Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety Evaluation of Alirocumab (SAR236553/REGN727) in Patients With Primary Hypercholesterolemia on Stable Atorvastatin Therapy

A Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel-group, Placebo-controlled, Multicenter Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Five Doses and Two Dose Regimens of SAR236553 Over 12 Weeks in Patients With Primary Hypercholesterolemia and LDL-cholesterol ≥ 100 mg/dL (≥ 2.59 mmol/L) on Ongoing Stable Atorvastatin Therapy

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01288443
Enrollment
183
Registered
2011-02-02
Start date
2011-01-31
Completion date
2011-12-31
Last updated
2015-09-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hypercholesterolemia

Brief summary

Primary Objective: * To evaluate the effect of alirocumab (SAR236553/REGN727) on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels after 12 weeks of treatment in comparison with placebo in participants with LDL-C ≥ 100 mg/dL (≥ 2.59 mmol/L) on ongoing stable atorvastatin therapy. Secondary Objectives: * To evaluate the effects of alirocumab on other lipid levels after 12 weeks of treatment in comparison with placebo * To evaluate the safety and tolerability of alirocumab * To evaluate the development of anti-alirocumab antibodies * To evaluate the pharmacokinetics of alirocumab

Detailed description

The duration of study participation depended on the status of the participant at screening: * For participants receiving atorvastatin 10 mg, 20 mg, or 40 mg at a stable dose for at least 6 weeks prior to screening, the study participation was to be approximately 21 weeks including a screening period of 1 week, a double-blind treatment period of 12 weeks and a follow-up period of 8 weeks. * For participants receiving a lipid-lowering treatment other than atorvastatin or not at stable dose of atorvastatin 10 mg, 20 mg, or 40 mg for at least 6 weeks prior to screening, or drug naive participants, the study participation was to be approximately 27 weeks including a screening period of 1 week, a run-in treatment period with atorvastatin 10 mg, 20 mg, or 40 mg at a stable dose of 6 weeks, a double-blind treatment period of 12 weeks, and a follow-up period of 8 weeks.

Interventions

DRUGAlirocumab

Two SC injections in the abdomen only.

Two subcutaneous (SC) injections in the abdomen only.

DRUGAtorvastatin

Orally once daily at a stable dose of 10 mg, 20 mg, or 40 mg as background therapy.

Sponsors

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Sanofi
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Participants with primary hypercholesterolemia receiving a lipid-lowering treatment other than atorvastatin or not at stable dose of atorvastatin 10 mg, 20 mg, or 40 mg for at least 6 weeks prior to screening period or drug naive participants if they are likely to have low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) ≥ 100 mg/dL (≥ 2.59 mmol/L) at the end of the 6-week run-in treatment period on atorvastatin therapy OR * Participants with primary hypercholesterolemia treated with atorvastatin at stable dose of 10 mg, 20 mg, or 40 mg for at least 6 weeks prior to screening period and likely to have LDL-C ≥ 100 mg/dL (≥ 2.59 mmol/L) at the screening visit

