Skip to content

Hypothermic Machine Preservation-Phase 2

Hypothermic Machine Preservation of Extended Criteria Liver Allografts for Transplantation

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01274520
Acronym
HMP2
Enrollment
24
Registered
2011-01-11
Start date
2009-12-19
Completion date
2014-07-31
Last updated
2020-07-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Liver Damage

Keywords

ECD liver transplant allografts, Hypothermic machine perfusion, Cold storage preservation, liver transplant, portable bypass system, machine perfusion preservation, extended criteria liver

Brief summary

This is a study comparing a technique of continuous circulation to the liver as a means of preventing liver damage during transportation to the transplant hospital. This new technique of Machine Perfusion (MP) will be compared to the standard technique where the liver is maintained in a bag of solution on ice without circulation. The investigators will evaluate and compare the outcomes of the transplants with the new technique to the standard technique. There will be 24 MP patient's in the study. The investigators have previously used this technique with success in 20 human liver transplant patients. The investigators think there will be a benefit in terms of less damage to and better function of the donor liver which will result in faster recovery for the patients. This protective effect may allow us to successfully transplant more patients and prevent people from dying while waiting for a liver transplant.

Detailed description

It is our hypothesis that liver machine perfusion will increase the safe utilization of the existing supply of extended criteria donor (ECD) livers by (1) increasing the quality and duration of preservation thereby reducing the clinical effects reperfusion injury (2) improving early outcomes in patients receiving ECD liver allografts (3) developing reliable markers for pretransplant assessment of the potential graft (4) giving surgeons more confidence when transplanting ECD livers and (5) allowing an avenue for ex vivo manipulation of the liver to protect or restore a transiently injured liver. The proposed study is a matched cohort design. Potential subjects will be recruited from the Center for Liver Disease and Transplantation (CLDT) active Liver Transplant Waiting List. The Principal Investigator as well as the CoInvestigators, are all actively involved in the pre transplant evaluation process. Patients who are on the Waiting List and have provided written consent to receive an ECD graft will be recruited for this trial. Subjects will be matched with 24 historical control patients who received similar cold stored ECD grafts. Subjects will be matched on known covariates including donor age, donation after cardiac death, steatosis, both warm and cold ischemia times, recipient age, Model End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score and disease etiology. Subjects will be noncritically ill, not in an intensive care unit, and have a MELD \< 35 in order to minimize the variability in outcome in the sickest patients. All subjects must provide written informed consent and meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Subjects will be followed for one year post transplantation, in conjunction with their routine liver transplant followup appointments. Retention of subjects for this trial will not be a challenge, in that the followup visit time points (postoperative days 1 through the discharge date, 7, 14, 30, 90, 180 and 365) are all consistent with our standard of care.

Interventions

DEVICEThe Medtronic Portable Bypass System (PBS®)

Will be used for machine perfusion of liver grafts.

Sponsors

Columbia University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Signed written informed IRB consent by patient or patient's legally appointed representative. * Be at least 18 years of age; male or female. * Listed with UNOS for liver transplantation. * Organ declined by at least one transplant center * Extended criteria donor as defined by: * Presence of hepatitis C antibody * Donation after Cardiac Death (DCD) * Severe Hypernatremia: donor serum sodium \>165 meq/L for at least 12 hours prior to procurement * Donor age ≥65 years * Presence of significant steatosis \>25% macrovesicular by biopsy * Evidence of significant donor ischemic injury * Current donor serum aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or alanine aminotransferase (ALT) \>1000 IU/L * Ischemic injury evidenced by prolonged hypotension, high pressor requirement and/or rising serum liver function tests or one test more than five times the upper limit of normal (AST, ALT, or Total Bilirubin)

