Skip to content

Staying Active With Arthritis: RCT of Physical Activity for Older Adults With Osteoarthritis and Hypertension

Promoting Physical Activity in Older Adults With Comorbidity

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01280903
Acronym
STAR
Enrollment
182
Registered
2011-01-21
Start date
2012-01-31
Completion date
2015-04-30
Last updated
2024-09-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hypertension, Osteoarthritis, Knee

Keywords

Osteoarthritis, Knee, Hypertension, Exercise, Physical activity, Self Efficacy, Patient Compliance, Aged

Brief summary

The purpose of the Staying Active with Arthritis (STAR) research study is to determine if a 6-month program will improve leg exercise, fitness walking, and clinical outcomes (function, blood pressure, leg strength, pain, fatigue, and health-related quality of life) in older adults with osteoarthritis of the knee and high blood pressure.

Detailed description

Over 9 million Americans have symptomatic osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee, a chronic disease associated with frequent joint pain, functional limitations, and quadriceps weakness that intrude upon everyday life. At least half of those with OA of the knee are diagnosed with hypertension or high blood pressure (HBP), one of the most prevalent risk factors for cardiovascular disease. Many other individuals with OA of the knee unknowingly have HBP and remain untreated. Our own work and that of others suggest that persons with OA of the knee experience reductions in BP when they participate in a regular regimen of physical activity. Even small decreases in systolic and diastolic BP found with physical activity are clinically significant, e.g., a 2 mm Hg decrease reduces the risk of stroke by 14% - 17%, and the risk of coronary heart disease is reduced by 6% - 9%. Yet, only 15% of persons with OA and 47% with HBP engage in regular physical activity. The purpose of this study is to investigate how the individually delivered, home-based, 6-month modified Staying Active with Arthritis (STAR) intervention, guided by self-efficacy theory and modified to address comorbid HBP, affects lower extremity exercise (flexibility, strengthening, and balance), fitness walking, functional status, BP, quadriceps strength, pain, fatigue, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in a convenience sample of 224 adults age 50 years or older with OA of the knee and HBP. Using a randomized controlled, 2-group design, we (1) hypothesize that at the end of the 6-month intervention period and 6 months after the intervention period ends those who receive the modified STAR intervention will be more likely to perform lower extremity exercise, participate in fitness walking, show improvements in objective functional status, and demonstrate reductions in BP than those who receive attention-control. Secondarily, we will (2) evaluate the impact of the modified STAR intervention, compared to attention-control, on subjective functional status, quadriceps strength, pain, fatigue, and HRQoL at both time points; (3) explore the impact of the modified STAR intervention, compared to attention-control, on self-efficacy and outcome expectancy at both time points; (4) explore the relationship between self-efficacy and outcome expectancy; and (5) explore the extent to which self-efficacy and outcome expectancy mediate the relationship between the modified STAR intervention and performance of lower extremity exercise and participation in fitness walking. Data will be analyzed using repeated measures modeling.

Interventions

The 24-week modified Staying Active with Arthritis (STAR) intervention, guided by self-efficacy theory and modified to address comorbid hypertension, consists of 6 weekly individual face-to-face exercise sessions by a licensed physical therapist, 9 biweekly telephone counseling sessions by a registered nurse to continue the use of self-efficacy strategies, and lower extremity exercise and fitness walking being carried out at home between sessions. There will be no contact with participants during weeks 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, and 23. During the 6-month follow-up period, the participants will be contacted briefly by telephone by a registered nurse at weeks 30, 36, and 48 for a general check-up.

Attention-Control is a 24-week general health education program for older adults that consists of 6 weekly telephone sessions by a registered nurse followed by 9 biweekly telephone sessions by a registered nurse. There will be no contact with participants during weeks 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, and 23. Topics include cancer screenings; immunizations; osteoporosis; low vision; hearing loss; talking with your primary care provider; eating healthy (two parts); sleep and aging; injury prevention (two parts: balance problems and falls); oral health; foot care; and mental health (depression). During the 6-month follow-up period, the participants will be contacted briefly by telephone by a registered nurse at weeks 30, 36, and 48 for a general check-up.

Sponsors

National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR)
CollaboratorNIH
University of Pittsburgh
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age 50 years or older. * Is community dwelling. * Has osteoarthritis of the knee. * Has hypertension for which monotherapy or combination pharmacological treatment is prescribed. * Able to complete a behavioral run-in consisting of completing questionnaires, using a 7-day electronic-diary, and wearing an ActiGraph accelerometer at the waist for 7 days. * Has written permission to participate from the physician.

