Crohn's Disease
Conditions
Keywords
Crohn's Disease, safety, efficacy, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI)
Brief summary
This is a proof of concept study to determine the efficacy and safety of a monoclonal antibody with three doses versus placebo. Subjects will be randomized to a treatment and the dose will be delivered subcutaneously twice, 4 weeks apart. All subjects will have moderate to severe refractory Crohn's Disease.
Interventions
Placebo delivered SC, 2 doses separated by 4 weeks
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Subjects must have failed or are intolerant to anti TNFs * hsCRP greater or equal to 5.0 mg/L * Ulcerations demonstrated by colonoscopy as defined by SES CD assessment performed within 8 weeks of study entry (screening) and able to retrospectively complete the SES-CD or colonoscopy performed during screening
Exclusion criteria
* Pregnant or breastfeeding women * Crohn's Disease with active fistulae or abscess * History of diverticulitis or symptomatic diverticulosis * Abnormality in hematology or chemistry profiles at screening
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| The Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI)-70 Response Rate at Week 8 in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mg | Baseline and Week 8 | CDAI-70 response was defined as a decrease in CDAI score of 70 or greater from baseline. The proportions of participants with CDAI-70 response at Week 8 were compared between placebo and PF-04236921 10 mg/50 mg. CDAI is used to quantify the symptoms of patients with Crohn's Disease. CDAI evaluates 8 Crohn's disease-related variables during a 1-week assessment period, yielding a composite score greater than or equal to (\>=) 0 and without an upper limit. Many clinical trials use the endpoint for response as a 70 or greater point decrease in CDAI and clinical remission is often defined as a CDAI score below 150. The Outcome included a Generalized linear mixed model analyses which incorporated longitudinal data for each subject, and the same model is used for estimate (least squares mean) and statistical analysis (mean difference). |
| The CDAI-70 Response Rate at Week 8 in Participants Who Received Placebo and PF-04236921 200 mg | Baseline and Week 8 | CDAI-70 response was defined as a decrease in CDAI score of 70 or greater from baseline. The proportions of participants with CDAI-70 response at Week 8 were compared between placebo and PF-04236921 200 mg. CDAI is used to quantify the symptoms of patients with Crohn's Disease. CDAI evaluates 8 Crohn's disease-related variables during a 1-week assessment period, yielding a composite score \>=0 and without an upper limit. Many clinical trials use the endpoint for response as a 70 or greater point decrease in CDAI and clinical remission is often defined as a CDAI score below 150. The Outcome included a Generalized linear mixed model analyses which incorporated longitudinal data for each subject, and the same model is used for estimate (least squares mean) and statistical analysis (mean difference). Since the inputs in the model included different Analysis Population than in Outcome Measure 1, that will yield different estimates for placebo for the two different models. |
| The CDAI-70 Response Rate at Week 12 in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mg | Baseline and Week 12 | CDAI-70 response was defined as a decrease in CDAI score of 70 or greater from baseline. The proportions of participants with CDAI-70 response at Week 12 were compared between placebo and and PF-04236921 10 mg/50 mg. CDAI is used to quantify the symptoms of patients with Crohn's Disease. CDAI evaluates 8 Crohn's disease-related variables during a 1-week assessment period, yielding a composite score \>=0 and without an upper limit. Many clinical trials use the endpoint for response as a 70 or greater point decrease in CDAI and clinical remission is often defined as a CDAI score below 150. The Outcome included a Generalized linear mixed model analyses which incorporated longitudinal data for each subject, and the same model is used for estimate (least squares mean) and statistical analysis (mean difference). |
| The CDAI-70 Response Rate at Week 12 in Participants Who Received Placebo and PF-04236921 200 mg | Baseline and Week 12 | CDAI-70 response was defined as a decrease in CDAI score of 70 or greater from baseline. The proportions of participants with CDAI-70 response at Week 12 were compared between placebo and PF-04236921 200 mg. CDAI is used to quantify the symptoms of patients with Crohn's Disease. CDAI evaluates 8 Crohn's disease-related variables during a 1-week assessment period, yielding a composite score \>=0 and without an upper limit. Many clinical trials use the endpoint for response as a 70 or greater point decrease in CDAI and clinical remission is often defined as a CDAI score below 150. The Outcome included a Generalized linear mixed model analyses which incorporated longitudinal data for each subject, and the same model is used for estimate (least squares mean) and statistical analysis (mean difference). Since the inputs in the model included different Analysis Population than in Outcome Measure 3, that will yield different estimates for placebo for the two different models. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| The CDAI Remission Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo and PF-04236921 200 mg | Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 | CDAI remission rate was defined as an absolute CDAI score \<150. The proportions of participants with CDAI remission were compared between placebo and PF-04236921 200 mg. CDAI is used to quantify the symptoms of patients with Crohn's Disease. CDAI evaluates 8 Crohn's disease-related variables during a 1-week assessment period, yielding a composite score \>=0 and without an upper limit. Many clinical trials use the endpoint for response as a 70 or greater point decrease in CDAI and clinical remission is often defined as a CDAI score below 150. The Outcome included a Generalized linear mixed model analyses which incorporated longitudinal data for each subject, and the same model is used for estimate (least squares mean) and statistical analysis (mean difference). Since the inputs in the model included different Analysis Population than in Outcome Measure 7, that will yield different estimates for placebo for the two different models. |
| The CDAI-100 Response Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mg | Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 | CDAI-100 response was defined as a decrease in CDAI score of 100 or greater from baseline. The proportions of participants with CDAI-100 response at Week 12 were compared between placebo and PF-04236921 10 mg/50 mg. CDAI is used to quantify the symptoms of patients with Crohn's Disease. CDAI evaluates 8 Crohn's disease-related variables during a 1-week assessment period, yielding a composite score \>=0 and without an upper limit. Many clinical trials use the endpoint for response as a 70 or greater point decrease in CDAI and clinical remission is often defined as a CDAI score below 150. The Outcome included a Generalized linear mixed model analyses which incorporated longitudinal data for each subject, and the same model is used for estimate (least squares mean) and statistical analysis (mean difference). |
| The CDAI-100 Response Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo and PF-04236921 200 mg | Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 | CDAI-100 response was defined as a decrease in CDAI score of 100 or greater from baseline. The proportions of participants with CDAI-100 response at Week 12 were compared between placebo and PF-04236921 200 mg. CDAI is used to quantify the symptoms of patients with Crohn's Disease. CDAI evaluates 8 Crohn's disease-related variables during a 1-week assessment period, yielding a composite score \>=0 and without an upper limit. Many clinical trials use the endpoint for response as a 70 or greater point decrease in CDAI and clinical remission is often defined as a CDAI score below 150. The Outcome included a Generalized linear mixed model analyses which incorporated longitudinal data for each subject, and the same model is used for estimate (least squares mean) and statistical analysis (mean difference). Since the inputs in the model included different Analysis Population than in Outcome Measure 9, that will yield different estimates for placebo for the two different models. |
| Change From Baseline in CDAI Score Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mg | Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 | CDAI evaluates 8 Crohn's disease-related variables during a 1-week assessment period, yielding a composite score \>=0 and without an upper limit, and higher score indicate more severe disease. The Outcome included a Linear mixed model analyses which incorporated longitudinal data for each subject, and the same model is used for estimate (least squares mean) and statistical analysis (mean difference). |
| The CDAI-70 Response Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mg | Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 6, and 10 | CDAI-70 response was defined as a decrease in CDAI score of 70 or greater from baseline. The proportions of participants with CDAI-70 response were compared between placebo and PF-04236921 10 mg/50 mg. CDAI is used to quantify the symptoms of patients with Crohn's Disease. CDAI evaluates 8 Crohn's disease-related variables during a 1-week assessment period, yielding a composite score \>=0 and without an upper limit. Many clinical trials use the endpoint for response as a 70 or greater point decrease in CDAI and clinical remission is often defined as a CDAI score below 150. The Outcome included a Generalized linear mixed model analyses which incorporated longitudinal data for each subject, and the same model is used for estimate (least squares mean) and statistical analysis (mean difference). |
| Percentages of Participants With Confirmed Positive Neutralizing Antibodies (NAbs) | At baseline (Day 1) and at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 32 and 40 | The percentage of participants with confirmed positive NAbs was summarized for each treatment arm. Only ADA positive samples were analyzed for Nab. A multi-tiered approach was utilized to detect NAbs. NAb serum samples were screened at tier one, and those found presumptively NAb positive was further tested with the confirmatory assay (tier two). The percentage of subjects with confirmed positive NAbs was summarized for each treatment. |
