Skip to content

GP2013 in the Treatment of RA Patients Refractory to or Intolerant of Standard Therapy

A Randomized, Double-blind, Controlled Study to Evaluate PK, PD, Safety and Efficacy of GP2013 and Rituximab in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis Refractory or Intolerant to Standard DMARDs and up to Three Anti-TNF Therapies.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01274182
Enrollment
312
Registered
2011-01-11
Start date
2011-01-31
Completion date
2016-11-30
Last updated
2018-01-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Rheumatoid Arthritis

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine the PK/PD, efficacy and safety of GP2013 in patients with severe rheumatoid arthritis.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALGP2013

1000 mg iv infusion on two separate occasions, two weeks apart (i.e. on Day 1 and on Day 15)

BIOLOGICALMabThera

1000 mg iv infusion on two separate occasions, two weeks apart (i.e. on Day 1 and on Day 15)

BIOLOGICALRituxan

1000 mg iv infusion on two separate occasions, two weeks apart (i.e. on Day 1 and on Day 15)

Sponsors

Novartis Pharmaceuticals
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Sandoz
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Rheumatoid arthritis as defined by the 1987 ACR classification * Severe active seropositive disease * Inadequate response or intolerance to other DMARDs and anti-TNFs * Treatment with Methotrexate

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with systemic manifestations of rheumatoid arthritis * Female patients nursing * Women of childbearing potential unless using birth control * Active infection * Known immunodeficiency syndrome * Positive Hepatitis B surface antigen or antibodies to Hepatitis C * History of cancer Other protocol-defined inclusion/

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
AUC(0-inf) of GP2013, MabThera and Rituxan Following IV Infusion in Patients With RAFrom baseline to 24 weeksArea under the curve AUC(0-inf) calculated based on serum samples, collected from baseline up to 24 weeks: Day 1, 4, 8, 15, 18, 29, 57, 85,113 and 169

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Maximum Serum Concentration (Cmax) of GP2013, MabThera and Rituxan Following IV Infusion in Patients With RAFrom baseline to week 24Maximum serum concentration (Cmax) after the first infusion of GP2013, MabThera and Rituxan in patients with RA. Samples collected from baseline up to 24 weeks: Day 1, 4, 8, 15, 18, 29, 57, 85,113 and 169.
Area Under the Effect Curve From Baseline to Day 14 (AUEC(0-14d)) of Percent B-cells of GP2013, MabThera and Rituxan in Patients With RA14 daysArea under the effect curve of percent change of peripheral B-cell count from baseline to Day 14 (AUEC(0-14d)) of GP2013, MabThera and Rituxan in patients with RA
Change From Baseline in DAS28(CRP) at Week 2424 weeksChange from baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 joint count - C-reactive proteine DAS28(CRP) at Week 24. In order to calculate the DAS28(CRP) the number of tender joints and swollen joints were assessed using 28-joint count (tender28 and swollen28).The patient's global assessment of disease activity (GH) measured on a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS from 0mm - best to 100mm - worst) was obtained. DAS28(CRP) = 0.56 \* sqrt(tender28) + 0.28\* sqrt(swollen28) + 0.36 \* ln(CRP+1) + 0.014 \* GH + 0.96 The DAS28(CRP) provides a number on a scale from 0 to 10 indicating the current activity of the RA, while lower values correspond with less disease activity. A decrease in DAS28 signifies a clinical improvement.
Summary of Disease Activity According to CDAIAt week 24In order to calculate the Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) the number of tender and swollen joints were assessed using the 28 -joint count (tender28 and swollen28). The patient's global assessment of disease activity and the physician's global assessment of disease activity were measured using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of 10 cm (from 0=best to 10=worst). CDAI = tender28 + swollen28 + patient's global assessment (in cm) + physician's global assessment (in cm)
Summary of Disease Activity According to SDAIAt week 24In order to calculate the Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) the number of tender and swollen joints were assessed using the 28 -joint count (tender28 and swollen28). The patient's global assessment of disease activity and the physician's global assessment of disease activity were measured using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of 10 cm (from 0=best to 10=worst). SDAI = CDAI + CRP (in mg/dL) (CDAI = tender28 + swollen28 + patient's global assessment (in cm) + physician's global assessment (in cm))
Participant Response as Assessed by EULAR Response CriteriaAt week 24Present DAS28 ≤ 3.2 (low): good response (if improvement \> 1.2), moderate response (if improvement \>0.6 and ≤ 1.2), no response (if improvement ≤ 0.6). Present DAS28 \> 3.2 to ≤ 5.1 (moderate): moderate response (if improvement \> 1.2), moderate response (if improvement \>0.6 and ≤ 1.2), no response (if improvement ≤ 0.6). Present DAS28 \> 5.1 (high): moderate response (if improvement \> 1.2), no response (if improvement \>0.6 and ≤ 1.2), no response (if improvement ≤ 0.6).
Number of Patients With ACR20 (CRP) Response24 weeksA patient will be considered as improved according the ACR20 criteria * at least 20 % improvement from baseline in tender joint count, using the 68-joint count * at least 20 % improvement from baseline in swollen joint count, using the 66-joint count * and at least 20% improvement from baseline in a least 3 of the following 5 measures: * Patient's assessment of RA pain (VAS 100 mm) * Patient's global assessment of disease activity (VAS 100 mm) * Physician's global assessment of disease activity (VAS 100 mm) * Patient self-assessed disability (Health Assessment Questionnaire disability index) * Acute phase reactant (C-reactive protein or erythrocyte sedimentation rate)