Exclusion criteria

* Reports currently doing lower extremity exercise =\> 2 times/week. * Reports currently fitness walking =\> 90 minutes/week. * Incapable of managing their own treatment regimen. * Does not have, or cannot use, a telephone or is unwilling to provide a telephone number. * Has received cortisone or Synvisc injections in the knee, angioplasty, stents, or a pacemaker in the past 6 months. * Reports unstable cardiovascular, pulmonary, or metabolic disease or signs and symptoms suggestive of cardiovascular, pulmonary, or metabolic disease that restrict activity. * Has resting systolic blood pressure =\> 160 mm Hg or diastolic blood pressure =\> 100 mm Hg. * Reports other conditions, such as osteoarthritis of the hip, spinal stenosis, inflammatory arthritis, foot drop, diabetes treated with insulin, or diabetic complications that may affect performance of lower extremity exercise and participation in fitness walking. * Reports current knee conditions, such as meniscus tears and knee ligament ruptures. * Reports major depression that may impact the ability to fully participate in this study. * Is scheduled to undergo a major surgical procedure in the next 13 months. * Is concurrently participating in a drug or psychoeducational trial that may confound, or be confounded by, participation in this study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Systolic Blood Pressure at 25 WeeksAt the end of the 6-month intervention period (week 25)Measured by the OMRON HEM-907XL automatic professional digital blood pressure monitor in mm Hg.
Performance of Lower Extremity Exercise at 25 WeeksAt the end of the 6-month intervention period (week 25)Measured by the electronic-diary in terms of the total volume of lower extremity exercise (i.e., the number of days the participant reports completing a lower extremity exercise session and the total number of lower extremity exercises per day performed \[repetitions x sets\] over a 7-day period).
Participation in Fitness Walking at 25 WeeksAt the end of the 6-month intervention period (week 25)Measured by the ActiGraph accelerometer in terms of mean daily activity minutes of none to very low, light, and moderate-to-vigorous activity counts summarized over a 7-day period.
Objective Functional Status by the 6-minute Walk at 25 WeeksAt the end of the 6-month intervention period (week 25)Measured by the 6-minute walk (yards) as part of the performance-based functional status assessment.
Objective Functional Status by the Short Physical Performance Battery at 25 WeeksAt the end of the 6-month intervention period (week 25)Measured by the Short Physical Performance Battery (total scale score) as part of the performance-based functional status assessment; subscale scores are summed for a total scale score; the scale score range is 0-13; higher scores are better.
Diastolic Blood Pressure at 25 WeeksAt the end of the 6-month intervention period (week 25)Measured by the OMRON HEM-907XL automatic professional digital blood pressure monitor in mm Hg.
Performance of Lower Extremity Exercise at 52 Weeks6 months after the intervention period ends (week 52)Measured by the electronic-diary in terms of the total volume of lower extremity exercise (i.e., the number of days the subject reports completing a lower extremity exercise session and the total number of lower extremity exercises per day performed \[repetitions x sets\] over a 7-day period).
Participation in Fitness Walking at 52 Weeks6 months after the intervention period ends (week 52)Measured by the ActiGraph accelerometer in terms of mean daily activity minutes of none to very low, light, and moderate-to-vigorous activity counts summarized over a 7-day period.
Objective Functional Status by the 6-minute Walk at 52 Weeks6 months after the intervention period ends (week 52)Measured by the 6-minute walk (yards) as part of the performance-based functional status assessment.
Objective Functional Status by the Short Physical Performance Battery at 52 Weeks6 months after the intervention period ends (week 52)Measured by the Short Physical Performance Battery (total scale score) as part of the performance-based functional status assessment; subscale scores are summed for a total scale score; the scale score range is 0-13; higher scores are better.
Systolic Blood Pressure at 52 Weeks6 months after the intervention period ends (week 52)Measured by the OMRON HEM-907XL automatic professional digital blood pressure monitor in mm Hg.
Diastolic Blood Pressure at 52 Weeks6 months after the intervention period ends (week 52)Measured by the OMRON HEM-907XL automatic professional digital blood pressure monitor in mm Hg.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain by the Bodily Pain Subscale of the Short Form-36v2 at 52 Weeks6 months after the intervention period ends (week 52)Measured by the Bodily Pain subscale of the Short Form-36v2; the subscale score range is 0-100; higher scores are better.
Fatigue at 52 Weeks6 months after the intervention period ends (week 52)Measured by the Brief Fatigue Inventory, which assesses fatigue severity; the scale score range is 0-10; lower scores are better.
Health-Related Quality of Life at 52 Weeks6 months after the intervention period ends (week 52)Measured by the Short Form-36v2 in terms of the following: Mental Component: this summary scale is composed of eight subscale scores primarily derived from the mental health, role functioning-emotional, and social functioning scores; the scale score range is 0-100; higher scores are better Physical Component: this summary scale is composed of eight subscale scores primarily derived from the physical functioning, role functioning-physical, and bodily pain scores; the scale score range is 0-100; higher scores are better
Subjective Functional Status at 25 WeeksAt the end of the 6-month intervention period (week 25)Measured by the Physical Function subscale of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Osteoarthritis Index; the subscale score range is 0-68; lower scores are better.