| Serum PF-04236921 Concentration Over Time | Day 1 (predose), and at Weeks 2, 4 (Day 28, predose), 8, 10, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, and 40 | — |
| Number of Participants Who Withdrew From the Study Due to Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs) | Induction period: from Week 0 (Day 1) through Week 12; follow-up period: from Week 12 (or discontinuation from the induction period) through last subject visit (up to 28 weeks after completion of or discontinuation from the 12-week induction period) | An AE was any untoward medical occurrence without regard to causality in a participant who received study drug. Treatment-emergent were events between first dose of treatment and up to 28 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. |
| Percentages of Participants With Confirmed Positive Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs) | At baseline (Day 1) and at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 32 and 40 | The percentage of participants with confirmed positive ADA was summarized for each treatment arm. ADA positive was defined as ADA titer defined as ADA titer (ie, the reciprocal of the highest dilution that gives a value equivalent to the cut point of the assay) \>= 4.32. |
| The CDAI-70 Response Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo and PF-04236921 200 mg | Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 6, and 10 | CDAI-70 response was defined as a decrease in CDAI score of 70 or greater from baseline. The proportions of participants with CDAI-70 response were compared between placebo and PF-04236921 200 mg. CDAI is used to quantify the symptoms of patients with Crohn's Disease. CDAI evaluates 8 Crohn's disease-related variables during a 1-week assessment period, yielding a composite score \>=0 and without an upper limit. Many clinical trials use the endpoint for response as a 70 or greater point decrease in CDAI and clinical remission is often defined as a CDAI score below 150. The Outcome included a Generalized linear mixed model analyses which incorporated longitudinal data for each subject, and the same model is used for estimate (least squares mean) and statistical analysis (mean difference). Since the inputs in the model included different Analysis Population than in Outcome Measure 5, that will yield different estimates for placebo for the two different models. |
| Change From Baseline in CDAI Score Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo and PF-04236921 200 mg | Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 | CDAI evaluates 8 Crohn's disease-related variables during a 1-week assessment period, yielding a composite score \>=0 and without an upper limit, and higher score indicate more severe disease. The Outcome included a Linear mixed model analyses which incorporated longitudinal data for each subject, and the same model is used for estimate (least squares mean) and statistical analysis (mean difference). Since the inputs in the model included different Analysis Population than in Outcome Measure 11, that will yield different estimates for placebo for the two different models. |
| The CDAI Remission Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mg | Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 | CDAI remission rate was defined as an absolute CDAI score less than (\<) 150. The proportions of participants with CDAI remission were compared between placebo and PF-04236921 10 mg/50 mg. CDAI is used to quantify the symptoms of patients with Crohn's Disease. CDAI evaluates 8 Crohn's disease-related variables during a 1-week assessment period, yielding a composite score \>=0 and without an upper limit. Many clinical trials use the endpoint for response as a 70 or greater point decrease in CDAI and clinical remission is often defined as a CDAI score below 150. The Outcome included a Generalized linear mixed model analyses which incorporated longitudinal data for each subject, and the same model is used for estimate (least squares mean) and statistical analysis (mean difference). |
Countries
Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Czechia, Denmark, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Israel, Italy, New Zealand, Romania, Switzerland, United Kingdom, United States
Participant flow
Recruitment details
This study included a 28-day screening period, an induction period (Week 0-12) and a 28-week follow-up period. Participants who completed the induction treatment period could enter the follow-up period or an open-label extension study, NCT01345318. Participants who discontinued treatment during the induction period could enter the follow-up period.
Pre-assignment details
A total of 250 participants were randomized via Interactive Voice Response System (IVRS); of which, 247 received investigational product and 3 were randomized inadvertently and not dosed (2 did not meet entrance criteria and 1 did not consent properly and was not included in clinical database because the randomization page was not completed).
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Placebo Placebo administered SC in the anterolateral right and left thighs on Day 1 and Day 28. Each participant received 2 injections due to the double-dummy design of the study. | 69 |
| PF-04236921 10 mg PF-04236921 10 mg administered SC in the anterolateral right and left thighs on Day 1 and Day 28. Each participant received 2 injections due to the double-dummy design of the study. | 67 |
| PF-04236921 50 mg PF-04236921 50 mg administered SC in the anterolateral right and left thighs on Day 1 and Day 28. Each participant received 2 injections due to the double-dummy design of the study. | 71 |
| PF-04236921 200 mg PF-04236921 200 mg administered SC in the anterolateral right and left thighs on Day 1 and Day 28. Each participant received 2 injections due to the double-dummy design of the study. | 40 |
| Total | 247 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 | FG002 | FG003 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Adverse Event | 5 | 3 | 6 | 4 |
| Overall Study | Lack of Efficacy | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Not consented properly | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Not meeting entrance criteria | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Other | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Protocol Violation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 1 | 5 | 3 | 2 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Placebo | PF-04236921 10 mg | PF-04236921 50 mg | PF-04236921 200 mg | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 38.4 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.6 | 38.9 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.9 | 38.9 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.1 | 42.2 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.2 | 39.3 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.2 |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 38 Participants | 34 Participants | 44 Participants | 25 Participants | 141 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 31 Participants | 33 Participants | 27 Participants | 15 Participants | 106 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk | EG003 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — | — / — | — / — | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 36 / 69 | 38 / 67 | 48 / 71 | 20 / 40 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 11 / 69 | 11 / 67 | 12 / 71 | 11 / 40 |
Outcome results
The CDAI-70 Response Rate at Week 12 in Participants Who Received Placebo and PF-04236921 200 mg
CDAI-70 response was defined as a decrease in CDAI score of 70 or greater from baseline. The proportions of participants with CDAI-70 response at Week 12 were compared between placebo and PF-04236921 200 mg. CDAI is used to quantify the symptoms of patients with Crohn's Disease. CDAI evaluates 8 Crohn's disease-related variables during a 1-week assessment period, yielding a composite score \>=0 and without an upper limit. Many clinical trials use the endpoint for response as a 70 or greater point decrease in CDAI and clinical remission is often defined as a CDAI score below 150. The Outcome included a Generalized linear mixed model analyses which incorporated longitudinal data for each subject, and the same model is used for estimate (least squares mean) and statistical analysis (mean difference). Since the inputs in the model included different Analysis Population than in Outcome Measure 3, that will yield different estimates for placebo for the two different models.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Population: The analysis was performed on FAS 200 mg vs placebo. The 200 mg arm was halted before reaching the planned sample size of approximately 60 and was no longer powered at the planned level to test against placebo. Thus, the 200 mg vs placebo comparison is a sensitivity analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | The CDAI-70 Response Rate at Week 12 in Participants Who Received Placebo and PF-04236921 200 mg | 26.7 Percentage of participants |
| PF-04236921 10 mg | The CDAI-70 Response Rate at Week 12 in Participants Who Received Placebo and PF-04236921 200 mg | 41.7 Percentage of participants |
The CDAI-70 Response Rate at Week 12 in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mg
CDAI-70 response was defined as a decrease in CDAI score of 70 or greater from baseline. The proportions of participants with CDAI-70 response at Week 12 were compared between placebo and and PF-04236921 10 mg/50 mg. CDAI is used to quantify the symptoms of patients with Crohn's Disease. CDAI evaluates 8 Crohn's disease-related variables during a 1-week assessment period, yielding a composite score \>=0 and without an upper limit. Many clinical trials use the endpoint for response as a 70 or greater point decrease in CDAI and clinical remission is often defined as a CDAI score below 150. The Outcome included a Generalized linear mixed model analyses which incorporated longitudinal data for each subject, and the same model is used for estimate (least squares mean) and statistical analysis (mean difference).
