Skip to content

Pulmonary Vein Ablation Versus Amiodarone in the Elderly

Pulmonary Vein Ablation Versus Amiodarone in the Elderly

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01276093
Acronym
PAVANE
Enrollment
59
Registered
2011-01-13
Start date
2011-07-31
Completion date
2016-03-31
Last updated
2015-12-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Atrial Fibrillation

Keywords

Atrial fibrillation, PVI ablation, Elderly patients, Efficacy

Brief summary

The purpose of the study is to demonstrate that in patients of 70 years or older with symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using RF ablation therapy is superior to medical treatment with amiodarone to prevent recurrence of AF.

Detailed description

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia. The prevalence of AF is highly age dependent as 70% of AF patients is between 65 and 85 years old. With increasing life expectancy, AF prevalence will increase 2,5 times during the next 50 years and constitute an even more important health concern. In younger patients Pulmonary vein ablation is an accepted procedure with superior efficacy compared to medical treatment. In this study the safety and efficacy of PVI in patients over 70 years old will be evaluated.

Interventions

PROCEDUREPVI ablation

Pulmonary Vein Ablation using RF.

DRUGAmiodarone

Amiodarone tablets

Sponsors

Abbott Medical Devices
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
65 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age ≥ 65 years at moment of screening, able to sign informed consent. * Documented paroxysmal AF in association with complaints in the last year, with at least 2 episodes of complaints attributed to AF in the previous 2 months. * Paroxysmal AF documented with at least one ECG with sinus rhythm not after cardioversion in the last year. * No prior use of amiodarone in the last 6 months and no usage longer than 4 weeks in total.

Exclusion criteria

* EF \< 35 % or description of poor left ventricular function on echocardiogram. Measurement should not be older than 6 months at moment of screening. * Aortic, mitral, pulmonary or tricuspid valve regurgitation or stenosis, if graded severe (grade \>3) * Acute illness: unstable angina, infectious disease. * Primary structural or electrical heart disease: dilated cardiomyopathy, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, Brugada syndrome, long QT syndrome. * Reversible causes (thyroid dysfunction, uncontrolled hypertension, ischemia). * Previous ablation. * Contraindications for amiodarone; liver dysfunction (serum alanine aminotransferase \>2.5 times upper limit); thyroid dysfunction; chronic lung disease; baseline QTc \>460 ms. sinus node dysfunction (pause more than 3 seconds in sinus rhythm); second or third degree AV-block. * Contraindications for anti-coagulation: prior life threatening hemorrhage under use of Vitamin K antagonists. * Any myocardial infarction or PCI in previous 6 months. * CABG in previous 6 months. * Renal dysfunction: creatinine clearance \<45 ml/min * Severe co-morbidity. Life expectancy less than 1 year. * Thrombus in left atrium * Untreatable allergy to contrast media

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Recurrence of episodes of AF, atypical atrial flutter or left sided atrial tachycardiaUntil 1 year after post treatment blanking period

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Composite end point of hospitalization, stroke, major bleeding and deathUntil last patient has been followed for 15 months after inclusion

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026