Skip to content

A Study Comparing Two Fluticasone Furoate Nasal Sprays in the Relief of the Signs and Symptoms of Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis

A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo Controlled, Parallel Group, Multi-Site Study to Compare the Clinical Equivalence of Fluticasone Furoate Nasal Spray (Lek Pharmaceuticals) With Veramyst® Nasal Spray (GlaxoSmithKline) in the Relief of the Signs and Symptoms of Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01279057
Enrollment
727
Registered
2011-01-19
Start date
2010-12-27
Completion date
2011-02-08
Last updated
2021-02-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal

Keywords

Rhinitis, Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis, Fluticasone furoate, Equivalence, Hay fever

Brief summary

This study compared the safety and efficacy of a generic fluticasone furoate (Lek Pharmaceuticals) nasal spray to the reference listed drug in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis. Additionally both the test and the reference formulations were tested for superiority against a placebo nasal spray.

Detailed description

The study was designed as a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel group, multi-site to compare the clinical equivalence of the test formulation of fluticasone furoate, 27.5 mcg/actuation nasal spray (Lek Pharmaceuticals d.d.) with the reference formulation Veramyst® nasal spray (GlaxoSmithKline) in the relief of the signs and symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis. Participants who met the inclusion/exclusion criteria entered a 7-day placebo lead-in period. Following this placebo lead-in period, on Day 1 participants who continued to meet eligibility criteria were randomly assigned in a 2:2:1 ratio to one of three treatment groups (Test Product:Reference Product:Placebo) for 14 days of treatment. In all treatment groups, participants were instructed to administer the study drug once daily at approximately the same time each day. A single dose of 110 mcg was 4 actuations, each containing 27.5 mcg per actuation. Patients were instructed to administer the 4 actuations alternating between right and left nostril, such that 2 actuations were not administered back to back to the same nostril.

Interventions

DRUGFluticasone furoate 27.5 mcg/actuation nasal spray (Lek Pharmaceuticals)

Nasal spray administered once daily at a dose of 110 mcg (4 actuations) for 14 days.

DRUGFluticasone furoate (Veramyst®) 27.5 mcg/actuation nasal spray

Nasal spray administered once daily at a dose of 110 mcg (4 actuations) for 14 days.

DRUGPlacebo

Placebo nasal spray administered once daily (4 actuations) for 14 days.

Sponsors

Sandoz
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
12 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Male or non-pregnant, non-lactating female 12 years of age or older with a minimum of 2 years of previous history of seasonal allergic rhinitis to the pollen/allergen in season at the time the study is being conducted. * Signed informed consent (assent) form. * Documented positive allergic skin test to local pollen. * An average score of at least 6 on the reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS) with a minimum score of at least 2 for nasal congestion and at least 4 on the reflective Total Ocular Symptom Score (rTOSS).