Arthritis Self-Efficacy at 52 Weeks6 months after the intervention period ends (week 52)Measured by the Arthritis Self-Efficacy Scale in terms of the following: Pain subscale: the subscale score range is 10-100; higher scores are better Function subscale: the subscale score range is 10-100; higher scores are better Other Symptoms subscale: the subscale score range is 10-100; higher scores are better
Outcome Expectancy at 52 Weeks6 months after the intervention period ends (week 52)Measured by the Perceived Therapeutic Efficacy Scale in terms of the following: Exercise and Arthritis: the scale score range is 0-100; higher scores are better Exercise and Hypertension: the scale score range is 0-100; higher scores are better
Self-Efficacy at 52 Weeks6 months after the intervention period ends (week 52)Measured by the Self-Efficacy Scale in terms of the following: Exercise Barriers Self-Efficacy subscale: the subscale score range is 0-100; higher scores are better Exercise Self-Efficacy subscale: the subscale score range is 0-100; higher scores are better
Quadriceps Strength at 25 WeeksAt the end of the 6-month intervention period (week 25)Measured by the MicroFET2 hand-held dynamometer in terms of mean maximum pounds over two trials.
Pain by the Pain Subscale of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Osteoarthritis Index at 25 WeeksAt the end of the 6-month intervention period (week 25)Measured by the Pain subscale of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Osteoarthritis Index; the subscale score range is 0-20; lower scores are better.
Pain by the Bodily Pain Subscale of the Short Form-36v2 at 25 WeeksAt the end of the 6-month intervention period (week 25)Measured by the Bodily Pain subscale of the Short Form-36v2; the subscale score range is 0-100; higher scores are better.
Fatigue at 25 WeeksAt the end of the 6-month intervention period (week 25)Measured by the Brief Fatigue Inventory, which assesses fatigue severity; the scale score range is 0-10; lower scores are better.
Health-Related Quality of Life at 25 WeeksAt the end of the 6-month intervention period (week 25)Measured by the Short Form-36v2 in terms of the following: Mental Component: this summary scale is composed of eight subscale scores primarily derived from the mental health, role functioning-emotional, and social functioning scores; the scale score range is 0-100; higher scores are better Physical Component: this summary scale is composed of eight subscale scores primarily derived from the physical functioning, role functioning-physical, and bodily pain scores; the scale score range is 0-100; higher scores are better
Self-Efficacy at 25 WeeksAt the end of the 6-month intervention period (week 25)Measured by the Self-Efficacy Scale in terms of the following: Exercise Barriers Self-Efficacy subscale: the subscale score range is 0-100; higher scores are better Exercise Self-Efficacy subscale: the subscale score range is 0-100; higher scores are better
Arthritis Self-Efficacy at 25 WeeksAt the end of the 6-month intervention period (week 25)Measured by the Arthritis Self-Efficacy Scale in terms of the following: Pain subscale: the subscale score range is 10-100; higher scores are better Function subscale: the subscale score range is 10-100; higher scores are better Other Symptoms subscale: the subscale score range is 10-100; higher scores are better
Outcome Expectancy at 25 WeeksAt the end of the 6-month intervention period (week 25)Measured by the Perceived Therapeutic Efficacy Scale in terms of the following: Exercise and Arthritis: the scale score range is 0-100; higher scores are better Exercise and Hypertension: the scale score range is 0-100; higher scores are better
Subjective Functional Status at 52 Weeks6 months after the intervention period ends (week 52)Measured by the Physical Function subscale of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Osteoarthritis Index; the subscale score range is 0-68; lower scores are better.
Quadriceps Strength at 52 Weeks6 months after the intervention period ends (week 52)Measured by the MicroFET2 hand-held dynamometer in terms of mean maximum pounds over two trials.
Pain by the Pain Subscale of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Osteoarthritis Index at 52 Weeks6 months after the intervention period ends (week 52)Measured by the Pain subscale of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Osteoarthritis Index; the subscale score range is 0-20; lower scores are better.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
STAR Intervention
Staying Active with Arthritis Intervention STAR Intervention: The 24-week modified Staying Active with Arthritis (STAR) intervention, guided by self-efficacy theory and modified to address comorbid hypertension, consists of 6 weekly individual face-to-face exercise sessions by a licensed physical therapist, 9 biweekly telephone counseling sessions by a registered nurse to continue the use of self-efficacy strategies, and lower extremity exercise and fitness walking being carried out at home between sessions. There will be no contact with participants during weeks 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, and 23. During the 6-month follow-up period, the participants will be contacted briefly by telephone by a registered nurse at weeks 30, 36, and 48 for a general check-up.
91
Attention-Control
Senior Health Information Intervention Attention-Control: Attention-Control is a 24-week general health education program for older adults that consists of 6 weekly telephone sessions by a registered nurse followed by 9 biweekly telephone sessions by a registered nurse. There will be no contact with participants during weeks 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, and 23. Topics include cancer screenings; immunizations; osteoporosis; low vision; hearing loss; talking with your primary care provider; eating healthy (two parts); sleep and aging; injury prevention (two parts: balance problems and falls); oral health; foot care; and mental health (depression). During the 6-month follow-up period, the participants will be contacted briefly by telephone by a registered nurse at weeks 30, 36, and 48 for a general check-up.
91
Total182

