Skip to content

Safety and Efficacy Study of Subjects With Onychomycosis of the Great Toenail

An Open-Label, Rising Multiple-Dose, Multi-Center Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Topically Applied AN2690 5.0% and 7.5% Solution for the Treatment of Adult Subjects With Onychomycosis of the Great Toenail

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01278394
Enrollment
29
Registered
2011-01-17
Start date
2007-03-31
Completion date
2008-07-31
Last updated
2018-12-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Onychomycosis

Keywords

Onychomycosis, Fungal Nail

Brief summary

The purpose of the study is to determine the safety and efficacy of 5.0% AN2690 Solution in the treatment of distal, subungual onychomycosis of the great target toenail.

Detailed description

In this cohort, only the targeted great toenail identified at Baseline prior to the commencement of treatment from culture results collected at the Screening visit were evaluated for primary efficacy whereas all treated toenails were evaluated for safety. At each visit, the investigator was asked to make a clinical evaluation of the targeted great nail, marking whether or not they considered the nail to be clear of onychomycosis. This evaluation was the basis for determining whether or not study medication should be dispensed at the visit. This record includes information only for Cohort 3 (5% solution) of the study. Cohorts 1 and 2, are described in NCT00679523 (7.5% solution). No comparison was made between Cohorts 1&2 and Cohort 3.

Interventions

Once daily application for 360 days

Sponsors

Pfizer
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Subjects must meet all of the following criteria to be included in the study: 2. Witnessed, signed informed consent approved by Ethics Committee. 3. Male or female subjects of any race at least 18 years of age but not older than 65 years of age at the time of screening. 4. For Cohorts 1 and 2, subjects with a diagnosis of onychomycosis of at least one great toenail and with a positive KOH wet mount from that nail. For Cohort 3, subjects must have a diagnosis of onychomycosis of at least one great toenail and a positive KOH wet mount AND fungal culture from that nail. 5. Onychomycosis involving 20-60% of the affected great toenail as determined by visual inspection after the nail has been trimmed. 6. The combined thickness of the distal nail plate and the associated hyperkeratotic nail bed \<3 mm. 7. Affected great toenail to be treated is capable of re-growth as documented by history or recent observation of at least 2 mm of growth. 8. Normal or not clinically significant screening safety labs.

Exclusion criteria

1. Females of childbearing potential not using a highly effective method of birth control (e.g. implants, injectables, combined oral contraceptives, some intrauterine contraceptive devices) during the study. 2. Diabetes mellitus requiring treatment other than diet and exercise. 3. Subjects with chronic moccasin type of T. pedis. 4. Subjects with a history of having failed any previous topical antifungal therapy for their onychomycosis. 5. Subjects unwilling to refrain from the use of nail cosmetics such as clear and or colored nail lacquers from the screening visit until the end of the study. 6. Subjects that have not undergone the specified washout period(s) for the following topical preparations or subjects who require the concurrent use of any of the following topical medications: * Topical antifungal applied to the feet (does not include antifungals for treatment of T. pedis during the study): 4 weeks * Anti-inflammatories, corticosteroids, topical immunomodulators: 2 weeks 7. Subjects that have not undergone the specified washout period(s) for the following systemic medications or subjects who require the concurrent use of any of the following systemic medications: * Corticosteroids (including intramuscular injections): 2 weeks * Antifungals for treatment of onychomycosis or any systemic antifungal with known activity against dermatophytes: 24 weeks * Systemic immunomodulators: 4 weeks 8. Treatment of any type for cancer within the last 6 months. 9. History of any significant internal disease. 10. Subjects with a medical history of current or past psoriasis of the skin and/or nails. 11. Concurrent lichen planus. 12. Subjects who are known to be allergic to any of the test product(s) or any components in the test product(s) or history of hypersensitivity or allergic reactions to any of the study preparations as described in the Investigator's Brochure. 13. Nail or anatomic abnormalities of the toe, e.g., genetic nail disorders, primentary disorders, onychogryphosis, trauma to the nail(s) to be treated. 14. AIDS or AIDS related complex. 15. History of street drug or alcohol abuse. 16. Any subject not able to meet the study attendance requirements. 17. Subjects who have participated in any other trial of an investigational drug or device within 60 days prior to enrollment or participation in a research study concurrent with this study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Clinical Evidence of Complete Clearance of the Treatment-targeted Great Toenail Plus a Negative Fungal Culture at Day 360Day 360Proportion of subjects with a clinical assessment of a clear (completely normal) nail unit plus a negative fungal culture from the treatment-targeted toenail at Day 360.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Clear Nail Growth of the Targeted ToenailDay 360Clear nail was measured on digital images as the distance in millimeters from the proximal nail fold to the proximal limit of the disease as marked by the Investigator. New Clear Nail Growth (CNG) was calculated from the clear nail measurements.
Mycological Evaluations (Negative Potassium Hydroxide (KOH) and Negative Fungal Culture) Compared to BaselineDay 90Number of subjects with negative KOH, and number of subjects with negative fungal cultures.
Mycological Evaluations (Negative KOH and Negative Fungal Culture) Compared to BaselineDay 180Number of subjects with negative KOH, and number of subjects with negative fungal cultures.
Length of Time to Clinical Evaluation of Clear or at Least 5 mm of CNGBaseline to 360Length of time to clinical evaluation of clear or at least 5 mm of CNG.

