Skip to content

The Impact of Early Embryos Incubation on Pregnancy Rate in IVF

The Impact of Early Embryos Incubation on Pregnancy Rate in IVF

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01287273
Acronym
IVF-2010
Enrollment
660
Registered
2011-02-01
Start date
2011-04-30
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2013-12-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

In Vitro Fertilization, Pregnancy

Keywords

frozen-thawed, IVF, incubation, pregnancy rate, Pregnancy rate of frozen-thawed embryos of IVF treatments

Brief summary

Frozen- thawed embryos obtained by IVF treatments are transferred to the uterus immediately following thawing or after incubation for additional 24-72 hours. The two methods are routine in IVF laboratories. In this study the investigators would like to compare between these two methods in terms of implantation rate, pregnancy rate and delivery.

Detailed description

It has been common practice to cryopreserve surplus embryos achieved during IVF treatment or in other situation that embryos are to be preserved for other situations such as suspected ovarian hyper stimulation syndrome, fertility preservation or patient request. Embryos are usually frozen on day 2, 3 or day 5-6 at the Blastocyst stage. At the time that thawing is planned, patients' cycle is synchronized and prepared either with hormonal treatment or at the natural cycle. Not all embryos will always survive the thawing and sometimes they will all degenerate. Embryos that survive the thawing procedure are assessed and replaced on the day of the thaw or left overnight for better selection and will be replaced only if they continue to divide in vitro. The advantage of embryo transfer on the day of thaw is that embryo exposure in culture is shortened and embryo selection will be occurring in the womb. On the other hand, overnight incubation may avoid transferring embryos that potentially are not able to divide and are biologically not viable. Although both attitudes are practiced in different IVF centers, at present there are no prospective randomized studies that have been conducted to advise which intervention is better in terms of pregnancy rates. The purpose of the present study is to assess which technique will result in better pregnancy rates.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Martha Dirnfeld
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 45 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* IVF patient who have thawed embryo transfer and can read understand and sigh on informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* IVF patient who have thawed embryo transfer and can not read understand and sigh on informed consent/ also those whos embryos will not survive freezing- thawing

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pregnancy as measured by blood test for beta hCG12 days following embryos transferas the usual routine, the women come on day 12 or 13 following embryo transfer to pur IVF unit to get blood teat for beta hCG. When the result show that the beta hCG is above 5 unit/liter we consider it as positive result and the patients is invited for additional blood test 2 days later/

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Delivery of baby9 mounth after embryos transferWe are routinely report to the Israeli ministry of health all the children who were born from our treatment. In this study we will calculate the number of children per thawed embryo transfer.

Countries

Israel

Contacts

Primary ContactMartha Dirnfeld, MD
dirnfeld_martha@clalit.org.il8250335
Backup ContactShirly Lahav-Baratz, D.Sc
lahav_shirly@clalit.org.il8250118

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026