Skip to content

Propofol Versus Midazolam+Alfentanil for Sedation During Bronchoscopy: Comparison by Cutaneous Carbon Dioxide Tension

Propofol Versus Midazolam Plus Alfentanil for Sedation During Flexible Bronchoscopy: Respiratory Depression Comparison Inspected by Cutaneous Carbon Dioxide Tension Level

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01289327
Enrollment
115
Registered
2011-02-03
Start date
2010-04-30
Completion date
2011-01-31
Last updated
2011-02-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Lung Disease

Brief summary

Although propofol is a popular agent for sedation during flexible bronchoscopy, some clinicians have raised concerns that it may cause greater respiratory drive reduction than more common drugs. However, this factor is difficult to accurately examine with pulse oximetry. The introduction of a novel device that noninvasively measures carbon dioxide (CO2) levels can help to resolve this controversy. The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety of conscious sedation with midazolam+alfentanil compared to propofol.

Detailed description

Methods: The study group included 115 patients undergoing flexible fiberoptic bronchoscopy(FFB). Patients were randomly assigned by a computer before the procedure to receive sedation with midazolam+alfentanil or propofol. Local anesthesia was induced by application of 2% lidocaine to the oropharynx. Sedation was started with intravenous injection of a bolus of 2-4 mg midazolam and 0.5 mg alfentanil or 20-50 mg propofol. It was maintained with intermittent boluses of 1-3 mg intravenous midazolam or 0.5 mg intravenous alfentanil, according to clinical judgment, or with boluses of 10-20 mg intravenous propofol, administered at short intervals (\ 2 minutes) or according to clinical judgment. In all cases, monitoring included continuous electrocardiography, pulse oximetry, and automated noninvasive blood pressure recordings every 5 minutes. In addition, percutaneous carbon dioxide tension (PcCO2) was measured with a cutaneous digital sensor (Sentec AG, Therwil, Switzerland) that was placed on the earlobe prior to the procedure. It was removed when the patient left the bronchoscopy suite. During the procedure, all patients received supplemental nasal oxygen at 2-5 L min-1. Significant hypoxemia, defined as functional oxygen saturation (SpO2) of 90%, was treated initially with jaw support. If it lasted more than few seconds, a naso/oropharyngeal tube was inserted or supplemental oxygen was delivered via face mask at 10 L min-1. The duration of bronchoscopy was calculated from the administration of sedation until the flexible bronchoscope was removed from the tracheobronchial tree. Percutaneous carbon dioxide tension, blood oxygenation, heart rate, and blood pressure were compared between the groups. A questionnaire evaluating pain and discomfort by Visual Analog Scale was completed by the patient when awake after the procedure.(\ 30 minutes after the end of the procedure

Interventions

DRUGSedation with Propofol or Midazolam+Alfentanil for FFB

Sedation was started with intravenous injection of a bolus of 2-4 mg midazolam and 0.5 mg alfentanil or 20-50 mg propofol. It was maintained with intermittent boluses of 1-3 mg intravenous midazolam or 0.5 mg intravenous alfentanil, according to clinical judgment, or with boluses of 10-20 mg intravenous propofol, administered at short intervals (\ 2 minutes) or according to clinical judgment.

Sponsors

Rabin Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* The study group consisted of patients scheduled for flexible bronchoscopy under local anesthesia with sedation at a tertiary medical center.

Exclusion criteria

* Inability or refusal to provide informed consent, age less than 18 years, bronchoscopy through an artificial airway, and allergy to soya or to one of the sedative drugs.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percutaneous carbon dioxide tensionFrom the beginning of fiberoptic bronchoscopy until 10 minutes after the end of the procedure (average time of fiberoptic bronchoscopy ~ 15 minutes)Continues measurements (record every 4 second)
oxygen saturationFrom the beginning of fiberoptic bronchoscopy until 10 minutes after the end of the procedure (average time of fiberoptic bronchoscopy ~ 15 minutes)Continues measurements (record every 4 second)
heart rateFrom the beginning of fiberoptic bronchoscopy until 10 minutes after the end of the procedure (average time of fiberoptic bronchoscopy ~ 15 minutes)Continues measurements (record every 4 second)
non invasive blood pressureFrom the beginning of fiberoptic bronchoscopy until 10 minutes after the end of the procedure (average time of fiberoptic bronchoscopy ~ 15 minutes)every 5 minutes

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Oxygen supplementationFrom the beginning of fiberoptic bronchoscopy until 10 minutes after the end of the procedure (average time of fiberoptic bronchoscopy ~ 15 minutes)Significant hypoxemia, defined as functional SpO2 of 90%, was treated initially with jaw support. If it lasted more than few seconds, a naso/oropharyngeal tube was inserted or supplemental oxygen was delivered via face mask at 10 L min-1. The percentage of patients who needed supplemental oxygen was evaluated
Naso/oropharyngeal tube insertionFrom the beginning of fiberoptic bronchoscopy until 10 minutes after the end of the procedure (average time of fiberoptic bronchoscopy ~ 15 minutes)Significant hypoxemia, defined as functional SpO2 of 90%, was treated initially with jaw support. If it lasted more than few seconds, a naso/oropharyngeal tube was inserted or supplemental oxygen was delivered via face mask at 10 L min-1 The percentage of patients who needed Naso/oropharyngeal tube insertion was evaluated
A questionnaire evaluating pain and discomfort~30 minutes after the end of the procedureA questionnaire evaluating pain and discomfort by Visual Analog Scale was completed by the patient when awake after the procedure.(\ 30 minutes after the end of the procedure)

Countries

Israel

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026