Skip to content

A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Sifalimumab in Adults With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

A Phase 2b, Dose-ranging Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Sifalimumab in Adults With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01283139
Enrollment
834
Registered
2011-01-25
Start date
2011-03-31
Completion date
2014-04-17
Last updated
2018-04-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Keywords

SLE, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, Sifalimumab, MEDI-545

Brief summary

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of sifalimumab compared to placebo in subjects with moderately to severely active Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE).

Detailed description

This is a Phase 2b, multinational, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled, parallel group study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of three intravenous (IV) treatment regimens of sifalimumab (200, 600, or 1,200 mg) in adult subjects with chronic moderately-to-severely active SLE with an inadequate response to standard of care (SOC) for SLE.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALSifalimumab 200 mg

Sifalimumab 200 mg intravenously every 2 weeks for 4 weeks and then monthly for 44 weeks for a total of 14 doses.

BIOLOGICALSifalimumab 600 mg

Sifalimumab 600 mg intravenously every 2 weeks for 4 weeks and then monthly for 44 weeks for a total of 14 doses.

BIOLOGICALSifalimumab 1,200 mg

Sifalimumab 1,200 mg intravenously every 2 weeks for 4 weeks and then monthly for 44 weeks for a total of 14 doses.

OTHERPlacebo

IV Placebo every 2 weeks for 4 weeks and then monthly for 44 weeks

Sponsors

MedImmune LLC
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

- Fulfills at least 4 of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) including a positive antinuclear antibody (ANA) or elevated ds-deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) or Sm antibody at screening - Disease history of SLE greater than or equal to (\>=) 24 weeks at screening - Weight more than (\>) 40 kilogram (kg) - Currently receiving stable dose of oral prednisone and/or antimalarials/immunosuppressives - Active moderate to severe SLE disease based on SLE disease activity score (SLEDAI) and British Isles Lupus Assessment Group Index (BILAG) and Physicians Global Assessment - No evidence of cervical malignancy on PAP within 6 months of randomization - Female subjects must be willing to avoid pregnancy - Negative TB test or newly positive TB test due to latent TB for which treatment must be initiated at or before randomization.

Exclusion criteria

- Active severe SLE-driven renal disease or unstable renal disease prior to screening - Active severe or unstable neuropsychiatric SLE - Clinically significant active infection including ongoing and chronic infections - History of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) - Confirmed Positive tests for Hepatitis B or positive test for hepatitis C - History of severe herpes infection such as herpes encephalitis, ophthalmic herpes, disseminated herpes - Herpes Zoster within 3 months of screening - History of cancer other than basal cancer or cervical cancer treated with apparent success \>=1 year prior to randomization - Receipt of a biologic agent within 5 half-lives or prior to loss of pharmacodynamic and/or clinical effect (whichever is longer) prior to screening - Live or attenuated vaccine within 4 weeks prior to screening - Subjects with substance abuse - Subjects with significant hematologic abnormalities.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Achieving a Response in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index 4 (SRI [4])Day 365SRI (4) responder is defined as: 1) a reduction in baseline Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) disease activity score of greater than or equal to (\>=) 4 points (with increased deoxyribonucleic acid \[DNA\] binding item of SLEDAI-2K score based on the ANA Multi-Lyte® ANA-II Plus Test System); 2) no worsening in Physician Global Assessment (MDGA) (worsening is defined as an increase of \>=0.3 from baseline on a 0-3 visual analogue scale) and 3) no worsening in British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG-2004) (worsening is defined as at least 1 new 'A' score or 2 new 'B' scores on the BILAG-2004 compared with baseline).
Percentage of Participants Achieving a Positive Response in SRI (4) in 4-Gene Interferon Test High ParticipantsDay 365SRI (4) responder is defined as: 1) a reduction in baseline SLEDAI-2K disease activity score of \>=4 points (with increased DNA binding item of SLEDAI-2K score based on the ANA Multi-Lyte® ANA-II Plus Test System); 2) no worsening in Physician Global Assessment (MDGA) (worsening is defined as an increase of \>=0.3 from baseline on a 0-3 visual analogue scale) and 3) no worsening in BILAG-2004 (worsening is defined as at least 1 new 'A' score or 2 new 'B' scores on the BILAG-2004 compared with baseline).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Greater Than 3-Point Improvement in the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue ScaleDay 365FACIT-F is a 13-item questionnaire. Participants scored each item on a 5-point scale: 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). Larger the participant's response to the questions (with the exception of 2 negatively stated), greater was the participant's fatigue. For all questions, except for the 2 negatively stated ones, the code was reversed and a new score was calculated as (4 minus the participant's response). The sum of all responses resulted in the FACIT-Fatigue score for a total possible score of 0 (worse score) to 52 (better score).
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)Day 1 up to Week 74An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. A serious adverse event (SAE) was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent defined as events present at baseline that worsened in intensity after administration of investigational product or events absent at baseline that emerged after administration of investigational product, for the period extending until the end of participant participation in the study.
Percentage of Participants on Greater Than or Equal to 10 mg/Day Oral Prednisone (or Equivalent) at Baseline Who Were Able to Reduce to Less Than or Equal to (<=) 7.5 mg/DayDay 365Percentage of participants on \>=10 mg/day oral corticosteroids (OCS) at baseline who were able to taper it to \<=7.5 mg/day by Day 365 were recorded.
Number of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Day 1 up to Week 61Vital sign assessments included blood pressure, pulse rate, temperature, weight and respiratory rate. Vital signs abnormalities recorded as TEAEs were reported.
Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings Reported as TEAEsDay 1 up to Week 56The 12-lead ECG data were summarized and evaluated. Number of participants with clinically significant abnormal ECG findings as assessed by cardiologist were recorded and reported as TEAEs.
Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Day 1 up to Week 61Laboratory investigations included hematology, serum chemistries and urinalysis parameters. Participants with clinically significant abnormalities in these laboratory investigations recorded as TEAEs were reported.
Percentage of Participants With a Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity and Severity Index (CLASI) Activity Score Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 10 at Baseline Who Achieved a >= 4-point ReductionDay 365The CLASI consists of two scores, the first summarizes the activity of the disease while the second is a measure of the damage done by the disease. Activity is scored on the basis of erythema, scale/hyperkeratosis, mucous membrane involvement, acute hair loss and non-scarring alopecia. Damage is scored in terms of dyspigmentation and scarring, including scarring alopecia. The percentage of participants with a CLASI activity score \>=10 at baseline who achieved a clinically significant (\>=4-point) reduction at Day 365 were reported.

