week 96 (n=24, 48) | 3 participants |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Participants With a Positive Anti-Reslizumab Antibody Status at Baseline, Weeks 24, 48, 72, 96, End of Study, Endpoint and Overall | End of study (n=142, 52) | 4 participants |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Participants With a Positive Anti-Reslizumab Antibody Status at Baseline, Weeks 24, 48, 72, 96, End of Study, Endpoint and Overall | Endpoint (n=466, 545) | 12 participants |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Participants With a Positive Anti-Reslizumab Antibody Status at Baseline, Weeks 24, 48, 72, 96, End of Study, Endpoint and Overall | Endpoint (n=466, 545) | 17 participants |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Participants With a Positive Anti-Reslizumab Antibody Status at Baseline, Weeks 24, 48, 72, 96, End of Study, Endpoint and Overall | Overall (n=466, 548) | 25 participants |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Participants With a Positive Anti-Reslizumab Antibody Status at Baseline, Weeks 24, 48, 72, 96, End of Study, Endpoint and Overall | Week 72 (n=56, 104) | 4 participants |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Participants With a Positive Anti-Reslizumab Antibody Status at Baseline, Weeks 24, 48, 72, 96, End of Study, Endpoint and Overall | Baseline (n=442, 541) | 24 participants |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Participants With a Positive Anti-Reslizumab Antibody Status at Baseline, Weeks 24, 48, 72, 96, End of Study, Endpoint and Overall | End of study (n=142, 52) | 1 participants |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Participants With a Positive Anti-Reslizumab Antibody Status at Baseline, Weeks 24, 48, 72, 96, End of Study, Endpoint and Overall | Week 24 (n=382, 445) | 13 participants |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Participants With a Positive Anti-Reslizumab Antibody Status at Baseline, Weeks 24, 48, 72, 96, End of Study, Endpoint and Overall | Week 96 (n=24, 48) | 1 participants |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Participants With a Positive Anti-Reslizumab Antibody Status at Baseline, Weeks 24, 48, 72, 96, End of Study, Endpoint and Overall | Week 48 (n=187, 247) | 7 participants |
Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (% Predicted FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint
The percent predicted FEV1 is the ratio of the volume of air expired in the first second of a forced expiration to the patient's predicted FEV based on a similar population without asthma. Percent predicted lung function values were transcribed directly from the lung function report to the CRF, without any calculation by Teva.
Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, end of study and endpoint
Population: Safety analysis set of participants with assessments at stated timeframes
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (% Predicted FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 96 (n=23, 46, 69) | 83.245 percentage of predicted FEV1 | Standard Deviation 14.9074 |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (% Predicted FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 48 (n=198, 250, 448) | 73.654 percentage of predicted FEV1 | Standard Deviation 19.9535 |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (% Predicted FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 36 (n=291, 354, 645) | 74.805 percentage of predicted FEV1 | Standard Deviation 20.5634 |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (% Predicted FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 84 (n=45, 88, 133) | 79.017 percentage of predicted FEV1 | Standard Deviation 18.5149 |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (% Predicted FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 60 (n=101, 143, 244) | 74.511 percentage of predicted FEV1 | Standard Deviation 22.5211 |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (% Predicted FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 12 (n=426, 499, 925) | 73.797 percentage of predicted FEV1 | Standard Deviation 19.2586 |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (% Predicted FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 72 (n=56, 105, 161) | 76.856 percentage of predicted FEV1 | Standard Deviation 20.1821 |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (% Predicted FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 8 (n=437, 518, 955) | 73.056 percentage of predicted FEV1 | Standard Deviation 19.9848 |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (% Predicted FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Endpoint (n=478, 569, 1047) | 74.195 percentage of predicted FEV1 | Standard Deviation 19.8134 |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (% Predicted FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 16 (n=418, 488, 906) | 73.797 percentage of predicted FEV1 | Standard Deviation 19.5962 |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (% Predicted FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 4 (n=457, 552, 1009) | 73.295 percentage of predicted FEV1 | Standard Deviation 19.7933 |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (% Predicted FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | End of study (n=28, 54, 82) | 79.672 percentage of predicted FEV1 | Standard Deviation 18.6997 |
