Skip to content

A Study To Assess The Efficacy And Safety Of PF-04236921 In Subjects With Crohn's Disease Who Failed Anti-TNF Therapy

A Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Dose-ranging Study To Evaluate The Efficacy And Safety Of Pf-04236921 In Subjects With Crohn's Disease Who Are Anti-tnf Inadequate Responders (Andante)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01287897
Acronym
ANDANTE
Enrollment
250
Registered
2011-02-02
Start date
2011-02-28
Completion date
2015-02-28
Last updated
2016-01-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Crohn's Disease

Keywords

Crohn's Disease, safety, efficacy, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI)

Brief summary

This is a proof of concept study to determine the efficacy and safety of a monoclonal antibody with three doses versus placebo. Subjects will be randomized to a treatment and the dose will be delivered subcutaneously twice, 4 weeks apart. All subjects will have moderate to severe refractory Crohn's Disease.

Interventions

DRUGPF-04236921 SC injection

Placebo delivered SC, 2 doses separated by 4 weeks

Sponsors

Pfizer
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subjects must have failed or are intolerant to anti TNFs * hsCRP greater or equal to 5.0 mg/L * Ulcerations demonstrated by colonoscopy as defined by SES CD assessment performed within 8 weeks of study entry (screening) and able to retrospectively complete the SES-CD or colonoscopy performed during screening

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnant or breastfeeding women * Crohn's Disease with active fistulae or abscess * History of diverticulitis or symptomatic diverticulosis * Abnormality in hematology or chemistry profiles at screening

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI)-70 Response Rate at Week 8 in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mgBaseline and Week 8CDAI-70 response was defined as a decrease in CDAI score of 70 or greater from baseline. The proportions of participants with CDAI-70 response at Week 8 were compared between placebo and PF-04236921 10 mg/50 mg. CDAI is used to quantify the symptoms of patients with Crohn's Disease. CDAI evaluates 8 Crohn's disease-related variables during a 1-week assessment period, yielding a composite score greater than or equal to (\>=) 0 and without an upper limit. Many clinical trials use the endpoint for response as a 70 or greater point decrease in CDAI and clinical remission is often defined as a CDAI score below 150. The Outcome included a Generalized linear mixed model analyses which incorporated longitudinal data for each subject, and the same model is used for estimate (least squares mean) and statistical analysis (mean difference).
The CDAI-70 Response Rate at Week 8 in Participants Who Received Placebo and PF-04236921 200 mgBaseline and Week 8CDAI-70 response was defined as a decrease in CDAI score of 70 or greater from baseline. The proportions of participants with CDAI-70 response at Week 8 were compared between placebo and PF-04236921 200 mg. CDAI is used to quantify the symptoms of patients with Crohn's Disease. CDAI evaluates 8 Crohn's disease-related variables during a 1-week assessment period, yielding a composite score \>=0 and without an upper limit. Many clinical trials use the endpoint for response as a 70 or greater point decrease in CDAI and clinical remission is often defined as a CDAI score below 150. The Outcome included a Generalized linear mixed model analyses which incorporated longitudinal data for each subject, and the same model is used for estimate (least squares mean) and statistical analysis (mean difference). Since the inputs in the model included different Analysis Population than in Outcome Measure 1, that will yield different estimates for placebo for the two different models.
The CDAI-70 Response Rate at Week 12 in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mgBaseline and Week 12CDAI-70 response was defined as a decrease in CDAI score of 70 or greater from baseline. The proportions of participants with CDAI-70 response at Week 12 were compared between placebo and and PF-04236921 10 mg/50 mg. CDAI is used to quantify the symptoms of patients with Crohn's Disease. CDAI evaluates 8 Crohn's disease-related variables during a 1-week assessment period, yielding a composite score \>=0 and without an upper limit. Many clinical trials use the endpoint for response as a 70 or greater point decrease in CDAI and clinical remission is often defined as a CDAI score below 150. The Outcome included a Generalized linear mixed model analyses which incorporated longitudinal data for each subject, and the same model is used for estimate (least squares mean) and statistical analysis (mean difference).
The CDAI-70 Response Rate at Week 12 in Participants Who Received Placebo and PF-04236921 200 mgBaseline and Week 12CDAI-70 response was defined as a decrease in CDAI score of 70 or greater from baseline. The proportions of participants with CDAI-70 response at Week 12 were compared between placebo and PF-04236921 200 mg. CDAI is used to quantify the symptoms of patients with Crohn's Disease. CDAI evaluates 8 Crohn's disease-related variables during a 1-week assessment period, yielding a composite score \>=0 and without an upper limit. Many clinical trials use the endpoint for response as a 70 or greater point decrease in CDAI and clinical remission is often defined as a CDAI score below 150. The Outcome included a Generalized linear mixed model analyses which incorporated longitudinal data for each subject, and the same model is used for estimate (least squares mean) and statistical analysis (mean difference). Since the inputs in the model included different Analysis Population than in Outcome Measure 3, that will yield different estimates for placebo for the two different models.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The CDAI Remission Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo and PF-04236921 200 mgBaseline and Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12CDAI remission rate was defined as an absolute CDAI score \<150. The proportions of participants with CDAI remission were compared between placebo and PF-04236921 200 mg. CDAI is used to quantify the symptoms of patients with Crohn's Disease. CDAI evaluates 8 Crohn's disease-related variables during a 1-week assessment period, yielding a composite score \>=0 and without an upper limit. Many clinical trials use the endpoint for response as a 70 or greater point decrease in CDAI and clinical remission is often defined as a CDAI score below 150. The Outcome included a Generalized linear mixed model analyses which incorporated longitudinal data for each subject, and the same model is used for estimate (least squares mean) and statistical analysis (mean difference). Since the inputs in the model included different Analysis Population than in Outcome Measure 7, that will yield different estimates for placebo for the two different models.
The CDAI-100 Response Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mgBaseline and Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12CDAI-100 response was defined as a decrease in CDAI score of 100 or greater from baseline. The proportions of participants with CDAI-100 response at Week 12 were compared between placebo and PF-04236921 10 mg/50 mg. CDAI is used to quantify the symptoms of patients with Crohn's Disease. CDAI evaluates 8 Crohn's disease-related variables during a 1-week assessment period, yielding a composite score \>=0 and without an upper limit. Many clinical trials use the endpoint for response as a 70 or greater point decrease in CDAI and clinical remission is often defined as a CDAI score below 150. The Outcome included a Generalized linear mixed model analyses which incorporated longitudinal data for each subject, and the same model is used for estimate (least squares mean) and statistical analysis (mean difference).
The CDAI-100 Response Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo and PF-04236921 200 mgBaseline and Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12CDAI-100 response was defined as a decrease in CDAI score of 100 or greater from baseline. The proportions of participants with CDAI-100 response at Week 12 were compared between placebo and PF-04236921 200 mg. CDAI is used to quantify the symptoms of patients with Crohn's Disease. CDAI evaluates 8 Crohn's disease-related variables during a 1-week assessment period, yielding a composite score \>=0 and without an upper limit. Many clinical trials use the endpoint for response as a 70 or greater point decrease in CDAI and clinical remission is often defined as a CDAI score below 150. The Outcome included a Generalized linear mixed model analyses which incorporated longitudinal data for each subject, and the same model is used for estimate (least squares mean) and statistical analysis (mean difference). Since the inputs in the model included different Analysis Population than in Outcome Measure 9, that will yield different estimates for placebo for the two different models.
Change From Baseline in CDAI Score Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mgBaseline and Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12CDAI evaluates 8 Crohn's disease-related variables during a 1-week assessment period, yielding a composite score \>=0 and without an upper limit, and higher score indicate more severe disease. The Outcome included a Linear mixed model analyses which incorporated longitudinal data for each subject, and the same model is used for estimate (least squares mean) and statistical analysis (mean difference).
The CDAI-70 Response Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mgBaseline and Weeks 2, 4, 6, and 10CDAI-70 response was defined as a decrease in CDAI score of 70 or greater from baseline. The proportions of participants with CDAI-70 response were compared between placebo and PF-04236921 10 mg/50 mg. CDAI is used to quantify the symptoms of patients with Crohn's Disease. CDAI evaluates 8 Crohn's disease-related variables during a 1-week assessment period, yielding a composite score \>=0 and without an upper limit. Many clinical trials use the endpoint for response as a 70 or greater point decrease in CDAI and clinical remission is often defined as a CDAI score below 150. The Outcome included a Generalized linear mixed model analyses which incorporated longitudinal data for each subject, and the same model is used for estimate (least squares mean) and statistical analysis (mean difference).
Percentages of Participants With Confirmed Positive Neutralizing Antibodies (NAbs)At baseline (Day 1) and at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 32 and 40The percentage of participants with confirmed positive NAbs was summarized for each treatment arm. Only ADA positive samples were analyzed for Nab. A multi-tiered approach was utilized to detect NAbs. NAb serum samples were screened at tier one, and those found presumptively NAb positive was further tested with the confirmatory assay (tier two). The percentage of subjects with confirmed positive NAbs was summarized for each treatment.
Serum PF-04236921 Concentration Over TimeDay 1 (predose), and at Weeks 2, 4 (Day 28, predose), 8, 10, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, and 40
Number of Participants Who Withdrew From the Study Due to Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs)Induction period: from Week 0 (Day 1) through Week 12; follow-up period: from Week 12 (or discontinuation from the induction period) through last subject visit (up to 28 weeks after completion of or discontinuation from the 12-week induction period)An AE was any untoward medical occurrence without regard to causality in a participant who received study drug. Treatment-emergent were events between first dose of treatment and up to 28 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state.
Percentages of Participants With Confirmed Positive Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs)At baseline (Day 1) and at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 32 and 40The percentage of participants with confirmed positive ADA was summarized for each treatment arm. ADA positive was defined as ADA titer defined as ADA titer (ie, the reciprocal of the highest dilution that gives a value equivalent to the cut point of the assay) \>= 4.32.
The CDAI-70 Response Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo and PF-04236921 200 mgBaseline and Weeks 2, 4, 6, and 10CDAI-70 response was defined as a decrease in CDAI score of 70 or greater from baseline. The proportions of participants with CDAI-70 response were compared between placebo and PF-04236921 200 mg. CDAI is used to quantify the symptoms of patients with Crohn's Disease. CDAI evaluates 8 Crohn's disease-related variables during a 1-week assessment period, yielding a composite score \>=0 and without an upper limit. Many clinical trials use the endpoint for response as a 70 or greater point decrease in CDAI and clinical remission is often defined as a CDAI score below 150. The Outcome included a Generalized linear mixed model analyses which incorporated longitudinal data for each subject, and the same model is used for estimate (least squares mean) and statistical analysis (mean difference). Since the inputs in the model included different Analysis Population than in Outcome Measure 5, that will yield different estimates for placebo for the two different models.
Change From Baseline in CDAI Score Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo and PF-04236921 200 mgBaseline and Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12CDAI evaluates 8 Crohn's disease-related variables during a 1-week assessment period, yielding a composite score \>=0 and without an upper limit, and higher score indicate more severe disease. The Outcome included a Linear mixed model analyses which incorporated longitudinal data for each subject, and the same model is used for estimate (least squares mean) and statistical analysis (mean difference). Since the inputs in the model included different Analysis Population than in Outcome Measure 11, that will yield different estimates for placebo for the two different models.
The CDAI Remission Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mgBaseline and Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12CDAI remission rate was defined as an absolute CDAI score less than (\<) 150. The proportions of participants with CDAI remission were compared between placebo and PF-04236921 10 mg/50 mg. CDAI is used to quantify the symptoms of patients with Crohn's Disease. CDAI evaluates 8 Crohn's disease-related variables during a 1-week assessment period, yielding a composite score \>=0 and without an upper limit. Many clinical trials use the endpoint for response as a 70 or greater point decrease in CDAI and clinical remission is often defined as a CDAI score below 150. The Outcome included a Generalized linear mixed model analyses which incorporated longitudinal data for each subject, and the same model is used for estimate (least squares mean) and statistical analysis (mean difference).

