Skip to content

Different Safety Profile of Risperidone and Paliperidone Extended-release

Different Safety Profile of Risperidone and Paliperidone Extended-release: a Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial With Healthy Volunteers

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01284959
Enrollment
34
Registered
2011-01-27
Start date
2010-06-30
Completion date
2010-12-31
Last updated
2012-10-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Schizophrenia

Keywords

cognitive function, subjective experiences, neuroleptic-induced deficit syndrome, paliperidone extended-release, risperidone

Brief summary

The main objective of this study was to assess subjective experiences related to secondary negative symptoms and cognitive performance in healthy volunteers in response to multiple doses of paliperidone ER and risperidone in a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Adverse events caused by these drugs were also evaluated.

Detailed description

A new oral antipsychotic drug, paliperidone extended-release (ER), has recently been developed and might represent an innovative approach in the treatment of schizophrenia. Paliperidone is 9-hydroxyrisperidone, the chief active metabolite of risperidone. Although paliperidone possesses a pharmacological profile very similar to that of its parent compound, it has many different pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics compared with risperidone (Pani and Marchese, 2009). First, paliperidone ER utilizes an osmotic controlled-release oral delivery system (OROS), resulting in a more stable serum concentration and reduced likelihood of causing unexpected over- or under-dosages due to CYP2D6 genetic variability. Second, paliperidone does not undergo significant hepatic metabolism, and the drug is predominantly excreted by the kidney as an unchanged drug; whereas risperidone is extensively metabolized by the CYP2D6 hepatic enzyme. Third, the off-rate for dissociation from human cloned D2 receptors in tissue culture cells is faster for paliperidone (60 s) compared with risperidone (27 min) (Seeman, 2005). Due to its looser binding to D2 receptors, paliperidone should be associated with a reduced risk of extrapyramidal side effects compared with its parent drug. Fourth, ex vivo studies have indicated that paliperidone injections induce relatively smaller H1 occupancy levels in the brains of animals when compared with similar dosages of risperidone (Schotte, et al. 1995 and 1996). This may contribute to a reduced sedative effect and less weight gain secondary to paliperidone when compared with risperidone. Finally, paliperidone has no relevant affinity toward muscarinic receptors, resulting in the absence of anticholinergic side effects; this is another important benefit compared with risperidone (Schotte, et al. 1996). Therefore, paliperidone would be the drug of choice in young psychotic patients for whom preservation or improvement of cognitive function is critical. All of these properties might be associated with improved efficacy and better tolerability of paliperidone ER compared with risperidone. In support of this view, recent studies (Canuso, et al. 2008 and 2010) demonstrated that switching from risperidone to paliperidone ER resulted in improvements in medication satisfaction, Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) (Kay, et al. 1987) score, and abbreviated Extrapyramidal Symptoms Rating Scale (Chouinard and Margolese, 2005) score. However, to date, no clinical trials have investigated the relative superiority of paliperidone ER over risperidone in terms of effects on cognitive function. Recently, interest in the negative subjective experiences secondary to antipsychotic medications has been renewed, as these experiences are key factors in adherence and clinical outcomes (Awad, 1993; van Putten and May, 1978). Artaloytia et al. (2006) reported that risperidone induced negative symptoms in healthy volunteers, which might be termed secondary negative symptoms. Therefore, we hypothesized that paliperidone ER has a better safety profile in terms of subjective experiences and cognitive function compared with risperidone. Research on the effects of antipsychotic drugs on subjective experiences and cognitive function in patients with schizophrenia may be hampered by numerous confounding factors, such as pathological features of the illness, patient motivation, or concomitant medications. Investigating the effects of antipsychotic drugs in healthy subjects provides a method for controlling these variables. Therefore, the main objective of this study was to assess subjective experiences related to secondary negative symptoms and cognitive performance in healthy volunteers in response to multiple doses of paliperidone ER and risperidone in a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Adverse events caused by these drugs were also evaluated.