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up2316

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalSTAR InterventionAttention-Control
6-minute walk485.5 yards
STANDARD_DEVIATION 97.1
486.2 yards
STANDARD_DEVIATION 105.9
484.7 yards
STANDARD_DEVIATION 88.1
8-foot up-and-go6.6 seconds
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.6
6.5 seconds
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.8
6.6 seconds
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.3
Activity minutes over 7 days (ActiGraph): light (counts of 100-2,019/min)2383.8 minutes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 602.2
2348.7 minutes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 572
2418.8 minutes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 632.1
Activity minutes over 7 days (ActiGraph): moderate-to-vigorous (counts of > 2,020/min)320.6 minutes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 234.9
275.8 minutes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 154
365.5 minutes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 288.4
Activity minutes over 7 days (ActiGraph): no to very low (counts of 0-99/min)3045.2 minutes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 786.7
3155.5 minutes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 714.6
2934.8 minutes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 842.3
Age, Continuous64.71 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.1
64.47 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.46
64.96 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.76
Body mass index34.07 kg/m²
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.97
34.50 kg/m²
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.48
33.64 kg/m²
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.43
Brief Fatigue Inventory2.8 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.4
2.8 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.6
2.7 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.2
Chair sit-and-reach-1.1 inches
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.6
-1.4 inches
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.7
-0.8 inches
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.6
Diastolic blood pressure73.01 mm Hg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.33
72.86 mm Hg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.18
73.15 mm Hg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.47
Educational status
> High school
143 participants72 participants71 participants
Educational status
High school or less
39 participants19 participants19 participants
Educational status
Missing
0 participants0 participants1 participants
Employment status
Employed
88 participants45 participants43 participants
Employment status
Not employed
94 participants46 participants48 participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
6 Participants3 Participants3 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
176 Participants88 Participants88 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Fitness walking (e-dairy): days/week0.61 days/week
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.36
0.65 days/week
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.41
0.57 days/week
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.31
Fitness walking (e-diary): average minutes/day2.42 average minutes/day
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.12
2.65 average minutes/day
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.78
2.19 average minutes/day
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.4
Fitness walking (e-diary): minutes/week16.93 minutes/week
STANDARD_DEVIATION 42.82
18.54 minutes/week
STANDARD_DEVIATION 47.45
15.33 minutes/week
STANDARD_DEVIATION 37.83
Household income
$50,000 or more/year
77 participants39 participants38 participants
Household income
< $50,000/year
75 participants37 participants38 participants
Household income
Missing
30 participants15 participants15 participants
Lower extremity exercise (e-diary): average minutes/day1.07 average minutes/day
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.5
1.09 average minutes/day
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.55
1.06 average minutes/day
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.47
Lower extremity exercise (e-diary): days/week0.38 days/week
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.01
0.41 days/week
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.01
0.36 days/week
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.02
Lower extremity exercise (e-diary): minutes/week7.52 minutes/week
STANDARD_DEVIATION 24.52
7.60 minutes/week
STANDARD_DEVIATION 24.87
7.43 minutes/week
STANDARD_DEVIATION 24.51
Lower extremity exercise (e-diary): volume [repetitions x sets over 7-day period]/week43.67 repetitions x sets/week
STANDARD_DEVIATION 199.79
56.93 repetitions x sets/week
STANDARD_DEVIATION 255.39
30.41 repetitions x sets/week
STANDARD_DEVIATION 121.21
Marital status
Married
84 participants38 participants46 participants
Marital status
Not married
98 participants53 participants45 participants
Mean duration of bouts over 7 days (ActiGraph): bouts of moderate-to-vigorous activity n=9618.6 minutes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.2
17.2 minutes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.5
19.9 minutes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.7
Mean number of daily activity minutes (ActiGraph): light (counts of 100-2,019/min)333.4 minutes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 81.7
327.5 minutes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 76.8
339.3 minutes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 86.4
Mean number of daily activity minutes (ActiGraph): moderate-to-vigorous (counts of >2,020/min)44.7 minutes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 31.6
38.3 minutes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.7
51.2 minutes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 38.7
Mean number of daily activity minutes (ActiGraph): no to very low (counts of 0-99/min)425.2 minutes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 104.9
440.14 minutes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 96.5
410.26 minutes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 111.1
Mean number of daily bouts (ActiGraph): bouts of moderate-to-vigorous activity0.3 bouts
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.7
0.2 bouts
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.4
0.4 bouts
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.9
Number of bouts over 7 days (ActiGraph): bouts of moderate-to-vigorous activity2.2 bouts
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5
1.7 bouts
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.6
2.7 bouts
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.5
Number of comorbidities6.6 comorbidities
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.8
6.8 comorbidities
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.9
6.5 comorbidities
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.7
Perceived Therapeutic Efficacy - Exercise & Arthritis70.0 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 23.1
67.8 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 24.5
72.1 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 21.7
Perceived Therapeutic Efficacy - Exercise & Hypertension74.5 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 22.3
74.2 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 21.2
74.7 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 23.4
Quadriceps strength (mean maximum for right and left quadriceps)42.4 pounds
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.8
41.8 pounds
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.5
43.0 pounds
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.1
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
3 Participants2 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
32 Participants17 Participants15 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
14 Participants5 Participants9 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
132 Participants66 Participants66 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
182 participants91 participants91 participants
Self-efficacy: Arthritis Function84.2 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.6
83.1 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.5
85.2 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.6
Self-efficacy: Arthritis Other Symptoms77.3 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.2
76.8 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.4
77.8 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.2
Self-efficacy: Arthritis Pain74.1 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.6
73.7 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17
74.4 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.2
Self-efficacy: Exercise73.6 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 27.5
72.8 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 28
74.4 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 27.2
Self-efficacy: Exercise Barriers64.3 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 23.9
60.3 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 25.6
68.3 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 21.4
Sex: Female, Male
Female
133 Participants67 Participants66 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
49 Participants24 Participants25 Participants
Short Form-36v2 Health Survey: Bodily Pain56.2 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.5
55.7 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.3
56.8 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.7
Short Form-36v2 Health Survey: Mental Component Score53.7 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.6
53.4 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.8
54.0 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.4
Short Form-36v2 Health Survey: Physical Component Score42.4 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.7
42.0 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.8
42.8 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.6
Short Form-36v2 Health Survey: Physical Functioning63.6 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 21.6
62.0 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 23.4
65.2 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.7
Short Physical Performance Battery: 4-meter usual walk4.0 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.2
4.0 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.2
4.0 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0
Short Physical Performance Battery: repeated chair stands2.8 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.1
2.9 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.2
2.7 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.1
Short Physical Performance Battery: standing balance4.1 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.8
4.2 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.8
4.0 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.9
Short Physical Performance Battery: total10.8 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.6
11.0 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.7
10.6 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.6
Systolic blood pressure121.96 mm Hg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.37
122.09 mm Hg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.01
121.82 mm Hg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.78
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index: Function20.9 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.8
22.5 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.4
19.3 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.9
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index: Pain5.3 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.5
5.8 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.9
4.8 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index: Stiffness2.9 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.8
3.1 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.8
2.7 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.8

