Skip to content

Study to Compare Laser Assisted New Attachment Procedure (LANAP) to Traditional Treatments of Chronic Periodontitis

A Multi-Center Single Blind Study of the Laser Assisted New Attachment Procedure Compared to Scaling and Root Planing Alone, Modified Widman Flap Surgery, and Coronal Debridement Alone in the Treatment of Chronic Periodontitis

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01282229
Acronym
LANAP
Enrollment
59
Registered
2011-01-24
Start date
2010-10-31
Completion date
2014-10-31
Last updated
2015-10-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Periodontitis

Keywords

LANAP, Laser dentistry

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the Laser Assisted New Attachment Procedure (LANAP protocol) using the Free-running (FR) Pulsed Neodimium: Yttrium aluminium garnet (Nd:YAG) laser to Scaling and Root Planing (SRP) alone, Modified Widman Flap (MFF) surgery, and Coronal Debridement (CD) alone with respect to periodontal clinical attachment level gain.

Detailed description

This multi-center study of the Laser Assisted New Attachment Procedure (LANAP protocol) using the FR Pulsed Nd:YAG laser compared to Scaling and Root Planing alone, Modified Widman Flap (MWF) surgery, and Coronal Debridement (CD) alone will utilize a single-blind, four-quadrant split-mouth design with MWF as the positive control, CD as a weak positive control and SRP as the standard treatment control. The study will be conducted at three (3) to five (5) investigational centers. Subjects will receive the Laser Assisted New Attachment Procedure (LANAP protocol) using the pulsed FR Nd:YAG laser, Scaling and Root Planing alone, Modified Widman Flap surgery, and Coronal Debridement alone each in one quadrant of their mouth at Baseline. Treatment modalities are randomly assigned to quadrants at the time of treatment. Efficacy evaluations, including clinical attachment level (CAL), probing depth (PD), and bleeding on probing (BOP) will be performed at Baseline, month 6, and month 12 using a Florida Electronic Probe. Radiographs will be taken at Screening/Baseline and at month 6 and month 12.

Interventions

DEVICELANAP

Laser Assisted New Attachment Procedure (LANAP protocol) using the FR Pulsed Nd:YAG laser

Sponsors

Institute for Advanced Laser Dentistry
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
25 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Subjects will have chronic adult periodontitis as characterized by all four quadrants of the mouth. 2. Subjects will be 25-75 years of age. 3. Subjects will be able to follow verbal and/or written instructions, perform Oral Hygiene according to the protocol, and return to the center for specified study visits. 4. Subjects must have had no subgingival scaling instrumentation including scaling and root planing, regular periodontal maintenance procedures or any subgingival cleaning \< 12 (twelve) months prior to Baseline examination. 5. Subjects must have had no history of periodontal surgical procedures of any type prior to Baseline examination. 6. Subjects must be non-smokers of any type or former smokers (\>6 (six) months stopped), and not using or taking any nicotine product. 7. Subjects will have clinical and/or radiographic evidence of subgingival calculus in each quadrant. 8. Subjects have no more than one missing tooth per quadrant, excluding 3rd molars. 9. Subjects will be able to sign the informed consent form.

Exclusion criteria

1. Subject receiving subgingival scaling instrumentation including scaling and root planing, regular periodontal maintenance procedures or any subgingival cleaning less than twelve (12) months prior to Baseline examination. 2. Subjects receiving periodontal surgery of any type prior to Baseline examination. 3. Subjects with dental implants. 4. Subjects with a compromised heart condition, history of rheumatic fever, or joint replacement requiring prophylaxis. 5. Subjects having taken systemic cancer therapy and/or radiation therapy at any time 6. Subjects with clinically significant acute or concurrent illness 7. Subjects with clinically significant chronic illness. 8. Subjects with a disease of the connective tissue. 9. Subjects taking medications which are likely to cause gingival hyperplasia, within ONE MONTH prior to Baseline examination 10. Subjects taking antimicrobials within ONE MONTH prior to Baseline examination 11. Subjects taking non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs at a therapeutic dose within the TWO WEEKS prior to Baseline examination. 12. Subjects taking steroids of any kind within ONE MONTH prior to baseline examination. 13. Subjects taking continuous low doses of tetracycline within THREE MONTHS prior to Baseline examination 14. Subjects taking an investigational drug within TWO MONTHS prior to Baseline examination 15. Subjects taking or having taken bisphosphonates of any kind for any reason. 16. Female, nonsterile subjects who are pregnant or lactating. 17. Subjects who, in the investigator's opinion, would not comply with the study procedures. 18. Smokers of any type or former smokers and subjects that take or use any nicotine product. 19. Excessive alcohol intake. 20. No current restorative or endodontic treatment needs