Countries

Argentina, Brazil, Bulgaria, Canada, Chile, France, Germany, Hungary, India, Italy, Jamaica, Mexico, Netherlands, Peru, Philippines, Poland, Romania, South Africa, Spain, Thailand, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

A total of 834 participants were screened out of which 402 participants did not meet eligibility criteria and were considered screen failures, and 432 participants were randomized into the study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
Placebo matching to sifalimumab administered by intravenous infusion at a fixed dose of every 2 weeks (14 days) for the first 3 doses (Days 1, 15, and 29) and then every 4 weeks (28 days) thereafter for 11 doses for a total of 14 doses.
108
Sifalimumab 200 Milligram (mg)
Sifalimumab 200 mg administered by intravenous infusion every 2 weeks (14 days) for the first 3 doses (Days 1, 15, and 29) and then every 4 weeks (28 days) thereafter for 11 doses for a total of 14 doses.
108
Sifalimumab 600 mg
Sifalimumab 600 mg administered by intravenous infusion every 2 weeks (14 days) for the first 3 doses (Days 1, 15, and 29) and then every 4 weeks (28 days) thereafter for 11 doses for a total of 14 doses.
109
Sifalimumab 1,200 mg
Sifalimumab 1,200 mg administered by intravenous infusion every 2 weeks (14 days) for the first 3 doses (Days 1, 15, and 29) and then every 4 weeks (28 days) thereafter for 11 doses for a total of 14 doses.
107
Total432

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Overall StudyDeath2022
Overall StudyEarly termination due to AE/SAE1100
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy1221
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up5231
Overall StudyMissed follow-up visit0122
Overall StudyParticipant randomized in error0010
Overall StudyParticipant's refusal to continue0311
Overall StudyPregnancy0110
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject8868

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlaceboSifalimumab 200 Milligram (mg)Sifalimumab 600 mgSifalimumab 1,200 mgTotal
Age, Continuous38.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.3
39.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.4
40.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.3
39.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.1
39.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.7
Sex: Female, Male
Female
101 Participants103 Participants98 Participants97 Participants399 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
7 Participants5 Participants11 Participants10 Participants33 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
93 / 10894 / 10896 / 10892 / 107
serious
Total, serious adverse events
19 / 10816 / 10822 / 10821 / 107

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants Achieving a Positive Response in SRI (4) in 4-Gene Interferon Test High Participants

SRI (4) responder is defined as: 1) a reduction in baseline SLEDAI-2K disease activity score of \>=4 points (with increased DNA binding item of SLEDAI-2K score based on the ANA Multi-Lyte® ANA-II Plus Test System); 2) no worsening in Physician Global Assessment (MDGA) (worsening is defined as an increase of \>=0.3 from baseline on a 0-3 visual analogue scale) and 3) no worsening in BILAG-2004 (worsening is defined as at least 1 new 'A' score or 2 new 'B' scores on the BILAG-2004 compared with baseline).