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 910 / 91
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 910 / 91

Outcome results

Primary

Diastolic Blood Pressure at 25 Weeks

Measured by the OMRON HEM-907XL automatic professional digital blood pressure monitor in mm Hg.

Time frame: At the end of the 6-month intervention period (week 25)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
STAR InterventionDiastolic Blood Pressure at 25 Weeks71.74 mm HgStandard Error 1.2
Attention-ControlDiastolic Blood Pressure at 25 Weeks73.10 mm HgStandard Error 1.16
p-value: 0.416Mixed Models Analysis
Primary

Diastolic Blood Pressure at 52 Weeks

Measured by the OMRON HEM-907XL automatic professional digital blood pressure monitor in mm Hg.

Time frame: 6 months after the intervention period ends (week 52)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
STAR InterventionDiastolic Blood Pressure at 52 Weeks72.62 mm HgStandard Error 1.22
Attention-ControlDiastolic Blood Pressure at 52 Weeks74.06 mm HgStandard Error 1.18
p-value: 0.396Mixed Models Analysis
Primary

Objective Functional Status by the 6-minute Walk at 25 Weeks

Measured by the 6-minute walk (yards) as part of the performance-based functional status assessment.

Time frame: At the end of the 6-month intervention period (week 25)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
STAR InterventionObjective Functional Status by the 6-minute Walk at 25 Weeks465.46 yardsStandard Error 18.82
Attention-ControlObjective Functional Status by the 6-minute Walk at 25 Weeks483.02 yardsStandard Error 14.47
p-value: 0.461Mixed Models Analysis
Primary

Objective Functional Status by the 6-minute Walk at 52 Weeks

Measured by the 6-minute walk (yards) as part of the performance-based functional status assessment.

Time frame: 6 months after the intervention period ends (week 52)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
STAR InterventionObjective Functional Status by the 6-minute Walk at 52 Weeks480.29 yardsStandard Error 16.89
Attention-ControlObjective Functional Status by the 6-minute Walk at 52 Weeks465.36 yardsStandard Error 19.26
p-value: 0.561Mixed Models Analysis
Primary

Objective Functional Status by the Short Physical Performance Battery at 25 Weeks

Measured by the Short Physical Performance Battery (total scale score) as part of the performance-based functional status assessment; subscale scores are summed for a total scale score; the scale score range is 0-13; higher scores are better.

Time frame: At the end of the 6-month intervention period (week 25)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
STAR InterventionObjective Functional Status by the Short Physical Performance Battery at 25 Weeks11.29 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.22
Attention-ControlObjective Functional Status by the Short Physical Performance Battery at 25 Weeks10.86 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.23
p-value: 0.18Mixed Models Analysis
Primary

Objective Functional Status by the Short Physical Performance Battery at 52 Weeks

Measured by the Short Physical Performance Battery (total scale score) as part of the performance-based functional status assessment; subscale scores are summed for a total scale score; the scale score range is 0-13; higher scores are better.

Time frame: 6 months after the intervention period ends (week 52)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
STAR InterventionObjective Functional Status by the Short Physical Performance Battery at 52 Weeks11.20 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.24
Attention-ControlObjective Functional Status by the Short Physical Performance Battery at 52 Weeks11.25 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.19
p-value: 0.856Mixed Models Analysis
Primary

Participation in Fitness Walking at 25 Weeks

Measured by the ActiGraph accelerometer in terms of mean daily activity minutes of none to very low, light, and moderate-to-vigorous activity counts summarized over a 7-day period.

Time frame: At the end of the 6-month intervention period (week 25)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
STAR InterventionParticipation in Fitness Walking at 25 WeeksNone to very low434.89 minutesStandard Error 11.69
STAR InterventionParticipation in Fitness Walking at 25 WeeksLight314.07 minutesStandard Error 9.29
STAR InterventionParticipation in Fitness Walking at 25 WeeksModerate-to-vigorous40.53 minutesStandard Error 2.68
Attention-ControlParticipation in Fitness Walking at 25 WeeksNone to very low409.98 minutesStandard Error 11.54
Attention-ControlParticipation in Fitness Walking at 25 WeeksLight321.44 minutesStandard Error 9.18
Attention-ControlParticipation in Fitness Walking at 25 WeeksModerate-to-vigorous46.69 minutesStandard Error 3.93
p-value: 0.13Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.573Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.197Mixed Models Analysis
Primary

Participation in Fitness Walking at 52 Weeks

Measured by the ActiGraph accelerometer in terms of mean daily activity minutes of none to very low, light, and moderate-to-vigorous activity counts summarized over a 7-day period.

