Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety Evaluation of Alirocumab (SAR236553/REGN727) When Co-administered With High Dose of Atorvastatin in Patients With Primary Hypercholesterolemia

A Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel-group, Placebo-controlled, Fixed Dose/Dose Regimen, Multicenter Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of SAR236553 When Co-administered With 80 mg of Atorvastatin Over 8 Weeks in Patients With Primary Hypercholesterolemia and LDL-cholesterol ≥ 100 mg/dL (≥2.59 mmol/L) on Atorvastatin 10 mg

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01288469
Enrollment
92
Registered
2011-02-02
Start date
2011-01-31
Completion date
2011-09-30
Last updated
2015-09-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hypercholesterolemia

Keywords

10020603

Brief summary

Primary Objective: To evaluate the effect of alirocumab (SAR236553/REGN727) on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels compared with placebo when co-administered with 80 mg of atorvastatin after 8 weeks of treatment in participants with LDL-C ≥ 100mg/dL (≥ 2.59 mmol/L) on atorvastatin 10 mg. Secondary Objectives: * To evaluate the effects of alirocumab on other lipid levels in comparison with placebo, when co-administered with 80 mg of atorvastatin after 8 weeks of treatment. * To evaluate the efficacy of alirocumab when co-administered with a high dose of atorvastatin (80 mg) versus atorvastatin 10 mg. * To evaluate the safety and tolerability of alirocumab when co-administered with 2 different doses of atorvastatin. * To evaluate the development of anti-alirocumab antibodies. * To evaluate the pharmacokinetics of alirocumab.

Detailed description

The duration of study participation depended on the status of the patient at screening: * For participants receiving atorvastatin 10 mg at stable dose for at least 6 weeks prior to screening, the study participation was to be approximately 17 weeks including a screening period of 1 week, a double-blind treatment period of 8 weeks and a follow-up period of 8 weeks. * For participants receiving a lipid lowering treatment other than atorvastatin/ or not at stable dose of atorvastatin 10 mg for at least 6 weeks prior to screening, or drug naive participants, the study participation was to be approximately 23 weeks with a screening period of 1 week, a run-in treatment period with atorvastatin 10 mg of 6 weeks, a double-blind treatment period of 8 weeks and a follow-up period of 8 weeks.

Interventions

DRUGAlirocumab

One subcutaneous (SC) injection in the abdomen only.

One SC injection in the abdomen only.

DRUGAtorvastatin

Over-encapsulated tablet orally once daily in the evening with dinner.

One over-encapsulated tablet of placebo for atorvastatin orally once daily in the evening with dinner.

Sponsors

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Sanofi
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

\- Participants receiving a lipid-lowering treatment other than atorvastatin/ or not at stable dose of atorvastatin 10 mg for at least 6 weeks prior to screening, or drug naive participants with primary hypercholesterolemia if they are likely to have low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) ≥ 100 mg/dL (≥ 2.59 mmol/L) at the end of the 6-week run-in treatment period on atorvastatin therapy OR \- Participants with primary hypercholesterolemia treated with stable dose of atorvastatin 10 mg for at least 6 weeks prior to screening and likely to have low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) ≥ 100 mg/dL (≥ 2.59 mmol/L) at the screening visit.