Time frame: Day 365

Population: The mITT population included all randomized participants who received any investigational product and had a baseline primary efficacy measurement. Here, N signifies number of participants with positive diagnostic test.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving a Positive Response in SRI (4) in 4-Gene Interferon Test High Participants42.0 percentage of participants
Sifalimumab 200 Milligram (mg)Percentage of Participants Achieving a Positive Response in SRI (4) in 4-Gene Interferon Test High Participants57.5 percentage of participants
Sifalimumab 600 mgPercentage of Participants Achieving a Positive Response in SRI (4) in 4-Gene Interferon Test High Participants50.0 percentage of participants
Sifalimumab 1,200 mgPercentage of Participants Achieving a Positive Response in SRI (4) in 4-Gene Interferon Test High Participants57.5 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.04290% CI: [1.13, 3.14]Regression, Logistic
p-value: 0.26490% CI: [0.85, 2.35]Regression, Logistic
p-value: 0.03890% CI: [1.14, 3.19]Regression, Logistic
Primary

Percentage of Participants Achieving a Response in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index 4 (SRI [4])

SRI (4) responder is defined as: 1) a reduction in baseline Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) disease activity score of greater than or equal to (\>=) 4 points (with increased deoxyribonucleic acid \[DNA\] binding item of SLEDAI-2K score based on the ANA Multi-Lyte® ANA-II Plus Test System); 2) no worsening in Physician Global Assessment (MDGA) (worsening is defined as an increase of \>=0.3 from baseline on a 0-3 visual analogue scale) and 3) no worsening in British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG-2004) (worsening is defined as at least 1 new 'A' score or 2 new 'B' scores on the BILAG-2004 compared with baseline).

Time frame: Day 365

Population: The modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population included all randomized participants who received any investigational product and had a baseline primary efficacy measurement.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving a Response in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index 4 (SRI [4])45.4 percentage of participants
Sifalimumab 200 Milligram (mg)Percentage of Participants Achieving a Response in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index 4 (SRI [4])58.3 percentage of participants
Sifalimumab 600 mgPercentage of Participants Achieving a Response in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index 4 (SRI [4])56.5 percentage of participants
Sifalimumab 1,200 mgPercentage of Participants Achieving a Response in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index 4 (SRI [4])59.8 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.05790% CI: [1.03, 2.71]Regression, Logistic
p-value: 0.09490% CI: [1.01, 2.54]Regression, Logistic
p-value: 0.03190% CI: [1.16, 2.94]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

Laboratory investigations included hematology, serum chemistries and urinalysis parameters. Participants with clinically significant abnormalities in these laboratory investigations recorded as TEAEs were reported.

