Skip to content

Surveillance for Adverse Events Following Pandemic H1N1 Immunization

Short and Long-Term Electronic Surveillance of a Large Number of Healthcare Workers Following Administration of an Adjuvanted Ph1n1 Vaccine

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01289418
Enrollment
6525
Registered
2011-02-03
Start date
2009-10-31
Completion date
2010-05-31
Last updated
2012-08-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Novel Influenza A/H1N1

Keywords

H1N1, vaccine safety, adverse events, health care workers

Brief summary

Influenza vaccines are continuously modified to adjust to the virus antigenic shifts or drifts, and its safety profile may vary. While generally considered safe, influenza vaccines have been associated in the past with increases in cases of Guillain-Barré syndrome (1976) or with oculorespiratory syndrome (2001). The emergence of a novel strain of H1N1 influenza virus (pH1N1) has prompted health departments worldwide to prepare for mass vaccination campaigns with a new H1N1 pandemic vaccine. Following recommendations of the World Health Organization (WHO), Canada immunized its population with a dose-sparing adjuvanted vaccine. While the adjuvant developed by GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) has been administered to over 39 000 people, only a few hundred will have been vaccinated with the H1N1 formulation in clinical trials before the mass campaign was launched. With this small number, adverse events occurring at a rate \< 1% will not be detected by these clinical trials. Considering that most cases of pH1N1 to date have been relatively mild, it will be imperative to rapidly detect adverse events serious enough to reconsider the use of the vaccine. Passive surveillance is collecting notifications of adverse events but the sensitivity of this system is not high and its timeliness is not necessarily optimal. In Canada, healthcare workers (HCW) are among those who were offered the new pandemic vaccine in priority. Because they were offered the vaccine early in the campaign and because they constitute a well-defined group in good general health, this group of people may be well suited for monitoring the safety of the pH1N1 vaccine. The main objective of this project was to estimate in HCW vaccinated against pH1N1 the frequency of adverse events of sufficient severity to cause work absenteeism or medical consultation. The active surveillance was done in HCW from 3 sites (Canadian hospitals) participating in the Pandemic Influenza Research Network (PCIRN): (1) Halifax (Nova Scotia), (2) Quebec City (Quebec): 3 hospitals, (3) Toronto

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

GlaxoSmithKline
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Institut National en Santé Publique du Québec
CollaboratorOTHER
Laval University
CollaboratorOTHER
CHU de Quebec-Universite Laval
CollaboratorOTHER
Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre
CollaboratorOTHER
Mount Sinai Hospital, New York
CollaboratorOTHER
The Ottawa Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation
CollaboratorOTHER
Alberta Children's Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Vancouver General Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
PHAC/CIHR Influenza Research Network
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* To be a health care worker from one of the three Canadian Hospitals participating in the Public Health Agency of Canada/Canadian Institutes for Health Research- Influenza Research Network (PCIRN): Quebec City, Toronto, and Halifax. * To have been immunized with the pH1N1 vaccine. * To have an email address. * To be 18 years old and older.

Exclusion criteria

\-

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Number of Participants Who Had Experienced a New Health Problem or the Worsening of an Existing Health Condition That Resulted in a Medical Consultation.at day 8, 15 and 29
Number of Participants Who Had Experienced a New Health Problem or the Worsening of an Existing Health Condition That Resulted in Work Absenteeism.day 8, 15 and 29
the Occurrence of Serious Adverse Events (SAE)6 months

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Health Care Workers in Quebec
Health care workers from Quebec
5,183
Health Care Workers in Toronto
Health Care Workers from Toronto
519
Health Care Workers in Halifax
Health Care Workers from Halifax
823
Total6,525

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Day 29 Surveyemail address invalid283
Day 29 Surveyparticipants did not complete the survey2,185
Day 8 Surveyemail address invalid283
Day 8 Surveyparticipants did not complete the survey1,935

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicHealth Care Workers in TorontoHealth Care Workers in HalifaxHealth Care Workers in QuebecTotal
Age Categorical
<=18 years
NA participantsNA participants0 participants0 participants
Age Categorical
>=65 years
NA participantsNA participants1 participants1 participants
Age Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
NA participantsNA participants3152 participants3152 participants
Age ContinuousNA yearsNA years37.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.7
37.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.7
Gender
Female
NA participantsNA participants2310 participants2310 participants
Gender
Male
NA participantsNA participants841 participants841 participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
519 participants823 participants5183 participants6525 participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
383 / 4,984
serious
Total, serious adverse events
35 / 3,064

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants Who Had Experienced a New Health Problem or the Worsening of an Existing Health Condition That Resulted in a Medical Consultation.

Time frame: at day 8, 15 and 29

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Health Care WorkersNumber of Participants Who Had Experienced a New Health Problem or the Worsening of an Existing Health Condition That Resulted in a Medical Consultation.234 participants
Primary

Number of Participants Who Had Experienced a New Health Problem or the Worsening of an Existing Health Condition That Resulted in Work Absenteeism.

Time frame: day 8, 15 and 29

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Health Care WorkersNumber of Participants Who Had Experienced a New Health Problem or the Worsening of an Existing Health Condition That Resulted in Work Absenteeism.374 participants
Primary

the Occurrence of Serious Adverse Events (SAE)

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Health Care Workersthe Occurrence of Serious Adverse Events (SAE)35 participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 26, 2026