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Population: Primary analysis: FAS excluding 200 mg arm (halted prematurely before reaching the planned sample size and thus no longer powered at the planned level to test against placebo).
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | The CDAI-70 Response Rate at Week 12 in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mg | 28.6 Percentage of participants |
| PF-04236921 10 mg | The CDAI-70 Response Rate at Week 12 in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mg | 35.2 Percentage of participants |
| PF-04236921 50 mg | The CDAI-70 Response Rate at Week 12 in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mg | 47.4 Percentage of participants |
The CDAI-70 Response Rate at Week 8 in Participants Who Received Placebo and PF-04236921 200 mg
CDAI-70 response was defined as a decrease in CDAI score of 70 or greater from baseline. The proportions of participants with CDAI-70 response at Week 8 were compared between placebo and PF-04236921 200 mg. CDAI is used to quantify the symptoms of patients with Crohn's Disease. CDAI evaluates 8 Crohn's disease-related variables during a 1-week assessment period, yielding a composite score \>=0 and without an upper limit. Many clinical trials use the endpoint for response as a 70 or greater point decrease in CDAI and clinical remission is often defined as a CDAI score below 150. The Outcome included a Generalized linear mixed model analyses which incorporated longitudinal data for each subject, and the same model is used for estimate (least squares mean) and statistical analysis (mean difference). Since the inputs in the model included different Analysis Population than in Outcome Measure 1, that will yield different estimates for placebo for the two different models.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 8
Population: The analysis was performed on FAS participants of the 200 mg and placebo arms, referred to as FAS 200 mg versus (vs) placebo. The 200 mg arm was halted before reaching the planned sample size of approximately 60 and was no longer powered at the planned level to test against placebo. Thus, the 200 mg vs placebo comparison is a sensitivity analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | The CDAI-70 Response Rate at Week 8 in Participants Who Received Placebo and PF-04236921 200 mg | 28.8 Percentage of participants |
| PF-04236921 10 mg | The CDAI-70 Response Rate at Week 8 in Participants Who Received Placebo and PF-04236921 200 mg | 39.0 Percentage of participants |
The Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI)-70 Response Rate at Week 8 in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mg
CDAI-70 response was defined as a decrease in CDAI score of 70 or greater from baseline. The proportions of participants with CDAI-70 response at Week 8 were compared between placebo and PF-04236921 10 mg/50 mg. CDAI is used to quantify the symptoms of patients with Crohn's Disease. CDAI evaluates 8 Crohn's disease-related variables during a 1-week assessment period, yielding a composite score greater than or equal to (\>=) 0 and without an upper limit. Many clinical trials use the endpoint for response as a 70 or greater point decrease in CDAI and clinical remission is often defined as a CDAI score below 150. The Outcome included a Generalized linear mixed model analyses which incorporated longitudinal data for each subject, and the same model is used for estimate (least squares mean) and statistical analysis (mean difference).
Time frame: Baseline and Week 8
Population: Primary analysis: full analysis set (FAS, defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment; 2 participants \[10 mg arm\] excluded due to a quality issue) excluding 200 mg (halted prematurely before reaching the planned sample size and thus no longer powered at the planned level to test against placebo).
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | The Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI)-70 Response Rate at Week 8 in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mg | 30.6 Percentage of participants |
| PF-04236921 10 mg | The Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI)-70 Response Rate at Week 8 in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mg | 35.0 Percentage of participants |
| PF-04236921 50 mg | The Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI)-70 Response Rate at Week 8 in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mg | 49.3 Percentage of participants |
Change From Baseline in CDAI Score Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo and PF-04236921 200 mg
CDAI evaluates 8 Crohn's disease-related variables during a 1-week assessment period, yielding a composite score \>=0 and without an upper limit, and higher score indicate more severe disease. The Outcome included a Linear mixed model analyses which incorporated longitudinal data for each subject, and the same model is used for estimate (least squares mean) and statistical analysis (mean difference). Since the inputs in the model included different Analysis Population than in Outcome Measure 11, that will yield different estimates for placebo for the two different models.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12
Population: The analysis was performed on the FAS 200 mg vs placebo. The 200 mg arm was halted before reaching the planned sample size of approximately 60 participants. n signifies the number of subjects with observed data of each arm at each time point.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in CDAI Score Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo and PF-04236921 200 mg | Week 4 (n=66, 35) | -26.6 points on a scale |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in CDAI Score Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo and PF-04236921 200 mg | Week 8 (n=58, 29) | -39.1 points on a scale |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in CDAI Score Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo and PF-04236921 200 mg | Week 6 (n=58, 32) | -36.7 points on a scale |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in CDAI Score Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo and PF-04236921 200 mg | Week 10 (n=54, 29) | -26.3 points on a scale |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in CDAI Score Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo and PF-04236921 200 mg | Week 12 (n=57, 29) | -35.2 points on a scale |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in CDAI Score Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo and PF-04236921 200 mg | Week 2 (n=64, 36) | -21.3 points on a scale |
| PF-04236921 10 mg | Change From Baseline in CDAI Score Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo and PF-04236921 200 mg | Week 12 (n=57, 29) | -66.2 points on a scale |
| PF-04236921 10 mg | Change From Baseline in CDAI Score Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo and PF-04236921 200 mg | Week 10 (n=54, 29) | -56.1 points on a scale |
| PF-04236921 10 mg | Change From Baseline in CDAI Score Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo and PF-04236921 200 mg | Week 2 (n=64, 36) | -30.1 points on a scale |
| PF-04236921 10 mg | Change From Baseline in CDAI Score Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo and PF-04236921 200 mg | Week 4 (n=66, 35) | -30.5 points on a scale |
| PF-04236921 10 mg | Change From Baseline in CDAI Score Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo and PF-04236921 200 mg | Week 6 (n=58, 32) | -42.2 points on a scale |
| PF-04236921 10 mg | Change From Baseline in CDAI Score Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo and PF-04236921 200 mg | Week 8 (n=58, 29) | -48.1 points on a scale |
Change From Baseline in CDAI Score Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mg
CDAI evaluates 8 Crohn's disease-related variables during a 1-week assessment period, yielding a composite score \>=0 and without an upper limit, and higher score indicate more severe disease. The Outcome included a Linear mixed model analyses which incorporated longitudinal data for each subject, and the same model is used for estimate (least squares mean) and statistical analysis (mean difference).