Time frame: Day 1 up to Week 61

Population: The safety population included all participants who received any investigational product.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Lymphopenia1 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)White blood cell count increased3 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Neutrophil count increased3 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Iron deficiency anaemia1 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Haemoglobin decreased0 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Lymphocyte count decreased2 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)White blood cell count decreased1 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Autoimmune haemolytic anaemia1 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Eosinophilia0 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Haematocrit increased0 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Haemoglobin increased0 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Leukopenia0 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Anaemia1 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Neutropenia3 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Neutrophil count decreased1 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Platelet count increased0 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Red blood cell count decreased0 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Thrombocytopenia0 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Platelet count decreased2 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Monocyte count increased1 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Hypokalaemia4 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Alanine aminotransferase increased5 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Gamma-glutamyltransferase increased5 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Hypertriglyceridaemia2 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Dyslipidaemia2 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Hepatic enzyme increased2 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Aspartate aminotransferase increased2 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Blood creatine phosphokinase increased2 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Blood creatinine increased0 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Blood glucose increased1 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Hyperglycaemia1 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Transaminases increased1 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Blood potassium decreased0 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Low density lipoprotein increased0 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Blood albumin decreased0 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Blood alkaline phosphatase decreased1 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Blood calcium increased1 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Blood cholesterol increased0 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Blood homocysteine increased0 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Liver function test abnormal1 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Hyperlipidaemia0 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Hypoalbuminaemia2 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Hypoglycaemia0 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Blood bilirubin increased1 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Hypocalcaemia1 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Blood triglycerides increased1 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Hyperbilirubinaemia0 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Hypertransaminasaemia0 participants
Sifalimumab 200 Milligram (mg)Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Lymphopenia1 participants
Sifalimumab 200 Milligram (mg)Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Dyslipidaemia0 participants
Sifalimumab 200 Milligram (mg)Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Red blood cell count decreased0 participants
Sifalimumab 200 Milligram (mg)Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Hypertransaminasaemia0 participants
Sifalimumab 200 Milligram (mg)Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Hypoglycaemia0 participants
Sifalimumab 200 Milligram (mg)Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Hepatic enzyme increased2 participants
Sifalimumab 200 Milligram (mg)Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Autoimmune haemolytic anaemia1 participants
Sifalimumab 200 Milligram (mg)Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Blood alkaline phosphatase decreased0 participants
Sifalimumab 200 Milligram (mg)Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)White blood cell count decreased0 participants
Sifalimumab 200 Milligram (mg)Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Aspartate aminotransferase increased1 participants
Sifalimumab 200 Milligram (mg)Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Hyperlipidaemia0 participants
Sifalimumab 200 Milligram (mg)Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Blood albumin decreased0 participants
Sifalimumab 200 Milligram (mg)Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Low density lipoprotein increased1 participants
Sifalimumab 200 Milligram (mg)Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Blood creatine phosphokinase increased0 participants
Sifalimumab 200 Milligram (mg)Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Thrombocytopenia1 participants
Sifalimumab 200 Milligram (mg)Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Hypocalcaemia0 participants
Sifalimumab 200 Milligram (mg)Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Blood potassium decreased1 participants
Sifalimumab 200 Milligram (mg)Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Blood creatinine increased1 participants
Sifalimumab 200 Milligram (mg)Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Haemoglobin increased0 participants
Sifalimumab 200 Milligram (mg)Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Transaminases increased0 participants
Sifalimumab 200 Milligram (mg)Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Blood bilirubin increased0 participants
Sifalimumab 200 Milligram (mg)Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Blood glucose increased0 participants
Sifalimumab 200 Milligram (mg)Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Lymphocyte count decreased1 participants
Sifalimumab 200 Milligram (mg)Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Hyperglycaemia0 participants
Sifalimumab 200 Milligram (mg)Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Leukopenia1 participants
Sifalimumab 200 Milligram (mg)Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Platelet count decreased0 participants
Sifalimumab 200 Milligram (mg)Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Neutrophil count decreased0 participants
Sifalimumab 200 Milligram (mg)Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Blood cholesterol increased0 participants
Sifalimumab 200 Milligram (mg)Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Haemoglobin decreased1 participants
Sifalimumab 200 Milligram (mg)Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Monocyte count increased0 participants
Sifalimumab 200 Milligram (mg)Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Liver function test abnormal0 participants
Sifalimumab 200 Milligram (mg)Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Blood triglycerides increased0 participants
Sifalimumab 200 Milligram (mg)Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Hyperbilirubinaemia0 participants
Sifalimumab 200 Milligram (mg)Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Hypokalaemia1 participants
Sifalimumab 200 Milligram (mg)Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Haematocrit increased0 participants
Sifalimumab 200 Milligram (mg)Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Iron deficiency anaemia2 participants
Sifalimumab 200 Milligram (mg)Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Hypoalbuminaemia0 participants
Sifalimumab 200 Milligram (mg)Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Alanine aminotransferase increased1 participants
Sifalimumab 200 Milligram (mg)Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Blood homocysteine increased0 participants
Sifalimumab 200 Milligram (mg)Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Neutrophil count increased1 participants
Sifalimumab 200 Milligram (mg)Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Platelet count increased0 participants
Sifalimumab 200 Milligram (mg)Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Gamma-glutamyltransferase increased0 participants
Sifalimumab 200 Milligram (mg)Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Neutropenia0 participants
Sifalimumab 200 Milligram (mg)Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)White blood cell count increased1 participants
Sifalimumab 200 Milligram (mg)Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Blood calcium increased0 participants
Sifalimumab 200 Milligram (mg)Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Hypertriglyceridaemia1 participants
Sifalimumab 200 Milligram (mg)Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Eosinophilia0 participants
Sifalimumab 200 Milligram (mg)Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Anaemia4 participants
Sifalimumab 600 mgNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Red blood cell count decreased0 participants
Sifalimumab 600 mgNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Lymphopenia0 participants
Sifalimumab 600 mgNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Neutropenia0 participants
Sifalimumab 600 mgNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Liver function test abnormal1 participants
Sifalimumab 600 mgNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Neutrophil count decreased0 participants