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Patients With at Least One Anti-Drug-Antibody (ADA) Positive Serum Samplethrough study completion, an average of 1 yearNumber of patients with at least one post-baseline Anti-Drug-Antibody (ADA) positive serum sample until the last study visit. Sampling was at Day 1, 29, 113, 169, 267, 365, optional visit 1 (could be at any time between day 169 - week 24 and day 365 - week 52 for patients, who received a 2nd treatment course) and optional visit 2 (only applicable for patients, who received a 2nd treatment course, 26 weeks thereafter, if this was after day 365 - week 52).

Countries

Argentina, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Estonia, France, Germany, Hungary, India, Italy, Romania, Spain, Turkey (Türkiye), United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
GP2013
GP2013: 1000 mg iv infusion on two separate occasions, two weeks apart (i.e. on Day 1 and on Day 15)
133
MabThera
MabThera: 1000 mg iv infusion on two separate occasions, two weeks apart (i.e. on Day 1 and on Day 15)
87
Rituxan
Rituxan: 1000 mg iv infusion on two separate occasions, two weeks apart (i.e. on Day 1 and on Day 15)
92
Total312

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyAdverse Event453
Overall StudyDeath101
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up231
Overall StudyProtocol Violation320
Overall StudyUnsatisfactory therapeutic effect634
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject553