Exclusion criteria

1. LDL-C \< 100 mg/dL (\< 2.59 mmol/L) at Week -1 (V1): * After the run-in period on atorvastatin 10 mg for participants receiving a lipid lowering treatment other than atorvastatin/ or not at stable dose of atorvastatin 10 mg for at least 6 weeks prior to the screening period, or drug naive participants. OR * At the first visit for participants who are being treated with atorvastatin 10 mg at stable dose for at least 6 weeks prior to screening visit. 2. Participants not previously instructed on a cholesterol-lowering diet. 3. Participants with type 1 diabetes. 4. Participants with type 2 diabetes treated with insulin. 5. Participants with type 2 diabetes and with an HbA1c ≥ 8.5% at screening visit (considered poorly controlled). 6. Laboratory findings measured before randomization: * Triglycerides (TG) \> 350 mg/dL (\> 3.95 mmol/L) at screening visit. * Positive serum or urine pregnancy test in females of childbearing potential. 7. Pregnant or breast-feeding women. 8. Women of childbearing potential with no effective contraceptive method. The above information is not intended to contain all considerations relevant to a Participant's potential participation in a clinical trial.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent Change From Baseline in Calculated LDL-C at Week 8 - On-treatment AnalysisFrom Baseline to Week 8 (LOCF)Calculated LDL-C values were obtained using the Friedewald formula. Baseline adjusted least squares (LS) means and standard errors were estimated using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model including available post-baseline data on treatment from first investigational product (IP) injection up to 21 days after last IP injection (on-treatment analysis). Missing Week 8 data were imputed by last observation carried forward \[LOCF\] method.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Absolute Change From Baseline in Calculated LDL-C (mg/dL) at Week 8 - On-treatment AnalysisFrom baseline to Week 8 (LOCF)Adjusted LS means and standard errors were estimated using the same ANCOVA model as for primary endpoint.
Percentage of Participants Achieving Calculated LDL-C <100 mg/dL (2.59 mmol/L) and < 70 mg/dL (1.81 mmol/L) at Week 8 - On-treatment AnalysisWeek 8 (LOCF)
Absolute Change From Baseline in Calculated LDL-C (mmol/L) at Week 8 - On-treatment AnalysisFrom baseline to Week 8 (LOCF)Adjusted LS means and standard errors were estimated using the same ANCOVA model as for primary endpoint.
Percent Change From Baseline in High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) at Week 8 - On-treatment AnalysisFrom Baseline to Week 8 (LOCF)Adjusted LS means and standard errors were estimated using the same ANCOVA model as for primary endpoint.
Absolute Change in the Ratio Apolipoprotein B/Apolipoprotein A-1 (ApoB/ApoA-1) From Baseline to Week 8 - On-treatment AnalysisFrom Baseline to Week 8 (LOCF)Adjusted LS means and standard errors were estimated using the same ANCOVA as for primary endpoint.
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol, Fasting Triglycerides, Non-high-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C), Apolipoprotein B (Apo-B) and Lipoprotein(a) at Week 8 - On-treatment AnalysisFrom baseline to Week 8 (LOCF)Since the assumptions of normal distribution and equality of variances were not verified for the lipid parameters, percent changes were expressed as median (interquartile range).

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The study was conducted at 20 centers in the United States of America. Overall, 214 participants were screened between January 2011 and April 2011. Screen failures were mainly due to exclusion criteria met.

Pre-assignment details

Assignment to treatment arms was done centrally using an Interactive Voice/Web Response System in a 1:1:1 ratio after confirmation of selection criteria. 92 participants were randomized.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo + Atorvastatin 80 mg
Placebo (for alirocumab) SC injection Q2W in combination with atorvastatin 80 mg orally once daily for 8 weeks.
31
Alirocumab + Atorvastatin 10 mg
Alirocumab 150 mg SC injection Q2W in combination with atorvastatin 10 mg orally once daily for 8 weeks.
31
Alirocumab + Atorvastatin 80 mg
Alirocumab 150 mg SC injection Q2W in combination with atorvastatin 80 mg orally once daily for 8 weeks.
30
Total92

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyAdverse Event411
Overall StudyConsent withdrawn by subject111
Overall StudyExclusion criteria finally met100
Overall StudyParticipant Moved100
Overall StudyPoor compliance to protocol010

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlacebo + Atorvastatin 80 mgAlirocumab + Atorvastatin 10 mgAlirocumab + Atorvastatin 80 mgTotal
Age, Continuous55.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.3
57.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10
57.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.3
56.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.8
LDL-C in mg/dL121.2 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.1
119.7 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.5
126.9 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 21.8
122.6 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.7
Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) in mmol/L3.138 mmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.469
3.101 mmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.402
3.288 mmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.564
3.174 mmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.484
Sex: Female, Male
Female
18 Participants17 Participants20 Participants55 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
13 Participants14 Participants10 Participants37 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
13 / 314 / 3110 / 30
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 310 / 311 / 30

Outcome results

Primary

Percent Change From Baseline in Calculated LDL-C at Week 8 - On-treatment Analysis

Calculated LDL-C values were obtained using the Friedewald formula. Baseline adjusted least squares (LS) means and standard errors were estimated using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model including available post-baseline data on treatment from first investigational product (IP) injection up to 21 days after last IP injection (on-treatment analysis). Missing Week 8 data were imputed by last observation carried forward \[LOCF\] method.