Sifalimumab 600 mgNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Platelet count increased1 participants
Sifalimumab 600 mgNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Hypertransaminasaemia1 participants
Sifalimumab 600 mgNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Thrombocytopenia0 participants
Sifalimumab 600 mgNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Hyperlipidaemia0 participants
Sifalimumab 600 mgNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Platelet count decreased0 participants
Sifalimumab 600 mgNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Monocyte count increased0 participants
Sifalimumab 600 mgNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Hypokalaemia4 participants
Sifalimumab 600 mgNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Alanine aminotransferase increased1 participants
Sifalimumab 600 mgNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Hypoalbuminaemia1 participants
Sifalimumab 600 mgNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Gamma-glutamyltransferase increased1 participants
Sifalimumab 600 mgNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Hypertriglyceridaemia1 participants
Sifalimumab 600 mgNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Hyperbilirubinaemia1 participants
Sifalimumab 600 mgNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Dyslipidaemia2 participants
Sifalimumab 600 mgNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Hepatic enzyme increased2 participants
Sifalimumab 600 mgNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Hypoglycaemia0 participants
Sifalimumab 600 mgNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Aspartate aminotransferase increased0 participants
Sifalimumab 600 mgNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Blood creatine phosphokinase increased2 participants
Sifalimumab 600 mgNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Blood creatinine increased0 participants
Sifalimumab 600 mgNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Blood glucose increased0 participants
Sifalimumab 600 mgNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Blood bilirubin increased0 participants
Sifalimumab 600 mgNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Hyperglycaemia0 participants
Sifalimumab 600 mgNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Transaminases increased1 participants
Sifalimumab 600 mgNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Blood potassium decreased1 participants
Sifalimumab 600 mgNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Low density lipoprotein increased1 participants
Sifalimumab 600 mgNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Hypocalcaemia0 participants
Sifalimumab 600 mgNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Blood albumin decreased1 participants
Sifalimumab 600 mgNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Blood alkaline phosphatase decreased0 participants
Sifalimumab 600 mgNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Anaemia4 participants
Sifalimumab 600 mgNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)White blood cell count increased2 participants
Sifalimumab 600 mgNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Blood calcium increased1 participants
Sifalimumab 600 mgNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Neutrophil count increased2 participants
Sifalimumab 600 mgNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Iron deficiency anaemia0 participants
Sifalimumab 600 mgNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Haemoglobin decreased0 participants
Sifalimumab 600 mgNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Lymphocyte count decreased1 participants
Sifalimumab 600 mgNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Blood cholesterol increased1 participants
Sifalimumab 600 mgNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)White blood cell count decreased1 participants
Sifalimumab 600 mgNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Autoimmune haemolytic anaemia0 participants
Sifalimumab 600 mgNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Blood triglycerides increased1 participants
Sifalimumab 600 mgNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Eosinophilia0 participants
Sifalimumab 600 mgNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Haematocrit increased1 participants
Sifalimumab 600 mgNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Blood homocysteine increased1 participants
Sifalimumab 600 mgNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Haemoglobin increased1 participants
Sifalimumab 600 mgNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Leukopenia0 participants
Sifalimumab 1,200 mgNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Dyslipidaemia2 participants
Sifalimumab 1,200 mgNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Hypertriglyceridaemia3 participants
Sifalimumab 1,200 mgNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Leukopenia0 participants
Sifalimumab 1,200 mgNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Anaemia2 participants
Sifalimumab 1,200 mgNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Hypoalbuminaemia0 participants
Sifalimumab 1,200 mgNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Gamma-glutamyltransferase increased4 participants
Sifalimumab 1,200 mgNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Platelet count increased0 participants
Sifalimumab 1,200 mgNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)White blood cell count increased3 participants
Sifalimumab 1,200 mgNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Haemoglobin increased0 participants
Sifalimumab 1,200 mgNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Alanine aminotransferase increased3 participants
Sifalimumab 1,200 mgNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Eosinophilia1 participants
Sifalimumab 1,200 mgNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Neutrophil count increased2 participants
Sifalimumab 1,200 mgNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Blood calcium increased0 participants
Sifalimumab 1,200 mgNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Hypokalaemia5 participants
Sifalimumab 1,200 mgNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Liver function test abnormal0 participants
Sifalimumab 1,200 mgNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Iron deficiency anaemia2 participants
Sifalimumab 1,200 mgNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Monocyte count increased0 participants
Sifalimumab 1,200 mgNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Hyperlipidaemia1 participants
Sifalimumab 1,200 mgNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Neutrophil count decreased1 participants
Sifalimumab 1,200 mgNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Haemoglobin decreased1 participants
Sifalimumab 1,200 mgNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Platelet count decreased0 participants
Sifalimumab 1,200 mgNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Thrombocytopenia0 participants
Sifalimumab 1,200 mgNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Blood homocysteine increased0 participants
Sifalimumab 1,200 mgNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Lymphocyte count decreased0 participants
Sifalimumab 1,200 mgNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Haematocrit increased0 participants
Sifalimumab 1,200 mgNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Blood glucose increased2 participants
Sifalimumab 1,200 mgNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Red blood cell count decreased1 participants
Sifalimumab 1,200 mgNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Hyperglycaemia2 participants
Sifalimumab 1,200 mgNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Blood bilirubin increased0 participants
Sifalimumab 1,200 mgNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Blood creatinine increased1 participants
Sifalimumab 1,200 mgNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Lymphopenia0 participants
Sifalimumab 1,200 mgNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Transaminases increased1 participants
Sifalimumab 1,200 mgNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Hypertransaminasaemia0 participants
Sifalimumab 1,200 mgNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Hyperbilirubinaemia0 participants
Sifalimumab 1,200 mgNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)White blood cell count decreased1 participants
Sifalimumab 1,200 mgNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Blood potassium decreased0 participants
Sifalimumab 1,200 mgNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Blood creatine phosphokinase increased0 participants
Sifalimumab 1,200 mgNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Hypoglycaemia1 participants
Sifalimumab 1,200 mgNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Blood cholesterol increased0 participants
Sifalimumab 1,200 mgNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Low density lipoprotein increased0 participants
Sifalimumab 1,200 mgNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Blood triglycerides increased0 participants
Sifalimumab 1,200 mgNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Aspartate aminotransferase increased2 participants
Sifalimumab 1,200 mgNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Neutropenia1 participants
Sifalimumab 1,200 mgNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Blood albumin decreased0 participants
Sifalimumab 1,200 mgNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Hypocalcaemia0 participants
Sifalimumab 1,200 mgNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Hepatic enzyme increased0 participants
Sifalimumab 1,200 mgNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Autoimmune haemolytic anaemia0 participants
Sifalimumab 1,200 mgNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Blood alkaline phosphatase decreased1 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings Reported as TEAEs