Exclusion criteria

* History of asthma that required chronic therapy (with the exception of occasional acute or mild exercise induced asthma). * Some other past and concomitant medical conditions, prohibited medications. * Upper respiratory tract infection or any untreated infections. * Patient has started immunotherapy/changed the dose. * Any known allergy to any of the components of the study nasal spray.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
PRIMARY: Mean Change From Baseline in Reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS) (Equivalence: Per-Protocol Population)Baseline, 14 daysPatients were required to record a 12 hour reflective score twice a day approximately 12 hours apart. For the rTNSS patients were asked to look back or reflect on their severity of nasal symptoms over the previous 12 hours. The first rating on each day was taken prior to dosing. Patients were asked to score 4 nasal symptoms (nasal congestion, runny nose, sneezing and itchy nose) on a 4 point scale ranging from 0 (no symptom) to 3 (severe symptom). The means of the 4 individual symptom scores obtained over the randomized treatment period were summed to give the mean rTNSS, which ranged from 0 to 12 with a lower score indicating less severe symptoms. Mean baseline rTNSS was calculated by summing the means of the 4 individual symptom scores obtained over the 72 hours before the randomized treatment period. Mean change from baseline was calculated as mean baseline rTNSS - mean post-randomization rTNSS. A positive change from baseline in rTNSS is considered a favorable outcome.
PRIMARY: Mean Change From Baseline in Reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS) (Superiority: Intent-to-Treat Population)Baseline, 14 daysPatients were required to record a 12 hour reflective score twice a day approximately 12 hours apart. For the rTNSS patients were asked to look back or reflect on their severity of nasal symptoms over the previous 12 hours. The first rating on each day was taken prior to dosing. Patients were asked to score 4 nasal symptoms (nasal congestion, runny nose, sneezing and itchy nose) on a 4 point scale ranging from 0 (no symptom) to 3 (severe symptom). The means of the 4 individual symptom scores obtained over the randomized treatment period were summed to give the mean rTNSS, which ranged from 0 to 12 with a lower score indicating less severe symptoms. Mean baseline rTNSS was calculated by summing the means of the 4 individual symptom scores obtained over the 72 hours before the randomized treatment period. Mean change from baseline was calculated as mean baseline rTNSS - mean post-randomization rTNSS. A positive change from baseline in rTNSS is considered a favorable outcome.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Change From Baseline in Reflective Total Ocular Symptom Score (rTOSS) (Equivalence: Per-Protocol Population)Baseline, 14 daysPatients were required to record a 12 hour reflective score twice a day approximately 12 hours apart. For the rTOSS patients were asked to look back or reflect on their severity of ocular symptoms over the previous 12 hours. The first rating on each day was taken prior to dosing. Patients were asked to score 3 ocular symptoms (eye redness, itching/burning eyes, and tearing/watering eyes) on a 4 point scale ranging from 0 (no symptom) to 3 (severe symptom). The means of the 3 individual symptom scores obtained over the randomized treatment period were summed to give the mean rTOSS, which ranged from 0 to 9 with a lower score indicating less severe symptoms. Mean baseline rTOSS was calculated by summing the means of the 3 individual symptom scores obtained over the 72 hours before the randomized treatment period. Mean change from baseline was calculated as mean baseline rTOSS - mean post-randomization rTOSS. A positive change from baseline is considered a favorable outcome.
Mean Change From Baseline in Reflective Total Ocular Symptom Score (rTOSS) (Superiority: Intent-to-Treat Population)Baseline, 14 daysPatients were required to record a 12 hour reflective score twice a day approximately 12 hours apart. For the rTOSS patients were asked to look back or reflect on their severity of ocular symptoms over the previous 12 hours. The first rating on each day was taken prior to dosing. Patients were asked to score 3 ocular symptoms (eye redness, itching/burning eyes, and tearing/watering eyes) on a 4 point scale ranging from 0 (no symptom) to 3 (severe symptom). The means of the 3 individual symptom scores obtained over the randomized treatment period were summed to give the mean rTOSS, which ranged from 0 to 9 with a lower score indicating less severe symptoms. Mean baseline rTOSS was calculated by summing the means of the 3 individual symptom scores obtained over the 72 hours before the randomized treatment period. Mean change from baseline was calculated as mean baseline rTOSS - mean post-randomization rTOSS. A positive change from baseline is considered a favorable outcome.
Mean Change From Baseline in Instantaneous Total Nasal Symptom Score (iTNSS) (Equivalence: Per-Protocol Population)Baseline, 14 daysParticipants were required to record an instantaneous score twice a day approximately 12 hours apart. For the iTNSS participants were asked to evaluate how I feel now regarding their severity of nasal symptoms. The first rating on each day was taken prior to dosing. Participants were asked to score 4 nasal symptoms (nasal congestion, runny nose, sneezing and itchy nose) on a 4 point scale ranging from 0 (no symptom) to 3 (severe symptom). The means of the 4 individual symptom scores obtained over the randomized treatment period were summed to give the mean iTNSS, which ranged from 0 to 12 with a lower score indicating less severe symptoms. Mean baseline iTNSS was calculated by summing the means of the 4 individual symptom scores obtained over the 72 hours before the randomized treatment period. Mean change from baseline was calculated as mean baseline iTNSS - mean post-randomization iTNSS. A positive change from baseline in iTNSS is considered a favorable outcome.
Mean Change From Baseline in Instantaneous Total Ocular Symptom Score (iTOSS) (Superiority: Intent-to-Treat Population)Baseline, 14 daysPatients were required to record an instantaneous score twice a day approximately 12 hours apart. For the iTOSS patients were asked to evaluate how I feel now regarding their severity of ocular symptoms. The first rating on each day was taken prior to dosing. Patients were asked to score 3 ocular symptoms (eye redness, itching/burning eyes, and tearing/watering eyes) on a 4 point scale ranging from 0 (no symptom) to 3 (severe symptom). The means of the 3 individual symptom scores obtained over the randomized treatment period were summed to give the mean rTOSS, which ranged from 0 to 9 with a lower score indicating less severe symptoms. Mean baseline rTOSS was calculated by summing the means of the 3 individual symptom scores obtained over the 72 hours before the randomized treatment period. Mean change from baseline was calculated as mean baseline iTOSS - mean post-randomization iTOSS. A positive change from baseline in iTOSS is considered a favorable outcome.
Mean Change From Baseline in Instantaneous Total Ocular Symptom Score (iTOSS) (Equivalence: Per-Protocol Population)Baseline, 14 daysPatients were required to record an instantaneous score twice a day approximately 12 hours apart. For the iTOSS patients were asked to evaluate how I feel now regarding their severity of ocular symptoms. The first rating on each day was taken prior to dosing. Patients were asked to score 3 ocular symptoms (eye redness, itching/burning eyes, and tearing/watering eyes) on a 4 point scale ranging from 0 (no symptom) to 3 (severe symptom). The means of the 3 individual symptom scores obtained over the randomized treatment period were summed to give the mean rTOSS, which ranged from 0 to 9 with a lower score indicating less severe symptoms. Mean baseline rTOSS was calculated by summing the means of the 3 individual symptom scores obtained over the 72 hours before the randomized treatment period. Mean change from baseline was calculated as mean baseline iTOSS - mean post-randomization iTOSS. A positive change from baseline in iTOSS is considered a favorable outcome.
Mean Change From Baseline in Instantaneous Total Nasal Symptom Score (iTNSS) (Superiority: Intent-to-Treat Population)Baseline, 14 daysParticipants were required to record an instantaneous score twice a day approximately 12 hours apart. For the iTNSS participants were asked to evaluate how I feel now regarding their severity of nasal symptoms. The first rating on each day was taken prior to dosing. Participants were asked to score 4 nasal symptoms (nasal congestion, runny nose, sneezing and itchy nose) on a 4 point scale ranging from 0 (no symptom) to 3 (severe symptom). The means of the 4 individual symptom scores obtained over the randomized treatment period were summed to give the mean iTNSS, which ranged from 0 to 12 with a lower score indicating less severe symptoms. Mean baseline iTNSS was calculated by summing the means of the 4 individual symptom scores obtained over the 72 hours before the randomized treatment period. Mean change from baseline was calculated as mean baseline iTNSS - mean post-randomization iTNSS. A positive change from baseline in iTNSS is considered a favorable outcome.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants took part in 10 investigative sites in 1 country.

