Skip to content

Continuous Soluble Ferric Pyrophosphate (SFP) Iron Delivery Via Dialysate in Hemodialysis Patients

Physiological Iron Maintenance in End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) Subjects by Delivery of Soluble Ferric Pyrophosphate (SFP) Via Hemodialysate: The PRIME Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01286012
Acronym
PRIME
Enrollment
108
Registered
2011-01-31
Start date
2011-01-31
Completion date
2013-01-31
Last updated
2018-10-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

End Stage Renal Disease

Keywords

End Stage Renal Disease, Hemodialysis, SFP

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical safety and efficacy of SFP in sparing the need for erythropoiesis stimulating agents (ESAs) required to maintain hemoglobin (hgb) levels in chronic hemodialysis subjects who receive SFP via the dialysate versus subjects who receive conventional dialysate without iron.

Interventions

DRUGSoluble Ferric Pyrophosphate in liquid bicarbonate

Subjects will receive hemodialysis containing SFP at 2 µM (11 µg iron/dL of dialysate) at every dialysis session, for a total duration of 36 weeks.

DRUGPlacebo: Conventional liquid bicarbonate

Subjects will receive hemodialysis containing conventional liquid bicarbonate lacking SFP at every dialysis session, for a total duration of 36 weeks.

DRUGErythrocyte Stimulating Agent (ESA)

ESA was administered according to the recommendation of a blinded central anemia management center (CAMC) based on the weekly hemoglobin value and its rate of change.

DRUGIntravenous (IV) Iron

Approved IV iron preparations were administered per a protocol driven algorithm when patients serum ferritin value decreased below 200 ug/L.

Sponsors

Rockwell Medical Technologies, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Main Inclusion Criteria: 1. Male and female subjects ≥ 18 years of age. 2. End-stage renal disease undergoing maintenance hemodialysis 3 to 4 times a week for at least 4 months and expected to remain on this schedule and be able to complete the study. Subjects on a cadaveric transplant list need not be excluded for this reason unless there is an identified donor. 3. Mean Hgb in the range of ≥ 9.5 to ≤ 12.0 g/dL during screening. 4. The difference between the maximum and minimum Hgb values during screening does not exceed 1.0 g/dL. 5. Mean ferritin ≥ 200 to ≤ 1000 µg/L during screening. 6. Mean TSAT ≥ 15% to ≤ 40% during screening. 7. Any and all serum albumin measured during the 2 months preceding randomization must be ≥ 3.0 g/dL. 8. Prescribed ESA dosing remaining in the range of ≥ 4,000 to ≤ 45,000 U/week epoetin or ≥ 12.5 to ≤ 200 µg/week darbepoetin during the 6 weeks preceding randomization. 9. Required IV iron at any time in the 6 months preceding randomization. Main

Exclusion criteria

1. Vascular access for dialysis is a catheter. 2. During the 6 months prior to randomization, infection of the vascular access to be used at the time of randomization. 3. Received a total of \> 600 mg IV iron during the 6 weeks prior to randomization. 4. Received any amount of IV or oral iron during the 2 weeks prior to randomization. 5. Change in prescribed ESA dose: 1. Any change in prescribed ESA dose within 4 weeks prior to randomization. 2. The prescribed ESA dose at the time of randomization is \> 25% higher or lower than the prescribed dose at 6 weeks prior to randomization. 3. Change in prescribed type of ESA (e.g., epoetin vs. darbepoetin) or route of administration within 6 weeks prior to randomization. 6. Actual ESA dosing missed or withheld for a cumulative total of ≥ 1 week for any reason during the 6 weeks prior to randomization. 7. Known cause of anemia other than anemia attributable to renal disease (e.g., sickle cell disease, thalassemia, pure red cell aplasia, hemolytic anemia, myelodysplastic syndrome, etc.) 8. Scheduled kidney transplant or a donor has been identified but the transplant has not been scheduled. 9. Known ongoing inflammatory disorder (other than Chronic Kidney Disease), such as systemic lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis, other collagen-vascular diseases, etc. 11\. Known active tuberculosis, fungal, viral, or parasitic infection requiring anti-microbial therapy or anticipated to require anti-microbial therapy during the patient's participation in this study. Subjects with hepatitis C, in the absence of cirrhosis, are not excluded from participation in the study if Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels are below 2 times the upper limit of normal on a consistent basis during the 2 months preceding randomization. 12\. Occult tuberculosis requiring prophylactic treatment with anti-tubercular drug(s) that overlaps with the patient's participation in this study. 13\. Cirrhosis of the liver based on histological criteria or clinical criteria (e.g., presence of ascites, esophageal varices, spider nevi, or history of hepatic encephalopathy).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The Percent Change From Baseline in ESA Dose Required to Maintain Hemoglobin in the Target Range, Adjusted for Hgb.Hemoglobin measured weekly and serum ferritin and Transferrin Saturation (TSAT) determined every other week; ESA dose recorded at each visit for 36 weeks.The statistical endpoint is the change from baseline between groups at End of Treatment, where the baseline prescribed ESA dose (expressed as U/week epoetin) per subject is defined as the average weekly dose of ESA prescribed for administration over the two-week period of time immediately prior to randomization. The end-of-treatment prescribed ESA dose (expressed as U/week epoetin) per subject is defined as the average weekly dose of ESA prescribed for administration over the last two weeks of the treatment period.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The Distribution of Changes From Baseline in the Prescribed ESA Dose Between the Two Treatment ArmsESA dose is monitored and recorded at each dialysis session for 36 weeks.The change from baseline in prescribed ESA dose at end-of-treatment was categorized as being greater than or equal to 25%, 10 to less than 25%, -10 to 10%, greater than -25 to -10% and less than or equal to -25%. The number of subjects in each treatment group that fit each category was compared.
Stability of Hemoglobin Over Time (Maintenance of Hemoglobin Between 9.5-11.5 g/dL.36 weeksThe number of patients in each treatment group who had maintained their hemoglobin between 95 and 115 grams/liter at the end of treatment was quantified.
The Amount of Supplemental Intravenous (IV) Iron Needed During Study Participation.36 weeksThe absolute amount of IV iron administered to subjects in each treatment group was divided by the number of weeks on study and the number of subjects per treatment group such that the mean dose of IV iron (mg) per week per subject (for the entire treatment group) was calculated.
Comparison of Iron Delivery to the Erythron From Baseline to End of Treatment Between the Treatment Groups.36 weeksIron delivery to the erythron was estimated by Hgb generation in response to erythropoietin (ERI, calculated as ESA dose/Hgb). In addition, ERI was also divided by body weight in kilograms to obtain a modified ERI (ERI/kg).