Countries

Mexico

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Subjects were screened and enrolled and two investigative sites in Mexico. The study population included men and women of any race, 18-65 years of age who had distal, subungual onychomycosis of the great toenail. The first subject visit occurred on March 28, 2007, and the last subject visit occurred on July 11, 2008.

Pre-assignment details

All subjects in Cohort 3 were treated with 5.0% AN2690 Solution.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
AN2690 Solution, 5.0%
AN2690 Solution, 5.0%: Once daily application for 360 days
29
Total29

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAN2690 Solution, 5.0%
Age46.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.15
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
29 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
29 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Mexico
29 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
11 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
18 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
16 / 29
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 29

Outcome results

Primary

Clinical Evidence of Complete Clearance of the Treatment-targeted Great Toenail Plus a Negative Fungal Culture at Day 360

Proportion of subjects with a clinical assessment of a clear (completely normal) nail unit plus a negative fungal culture from the treatment-targeted toenail at Day 360.

Time frame: Day 360

Population: Efficacy data were analyzed for the ITT population. For efficacy variables, the last observation was carried forward (LOCF) to impute missing observations.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
AN2690 Solution, 5.0%Clinical Evidence of Complete Clearance of the Treatment-targeted Great Toenail Plus a Negative Fungal Culture at Day 360Success2 participants
AN2690 Solution, 5.0%Clinical Evidence of Complete Clearance of the Treatment-targeted Great Toenail Plus a Negative Fungal Culture at Day 360Failure27 participants
Secondary

Clear Nail Growth of the Targeted Toenail

Clear nail was measured on digital images as the distance in millimeters from the proximal nail fold to the proximal limit of the disease as marked by the Investigator. New Clear Nail Growth (CNG) was calculated from the clear nail measurements.

Time frame: Day 360

Population: Efficacy data were analyzed for the ITT population. For efficacy variables, the LOCF was used to impute missing observations.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
AN2690 Solution, 5.0%Clear Nail Growth of the Targeted Toenail0.5 millimeters
Secondary

Length of Time to Clinical Evaluation of Clear or at Least 5 mm of CNG

Length of time to clinical evaluation of clear or at least 5 mm of CNG.

Time frame: Baseline to 360

Population: Efficacy data were analyzed for the ITT population. For efficacy variables, the LOCF was used to impute missing observations.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
AN2690 Solution, 5.0%Length of Time to Clinical Evaluation of Clear or at Least 5 mm of CNG138.0 days
Secondary

Mycological Evaluations (Negative KOH and Negative Fungal Culture) Compared to Baseline

Number of subjects with negative KOH, and number of subjects with negative fungal cultures.