Interventions

DRUGrisperidone

risperidone 3mg, PO, 3 times

DRUGpaliperidone ER

paliperidone ER 6mg, PO,3 times

DRUGplacebo

lactose PO, 3times

Sponsors

AstraZeneca
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Janssen Korea, Ltd., Korea
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Korea Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Sanofi-Synthelabo
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Chonbuk National University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 38 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Aged 18-38 years and meet no DSM-IV diagnostic criteria as assessed by using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV, research version

Exclusion criteria

Anyone who: * Participated in other clinical trials within 30 days from the start of this clinical trial or is currently participating in one * Has progressive disease or in unstable medical condition unfit for the trial * Has been diagnosed in psychiatric terms in the past, depends on psychotropic substance, or has overdosed or depended on the substance or alcohol (except for coffee or tobacco) within 1 month from the trial start * Is suicidal or highly probable of suicides; OR * Has test results considered clinically meaningful

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Assessment of Negative Symptoms and Neuroleptic Induced Deficit Syndromes by Objective Rating Scalesbaseline and 2hr after third medicationSANS(Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms), NIDSS(Neuroleptic induced Deficit Syndrome Scale) In NIDSS, the average of number 1 to 5 is blunted affect, the average of number 16 to 20 is avolition, the average of number 6 to 15 is cognition, the average of all score is total. Minimum of NIDSS(avolition, blunted affect, cognition, total) is -3, maximum is +3.(subscale score and total) '+' is better outcome, '-' is worse outcome. Minimum of SANS-Global score for alogia and blunted affect is 0, Maximum of SANS-Global score for alogia and blunted affect is 5 The higher number is worse outcome. The zeros are measured and Calcuated value This outcome measure is reporting a change between baseline and 2hr after third medication.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Assessment of Adverse Events by Objective Rating Scales and Self Report Scalesbaseline and 2hr after third medicationDIEPSS(Drug-Induced Extrapyramidal Symptoms Scale), VAS(Visual analog scale);mental sedation (alert-drowsy, muzzy-clear headed, mentally slow-quick witted, attentive-dreamy), physical sedation (strong-feeble, well coordinated-clumsy, lethargic-energetic, incompetent-proficient), tranquilization (calm-excited, contented-discontented, troubled-tranquil, tense-relaxed), and other types of feelings (happy-sad, antagonistic-amicable, interested-bored, withdrawn-gregarious) Minimum of VAS(Mental sedation score,Physical sedation score,Total score) is 0, Maximum is 10. VAS-total score is average of all subscale scores. Minimum of DIEPSS is 0, Maximum is 4. The higher number is worse outcome. The score ranges are for subscale score. This outcome measure is reporting a change between baseline and 2hr after third medication.
Assessment of Cognitive Functioning-1baseline and 50hr after third medicationCNT(Computerized Neuro-Cognitive Function Test System); The tests included a word fluency test. All of the assessments except the CNT were conducted immediately prior to administration of the medication and at 2 (for risperidone and placebo) or 24 h (for paliperidone ER) after the first and third administrations of the study medications. Minimum of Wisconsin card sorting test-Category completed is 0, Maximum is 6, the lower number is worse outcome. Minimum of Wisconsin card sorting test-Perseverative response and Trials to complete is 0, Maximum is 128, the lower number is worse outcome. Minimum of Wisconsin card sorting test-Perseverative error is 0, Maximum is 128, the higher number is worse outcome. Minimum of Word-fluency test is 0 and no maximum value, the higher number is better outcome. The score ranges are for subscale score. This outcome measure is reporting a change between baseline and 50hr after third medication.
Symptoms Assessment by Objective Rating Scalesbaseline and 50hr after third medicationSANS(Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms), NIDSS(Neuroleptic induced Deficit Syndrome Scale) Minimum of NIDSS is -3, maximum of NIDSS is +3. '+' is better outcome, '-' is worse outcome. Minimum of SNAS-Global score is 0, Maximum of SNAS-Global score is 5 The higher number is worse outcome. The zeros are measured and Calcuated value. The score ranges are for subscale score. This outcome measure is reporting a change between baseline and 50hr after third medication.
Assessment of Cognitive Functioning-2baseline and 50hr after third medicationCNT(Computerized Neuro-Cognitive Function Test System); The tests included the Stroop test, Trail-Making Test B (TMT B). All of the assessments except the CNT were conducted immediately prior to administration of the medication and at 2 (for risperidone and placebo) or 24 h (for paliperidone ER) after the first and third administrations of the study medications Minimum of Stroop test is 0, no maximum limit, the higher number is worse outcome. Minimum of Trail making test B is 0 and no maximum limit, the higher number is worse outcome. The score ranges are for subscale score. This outcome measure is reporting a change between baseline and 50hr after third medication.
Assessment of Cognitive Functioning-3baseline and 50hr after third medicationCNT(Computerized Neuro-Cognitive Function Test System); The tests included Wisconsin Card-Sorting Test (WCST). All of the assessments except the CNT were conducted immediately prior to administration of the medication and at 2 (for risperidone and placebo) or 24 h (for paliperidone ER) after the first and third administrations of the study medications. Minimum of Wisconsin card sorting test-Category completed is 0, Maximum is 6, the lower number is worse outcome. Minimum of Wisconsin card sorting test-Perseverative response and Trials to complete is 0, Maximum is 128, the lower number is worse outcome. Minimum of Wisconsin card sorting test-Trials to complete first category trials is 0, Maximum is 128 and minimum of Wisconsin card sorting test-Perseverative error is 0, Maximum is 128, the higher number is worse outcome. The score ranges are for subscale score. This outcome measure is reporting a change between baseline and 50hr after th