Countries

Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Czechia, Denmark, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Israel, Italy, New Zealand, Romania, Switzerland, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This study included a 28-day screening period, an induction period (Week 0-12) and a 28-week follow-up period. Participants who completed the induction treatment period could enter the follow-up period or an open-label extension study, NCT01345318. Participants who discontinued treatment during the induction period could enter the follow-up period.

Pre-assignment details

A total of 250 participants were randomized via Interactive Voice Response System (IVRS); of which, 247 received investigational product and 3 were randomized inadvertently and not dosed (2 did not meet entrance criteria and 1 did not consent properly and was not included in clinical database because the randomization page was not completed).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
Placebo administered SC in the anterolateral right and left thighs on Day 1 and Day 28. Each participant received 2 injections due to the double-dummy design of the study.
69
PF-04236921 10 mg
PF-04236921 10 mg administered SC in the anterolateral right and left thighs on Day 1 and Day 28. Each participant received 2 injections due to the double-dummy design of the study.
67
PF-04236921 50 mg
PF-04236921 50 mg administered SC in the anterolateral right and left thighs on Day 1 and Day 28. Each participant received 2 injections due to the double-dummy design of the study.
71
PF-04236921 200 mg
PF-04236921 200 mg administered SC in the anterolateral right and left thighs on Day 1 and Day 28. Each participant received 2 injections due to the double-dummy design of the study.
40
Total247

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Overall StudyAdverse Event5364
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy2000
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up0020
Overall StudyNot consented properly0100
Overall StudyNot meeting entrance criteria1100
Overall StudyOther1010
Overall StudyProtocol Violation1101
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject1532

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlaceboPF-04236921 10 mgPF-04236921 50 mgPF-04236921 200 mgTotal
Age, Continuous38.4 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.6
38.9 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.9
38.9 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.1
42.2 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.2
39.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.2
Sex: Female, Male
Female
38 Participants34 Participants44 Participants25 Participants141 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
31 Participants33 Participants27 Participants15 Participants106 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
36 / 6938 / 6748 / 7120 / 40
serious
Total, serious adverse events
11 / 6911 / 6712 / 7111 / 40

Outcome results

Primary

The CDAI-70 Response Rate at Week 12 in Participants Who Received Placebo and PF-04236921 200 mg

CDAI-70 response was defined as a decrease in CDAI score of 70 or greater from baseline. The proportions of participants with CDAI-70 response at Week 12 were compared between placebo and PF-04236921 200 mg. CDAI is used to quantify the symptoms of patients with Crohn's Disease. CDAI evaluates 8 Crohn's disease-related variables during a 1-week assessment period, yielding a composite score \>=0 and without an upper limit. Many clinical trials use the endpoint for response as a 70 or greater point decrease in CDAI and clinical remission is often defined as a CDAI score below 150. The Outcome included a Generalized linear mixed model analyses which incorporated longitudinal data for each subject, and the same model is used for estimate (least squares mean) and statistical analysis (mean difference). Since the inputs in the model included different Analysis Population than in Outcome Measure 3, that will yield different estimates for placebo for the two different models.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: The analysis was performed on FAS 200 mg vs placebo. The 200 mg arm was halted before reaching the planned sample size of approximately 60 and was no longer powered at the planned level to test against placebo. Thus, the 200 mg vs placebo comparison is a sensitivity analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
PlaceboThe CDAI-70 Response Rate at Week 12 in Participants Who Received Placebo and PF-04236921 200 mg26.7 Percentage of participants
PF-04236921 10 mgThe CDAI-70 Response Rate at Week 12 in Participants Who Received Placebo and PF-04236921 200 mg41.7 Percentage of participants
p-value: 0.136290% CI: [-7.5, 37.6]GLMM
Primary

The CDAI-70 Response Rate at Week 12 in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mg

CDAI-70 response was defined as a decrease in CDAI score of 70 or greater from baseline. The proportions of participants with CDAI-70 response at Week 12 were compared between placebo and and PF-04236921 10 mg/50 mg. CDAI is used to quantify the symptoms of patients with Crohn's Disease. CDAI evaluates 8 Crohn's disease-related variables during a 1-week assessment period, yielding a composite score \>=0 and without an upper limit. Many clinical trials use the endpoint for response as a 70 or greater point decrease in CDAI and clinical remission is often defined as a CDAI score below 150. The Outcome included a Generalized linear mixed model analyses which incorporated longitudinal data for each subject, and the same model is used for estimate (least squares mean) and statistical analysis (mean difference).

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: Primary analysis: FAS excluding 200 mg arm (halted prematurely before reaching the planned sample size and thus no longer powered at the planned level to test against placebo).