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12
Population: The analysis was performed on the FAS excluding 200 mg arm (which was halted prematurely). n signifies the number of subjects with observed data of each arm at each time point.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in CDAI Score Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mg | Week 2 (n=64, 63, 65) | -18.9 points on a scale |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in CDAI Score Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mg | Week 10 (n=54, 50, 51) | -19.8 points on a scale |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in CDAI Score Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mg | Week 8 (n=58, 53, 56) | -34.6 points on a scale |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in CDAI Score Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mg | Week 6 (n=58, 53, 60) | -32.6 points on a scale |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in CDAI Score Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mg | Week 4 (n=66, 58, 59) | -25.1 points on a scale |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in CDAI Score Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mg | Week 12 (n=57, 52, 54) | -27.3 points on a scale |
| PF-04236921 10 mg | Change From Baseline in CDAI Score Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mg | Week 2 (n=64, 63, 65) | -28.4 points on a scale |
| PF-04236921 10 mg | Change From Baseline in CDAI Score Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mg | Week 4 (n=66, 58, 59) | -37.1 points on a scale |
| PF-04236921 10 mg | Change From Baseline in CDAI Score Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mg | Week 6 (n=58, 53, 60) | -48.5 points on a scale |
| PF-04236921 10 mg | Change From Baseline in CDAI Score Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mg | Week 8 (n=58, 53, 56) | -49.6 points on a scale |
| PF-04236921 10 mg | Change From Baseline in CDAI Score Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mg | Week 10 (n=54, 50, 51) | -50.0 points on a scale |
| PF-04236921 10 mg | Change From Baseline in CDAI Score Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mg | Week 12 (n=57, 52, 54) | -44.2 points on a scale |
| PF-04236921 50 mg | Change From Baseline in CDAI Score Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mg | Week 6 (n=58, 53, 60) | -54.9 points on a scale |
| PF-04236921 50 mg | Change From Baseline in CDAI Score Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mg | Week 2 (n=64, 63, 65) | -16.2 points on a scale |
| PF-04236921 50 mg | Change From Baseline in CDAI Score Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mg | Week 10 (n=54, 50, 51) | -64.7 points on a scale |
| PF-04236921 50 mg | Change From Baseline in CDAI Score Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mg | Week 12 (n=57, 52, 54) | -66.8 points on a scale |
| PF-04236921 50 mg | Change From Baseline in CDAI Score Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mg | Week 4 (n=66, 58, 59) | -50.7 points on a scale |
| PF-04236921 50 mg | Change From Baseline in CDAI Score Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mg | Week 8 (n=58, 53, 56) | -63.5 points on a scale |
Number of Participants Who Withdrew From the Study Due to Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence without regard to causality in a participant who received study drug. Treatment-emergent were events between first dose of treatment and up to 28 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state.
Time frame: Induction period: from Week 0 (Day 1) through Week 12; follow-up period: from Week 12 (or discontinuation from the induction period) through last subject visit (up to 28 weeks after completion of or discontinuation from the 12-week induction period)
Population: The SAS consisted of all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. n signifies number of participants with observed data at the time point of each arm. From Weeks 16 to 40, only participants who remained in the follow-up period of this study and did not enter NCT01405196 were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Number of Participants Who Withdrew From the Study Due to Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs) | Induction period (Weeks 0 to 12) | 7 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants Who Withdrew From the Study Due to Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs) | Follow-up period (after Week 12) | 0 participants |
| PF-04236921 10 mg | Number of Participants Who Withdrew From the Study Due to Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs) | Follow-up period (after Week 12) | 0 participants |
| PF-04236921 10 mg | Number of Participants Who Withdrew From the Study Due to Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs) | Induction period (Weeks 0 to 12) | 6 participants |
| PF-04236921 50 mg | Number of Participants Who Withdrew From the Study Due to Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs) | Induction period (Weeks 0 to 12) | 6 participants |
| PF-04236921 50 mg | Number of Participants Who Withdrew From the Study Due to Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs) | Follow-up period (after Week 12) | 0 participants |
| PF-04236921 200 mg | Number of Participants Who Withdrew From the Study Due to Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs) | Induction period (Weeks 0 to 12) | 8 participants |
| PF-04236921 200 mg | Number of Participants Who Withdrew From the Study Due to Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs) | Follow-up period (after Week 12) | 0 participants |
Percentages of Participants With Confirmed Positive Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs)
The percentage of participants with confirmed positive ADA was summarized for each treatment arm. ADA positive was defined as ADA titer defined as ADA titer (ie, the reciprocal of the highest dilution that gives a value equivalent to the cut point of the assay) \>= 4.32.
Time frame: At baseline (Day 1) and at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 32 and 40
Population: The SAS consisted of all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. n signifies number of participants with observed data at the time point of each arm. From Weeks 16 to 40, only participants who remained in the follow-up period of this study and did not enter NCT01405196 were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Percentages of Participants With Confirmed Positive Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs) | Day 1 (n=56, 66, 36) | 0.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentages of Participants With Confirmed Positive Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs) | Week 4 (n=58, 62, 29) | 0.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentages of Participants With Confirmed Positive Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs) | Week 8 (n=53, 53, 27) | 0.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentages of Participants With Confirmed Positive Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs) | Week 12 (n=46, 49, 24) | 0.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentages of Participants With Confirmed Positive Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs) | Week 16 (n=2, 1, 0) | 0.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentages of Participants With Confirmed Positive Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs) | Week 24 (n=2, 1, 0) | 0.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentages of Participants With Confirmed Positive Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs) | Week 32 (n=1, 0, 0) | 0.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentages of Participants With Confirmed Positive Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs) | Week 40 (n=2, 1, 0) | 0.0 percentage of participants |
| PF-04236921 10 mg | Percentages of Participants With Confirmed Positive Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs) | Week 8 (n=53, 53, 27) | 0.0 percentage of participants |
| PF-04236921 10 mg | Percentages of Participants With Confirmed Positive Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs) | Week 32 (n=1, 0, 0) | NA percentage of participants |
| PF-04236921 10 mg | Percentages of Participants With Confirmed Positive Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs) | Week 12 (n=46, 49, 24) | 0.0 percentage of participants |
| PF-04236921 10 mg | Percentages of Participants With Confirmed Positive Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs) | Week 16 (n=2, 1, 0) | 0.0 percentage of participants |
| PF-04236921 10 mg | Percentages of Participants With Confirmed Positive Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs) | Week 24 (n=2, 1, 0) | 0.0 percentage of participants |
| PF-04236921 10 mg | Percentages of Participants With Confirmed Positive Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs) | Day 1 (n=56, 66, 36) | 0.0 percentage of participants |
| PF-04236921 10 mg | Percentages of Participants With Confirmed Positive Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs) | Week 4 (n=58, 62, 29) | 1.6 percentage of participants |
| PF-04236921 10 mg | Percentages of Participants With Confirmed Positive Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs) | Week 40 (n=2, 1, 0) | 0.0 percentage of participants |
| PF-04236921 50 mg | Percentages of Participants With Confirmed Positive Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs) | Week 8 (n=53, 53, 27) | 0.0 percentage of participants |
| PF-04236921 50 mg | Percentages of Participants With Confirmed Positive Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs) | Week 4 (n=58, 62, 29) | 0.0 percentage of participants |
| PF-04236921 50 mg | Percentages of Participants With Confirmed Positive Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs) | Day 1 (n=56, 66, 36) | 0.0 percentage of participants |
| PF-04236921 50 mg | Percentages of Participants With Confirmed Positive Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs) | Week 12 (n=46, 49, 24) | 0.0 percentage of participants |
| PF-04236921 50 mg | Percentages of Participants With Confirmed Positive Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs) | Week 32 (n=1, 0, 0) | NA percentage of participants |
| PF-04236921 50 mg | Percentages of Participants With Confirmed Positive Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs) | Week 24 (n=2, 1, 0) | NA percentage of participants |
| PF-04236921 50 mg | Percentages of Participants With Confirmed Positive Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs) | Week 16 (n=2, 1, 0) | NA percentage of participants |
| PF-04236921 50 mg | Percentages of Participants With Confirmed Positive Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs) | Week 40 (n=2, 1, 0) | NA percentage of participants |
Percentages of Participants With Confirmed Positive Neutralizing Antibodies (NAbs)
The percentage of participants with confirmed positive NAbs was summarized for each treatment arm. Only ADA positive samples were analyzed for Nab. A multi-tiered approach was utilized to detect NAbs. NAb serum samples were screened at tier one, and those found presumptively NAb positive was further tested with the confirmatory assay (tier two). The percentage of subjects with confirmed positive NAbs was summarized for each treatment.