Countries

South Korea

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Risperidone
Drug: risperidone Groups: risperidone
11
Placebo
drug: lactose group: placebo
12
Paliperidone ER
Drug: Paliperidone ER Groups: Paliperidone ER
11
Total34

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyAdverse Event001
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject100

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlaceboPaliperidone ERRisperidoneTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
12 Participants11 Participants11 Participants34 Participants
Age Continuous28.08 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.23
30.60 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.27
28.40 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.59
28.97 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.85
Region of Enrollment
Korea, Republic of
12 participants11 participants11 participants34 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
5 Participants5 Participants7 Participants17 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
7 Participants6 Participants4 Participants17 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
5 / 112 / 120 / 11
serious
Total, serious adverse events
2 / 110 / 120 / 11

Outcome results

Primary

Assessment of Negative Symptoms and Neuroleptic Induced Deficit Syndromes by Objective Rating Scales

SANS(Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms), NIDSS(Neuroleptic induced Deficit Syndrome Scale) In NIDSS, the average of number 1 to 5 is blunted affect, the average of number 16 to 20 is avolition, the average of number 6 to 15 is cognition, the average of all score is total. Minimum of NIDSS(avolition, blunted affect, cognition, total) is -3, maximum is +3.(subscale score and total) '+' is better outcome, '-' is worse outcome. Minimum of SANS-Global score for alogia and blunted affect is 0, Maximum of SANS-Global score for alogia and blunted affect is 5 The higher number is worse outcome. The zeros are measured and Calcuated value This outcome measure is reporting a change between baseline and 2hr after third medication.