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicMabTheraTotalRituxanGP2013
Age, Continuous52.17 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.531
54.10 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.701
54.95 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.75
54.42 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.779
Anti-drug antibodies (ADA)
Missing
0 Participants3 Participants2 Participants1 Participants
Anti-drug antibodies (ADA)
Negative
85 Participants304 Participants87 Participants132 Participants
Anti-drug antibodies (ADA)
Positive
2 Participants5 Participants3 Participants0 Participants
Body Mass Index (BMI)27.25 kg/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6
28.02 kg/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.353
29.66 kg/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.606
27.37 kg/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.23
Disease Activity Score 28 joint count - C-reactive proteine (DAS28-CRP)5.85 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.88
5.86 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.935
5.91 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.009
5.83 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.922
Dose of methotrexate at baseline14.65 mg/week
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.154
15.03 mg/week
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.939
15.29 mg/week
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.888
15.09 mg/week
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.856
Duration of Rheumatoid Arthritis(RA)10.81 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.137
10.78 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.874
11.10 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.299
10.53 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.074
Number of patients having received 1, 2 or >2 TNF inhibitor therapies.
1
70 Participants252 Participants73 Participants109 Participants
Number of patients having received 1, 2 or >2 TNF inhibitor therapies.
2
16 Participants47 Participants13 Participants18 Participants
Number of patients having received 1, 2 or >2 TNF inhibitor therapies.
>2
1 Participants13 Participants6 Participants6 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
12 Participants24 Participants0 Participants12 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
6 Participants13 Participants6 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants13 Participants11 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
68 Participants260 Participants75 Participants117 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Argentina
3 participants20 participants9 participants8 participants
Region of Enrollment
Austria
10 participants20 participants3 participants7 participants
Region of Enrollment
Belgium
4 participants5 participants0 participants1 participants
Region of Enrollment
Brazil
12 participants50 participants19 participants19 participants
Region of Enrollment
Estonia
0 participants2 participants1 participants1 participants
Region of Enrollment
France
1 participants5 participants0 participants4 participants
Region of Enrollment
Germany
17 participants62 participants14 participants31 participants
Region of Enrollment
Hungary
0 participants4 participants1 participants3 participants
Region of Enrollment
India
12 participants24 participants0 participants12 participants
Region of Enrollment
Italy
3 participants11 participants3 participants5 participants
Region of Enrollment
Romania
8 participants23 participants6 participants9 participants
Region of Enrollment
Russia
0 participants17 participants11 participants6 participants
Region of Enrollment
Spain
16 participants33 participants4 participants13 participants
Region of Enrollment
Turkey
1 participants7 participants2 participants4 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
0 participants29 participants19 participants10 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
73 Participants262 Participants78 Participants111 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
14 Participants50 Participants14 Participants22 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
1 / 1330 / 871 / 92
other
Total, other adverse events
87 / 13356 / 8760 / 92
serious
Total, serious adverse events
16 / 13314 / 879 / 92

Outcome results

Primary

AUC(0-inf) of GP2013, MabThera and Rituxan Following IV Infusion in Patients With RA

Area under the curve AUC(0-inf) calculated based on serum samples, collected from baseline up to 24 weeks: Day 1, 4, 8, 15, 18, 29, 57, 85,113 and 169

Time frame: From baseline to 24 weeks

Population: PK Analysis Set

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
GP2013AUC(0-inf) of GP2013, MabThera and Rituxan Following IV Infusion in Patients With RA7627.44 day*mcg/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 38.6
MabTheraAUC(0-inf) of GP2013, MabThera and Rituxan Following IV Infusion in Patients With RA6896.97 day*mcg/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 40.56
RituxanAUC(0-inf) of GP2013, MabThera and Rituxan Following IV Infusion in Patients With RA7536.89 day*mcg/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 40.28
Comparison: PK bioequivalence is defined as AUC(0-inf) of the drugs being comparable, i.e. the two-sided 90% CI for the ratio of the geometric means (GP2013/MabThera) is within the predefined bioequivalence limits of 0.8 to 1.25.90% CI: [1.01, 1.21]
Comparison: PK bioequivalence is defined as AUC(0-inf) of the drugs being comparable, i.e. the two-sided 90% CI for the ratio of the geometric means (GP2013/MabThera) is within the predefined bioequivalence limits of 0.8 to 1.25.90% CI: [0.925, 1.108]
Comparison: PK bioequivalence is defined as AUC(0-inf) of the drugs being comparable, i.e. the two-sided 90% CI for the ratio of the geometric means (GP2013/MabThera) is within the predefined bioequivalence limits of 0.8 to 1.25.90% CI: [0.989, 1.208]
Secondary

Area Under the Effect Curve From Baseline to Day 14 (AUEC(0-14d)) of Percent B-cells of GP2013, MabThera and Rituxan in Patients With RA

Area under the effect curve of percent change of peripheral B-cell count from baseline to Day 14 (AUEC(0-14d)) of GP2013, MabThera and Rituxan in patients with RA