Time frame: From Baseline to Week 8 (LOCF)

Population: Modified Intent-To-Treat (mITT) population: all randomized and treated participants with one baseline and at least one post-baseline calculated LDL-C value on-treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo + Atorvastatin 80 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Calculated LDL-C at Week 8 - On-treatment Analysis-17.3 percent changeStandard Error 3.5
Alirocumab + Atorvastatin 10 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Calculated LDL-C at Week 8 - On-treatment Analysis-66.2 percent changeStandard Error 3.5
Alirocumab + Atorvastatin 80 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Calculated LDL-C at Week 8 - On-treatment Analysis-73.2 percent changeStandard Error 3.5
Comparison: Throughout the ANCOVA model, the Alirocumab + atorvastatin 80 mg group was compared to the placebo + atorvastatin 80 mg group using appropriate contrast and the 95% confidence interval (CI) of the difference was provided.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-65.62, -46.03]ANCOVA
Secondary

Absolute Change From Baseline in Calculated LDL-C (mg/dL) at Week 8 - On-treatment Analysis

Adjusted LS means and standard errors were estimated using the same ANCOVA model as for primary endpoint.

Time frame: From baseline to Week 8 (LOCF)

Population: mITT population.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo + Atorvastatin 80 mgAbsolute Change From Baseline in Calculated LDL-C (mg/dL) at Week 8 - On-treatment Analysis-21.5 mg/dLStandard Error 4.2
Alirocumab + Atorvastatin 10 mgAbsolute Change From Baseline in Calculated LDL-C (mg/dL) at Week 8 - On-treatment Analysis-80.7 mg/dLStandard Error 4.2
Alirocumab + Atorvastatin 80 mgAbsolute Change From Baseline in Calculated LDL-C (mg/dL) at Week 8 - On-treatment Analysis-89.3 mg/dLStandard Error 4.1
Secondary

Absolute Change From Baseline in Calculated LDL-C (mmol/L) at Week 8 - On-treatment Analysis

Adjusted LS means and standard errors were estimated using the same ANCOVA model as for primary endpoint.

Time frame: From baseline to Week 8 (LOCF)

Population: mITT population.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo + Atorvastatin 80 mgAbsolute Change From Baseline in Calculated LDL-C (mmol/L) at Week 8 - On-treatment Analysis-0.56 mmol/LStandard Error 0.11
Alirocumab + Atorvastatin 10 mgAbsolute Change From Baseline in Calculated LDL-C (mmol/L) at Week 8 - On-treatment Analysis-2.09 mmol/LStandard Error 0.11
Alirocumab + Atorvastatin 80 mgAbsolute Change From Baseline in Calculated LDL-C (mmol/L) at Week 8 - On-treatment Analysis-2.31 mmol/LStandard Error 0.11
Secondary

Absolute Change in the Ratio Apolipoprotein B/Apolipoprotein A-1 (ApoB/ApoA-1) From Baseline to Week 8 - On-treatment Analysis

Adjusted LS means and standard errors were estimated using the same ANCOVA as for primary endpoint.