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
PlaceboThe CDAI-70 Response Rate at Week 12 in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mg28.6 Percentage of participants
PF-04236921 10 mgThe CDAI-70 Response Rate at Week 12 in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mg35.2 Percentage of participants
PF-04236921 50 mgThe CDAI-70 Response Rate at Week 12 in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mg47.4 Percentage of participants
p-value: 0.262790% CI: [-10.6, 23.9]GLMM
p-value: 0.042590% CI: [0.8, 36.7]GLMM
Primary

The CDAI-70 Response Rate at Week 8 in Participants Who Received Placebo and PF-04236921 200 mg

CDAI-70 response was defined as a decrease in CDAI score of 70 or greater from baseline. The proportions of participants with CDAI-70 response at Week 8 were compared between placebo and PF-04236921 200 mg. CDAI is used to quantify the symptoms of patients with Crohn's Disease. CDAI evaluates 8 Crohn's disease-related variables during a 1-week assessment period, yielding a composite score \>=0 and without an upper limit. Many clinical trials use the endpoint for response as a 70 or greater point decrease in CDAI and clinical remission is often defined as a CDAI score below 150. The Outcome included a Generalized linear mixed model analyses which incorporated longitudinal data for each subject, and the same model is used for estimate (least squares mean) and statistical analysis (mean difference). Since the inputs in the model included different Analysis Population than in Outcome Measure 1, that will yield different estimates for placebo for the two different models.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 8

Population: The analysis was performed on FAS participants of the 200 mg and placebo arms, referred to as FAS 200 mg versus (vs) placebo. The 200 mg arm was halted before reaching the planned sample size of approximately 60 and was no longer powered at the planned level to test against placebo. Thus, the 200 mg vs placebo comparison is a sensitivity analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
PlaceboThe CDAI-70 Response Rate at Week 8 in Participants Who Received Placebo and PF-04236921 200 mg28.8 Percentage of participants
PF-04236921 10 mgThe CDAI-70 Response Rate at Week 8 in Participants Who Received Placebo and PF-04236921 200 mg39.0 Percentage of participants
p-value: 0.225890% CI: [-12.1, 32.6]GLMM
Primary

The Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI)-70 Response Rate at Week 8 in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mg

CDAI-70 response was defined as a decrease in CDAI score of 70 or greater from baseline. The proportions of participants with CDAI-70 response at Week 8 were compared between placebo and PF-04236921 10 mg/50 mg. CDAI is used to quantify the symptoms of patients with Crohn's Disease. CDAI evaluates 8 Crohn's disease-related variables during a 1-week assessment period, yielding a composite score greater than or equal to (\>=) 0 and without an upper limit. Many clinical trials use the endpoint for response as a 70 or greater point decrease in CDAI and clinical remission is often defined as a CDAI score below 150. The Outcome included a Generalized linear mixed model analyses which incorporated longitudinal data for each subject, and the same model is used for estimate (least squares mean) and statistical analysis (mean difference).

Time frame: Baseline and Week 8

Population: Primary analysis: full analysis set (FAS, defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment; 2 participants \[10 mg arm\] excluded due to a quality issue) excluding 200 mg (halted prematurely before reaching the planned sample size and thus no longer powered at the planned level to test against placebo).

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
PlaceboThe Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI)-70 Response Rate at Week 8 in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mg30.6 Percentage of participants
PF-04236921 10 mgThe Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI)-70 Response Rate at Week 8 in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mg35.0 Percentage of participants
PF-04236921 50 mgThe Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI)-70 Response Rate at Week 8 in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mg49.3 Percentage of participants
p-value: 0.340690% CI: [-13, 21.7]Generalized linear mixed model (GLMM)
p-value: 0.043890% CI: [0.7, 36.7]GLMM
Secondary

Change From Baseline in CDAI Score Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo and PF-04236921 200 mg

CDAI evaluates 8 Crohn's disease-related variables during a 1-week assessment period, yielding a composite score \>=0 and without an upper limit, and higher score indicate more severe disease. The Outcome included a Linear mixed model analyses which incorporated longitudinal data for each subject, and the same model is used for estimate (least squares mean) and statistical analysis (mean difference). Since the inputs in the model included different Analysis Population than in Outcome Measure 11, that will yield different estimates for placebo for the two different models.

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12

Population: The analysis was performed on the FAS 200 mg vs placebo. The 200 mg arm was halted before reaching the planned sample size of approximately 60 participants. n signifies the number of subjects with observed data of each arm at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
PlaceboChange From Baseline in CDAI Score Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo and PF-04236921 200 mgWeek 4 (n=66, 35)-26.6 points on a scale
PlaceboChange From Baseline in CDAI Score Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo and PF-04236921 200 mgWeek 8 (n=58, 29)-39.1 points on a scale
PlaceboChange From Baseline in CDAI Score Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo and PF-04236921 200 mgWeek 6 (n=58, 32)-36.7 points on a scale
PlaceboChange From Baseline in CDAI Score Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo and PF-04236921 200 mgWeek 10 (n=54, 29)-26.3 points on a scale
PlaceboChange From Baseline in CDAI Score Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo and PF-04236921 200 mgWeek 12 (n=57, 29)-35.2 points on a scale
PlaceboChange From Baseline in CDAI Score Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo and PF-04236921 200 mgWeek 2 (n=64, 36)-21.3 points on a scale
PF-04236921 10 mgChange From Baseline in CDAI Score Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo and PF-04236921 200 mgWeek 12 (n=57, 29)-66.2 points on a scale
PF-04236921 10 mgChange From Baseline in CDAI Score Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo and PF-04236921 200 mgWeek 10 (n=54, 29)-56.1 points on a scale
PF-04236921 10 mgChange From Baseline in CDAI Score Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo and PF-04236921 200 mgWeek 2 (n=64, 36)-30.1 points on a scale
PF-04236921 10 mgChange From Baseline in CDAI Score Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo and PF-04236921 200 mgWeek 4 (n=66, 35)-30.5 points on a scale
PF-04236921 10 mgChange From Baseline in CDAI Score Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo and PF-04236921 200 mgWeek 6 (n=58, 32)-42.2 points on a scale
PF-04236921 10 mgChange From Baseline in CDAI Score Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo and PF-04236921 200 mgWeek 8 (n=58, 29)-48.1 points on a scale
Comparison: LSM difference from placebo in change from baseline in CDAI score for the 200-mg arm at Week 2.p-value: 0.315790% CI: [-39, 21.4]LMM
Comparison: LSM difference from placebo in change from baseline in CDAI score for the 200-mg arm at Week 4.p-value: 0.417190% CI: [-34, 26.4]LMM
Comparison: LSM difference from placebo in change from baseline in CDAI score for the 200-mg arm at Week 6.p-value: 0.383790% CI: [-36.6, 25.5]LMM
Comparison: LSM difference from placebo in change from baseline in CDAI score for the 200-mg arm at Week 8.p-value: 0.320490% CI: [-40.8, 22.8]LMM
Comparison: LSM difference from placebo in change from baseline in CDAI score for the 200-mg arm at Week 10.p-value: 0.064990% CI: [-62.3, 2.6]LMM
Comparison: LSM difference from placebo in change from baseline in CDAI score for the 200-mg arm at Week 12.p-value: 0.059890% CI: [-63.9, 1.8]LMM
Secondary

Change From Baseline in CDAI Score Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mg

CDAI evaluates 8 Crohn's disease-related variables during a 1-week assessment period, yielding a composite score \>=0 and without an upper limit, and higher score indicate more severe disease. The Outcome included a Linear mixed model analyses which incorporated longitudinal data for each subject, and the same model is used for estimate (least squares mean) and statistical analysis (mean difference).