| Previous Placebo-Treated Subpopulation | Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (% Predicted FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 24 (n=386, 458, 844) | 74.284 percentage of predicted FEV1 | Standard Deviation 19.5601 |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (% Predicted FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 36 (n=291, 354, 645) | 75.487 percentage of predicted FEV1 | Standard Deviation 20.4589 |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (% Predicted FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 4 (n=457, 552, 1009) | 74.808 percentage of predicted FEV1 | Standard Deviation 19.156 |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (% Predicted FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 8 (n=437, 518, 955) | 74.765 percentage of predicted FEV1 | Standard Deviation 20.357 |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (% Predicted FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 12 (n=426, 499, 925) | 74.690 percentage of predicted FEV1 | Standard Deviation 19.8973 |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (% Predicted FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 16 (n=418, 488, 906) | 74.668 percentage of predicted FEV1 | Standard Deviation 20.2025 |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (% Predicted FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 48 (n=198, 250, 448) | 76.627 percentage of predicted FEV1 | Standard Deviation 19.889 |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (% Predicted FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 60 (n=101, 143, 244) | 76.613 percentage of predicted FEV1 | Standard Deviation 20.2416 |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (% Predicted FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 72 (n=56, 105, 161) | 76.812 percentage of predicted FEV1 | Standard Deviation 17.1937 |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (% Predicted FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 84 (n=45, 88, 133) | 77.945 percentage of predicted FEV1 | Standard Deviation 18.4383 |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (% Predicted FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 96 (n=23, 46, 69) | 76.746 percentage of predicted FEV1 | Standard Deviation 16.2345 |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (% Predicted FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | End of study (n=28, 54, 82) | 70.633 percentage of predicted FEV1 | Standard Deviation 20.2554 |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (% Predicted FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Endpoint (n=478, 569, 1047) | 75.107 percentage of predicted FEV1 | Standard Deviation 19.853 |
| Previous Reslizumab-Treated Subpopulation | Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (% Predicted FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 24 (n=386, 458, 844) | 75.208 percentage of predicted FEV1 | Standard Deviation 19.9621 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (% Predicted FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 36 (n=291, 354, 645) | 75.179 percentage of predicted FEV1 | Standard Deviation 20.493 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (% Predicted FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 4 (n=457, 552, 1009) | 74.123 percentage of predicted FEV1 | Standard Deviation 19.4521 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (% Predicted FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 96 (n=23, 46, 69) | 78.912 percentage of predicted FEV1 | Standard Deviation 15.9949 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (% Predicted FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 16 (n=418, 488, 906) | 74.266 percentage of predicted FEV1 | Standard Deviation 19.9188 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (% Predicted FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 24 (n=386, 458, 844) | 74.785 percentage of predicted FEV1 | Standard Deviation 19.7729 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (% Predicted FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | End of study (n=28, 54, 82) | 73.719 percentage of predicted FEV1 | Standard Deviation 20.0902 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (% Predicted FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 12 (n=426, 499, 925) | 74.279 percentage of predicted FEV1 | Standard Deviation 19.6002 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (% Predicted FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 60 (n=101, 143, 244) | 75.743 percentage of predicted FEV1 | Standard Deviation 21.195 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (% Predicted FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 8 (n=437, 518, 955) | 73.983 percentage of predicted FEV1 | Standard Deviation 20.1949 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (% Predicted FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 72 (n=56, 105, 161) | 76.827 percentage of predicted FEV1 | Standard Deviation 18.2256 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (% Predicted FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 48 (n=198, 250, 448) | 75.313 percentage of predicted FEV1 | Standard Deviation 19.95 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (% Predicted FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Endpoint (n=478, 569, 1047) | 74.690 percentage of predicted FEV1 | Standard Deviation 19.8307 |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (% Predicted FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, End of Study and Endpoint | Week 84 (n=45, 88, 133) | 78.308 percentage of predicted FEV1 | Standard Deviation 18.4011 |