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Gain in Clinical Attachment Level of Periodontal TissuesBaseline, 6, 12 monthsPeriodontitis causes loss of attachment of the tooth root to the surrounding bone. Change in Clinical Attachment Level (CAL) estimates the number of mm's of reattachment gained as a result of the treatment.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Probing Depth (PD)Baseline, 6, 12 monthsPositive numbers indicate average decrease in probing depth (improvement).
Change in Bleeding on Probing (BOP)Baseline, 6, 12 monthsPercent of pockets within a quadrant that changed from baseline to 6 or 12 months. Negative numbers are a decrease in bleeding on probing which represents clinical improvement. Each quadrant within the patient represents one of four treatments, the unit of analysis. Pockets are replications within treatments and vary in number among quadrants.
Change in Gingival IndexBaseline, 6, 12 monthsThe gingival index is a 0-4 unit scale that the examiner uses to estimate the amount of edema and erythema at 2 locations (lingual and buccal) for every tooth in the quadrant. Zero (0) represents no redness and swelling and four (4) represents severe redness and swelling. Negative numbers are a decrease in in examiner estimate of erythema and edema and represent an improvement in clinical outcome.
Discomfort1-7 daysSubjects recorded in a diary discomfort on a 10 point visual analog scale daily for the week following treatment. Subjects provided an estimate for each of the four treated quadrants. Zero (0) represents no pain or discomfort and ten (10) represents severe pain and/or discomfort. For each subject discomfort scores on each day from Day 1 to Day 7 were summed. Medians and ranges for each treatment are recorded. The total score could range from 0 to 70.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
All Participants
Subjects will receive the Laser Assisted New Attachment Procedure (LANAP protocol) using the pulsed FR Nd:YAG laser, Scaling and Root Planing alone, Modified Widman Flap surgery, and Coronal Debridement alone each in one randomized quadrant of their mouth at Baseline.
57
Total57