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12

Population: The analysis was performed on the FAS excluding 200 mg arm (which was halted prematurely). n signifies the number of subjects with observed data of each arm at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
PlaceboChange From Baseline in CDAI Score Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mgWeek 2 (n=64, 63, 65)-18.9 points on a scale
PlaceboChange From Baseline in CDAI Score Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mgWeek 10 (n=54, 50, 51)-19.8 points on a scale
PlaceboChange From Baseline in CDAI Score Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mgWeek 8 (n=58, 53, 56)-34.6 points on a scale
PlaceboChange From Baseline in CDAI Score Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mgWeek 6 (n=58, 53, 60)-32.6 points on a scale
PlaceboChange From Baseline in CDAI Score Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mgWeek 4 (n=66, 58, 59)-25.1 points on a scale
PlaceboChange From Baseline in CDAI Score Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mgWeek 12 (n=57, 52, 54)-27.3 points on a scale
PF-04236921 10 mgChange From Baseline in CDAI Score Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mgWeek 2 (n=64, 63, 65)-28.4 points on a scale
PF-04236921 10 mgChange From Baseline in CDAI Score Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mgWeek 4 (n=66, 58, 59)-37.1 points on a scale
PF-04236921 10 mgChange From Baseline in CDAI Score Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mgWeek 6 (n=58, 53, 60)-48.5 points on a scale
PF-04236921 10 mgChange From Baseline in CDAI Score Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mgWeek 8 (n=58, 53, 56)-49.6 points on a scale
PF-04236921 10 mgChange From Baseline in CDAI Score Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mgWeek 10 (n=54, 50, 51)-50.0 points on a scale
PF-04236921 10 mgChange From Baseline in CDAI Score Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mgWeek 12 (n=57, 52, 54)-44.2 points on a scale
PF-04236921 50 mgChange From Baseline in CDAI Score Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mgWeek 6 (n=58, 53, 60)-54.9 points on a scale
PF-04236921 50 mgChange From Baseline in CDAI Score Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mgWeek 2 (n=64, 63, 65)-16.2 points on a scale
PF-04236921 50 mgChange From Baseline in CDAI Score Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mgWeek 10 (n=54, 50, 51)-64.7 points on a scale
PF-04236921 50 mgChange From Baseline in CDAI Score Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mgWeek 12 (n=57, 52, 54)-66.8 points on a scale
PF-04236921 50 mgChange From Baseline in CDAI Score Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mgWeek 4 (n=66, 58, 59)-50.7 points on a scale
PF-04236921 50 mgChange From Baseline in CDAI Score Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mgWeek 8 (n=58, 53, 56)-63.5 points on a scale
Comparison: LSM difference from placebo in change from baseline in CDAI score for the 10-mg arm at Week 2.p-value: 0.217390% CI: [-29.8, 10.6]Linear mixed model (LMM)
Comparison: LSM difference from placebo in change from baseline in CDAI score for the 10-mg arm at Week 4.p-value: 0.177890% CI: [-33.4, 9.4]LMM
Comparison: LSM difference from placebo in change from baseline in CDAI score for the 10-mg arm at Week 6.p-value: 0.166190% CI: [-43, 11.2]LMM
Comparison: LSM difference from placebo in change from baseline in CDAI score for the 10-mg arm at Week 8.p-value: 0.199390% CI: [-44.1, 14.3]LMM
Comparison: LSM difference from placebo in change from baseline in CDAI score for the 10-mg arm at Week 10.p-value: 0.063290% CI: [-62.7, 2.3]LMM
Comparison: LSM difference from placebo in change from baseline in CDAI score for the 10-mg arm at Week 12.p-value: 0.197590% CI: [-49.4, 15.8]LMM
Comparison: LSM difference from placebo in change from baseline in CDAI score for the 50-mg arm at Week 2.p-value: 0.586890% CI: [-17.6, 22.9]LMM
Comparison: LSM difference from placebo in change from baseline in CDAI score for the 50-mg arm at Week 4.p-value: 0.024390% CI: [-47, -4.3]LMM
Comparison: LSM difference from placebo in change from baseline in CDAI score for the 50-mg arm at Week 6.p-value: 0.083490% CI: [-49, 4.3]LMM
Comparison: LSM difference from placebo in change from baseline in CDAI score for the 50-mg arm at Week 8.p-value: 0.049990% CI: [-57.7, 0]LMM
Comparison: LSM difference from placebo in change from baseline in CDAI score for the 50-mg arm at Week 10.p-value: 0.011190% CI: [-77.1, -12.7]LMM
Comparison: LSM difference from placebo in change from baseline in CDAI score for the 50-mg arm at Week 12.p-value: 0.022190% CI: [-71.7, -7.3]LMM
Secondary

Number of Participants Who Withdrew From the Study Due to Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs)

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence without regard to causality in a participant who received study drug. Treatment-emergent were events between first dose of treatment and up to 28 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state.

Time frame: Induction period: from Week 0 (Day 1) through Week 12; follow-up period: from Week 12 (or discontinuation from the induction period) through last subject visit (up to 28 weeks after completion of or discontinuation from the 12-week induction period)

Population: The SAS consisted of all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. n signifies number of participants with observed data at the time point of each arm. From Weeks 16 to 40, only participants who remained in the follow-up period of this study and did not enter NCT01405196 were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboNumber of Participants Who Withdrew From the Study Due to Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs)Induction period (Weeks 0 to 12)7 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Who Withdrew From the Study Due to Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs)Follow-up period (after Week 12)0 participants
PF-04236921 10 mgNumber of Participants Who Withdrew From the Study Due to Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs)Follow-up period (after Week 12)0 participants
PF-04236921 10 mgNumber of Participants Who Withdrew From the Study Due to Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs)Induction period (Weeks 0 to 12)6 participants
PF-04236921 50 mgNumber of Participants Who Withdrew From the Study Due to Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs)Induction period (Weeks 0 to 12)6 participants
PF-04236921 50 mgNumber of Participants Who Withdrew From the Study Due to Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs)Follow-up period (after Week 12)0 participants
PF-04236921 200 mgNumber of Participants Who Withdrew From the Study Due to Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs)Induction period (Weeks 0 to 12)8 participants
PF-04236921 200 mgNumber of Participants Who Withdrew From the Study Due to Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs)Follow-up period (after Week 12)0 participants
Secondary

Percentages of Participants With Confirmed Positive Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs)

The percentage of participants with confirmed positive ADA was summarized for each treatment arm. ADA positive was defined as ADA titer defined as ADA titer (ie, the reciprocal of the highest dilution that gives a value equivalent to the cut point of the assay) \>= 4.32.

Time frame: At baseline (Day 1) and at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 32 and 40

Population: The SAS consisted of all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. n signifies number of participants with observed data at the time point of each arm. From Weeks 16 to 40, only participants who remained in the follow-up period of this study and did not enter NCT01405196 were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentages of Participants With Confirmed Positive Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs)Day 1 (n=56, 66, 36)0.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentages of Participants With Confirmed Positive Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs)Week 4 (n=58, 62, 29)0.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentages of Participants With Confirmed Positive Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs)Week 8 (n=53, 53, 27)0.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentages of Participants With Confirmed Positive Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs)Week 12 (n=46, 49, 24)0.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentages of Participants With Confirmed Positive Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs)Week 16 (n=2, 1, 0)0.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentages of Participants With Confirmed Positive Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs)Week 24 (n=2, 1, 0)0.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentages of Participants With Confirmed Positive Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs)Week 32 (n=1, 0, 0)0.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentages of Participants With Confirmed Positive Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs)Week 40 (n=2, 1, 0)0.0 percentage of participants
PF-04236921 10 mgPercentages of Participants With Confirmed Positive Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs)Week 8 (n=53, 53, 27)0.0 percentage of participants
PF-04236921 10 mgPercentages of Participants With Confirmed Positive Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs)Week 32 (n=1, 0, 0)NA percentage of participants
PF-04236921 10 mgPercentages of Participants With Confirmed Positive Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs)Week 12 (n=46, 49, 24)0.0 percentage of participants
PF-04236921 10 mgPercentages of Participants With Confirmed Positive Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs)Week 16 (n=2, 1, 0)0.0 percentage of participants
PF-04236921 10 mgPercentages of Participants With Confirmed Positive Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs)Week 24 (n=2, 1, 0)0.0 percentage of participants
PF-04236921 10 mgPercentages of Participants With Confirmed Positive Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs)Day 1 (n=56, 66, 36)0.0 percentage of participants
PF-04236921 10 mgPercentages of Participants With Confirmed Positive Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs)Week 4 (n=58, 62, 29)1.6 percentage of participants
PF-04236921 10 mgPercentages of Participants With Confirmed Positive Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs)Week 40 (n=2, 1, 0)0.0 percentage of participants
PF-04236921 50 mgPercentages of Participants With Confirmed Positive Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs)Week 8 (n=53, 53, 27)0.0 percentage of participants
PF-04236921 50 mgPercentages of Participants With Confirmed Positive Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs)Week 4 (n=58, 62, 29)0.0 percentage of participants
PF-04236921 50 mgPercentages of Participants With Confirmed Positive Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs)Day 1 (n=56, 66, 36)0.0 percentage of participants
PF-04236921 50 mgPercentages of Participants With Confirmed Positive Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs)Week 12 (n=46, 49, 24)0.0 percentage of participants
PF-04236921 50 mgPercentages of Participants With Confirmed Positive Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs)Week 32 (n=1, 0, 0)NA percentage of participants
PF-04236921 50 mgPercentages of Participants With Confirmed Positive Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs)Week 24 (n=2, 1, 0)NA percentage of participants
PF-04236921 50 mgPercentages of Participants With Confirmed Positive Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs)Week 16 (n=2, 1, 0)NA percentage of participants
PF-04236921 50 mgPercentages of Participants With Confirmed Positive Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs)Week 40 (n=2, 1, 0)NA percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentages of Participants With Confirmed Positive Neutralizing Antibodies (NAbs)

The percentage of participants with confirmed positive NAbs was summarized for each treatment arm. Only ADA positive samples were analyzed for Nab. A multi-tiered approach was utilized to detect NAbs. NAb serum samples were screened at tier one, and those found presumptively NAb positive was further tested with the confirmatory assay (tier two). The percentage of subjects with confirmed positive NAbs was summarized for each treatment.