Exclusion criteria

1. LDL-C \< 100 mg/dL (\< 2.59 mmol/L): * After the run-in period on atorvastatin (10 mg, 20 mg, or 40 mg) for participants receiving a lipid-lowering treatment other than atorvastatin or not at stable dose of atorvastatin 10 mg, 20 mg, or 40 mg for at least 6 weeks prior to the screening, or drug naive participant OR * At the first visit for participants who were being treated with stable dose of atorvastatin (10 mg, 20 mg, or 40 mg) for at least 6 weeks prior to screening 2. Participants not previously instructed on a cholesterol-lowering diet 3. Participants with type 1 diabetes 4. Participants with type 2 diabetes treated with insulin 5. Participants with type 2 diabetes and with an glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) ≥ 8.5% at screening visit (considered poorly controlled) 6. Laboratory findings measured before randomization: * Triglycerides (TG) \> 350 mg/dL (\> 3.95 mmol/L) at screening visit * Positive serum or urine pregnancy test in females of childbearing potential 7. Pregnant or breast-feeding women 8. Women of childbearing potential with no effective contraceptive method The above information is not intended to contain all considerations relevant to a participant's potential participation in a clinical trial.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent Change From Baseline in Calculated LDL-C at Week 12 - On-Treatment AnalysisBaseline to Week 12 (LOCF)Calculated LDL-C values were obtained using the Friedewald formula. Baseline adjusted least squares (LS) means and standard errors were estimated using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model including available post-baseline data on treatment from first study drug injection up to 21 days after last study drug injection (on-treatment analysis). Missing Week 12 data were imputed by last observation carried forward \[LOCF\] method.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Absolute Change From Baseline in Calculated LDL-C (mg/dL) at Week 12 - On-Treatment AnalysisBaseline to Week 12 (LOCF)Adjusted LS means and standard errors were estimated using the same ANCOVA model as for primary endpoint.
Percentage of Participants Achieving Calculated LDL-C <100 mg/dL (2.59 mmol/L) and <70 mg/dL (1.81 mmol/L) at Week 12 - On-Treatment AnalysisWeek 12 (LOCF)
Absolute Change From Baseline in Calculated LDL-C (mmol/L) at Week 12 - On-Treatment AnalysisBaseline to Week 12 (LOCF)Adjusted LS means and standard errors were estimated using the same ANCOVA model as for primary endpoint.
Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting Triglycerides and Lipoprotein(a) at Week 12 - On-Treatment AnalysisBaseline to Week 12 (LOCF)Since the assumptions of normal distribution and equality of variances were not verified for the lipid parameters, percent changes were expressed as median (inter-quartile range).
Absolute Change in the Ratio Apolipoprotein B/Apolipoprotein A-1 (ApoB/ApoA-1) From Baseline to Week 12 - On-Treatment AnalysisBaseline to Week 12 (LOCF)Adjusted LS mean and standard errors were estimated using the same ANCOVA as for primary endpoint.
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol, High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C), Non-HDL-C and Apolipoprotein B (Apo-B) at Week 12 - On-Treatment AnalysisBaseline to Week 12 (LOCF)Adjusted LS means and standard errors were estimated using the same ANCOVA model as for primary endpoint.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The study was conducted at 38 centers in the United States of America. Overall, 514 participants were screened between January 2011 and August 2011, 331 of whom were screen failures and screen failures were mainly due to exclusion criteria met.

Pre-assignment details

Randomization was stratified according to atorvastatin dose. Assignment to treatment arms was done centrally using an Interactive Voice/Web Response System in a 1:1:1:1:1:1 ratio after confirmation of selection criteria. 183 participants were randomized.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
Placebo (for alirocumab) Q2W for 12-weeks in combination with atorvastatin stable dose.
31
Alirocumab 50 mg Q2W
Alirocumab 50 mg Q2W for 12-weeks in combination with atorvastatin stable dose.
30
Alirocumab 100 mg Q2W
Alirocumab 100 mg Q2W for 12-weeks in combination with atorvastatin stable dose.
31
Alirocumab 150 mg Q2W
Alirocumab 150 mg Q2W for 12-weeks in combination with atorvastatin stable dose.
31
Alirocumab 200 mg Q4W
Alirocumab 200 mg Q4W and alternating placebo (for alirocumab) Q2W for 12-weeks in combination with atorvastatin stable dose.
30
Alirocumab 300 mg Q4W
Alirocumab 300 mg Q4W and alternating placebo (for alirocumab) Q2W for 12-weeks in combination with atorvastatin stable dose.
30
Total183

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004FG005
Overall StudyAdverse Event001131
Overall StudyConsent withdrawn by Participant000001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up010000
Overall StudyOther than above000210
Overall StudyParticipant Moved000121
Overall StudyPoor compliance to protocol000001
Overall StudyStudy drug auto-injector administration000011

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlaceboAlirocumab 50 mg Q2WAlirocumab 100 mg Q2WAlirocumab 150 mg Q2WAlirocumab 200 mg Q4WAlirocumab 300 mg Q4WTotal
Age, Continuous53.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.5
58.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.1
58.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.2
59.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.1
54.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.8
55.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.1
56.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10
LDL-C in mg/dL130.2 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 27.3
123.2 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 27.9
127.0 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 30.4
124.7 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 26.9
127.2 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.6
131.6 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 24.8
127.3 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 26.2
Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) in mmol/L3.4 mmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.7
3.2 mmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.7
3.3 mmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.8
3.2 mmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.7
3.3 mmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.5
3.4 mmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.6
3.3 mmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.7
Sex: Female, Male
Female
15 Participants13 Participants18 Participants21 Participants13 Participants16 Participants96 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
16 Participants17 Participants13 Participants10 Participants17 Participants14 Participants87 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
10 / 3114 / 3014 / 3112 / 3112 / 3110 / 28
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 310 / 301 / 310 / 311 / 311 / 28