Pre-assignment details

Participants who met the inclusion/exclusion criteria entered a 7-day placebo lead-in period. Following this placebo lead-in period, on Day 1 participants who continued to meet eligibility criteria were randomly assigned in a 2:2:1 ratio to one of three treatment groups (Test Product:Reference Product:Placebo).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Test
Fluticasone furoate 27.5 mcg/actuation nasal spray (Lek Pharmaceuticals) administered once daily at a dose of 110 mcg (4 actuations) for 14 days.
288
Reference
Fluticasone furoate (Veramyst®) 27.5 mcg/actuation nasal spray administered once daily at a dose of 110 mcg (4 actuations) for 14 days.
292
Placebo
Placebo nasal spray administered once daily for 14 days.
147
Total727

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyAdverse Event101
Overall StudyInsufficient therapeutic response001
Overall StudyOther330
Overall StudyPregnancy010
Overall StudyRestricted medication for seasonal allergic rhinitis010
Overall StudyWithdrew consent201

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTestReferencePlaceboTotal
Age, Customized
< 18
17 Participants28 Participants17 Participants62 Participants
Age, Customized
18 - 40
133 Participants122 Participants65 Participants320 Participants
Age, Customized
41 - 64
122 Participants137 Participants59 Participants318 Participants
Age, Customized
65 - 75
15 Participants4 Participants6 Participants25 Participants
Age, Customized
> 75
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian / Alaska Native
2 Participants0 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
2 Participants5 Participants2 Participants9 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black/African American
50 Participants40 Participants19 Participants109 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian / Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
1 Participants4 Participants0 Participants5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
233 Participants241 Participants126 Participants600 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
174 Participants195 Participants91 Participants460 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
114 Participants97 Participants56 Participants267 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 2880 / 2920 / 147
other
Total, other adverse events
6 / 2884 / 2924 / 147
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 2880 / 2921 / 147