Countries

Puerto Rico, United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
SFP in Liquid Bicarbonate
Soluble Ferric Pyrophosphate in liquid bicarbonate: Subjects will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive hemodialysis containing SFP at 2 µM (11 µg iron/dL of dialysate) or conventional solutions lacking iron (placebo) at every dialysis session, for a total duration of 36 weeks.
54
Placebo: Conventional Liquid Bicarbonate
Control concentrate lacking SFP does not contain SFP (total iron = 0) Subjects will receive hemodialysis containing conventional liquid bicarbonate lacking iron (placebo) at every dialysis session, for a total duration of 36 weeks.
49
Total103

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event33
Overall StudyDeath23
Overall Studyperitoneal dialysis, randomized in error13
Overall StudyPhysician Decision20
Overall StudyProtocol Violation11
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject44

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSFP in Liquid BicarbonatePlacebo: Conventional Liquid BicarbonateTotal
Age, Continuous59.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.4
58.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.89
59 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.07
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
20 Participants21 Participants41 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
34 Participants28 Participants62 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
22 Participants17 Participants39 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
31 Participants32 Participants63 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
23 Participants17 Participants40 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
31 Participants32 Participants63 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
50 / 5446 / 49
serious
Total, serious adverse events
18 / 5420 / 49

Outcome results

Primary

The Percent Change From Baseline in ESA Dose Required to Maintain Hemoglobin in the Target Range, Adjusted for Hgb.

The statistical endpoint is the change from baseline between groups at End of Treatment, where the baseline prescribed ESA dose (expressed as U/week epoetin) per subject is defined as the average weekly dose of ESA prescribed for administration over the two-week period of time immediately prior to randomization. The end-of-treatment prescribed ESA dose (expressed as U/week epoetin) per subject is defined as the average weekly dose of ESA prescribed for administration over the last two weeks of the treatment period.

Time frame: Hemoglobin measured weekly and serum ferritin and Transferrin Saturation (TSAT) determined every other week; ESA dose recorded at each visit for 36 weeks.

Population: MITT population: Randomized subjects who received at least one dose of study drug and also received ESA during the treatment period.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
SFP in Liquid BicarbonateThe Percent Change From Baseline in ESA Dose Required to Maintain Hemoglobin in the Target Range, Adjusted for Hgb.4.9 Percent changeStandard Error 12.07
Placebo: Conventional Liquid BicarbonateThe Percent Change From Baseline in ESA Dose Required to Maintain Hemoglobin in the Target Range, Adjusted for Hgb.39.8 Percent changeStandard Error 12.18
p-value: <0.05ANCOVA
Secondary

Comparison of Iron Delivery to the Erythron From Baseline to End of Treatment Between the Treatment Groups.

Iron delivery to the erythron was estimated by Hgb generation in response to erythropoietin (ERI, calculated as ESA dose/Hgb). In addition, ERI was also divided by body weight in kilograms to obtain a modified ERI (ERI/kg).