Time frame: From Baseline to Week 8 (LOCF)

Population: Participants of the mITT population with one baseline and at least one post-baseline on treatment value for lipid parameter analyzed

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Placebo + Atorvastatin 80 mgAbsolute Change in the Ratio Apolipoprotein B/Apolipoprotein A-1 (ApoB/ApoA-1) From Baseline to Week 8 - On-treatment Analysis-0.03 ratio
Alirocumab + Atorvastatin 10 mgAbsolute Change in the Ratio Apolipoprotein B/Apolipoprotein A-1 (ApoB/ApoA-1) From Baseline to Week 8 - On-treatment Analysis-0.34 ratio
Alirocumab + Atorvastatin 80 mgAbsolute Change in the Ratio Apolipoprotein B/Apolipoprotein A-1 (ApoB/ApoA-1) From Baseline to Week 8 - On-treatment Analysis-0.36 ratio
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving Calculated LDL-C <100 mg/dL (2.59 mmol/L) and < 70 mg/dL (1.81 mmol/L) at Week 8 - On-treatment Analysis

Time frame: Week 8 (LOCF)

Population: mITT population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Placebo + Atorvastatin 80 mgPercentage of Participants Achieving Calculated LDL-C <100 mg/dL (2.59 mmol/L) and < 70 mg/dL (1.81 mmol/L) at Week 8 - On-treatment AnalysisLDL-C < 100 mg/dL (2.59 mmol/L)51.7 percentage of participants
Placebo + Atorvastatin 80 mgPercentage of Participants Achieving Calculated LDL-C <100 mg/dL (2.59 mmol/L) and < 70 mg/dL (1.81 mmol/L) at Week 8 - On-treatment AnalysisLDL-C < 70 mg/dL (1.81 mmol/L)17.2 percentage of participants
Alirocumab + Atorvastatin 10 mgPercentage of Participants Achieving Calculated LDL-C <100 mg/dL (2.59 mmol/L) and < 70 mg/dL (1.81 mmol/L) at Week 8 - On-treatment AnalysisLDL-C < 100 mg/dL (2.59 mmol/L)100.0 percentage of participants
Alirocumab + Atorvastatin 10 mgPercentage of Participants Achieving Calculated LDL-C <100 mg/dL (2.59 mmol/L) and < 70 mg/dL (1.81 mmol/L) at Week 8 - On-treatment AnalysisLDL-C < 70 mg/dL (1.81 mmol/L)96.6 percentage of participants
Alirocumab + Atorvastatin 80 mgPercentage of Participants Achieving Calculated LDL-C <100 mg/dL (2.59 mmol/L) and < 70 mg/dL (1.81 mmol/L) at Week 8 - On-treatment AnalysisLDL-C < 100 mg/dL (2.59 mmol/L)100.0 percentage of participants
Alirocumab + Atorvastatin 80 mgPercentage of Participants Achieving Calculated LDL-C <100 mg/dL (2.59 mmol/L) and < 70 mg/dL (1.81 mmol/L) at Week 8 - On-treatment AnalysisLDL-C < 70 mg/dL (1.81 mmol/L)90.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) at Week 8 - On-treatment Analysis

Adjusted LS means and standard errors were estimated using the same ANCOVA model as for primary endpoint.

Time frame: From Baseline to Week 8 (LOCF)

Population: Participants of the mITT population with one baseline and at least one post-baseline on treatment HDL-C value.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo + Atorvastatin 80 mgPercent Change From Baseline in High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) at Week 8 - On-treatment Analysis-3.6 percent changeStandard Error 2.3
Alirocumab + Atorvastatin 10 mgPercent Change From Baseline in High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) at Week 8 - On-treatment Analysis2.6 percent changeStandard Error 2.3
Alirocumab + Atorvastatin 80 mgPercent Change From Baseline in High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) at Week 8 - On-treatment Analysis5.8 percent changeStandard Error 2.3
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol, Fasting Triglycerides, Non-high-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C), Apolipoprotein B (Apo-B) and Lipoprotein(a) at Week 8 - On-treatment Analysis

Since the assumptions of normal distribution and equality of variances were not verified for the lipid parameters, percent changes were expressed as median (interquartile range).