Time frame: baseline and 2hr after third medication

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RisperidoneAssessment of Negative Symptoms and Neuroleptic Induced Deficit Syndromes by Objective Rating ScalesNIDSS-Avolition-1.30 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.22
RisperidoneAssessment of Negative Symptoms and Neuroleptic Induced Deficit Syndromes by Objective Rating ScalesNIDSS-Blunted Affect-0.70 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.74
RisperidoneAssessment of Negative Symptoms and Neuroleptic Induced Deficit Syndromes by Objective Rating ScalesNIDSS-Cognition-0.54 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.53
RisperidoneAssessment of Negative Symptoms and Neuroleptic Induced Deficit Syndromes by Objective Rating ScalesNIDSS-Total-0.77 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
RisperidoneAssessment of Negative Symptoms and Neuroleptic Induced Deficit Syndromes by Objective Rating ScalesSANS-Global score for alogia0.67 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
RisperidoneAssessment of Negative Symptoms and Neuroleptic Induced Deficit Syndromes by Objective Rating ScalesSANS-Global score for blunted affect0.67 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
PlaceboAssessment of Negative Symptoms and Neuroleptic Induced Deficit Syndromes by Objective Rating ScalesSANS-Global score for blunted affect0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
PlaceboAssessment of Negative Symptoms and Neuroleptic Induced Deficit Syndromes by Objective Rating ScalesNIDSS-Avolition-0.28 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.64
PlaceboAssessment of Negative Symptoms and Neuroleptic Induced Deficit Syndromes by Objective Rating ScalesNIDSS-Total-0.06 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.35
PlaceboAssessment of Negative Symptoms and Neuroleptic Induced Deficit Syndromes by Objective Rating ScalesSANS-Global score for alogia0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
PlaceboAssessment of Negative Symptoms and Neuroleptic Induced Deficit Syndromes by Objective Rating ScalesNIDSS-Blunted Affect0.02 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.35
PlaceboAssessment of Negative Symptoms and Neuroleptic Induced Deficit Syndromes by Objective Rating ScalesNIDSS-Cognition0.02 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.26
Paliperidone ERAssessment of Negative Symptoms and Neuroleptic Induced Deficit Syndromes by Objective Rating ScalesNIDSS-Blunted Affect-0.24 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.64
Paliperidone ERAssessment of Negative Symptoms and Neuroleptic Induced Deficit Syndromes by Objective Rating ScalesNIDSS-Cognition-0.38 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.39
Paliperidone ERAssessment of Negative Symptoms and Neuroleptic Induced Deficit Syndromes by Objective Rating ScalesSANS-Global score for blunted affect0.10 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.32
Paliperidone ERAssessment of Negative Symptoms and Neuroleptic Induced Deficit Syndromes by Objective Rating ScalesNIDSS-Total-0.42 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.38
Paliperidone ERAssessment of Negative Symptoms and Neuroleptic Induced Deficit Syndromes by Objective Rating ScalesNIDSS-Avolition-0.66 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.53
Paliperidone ERAssessment of Negative Symptoms and Neuroleptic Induced Deficit Syndromes by Objective Rating ScalesSANS-Global score for alogia0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Secondary

Assessment of Adverse Events by Objective Rating Scales and Self Report Scales

DIEPSS(Drug-Induced Extrapyramidal Symptoms Scale), VAS(Visual analog scale);mental sedation (alert-drowsy, muzzy-clear headed, mentally slow-quick witted, attentive-dreamy), physical sedation (strong-feeble, well coordinated-clumsy, lethargic-energetic, incompetent-proficient), tranquilization (calm-excited, contented-discontented, troubled-tranquil, tense-relaxed), and other types of feelings (happy-sad, antagonistic-amicable, interested-bored, withdrawn-gregarious) Minimum of VAS(Mental sedation score,Physical sedation score,Total score) is 0, Maximum is 10. VAS-total score is average of all subscale scores. Minimum of DIEPSS is 0, Maximum is 4. The higher number is worse outcome. The score ranges are for subscale score. This outcome measure is reporting a change between baseline and 2hr after third medication.

Time frame: baseline and 2hr after third medication

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RisperidoneAssessment of Adverse Events by Objective Rating Scales and Self Report ScalesVAS-Total score5.41 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.82
RisperidoneAssessment of Adverse Events by Objective Rating Scales and Self Report ScalesVAS-Mental sedation score6.05 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.14
RisperidoneAssessment of Adverse Events by Objective Rating Scales and Self Report ScalesVAS-Physical sedation score5.78 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.79
RisperidoneAssessment of Adverse Events by Objective Rating Scales and Self Report ScalesDIEPSS-Bradykinesia score0.60 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.52
PlaceboAssessment of Adverse Events by Objective Rating Scales and Self Report ScalesDIEPSS-Bradykinesia score0.08 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.29
PlaceboAssessment of Adverse Events by Objective Rating Scales and Self Report ScalesVAS-Total score3.35 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.69
PlaceboAssessment of Adverse Events by Objective Rating Scales and Self Report ScalesVAS-Physical sedation score3.23 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.66
PlaceboAssessment of Adverse Events by Objective Rating Scales and Self Report ScalesVAS-Mental sedation score3.85 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.82
Paliperidone ERAssessment of Adverse Events by Objective Rating Scales and Self Report ScalesDIEPSS-Bradykinesia score0.20 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.42
Paliperidone ERAssessment of Adverse Events by Objective Rating Scales and Self Report ScalesVAS-Mental sedation score4.78 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.56
Paliperidone ERAssessment of Adverse Events by Objective Rating Scales and Self Report ScalesVAS-Physical sedation score4.08 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.94
Paliperidone ERAssessment of Adverse Events by Objective Rating Scales and Self Report ScalesVAS-Total score4.11 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.63
Secondary

