Skip to content

Comparison of Two Dose Regimens of Snake Antivenom for the Treatment of Snake Bites Envenoming in Nepal

A Randomized, Double-blind, Clinical Trial of Two Dose Regimens of VINS Polyvalent Antivenom (ATC J06AA03) for the Treatment of Snake Bites With Neurotoxic Envenoming in Nepal

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01284855
Enrollment
250
Registered
2011-01-27
Start date
2011-04-30
Completion date
2013-03-20
Last updated
2017-02-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Snake Bite

Keywords

neurotoxic envenoming (WHO ICD-10 T63.0)

Brief summary

This study aims at comparing two doses of antivenom in the treatment of snake bite envenoming. It will take place in 3 centers in rural Nepal and will involve 250 snake bite victims presenting with one or more sign of neurotoxic envenoming. The objective of the study is to generate enough scientific evidence to improve Nepal's current national guidelines for the management of snake bites.

Detailed description

Snake bites are considered as one of the major neglected public health issues of tropical areas. They occur chiefly in developing countries and mainly affect poor rural communities. Besides the inadequate supply, distribution and accessibility of antivenom, a major problem is the absence of standardized and adequate treatment protocol. There is a significant diversity in clinical practices, in particular concerning the dose of antivenom given. Additionally, antivenom is often given even in the absence of a clear indication for envenoming. Altogether, this leads to an incredible waste of a scarce and costly resource. In Nepal there are gross disparities in the management and outcomes of snake bite envenoming. The country's national guidelines, issued in 2004, prescribe an initial antivenom dose that is 5 times less than the one advocated by most experts. The dosage recommended by the National guidelines is not based on scientific or clinical evidence, and currently, there is confusion about the adequate dose to be administered. Some physicians follow recommendations published by experts, others follow the National guidelines, but for most, dosage is arbitrary. These discrepancies directly impact on morbidity and mortality and lead to wastage of a costly treatment that few can afford. The principal objective of the study is to establish unequivocally which dosage regimen is the most appropriate for the treatment of snake bite neurotoxic envenoming. It is a randomized, double-blind, clinical trial comparing high and low initial doses of snake polyvalent antivenom also known as Anti Snake Venom Serum (ASVS). 250 snake bite victims showing signs of neurotoxic envenoming will be enrolled over 2 years in three health centres of Southern Nepal. Each participant will initially receive either 2 vials or 10 vials of snake polyvalent antivenom. Mortality, the proportion of patients needing assisted respiration, and the percentage of patients who show worsening of neurotoxic signs and therefore require additional doses of antivenom will be compared in both arms. The kinetics of recovery and the total consumption of antivenom will also be compared. Finally, the incidence and severity of early and late adverse reactions to antivenom will be assessed. The economical impact of snake bite envenoming will also be determined by measuring direct and indirect costs to both health services and individual victims. Because they chiefly affect agricultural workers and children, snake bites have serious economic consequences, a fact that is frequently overlooked by national authorities.

Interventions

DRUGAntivenom

Polyvalent antivenom directed against Indian spectacled cobra (N. naja), common Indian krait (B. caeruleus), saw-scaled viper (Echis carinatus) and Russell's viper.

Sponsors

CTU
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
5 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* History of snake bite; AND * Age ≥ 5 years; AND * Informed consent obtained; AND * Showing one or more signs of neurotoxic envenoming

Exclusion criteria

* Subject unlikely to co-operate in the study * Pregnant or breastfeeding women * Patients presenting more than 24 hours after the bite * Patients requiring ventilation support at the time of presentation * Subjects with previous history of snake bite with envenoming * Patients who already received antivenom before presenting to the study centre * Patients with pre-existing neurological or muscular disorders * Subjects with known history of allergy to horse proteins * Patients with proven viper bites

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Composite endpoint: Number of patients who either 1) died, or 2) needed assisted ventilation, or 3) showed a worsening of envenoming signs during hospital stayParticipants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 5 daysThe endpoint is composite and includes the number of patients who * die during hospitalization * are put under assisted ventilation during hospitalization * necessitate additional doses of antivenom because of a worsening of neurotoxicity. A worsening of neurotoxicity will be defined as the appearance of 2 new neurotoxic signs OR the appearance of a severe neurotoxic sign (i.e. loss of gag reflex or paradoxical breathing)
Number of patients with a Serious Adverse EventsLast follow-up visit (6 months after randomization)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to recoveryParticipants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 5 daysTime between admission to the health centre and the disappearance of all neurotoxic sign s
Total cost of treatmentLast follow-up visit (6 months after randomization)Including direct (antivenom and other drugs costs, costs of hospitalization, and costs of Adverse Events management)and indirect costs (working days missed)
MortalityParticipants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 5 daysNumber of deaths
Number of patients who needed assisted ventilation during hospitalizationParticipants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 5 days
Number of patients who showed a worsening of neurotoxicity during hospitalizationParticipants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 5 days
Number of patients with Adverse EventsLast follow-up visit (6 months after randomization)
Total amount of antivenom administeredParticipants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 5 days

Countries

Nepal

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 26, 2026