Time frame: At baseline (Day 1) and at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 32 and 40

Population: The SAS consisted of all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. n signifies number of participants with observed data at the time point of each arm. From Weeks 16 to 40, only participants who remained in the follow-up period of this study and did not enter NCT01405196 were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentages of Participants With Confirmed Positive Neutralizing Antibodies (NAbs)Week 32 (n=1, 0, 0)0.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentages of Participants With Confirmed Positive Neutralizing Antibodies (NAbs)Week 8 (n=53, 53, 27)0.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentages of Participants With Confirmed Positive Neutralizing Antibodies (NAbs)Week 40 (n=2, 1, 0)0.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentages of Participants With Confirmed Positive Neutralizing Antibodies (NAbs)Week 16 (n=2, 1, 0)0.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentages of Participants With Confirmed Positive Neutralizing Antibodies (NAbs)Week 24 (n=2, 1, 0)0.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentages of Participants With Confirmed Positive Neutralizing Antibodies (NAbs)Day 1 (n=56, 66, 36)0.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentages of Participants With Confirmed Positive Neutralizing Antibodies (NAbs)Week 12 (n=46, 49, 24)0.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentages of Participants With Confirmed Positive Neutralizing Antibodies (NAbs)Week 4 (n=58, 62, 29)0.0 percentage of participants
PF-04236921 10 mgPercentages of Participants With Confirmed Positive Neutralizing Antibodies (NAbs)Week 24 (n=2, 1, 0)0.0 percentage of participants
PF-04236921 10 mgPercentages of Participants With Confirmed Positive Neutralizing Antibodies (NAbs)Week 4 (n=58, 62, 29)1.6 percentage of participants
PF-04236921 10 mgPercentages of Participants With Confirmed Positive Neutralizing Antibodies (NAbs)Week 8 (n=53, 53, 27)0.0 percentage of participants
PF-04236921 10 mgPercentages of Participants With Confirmed Positive Neutralizing Antibodies (NAbs)Week 12 (n=46, 49, 24)0.0 percentage of participants
PF-04236921 10 mgPercentages of Participants With Confirmed Positive Neutralizing Antibodies (NAbs)Week 16 (n=2, 1, 0)0.0 percentage of participants
PF-04236921 10 mgPercentages of Participants With Confirmed Positive Neutralizing Antibodies (NAbs)Week 32 (n=1, 0, 0)NA percentage of participants
PF-04236921 10 mgPercentages of Participants With Confirmed Positive Neutralizing Antibodies (NAbs)Week 40 (n=2, 1, 0)0.0 percentage of participants
PF-04236921 10 mgPercentages of Participants With Confirmed Positive Neutralizing Antibodies (NAbs)Day 1 (n=56, 66, 36)0.0 percentage of participants
PF-04236921 50 mgPercentages of Participants With Confirmed Positive Neutralizing Antibodies (NAbs)Week 40 (n=2, 1, 0)NA percentage of participants
PF-04236921 50 mgPercentages of Participants With Confirmed Positive Neutralizing Antibodies (NAbs)Week 16 (n=2, 1, 0)NA percentage of participants
PF-04236921 50 mgPercentages of Participants With Confirmed Positive Neutralizing Antibodies (NAbs)Week 24 (n=2, 1, 0)NA percentage of participants
PF-04236921 50 mgPercentages of Participants With Confirmed Positive Neutralizing Antibodies (NAbs)Week 32 (n=1, 0, 0)NA percentage of participants
PF-04236921 50 mgPercentages of Participants With Confirmed Positive Neutralizing Antibodies (NAbs)Week 4 (n=58, 62, 29)0.0 percentage of participants
PF-04236921 50 mgPercentages of Participants With Confirmed Positive Neutralizing Antibodies (NAbs)Day 1 (n=56, 66, 36)0.0 percentage of participants
PF-04236921 50 mgPercentages of Participants With Confirmed Positive Neutralizing Antibodies (NAbs)Week 8 (n=53, 53, 27)0.0 percentage of participants
PF-04236921 50 mgPercentages of Participants With Confirmed Positive Neutralizing Antibodies (NAbs)Week 12 (n=46, 49, 24)0.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Serum PF-04236921 Concentration Over Time

Time frame: Day 1 (predose), and at Weeks 2, 4 (Day 28, predose), 8, 10, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, and 40

Population: The pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis set was the subset of participants from the SAS who provided at least 1 PK concentration (2 participants \[10 mg arm\] excluded due to a quality issue). n is the number of participants with PK data at the visit. From Weeks 16 to 40, only participants who remained in the follow-up period of this study were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboSerum PF-04236921 Concentration Over TimeWeek 2 (n=46, 56, 30)1060 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 531.3
PlaceboSerum PF-04236921 Concentration Over TimeWeek 36 (n=2, 1, 0)NA nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
PlaceboSerum PF-04236921 Concentration Over TimeWeek 28 (n=2, 0, 0)NA nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
PlaceboSerum PF-04236921 Concentration Over TimeWeek 20 (n=2, 1, 0)102 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 143.5
PlaceboSerum PF-04236921 Concentration Over TimeWeek 10 (n=47, 54, 29)695 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 428.5
PlaceboSerum PF-04236921 Concentration Over TimeWeek 6 (n=48, 57, 28)1470 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 863
PlaceboSerum PF-04236921 Concentration Over TimeWeek 16 (n=2, 1, 0)177 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 250.3
PlaceboSerum PF-04236921 Concentration Over TimeWeek 8 (n=51, 52, 28)992 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 501.7
PlaceboSerum PF-04236921 Concentration Over TimeWeek 32 (n=2, 0, 0)NA nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
PlaceboSerum PF-04236921 Concentration Over TimeWeek 24 (n=2, 1, 0)63.5 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 89.8
PlaceboSerum PF-04236921 Concentration Over TimeWeek 4 (n=56, 63, 29)674 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 339.3
PlaceboSerum PF-04236921 Concentration Over TimeDay 1 (n=54, 64, 37)4.52 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 33.2
PlaceboSerum PF-04236921 Concentration Over TimeWeek 40 (n=2, 1, 0)NA nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
PlaceboSerum PF-04236921 Concentration Over TimeWeek 12 (n=43, 51, 26)504 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 435.5
PF-04236921 10 mgSerum PF-04236921 Concentration Over TimeWeek 28 (n=2, 0, 0)NA nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
PF-04236921 10 mgSerum PF-04236921 Concentration Over TimeWeek 12 (n=43, 51, 26)2110 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 1333
PF-04236921 10 mgSerum PF-04236921 Concentration Over TimeWeek 16 (n=2, 1, 0)1290 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
PF-04236921 10 mgSerum PF-04236921 Concentration Over TimeWeek 20 (n=2, 1, 0)425 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
PF-04236921 10 mgSerum PF-04236921 Concentration Over TimeDay 1 (n=54, 64, 37)2.05 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 16.38
PF-04236921 10 mgSerum PF-04236921 Concentration Over TimeWeek 2 (n=46, 56, 30)4580 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 1938
PF-04236921 10 mgSerum PF-04236921 Concentration Over TimeWeek 4 (n=56, 63, 29)3180 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 1555
PF-04236921 10 mgSerum PF-04236921 Concentration Over TimeWeek 6 (n=48, 57, 28)6610 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 2668
PF-04236921 10 mgSerum PF-04236921 Concentration Over TimeWeek 8 (n=51, 52, 28)4500 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 1993
PF-04236921 10 mgSerum PF-04236921 Concentration Over TimeWeek 10 (n=47, 54, 29)3280 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 1961
PF-04236921 10 mgSerum PF-04236921 Concentration Over TimeWeek 24 (n=2, 1, 0)NA nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
PF-04236921 10 mgSerum PF-04236921 Concentration Over TimeWeek 32 (n=2, 0, 0)NA nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
PF-04236921 10 mgSerum PF-04236921 Concentration Over TimeWeek 36 (n=2, 1, 0)109 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
PF-04236921 10 mgSerum PF-04236921 Concentration Over TimeWeek 40 (n=2, 1, 0)NA nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
PF-04236921 50 mgSerum PF-04236921 Concentration Over TimeWeek 36 (n=2, 1, 0)NA nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
PF-04236921 50 mgSerum PF-04236921 Concentration Over TimeWeek 24 (n=2, 1, 0)NA nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
PF-04236921 50 mgSerum PF-04236921 Concentration Over TimeWeek 2 (n=46, 56, 30)21300 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 9547
PF-04236921 50 mgSerum PF-04236921 Concentration Over TimeDay 1 (n=54, 64, 37)NA nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
PF-04236921 50 mgSerum PF-04236921 Concentration Over TimeWeek 28 (n=2, 0, 0)NA nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
PF-04236921 50 mgSerum PF-04236921 Concentration Over TimeWeek 20 (n=2, 1, 0)NA nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
PF-04236921 50 mgSerum PF-04236921 Concentration Over TimeWeek 12 (n=43, 51, 26)10900 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 7802
PF-04236921 50 mgSerum PF-04236921 Concentration Over TimeWeek 32 (n=2, 0, 0)NA nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
PF-04236921 50 mgSerum PF-04236921 Concentration Over TimeWeek 6 (n=48, 57, 28)32200 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 13240
PF-04236921 50 mgSerum PF-04236921 Concentration Over TimeWeek 16 (n=2, 1, 0)NA nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
PF-04236921 50 mgSerum PF-04236921 Concentration Over TimeWeek 8 (n=51, 52, 28)20200 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 8683
PF-04236921 50 mgSerum PF-04236921 Concentration Over TimeWeek 4 (n=56, 63, 29)14800 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 6641
PF-04236921 50 mgSerum PF-04236921 Concentration Over TimeWeek 40 (n=2, 1, 0)NA nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
PF-04236921 50 mgSerum PF-04236921 Concentration Over TimeWeek 10 (n=47, 54, 29)13600 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 7350
Secondary