Outcome results

Primary

Percent Change From Baseline in Calculated LDL-C at Week 12 - On-Treatment Analysis

Calculated LDL-C values were obtained using the Friedewald formula. Baseline adjusted least squares (LS) means and standard errors were estimated using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model including available post-baseline data on treatment from first study drug injection up to 21 days after last study drug injection (on-treatment analysis). Missing Week 12 data were imputed by last observation carried forward \[LOCF\] method.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 12 (LOCF)

Population: Modified Intent-To-Treat (mITT) population included all randomized participants with one baseline and at least one post baseline on-treatment calculated LDL-C.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Calculated LDL-C at Week 12 - On-Treatment Analysis-5.1 percent changeStandard Error 3.1
Alirocumab 50 mg Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in Calculated LDL-C at Week 12 - On-Treatment Analysis-39.6 percent changeStandard Error 3.2
Alirocumab 100 mg Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in Calculated LDL-C at Week 12 - On-Treatment Analysis-64.2 percent changeStandard Error 3.1
Alirocumab 150 mg Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in Calculated LDL-C at Week 12 - On-Treatment Analysis-72.4 percent changeStandard Error 3.2
Alirocumab 200 mg Q4WPercent Change From Baseline in Calculated LDL-C at Week 12 - On-Treatment Analysis-43.2 percent changeStandard Error 3.3
Alirocumab 300 mg Q4WPercent Change From Baseline in Calculated LDL-C at Week 12 - On-Treatment Analysis-47.7 percent changeStandard Error 3.2
Comparison: Each treatment group was compared to placebo using ANCOVA-derived contrasts.~A hierarchical testing procedure was applied to ensure strong control of overall Type-I error rate at 0.05 level. Order was following:~1. Alirocumab 150 mg Q2W versus placebo~2. Alirocumab 300 mg Q4W versus placebo~3. Alirocumab 100 mg Q2W versus placebo~4. Alirocumab 200 mg Q4W versus placebo~5. Alirocumab 50 mg Q2W versus placebo~Testing continued only when high-order test was statistically significant at 5% levelp-value: <0.0001ANCOVA
p-value: <0.0001ANCOVA
p-value: <0.0001ANCOVA
p-value: <0.0001ANCOVA
p-value: <0.0001ANCOVA
Secondary

Absolute Change From Baseline in Calculated LDL-C (mg/dL) at Week 12 - On-Treatment Analysis

Adjusted LS means and standard errors were estimated using the same ANCOVA model as for primary endpoint.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 12 (LOCF)

Population: mITT population.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboAbsolute Change From Baseline in Calculated LDL-C (mg/dL) at Week 12 - On-Treatment Analysis-7.6 mg/dLStandard Error 3.9
Alirocumab 50 mg Q2WAbsolute Change From Baseline in Calculated LDL-C (mg/dL) at Week 12 - On-Treatment Analysis-53.0 mg/dLStandard Error 4
Alirocumab 100 mg Q2WAbsolute Change From Baseline in Calculated LDL-C (mg/dL) at Week 12 - On-Treatment Analysis-81.2 mg/dLStandard Error 3.9
Alirocumab 150 mg Q2WAbsolute Change From Baseline in Calculated LDL-C (mg/dL) at Week 12 - On-Treatment Analysis-92.0 mg/dLStandard Error 4
Alirocumab 200 mg Q4WAbsolute Change From Baseline in Calculated LDL-C (mg/dL) at Week 12 - On-Treatment Analysis-56.4 mg/dLStandard Error 4.1
Alirocumab 300 mg Q4WAbsolute Change From Baseline in Calculated LDL-C (mg/dL) at Week 12 - On-Treatment Analysis-62.5 mg/dLStandard Error 4
Secondary

Absolute Change From Baseline in Calculated LDL-C (mmol/L) at Week 12 - On-Treatment Analysis

Adjusted LS means and standard errors were estimated using the same ANCOVA model as for primary endpoint.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 12 (LOCF)