Time frame: 6 months after the intervention period ends (week 52)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
STAR InterventionParticipation in Fitness Walking at 52 WeeksNone to very low426.71 minutesStandard Error 11.97
STAR InterventionParticipation in Fitness Walking at 52 WeeksLight318.04 minutesStandard Error 9.5
STAR InterventionParticipation in Fitness Walking at 52 WeeksModerate-to-vigorous39.37 minutesStandard Error 2.74
Attention-ControlParticipation in Fitness Walking at 52 WeeksNone to very low408.30 minutesStandard Error 11.7
Attention-ControlParticipation in Fitness Walking at 52 WeeksLight321.01 minutesStandard Error 9.3
Attention-ControlParticipation in Fitness Walking at 52 WeeksModerate-to-vigorous47.97 minutesStandard Error 3.97
p-value: 0.272Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.823Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.076Mixed Models Analysis
Primary

Performance of Lower Extremity Exercise at 25 Weeks

Measured by the electronic-diary in terms of the total volume of lower extremity exercise (i.e., the number of days the participant reports completing a lower extremity exercise session and the total number of lower extremity exercises per day performed \[repetitions x sets\] over a 7-day period).

Time frame: At the end of the 6-month intervention period (week 25)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
STAR InterventionPerformance of Lower Extremity Exercise at 25 Weeks46.84 repetitions x sets/weekStandard Error 4.59
Attention-ControlPerformance of Lower Extremity Exercise at 25 Weeks1.90 repetitions x sets/weekStandard Error 0.86
p-value: <0.0001Mixed Models Analysis
Primary

Performance of Lower Extremity Exercise at 52 Weeks

Measured by the electronic-diary in terms of the total volume of lower extremity exercise (i.e., the number of days the subject reports completing a lower extremity exercise session and the total number of lower extremity exercises per day performed \[repetitions x sets\] over a 7-day period).

Time frame: 6 months after the intervention period ends (week 52)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
STAR InterventionPerformance of Lower Extremity Exercise at 52 Weeks42.06 repetitions x sets/weekStandard Error 6.74
Attention-ControlPerformance of Lower Extremity Exercise at 52 Weeks3.14 repetitions x sets/weekStandard Error 1.22
p-value: <0.0001Mixed Models Analysis
Primary

Systolic Blood Pressure at 25 Weeks

Measured by the OMRON HEM-907XL automatic professional digital blood pressure monitor in mm Hg.

Time frame: At the end of the 6-month intervention period (week 25)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
STAR InterventionSystolic Blood Pressure at 25 Weeks120.33 mm HgStandard Error 1.74
Attention-ControlSystolic Blood Pressure at 25 Weeks123.07 mm HgStandard Error 1.68
p-value: 0.258Mixed Models Analysis
Primary

Systolic Blood Pressure at 52 Weeks

Measured by the OMRON HEM-907XL automatic professional digital blood pressure monitor in mm Hg.

Time frame: 6 months after the intervention period ends (week 52)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
STAR InterventionSystolic Blood Pressure at 52 Weeks122.54 mm HgStandard Error 1.78
Attention-ControlSystolic Blood Pressure at 52 Weeks125.14 mm HgStandard Error 1.71
p-value: 0.292Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Arthritis Self-Efficacy at 25 Weeks

Measured by the Arthritis Self-Efficacy Scale in terms of the following: Pain subscale: the subscale score range is 10-100; higher scores are better Function subscale: the subscale score range is 10-100; higher scores are better Other Symptoms subscale: the subscale score range is 10-100; higher scores are better

Time frame: At the end of the 6-month intervention period (week 25)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
STAR InterventionArthritis Self-Efficacy at 25 WeeksArthritis Self Efficacy Pain75.58 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.97
STAR InterventionArthritis Self-Efficacy at 25 WeeksArthritis Self-Efficacy Function85.74 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.79
STAR InterventionArthritis Self-Efficacy at 25 WeeksArthritis Self-Efficacy Other Symptoms78.88 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.99
Attention-ControlArthritis Self-Efficacy at 25 WeeksArthritis Self Efficacy Pain67.38 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.13
Attention-ControlArthritis Self-Efficacy at 25 WeeksArthritis Self-Efficacy Function85.90 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.67
Attention-ControlArthritis Self-Efficacy at 25 WeeksArthritis Self-Efficacy Other Symptoms77.66 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.95
p-value: 0.005Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.948Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.663Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Arthritis Self-Efficacy at 52 Weeks

Measured by the Arthritis Self-Efficacy Scale in terms of the following: Pain subscale: the subscale score range is 10-100; higher scores are better Function subscale: the subscale score range is 10-100; higher scores are better Other Symptoms subscale: the subscale score range is 10-100; higher scores are better

Time frame: 6 months after the intervention period ends (week 52)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
STAR InterventionArthritis Self-Efficacy at 52 WeeksArthritis Self-Efficacy Pain73.15 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.06
STAR InterventionArthritis Self-Efficacy at 52 WeeksArthritis Self-Efficacy Function85.38 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.82
STAR InterventionArthritis Self-Efficacy at 52 WeeksArthritis Self-Efficacy Other Symptoms75.92 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.03
Attention-ControlArthritis Self-Efficacy at 52 WeeksArthritis Self-Efficacy Pain69.44 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.19
Attention-ControlArthritis Self-Efficacy at 52 WeeksArthritis Self-Efficacy Function87.75 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.69
Attention-ControlArthritis Self-Efficacy at 52 WeeksArthritis Self-Efficacy Other Symptoms75.23 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.96
p-value: 0.219Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.34Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.806Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Fatigue at 25 Weeks

Measured by the Brief Fatigue Inventory, which assesses fatigue severity; the scale score range is 0-10; lower scores are better.