The CDAI-100 Response Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo and PF-04236921 200 mg

CDAI-100 response was defined as a decrease in CDAI score of 100 or greater from baseline. The proportions of participants with CDAI-100 response at Week 12 were compared between placebo and PF-04236921 200 mg. CDAI is used to quantify the symptoms of patients with Crohn's Disease. CDAI evaluates 8 Crohn's disease-related variables during a 1-week assessment period, yielding a composite score \>=0 and without an upper limit. Many clinical trials use the endpoint for response as a 70 or greater point decrease in CDAI and clinical remission is often defined as a CDAI score below 150. The Outcome included a Generalized linear mixed model analyses which incorporated longitudinal data for each subject, and the same model is used for estimate (least squares mean) and statistical analysis (mean difference). Since the inputs in the model included different Analysis Population than in Outcome Measure 9, that will yield different estimates for placebo for the two different models.

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12

Population: The analysis was performed on the FAS 200 mg vs placebo. The 200 mg arm was halted before reaching the planned sample size of approximately 60 participants. n signifies the number of subjects with observed data of each arm at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
PlaceboThe CDAI-100 Response Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo and PF-04236921 200 mgWeek 6 (n=58, 32)12.2 Percentage of participants
PlaceboThe CDAI-100 Response Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo and PF-04236921 200 mgWeek 8 (n=58, 29)21.3 Percentage of participants
PlaceboThe CDAI-100 Response Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo and PF-04236921 200 mgWeek 12 (n=57, 29)19.4 Percentage of participants
PlaceboThe CDAI-100 Response Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo and PF-04236921 200 mgWeek 10 (n=54, 29)18.2 Percentage of participants
PlaceboThe CDAI-100 Response Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo and PF-04236921 200 mgWeek 4 (n=66, 35)11.0 Percentage of participants
PlaceboThe CDAI-100 Response Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo and PF-04236921 200 mgWeek 2 (n=64, 36)10.3 Percentage of participants
PF-04236921 10 mgThe CDAI-100 Response Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo and PF-04236921 200 mgWeek 12 (n=57, 29)26.9 Percentage of participants
PF-04236921 10 mgThe CDAI-100 Response Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo and PF-04236921 200 mgWeek 2 (n=64, 36)12.0 Percentage of participants
PF-04236921 10 mgThe CDAI-100 Response Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo and PF-04236921 200 mgWeek 4 (n=66, 35)22.1 Percentage of participants
PF-04236921 10 mgThe CDAI-100 Response Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo and PF-04236921 200 mgWeek 8 (n=58, 29)18.7 Percentage of participants
PF-04236921 10 mgThe CDAI-100 Response Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo and PF-04236921 200 mgWeek 10 (n=54, 29)30.4 Percentage of participants
PF-04236921 10 mgThe CDAI-100 Response Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo and PF-04236921 200 mgWeek 6 (n=58, 32)22.2 Percentage of participants
Comparison: LSM difference from placebo in CDAI-100 response rate for the 200-mg arm at Week 2.p-value: 0.403190% CI: [-9.5, 12.9]GLMM
Comparison: LSM difference from placebo in CDAI-100 response rate for the 200-mg arm at Week 4.p-value: 0.121990% CI: [-4.6, 26.8]GLMM
Comparison: LSM difference from placebo in CDAI-100 response rate for the 200-mg arm at Week 6.p-value: 0.1690% CI: [-6.5, 26.4]GLMM
Comparison: LSM difference from placebo in CDAI-100 response rate for the 200-mg arm at Week 8.p-value: 0.601990% CI: [-19.5, 14.2]GLMM
Comparison: LSM difference from placebo in CDAI-100 response rate for the 200-mg arm at Week 10.p-value: 0.160190% CI: [-8, 32.5]GLMM
Comparison: LSM difference from placebo in CDAI-100 response rate for the 200-mg arm at Week 12.p-value: 0.262290% CI: [-11.8, 26.6]GLMM
Secondary

The CDAI-100 Response Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mg

CDAI-100 response was defined as a decrease in CDAI score of 100 or greater from baseline. The proportions of participants with CDAI-100 response at Week 12 were compared between placebo and PF-04236921 10 mg/50 mg. CDAI is used to quantify the symptoms of patients with Crohn's Disease. CDAI evaluates 8 Crohn's disease-related variables during a 1-week assessment period, yielding a composite score \>=0 and without an upper limit. Many clinical trials use the endpoint for response as a 70 or greater point decrease in CDAI and clinical remission is often defined as a CDAI score below 150. The Outcome included a Generalized linear mixed model analyses which incorporated longitudinal data for each subject, and the same model is used for estimate (least squares mean) and statistical analysis (mean difference).

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12

Population: The analysis was performed on the FAS excluding 200 mg arm (which was halted prematurely). n signifies the number of subjects with observed data of each arm at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
PlaceboThe CDAI-100 Response Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mgWeek 4 (n=66, 58, 59)13.0 Percentage of participants
PlaceboThe CDAI-100 Response Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mgWeek 10 (n=54, 50, 51)21.0 Percentage of participants
PlaceboThe CDAI-100 Response Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mgWeek 6 (n=58, 53, 60)14.5 Percentage of participants
PlaceboThe CDAI-100 Response Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mgWeek 2 (n=64, 63, 65)12.4 Percentage of participants
PlaceboThe CDAI-100 Response Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mgWeek 12 (n=57, 52, 54)22.2 Percentage of participants
PlaceboThe CDAI-100 Response Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mgWeek 8 (n=58, 53, 56)24.1 Percentage of participants
PF-04236921 10 mgThe CDAI-100 Response Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mgWeek 12 (n=57, 52, 54)32.7 Percentage of participants
PF-04236921 10 mgThe CDAI-100 Response Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mgWeek 2 (n=64, 63, 65)16.7 Percentage of participants
PF-04236921 10 mgThe CDAI-100 Response Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mgWeek 4 (n=66, 58, 59)18.1 Percentage of participants
PF-04236921 10 mgThe CDAI-100 Response Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mgWeek 6 (n=58, 53, 60)28.7 Percentage of participants
PF-04236921 10 mgThe CDAI-100 Response Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mgWeek 8 (n=58, 53, 56)26.5 Percentage of participants
PF-04236921 10 mgThe CDAI-100 Response Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mgWeek 10 (n=54, 50, 51)29.8 Percentage of participants
PF-04236921 50 mgThe CDAI-100 Response Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mgWeek 2 (n=64, 63, 65)12.6 Percentage of participants
PF-04236921 50 mgThe CDAI-100 Response Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mgWeek 10 (n=54, 50, 51)38.2 Percentage of participants
PF-04236921 50 mgThe CDAI-100 Response Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mgWeek 8 (n=58, 53, 56)37.9 Percentage of participants
PF-04236921 50 mgThe CDAI-100 Response Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mgWeek 4 (n=66, 58, 59)26.3 Percentage of participants
PF-04236921 50 mgThe CDAI-100 Response Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mgWeek 12 (n=57, 52, 54)36.2 Percentage of participants
PF-04236921 50 mgThe CDAI-100 Response Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mgWeek 6 (n=58, 53, 60)32.2 Percentage of participants
Comparison: LSM difference from placebo in CDAI-100 response rate for the 10-mg arm at Week 2.p-value: 0.268790% CI: [-7.2, 15.8]GLMM
Comparison: LSM difference from placebo in CDAI-100 response rate for the 10-mg arm at Week 4.p-value: 0.24690% CI: [-7.1, 17.3]GLMM
Comparison: LSM difference from placebo in CDAI-100 response rate for the 10-mg arm at Week 6.p-value: 0.063390% CI: [-1.1, 29.5]GLMM
Comparison: LSM difference from placebo in CDAI-100 response rate for the 10-mg arm at Week 8.p-value: 0.403690% CI: [-13.8, 18.6]GLMM
Comparison: LSM difference from placebo in CDAI-100 response rate for the 10-mg arm at Week 10.p-value: 0.192190% CI: [-7.9, 25.6]GLMM
Comparison: LSM difference from placebo in CDAI-100 response rate for the 10-mg arm at Week 12.p-value: 0.154190% CI: [-6.5, 27.5]GLMM
Comparison: LSM difference from placebo in CDAI-100 response rate for the 50-mg arm at Week 2.p-value: 0.489390% CI: [-10.5, 10.9]GLMM
Comparison: LSM difference from placebo in CDAI-100 response rate for the 50-mg arm at Week 4.p-value: 0.061990% CI: [-0.9, 27.4]GLMM
Comparison: LSM difference from placebo in CDAI-100 response rate for the 50-mg arm at Week 6.p-value: 0.02990% CI: [2.3, 33.1]GLMM
Comparison: LSM difference from placebo in CDAI-100 response rate for the 50-mg arm at Week 8.p-value: 0.098890% CI: [-3.8, 31.4]GLMM
Comparison: LSM difference from placebo in CDAI-100 response rate for the 50-mg arm at Week 10.p-value: 0.054990% CI: [-0.5, 35]GLMM
Comparison: LSM difference from placebo in CDAI-100 response rate for the 50-mg arm at Week 12.p-value: 0.09290% CI: [-3.3, 31.3]GLMM
Secondary