The 12-lead ECG data were summarized and evaluated. Number of participants with clinically significant abnormal ECG findings as assessed by cardiologist were recorded and reported as TEAEs.

Time frame: Day 1 up to Week 56

Population: The safety population included all participants who received any investigational product.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings Reported as TEAEs2 participants
Sifalimumab 200 Milligram (mg)Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings Reported as TEAEs0 participants
Sifalimumab 600 mgNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings Reported as TEAEs1 participants
Sifalimumab 1,200 mgNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings Reported as TEAEs0 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

Vital sign assessments included blood pressure, pulse rate, temperature, weight and respiratory rate. Vital signs abnormalities recorded as TEAEs were reported.

Time frame: Day 1 up to Week 61

Population: The safety population included all participants who received any investigational product.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Orthostatic hypotension1 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Hypertensive crisis0 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Hypotension1 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Blood pressure increased1 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Weight increased0 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Hypertension7 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Weight decreased1 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Chills1 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Pyrexia3 participants
Sifalimumab 200 Milligram (mg)Number of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Chills2 participants
Sifalimumab 200 Milligram (mg)Number of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Orthostatic hypotension0 participants
Sifalimumab 200 Milligram (mg)Number of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Hypertensive crisis0 participants
Sifalimumab 200 Milligram (mg)Number of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Hypertension4 participants
Sifalimumab 200 Milligram (mg)Number of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Pyrexia2 participants
Sifalimumab 200 Milligram (mg)Number of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Weight increased1 participants
Sifalimumab 200 Milligram (mg)Number of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Hypotension0 participants
Sifalimumab 200 Milligram (mg)Number of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Weight decreased0 participants
Sifalimumab 200 Milligram (mg)Number of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Blood pressure increased2 participants
Sifalimumab 600 mgNumber of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Chills0 participants
Sifalimumab 600 mgNumber of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Pyrexia6 participants
Sifalimumab 600 mgNumber of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Hypertension5 participants
Sifalimumab 600 mgNumber of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Weight increased2 participants
Sifalimumab 600 mgNumber of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Blood pressure increased1 participants
Sifalimumab 600 mgNumber of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Hypertensive crisis0 participants
Sifalimumab 600 mgNumber of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Orthostatic hypotension0 participants
Sifalimumab 600 mgNumber of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Weight decreased0 participants
Sifalimumab 600 mgNumber of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Hypotension0 participants
Sifalimumab 1,200 mgNumber of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Orthostatic hypotension1 participants
Sifalimumab 1,200 mgNumber of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Blood pressure increased0 participants
Sifalimumab 1,200 mgNumber of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Weight increased2 participants
Sifalimumab 1,200 mgNumber of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Hypotension0 participants
Sifalimumab 1,200 mgNumber of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Weight decreased1 participants
Sifalimumab 1,200 mgNumber of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Hypertension4 participants
Sifalimumab 1,200 mgNumber of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Hypertensive crisis1 participants
Sifalimumab 1,200 mgNumber of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Chills1 participants
Sifalimumab 1,200 mgNumber of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Pyrexia7 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)

An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. A serious adverse event (SAE) was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent defined as events present at baseline that worsened in intensity after administration of investigational product or events absent at baseline that emerged after administration of investigational product, for the period extending until the end of participant participation in the study.