Outcome results

Primary

PRIMARY: Mean Change From Baseline in Reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS) (Equivalence: Per-Protocol Population)

Patients were required to record a 12 hour reflective score twice a day approximately 12 hours apart. For the rTNSS patients were asked to look back or reflect on their severity of nasal symptoms over the previous 12 hours. The first rating on each day was taken prior to dosing. Patients were asked to score 4 nasal symptoms (nasal congestion, runny nose, sneezing and itchy nose) on a 4 point scale ranging from 0 (no symptom) to 3 (severe symptom). The means of the 4 individual symptom scores obtained over the randomized treatment period were summed to give the mean rTNSS, which ranged from 0 to 12 with a lower score indicating less severe symptoms. Mean baseline rTNSS was calculated by summing the means of the 4 individual symptom scores obtained over the 72 hours before the randomized treatment period. Mean change from baseline was calculated as mean baseline rTNSS - mean post-randomization rTNSS. A positive change from baseline in rTNSS is considered a favorable outcome.

Time frame: Baseline, 14 days

Population: Per-Protocol population was used in this analysis. To determine equivalence, only the test and reference treatment arms were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TestPRIMARY: Mean Change From Baseline in Reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS) (Equivalence: Per-Protocol Population)2.036 score on scaleStandard Deviation 2.415
ReferencePRIMARY: Mean Change From Baseline in Reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS) (Equivalence: Per-Protocol Population)1.904 score on scaleStandard Deviation 2.409
90% CI: [87.421, 124.21]
Primary

PRIMARY: Mean Change From Baseline in Reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS) (Superiority: Intent-to-Treat Population)

Patients were required to record a 12 hour reflective score twice a day approximately 12 hours apart. For the rTNSS patients were asked to look back or reflect on their severity of nasal symptoms over the previous 12 hours. The first rating on each day was taken prior to dosing. Patients were asked to score 4 nasal symptoms (nasal congestion, runny nose, sneezing and itchy nose) on a 4 point scale ranging from 0 (no symptom) to 3 (severe symptom). The means of the 4 individual symptom scores obtained over the randomized treatment period were summed to give the mean rTNSS, which ranged from 0 to 12 with a lower score indicating less severe symptoms. Mean baseline rTNSS was calculated by summing the means of the 4 individual symptom scores obtained over the 72 hours before the randomized treatment period. Mean change from baseline was calculated as mean baseline rTNSS - mean post-randomization rTNSS. A positive change from baseline in rTNSS is considered a favorable outcome.

Time frame: Baseline, 14 days

Population: Intent-to-Treat Population including participants with valid measurements for the outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TestPRIMARY: Mean Change From Baseline in Reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS) (Superiority: Intent-to-Treat Population)2.035 score on scaleStandard Deviation 2.362
ReferencePRIMARY: Mean Change From Baseline in Reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS) (Superiority: Intent-to-Treat Population)1.845 score on scaleStandard Deviation 2.378
PlaceboPRIMARY: Mean Change From Baseline in Reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS) (Superiority: Intent-to-Treat Population)0.952 score on scaleStandard Deviation 1.842
p-value: <0.0001ANCOVA
p-value: 0.0001ANCOVA
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in Instantaneous Total Nasal Symptom Score (iTNSS) (Equivalence: Per-Protocol Population)

Participants were required to record an instantaneous score twice a day approximately 12 hours apart. For the iTNSS participants were asked to evaluate how I feel now regarding their severity of nasal symptoms. The first rating on each day was taken prior to dosing. Participants were asked to score 4 nasal symptoms (nasal congestion, runny nose, sneezing and itchy nose) on a 4 point scale ranging from 0 (no symptom) to 3 (severe symptom). The means of the 4 individual symptom scores obtained over the randomized treatment period were summed to give the mean iTNSS, which ranged from 0 to 12 with a lower score indicating less severe symptoms. Mean baseline iTNSS was calculated by summing the means of the 4 individual symptom scores obtained over the 72 hours before the randomized treatment period. Mean change from baseline was calculated as mean baseline iTNSS - mean post-randomization iTNSS. A positive change from baseline in iTNSS is considered a favorable outcome.