Time frame: At baseline (Day 1) and at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 32 and 40
Population: The SAS consisted of all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. n signifies number of participants with observed data at the time point of each arm. From Weeks 16 to 40, only participants who remained in the follow-up period of this study and did not enter NCT01405196 were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Percentages of Participants With Confirmed Positive Neutralizing Antibodies (NAbs) | Week 32 (n=1, 0, 0) | 0.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentages of Participants With Confirmed Positive Neutralizing Antibodies (NAbs) | Week 8 (n=53, 53, 27) | 0.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentages of Participants With Confirmed Positive Neutralizing Antibodies (NAbs) | Week 40 (n=2, 1, 0) | 0.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentages of Participants With Confirmed Positive Neutralizing Antibodies (NAbs) | Week 16 (n=2, 1, 0) | 0.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentages of Participants With Confirmed Positive Neutralizing Antibodies (NAbs) | Week 24 (n=2, 1, 0) | 0.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentages of Participants With Confirmed Positive Neutralizing Antibodies (NAbs) | Day 1 (n=56, 66, 36) | 0.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentages of Participants With Confirmed Positive Neutralizing Antibodies (NAbs) | Week 12 (n=46, 49, 24) | 0.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentages of Participants With Confirmed Positive Neutralizing Antibodies (NAbs) | Week 4 (n=58, 62, 29) | 0.0 percentage of participants |
| PF-04236921 10 mg | Percentages of Participants With Confirmed Positive Neutralizing Antibodies (NAbs) | Week 24 (n=2, 1, 0) | 0.0 percentage of participants |
| PF-04236921 10 mg | Percentages of Participants With Confirmed Positive Neutralizing Antibodies (NAbs) | Week 4 (n=58, 62, 29) | 1.6 percentage of participants |
| PF-04236921 10 mg | Percentages of Participants With Confirmed Positive Neutralizing Antibodies (NAbs) | Week 8 (n=53, 53, 27) | 0.0 percentage of participants |
| PF-04236921 10 mg | Percentages of Participants With Confirmed Positive Neutralizing Antibodies (NAbs) | Week 12 (n=46, 49, 24) | 0.0 percentage of participants |
| PF-04236921 10 mg | Percentages of Participants With Confirmed Positive Neutralizing Antibodies (NAbs) | Week 16 (n=2, 1, 0) | 0.0 percentage of participants |
| PF-04236921 10 mg | Percentages of Participants With Confirmed Positive Neutralizing Antibodies (NAbs) | Week 32 (n=1, 0, 0) | NA percentage of participants |
| PF-04236921 10 mg | Percentages of Participants With Confirmed Positive Neutralizing Antibodies (NAbs) | Week 40 (n=2, 1, 0) | 0.0 percentage of participants |
| PF-04236921 10 mg | Percentages of Participants With Confirmed Positive Neutralizing Antibodies (NAbs) | Day 1 (n=56, 66, 36) | 0.0 percentage of participants |
| PF-04236921 50 mg | Percentages of Participants With Confirmed Positive Neutralizing Antibodies (NAbs) | Week 40 (n=2, 1, 0) | NA percentage of participants |
| PF-04236921 50 mg | Percentages of Participants With Confirmed Positive Neutralizing Antibodies (NAbs) | Week 16 (n=2, 1, 0) | NA percentage of participants |
| PF-04236921 50 mg | Percentages of Participants With Confirmed Positive Neutralizing Antibodies (NAbs) | Week 24 (n=2, 1, 0) | NA percentage of participants |
| PF-04236921 50 mg | Percentages of Participants With Confirmed Positive Neutralizing Antibodies (NAbs) | Week 32 (n=1, 0, 0) | NA percentage of participants |
| PF-04236921 50 mg | Percentages of Participants With Confirmed Positive Neutralizing Antibodies (NAbs) | Week 4 (n=58, 62, 29) | 0.0 percentage of participants |
| PF-04236921 50 mg | Percentages of Participants With Confirmed Positive Neutralizing Antibodies (NAbs) | Day 1 (n=56, 66, 36) | 0.0 percentage of participants |
| PF-04236921 50 mg | Percentages of Participants With Confirmed Positive Neutralizing Antibodies (NAbs) | Week 8 (n=53, 53, 27) | 0.0 percentage of participants |
| PF-04236921 50 mg | Percentages of Participants With Confirmed Positive Neutralizing Antibodies (NAbs) | Week 12 (n=46, 49, 24) | 0.0 percentage of participants |
Serum PF-04236921 Concentration Over Time
Time frame: Day 1 (predose), and at Weeks 2, 4 (Day 28, predose), 8, 10, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, and 40
Population: The pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis set was the subset of participants from the SAS who provided at least 1 PK concentration (2 participants \[10 mg arm\] excluded due to a quality issue). n is the number of participants with PK data at the visit. From Weeks 16 to 40, only participants who remained in the follow-up period of this study were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Serum PF-04236921 Concentration Over Time | Week 2 (n=46, 56, 30) | 1060 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) | Standard Deviation 531.3 |
| Placebo | Serum PF-04236921 Concentration Over Time | Week 36 (n=2, 1, 0) | NA nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) | — |
| Placebo | Serum PF-04236921 Concentration Over Time | Week 28 (n=2, 0, 0) | NA nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) | — |
| Placebo | Serum PF-04236921 Concentration Over Time | Week 20 (n=2, 1, 0) | 102 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) | Standard Deviation 143.5 |
| Placebo | Serum PF-04236921 Concentration Over Time | Week 10 (n=47, 54, 29) | 695 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) | Standard Deviation 428.5 |
| Placebo | Serum PF-04236921 Concentration Over Time | Week 6 (n=48, 57, 28) | 1470 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) | Standard Deviation 863 |
| Placebo | Serum PF-04236921 Concentration Over Time | Week 16 (n=2, 1, 0) | 177 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) | Standard Deviation 250.3 |
| Placebo | Serum PF-04236921 Concentration Over Time | Week 8 (n=51, 52, 28) | 992 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) | Standard Deviation 501.7 |
| Placebo | Serum PF-04236921 Concentration Over Time | Week 32 (n=2, 0, 0) | NA nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) | — |
| Placebo | Serum PF-04236921 Concentration Over Time | Week 24 (n=2, 1, 0) | 63.5 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) | Standard Deviation 89.8 |
| Placebo | Serum PF-04236921 Concentration Over Time | Week 4 (n=56, 63, 29) | 674 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) | Standard Deviation 339.3 |
| Placebo | Serum PF-04236921 Concentration Over Time | Day 1 (n=54, 64, 37) | 4.52 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) | Standard Deviation 33.2 |
| Placebo | Serum PF-04236921 Concentration Over Time | Week 40 (n=2, 1, 0) | NA nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) | — |
| Placebo | Serum PF-04236921 Concentration Over Time | Week 12 (n=43, 51, 26) | 504 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) | Standard Deviation 435.5 |
| PF-04236921 10 mg | Serum PF-04236921 Concentration Over Time | Week 28 (n=2, 0, 0) | NA nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) | — |
| PF-04236921 10 mg | Serum PF-04236921 Concentration Over Time | Week 12 (n=43, 51, 26) | 2110 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) | Standard Deviation 1333 |
| PF-04236921 10 mg | Serum PF-04236921 Concentration Over Time | Week 16 (n=2, 1, 0) | 1290 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) | — |
| PF-04236921 10 mg | Serum PF-04236921 Concentration Over Time | Week 20 (n=2, 1, 0) | 425 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) | — |
| PF-04236921 10 mg | Serum PF-04236921 Concentration Over Time | Day 1 (n=54, 64, 37) | 2.05 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) | Standard Deviation 16.38 |
| PF-04236921 10 mg | Serum PF-04236921 Concentration Over Time | Week 2 (n=46, 56, 30) | 4580 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) | Standard Deviation 1938 |