Time frame: At the end of the 6-month intervention period (week 25)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
STAR InterventionFatigue at 25 Weeks2.49 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.27
Attention-ControlFatigue at 25 Weeks2.76 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.25
p-value: 0.466Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Fatigue at 52 Weeks

Measured by the Brief Fatigue Inventory, which assesses fatigue severity; the scale score range is 0-10; lower scores are better.

Time frame: 6 months after the intervention period ends (week 52)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
STAR InterventionFatigue at 52 Weeks2.97 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.28
Attention-ControlFatigue at 52 Weeks2.94 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.25
p-value: 0.947Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Health-Related Quality of Life at 25 Weeks

Measured by the Short Form-36v2 in terms of the following: Mental Component: this summary scale is composed of eight subscale scores primarily derived from the mental health, role functioning-emotional, and social functioning scores; the scale score range is 0-100; higher scores are better Physical Component: this summary scale is composed of eight subscale scores primarily derived from the physical functioning, role functioning-physical, and bodily pain scores; the scale score range is 0-100; higher scores are better

Time frame: At the end of the 6-month intervention period (week 25)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
STAR InterventionHealth-Related Quality of Life at 25 WeeksShort Form-36v2 Mental Component53.92 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.11
STAR InterventionHealth-Related Quality of Life at 25 WeeksShort Form-36v2 Physical Component43.10 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.97
Attention-ControlHealth-Related Quality of Life at 25 WeeksShort Form-36v2 Mental Component52.30 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.2
Attention-ControlHealth-Related Quality of Life at 25 WeeksShort Form-36v2 Physical Component43.07 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.95
p-value: 0.322Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.979Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Health-Related Quality of Life at 52 Weeks

Measured by the Short Form-36v2 in terms of the following: Mental Component: this summary scale is composed of eight subscale scores primarily derived from the mental health, role functioning-emotional, and social functioning scores; the scale score range is 0-100; higher scores are better Physical Component: this summary scale is composed of eight subscale scores primarily derived from the physical functioning, role functioning-physical, and bodily pain scores; the scale score range is 0-100; higher scores are better

Time frame: 6 months after the intervention period ends (week 52)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
STAR InterventionHealth-Related Quality of Life at 52 WeeksShort Form-36v2 Mental Component53.18 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.12
STAR InterventionHealth-Related Quality of Life at 52 WeeksShort Form-36v2 Physical Component42.10 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.18
Attention-ControlHealth-Related Quality of Life at 52 WeeksShort Form-36v2 Mental Component51.81 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.21
Attention-ControlHealth-Related Quality of Life at 52 WeeksShort Form-36v2 Physical Component42.47 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.15
p-value: 0.406Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.826Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Outcome Expectancy at 25 Weeks

Measured by the Perceived Therapeutic Efficacy Scale in terms of the following: Exercise and Arthritis: the scale score range is 0-100; higher scores are better Exercise and Hypertension: the scale score range is 0-100; higher scores are better

Time frame: At the end of the 6-month intervention period (week 25)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
STAR InterventionOutcome Expectancy at 25 WeeksPerceived Therapeutic Efficacy Arthritis72.79 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.41
STAR InterventionOutcome Expectancy at 25 WeeksPerceived Therapeutic Efficacy Hypertension77.14 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.48
Attention-ControlOutcome Expectancy at 25 WeeksPerceived Therapeutic Efficacy Arthritis59.67 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.91
Attention-ControlOutcome Expectancy at 25 WeeksPerceived Therapeutic Efficacy Hypertension69.62 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.42
p-value: 0.001Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.031Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Outcome Expectancy at 52 Weeks

Measured by the Perceived Therapeutic Efficacy Scale in terms of the following: Exercise and Arthritis: the scale score range is 0-100; higher scores are better Exercise and Hypertension: the scale score range is 0-100; higher scores are better

Time frame: 6 months after the intervention period ends (week 52)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
STAR InterventionOutcome Expectancy at 52 WeeksPerceived Therapeutic Efficacy Hypertension73.40 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.53
STAR InterventionOutcome Expectancy at 52 WeeksPerceived Therapeutic Efficacy Arthritis67.09 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.83
Attention-ControlOutcome Expectancy at 52 WeeksPerceived Therapeutic Efficacy Arthritis55.86 units on a scaleStandard Error 3.07
Attention-ControlOutcome Expectancy at 52 WeeksPerceived Therapeutic Efficacy Hypertension67.93 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.44
p-value: 0.008Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.12t-test, 1 sided
Secondary

Pain by the Bodily Pain Subscale of the Short Form-36v2 at 25 Weeks

Measured by the Bodily Pain subscale of the Short Form-36v2; the subscale score range is 0-100; higher scores are better.

