Skip to content

Study of the Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon Catheter in Bifurcated Coronary Lesions

Prospective Randomized Study of the Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon Catheter in Bifurcated Coronary Lesions / BABILON Study (Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon in Bifurcated Lesions)

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01278186
Acronym
BABILON
Enrollment
190
Registered
2011-01-17
Start date
2010-06-30
Completion date
2013-12-31
Last updated
2012-07-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Coronary Artery Disease

Keywords

Coronary stenosis, Bifurcation, Drug-eluting balloon, Drug-eluting stent, Angiographic follow-up, Late Lumen Loss, Restenosis

Brief summary

This study in bifurcated coronary lesions compares the new technology of the paclitaxel-eluting balloon with the usual technique until now of provisional stenting with the paclitaxel-eluting stent in the main branch.

Detailed description

The bifurcated coronary lesions are still a challenge for interventional cardiologists, since there is no suitable technique or strategy to manage such lesions. This multicenter randomized prospective trial in bifurcated coronary lesions will compare the new technology of the paclitaxel-eluting balloon with the until now gold standard technique of the provisional stenting with the paclitaxel DES in the main branch.

Interventions

PROCEDUREBalloon angioplasty

Coronary angioplasty using the paclitaxel-coated balloon catheter

Coronary angioplasty using the paclitaxel-eluting stent

Sponsors

Hospital Universitario Infanta Cristina de Badajoz
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
B.Braun Surgical SA
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

PATIENTS * Patients with stable angina (1-3) or unstable angina (1-3 A-C) or documented silent ischemia * Patients with mental and logistic conditions for the follow-up * Patients should accept an angiographic follow-up at 9 months, a clinical follow-up at 3 years and sign the consent LESIONS * De-novo lesions in the bifurcations of DA/Diag either CX/OM or CD/DP with diameters in the main vessel of 2,5 to 3,8/ 2 to 3,5 and lengths \< 22 mm * The left main lesions in bifurcation are also accepted but with another independent randomization list (specify at randomization) * The diameter of the stenoses should be \>50% in any branch with documented ischemia or more than 70% in absence of an ischemia test * Single vessel or multivessel disease * In case of a PTCA of more than one lesion, the non included lesion should be treated previously to the included lesion

Exclusion criteria

PATIENTS * Patients with STEMI \< 72 hours * Patients with congestive heart failure or NYHA IV, shock or severe valvular heart disease * Patients with short life expectancy, or with problems for platelet antiaggregation * Patients in treatment with hyperthyroidism, in treatment with immunosuppression or anticoagulants, or with alcohol or drug addiction * Patients included in other trials * Patients with a stroke 6 months before * Patients with a surgery one week before * Severe renal failure calculated as GF \< 30 ml/min Cockcroft Gault * Women of childbearing age, with probability to become pregnant during the first year of follow-up LESIONS * Evidence of important thrombus within the vessel to treat * Patients with another stent previously implanted at ≤ 15 mm from the current lesion of the study * Lesions affecting bypass * Chronic occlusions to treat * Restenosis in-stent or of a segment in 4 mm close to the target lesion * Severe calcification not totally dilatable with the balloon

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Late Lumen Loss (LLL)Late angiographic follow-up (9 months)Assessment of the difference between both groups regarding the Late Lumen Loss (LLL) in main vessel and side branch, measured at late angiographic follow-up at 9 months
RestenosisLate angiographic follow-up (9 months)Assessment of the difference between both groups regarding the Restenosis in both branches (proximal part of the main vessel, distal part of the main vessel and side branch), measured at late angiographic follow-up at 9 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Thrombosis rateLate angiographic follow-up (9 months)Assesment of the thrombosis rate
Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR)Late angiographic follow-up (9 months)Assessment of the Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR) at late angiographic follow-up (9 months) if dilatation by restenosis or previous angiography due to angina
Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE)Late angiographic follow-up (9 months)Assessment of the rate of Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE): death, AMI, Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR) - due to angina pectoris or angiographic restenosis-

Countries

Spain

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026