Assessment of Adverse Events by Objective Rating Scales and Self Report Scales

DIEPSS(Drug-Induced Extrapyramidal Symptoms Scale), VAS(Visual analog scale);mental sedation (alert-drowsy, muzzy-clear headed, mentally slow-quick witted, attentive-dreamy), physical sedation (strong-feeble, well coordinated-clumsy, lethargic-energetic, incompetent-proficient), tranquilization (calm-excited, contented-discontented, troubled-tranquil, tense-relaxed), and other types of feelings (happy-sad, antagonistic-amicable, interested-bored, withdrawn-gregarious) Minimum of VAS is 0, Maximum is 10 Minimum of DIEPSS is 0, Maximum is 4 The higher number is worse outcome. The score ranges are for subscale score. This outcome measure is reporting a change between baseline and 50hr after third medication.

Time frame: baseline and 50hr after third medication

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RisperidoneAssessment of Adverse Events by Objective Rating Scales and Self Report ScalesVAS-Mental sedation score6.53 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.37
RisperidoneAssessment of Adverse Events by Objective Rating Scales and Self Report ScalesVAS-Physical sedation score6.25 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.5
RisperidoneAssessment of Adverse Events by Objective Rating Scales and Self Report ScalesVAS-Total score6.15 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.27
RisperidoneAssessment of Adverse Events by Objective Rating Scales and Self Report ScalesDIEPSS-Bradykinesia score0.25 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.46
PlaceboAssessment of Adverse Events by Objective Rating Scales and Self Report ScalesVAS-Mental sedation score4.21 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.87
PlaceboAssessment of Adverse Events by Objective Rating Scales and Self Report ScalesVAS-Total score3.74 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.8
PlaceboAssessment of Adverse Events by Objective Rating Scales and Self Report ScalesVAS-Physical sedation score3.69 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.9
PlaceboAssessment of Adverse Events by Objective Rating Scales and Self Report ScalesDIEPSS-Bradykinesia score0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Paliperidone ERAssessment of Adverse Events by Objective Rating Scales and Self Report ScalesVAS-Physical sedation score3.35 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.85
Paliperidone ERAssessment of Adverse Events by Objective Rating Scales and Self Report ScalesVAS-Total score3.42 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.75
Paliperidone ERAssessment of Adverse Events by Objective Rating Scales and Self Report ScalesVAS-Mental sedation score3.60 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.83
Paliperidone ERAssessment of Adverse Events by Objective Rating Scales and Self Report ScalesDIEPSS-Bradykinesia score0.10 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.32
Secondary

Assessment of Cognitive Functioning-1

CNT(Computerized Neuro-Cognitive Function Test System); The tests included a word fluency test. All of the assessments except the CNT were conducted immediately prior to administration of the medication and at 2 (for risperidone and placebo) or 24 h (for paliperidone ER) after the first and third administrations of the study medications. Minimum of Wisconsin card sorting test-Category completed is 0, Maximum is 6, the lower number is worse outcome. Minimum of Wisconsin card sorting test-Perseverative response and Trials to complete is 0, Maximum is 128, the lower number is worse outcome. Minimum of Wisconsin card sorting test-Perseverative error is 0, Maximum is 128, the higher number is worse outcome. Minimum of Word-fluency test is 0 and no maximum value, the higher number is better outcome. The score ranges are for subscale score. This outcome measure is reporting a change between baseline and 50hr after third medication.

