Skip to content

Prevention of Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy Using Rituximab (Rituxan) Therapy in Cardiac Transplantation

Prevention of Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy Using Rituximab (Rituxan) Therapy in Cardiac Transplantation (CTOT-11)

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01278745
Enrollment
362
Registered
2011-01-19
Start date
2011-09-30
Completion date
2015-10-31
Last updated
2020-08-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy, Heart Transplant Recipients

Keywords

cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV), prevention, cardiac transplantation, rituximab

Brief summary

All people who have a heart transplant are at risk for developing cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV). CAV means narrowing of the heart transplant vessels, which is associated with poor heart transplant function. People who develop antibodies after transplant have a higher risk of developing CAV. Infections, high cholesterol, and rejection also increase the risk of developing CAV. People who develop CAV usually have to receive another transplant.

Detailed description

The purpose of this research study is to see if a study drug called rituximab (Rituxan®) prevents CAV. Rituximab destroys certain types of white blood cells called B cells. B cells are important cells in the immune system that help the body fight infection by producing substances called antibodies. B cells and the antibodies they produce are also involved in some kinds of rejection after organ transplantation. Rituximab decreases the number of B cells in the blood and other tissues. The goal of this study is to determine if decreasing B cells with Rituximab can prevent injury to the transplanted heart.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALRituximab induction/conventional immunosuppression (tacrolimus, MMF, and steroid taper)
DRUGRituximab placebo/conventional immunosuppression (tacrolimus, MMF, and steroid taper)

Sponsors

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
CollaboratorNIH
Clinical Trials in Organ Transplantation
CollaboratorNETWORK
Genentech, Inc.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Rho Federal Systems Division, Inc.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
Lead SponsorNIH

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

for Initial Enrollment: * Subject must be able to understand and provide informed consent; * Male or Female, 18 to 75 years of age; * Candidate for a primary heart transplant (e.g., listed for heart transplant only); * Historical panel reactive antibodies (PRA) less than 30%; * Calculated GFR ≥ 40 mL/minute using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation (CKD-EPI); * Female and male subjects with reproductive potential, must agree to use FDA approved methods of birth control for the duration of the study Inclusion Criteria for Randomization / Post-transplant: --Negative PRA within 12 weeks prior to transplant (Local HLA Center Testing) using one of the following: * One Lambda's LABScreen® Mixed Class I & II (presence or absence), or * Less than 10% by One Lambda's LABScreen® PRA Class I and II with an MFI of \<2000, or * Calculated panel reactive antibodies (cPRA) less than 10% by LABScreen® Single Antigen testing (Anti-HLA-A, -B, -DR, -DQ). The antigens reported will include those with an MFI \>2000. The Luminex Gen-Probe beads are equivalent to the One Lambda and may be used as an alternative; * Calculated GFR ≥ 40mL/minute using the CKD-EPI at time of randomization; * Serum immunoglobulin G (IgG) level greater than 500mg/dL within 90 days prior to randomization; * Negative test for HIV, HBsAg, HBcAb, and HCV Ab within 12 months prior to transplant. If documentation is not present to support that the testing was performed in the past 12 months, then a blood sample will be collected prior to transplant and sent for local testing. Results may be available after randomization. If positive result, the oversight committee will review the case and provide further recommendations. * Female subjects of childbearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test.