Time frame: Day 1 up to Week 74

Population: The safety population included all participants who received any investigational product.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)TESAE19 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)TEAE94 participants
Sifalimumab 200 Milligram (mg)Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)TESAE16 participants
Sifalimumab 200 Milligram (mg)Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)TEAE97 participants
Sifalimumab 600 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)TEAE97 participants
Sifalimumab 600 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)TESAE22 participants
Sifalimumab 1,200 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)TESAE21 participants
Sifalimumab 1,200 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)TEAE93 participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants on Greater Than or Equal to 10 mg/Day Oral Prednisone (or Equivalent) at Baseline Who Were Able to Reduce to Less Than or Equal to (<=) 7.5 mg/Day

Percentage of participants on \>=10 mg/day oral corticosteroids (OCS) at baseline who were able to taper it to \<=7.5 mg/day by Day 365 were recorded.

Time frame: Day 365

Population: The mITT population included all randomized participants who received any investigational product and had a baseline primary efficacy measurement. Here, N signifies number of participants on \>=10 mg/day oral prednisone (or equivalent) at baseline.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants on Greater Than or Equal to 10 mg/Day Oral Prednisone (or Equivalent) at Baseline Who Were Able to Reduce to Less Than or Equal to (<=) 7.5 mg/DayReduce OCS to <=7.5 mg/day: Yes6.5 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants on Greater Than or Equal to 10 mg/Day Oral Prednisone (or Equivalent) at Baseline Who Were Able to Reduce to Less Than or Equal to (<=) 7.5 mg/DayReduce OCS to <=7.5 mg/day: No93.5 percentage of participants
Sifalimumab 200 Milligram (mg)Percentage of Participants on Greater Than or Equal to 10 mg/Day Oral Prednisone (or Equivalent) at Baseline Who Were Able to Reduce to Less Than or Equal to (<=) 7.5 mg/DayReduce OCS to <=7.5 mg/day: No91.8 percentage of participants
Sifalimumab 200 Milligram (mg)Percentage of Participants on Greater Than or Equal to 10 mg/Day Oral Prednisone (or Equivalent) at Baseline Who Were Able to Reduce to Less Than or Equal to (<=) 7.5 mg/DayReduce OCS to <=7.5 mg/day: Yes8.2 percentage of participants
Sifalimumab 600 mgPercentage of Participants on Greater Than or Equal to 10 mg/Day Oral Prednisone (or Equivalent) at Baseline Who Were Able to Reduce to Less Than or Equal to (<=) 7.5 mg/DayReduce OCS to <=7.5 mg/day: Yes9.4 percentage of participants
Sifalimumab 600 mgPercentage of Participants on Greater Than or Equal to 10 mg/Day Oral Prednisone (or Equivalent) at Baseline Who Were Able to Reduce to Less Than or Equal to (<=) 7.5 mg/DayReduce OCS to <=7.5 mg/day: No90.6 percentage of participants
Sifalimumab 1,200 mgPercentage of Participants on Greater Than or Equal to 10 mg/Day Oral Prednisone (or Equivalent) at Baseline Who Were Able to Reduce to Less Than or Equal to (<=) 7.5 mg/DayReduce OCS to <=7.5 mg/day: Yes6.2 percentage of participants
Sifalimumab 1,200 mgPercentage of Participants on Greater Than or Equal to 10 mg/Day Oral Prednisone (or Equivalent) at Baseline Who Were Able to Reduce to Less Than or Equal to (<=) 7.5 mg/DayReduce OCS to <=7.5 mg/day: No93.8 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.80890% CI: [0.37, 3.81]Regression, Logistic
p-value: 0.59890% CI: [0.45, 4.66]Regression, Logistic
p-value: 0.88490% CI: [0.27, 3.02]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Greater Than 3-Point Improvement in the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue Scale

FACIT-F is a 13-item questionnaire. Participants scored each item on a 5-point scale: 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). Larger the participant's response to the questions (with the exception of 2 negatively stated), greater was the participant's fatigue. For all questions, except for the 2 negatively stated ones, the code was reversed and a new score was calculated as (4 minus the participant's response). The sum of all responses resulted in the FACIT-Fatigue score for a total possible score of 0 (worse score) to 52 (better score).