The CDAI-70 Response Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo and PF-04236921 200 mg

CDAI-70 response was defined as a decrease in CDAI score of 70 or greater from baseline. The proportions of participants with CDAI-70 response were compared between placebo and PF-04236921 200 mg. CDAI is used to quantify the symptoms of patients with Crohn's Disease. CDAI evaluates 8 Crohn's disease-related variables during a 1-week assessment period, yielding a composite score \>=0 and without an upper limit. Many clinical trials use the endpoint for response as a 70 or greater point decrease in CDAI and clinical remission is often defined as a CDAI score below 150. The Outcome included a Generalized linear mixed model analyses which incorporated longitudinal data for each subject, and the same model is used for estimate (least squares mean) and statistical analysis (mean difference). Since the inputs in the model included different Analysis Population than in Outcome Measure 5, that will yield different estimates for placebo for the two different models.

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 6, and 10

Population: The analysis was performed on the FAS 200 mg vs placebo. The 200 mg arm was halted before reaching the planned sample size of approximately 60 participants. n signifies the number of subjects with observed data of each arm at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
PlaceboThe CDAI-70 Response Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo and PF-04236921 200 mgWeek 2 (n=64, 36)11.2 Percentage of participants
PlaceboThe CDAI-70 Response Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo and PF-04236921 200 mgWeek 4 (n=66, 35)15.2 Percentage of participants
PlaceboThe CDAI-70 Response Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo and PF-04236921 200 mgWeek 6 (n=58, 32)19.5 Percentage of participants
PlaceboThe CDAI-70 Response Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo and PF-04236921 200 mgWeek 10 (n=54, 29)27.2 Percentage of participants
PF-04236921 10 mgThe CDAI-70 Response Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo and PF-04236921 200 mgWeek 10 (n=54, 29)46.3 Percentage of participants
PF-04236921 10 mgThe CDAI-70 Response Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo and PF-04236921 200 mgWeek 2 (n=64, 36)26.5 Percentage of participants
PF-04236921 10 mgThe CDAI-70 Response Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo and PF-04236921 200 mgWeek 6 (n=58, 32)27.2 Percentage of participants
PF-04236921 10 mgThe CDAI-70 Response Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo and PF-04236921 200 mgWeek 4 (n=66, 35)24.6 Percentage of participants
Comparison: LSM difference from placebo in CDAI-70 response rate for the 200-mg arm at Week 2.p-value: 0.066290% CI: [-1.4, 32.1]GLMM
Comparison: LSM difference from placebo in CDAI-70 response rate for the 200-mg arm at Week 4.p-value: 0.170890% CI: [-6.9, 25.8]GLMM
Comparison: LSM difference from placebo in CDAI-70 response rate for the 200-mg arm at Week 6.p-value: 0.241690% CI: [-10.5, 26]GLMM
Comparison: LSM difference from placebo in CDAI-70 response rate for the 200-mg arm at Week 10.p-value: 0.08890% CI: [-4.1, 42.3]GLMM
Secondary

The CDAI-70 Response Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mg

CDAI-70 response was defined as a decrease in CDAI score of 70 or greater from baseline. The proportions of participants with CDAI-70 response were compared between placebo and PF-04236921 10 mg/50 mg. CDAI is used to quantify the symptoms of patients with Crohn's Disease. CDAI evaluates 8 Crohn's disease-related variables during a 1-week assessment period, yielding a composite score \>=0 and without an upper limit. Many clinical trials use the endpoint for response as a 70 or greater point decrease in CDAI and clinical remission is often defined as a CDAI score below 150. The Outcome included a Generalized linear mixed model analyses which incorporated longitudinal data for each subject, and the same model is used for estimate (least squares mean) and statistical analysis (mean difference).

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 6, and 10

Population: The analysis was performed on the FAS excluding 200 mg arm (which was halted prematurely). n signifies the number of subjects with observed data of each arm at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
PlaceboThe CDAI-70 Response Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mgWeek 6 (n=58, 53, 60)21.1 Percentage of participants
PlaceboThe CDAI-70 Response Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mgWeek 2 (n=64, 63, 65)12.3 Percentage of participants
PlaceboThe CDAI-70 Response Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mgWeek 10 (n=54, 50, 51)29.3 Percentage of participants
PlaceboThe CDAI-70 Response Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mgWeek 4 (n=66, 58, 59)16.5 Percentage of participants
PF-04236921 10 mgThe CDAI-70 Response Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mgWeek 6 (n=58, 53, 60)35.0 Percentage of participants
PF-04236921 10 mgThe CDAI-70 Response Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mgWeek 4 (n=66, 58, 59)34.6 Percentage of participants
PF-04236921 10 mgThe CDAI-70 Response Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mgWeek 2 (n=64, 63, 65)19.4 Percentage of participants
PF-04236921 10 mgThe CDAI-70 Response Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mgWeek 10 (n=54, 50, 51)38.9 Percentage of participants
PF-04236921 50 mgThe CDAI-70 Response Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mgWeek 10 (n=54, 50, 51)54.0 Percentage of participants
PF-04236921 50 mgThe CDAI-70 Response Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mgWeek 2 (n=64, 63, 65)18.1 Percentage of participants
PF-04236921 50 mgThe CDAI-70 Response Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mgWeek 4 (n=66, 58, 59)37.0 Percentage of participants
PF-04236921 50 mgThe CDAI-70 Response Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mgWeek 6 (n=58, 53, 60)46.2 Percentage of participants
Comparison: LSM difference from placebo in CDAI-70 response rate for the 10-mg arm at Week 2.p-value: 0.152790% CI: [-4.3, 18.6]GLMM
Comparison: LSM difference from placebo in CDAI-70 response rate for the 10-mg arm at Week 4.p-value: 0.023590% CI: [3.1, 33.2]GLMM
Comparison: LSM difference from placebo in CDAI-70 response rate for the 10-mg arm at Week 6.p-value: 0.079290% CI: [-2.3, 30.2]GLMM
Comparison: LSM difference from placebo in CDAI-70 response rate for the 10-mg arm at Week 10.p-value: 0.190990% CI: [-8.4, 27.6]GLMM
Comparison: LSM difference from placebo in CDAI-70 response rate for the 50-mg arm at Week 2.p-value: 0.198190% CI: [-5.4, 17]GLMM
Comparison: LSM difference from placebo in CDAI-70 response rate for the 50-mg arm at Week 4.p-value: 0.013290% CI: [5.3, 35.8]GLMM
Comparison: LSM difference from placebo in CDAI-70 response rate for the 50-mg arm at Week 6.p-value: 0.006390% CI: [8.6, 41.7]GLMM
Comparison: LSM difference from placebo in CDAI-70 response rate for the 50-mg arm at Week 10.p-value: 0.013890% CI: [6.2, 43.1]GLMM
Secondary

The CDAI Remission Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo and PF-04236921 200 mg

CDAI remission rate was defined as an absolute CDAI score \<150. The proportions of participants with CDAI remission were compared between placebo and PF-04236921 200 mg. CDAI is used to quantify the symptoms of patients with Crohn's Disease. CDAI evaluates 8 Crohn's disease-related variables during a 1-week assessment period, yielding a composite score \>=0 and without an upper limit. Many clinical trials use the endpoint for response as a 70 or greater point decrease in CDAI and clinical remission is often defined as a CDAI score below 150. The Outcome included a Generalized linear mixed model analyses which incorporated longitudinal data for each subject, and the same model is used for estimate (least squares mean) and statistical analysis (mean difference). Since the inputs in the model included different Analysis Population than in Outcome Measure 7, that will yield different estimates for placebo for the two different models.