| PF-04236921 10 mg | Serum PF-04236921 Concentration Over Time | Week 4 (n=56, 63, 29) | 3180 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) | Standard Deviation 1555 |
| PF-04236921 10 mg | Serum PF-04236921 Concentration Over Time | Week 6 (n=48, 57, 28) | 6610 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) | Standard Deviation 2668 |
| PF-04236921 10 mg | Serum PF-04236921 Concentration Over Time | Week 8 (n=51, 52, 28) | 4500 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) | Standard Deviation 1993 |
| PF-04236921 10 mg | Serum PF-04236921 Concentration Over Time | Week 10 (n=47, 54, 29) | 3280 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) | Standard Deviation 1961 |
| PF-04236921 10 mg | Serum PF-04236921 Concentration Over Time | Week 24 (n=2, 1, 0) | NA nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) | — |
| PF-04236921 10 mg | Serum PF-04236921 Concentration Over Time | Week 32 (n=2, 0, 0) | NA nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) | — |
| PF-04236921 10 mg | Serum PF-04236921 Concentration Over Time | Week 36 (n=2, 1, 0) | 109 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) | — |
| PF-04236921 10 mg | Serum PF-04236921 Concentration Over Time | Week 40 (n=2, 1, 0) | NA nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) | — |
| PF-04236921 50 mg | Serum PF-04236921 Concentration Over Time | Week 36 (n=2, 1, 0) | NA nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) | — |
| PF-04236921 50 mg | Serum PF-04236921 Concentration Over Time | Week 24 (n=2, 1, 0) | NA nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) | — |
| PF-04236921 50 mg | Serum PF-04236921 Concentration Over Time | Week 2 (n=46, 56, 30) | 21300 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) | Standard Deviation 9547 |
| PF-04236921 50 mg | Serum PF-04236921 Concentration Over Time | Day 1 (n=54, 64, 37) | NA nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) | — |
| PF-04236921 50 mg | Serum PF-04236921 Concentration Over Time | Week 28 (n=2, 0, 0) | NA nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) | — |
| PF-04236921 50 mg | Serum PF-04236921 Concentration Over Time | Week 20 (n=2, 1, 0) | NA nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) | — |
| PF-04236921 50 mg | Serum PF-04236921 Concentration Over Time | Week 12 (n=43, 51, 26) | 10900 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) | Standard Deviation 7802 |
| PF-04236921 50 mg | Serum PF-04236921 Concentration Over Time | Week 32 (n=2, 0, 0) | NA nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) | — |
| PF-04236921 50 mg | Serum PF-04236921 Concentration Over Time | Week 6 (n=48, 57, 28) | 32200 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) | Standard Deviation 13240 |
| PF-04236921 50 mg | Serum PF-04236921 Concentration Over Time | Week 16 (n=2, 1, 0) | NA nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) | — |
| PF-04236921 50 mg | Serum PF-04236921 Concentration Over Time | Week 8 (n=51, 52, 28) | 20200 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) | Standard Deviation 8683 |
| PF-04236921 50 mg | Serum PF-04236921 Concentration Over Time | Week 4 (n=56, 63, 29) | 14800 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) | Standard Deviation 6641 |
| PF-04236921 50 mg | Serum PF-04236921 Concentration Over Time | Week 40 (n=2, 1, 0) | NA nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) | — |
| PF-04236921 50 mg | Serum PF-04236921 Concentration Over Time | Week 10 (n=47, 54, 29) | 13600 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) | Standard Deviation 7350 |
The CDAI-100 Response Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo and PF-04236921 200 mg
CDAI-100 response was defined as a decrease in CDAI score of 100 or greater from baseline. The proportions of participants with CDAI-100 response at Week 12 were compared between placebo and PF-04236921 200 mg. CDAI is used to quantify the symptoms of patients with Crohn's Disease. CDAI evaluates 8 Crohn's disease-related variables during a 1-week assessment period, yielding a composite score \>=0 and without an upper limit. Many clinical trials use the endpoint for response as a 70 or greater point decrease in CDAI and clinical remission is often defined as a CDAI score below 150. The Outcome included a Generalized linear mixed model analyses which incorporated longitudinal data for each subject, and the same model is used for estimate (least squares mean) and statistical analysis (mean difference). Since the inputs in the model included different Analysis Population than in Outcome Measure 9, that will yield different estimates for placebo for the two different models.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12
Population: The analysis was performed on the FAS 200 mg vs placebo. The 200 mg arm was halted before reaching the planned sample size of approximately 60 participants. n signifies the number of subjects with observed data of each arm at each time point.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | The CDAI-100 Response Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo and PF-04236921 200 mg | Week 6 (n=58, 32) | 12.2 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | The CDAI-100 Response Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo and PF-04236921 200 mg | Week 8 (n=58, 29) | 21.3 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | The CDAI-100 Response Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo and PF-04236921 200 mg | Week 12 (n=57, 29) | 19.4 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | The CDAI-100 Response Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo and PF-04236921 200 mg | Week 10 (n=54, 29) | 18.2 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | The CDAI-100 Response Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo and PF-04236921 200 mg | Week 4 (n=66, 35) | 11.0 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | The CDAI-100 Response Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo and PF-04236921 200 mg | Week 2 (n=64, 36) | 10.3 Percentage of participants |
| PF-04236921 10 mg | The CDAI-100 Response Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo and PF-04236921 200 mg | Week 12 (n=57, 29) | 26.9 Percentage of participants |
| PF-04236921 10 mg | The CDAI-100 Response Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo and PF-04236921 200 mg | Week 2 (n=64, 36) | 12.0 Percentage of participants |
| PF-04236921 10 mg | The CDAI-100 Response Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo and PF-04236921 200 mg | Week 4 (n=66, 35) | 22.1 Percentage of participants |
| PF-04236921 10 mg | The CDAI-100 Response Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo and PF-04236921 200 mg | Week 8 (n=58, 29) | 18.7 Percentage of participants |
| PF-04236921 10 mg | The CDAI-100 Response Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo and PF-04236921 200 mg | Week 10 (n=54, 29) | 30.4 Percentage of participants |
| PF-04236921 10 mg | The CDAI-100 Response Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo and PF-04236921 200 mg | Week 6 (n=58, 32) | 22.2 Percentage of participants |
The CDAI-100 Response Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mg
CDAI-100 response was defined as a decrease in CDAI score of 100 or greater from baseline. The proportions of participants with CDAI-100 response at Week 12 were compared between placebo and PF-04236921 10 mg/50 mg. CDAI is used to quantify the symptoms of patients with Crohn's Disease. CDAI evaluates 8 Crohn's disease-related variables during a 1-week assessment period, yielding a composite score \>=0 and without an upper limit. Many clinical trials use the endpoint for response as a 70 or greater point decrease in CDAI and clinical remission is often defined as a CDAI score below 150. The Outcome included a Generalized linear mixed model analyses which incorporated longitudinal data for each subject, and the same model is used for estimate (least squares mean) and statistical analysis (mean difference).