Time frame: Baseline, 14 days

Population: Per-Protocol population was used in this analysis. To determine equivalence, only the test and reference treatment arms were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TestMean Change From Baseline in Instantaneous Total Nasal Symptom Score (iTNSS) (Equivalence: Per-Protocol Population)2.017 score on scaleStandard Deviation 2.439
ReferenceMean Change From Baseline in Instantaneous Total Nasal Symptom Score (iTNSS) (Equivalence: Per-Protocol Population)1.854 score on scaleStandard Deviation 2.411
90% CI: [89.256, 127.79]
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in Instantaneous Total Nasal Symptom Score (iTNSS) (Superiority: Intent-to-Treat Population)

Participants were required to record an instantaneous score twice a day approximately 12 hours apart. For the iTNSS participants were asked to evaluate how I feel now regarding their severity of nasal symptoms. The first rating on each day was taken prior to dosing. Participants were asked to score 4 nasal symptoms (nasal congestion, runny nose, sneezing and itchy nose) on a 4 point scale ranging from 0 (no symptom) to 3 (severe symptom). The means of the 4 individual symptom scores obtained over the randomized treatment period were summed to give the mean iTNSS, which ranged from 0 to 12 with a lower score indicating less severe symptoms. Mean baseline iTNSS was calculated by summing the means of the 4 individual symptom scores obtained over the 72 hours before the randomized treatment period. Mean change from baseline was calculated as mean baseline iTNSS - mean post-randomization iTNSS. A positive change from baseline in iTNSS is considered a favorable outcome.

Time frame: Baseline, 14 days

Population: Intent-to-Treat Population including participants with valid measurements for the outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TestMean Change From Baseline in Instantaneous Total Nasal Symptom Score (iTNSS) (Superiority: Intent-to-Treat Population)1.994 score on scaleStandard Deviation 2.398
ReferenceMean Change From Baseline in Instantaneous Total Nasal Symptom Score (iTNSS) (Superiority: Intent-to-Treat Population)1.805 score on scaleStandard Deviation 2.398
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Instantaneous Total Nasal Symptom Score (iTNSS) (Superiority: Intent-to-Treat Population)0.846 score on scaleStandard Deviation 1.981
p-value: <0.0001ANCOVA
p-value: <0.0001ANCOVA
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in Instantaneous Total Ocular Symptom Score (iTOSS) (Equivalence: Per-Protocol Population)

Patients were required to record an instantaneous score twice a day approximately 12 hours apart. For the iTOSS patients were asked to evaluate how I feel now regarding their severity of ocular symptoms. The first rating on each day was taken prior to dosing. Patients were asked to score 3 ocular symptoms (eye redness, itching/burning eyes, and tearing/watering eyes) on a 4 point scale ranging from 0 (no symptom) to 3 (severe symptom). The means of the 3 individual symptom scores obtained over the randomized treatment period were summed to give the mean rTOSS, which ranged from 0 to 9 with a lower score indicating less severe symptoms. Mean baseline rTOSS was calculated by summing the means of the 3 individual symptom scores obtained over the 72 hours before the randomized treatment period. Mean change from baseline was calculated as mean baseline iTOSS - mean post-randomization iTOSS. A positive change from baseline in iTOSS is considered a favorable outcome.

Time frame: Baseline, 14 days

Population: Per-Protocol population was used in this analysis. To determine equivalence, only the test and reference treatment arms were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TestMean Change From Baseline in Instantaneous Total Ocular Symptom Score (iTOSS) (Equivalence: Per-Protocol Population)1.389 score on scaleStandard Deviation 1.884
ReferenceMean Change From Baseline in Instantaneous Total Ocular Symptom Score (iTOSS) (Equivalence: Per-Protocol Population)1.135 score on scaleStandard Deviation 1.803
90% CI: [95.41, 146.583]
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in Instantaneous Total Ocular Symptom Score (iTOSS) (Superiority: Intent-to-Treat Population)

Patients were required to record an instantaneous score twice a day approximately 12 hours apart. For the iTOSS patients were asked to evaluate how I feel now regarding their severity of ocular symptoms. The first rating on each day was taken prior to dosing. Patients were asked to score 3 ocular symptoms (eye redness, itching/burning eyes, and tearing/watering eyes) on a 4 point scale ranging from 0 (no symptom) to 3 (severe symptom). The means of the 3 individual symptom scores obtained over the randomized treatment period were summed to give the mean rTOSS, which ranged from 0 to 9 with a lower score indicating less severe symptoms. Mean baseline rTOSS was calculated by summing the means of the 3 individual symptom scores obtained over the 72 hours before the randomized treatment period. Mean change from baseline was calculated as mean baseline iTOSS - mean post-randomization iTOSS. A positive change from baseline in iTOSS is considered a favorable outcome.