Population: mITT population.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboAbsolute Change From Baseline in Calculated LDL-C (mmol/L) at Week 12 - On-Treatment Analysis-0.20 mmol/LStandard Error 0.1
Alirocumab 50 mg Q2WAbsolute Change From Baseline in Calculated LDL-C (mmol/L) at Week 12 - On-Treatment Analysis-1.37 mmol/LStandard Error 0.1
Alirocumab 100 mg Q2WAbsolute Change From Baseline in Calculated LDL-C (mmol/L) at Week 12 - On-Treatment Analysis-2.10 mmol/LStandard Error 0.1
Alirocumab 150 mg Q2WAbsolute Change From Baseline in Calculated LDL-C (mmol/L) at Week 12 - On-Treatment Analysis-2.38 mmol/LStandard Error 0.1
Alirocumab 200 mg Q4WAbsolute Change From Baseline in Calculated LDL-C (mmol/L) at Week 12 - On-Treatment Analysis-1.46 mmol/LStandard Error 0.11
Alirocumab 300 mg Q4WAbsolute Change From Baseline in Calculated LDL-C (mmol/L) at Week 12 - On-Treatment Analysis-1.62 mmol/LStandard Error 0.1
Secondary

Absolute Change in the Ratio Apolipoprotein B/Apolipoprotein A-1 (ApoB/ApoA-1) From Baseline to Week 12 - On-Treatment Analysis

Adjusted LS mean and standard errors were estimated using the same ANCOVA as for primary endpoint.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 12 (LOCF)

Population: Participants of the mITT population with one baseline and at least one post-baseline on-treatment value for ApoB/ApoA-1 ratio analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboAbsolute Change in the Ratio Apolipoprotein B/Apolipoprotein A-1 (ApoB/ApoA-1) From Baseline to Week 12 - On-Treatment Analysis0.05 ratioStandard Error 0.03
Alirocumab 50 mg Q2WAbsolute Change in the Ratio Apolipoprotein B/Apolipoprotein A-1 (ApoB/ApoA-1) From Baseline to Week 12 - On-Treatment Analysis-0.23 ratioStandard Error 0.03
Alirocumab 100 mg Q2WAbsolute Change in the Ratio Apolipoprotein B/Apolipoprotein A-1 (ApoB/ApoA-1) From Baseline to Week 12 - On-Treatment Analysis-0.35 ratioStandard Error 0.03
Alirocumab 150 mg Q2WAbsolute Change in the Ratio Apolipoprotein B/Apolipoprotein A-1 (ApoB/ApoA-1) From Baseline to Week 12 - On-Treatment Analysis-0.42 ratioStandard Error 0.03
Alirocumab 200 mg Q4WAbsolute Change in the Ratio Apolipoprotein B/Apolipoprotein A-1 (ApoB/ApoA-1) From Baseline to Week 12 - On-Treatment Analysis-0.23 ratioStandard Error 0.03
Alirocumab 300 mg Q4WAbsolute Change in the Ratio Apolipoprotein B/Apolipoprotein A-1 (ApoB/ApoA-1) From Baseline to Week 12 - On-Treatment Analysis-0.29 ratioStandard Error 0.03
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving Calculated LDL-C <100 mg/dL (2.59 mmol/L) and <70 mg/dL (1.81 mmol/L) at Week 12 - On-Treatment Analysis

Time frame: Week 12 (LOCF)