Time frame: 36 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SFP in Liquid BicarbonateComparison of Iron Delivery to the Erythron From Baseline to End of Treatment Between the Treatment Groups.baseline10.43 Units/kilogram/week/gram/literStandard Deviation 6.457
SFP in Liquid BicarbonateComparison of Iron Delivery to the Erythron From Baseline to End of Treatment Between the Treatment Groups.end of treatment11.71 Units/kilogram/week/gram/literStandard Deviation 9.808
Placebo: Conventional Liquid BicarbonateComparison of Iron Delivery to the Erythron From Baseline to End of Treatment Between the Treatment Groups.baseline10.38 Units/kilogram/week/gram/literStandard Deviation 6.471
Placebo: Conventional Liquid BicarbonateComparison of Iron Delivery to the Erythron From Baseline to End of Treatment Between the Treatment Groups.end of treatment14.67 Units/kilogram/week/gram/literStandard Deviation 13.804
p-value: 0.361Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Stability of Hemoglobin Over Time (Maintenance of Hemoglobin Between 9.5-11.5 g/dL.

The number of patients in each treatment group who had maintained their hemoglobin between 95 and 115 grams/liter at the end of treatment was quantified.

Time frame: 36 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
SFP in Liquid BicarbonateStability of Hemoglobin Over Time (Maintenance of Hemoglobin Between 9.5-11.5 g/dL.30 Participants
Placebo: Conventional Liquid BicarbonateStability of Hemoglobin Over Time (Maintenance of Hemoglobin Between 9.5-11.5 g/dL.30 Participants
p-value: 0.6714Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

The Amount of Supplemental Intravenous (IV) Iron Needed During Study Participation.

The absolute amount of IV iron administered to subjects in each treatment group was divided by the number of weeks on study and the number of subjects per treatment group such that the mean dose of IV iron (mg) per week per subject (for the entire treatment group) was calculated.

Time frame: 36 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SFP in Liquid BicarbonateThe Amount of Supplemental Intravenous (IV) Iron Needed During Study Participation.23.5 mg per week per subjectStandard Deviation 54.22
Placebo: Conventional Liquid BicarbonateThe Amount of Supplemental Intravenous (IV) Iron Needed During Study Participation.45.6 mg per week per subjectStandard Deviation 62.78
p-value: 0.028Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

The Distribution of Changes From Baseline in the Prescribed ESA Dose Between the Two Treatment Arms

The change from baseline in prescribed ESA dose at end-of-treatment was categorized as being greater than or equal to 25%, 10 to less than 25%, -10 to 10%, greater than -25 to -10% and less than or equal to -25%. The number of subjects in each treatment group that fit each category was compared.

Time frame: ESA dose is monitored and recorded at each dialysis session for 36 weeks.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
SFP in Liquid BicarbonateThe Distribution of Changes From Baseline in the Prescribed ESA Dose Between the Two Treatment ArmsESA dose change >10 to 25%5 Participants
SFP in Liquid BicarbonateThe Distribution of Changes From Baseline in the Prescribed ESA Dose Between the Two Treatment ArmsESA dose change > -25% to -10%3 Participants
SFP in Liquid BicarbonateThe Distribution of Changes From Baseline in the Prescribed ESA Dose Between the Two Treatment ArmsESA dose change > -10% to 10%12 Participants
SFP in Liquid BicarbonateThe Distribution of Changes From Baseline in the Prescribed ESA Dose Between the Two Treatment ArmsESA dose change < or = to -25%16 Participants
SFP in Liquid BicarbonateThe Distribution of Changes From Baseline in the Prescribed ESA Dose Between the Two Treatment ArmsESA dose change > or = to 25%16 Participants
Placebo: Conventional Liquid BicarbonateThe Distribution of Changes From Baseline in the Prescribed ESA Dose Between the Two Treatment ArmsESA dose change < or = to -25%15 Participants
Placebo: Conventional Liquid BicarbonateThe Distribution of Changes From Baseline in the Prescribed ESA Dose Between the Two Treatment ArmsESA dose change > or = to 25%20 Participants
Placebo: Conventional Liquid BicarbonateThe Distribution of Changes From Baseline in the Prescribed ESA Dose Between the Two Treatment ArmsESA dose change >10 to 25%4 Participants
Placebo: Conventional Liquid BicarbonateThe Distribution of Changes From Baseline in the Prescribed ESA Dose Between the Two Treatment ArmsESA dose change > -10% to 10%9 Participants
Placebo: Conventional Liquid BicarbonateThe Distribution of Changes From Baseline in the Prescribed ESA Dose Between the Two Treatment ArmsESA dose change > -25% to -10%3 Participants
p-value: 0.915Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026