Time frame: Day 180

Population: Efficacy data were analyzed for the ITT population. For efficacy variables, the LOCF was used to impute missing observations.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
AN2690 Solution, 5.0%Mycological Evaluations (Negative KOH and Negative Fungal Culture) Compared to BaselineFungal Culture Result Positive0 participants
AN2690 Solution, 5.0%Mycological Evaluations (Negative KOH and Negative Fungal Culture) Compared to BaselineFungal Culture Result Negative29 participants
AN2690 Solution, 5.0%Mycological Evaluations (Negative KOH and Negative Fungal Culture) Compared to BaselineKOH Result Positive20 participants
AN2690 Solution, 5.0%Mycological Evaluations (Negative KOH and Negative Fungal Culture) Compared to BaselineKOH Result Negative9 participants
Secondary

Mycological Evaluations (Negative KOH and Negative Fungal Culture) Compared to Baseline

Number of subjects with negative KOH, and number of subjects with negative fungal cultures.

Time frame: Day 270

Population: Efficacy data were analyzed for the ITT population. For efficacy variables, the LOCF was used to impute missing observations.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
AN2690 Solution, 5.0%Mycological Evaluations (Negative KOH and Negative Fungal Culture) Compared to BaselineFungal Culture Result Positive1 participants
AN2690 Solution, 5.0%Mycological Evaluations (Negative KOH and Negative Fungal Culture) Compared to BaselineFungal Culture Result Negative28 participants
AN2690 Solution, 5.0%Mycological Evaluations (Negative KOH and Negative Fungal Culture) Compared to BaselineKOH Result Positive17 participants
AN2690 Solution, 5.0%Mycological Evaluations (Negative KOH and Negative Fungal Culture) Compared to BaselineKOH Result Negative12 participants
Secondary

Mycological Evaluations (Negative KOH and Negative Fungal Culture) Compared to Baseline

Number of subjects with negative KOH, and number of subjects with negative fungal cultures.

Time frame: Day 360

Population: Efficacy data were analyzed for the ITT population. For efficacy variables, the LOCF was used to impute missing observations.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
AN2690 Solution, 5.0%Mycological Evaluations (Negative KOH and Negative Fungal Culture) Compared to BaselineFungal Culture Result Positive1 participants
AN2690 Solution, 5.0%Mycological Evaluations (Negative KOH and Negative Fungal Culture) Compared to BaselineFungal Culture Result Negative28 participants
AN2690 Solution, 5.0%Mycological Evaluations (Negative KOH and Negative Fungal Culture) Compared to BaselineKOH Result Positive23 participants
AN2690 Solution, 5.0%Mycological Evaluations (Negative KOH and Negative Fungal Culture) Compared to BaselineKOH Result Negative6 participants
Secondary

Mycological Evaluations (Negative Potassium Hydroxide (KOH) and Negative Fungal Culture) Compared to Baseline

Number of subjects with negative KOH, and number of subjects with negative fungal cultures.

Time frame: Day 90

Population: Efficacy data were analyzed for the ITT population. For efficacy variables, the LOCF was used to impute missing observations.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
AN2690 Solution, 5.0%Mycological Evaluations (Negative Potassium Hydroxide (KOH) and Negative Fungal Culture) Compared to BaselineFungal Culture Result Positive1 participants
AN2690 Solution, 5.0%Mycological Evaluations (Negative Potassium Hydroxide (KOH) and Negative Fungal Culture) Compared to BaselineFungal Culture Result Negative28 participants
AN2690 Solution, 5.0%Mycological Evaluations (Negative Potassium Hydroxide (KOH) and Negative Fungal Culture) Compared to BaselineKOH Result Positive24 participants
AN2690 Solution, 5.0%Mycological Evaluations (Negative Potassium Hydroxide (KOH) and Negative Fungal Culture) Compared to BaselineKOH Result Negative5 participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026