Exclusion criteria

* Patients in whom the donor liver will be subjected to less than 4 hours of cold ischemia (surgeon desires immediate implantation) * Patient hospitalized in intensive care unit (ICU) at time of transplantation and/or physiologic MELD score \>35 * Dual organ recipient * ABO incompatibility * Retransplantation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient Survival at One Year Post-TransplantationPost-Operative Day 1 to Day 365
Graft Survival at One Year Post-TransplantationPost-Operative Day 1 to Day 365Analysis was based on the amount of liver allografts in each cohort that were deemed to be clinically functional at 1 year post-transplantation (i.e. no re-transplantation required).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence of Post-Operative Complications1 Month Post-TransplantationIncidence of Retransplants or Hepatic Artery Thrombosis (HAT) within 1 month post-transplantation
Incidence of Bile LeaksPost-Operative Day 1 to Day 365Incidence of bile leaks.
Incidence of Re-Operation For BleedingPost-Operative Day 1 to Day 365Incidence of patients who required re-operation for a bleeding event
Incidence of Hernia Events Within 1 Year Post-TransplantationPost-Operative Day 1 to Day 365
Incidence of Primary Graft NonfunctionPost-Operative Day 1 to Day 7Incidence of Primary Graft Nonfunction (PNF), defined as follows: * Relisted for orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) within 7 days of OLT, not for vascular thromboses * Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) \>2000 and one or both of: acidosis with pH \<7.3 or lactate \>2X (two times) normal * International normalized ratio (INR) \>2.5
Time With Stent (Days)Post-Operative Day 1 to Day 365Measure of biliary complications as evidenced by mean time with stent (in days).
Incidence of Biliary StricturesPost-Operative Day 1 to Day 365Incidence of biliary strictures.
Incidence of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatographies (ERCPs)Post-Operative Day 1 to Day 365Incidence of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographies (ERCPs)
Hospital Length of Stay (Index Transplant Hospitalization)First admission after transplantLength of transplant hospital stay post-transplantation (Index Transplant Hospitalization)
Incidence of Early Allograft Dysfunction (EAD)Within the first 7 days post-transplantationIncidence of Early Allograft Dysfunction (EAD), defined as follows: * Bilirubin \>10 on post-operative day (POD)#7 * International normalized ratio (INR) \>1.6 on POD#7 * Transaminase level (aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or alanine aminotransferase (ALT)) \>2000 within the first 7 days

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

24 liver recipients who received extended criteria donor (ECD) liver transplant allografts were recruited for our treatment group over a span of 2 years. As a high-volume, major NY transplant center with approximately 270 adult patients on our Liver Transplant Waiting List and 45-50% receiving ECD grafts, we were able to meet our enrollment goal.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Matched Control Group
This study had a matched cohort design. Treatment subjects were matched with 25 historical control patients who received similar cold stored extended criteria donor (ECD) grafts. Subjects were matched on known covariates including donor age, donation after cardiac death, steatosis, both warm and cold ischemia times, recipient age, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score and disease etiology. Additional analyses were performed on historical control blood and/or tissue samples previously collected and stored in the study's sample repository.
25
Experimental: Hypothermic Machine Perfusion Group Group
24 subjects were treated with the Medtronic Portable Bypass System (PBS®) with Model 550 Bioconsole, and the BioCal® blood temperature control module was used for machine perfusion of liver grafts. These products are commercially available and are used in clinical practice for cardiopulmonary bypass and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. The Medtronic system utilizes an atraumatic centrifugal pump that can deliver the flow rates approximating portal venous flow in human livers, and it has modules for online membrane oxygenation, and electronic flow measurement.
24
Total49

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicMatched Control GroupExperimental: Hypothermic Machine Perfusion Group GroupTotal
Age, Customized
18-21 years
0 participants0 participants0 participants
Age, Customized
22-29 years
0 participants0 participants0 participants
Age, Customized
30-39 years
0 participants1 participants1 participants
Age, Customized
40-49 years
3 participants3 participants6 participants
Age, Customized
50-59 years
11 participants9 participants20 participants
Age, Customized
60-69 years
8 participants9 participants17 participants
Age, Customized
70-79 years
3 participants2 participants5 participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
11 Participants3 Participants14 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
13 Participants18 Participants31 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants3 Participants4 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
7 participants5 participants12 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Multiracial
0 participants0 participants0 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
2 participants5 participants7 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
16 participants14 participants30 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
10 Participants8 Participants18 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
15 Participants16 Participants31 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 256 / 24
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 250 / 24
serious
Total, serious adverse events
11 / 256 / 24

Outcome results

Primary

Graft Survival at One Year Post-Transplantation

Analysis was based on the amount of liver allografts in each cohort that were deemed to be clinically functional at 1 year post-transplantation (i.e. no re-transplantation required).