Time frame: From baseline to Week 8 (LOCF)

Population: Participants of the mITT population with one baseline and at least one post-baseline on treatment value for lipid parameters analyzed. Here, n signifies number of participants analysed for each lipid parameter.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Placebo + Atorvastatin 80 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol, Fasting Triglycerides, Non-high-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C), Apolipoprotein B (Apo-B) and Lipoprotein(a) at Week 8 - On-treatment AnalysisLipoprotein(a) (n= 29, 28, 29)-2.7 percent change
Placebo + Atorvastatin 80 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol, Fasting Triglycerides, Non-high-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C), Apolipoprotein B (Apo-B) and Lipoprotein(a) at Week 8 - On-treatment AnalysisNon-HDL-C (n= 29, 29, 30)-22.3 percent change
Placebo + Atorvastatin 80 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol, Fasting Triglycerides, Non-high-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C), Apolipoprotein B (Apo-B) and Lipoprotein(a) at Week 8 - On-treatment AnalysisFasting Triglycerides (n=29, 29, 30)-11.9 percent change
Placebo + Atorvastatin 80 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol, Fasting Triglycerides, Non-high-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C), Apolipoprotein B (Apo-B) and Lipoprotein(a) at Week 8 - On-treatment AnalysisApo-B (n = 29, 28, 29)-12.0 percent change
Placebo + Atorvastatin 80 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol, Fasting Triglycerides, Non-high-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C), Apolipoprotein B (Apo-B) and Lipoprotein(a) at Week 8 - On-treatment AnalysisTotal Cholesterol (n=29, 29, 30)-16.6 percent change
Alirocumab + Atorvastatin 10 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol, Fasting Triglycerides, Non-high-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C), Apolipoprotein B (Apo-B) and Lipoprotein(a) at Week 8 - On-treatment AnalysisApo-B (n = 29, 28, 29)-54.4 percent change
Alirocumab + Atorvastatin 10 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol, Fasting Triglycerides, Non-high-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C), Apolipoprotein B (Apo-B) and Lipoprotein(a) at Week 8 - On-treatment AnalysisLipoprotein(a) (n= 29, 28, 29)-34.7 percent change
Alirocumab + Atorvastatin 10 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol, Fasting Triglycerides, Non-high-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C), Apolipoprotein B (Apo-B) and Lipoprotein(a) at Week 8 - On-treatment AnalysisTotal Cholesterol (n=29, 29, 30)-40.5 percent change
Alirocumab + Atorvastatin 10 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol, Fasting Triglycerides, Non-high-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C), Apolipoprotein B (Apo-B) and Lipoprotein(a) at Week 8 - On-treatment AnalysisFasting Triglycerides (n=29, 29, 30)-4.0 percent change
Alirocumab + Atorvastatin 10 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol, Fasting Triglycerides, Non-high-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C), Apolipoprotein B (Apo-B) and Lipoprotein(a) at Week 8 - On-treatment AnalysisNon-HDL-C (n= 29, 29, 30)-58.3 percent change
Alirocumab + Atorvastatin 80 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol, Fasting Triglycerides, Non-high-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C), Apolipoprotein B (Apo-B) and Lipoprotein(a) at Week 8 - On-treatment AnalysisTotal Cholesterol (n=29, 29, 30)-47.2 percent change
Alirocumab + Atorvastatin 80 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol, Fasting Triglycerides, Non-high-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C), Apolipoprotein B (Apo-B) and Lipoprotein(a) at Week 8 - On-treatment AnalysisApo-B (n = 29, 28, 29)-58.0 percent change
Alirocumab + Atorvastatin 80 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol, Fasting Triglycerides, Non-high-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C), Apolipoprotein B (Apo-B) and Lipoprotein(a) at Week 8 - On-treatment AnalysisNon-HDL-C (n= 29, 29, 30)-63.9 percent change
Alirocumab + Atorvastatin 80 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol, Fasting Triglycerides, Non-high-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C), Apolipoprotein B (Apo-B) and Lipoprotein(a) at Week 8 - On-treatment AnalysisLipoprotein(a) (n= 29, 28, 29)-31.0 percent change
Alirocumab + Atorvastatin 80 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol, Fasting Triglycerides, Non-high-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C), Apolipoprotein B (Apo-B) and Lipoprotein(a) at Week 8 - On-treatment AnalysisFasting Triglycerides (n=29, 29, 30)-24.7 percent change

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 25, 2026