Population: mITT population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving Calculated LDL-C <100 mg/dL (2.59 mmol/L) and <70 mg/dL (1.81 mmol/L) at Week 12 - On-Treatment AnalysisLDL-C <100 mg/dL (2.59 mmol/L)16.1 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving Calculated LDL-C <100 mg/dL (2.59 mmol/L) and <70 mg/dL (1.81 mmol/L) at Week 12 - On-Treatment AnalysisLDL-C <70 mg/dL (1.81 mmol/L)3.2 percentage of participants
Alirocumab 50 mg Q2WPercentage of Participants Achieving Calculated LDL-C <100 mg/dL (2.59 mmol/L) and <70 mg/dL (1.81 mmol/L) at Week 12 - On-Treatment AnalysisLDL-C <100 mg/dL (2.59 mmol/L)93.3 percentage of participants
Alirocumab 50 mg Q2WPercentage of Participants Achieving Calculated LDL-C <100 mg/dL (2.59 mmol/L) and <70 mg/dL (1.81 mmol/L) at Week 12 - On-Treatment AnalysisLDL-C <70 mg/dL (1.81 mmol/L)46.7 percentage of participants
Alirocumab 100 mg Q2WPercentage of Participants Achieving Calculated LDL-C <100 mg/dL (2.59 mmol/L) and <70 mg/dL (1.81 mmol/L) at Week 12 - On-Treatment AnalysisLDL-C <100 mg/dL (2.59 mmol/L)96.8 percentage of participants
Alirocumab 100 mg Q2WPercentage of Participants Achieving Calculated LDL-C <100 mg/dL (2.59 mmol/L) and <70 mg/dL (1.81 mmol/L) at Week 12 - On-Treatment AnalysisLDL-C <70 mg/dL (1.81 mmol/L)83.9 percentage of participants
Alirocumab 150 mg Q2WPercentage of Participants Achieving Calculated LDL-C <100 mg/dL (2.59 mmol/L) and <70 mg/dL (1.81 mmol/L) at Week 12 - On-Treatment AnalysisLDL-C <100 mg/dL (2.59 mmol/L)100.0 percentage of participants
Alirocumab 150 mg Q2WPercentage of Participants Achieving Calculated LDL-C <100 mg/dL (2.59 mmol/L) and <70 mg/dL (1.81 mmol/L) at Week 12 - On-Treatment AnalysisLDL-C <70 mg/dL (1.81 mmol/L)100.0 percentage of participants
Alirocumab 200 mg Q4WPercentage of Participants Achieving Calculated LDL-C <100 mg/dL (2.59 mmol/L) and <70 mg/dL (1.81 mmol/L) at Week 12 - On-Treatment AnalysisLDL-C <100 mg/dL (2.59 mmol/L)89.3 percentage of participants
Alirocumab 200 mg Q4WPercentage of Participants Achieving Calculated LDL-C <100 mg/dL (2.59 mmol/L) and <70 mg/dL (1.81 mmol/L) at Week 12 - On-Treatment AnalysisLDL-C <70 mg/dL (1.81 mmol/L)46.4 percentage of participants
Alirocumab 300 mg Q4WPercentage of Participants Achieving Calculated LDL-C <100 mg/dL (2.59 mmol/L) and <70 mg/dL (1.81 mmol/L) at Week 12 - On-Treatment AnalysisLDL-C <100 mg/dL (2.59 mmol/L)96.7 percentage of participants
Alirocumab 300 mg Q4WPercentage of Participants Achieving Calculated LDL-C <100 mg/dL (2.59 mmol/L) and <70 mg/dL (1.81 mmol/L) at Week 12 - On-Treatment AnalysisLDL-C <70 mg/dL (1.81 mmol/L)56.7 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting Triglycerides and Lipoprotein(a) at Week 12 - On-Treatment Analysis

Since the assumptions of normal distribution and equality of variances were not verified for the lipid parameters, percent changes were expressed as median (inter-quartile range).

Time frame: Baseline to Week 12 (LOCF)