Time frame: Baseline, 14 days

Population: Intent-to-Treat Population including participants with valid measurements for the outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TestMean Change From Baseline in Instantaneous Total Ocular Symptom Score (iTOSS) (Superiority: Intent-to-Treat Population)1.362 score on scaleStandard Deviation 1.851
ReferenceMean Change From Baseline in Instantaneous Total Ocular Symptom Score (iTOSS) (Superiority: Intent-to-Treat Population)1.118 score on scaleStandard Deviation 1.784
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Instantaneous Total Ocular Symptom Score (iTOSS) (Superiority: Intent-to-Treat Population)0.787 score on scaleStandard Deviation 1.563
p-value: 0.0018ANCOVA
p-value: 0.0451ANCOVA
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in Reflective Total Ocular Symptom Score (rTOSS) (Equivalence: Per-Protocol Population)

Patients were required to record a 12 hour reflective score twice a day approximately 12 hours apart. For the rTOSS patients were asked to look back or reflect on their severity of ocular symptoms over the previous 12 hours. The first rating on each day was taken prior to dosing. Patients were asked to score 3 ocular symptoms (eye redness, itching/burning eyes, and tearing/watering eyes) on a 4 point scale ranging from 0 (no symptom) to 3 (severe symptom). The means of the 3 individual symptom scores obtained over the randomized treatment period were summed to give the mean rTOSS, which ranged from 0 to 9 with a lower score indicating less severe symptoms. Mean baseline rTOSS was calculated by summing the means of the 3 individual symptom scores obtained over the 72 hours before the randomized treatment period. Mean change from baseline was calculated as mean baseline rTOSS - mean post-randomization rTOSS. A positive change from baseline is considered a favorable outcome.

Time frame: Baseline, 14 days

Population: Per-Protocol population was used in this analysis. To determine equivalence, only the test and reference treatment arms were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TestMean Change From Baseline in Reflective Total Ocular Symptom Score (rTOSS) (Equivalence: Per-Protocol Population)1.388 score on scaleStandard Deviation 1.831
ReferenceMean Change From Baseline in Reflective Total Ocular Symptom Score (rTOSS) (Equivalence: Per-Protocol Population)1.152 score on scaleStandard Deviation 1.79
90% CI: [94.129, 143.949]
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in Reflective Total Ocular Symptom Score (rTOSS) (Superiority: Intent-to-Treat Population)

Patients were required to record a 12 hour reflective score twice a day approximately 12 hours apart. For the rTOSS patients were asked to look back or reflect on their severity of ocular symptoms over the previous 12 hours. The first rating on each day was taken prior to dosing. Patients were asked to score 3 ocular symptoms (eye redness, itching/burning eyes, and tearing/watering eyes) on a 4 point scale ranging from 0 (no symptom) to 3 (severe symptom). The means of the 3 individual symptom scores obtained over the randomized treatment period were summed to give the mean rTOSS, which ranged from 0 to 9 with a lower score indicating less severe symptoms. Mean baseline rTOSS was calculated by summing the means of the 3 individual symptom scores obtained over the 72 hours before the randomized treatment period. Mean change from baseline was calculated as mean baseline rTOSS - mean post-randomization rTOSS. A positive change from baseline is considered a favorable outcome.

Time frame: Baseline, 14 days

Population: Intent-to-Treat Population including participants with valid measurements for the outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TestMean Change From Baseline in Reflective Total Ocular Symptom Score (rTOSS) (Superiority: Intent-to-Treat Population)1.373 score on scaleStandard Deviation 1.795
ReferenceMean Change From Baseline in Reflective Total Ocular Symptom Score (rTOSS) (Superiority: Intent-to-Treat Population)1.128 score on scaleStandard Deviation 1.762
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Reflective Total Ocular Symptom Score (rTOSS) (Superiority: Intent-to-Treat Population)0.787 score on scaleStandard Deviation 1.527
p-value: 0.0018ANCOVA
p-value: 0.0441ANCOVA

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026