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyProtocol Violation2

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAll Participants
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
6 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
51 Participants
Average Clinical Attachment Level (CAL)
PD = 5-6mm (Coronal Debridement)
5.468 mm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.486
Average Clinical Attachment Level (CAL)
PD = 5-6mm (LANAP Quadrant)
5.431 mm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.301
Average Clinical Attachment Level (CAL)
PD = 5-6mm ( Modified Widman Flap)
5.440 mm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.349
Average Clinical Attachment Level (CAL)
PD = 5-6mm (Scaling and Root Planing)
5.364 mm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.244
Average Clinical Attachment Level (CAL)
PD >= 7mm (Coronal Debridement)
7.681 mm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.659
Average Clinical Attachment Level (CAL)
PD >= 7mm (LANAP Quadrant)
7.453 mm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.594
Average Clinical Attachment Level (CAL)
PD >= 7mm (Modified Widman Flap)
7.737 mm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.586
Average Clinical Attachment Level (CAL)
PD >= 7mm (Scaling and Root Planing)
7.528 mm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.751
Average Probing Depth (PD)
PD = 5-6mm (Coronal Debridement)
5.382 mm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.554
Average Probing Depth (PD)
PD = 5-6mm (LANAP Quadrant)
5.364 mm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.553
Average Probing Depth (PD)
PD = 5-6mm ( Modified Widman Flap)
5.358 mm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.569
Average Probing Depth (PD)
PD = 5-6mm (Scaling and Root Planing)
5.358 mm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.57
Average Probing Depth (PD)
PD >= 7mm (Coronal Debridement)
7.672 mm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.069
Average Probing Depth (PD)
PD >= 7mm (LANAP Quadrant)
7.606 mm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.867
Average Probing Depth (PD)
PD >= 7mm (Modified Widman Flap)
7.562 mm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.901
Average Probing Depth (PD)
PD >= 7mm (Scaling and Root Planing)
7.657 mm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.967
Bleeding on Probing (BOP)
Coronal Debridement
47.5 percentage of pockets
STANDARD_DEVIATION 31.2
Bleeding on Probing (BOP)
LANAP Quadrant
49.4 percentage of pockets
STANDARD_DEVIATION 31.4
Bleeding on Probing (BOP)
Modified Widman Flap
46.5 percentage of pockets
STANDARD_DEVIATION 31.2
Bleeding on Probing (BOP)
Scaling and Root Planing
48.2 percentage of pockets
STANDARD_DEVIATION 30.6
Gingival Index (GI)
Coronal Debridement
2.43 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.95
Gingival Index (GI)
LANAP Quadrant
2.48 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.95
Gingival Index (GI)
Modified Widman Flap
2.42 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.95
Gingival Index (GI)
Scaling and Root Planing
2.44 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.96
Sex: Female, Male
Female
27 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
30 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 590 / 590 / 590 / 59
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 590 / 590 / 590 / 59

Outcome results

Primary

Gain in Clinical Attachment Level of Periodontal Tissues

Periodontitis causes loss of attachment of the tooth root to the surrounding bone. Change in Clinical Attachment Level (CAL) estimates the number of mm's of reattachment gained as a result of the treatment.

Time frame: Baseline, 6, 12 months

Population: 5-6 mm baseline PD partition had a different sample size than the 7+mm partition.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LANAP Quadrant (5-6mm Pockets)Gain in Clinical Attachment Level of Periodontal TissuesChange in CAL @ 12 mo1.498 mmStandard Deviation 1.638
LANAP Quadrant (5-6mm Pockets)Gain in Clinical Attachment Level of Periodontal TissuesChange in CAL @ 6 mo1.361 mmStandard Deviation 1.736
LANAP Quadrant (≥7mm Pockets)Gain in Clinical Attachment Level of Periodontal TissuesChange in CAL @ 6 mo2.387 mmStandard Deviation 2.038
LANAP Quadrant (≥7mm Pockets)Gain in Clinical Attachment Level of Periodontal TissuesChange in CAL @ 12 mo2.458 mmStandard Deviation 2.005
Modified Widman Flap (5-6mm Pockets)Gain in Clinical Attachment Level of Periodontal TissuesChange in CAL @ 6 mo1.180 mmStandard Deviation 1.587
Modified Widman Flap (5-6mm Pockets)Gain in Clinical Attachment Level of Periodontal TissuesChange in CAL @ 12 mo1.229 mmStandard Deviation 1.588
Modified Widman Flap (≥7mm Pockets)Gain in Clinical Attachment Level of Periodontal TissuesChange in CAL @ 12 mo2.120 mmStandard Deviation 1.84
Modified Widman Flap (≥7mm Pockets)Gain in Clinical Attachment Level of Periodontal TissuesChange in CAL @ 6 mo2.329 mmStandard Deviation 1.909
Scaling and Root Planing (5-6mm Pockets)Gain in Clinical Attachment Level of Periodontal TissuesChange in CAL @ 6 mo1.347 mmStandard Deviation 1.833
Scaling and Root Planing (5-6mm Pockets)Gain in Clinical Attachment Level of Periodontal TissuesChange in CAL @ 12 mo1.425 mmStandard Deviation 1.81
Scaling and Root Planing (≥7mm Pockets)Gain in Clinical Attachment Level of Periodontal TissuesChange in CAL @ 12 mo2.330 mmStandard Deviation 2.137
Scaling and Root Planing (≥7mm Pockets)Gain in Clinical Attachment Level of Periodontal TissuesChange in CAL @ 6 mo2.061 mmStandard Deviation 2.243
Coronal Debridement (5-6mm Pockets)Gain in Clinical Attachment Level of Periodontal TissuesChange in CAL @ 6 mo0.796 mmStandard Deviation 1.723
Coronal Debridement (5-6mm Pockets)Gain in Clinical Attachment Level of Periodontal TissuesChange in CAL @ 12 mo1.033 mmStandard Deviation 1.857
Coronal Debridement (≥7mm Pockets)Gain in Clinical Attachment Level of Periodontal TissuesChange in CAL @ 12 mo1.762 mmStandard Deviation 2.082
Coronal Debridement (≥7mm Pockets)Gain in Clinical Attachment Level of Periodontal TissuesChange in CAL @ 6 mo1.573 mmStandard Deviation 1.945
Secondary