Population: Participants of the mITT population with one baseline and at least one post-baseline on-treatment value for lipid parameters analyzed. Here, n signifies number of participants analysed for each lipid parameter.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Fasting Triglycerides and Lipoprotein(a) at Week 12 - On-Treatment AnalysisFasting Triglycerides (n= 31, 30, 31, 29, 28, 30)9.7 percent change
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Fasting Triglycerides and Lipoprotein(a) at Week 12 - On-Treatment AnalysisLipoprotein(a) (n= 30, 30, 30, 29, 27, 30)0.0 percent change
Alirocumab 50 mg Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in Fasting Triglycerides and Lipoprotein(a) at Week 12 - On-Treatment AnalysisFasting Triglycerides (n= 31, 30, 31, 29, 28, 30)-6.6 percent change
Alirocumab 50 mg Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in Fasting Triglycerides and Lipoprotein(a) at Week 12 - On-Treatment AnalysisLipoprotein(a) (n= 30, 30, 30, 29, 27, 30)-13.3 percent change
Alirocumab 100 mg Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in Fasting Triglycerides and Lipoprotein(a) at Week 12 - On-Treatment AnalysisFasting Triglycerides (n= 31, 30, 31, 29, 28, 30)-5.5 percent change
Alirocumab 100 mg Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in Fasting Triglycerides and Lipoprotein(a) at Week 12 - On-Treatment AnalysisLipoprotein(a) (n= 30, 30, 30, 29, 27, 30)-26.1 percent change
Alirocumab 150 mg Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in Fasting Triglycerides and Lipoprotein(a) at Week 12 - On-Treatment AnalysisFasting Triglycerides (n= 31, 30, 31, 29, 28, 30)-18.9 percent change
Alirocumab 150 mg Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in Fasting Triglycerides and Lipoprotein(a) at Week 12 - On-Treatment AnalysisLipoprotein(a) (n= 30, 30, 30, 29, 27, 30)-28.6 percent change
Alirocumab 200 mg Q4WPercent Change From Baseline in Fasting Triglycerides and Lipoprotein(a) at Week 12 - On-Treatment AnalysisFasting Triglycerides (n= 31, 30, 31, 29, 28, 30)-10.8 percent change
Alirocumab 200 mg Q4WPercent Change From Baseline in Fasting Triglycerides and Lipoprotein(a) at Week 12 - On-Treatment AnalysisLipoprotein(a) (n= 30, 30, 30, 29, 27, 30)-16.7 percent change
Alirocumab 300 mg Q4WPercent Change From Baseline in Fasting Triglycerides and Lipoprotein(a) at Week 12 - On-Treatment AnalysisFasting Triglycerides (n= 31, 30, 31, 29, 28, 30)-8.4 percent change
Alirocumab 300 mg Q4WPercent Change From Baseline in Fasting Triglycerides and Lipoprotein(a) at Week 12 - On-Treatment AnalysisLipoprotein(a) (n= 30, 30, 30, 29, 27, 30)-7.9 percent change
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol, High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C), Non-HDL-C and Apolipoprotein B (Apo-B) at Week 12 - On-Treatment Analysis

Adjusted LS means and standard errors were estimated using the same ANCOVA model as for primary endpoint.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 12 (LOCF)