Exclusion criteria

for Enrollment: * Prior history of organ transplantation; * Previous treatment with Rituximab (MabThera® / Rituxan ®); * Transplant physician intention to use any induction agents; * History of severe allergic anaphylactic reactions to humanized or murine monoclonal antibodies; * History of severe reaction to previous therapy with IVIG; * Active systemic infection at time of enrollment; * Any history of serologic positivity to HIV, HBsAg, HBcAb, and HCV Ab; * History of less than 5 years remission of malignancy. Any history of adequately treated in-situ cervical carcinoma, or adequately treated basal or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin will be permitted; * Any condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would interfere with the subject's ability to comply with study requirements; * Use of other investigational drugs within 4 weeks of enrollment; * Currently breast-feeding or plans to become pregnant during the timeframe of the study follow-up period.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Percent Atheroma Volume (PAV)Baseline, 1 yearNominal or noticeable change, bad or good, from baseline to 1 year in percent atheroma volume (PAV) which is a measure of the degree of coronary arterial obstruction due to host alloimmune processes measured by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) in a target coronary artery. Thus a decrease in PAV would be an indicator of less obstruction and a better outcome.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Re-transplantation or Re-listed for Transplantation6 to 12 monthsRe-transplantation is defined as the receipt of a subsequent heart transplant and re-listed for transplantation is being listed back on the heart transplant list to be re-transplanted.
Number of Episodes of Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR) of Any Grade Per Participant6 to 12 monthsThe number of times a participant experienced biopsy proven acute rejection (BPAR). Biopsy proven acute rejection is when an examination of tissue removed from the transplanted organ indicates that the subject's immune system is trying to reject the graft. BPAR was defined as a biopsy that met the International Society for Heart & Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) criteria to be graded as 1R or greater rejection and was determined by a single, central pathology laboratory.
Incidence of BPAR (Any Grade)6 to 12 monthsThe number of subjects who experienced any grade of biopsy proven acute rejection (BPAR) within the clinical trial. Biopsy proven acute rejection is when an examination of tissue removed from the transplanted organ indicates that the subject's immune system is trying to reject the graft. BPAR was defined as a biopsy which met The International Society for Heart & Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) criteria to be graded as 1R or greater rejection and was determined by a single, central pathology laboratory.
Incidence of AMR6 to 12 monthsThe number of participants who experienced antibody- mediated rejection (AMR). Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) occurs when the subject develops antibodies directed against the transplanted heart. This was assessed based on local pathology biopsy reads.
Incidence of Cellular Rejection6 to 12 monthsCellular Rejection refers to the organ recipient's immune system recognizing a transplanted organ as foreign and mounting a response to it via cellular mechanisms. Cellular rejection was defined as a biopsy which met The International Society for Heart & Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) criteria to be graded as 1R or greater rejection and was determined by a single, central pathology laboratory
Death12 monthsParticipants who died within 12 months post-transplant
Number of Participants With Episodes of Rejection Associated With Hemodynamic Compromise (HDC)6 to 12 monthsThe number of participants that experienced at least one episode of rejection associated with hemodynamic compromise (HDC). Rejection associated with HDC is when there is insufficient blood flow to the transplanted heart in association with acute rejection found in a biopsy. Local biopsies were used for this outcome measure.
Number of Participants With Development of Angiographically Evident Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy1 yearCardiac allograft vasculopathy is an aggressive form of atherosclerosis that is characterized by the development of fibrosis affecting cardiac arteries that result in concentric narrowing of the arteries and, ultimately allograft failure. Development of cardiac allograft vasculopathy can be diagnosed via an angiograph which is an X-ray of the cardiac arteries by injecting a radiopaque substance such as iodine.
Number of Participants With Post-transplant Serious Infections Requiring Intravenous Antimicrobial TherapyTransplantation through end of study, up to 1 year post transplantation.Number of participants experiencing at least one serious infection requiring intravenous antimicrobial therapy which is used to kill the growth of microorganisms such as bacteria, fungi, or protozoans.
Number of Participants With Post-transplant Incidence of PTLDTransplantation through end of study, up to 1 year post transplantation.The number of participants experiencing at least one post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) occurrence during this trial. Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder is an uncontrolled proliferation of B cell lymphocytes latently infected with Epstein-Barr virus.
Post-transplant Safety Outcomes Among Participants: Safety and Tolerability of RituximabTransplantation through end of study, up to 1 year post transplantationDefined as participants that experienced at least one adverse event that was possibly, probably, or definitely related to the study drug (i.e., Rituximab or Placebo). Serious adverse events were used to evaluate this endpoint and the attribution was based on the DAIT Medical Monitor's assessment.
Incidence of Any Treated Rejection6 to 12 monthsThe number of participants who were treated by their local physician for any type of rejection including, but not limited to cellular rejection and antibody- mediated rejection (AMR) of the transplanted heart regardless of the presence of a biopsy.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Twenty three out of N=24 participating sites in the United States enrolled 362 participants into this trial. N=163 participants reached the randomization stage of the trial.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Rituximab
Induction: Rituximab was administered in 2 1000 mg doses on Day 0 and Day 12 (+/- 2 days). Maintenance: Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF) was given at a starting dose of 2-3 g by mouth or intravenously per day in 2 or 3 divided doses. Investigator could choose an alternative treatment if needed. Methylprednisolone/Prednisone dosing was administered according to the local center standard. After 6 months, prednisone was withdrawn at the discretion of the investigator. The suggested oral prednisone taper was Day 14: 20 mg/day by mouth, Day 30: 15 mg/day by mouth, Day 90: 10 mg/day by mouth, Day 180: 5 mg/day by mouth, and greater than Day 180: 0-5 mg/day by mouth. Tacrolimus, was administered per site standards to attain target trough levels. The target whole blood tacrolimus concentrations were as follows: Day 1-30 post transplant 10-20 ng/mL and Day 31-Month 12 5-15 ng/mL.
89
Placebo
Induction: Rituximab Placebo was administered in 2 1000 mg doses on Day 0 and Day 12 (+/- 2 days). Maintenance: Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF) was given at a starting dose of 2-3 g by mouth or intravenously per day in 2 or 3 divided doses. Investigator could choose an alternative treatment if needed. Methylprednisolone/Prednisone dosing was administered according to the local center standard. After 6 months, prednisone was withdrawn at the discretion of the investigator. The suggested oral prednisone taper was Day 14: 20 mg/day by mouth, Day 30: 15 mg/day by mouth, Day 90: 10 mg/day by mouth, Day 180: 5 mg/day by mouth, and greater than Day 180: 0-5 mg/day by mouth. Tacrolimus, was administered per site standards to attain target trough levels. The target whole blood tacrolimus concentrations were as follows: Day 1-30 post transplant 10-20 ng/mL and Day 31-Month 12 5-15 ng/mL.
74
Total163