Time frame: 14 days

Population: PK analysis set

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
GP2013Area Under the Effect Curve From Baseline to Day 14 (AUEC(0-14d)) of Percent B-cells of GP2013, MabThera and Rituxan in Patients With RA1226.53 % * dayGeometric Coefficient of Variation 2.83
MabTheraArea Under the Effect Curve From Baseline to Day 14 (AUEC(0-14d)) of Percent B-cells of GP2013, MabThera and Rituxan in Patients With RA1201.15 % * dayGeometric Coefficient of Variation 8.91
RituxanArea Under the Effect Curve From Baseline to Day 14 (AUEC(0-14d)) of Percent B-cells of GP2013, MabThera and Rituxan in Patients With RA1240.57 % * dayGeometric Coefficient of Variation 1.95
Comparison: To conclude equivalence the 95% CI must be entirely within the standard equivalencelimits of 0.8-1.2595% CI: [0.974, 1.004]
Comparison: To conclude equivalence the 95% CI must be entirely within the standard equivalencelimits of 0.8-1.2595% CI: [1.003, 1.04]
Comparison: To conclude equivalence the 95% CI must be entirely within the standard equivalence limits of 0.8-1.2595% CI: [1.016, 1.05]
Secondary

Change From Baseline in DAS28(CRP) at Week 24

Change from baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 joint count - C-reactive proteine DAS28(CRP) at Week 24. In order to calculate the DAS28(CRP) the number of tender joints and swollen joints were assessed using 28-joint count (tender28 and swollen28).The patient's global assessment of disease activity (GH) measured on a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS from 0mm - best to 100mm - worst) was obtained. DAS28(CRP) = 0.56 \* sqrt(tender28) + 0.28\* sqrt(swollen28) + 0.36 \* ln(CRP+1) + 0.014 \* GH + 0.96 The DAS28(CRP) provides a number on a scale from 0 to 10 indicating the current activity of the RA, while lower values correspond with less disease activity. A decrease in DAS28 signifies a clinical improvement.

Time frame: 24 weeks

Population: PP analysis set

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
GP2013Change From Baseline in DAS28(CRP) at Week 24-2.07 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.103
MabTheraChange From Baseline in DAS28(CRP) at Week 24-2.23 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.143
RituxanChange From Baseline in DAS28(CRP) at Week 24-1.99 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.126
GP2013 Part IChange From Baseline in DAS28(CRP) at Week 24-2.16 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.142
Comparison: To conclude non-inferiority the upper 95% CI should be less than or equal to 0.6. This margin was statistically justified by the results of the REFLEX (Randomized Evaluation of Long-Term Efficacy of Rituximab in RA) trial (Cohen et al 2006) providing a 95% CI for the mean difference between rituximab/MTX and MTX alone of (-1.74;-1.25). The margin of 0.6 was determined by retaining more than 50% of the reference treatment effect which was considered clinically acceptable.95% CI: [-0.397, 0.24]
Comparison: To conclude non-inferiority the upper 95% CI should be less than or equal to 0.6. This margin was statistically justified by the results of the REFLEX (Randomized Evaluation of Long-Term Efficacy of Rituximab in RA) trial (Cohen et al 2006) providing a 95% CI for the mean difference between rituximab/MTX and MTX alone of (-1.74;-1.25). The margin of 0.6 was determined by retaining more than 50% of the reference treatment effect which was considered clinically acceptable.95% CI: [-0.328, 0.462]
Secondary

Maximum Serum Concentration (Cmax) of GP2013, MabThera and Rituxan Following IV Infusion in Patients With RA

Maximum serum concentration (Cmax) after the first infusion of GP2013, MabThera and Rituxan in patients with RA. Samples collected from baseline up to 24 weeks: Day 1, 4, 8, 15, 18, 29, 57, 85,113 and 169.