Population: Participants of the mITT population with one baseline and at least one post-baseline on-treatment value for lipid parameters analyzed. Here, n signifies the number of participants analysed for each lipid parameter.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol, High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C), Non-HDL-C and Apolipoprotein B (Apo-B) at Week 12 - On-Treatment AnalysisNon-HDL-C (n= 31, 30, 31, 29, 28, 30)-2.2 percent changeStandard Error 2.9
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol, High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C), Non-HDL-C and Apolipoprotein B (Apo-B) at Week 12 - On-Treatment AnalysisTotal Cholesterol (n= 31, 30, 31, 29, 28, 30)-1.6 percent changeStandard Error 2.3
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol, High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C), Non-HDL-C and Apolipoprotein B (Apo-B) at Week 12 - On-Treatment AnalysisApo-B (n= 30, 30, 30, 29, 27, 30)2.2 percent changeStandard Error 2.9
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol, High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C), Non-HDL-C and Apolipoprotein B (Apo-B) at Week 12 - On-Treatment AnalysisHDL-C (n= 31, 30, 31, 29, 28, 30)-1.0 percent changeStandard Error 2.3
Alirocumab 50 mg Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol, High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C), Non-HDL-C and Apolipoprotein B (Apo-B) at Week 12 - On-Treatment AnalysisHDL-C (n= 31, 30, 31, 29, 28, 30)6.7 percent changeStandard Error 2.4
Alirocumab 50 mg Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol, High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C), Non-HDL-C and Apolipoprotein B (Apo-B) at Week 12 - On-Treatment AnalysisApo-B (n= 30, 30, 30, 29, 27, 30)-27.3 percent changeStandard Error 2.9
Alirocumab 50 mg Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol, High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C), Non-HDL-C and Apolipoprotein B (Apo-B) at Week 12 - On-Treatment AnalysisTotal Cholesterol (n= 31, 30, 31, 29, 28, 30)-23.0 percent changeStandard Error 2.3
Alirocumab 50 mg Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol, High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C), Non-HDL-C and Apolipoprotein B (Apo-B) at Week 12 - On-Treatment AnalysisNon-HDL-C (n= 31, 30, 31, 29, 28, 30)-33.6 percent changeStandard Error 2.9
Alirocumab 100 mg Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol, High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C), Non-HDL-C and Apolipoprotein B (Apo-B) at Week 12 - On-Treatment AnalysisTotal Cholesterol (n= 31, 30, 31, 29, 28, 30)-39.7 percent changeStandard Error 2.3
Alirocumab 100 mg Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol, High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C), Non-HDL-C and Apolipoprotein B (Apo-B) at Week 12 - On-Treatment AnalysisHDL-C (n= 31, 30, 31, 29, 28, 30)4.1 percent changeStandard Error 2.3
Alirocumab 100 mg Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol, High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C), Non-HDL-C and Apolipoprotein B (Apo-B) at Week 12 - On-Treatment AnalysisApo-B (n= 30, 30, 30, 29, 27, 30)-48.1 percent changeStandard Error 2.9
Alirocumab 100 mg Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol, High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C), Non-HDL-C and Apolipoprotein B (Apo-B) at Week 12 - On-Treatment AnalysisNon-HDL-C (n= 31, 30, 31, 29, 28, 30)-55.6 percent changeStandard Error 2.9
Alirocumab 150 mg Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol, High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C), Non-HDL-C and Apolipoprotein B (Apo-B) at Week 12 - On-Treatment AnalysisTotal Cholesterol (n= 31, 30, 31, 29, 28, 30)-45.2 percent changeStandard Error 2.3
Alirocumab 150 mg Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol, High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C), Non-HDL-C and Apolipoprotein B (Apo-B) at Week 12 - On-Treatment AnalysisHDL-C (n= 31, 30, 31, 29, 28, 30)5.5 percent changeStandard Error 2.4
Alirocumab 150 mg Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol, High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C), Non-HDL-C and Apolipoprotein B (Apo-B) at Week 12 - On-Treatment AnalysisNon-HDL-C (n= 31, 30, 31, 29, 28, 30)-62.5 percent changeStandard Error 3
Alirocumab 150 mg Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol, High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C), Non-HDL-C and Apolipoprotein B (Apo-B) at Week 12 - On-Treatment AnalysisApo-B (n= 30, 30, 30, 29, 27, 30)-56.1 percent changeStandard Error 2.9
Alirocumab 200 mg Q4WPercent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol, High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C), Non-HDL-C and Apolipoprotein B (Apo-B) at Week 12 - On-Treatment AnalysisHDL-C (n= 31, 30, 31, 29, 28, 30)6.3 percent changeStandard Error 2.5
Alirocumab 200 mg Q4WPercent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol, High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C), Non-HDL-C and Apolipoprotein B (Apo-B) at Week 12 - On-Treatment AnalysisApo-B (n= 30, 30, 30, 29, 27, 30)-28.7 percent changeStandard Error 3.1
Alirocumab 200 mg Q4WPercent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol, High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C), Non-HDL-C and Apolipoprotein B (Apo-B) at Week 12 - On-Treatment AnalysisNon-HDL-C (n= 31, 30, 31, 29, 28, 30)-37.4 percent changeStandard Error 3
Alirocumab 200 mg Q4WPercent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol, High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C), Non-HDL-C and Apolipoprotein B (Apo-B) at Week 12 - On-Treatment AnalysisTotal Cholesterol (n= 31, 30, 31, 29, 28, 30)-28.0 percent changeStandard Error 2.4
Alirocumab 300 mg Q4WPercent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol, High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C), Non-HDL-C and Apolipoprotein B (Apo-B) at Week 12 - On-Treatment AnalysisTotal Cholesterol (n= 31, 30, 31, 29, 28, 30)-29.8 percent changeStandard Error 2.3
Alirocumab 300 mg Q4WPercent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol, High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C), Non-HDL-C and Apolipoprotein B (Apo-B) at Week 12 - On-Treatment AnalysisApo-B (n= 30, 30, 30, 29, 27, 30)-33.1 percent changeStandard Error 2.9
Alirocumab 300 mg Q4WPercent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol, High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C), Non-HDL-C and Apolipoprotein B (Apo-B) at Week 12 - On-Treatment AnalysisHDL-C (n= 31, 30, 31, 29, 28, 30)8.5 percent changeStandard Error 2.4
Alirocumab 300 mg Q4WPercent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol, High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C), Non-HDL-C and Apolipoprotein B (Apo-B) at Week 12 - On-Treatment AnalysisNon-HDL-C (n= 31, 30, 31, 29, 28, 30)-40.7 percent changeStandard Error 2.9

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 26, 2026