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12

Population: The analysis was performed on the FAS 200 mg vs placebo. The 200 mg arm was halted before reaching the planned sample size of approximately 60 participants. n signifies the number of subjects with observed data of each arm at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
PlaceboThe CDAI Remission Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo and PF-04236921 200 mgWeek 2 (n=64, 36)1.1 Percentage of participants
PlaceboThe CDAI Remission Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo and PF-04236921 200 mgWeek 12 (n=57, 29)7.8 Percentage of participants
PlaceboThe CDAI Remission Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo and PF-04236921 200 mgWeek 4 (n=66, 35)2.4 Percentage of participants
PlaceboThe CDAI Remission Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo and PF-04236921 200 mgWeek 10 (n=54, 29)9.4 Percentage of participants
PlaceboThe CDAI Remission Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo and PF-04236921 200 mgWeek 8 (n=58, 29)11.9 Percentage of participants
PlaceboThe CDAI Remission Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo and PF-04236921 200 mgWeek 6 (n=58, 32)6.1 Percentage of participants
PF-04236921 10 mgThe CDAI Remission Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo and PF-04236921 200 mgWeek 12 (n=57, 29)11.8 Percentage of participants
PF-04236921 10 mgThe CDAI Remission Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo and PF-04236921 200 mgWeek 2 (n=64, 36)6.9 Percentage of participants
PF-04236921 10 mgThe CDAI Remission Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo and PF-04236921 200 mgWeek 4 (n=66, 35)5.1 Percentage of participants
PF-04236921 10 mgThe CDAI Remission Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo and PF-04236921 200 mgWeek 6 (n=58, 32)8.8 Percentage of participants
PF-04236921 10 mgThe CDAI Remission Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo and PF-04236921 200 mgWeek 8 (n=58, 29)8.8 Percentage of participants
PF-04236921 10 mgThe CDAI Remission Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo and PF-04236921 200 mgWeek 10 (n=54, 29)14.8 Percentage of participants
Comparison: LSM difference from placebo in CDAI remission rate for the 200-mg arm at Week 2.p-value: 0.134290% CI: [-2.8, 14.5]GLMM
Comparison: LSM difference from placebo in CDAI remission rate for the 200-mg arm at Week 4.p-value: 0.262390% CI: [-4.3, 9.8]GLMM
Comparison: LSM difference from placebo in CDAI remission rate for the 200-mg arm at Week 6.p-value: 0.332490% CI: [-7.7, 13.2]GLMM
Comparison: LSM difference from placebo in CDAI remission rate for the 200-mg arm at Week 8.p-value: 0.663790% CI: [-15.5, 9.1]GLMM
Comparison: LSM difference from placebo in CDAI remission rate for the 200-mg arm at Week 10.p-value: 0.272190% CI: [-9.3, 20.2]GLMM
Comparison: LSM difference from placebo in CDAI remission rate for the 200-mg arm at Week 12.p-value: 0.302290% CI: [-8.8, 16.9]GLMM
Secondary

The CDAI Remission Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mg

CDAI remission rate was defined as an absolute CDAI score less than (\<) 150. The proportions of participants with CDAI remission were compared between placebo and PF-04236921 10 mg/50 mg. CDAI is used to quantify the symptoms of patients with Crohn's Disease. CDAI evaluates 8 Crohn's disease-related variables during a 1-week assessment period, yielding a composite score \>=0 and without an upper limit. Many clinical trials use the endpoint for response as a 70 or greater point decrease in CDAI and clinical remission is often defined as a CDAI score below 150. The Outcome included a Generalized linear mixed model analyses which incorporated longitudinal data for each subject, and the same model is used for estimate (least squares mean) and statistical analysis (mean difference).

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12

Population: The analysis was performed on the FAS excluding 200 mg arm (which was halted prematurely). n signifies the number of subjects with observed data of each arm at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
PlaceboThe CDAI Remission Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mgWeek 2 (n=64, 63, 68)1.6 Percentage of participants
PlaceboThe CDAI Remission Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mgWeek 4 (n=66, 58, 62)3.4 Percentage of participants
PlaceboThe CDAI Remission Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mgWeek 6 (n=58, 53, 63)8.5 Percentage of participants
PlaceboThe CDAI Remission Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mgWeek 8 (n=58, 53, 58)16.3 Percentage of participants
PlaceboThe CDAI Remission Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mgWeek 10 (n=54, 50, 54)13.1 Percentage of participants
PlaceboThe CDAI Remission Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mgWeek 12 (n=57, 52, 57)10.9 Percentage of participants
PF-04236921 10 mgThe CDAI Remission Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mgWeek 4 (n=66, 58, 62)4.1 Percentage of participants
PF-04236921 10 mgThe CDAI Remission Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mgWeek 8 (n=58, 53, 58)10.8 Percentage of participants
PF-04236921 10 mgThe CDAI Remission Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mgWeek 12 (n=57, 52, 57)10.8 Percentage of participants
PF-04236921 10 mgThe CDAI Remission Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mgWeek 6 (n=58, 53, 63)7.3 Percentage of participants
PF-04236921 10 mgThe CDAI Remission Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mgWeek 2 (n=64, 63, 68)3.6 Percentage of participants
PF-04236921 10 mgThe CDAI Remission Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mgWeek 10 (n=54, 50, 54)19.9 Percentage of participants
PF-04236921 50 mgThe CDAI Remission Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mgWeek 4 (n=66, 58, 62)19.7 Percentage of participants
PF-04236921 50 mgThe CDAI Remission Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mgWeek 10 (n=54, 50, 54)30.9 Percentage of participants
PF-04236921 50 mgThe CDAI Remission Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mgWeek 6 (n=58, 53, 63)23.4 Percentage of participants
PF-04236921 50 mgThe CDAI Remission Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mgWeek 12 (n=57, 52, 57)27.4 Percentage of participants
PF-04236921 50 mgThe CDAI Remission Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mgWeek 2 (n=64, 63, 68)9.6 Percentage of participants
PF-04236921 50 mgThe CDAI Remission Rate Over Time in Participants Who Received Placebo, PF-04236921 10 mg and PF-04236921 50 mgWeek 8 (n=58, 53, 58)24.9 Percentage of participants
Comparison: LSM difference from placebo in CDAI remission rate for the 50-mg arm at Week 10.p-value: 0.041590% CI: [0.9, 34.7]GLMM
Comparison: LSM difference from placebo in CDAI remission rate for the 10-mg arm at Week 10.p-value: 0.230890% CI: [-8.3, 21.9]GLMM
Comparison: LSM difference from placebo in CDAI remission rate for the 10-mg arm at Week 12.p-value: 0.503890% CI: [-11.8, 11.7]GLMM
Comparison: LSM difference from placebo in CDAI remission rate for the 50-mg arm at Week 2.p-value: 0.049890% CI: [0, 16]GLMM
Comparison: LSM difference from placebo in CDAI remission rate for the 50-mg arm at Week 4.p-value: 0.015590% CI: [3.9, 28.7]GLMM
Comparison: LSM difference from placebo in CDAI remission rate for the 50-mg arm at Week 6.p-value: 0.039990% CI: [0.9, 28.9]GLMM
Comparison: LSM difference from placebo in CDAI remission rate for the 50-mg arm at Week 8.p-value: 0.186690% CI: [-7.2, 24.3]GLMM
Comparison: LSM difference from placebo in CDAI remission rate for the 10-mg arm at Week 2.p-value: 0.26190% CI: [-3.2, 7.2]GLMM
Comparison: LSM difference from placebo in CDAI remission rate for the 10-mg arm at Week 4.p-value: 0.429190% CI: [-5.6, 7]GLMM
Comparison: LSM difference from placebo in CDAI remission rate for the 10-mg arm at Week 6.p-value: 0.579190% CI: [-11, 8.6]GLMM
Comparison: LSM difference from placebo in CDAI remission rate for the 10-mg arm at Week 8.p-value: 0.754490% CI: [-18.8, 7.7]GLMM
Comparison: LSM difference from placebo in CDAI remission rate for the 50-mg arm at Week 12.p-value: 0.040890% CI: [0.9, 32.1]GLMM

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 25, 2026