Time frame: From baseline to week 24

Population: PK Analysis Set

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
GP2013Maximum Serum Concentration (Cmax) of GP2013, MabThera and Rituxan Following IV Infusion in Patients With RA361.53 mcg/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 40.82
MabTheraMaximum Serum Concentration (Cmax) of GP2013, MabThera and Rituxan Following IV Infusion in Patients With RA319.80 mcg/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 42.75
RituxanMaximum Serum Concentration (Cmax) of GP2013, MabThera and Rituxan Following IV Infusion in Patients With RA335.88 mcg/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 42.65
Comparison: To conclude bioequivalence the 90% CI must be entirely within the standard equivalence limits of 0.8-1.25.90% CI: [0.979, 1.184]
Comparison: To conclude bioequivalence the 90% CI must be entirely within the standard equivalence limits of 0.8-1.2590% CI: [1.027, 1.244]
Comparison: To conclude bioequivalence the 90% CI must be entirely within the standard equivalence limits of 0.8-1.25.90% CI: [0.946, 1.167]
Secondary

Number of Patients With ACR20 (CRP) Response

A patient will be considered as improved according the ACR20 criteria * at least 20 % improvement from baseline in tender joint count, using the 68-joint count * at least 20 % improvement from baseline in swollen joint count, using the 66-joint count * and at least 20% improvement from baseline in a least 3 of the following 5 measures: * Patient's assessment of RA pain (VAS 100 mm) * Patient's global assessment of disease activity (VAS 100 mm) * Physician's global assessment of disease activity (VAS 100 mm) * Patient self-assessed disability (Health Assessment Questionnaire disability index) * Acute phase reactant (C-reactive protein or erythrocyte sedimentation rate)

Time frame: 24 weeks

Population: PP analysis set

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
GP2013Number of Patients With ACR20 (CRP) Response86 Participants
MabTheraNumber of Patients With ACR20 (CRP) Response55 Participants
RituxanNumber of Patients With ACR20 (CRP) Response50 Participants
GP2013 Part INumber of Patients With ACR20 (CRP) Response56 Participants
Comparison: To conclude non-inferiority the lower 95% CI should be greater than -15.0%.95% CI: [-3.54, 23.08]
Comparison: To conclude non-inferiority the lower 95% CI should be greater than -15.0%.95% CI: [-14.74, 13.6]
Secondary

Participant Response as Assessed by EULAR Response Criteria

Present DAS28 ≤ 3.2 (low): good response (if improvement \> 1.2), moderate response (if improvement \>0.6 and ≤ 1.2), no response (if improvement ≤ 0.6). Present DAS28 \> 3.2 to ≤ 5.1 (moderate): moderate response (if improvement \> 1.2), moderate response (if improvement \>0.6 and ≤ 1.2), no response (if improvement ≤ 0.6). Present DAS28 \> 5.1 (high): moderate response (if improvement \> 1.2), no response (if improvement \>0.6 and ≤ 1.2), no response (if improvement ≤ 0.6).

Time frame: At week 24

Population: PP analysis set

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
GP2013Participant Response as Assessed by EULAR Response CriteriaGood response0 Participants
GP2013Participant Response as Assessed by EULAR Response CriteriaNo response15 Participants
GP2013Participant Response as Assessed by EULAR Response CriteriaModerate response101 Participants
MabTheraParticipant Response as Assessed by EULAR Response CriteriaGood response0 Participants
MabTheraParticipant Response as Assessed by EULAR Response CriteriaNo response16 Participants
MabTheraParticipant Response as Assessed by EULAR Response CriteriaModerate response61 Participants
RituxanParticipant Response as Assessed by EULAR Response CriteriaModerate response67 Participants
RituxanParticipant Response as Assessed by EULAR Response CriteriaGood response0 Participants
RituxanParticipant Response as Assessed by EULAR Response CriteriaNo response9 Participants
GP2013 Part IParticipant Response as Assessed by EULAR Response CriteriaGood response0 Participants
GP2013 Part IParticipant Response as Assessed by EULAR Response CriteriaNo response12 Participants
GP2013 Part IParticipant Response as Assessed by EULAR Response CriteriaModerate response63 Participants
Secondary