Change in Bleeding on Probing (BOP)

Percent of pockets within a quadrant that changed from baseline to 6 or 12 months. Negative numbers are a decrease in bleeding on probing which represents clinical improvement. Each quadrant within the patient represents one of four treatments, the unit of analysis. Pockets are replications within treatments and vary in number among quadrants.

Time frame: Baseline, 6, 12 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LANAP Quadrant (5-6mm Pockets)Change in Bleeding on Probing (BOP)change @ 6 mo-24.9 percentage of pockets that bledStandard Deviation 32.7
LANAP Quadrant (5-6mm Pockets)Change in Bleeding on Probing (BOP)change @ 12mo-23.0 percentage of pockets that bledStandard Deviation 29.7
LANAP Quadrant (≥7mm Pockets)Change in Bleeding on Probing (BOP)change @ 12mo-20.4 percentage of pockets that bledStandard Deviation 28.2
LANAP Quadrant (≥7mm Pockets)Change in Bleeding on Probing (BOP)change @ 6 mo-22.9 percentage of pockets that bledStandard Deviation 30.7
Modified Widman Flap (5-6mm Pockets)Change in Bleeding on Probing (BOP)change @ 6 mo-23.7 percentage of pockets that bledStandard Deviation 28
Modified Widman Flap (5-6mm Pockets)Change in Bleeding on Probing (BOP)change @ 12mo-20.1 percentage of pockets that bledStandard Deviation 27.7
Modified Widman Flap (≥7mm Pockets)Change in Bleeding on Probing (BOP)change @ 6 mo-18.0 percentage of pockets that bledStandard Deviation 31.2
Modified Widman Flap (≥7mm Pockets)Change in Bleeding on Probing (BOP)change @ 12mo-15.7 percentage of pockets that bledStandard Deviation 28.4
Secondary

Change in Gingival Index

The gingival index is a 0-4 unit scale that the examiner uses to estimate the amount of edema and erythema at 2 locations (lingual and buccal) for every tooth in the quadrant. Zero (0) represents no redness and swelling and four (4) represents severe redness and swelling. Negative numbers are a decrease in in examiner estimate of erythema and edema and represent an improvement in clinical outcome.

Time frame: Baseline, 6, 12 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LANAP Quadrant (5-6mm Pockets)Change in Gingival Index6 months-1.28 units on a scale from 0-4Standard Deviation 1.28
LANAP Quadrant (5-6mm Pockets)Change in Gingival Index12 months-1.29 units on a scale from 0-4Standard Deviation 1.19
LANAP Quadrant (≥7mm Pockets)Change in Gingival Index12 months-1.27 units on a scale from 0-4Standard Deviation 1.22
LANAP Quadrant (≥7mm Pockets)Change in Gingival Index6 months-1.30 units on a scale from 0-4Standard Deviation 1.31
Modified Widman Flap (5-6mm Pockets)Change in Gingival Index6 months-1.28 units on a scale from 0-4Standard Deviation 1.27
Modified Widman Flap (5-6mm Pockets)Change in Gingival Index12 months-1.26 units on a scale from 0-4Standard Deviation 1.2
Modified Widman Flap (≥7mm Pockets)Change in Gingival Index6 months-1.14 units on a scale from 0-4Standard Deviation 1.28
Modified Widman Flap (≥7mm Pockets)Change in Gingival Index12 months-1.14 units on a scale from 0-4Standard Deviation 1.22
Secondary

Change in Probing Depth (PD)

Positive numbers indicate average decrease in probing depth (improvement).