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Overall StudyDeath2570
Overall StudyIneligible004261
Overall StudyMoves,enrollment in mx studies, et al.0051
Overall StudyPhysician Decision1009
Overall StudySponsor Decision10626
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject1151

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalRituximabPlacebo
Age, Continuous54.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.75
54.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.8
54.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.76
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
16 Participants9 Participants7 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
134 Participants72 Participants62 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
13 Participants8 Participants5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
6 Participants5 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
19 Participants7 Participants12 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
10 Participants7 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
127 Participants70 Participants57 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
163 Participants89 Participants74 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
24 Participants16 Participants8 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
139 Participants73 Participants66 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
29 / 8926 / 740 / 1210 / 78
serious
Total, serious adverse events
55 / 8945 / 740 / 1211 / 78

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Percent Atheroma Volume (PAV)

Nominal or noticeable change, bad or good, from baseline to 1 year in percent atheroma volume (PAV) which is a measure of the degree of coronary arterial obstruction due to host alloimmune processes measured by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) in a target coronary artery. Thus a decrease in PAV would be an indicator of less obstruction and a better outcome.

Time frame: Baseline, 1 year

Population: Randomized participants with available data at year one

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RituximabChange in Percent Atheroma Volume (PAV)6.8 percentStandard Deviation 8.21
PlaceboChange in Percent Atheroma Volume (PAV)1.9 percentStandard Deviation 4.38
p-value: 0.0019ANCOVA
Secondary

Death

Participants who died within 12 months post-transplant

Time frame: 12 months

Population: Randomized subjects

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
RituximabDeath3 Participants
PlaceboDeath5 Participants
Secondary

Incidence of AMR

The number of participants who experienced antibody- mediated rejection (AMR). Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) occurs when the subject develops antibodies directed against the transplanted heart. This was assessed based on local pathology biopsy reads.

Time frame: 6 to 12 months

Population: Randomized participants

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
RituximabIncidence of AMR8 Participants
PlaceboIncidence of AMR11 Participants
Secondary

Incidence of Any Treated Rejection

The number of participants who were treated by their local physician for any type of rejection including, but not limited to cellular rejection and antibody- mediated rejection (AMR) of the transplanted heart regardless of the presence of a biopsy.

Time frame: 6 to 12 months

Population: Randomized participants

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
RituximabIncidence of Any Treated Rejection22 Participants
PlaceboIncidence of Any Treated Rejection24 Participants
Secondary

Incidence of BPAR (Any Grade)

The number of subjects who experienced any grade of biopsy proven acute rejection (BPAR) within the clinical trial. Biopsy proven acute rejection is when an examination of tissue removed from the transplanted organ indicates that the subject's immune system is trying to reject the graft. BPAR was defined as a biopsy which met The International Society for Heart & Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) criteria to be graded as 1R or greater rejection and was determined by a single, central pathology laboratory.

Time frame: 6 to 12 months

Population: Randomized participants with at least one centrally read heart biopsy

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
RituximabIncidence of BPAR (Any Grade)41 Participants
PlaceboIncidence of BPAR (Any Grade)52 Participants
Secondary

Incidence of Cellular Rejection

Cellular Rejection refers to the organ recipient's immune system recognizing a transplanted organ as foreign and mounting a response to it via cellular mechanisms. Cellular rejection was defined as a biopsy which met The International Society for Heart & Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) criteria to be graded as 1R or greater rejection and was determined by a single, central pathology laboratory

Time frame: 6 to 12 months

Population: Randomized participants with at least one centrally read heart biopsy

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
RituximabIncidence of Cellular Rejection41 Participants
PlaceboIncidence of Cellular Rejection52 Participants
Secondary

Number of Episodes of Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR) of Any Grade Per Participant

The number of times a participant experienced biopsy proven acute rejection (BPAR). Biopsy proven acute rejection is when an examination of tissue removed from the transplanted organ indicates that the subject's immune system is trying to reject the graft. BPAR was defined as a biopsy that met the International Society for Heart & Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) criteria to be graded as 1R or greater rejection and was determined by a single, central pathology laboratory.