Time frame: At the end of the 6-month intervention period (week 25)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
STAR InterventionPain by the Bodily Pain Subscale of the Short Form-36v2 at 25 Weeks59.65 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.32
Attention-ControlPain by the Bodily Pain Subscale of the Short Form-36v2 at 25 Weeks58.13 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.26
p-value: 0.639Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Pain by the Bodily Pain Subscale of the Short Form-36v2 at 52 Weeks

Measured by the Bodily Pain subscale of the Short Form-36v2; the subscale score range is 0-100; higher scores are better.

Time frame: 6 months after the intervention period ends (week 52)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
STAR InterventionPain by the Bodily Pain Subscale of the Short Form-36v2 at 52 Weeks59.73 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.36
Attention-ControlPain by the Bodily Pain Subscale of the Short Form-36v2 at 52 Weeks59.70 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.28
p-value: 0.993Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Pain by the Pain Subscale of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Osteoarthritis Index at 25 Weeks

Measured by the Pain subscale of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Osteoarthritis Index; the subscale score range is 0-20; lower scores are better.

Time frame: At the end of the 6-month intervention period (week 25)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
STAR InterventionPain by the Pain Subscale of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Osteoarthritis Index at 25 Weeks4.25 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.39
Attention-ControlPain by the Pain Subscale of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Osteoarthritis Index at 25 Weeks4.54 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.38
p-value: 0.596Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Pain by the Pain Subscale of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Osteoarthritis Index at 52 Weeks

Measured by the Pain subscale of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Osteoarthritis Index; the subscale score range is 0-20; lower scores are better.

Time frame: 6 months after the intervention period ends (week 52)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
STAR InterventionPain by the Pain Subscale of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Osteoarthritis Index at 52 Weeks4.09 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.41
Attention-ControlPain by the Pain Subscale of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Osteoarthritis Index at 52 Weeks4.72 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.39
p-value: 0.26Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Quadriceps Strength at 25 Weeks

Measured by the MicroFET2 hand-held dynamometer in terms of mean maximum pounds over two trials.

Time frame: At the end of the 6-month intervention period (week 25)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
STAR InterventionQuadriceps Strength at 25 Weeks43.21 poundsStandard Error 1.75
Attention-ControlQuadriceps Strength at 25 Weeks41.88 poundsStandard Error 1.71
p-value: 0.586Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Quadriceps Strength at 52 Weeks

Measured by the MicroFET2 hand-held dynamometer in terms of mean maximum pounds over two trials.

Time frame: 6 months after the intervention period ends (week 52)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
STAR InterventionQuadriceps Strength at 52 Weeks43.66 poundsStandard Error 1.77
Attention-ControlQuadriceps Strength at 52 Weeks43.33 poundsStandard Error 1.73
p-value: 0.895Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Self-Efficacy at 25 Weeks

Measured by the Self-Efficacy Scale in terms of the following: Exercise Barriers Self-Efficacy subscale: the subscale score range is 0-100; higher scores are better Exercise Self-Efficacy subscale: the subscale score range is 0-100; higher scores are better

Time frame: At the end of the 6-month intervention period (week 25)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
STAR InterventionSelf-Efficacy at 25 WeeksExercise Barriers Self-Efficacy59.81 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.77
STAR InterventionSelf-Efficacy at 25 WeeksExercise Self-Efficacy67.43 units on a scaleStandard Error 3.44
Attention-ControlSelf-Efficacy at 25 WeeksExercise Barriers Self-Efficacy58.37 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.69
Attention-ControlSelf-Efficacy at 25 WeeksExercise Self-Efficacy60.20 units on a scaleStandard Error 3.35
p-value: 0.71Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.133Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Self-Efficacy at 52 Weeks

Measured by the Self-Efficacy Scale in terms of the following: Exercise Barriers Self-Efficacy subscale: the subscale score range is 0-100; higher scores are better Exercise Self-Efficacy subscale: the subscale score range is 0-100; higher scores are better

Time frame: 6 months after the intervention period ends (week 52)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
STAR InterventionSelf-Efficacy at 52 WeeksExercise Barriers Self-Efficacy53.30 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.83
STAR InterventionSelf-Efficacy at 52 WeeksExercise Self-Efficacy55.49 units on a scaleStandard Error 3.56
Attention-ControlSelf-Efficacy at 52 WeeksExercise Barriers Self-Efficacy53.05 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.73
Attention-ControlSelf-Efficacy at 52 WeeksExercise Self-Efficacy51.00 units on a scaleStandard Error 3.43
p-value: 0.95Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.365Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Subjective Functional Status at 25 Weeks

Measured by the Physical Function subscale of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Osteoarthritis Index; the subscale score range is 0-68; lower scores are better.

Time frame: At the end of the 6-month intervention period (week 25)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
STAR InterventionSubjective Functional Status at 25 Weeks16.68 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.44
Attention-ControlSubjective Functional Status at 25 Weeks18.30 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.42
p-value: 0.424Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Subjective Functional Status at 52 Weeks

Measured by the Physical Function subscale of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Osteoarthritis Index; the subscale score range is 0-68; lower scores are better.

Time frame: 6 months after the intervention period ends (week 52)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
STAR InterventionSubjective Functional Status at 52 Weeks17.02 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.49
Attention-ControlSubjective Functional Status at 52 Weeks17.51 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.44
p-value: 0.816Mixed Models Analysis

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026