Time frame: Baseline, 6, 12 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LANAP Quadrant (5-6mm Pockets)Change in Probing Depth (PD)5-6mm @ 6 mo1.674 mmStandard Deviation 1.402
LANAP Quadrant (5-6mm Pockets)Change in Probing Depth (PD)5-6mm @ 12 mo1.888 mmStandard Deviation 1.446
LANAP Quadrant (5-6mm Pockets)Change in Probing Depth (PD)>=7mm @ 6 mo2.716 mmStandard Deviation 1.832
LANAP Quadrant (5-6mm Pockets)Change in Probing Depth (PD)>=7mm @ 12 mo3.097 mmStandard Deviation 1.766
LANAP Quadrant (≥7mm Pockets)Change in Probing Depth (PD)5-6mm @ 12 mo1.831 mmStandard Deviation 1.305
LANAP Quadrant (≥7mm Pockets)Change in Probing Depth (PD)>=7mm @ 6 mo3.117 mmStandard Deviation 1.585
LANAP Quadrant (≥7mm Pockets)Change in Probing Depth (PD)>=7mm @ 12 mo3.004 mmStandard Deviation 1.581
LANAP Quadrant (≥7mm Pockets)Change in Probing Depth (PD)5-6mm @ 6 mo1.834 mmStandard Deviation 1.263
Modified Widman Flap (5-6mm Pockets)Change in Probing Depth (PD)>=7mm @ 6 mo2.525 mmStandard Deviation 1.897
Modified Widman Flap (5-6mm Pockets)Change in Probing Depth (PD)5-6mm @ 12 mo1.702 mmStandard Deviation 1.556
Modified Widman Flap (5-6mm Pockets)Change in Probing Depth (PD)>=7mm @ 12 mo2.846 mmStandard Deviation 2.001
Modified Widman Flap (5-6mm Pockets)Change in Probing Depth (PD)5-6mm @ 6 mo1.550 mmStandard Deviation 1.486
Modified Widman Flap (≥7mm Pockets)Change in Probing Depth (PD)>=7mm @ 12 mo2.108 mmStandard Deviation 1.959
Modified Widman Flap (≥7mm Pockets)Change in Probing Depth (PD)5-6mm @ 12 mo1.223 mmStandard Deviation 1.749
Modified Widman Flap (≥7mm Pockets)Change in Probing Depth (PD)5-6mm @ 6 mo1.084 mmStandard Deviation 1.544
Modified Widman Flap (≥7mm Pockets)Change in Probing Depth (PD)>=7mm @ 6 mo1.976 mmStandard Deviation 1.773
Secondary

Discomfort

Subjects recorded in a diary discomfort on a 10 point visual analog scale daily for the week following treatment. Subjects provided an estimate for each of the four treated quadrants. Zero (0) represents no pain or discomfort and ten (10) represents severe pain and/or discomfort. For each subject discomfort scores on each day from Day 1 to Day 7 were summed. Medians and ranges for each treatment are recorded. The total score could range from 0 to 70.

Time frame: 1-7 days

Population: Subjects with missing data (e.g., missing diary entries) are not included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
LANAP Quadrant (5-6mm Pockets)Discomfort10 sum of units on a scale
LANAP Quadrant (≥7mm Pockets)Discomfort19 sum of units on a scale
Modified Widman Flap (5-6mm Pockets)Discomfort4.4 sum of units on a scale
Modified Widman Flap (≥7mm Pockets)Discomfort3.5 sum of units on a scale

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026