Time frame: 6 to 12 months

Population: Randomized participants with at least one centrally read heart biopsy

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
RituximabNumber of Episodes of Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR) of Any Grade Per Participant1 Episode of BPAR13 Participants
RituximabNumber of Episodes of Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR) of Any Grade Per Participant3 Episodes of BPAR9 Participants
RituximabNumber of Episodes of Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR) of Any Grade Per Participant2 Episodes of BPAR17 Participants
RituximabNumber of Episodes of Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR) of Any Grade Per Participant4 Episodes of BPAR2 Participants
RituximabNumber of Episodes of Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR) of Any Grade Per Participant0 Episodes of BPAR45 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Episodes of Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR) of Any Grade Per Participant4 Episodes of BPAR2 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Episodes of Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR) of Any Grade Per Participant0 Episodes of BPAR18 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Episodes of Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR) of Any Grade Per Participant1 Episode of BPAR28 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Episodes of Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR) of Any Grade Per Participant2 Episodes of BPAR14 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Episodes of Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR) of Any Grade Per Participant3 Episodes of BPAR8 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Development of Angiographically Evident Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy

Cardiac allograft vasculopathy is an aggressive form of atherosclerosis that is characterized by the development of fibrosis affecting cardiac arteries that result in concentric narrowing of the arteries and, ultimately allograft failure. Development of cardiac allograft vasculopathy can be diagnosed via an angiograph which is an X-ray of the cardiac arteries by injecting a radiopaque substance such as iodine.

Time frame: 1 year

Population: Randomized participants

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
RituximabNumber of Participants With Development of Angiographically Evident Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy19 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Development of Angiographically Evident Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy7 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Episodes of Rejection Associated With Hemodynamic Compromise (HDC)

The number of participants that experienced at least one episode of rejection associated with hemodynamic compromise (HDC). Rejection associated with HDC is when there is insufficient blood flow to the transplanted heart in association with acute rejection found in a biopsy. Local biopsies were used for this outcome measure.

Time frame: 6 to 12 months

Population: Randomized participants

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
RituximabNumber of Participants With Episodes of Rejection Associated With Hemodynamic Compromise (HDC)2 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Episodes of Rejection Associated With Hemodynamic Compromise (HDC)1 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Post-transplant Incidence of PTLD

The number of participants experiencing at least one post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) occurrence during this trial. Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder is an uncontrolled proliferation of B cell lymphocytes latently infected with Epstein-Barr virus.

Time frame: Transplantation through end of study, up to 1 year post transplantation.

Population: Randomized participants

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
RituximabNumber of Participants With Post-transplant Incidence of PTLD0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Post-transplant Incidence of PTLD0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Post-transplant Serious Infections Requiring Intravenous Antimicrobial Therapy

Number of participants experiencing at least one serious infection requiring intravenous antimicrobial therapy which is used to kill the growth of microorganisms such as bacteria, fungi, or protozoans.

Time frame: Transplantation through end of study, up to 1 year post transplantation.

Population: Randomized participants

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
RituximabNumber of Participants With Post-transplant Serious Infections Requiring Intravenous Antimicrobial Therapy16 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Post-transplant Serious Infections Requiring Intravenous Antimicrobial Therapy13 Participants
Secondary

Post-transplant Safety Outcomes Among Participants: Safety and Tolerability of Rituximab

Defined as participants that experienced at least one adverse event that was possibly, probably, or definitely related to the study drug (i.e., Rituximab or Placebo). Serious adverse events were used to evaluate this endpoint and the attribution was based on the DAIT Medical Monitor's assessment.

Time frame: Transplantation through end of study, up to 1 year post transplantation

Population: Randomized participants

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
RituximabPost-transplant Safety Outcomes Among Participants: Safety and Tolerability of Rituximab26 Participants
PlaceboPost-transplant Safety Outcomes Among Participants: Safety and Tolerability of Rituximab26 Participants
Secondary

Re-transplantation or Re-listed for Transplantation

Re-transplantation is defined as the receipt of a subsequent heart transplant and re-listed for transplantation is being listed back on the heart transplant list to be re-transplanted.

Time frame: 6 to 12 months

Population: Randomized participants

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
RituximabRe-transplantation or Re-listed for Transplantation0 Participants
PlaceboRe-transplantation or Re-listed for Transplantation0 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 2, 2026