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12
Population: The analysis was performed on the FAS excluding 200 mg arm (which was halted prematurely). n signifies the number of subjects with observed data of each arm at each time point.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | The CDAI-100 Response Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mg | Week 4 (n=66, 58, 59) | 13.0 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | The CDAI-100 Response Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mg | Week 10 (n=54, 50, 51) | 21.0 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | The CDAI-100 Response Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mg | Week 6 (n=58, 53, 60) | 14.5 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | The CDAI-100 Response Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mg | Week 2 (n=64, 63, 65) | 12.4 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | The CDAI-100 Response Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mg | Week 12 (n=57, 52, 54) | 22.2 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | The CDAI-100 Response Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mg | Week 8 (n=58, 53, 56) | 24.1 Percentage of participants |
| PF-04236921 10 mg | The CDAI-100 Response Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mg | Week 12 (n=57, 52, 54) | 32.7 Percentage of participants |
| PF-04236921 10 mg | The CDAI-100 Response Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mg | Week 2 (n=64, 63, 65) | 16.7 Percentage of participants |
| PF-04236921 10 mg | The CDAI-100 Response Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mg | Week 4 (n=66, 58, 59) | 18.1 Percentage of participants |
| PF-04236921 10 mg | The CDAI-100 Response Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mg | Week 6 (n=58, 53, 60) | 28.7 Percentage of participants |
| PF-04236921 10 mg | The CDAI-100 Response Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mg | Week 8 (n=58, 53, 56) | 26.5 Percentage of participants |
| PF-04236921 10 mg | The CDAI-100 Response Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mg | Week 10 (n=54, 50, 51) | 29.8 Percentage of participants |
| PF-04236921 50 mg | The CDAI-100 Response Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mg | Week 2 (n=64, 63, 65) | 12.6 Percentage of participants |
| PF-04236921 50 mg | The CDAI-100 Response Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mg | Week 10 (n=54, 50, 51) | 38.2 Percentage of participants |
| PF-04236921 50 mg | The CDAI-100 Response Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mg | Week 8 (n=58, 53, 56) | 37.9 Percentage of participants |
| PF-04236921 50 mg | The CDAI-100 Response Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mg | Week 4 (n=66, 58, 59) | 26.3 Percentage of participants |
| PF-04236921 50 mg | The CDAI-100 Response Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mg | Week 12 (n=57, 52, 54) | 36.2 Percentage of participants |
| PF-04236921 50 mg | The CDAI-100 Response Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mg | Week 6 (n=58, 53, 60) | 32.2 Percentage of participants |
The CDAI-70 Response Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo and PF-04236921 200 mg
CDAI-70 response was defined as a decrease in CDAI score of 70 or greater from baseline. The proportions of participants with CDAI-70 response were compared between placebo and PF-04236921 200 mg. CDAI is used to quantify the symptoms of patients with Crohn's Disease. CDAI evaluates 8 Crohn's disease-related variables during a 1-week assessment period, yielding a composite score \>=0 and without an upper limit. Many clinical trials use the endpoint for response as a 70 or greater point decrease in CDAI and clinical remission is often defined as a CDAI score below 150. The Outcome included a Generalized linear mixed model analyses which incorporated longitudinal data for each subject, and the same model is used for estimate (least squares mean) and statistical analysis (mean difference). Since the inputs in the model included different Analysis Population than in Outcome Measure 5, that will yield different estimates for placebo for the two different models.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 6, and 10
Population: The analysis was performed on the FAS 200 mg vs placebo. The 200 mg arm was halted before reaching the planned sample size of approximately 60 participants. n signifies the number of subjects with observed data of each arm at each time point.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | The CDAI-70 Response Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo and PF-04236921 200 mg | Week 2 (n=64, 36) | 11.2 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | The CDAI-70 Response Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo and PF-04236921 200 mg | Week 4 (n=66, 35) | 15.2 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | The CDAI-70 Response Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo and PF-04236921 200 mg | Week 6 (n=58, 32) | 19.5 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | The CDAI-70 Response Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo and PF-04236921 200 mg | Week 10 (n=54, 29) | 27.2 Percentage of participants |
| PF-04236921 10 mg | The CDAI-70 Response Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo and PF-04236921 200 mg | Week 10 (n=54, 29) | 46.3 Percentage of participants |
| PF-04236921 10 mg | The CDAI-70 Response Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo and PF-04236921 200 mg | Week 2 (n=64, 36) | 26.5 Percentage of participants |
| PF-04236921 10 mg | The CDAI-70 Response Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo and PF-04236921 200 mg | Week 6 (n=58, 32) | 27.2 Percentage of participants |
| PF-04236921 10 mg | The CDAI-70 Response Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo and PF-04236921 200 mg | Week 4 (n=66, 35) | 24.6 Percentage of participants |
The CDAI-70 Response Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mg
CDAI-70 response was defined as a decrease in CDAI score of 70 or greater from baseline. The proportions of participants with CDAI-70 response were compared between placebo and PF-04236921 10 mg/50 mg. CDAI is used to quantify the symptoms of patients with Crohn's Disease. CDAI evaluates 8 Crohn's disease-related variables during a 1-week assessment period, yielding a composite score \>=0 and without an upper limit. Many clinical trials use the endpoint for response as a 70 or greater point decrease in CDAI and clinical remission is often defined as a CDAI score below 150. The Outcome included a Generalized linear mixed model analyses which incorporated longitudinal data for each subject, and the same model is used for estimate (least squares mean) and statistical analysis (mean difference).