Time frame: Post-Operative Day 1 to Day 365

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Matched Control GroupGraft Survival at One Year Post-Transplantation23 grafts
Experimental: Hypothermic Machine Perfusion GroupGraft Survival at One Year Post-Transplantation23 grafts
Primary

Patient Survival at One Year Post-Transplantation

Time frame: Post-Operative Day 1 to Day 365

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Matched Control GroupPatient Survival at One Year Post-Transplantation19 participants
Experimental: Hypothermic Machine Perfusion GroupPatient Survival at One Year Post-Transplantation19 participants
Secondary

Hospital Length of Stay (Index Transplant Hospitalization)

Length of transplant hospital stay post-transplantation (Index Transplant Hospitalization)

Time frame: First admission after transplant

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Matched Control GroupHospital Length of Stay (Index Transplant Hospitalization)16.5 days
Experimental: Hypothermic Machine Perfusion GroupHospital Length of Stay (Index Transplant Hospitalization)10 days
Secondary

Incidence of Bile Leaks

Incidence of bile leaks.

Time frame: Post-Operative Day 1 to Day 365

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Matched Control GroupIncidence of Bile Leaks3 events
Experimental: Hypothermic Machine Perfusion GroupIncidence of Bile Leaks0 events
Secondary

Incidence of Biliary Strictures

Incidence of biliary strictures.

Time frame: Post-Operative Day 1 to Day 365

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Matched Control GroupIncidence of Biliary Strictures10 events
Experimental: Hypothermic Machine Perfusion GroupIncidence of Biliary Strictures2 events
Secondary

Incidence of Early Allograft Dysfunction (EAD)

Incidence of Early Allograft Dysfunction (EAD), defined as follows: * Bilirubin \>10 on post-operative day (POD)#7 * International normalized ratio (INR) \>1.6 on POD#7 * Transaminase level (aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or alanine aminotransferase (ALT)) \>2000 within the first 7 days

Time frame: Within the first 7 days post-transplantation

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Matched Control GroupIncidence of Early Allograft Dysfunction (EAD)9 participants
Experimental: Hypothermic Machine Perfusion GroupIncidence of Early Allograft Dysfunction (EAD)5 participants
Secondary

Incidence of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatographies (ERCPs)

Incidence of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographies (ERCPs)

Time frame: Post-Operative Day 1 to Day 365

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Matched Control GroupIncidence of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatographies (ERCPs)35 events
Experimental: Hypothermic Machine Perfusion GroupIncidence of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatographies (ERCPs)7 events
Secondary

Incidence of Hernia Events Within 1 Year Post-Transplantation

Time frame: Post-Operative Day 1 to Day 365

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Matched Control GroupIncidence of Hernia Events Within 1 Year Post-Transplantation2 hernia events
Experimental: Hypothermic Machine Perfusion GroupIncidence of Hernia Events Within 1 Year Post-Transplantation4 hernia events
Secondary

Incidence of Post-Operative Complications

Incidence of Retransplants or Hepatic Artery Thrombosis (HAT) within 1 month post-transplantation

Time frame: 1 Month Post-Transplantation

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Matched Control GroupIncidence of Post-Operative ComplicationsRetransplant0 participants
Matched Control GroupIncidence of Post-Operative ComplicationsHAT1 participants
Experimental: Hypothermic Machine Perfusion GroupIncidence of Post-Operative ComplicationsRetransplant1 participants
Experimental: Hypothermic Machine Perfusion GroupIncidence of Post-Operative ComplicationsHAT1 participants
Secondary

Incidence of Primary Graft Nonfunction

Incidence of Primary Graft Nonfunction (PNF), defined as follows: * Relisted for orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) within 7 days of OLT, not for vascular thromboses * Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) \>2000 and one or both of: acidosis with pH \<7.3 or lactate \>2X (two times) normal * International normalized ratio (INR) \>2.5

Time frame: Post-Operative Day 1 to Day 7

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Matched Control GroupIncidence of Primary Graft Nonfunction2 participants
Experimental: Hypothermic Machine Perfusion GroupIncidence of Primary Graft Nonfunction1 participants
Secondary

Incidence of Re-Operation For Bleeding

Incidence of patients who required re-operation for a bleeding event

Time frame: Post-Operative Day 1 to Day 365

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Matched Control GroupIncidence of Re-Operation For Bleeding5 participants
Experimental: Hypothermic Machine Perfusion GroupIncidence of Re-Operation For Bleeding2 participants
Secondary

Time With Stent (Days)

Measure of biliary complications as evidenced by mean time with stent (in days).

Time frame: Post-Operative Day 1 to Day 365

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Matched Control GroupTime With Stent (Days)86 days
Experimental: Hypothermic Machine Perfusion GroupTime With Stent (Days)66.5 days

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026