Time frame: Day 365

Population: The mITT population included all randomized participants who received any investigational product and had a baseline primary efficacy measurement. Here, N signifies number of participants with a FACIT-fatigue score \<49 at baseline.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a Greater Than 3-Point Improvement in the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue ScaleAchieved > 3-point improvement: Yes30.5 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a Greater Than 3-Point Improvement in the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue ScaleAchieved > 3-point improvement: No69.5 percentage of participants
Sifalimumab 200 Milligram (mg)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Greater Than 3-Point Improvement in the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue ScaleAchieved > 3-point improvement: No61.9 percentage of participants
Sifalimumab 200 Milligram (mg)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Greater Than 3-Point Improvement in the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue ScaleAchieved > 3-point improvement: Yes38.1 percentage of participants
Sifalimumab 600 mgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a Greater Than 3-Point Improvement in the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue ScaleAchieved > 3-point improvement: Yes42.2 percentage of participants
Sifalimumab 600 mgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a Greater Than 3-Point Improvement in the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue ScaleAchieved > 3-point improvement: No57.8 percentage of participants
Sifalimumab 1,200 mgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a Greater Than 3-Point Improvement in the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue ScaleAchieved > 3-point improvement: Yes35.6 percentage of participants
Sifalimumab 1,200 mgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a Greater Than 3-Point Improvement in the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue ScaleAchieved > 3-point improvement: No64.4 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.2790% CI: [0.85, 2.25]Regression, Logistic
p-value: 0.07790% CI: [1.04, 2.74]Regression, Logistic
p-value: 0.45390% CI: [0.76, 2.05]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With a Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity and Severity Index (CLASI) Activity Score Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 10 at Baseline Who Achieved a >= 4-point Reduction

The CLASI consists of two scores, the first summarizes the activity of the disease while the second is a measure of the damage done by the disease. Activity is scored on the basis of erythema, scale/hyperkeratosis, mucous membrane involvement, acute hair loss and non-scarring alopecia. Damage is scored in terms of dyspigmentation and scarring, including scarring alopecia. The percentage of participants with a CLASI activity score \>=10 at baseline who achieved a clinically significant (\>=4-point) reduction at Day 365 were reported.

Time frame: Day 365

Population: The mITT population included all randomized participants who received any investigational product and had a baseline primary efficacy measurement. Here, N signifies number of participants with a CLASI activity score \>=10 at baseline.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With a Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity and Severity Index (CLASI) Activity Score Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 10 at Baseline Who Achieved a >= 4-point ReductionAchieved >=4-point reduction: Yes48.6 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With a Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity and Severity Index (CLASI) Activity Score Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 10 at Baseline Who Achieved a >= 4-point ReductionAchieved >=4-point reduction: No51.4 percentage of participants
Sifalimumab 200 Milligram (mg)Percentage of Participants With a Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity and Severity Index (CLASI) Activity Score Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 10 at Baseline Who Achieved a >= 4-point ReductionAchieved >=4-point reduction: No27.3 percentage of participants
Sifalimumab 200 Milligram (mg)Percentage of Participants With a Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity and Severity Index (CLASI) Activity Score Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 10 at Baseline Who Achieved a >= 4-point ReductionAchieved >=4-point reduction: Yes72.7 percentage of participants
Sifalimumab 600 mgPercentage of Participants With a Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity and Severity Index (CLASI) Activity Score Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 10 at Baseline Who Achieved a >= 4-point ReductionAchieved >=4-point reduction: Yes57.6 percentage of participants
Sifalimumab 600 mgPercentage of Participants With a Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity and Severity Index (CLASI) Activity Score Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 10 at Baseline Who Achieved a >= 4-point ReductionAchieved >=4-point reduction: No42.4 percentage of participants
Sifalimumab 1,200 mgPercentage of Participants With a Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity and Severity Index (CLASI) Activity Score Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 10 at Baseline Who Achieved a >= 4-point ReductionAchieved >=4-point reduction: Yes73.1 percentage of participants
Sifalimumab 1,200 mgPercentage of Participants With a Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity and Severity Index (CLASI) Activity Score Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 10 at Baseline Who Achieved a >= 4-point ReductionAchieved >=4-point reduction: No26.9 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.04490% CI: [1.22, 7.01]Regression, Logistic
p-value: 0.49890% CI: [0.62, 3.19]Regression, Logistic
p-value: 0.04990% CI: [1.2, 7.68]Regression, Logistic

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 13, 2026