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 6, and 10
Population: The analysis was performed on the FAS excluding 200 mg arm (which was halted prematurely). n signifies the number of subjects with observed data of each arm at each time point.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | The CDAI-70 Response Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mg | Week 6 (n=58, 53, 60) | 21.1 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | The CDAI-70 Response Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mg | Week 2 (n=64, 63, 65) | 12.3 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | The CDAI-70 Response Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mg | Week 10 (n=54, 50, 51) | 29.3 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | The CDAI-70 Response Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mg | Week 4 (n=66, 58, 59) | 16.5 Percentage of participants |
| PF-04236921 10 mg | The CDAI-70 Response Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mg | Week 6 (n=58, 53, 60) | 35.0 Percentage of participants |
| PF-04236921 10 mg | The CDAI-70 Response Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mg | Week 4 (n=66, 58, 59) | 34.6 Percentage of participants |
| PF-04236921 10 mg | The CDAI-70 Response Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mg | Week 2 (n=64, 63, 65) | 19.4 Percentage of participants |
| PF-04236921 10 mg | The CDAI-70 Response Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mg | Week 10 (n=54, 50, 51) | 38.9 Percentage of participants |
| PF-04236921 50 mg | The CDAI-70 Response Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mg | Week 10 (n=54, 50, 51) | 54.0 Percentage of participants |
| PF-04236921 50 mg | The CDAI-70 Response Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mg | Week 2 (n=64, 63, 65) | 18.1 Percentage of participants |
| PF-04236921 50 mg | The CDAI-70 Response Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mg | Week 4 (n=66, 58, 59) | 37.0 Percentage of participants |
| PF-04236921 50 mg | The CDAI-70 Response Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mg | Week 6 (n=58, 53, 60) | 46.2 Percentage of participants |
The CDAI Remission Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo and PF-04236921 200 mg
CDAI remission rate was defined as an absolute CDAI score \<150. The proportions of participants with CDAI remission were compared between placebo and PF-04236921 200 mg. CDAI is used to quantify the symptoms of patients with Crohn's Disease. CDAI evaluates 8 Crohn's disease-related variables during a 1-week assessment period, yielding a composite score \>=0 and without an upper limit. Many clinical trials use the endpoint for response as a 70 or greater point decrease in CDAI and clinical remission is often defined as a CDAI score below 150. The Outcome included a Generalized linear mixed model analyses which incorporated longitudinal data for each subject, and the same model is used for estimate (least squares mean) and statistical analysis (mean difference). Since the inputs in the model included different Analysis Population than in Outcome Measure 7, that will yield different estimates for placebo for the two different models.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12
Population: The analysis was performed on the FAS 200 mg vs placebo. The 200 mg arm was halted before reaching the planned sample size of approximately 60 participants. n signifies the number of subjects with observed data of each arm at each time point.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | The CDAI Remission Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo and PF-04236921 200 mg | Week 2 (n=64, 36) | 1.1 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | The CDAI Remission Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo and PF-04236921 200 mg | Week 12 (n=57, 29) | 7.8 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | The CDAI Remission Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo and PF-04236921 200 mg | Week 4 (n=66, 35) | 2.4 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | The CDAI Remission Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo and PF-04236921 200 mg | Week 10 (n=54, 29) | 9.4 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | The CDAI Remission Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo and PF-04236921 200 mg | Week 8 (n=58, 29) | 11.9 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | The CDAI Remission Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo and PF-04236921 200 mg | Week 6 (n=58, 32) | 6.1 Percentage of participants |
| PF-04236921 10 mg | The CDAI Remission Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo and PF-04236921 200 mg | Week 12 (n=57, 29) | 11.8 Percentage of participants |
| PF-04236921 10 mg | The CDAI Remission Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo and PF-04236921 200 mg | Week 2 (n=64, 36) | 6.9 Percentage of participants |
| PF-04236921 10 mg | The CDAI Remission Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo and PF-04236921 200 mg | Week 4 (n=66, 35) | 5.1 Percentage of participants |
| PF-04236921 10 mg | The CDAI Remission Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo and PF-04236921 200 mg | Week 6 (n=58, 32) | 8.8 Percentage of participants |
| PF-04236921 10 mg | The CDAI Remission Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo and PF-04236921 200 mg | Week 8 (n=58, 29) | 8.8 Percentage of participants |
| PF-04236921 10 mg | The CDAI Remission Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo and PF-04236921 200 mg | Week 10 (n=54, 29) | 14.8 Percentage of participants |
The CDAI Remission Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mg
CDAI remission rate was defined as an absolute CDAI score less than (\<) 150. The proportions of participants with CDAI remission were compared between placebo and PF-04236921 10 mg/50 mg. CDAI is used to quantify the symptoms of patients with Crohn's Disease. CDAI evaluates 8 Crohn's disease-related variables during a 1-week assessment period, yielding a composite score \>=0 and without an upper limit. Many clinical trials use the endpoint for response as a 70 or greater point decrease in CDAI and clinical remission is often defined as a CDAI score below 150. The Outcome included a Generalized linear mixed model analyses which incorporated longitudinal data for each subject, and the same model is used for estimate (least squares mean) and statistical analysis (mean difference).
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12
Population: The analysis was performed on the FAS excluding 200 mg arm (which was halted prematurely). n signifies the number of subjects with observed data of each arm at each time point.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | The CDAI Remission Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mg | Week 2 (n=64, 63, 68) | 1.6 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | The CDAI Remission Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mg | Week 4 (n=66, 58, 62) | 3.4 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | The CDAI Remission Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mg | Week 6 (n=58, 53, 63) | 8.5 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | The CDAI Remission Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mg | Week 8 (n=58, 53, 58) | 16.3 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | The CDAI Remission Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mg | Week 10 (n=54, 50, 54) | 13.1 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | The CDAI Remission Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mg | Week 12 (n=57, 52, 57) | 10.9 Percentage of participants |
| PF-04236921 10 mg | The CDAI Remission Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mg | Week 4 (n=66, 58, 62) | 4.1 Percentage of participants |
| PF-04236921 10 mg | The CDAI Remission Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mg | Week 8 (n=58, 53, 58) | 10.8 Percentage of participants |
| PF-04236921 10 mg | The CDAI Remission Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mg | Week 12 (n=57, 52, 57) | 10.8 Percentage of participants |
| PF-04236921 10 mg | The CDAI Remission Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mg | Week 6 (n=58, 53, 63) | 7.3 Percentage of participants |
| PF-04236921 10 mg | The CDAI Remission Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mg | Week 2 (n=64, 63, 68) | 3.6 Percentage of participants |
| PF-04236921 10 mg | The CDAI Remission Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mg | Week 10 (n=54, 50, 54) | 19.9 Percentage of participants |
| PF-04236921 50 mg | The CDAI Remission Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mg | Week 4 (n=66, 58, 62) | 19.7 Percentage of participants |
| PF-04236921 50 mg | The CDAI Remission Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mg | Week 10 (n=54, 50, 54) | 30.9 Percentage of participants |
| PF-04236921 50 mg | The CDAI Remission Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mg | Week 6 (n=58, 53, 63) | 23.4 Percentage of participants |
| PF-04236921 50 mg | The CDAI Remission Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mg | Week 12 (n=57, 52, 57) | 27.4 Percentage of participants |
| PF-04236921 50 mg | The CDAI Remission Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mg | Week 2 (n=64, 63, 68) | 9.6 Percentage of participants |
| PF-04236921 50 mg | The CDAI Remission Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mg | Week 8 (n=58, 53, 58) | 24.9 Percentage of participants |