Time frame: baseline and 50hr after third medication

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RisperidoneAssessment of Cognitive Functioning-1Word-fluency test-ㅅ17.44 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.85
RisperidoneAssessment of Cognitive Functioning-1Word-fluency test-ㄱ17.44 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.68
RisperidoneAssessment of Cognitive Functioning-1Word-fluency test-Animal22.22 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.46
RisperidoneAssessment of Cognitive Functioning-1Word-fluency test-Stationery22.56 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.58
RisperidoneAssessment of Cognitive Functioning-1Word-fluency test-ㅇ16.11 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.11
PlaceboAssessment of Cognitive Functioning-1Word-fluency test-ㄱ19.75 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.54
PlaceboAssessment of Cognitive Functioning-1Word-fluency test-Animal25.42 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.12
PlaceboAssessment of Cognitive Functioning-1Word-fluency test-Stationery26.00 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.24
PlaceboAssessment of Cognitive Functioning-1Word-fluency test-ㅅ18.25 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.85
PlaceboAssessment of Cognitive Functioning-1Word-fluency test-ㅇ17.17 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.73
Paliperidone ERAssessment of Cognitive Functioning-1Word-fluency test-ㅇ16.70 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.27
Paliperidone ERAssessment of Cognitive Functioning-1Word-fluency test-ㅅ16.40 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.17
Paliperidone ERAssessment of Cognitive Functioning-1Word-fluency test-Animal23.50 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.22
Paliperidone ERAssessment of Cognitive Functioning-1Word-fluency test-ㄱ17.10 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.13
Paliperidone ERAssessment of Cognitive Functioning-1Word-fluency test-Stationery23.60 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.7
Secondary

Assessment of Cognitive Functioning-2

CNT(Computerized Neuro-Cognitive Function Test System); The tests included the Stroop test, Trail-Making Test B (TMT B). All of the assessments except the CNT were conducted immediately prior to administration of the medication and at 2 (for risperidone and placebo) or 24 h (for paliperidone ER) after the first and third administrations of the study medications Minimum of Stroop test is 0, no maximum limit, the higher number is worse outcome. Minimum of Trail making test B is 0 and no maximum limit, the higher number is worse outcome. The score ranges are for subscale score. This outcome measure is reporting a change between baseline and 50hr after third medication.

Time frame: baseline and 50hr after third medication

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RisperidoneAssessment of Cognitive Functioning-2Trail making test B29.78 millisecondsStandard Deviation 10.24
RisperidoneAssessment of Cognitive Functioning-2Stroop test-Interference score6.43 millisecondsStandard Deviation 1.77
RisperidoneAssessment of Cognitive Functioning-2Stroop test-Color15.40 millisecondsStandard Deviation 4.51
RisperidoneAssessment of Cognitive Functioning-2Stroop test-Word-color21.84 millisecondsStandard Deviation 4.53
PlaceboAssessment of Cognitive Functioning-2Trail making test B28.42 millisecondsStandard Deviation 7.45
PlaceboAssessment of Cognitive Functioning-2Stroop test-Color13.09 millisecondsStandard Deviation 1.67
PlaceboAssessment of Cognitive Functioning-2Stroop test-Word-color17.53 millisecondsStandard Deviation 2.97
PlaceboAssessment of Cognitive Functioning-2Stroop test-Interference score4.44 millisecondsStandard Deviation 2.01
Paliperidone ERAssessment of Cognitive Functioning-2Trail making test B31.10 millisecondsStandard Deviation 8.66
Paliperidone ERAssessment of Cognitive Functioning-2Stroop test-Interference score5.63 millisecondsStandard Deviation 2.71
Paliperidone ERAssessment of Cognitive Functioning-2Stroop test-Color12.68 millisecondsStandard Deviation 1.7
Paliperidone ERAssessment of Cognitive Functioning-2Stroop test-Word-color18.31 millisecondsStandard Deviation 3.29
Secondary

Assessment of Cognitive Functioning-3

CNT(Computerized Neuro-Cognitive Function Test System); The tests included Wisconsin Card-Sorting Test (WCST). All of the assessments except the CNT were conducted immediately prior to administration of the medication and at 2 (for risperidone and placebo) or 24 h (for paliperidone ER) after the first and third administrations of the study medications. Minimum of Wisconsin card sorting test-Category completed is 0, Maximum is 6, the lower number is worse outcome. Minimum of Wisconsin card sorting test-Perseverative response and Trials to complete is 0, Maximum is 128, the lower number is worse outcome. Minimum of Wisconsin card sorting test-Trials to complete first category trials is 0, Maximum is 128 and minimum of Wisconsin card sorting test-Perseverative error is 0, Maximum is 128, the higher number is worse outcome. The score ranges are for subscale score. This outcome measure is reporting a change between baseline and 50hr after th

Time frame: baseline and 50hr after third medication

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RisperidoneAssessment of Cognitive Functioning-3Wisconsin card sorting test-Category completed6.00 trialsStandard Deviation 0
RisperidoneAssessment of Cognitive Functioning-3Wisconsin card sorting test-Perseverative response14.11 trialsStandard Deviation 6.03
RisperidoneAssessment of Cognitive Functioning-3Wisconsin card sorting test-Perseverative error10.00 trialsStandard Deviation 3.5
RisperidoneAssessment of Cognitive Functioning-3WCST-Trials to complete first category trials14.00 trialsStandard Deviation 7.98
PlaceboAssessment of Cognitive Functioning-3WCST-Trials to complete first category trials11.75 trialsStandard Deviation 2.01
PlaceboAssessment of Cognitive Functioning-3Wisconsin card sorting test-Category completed6.00 trialsStandard Deviation 0
PlaceboAssessment of Cognitive Functioning-3Wisconsin card sorting test-Perseverative error9.67 trialsStandard Deviation 6.11
PlaceboAssessment of Cognitive Functioning-3Wisconsin card sorting test-Perseverative response13.08 trialsStandard Deviation 8.11
Paliperidone ERAssessment of Cognitive Functioning-3WCST-Trials to complete first category trials12.10 trialsStandard Deviation 2.42
Paliperidone ERAssessment of Cognitive Functioning-3Wisconsin card sorting test-Perseverative response10.10 trialsStandard Deviation 2.96
Paliperidone ERAssessment of Cognitive Functioning-3Wisconsin card sorting test-Perseverative error6.50 trialsStandard Deviation 1.18
Paliperidone ERAssessment of Cognitive Functioning-3Wisconsin card sorting test-Category completed6.00 trialsStandard Deviation 0
Secondary

Symptoms Assessment by Objective Rating Scales

SANS(Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms), NIDSS(Neuroleptic induced Deficit Syndrome Scale) Minimum of NIDSS is -3, maximum of NIDSS is +3. '+' is better outcome, '-' is worse outcome. Minimum of SNAS-Global score is 0, Maximum of SNAS-Global score is 5 The higher number is worse outcome. The zeros are measured and Calcuated value. The score ranges are for subscale score. This outcome measure is reporting a change between baseline and 50hr after third medication.

Time frame: baseline and 50hr after third medication

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RisperidoneSymptoms Assessment by Objective Rating ScalesNIDSS-Cognition-0.66 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.57
RisperidoneSymptoms Assessment by Objective Rating ScalesNIDSS-Avolition-0.85 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
RisperidoneSymptoms Assessment by Objective Rating ScalesNIDSS-Blunted Affect-0.70 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.64
RisperidoneSymptoms Assessment by Objective Rating ScalesNIDSS-Total-0.72 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.59
RisperidoneSymptoms Assessment by Objective Rating ScalesSANS-Global score for alogia0.13 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.35
RisperidoneSymptoms Assessment by Objective Rating ScalesSANS-Global score for blunted affect0.25 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.46
PlaceboSymptoms Assessment by Objective Rating ScalesNIDSS-Blunted Affect-0.27 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.34
PlaceboSymptoms Assessment by Objective Rating ScalesNIDSS-Cognition-0.26 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.39
PlaceboSymptoms Assessment by Objective Rating ScalesNIDSS-Total-0.29 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.41
PlaceboSymptoms Assessment by Objective Rating ScalesSANS-Global score for blunted affect0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
PlaceboSymptoms Assessment by Objective Rating ScalesSANS-Global score for alogia0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
PlaceboSymptoms Assessment by Objective Rating ScalesNIDSS-Avolition-0.37 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.72
Paliperidone ERSymptoms Assessment by Objective Rating ScalesNIDSS-Avolition0.14 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.78
Paliperidone ERSymptoms Assessment by Objective Rating ScalesSANS-Global score for alogia0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Paliperidone ERSymptoms Assessment by Objective Rating ScalesNIDSS-Cognition0.28 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.61
Paliperidone ERSymptoms Assessment by Objective Rating ScalesSANS-Global score for blunted affect0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Paliperidone ERSymptoms Assessment by Objective Rating ScalesNIDSS-Blunted Affect0.04 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.67
Paliperidone ERSymptoms Assessment by Objective Rating ScalesNIDSS-Total0.19 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.63

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026