Summary of Disease Activity According to CDAI

In order to calculate the Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) the number of tender and swollen joints were assessed using the 28 -joint count (tender28 and swollen28). The patient's global assessment of disease activity and the physician's global assessment of disease activity were measured using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of 10 cm (from 0=best to 10=worst). CDAI = tender28 + swollen28 + patient's global assessment (in cm) + physician's global assessment (in cm)

Time frame: At week 24

Population: PP analysis set

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
GP2013Summary of Disease Activity According to CDAIHigh disease activity26 Participants
GP2013Summary of Disease Activity According to CDAIModerate disease activity45 Participants
GP2013Summary of Disease Activity According to CDAILow disease activity41 Participants
GP2013Summary of Disease Activity According to CDAIRemission7 Participants
MabTheraSummary of Disease Activity According to CDAIRemission3 Participants
MabTheraSummary of Disease Activity According to CDAILow disease activity25 Participants
MabTheraSummary of Disease Activity According to CDAIModerate disease activity32 Participants
MabTheraSummary of Disease Activity According to CDAIHigh disease activity20 Participants
RituxanSummary of Disease Activity According to CDAILow disease activity30 Participants
RituxanSummary of Disease Activity According to CDAIRemission6 Participants
RituxanSummary of Disease Activity According to CDAIModerate disease activity24 Participants
RituxanSummary of Disease Activity According to CDAIHigh disease activity18 Participants
GP2013 Part ISummary of Disease Activity According to CDAIModerate disease activity26 Participants
GP2013 Part ISummary of Disease Activity According to CDAIHigh disease activity18 Participants
GP2013 Part ISummary of Disease Activity According to CDAIRemission12 Participants
GP2013 Part ISummary of Disease Activity According to CDAILow disease activity19 Participants
Secondary

Summary of Disease Activity According to SDAI

In order to calculate the Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) the number of tender and swollen joints were assessed using the 28 -joint count (tender28 and swollen28). The patient's global assessment of disease activity and the physician's global assessment of disease activity were measured using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of 10 cm (from 0=best to 10=worst). SDAI = CDAI + CRP (in mg/dL) (CDAI = tender28 + swollen28 + patient's global assessment (in cm) + physician's global assessment (in cm))

Time frame: At week 24

Population: PP analysis set

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
GP2013Summary of Disease Activity According to SDAIHigh disease activity20 Participants
GP2013Summary of Disease Activity According to SDAIRemission8 Participants
GP2013Summary of Disease Activity According to SDAIModerate disease activity48 Participants
GP2013Summary of Disease Activity According to SDAILow disease activity41 Participants
MabTheraSummary of Disease Activity According to SDAIModerate disease activity34 Participants
MabTheraSummary of Disease Activity According to SDAILow disease activity26 Participants
MabTheraSummary of Disease Activity According to SDAIHigh disease activity15 Participants
MabTheraSummary of Disease Activity According to SDAIRemission2 Participants
RituxanSummary of Disease Activity According to SDAIModerate disease activity27 Participants
RituxanSummary of Disease Activity According to SDAIHigh disease activity13 Participants
RituxanSummary of Disease Activity According to SDAILow disease activity31 Participants
RituxanSummary of Disease Activity According to SDAIRemission6 Participants
GP2013 Part ISummary of Disease Activity According to SDAIHigh disease activity15 Participants
GP2013 Part ISummary of Disease Activity According to SDAIModerate disease activity29 Participants
GP2013 Part ISummary of Disease Activity According to SDAIRemission12 Participants
GP2013 Part ISummary of Disease Activity According to SDAILow disease activity18 Participants
Other Pre-specified

Number of Patients With at Least One Anti-Drug-Antibody (ADA) Positive Serum Sample

Number of patients with at least one post-baseline Anti-Drug-Antibody (ADA) positive serum sample until the last study visit. Sampling was at Day 1, 29, 113, 169, 267, 365, optional visit 1 (could be at any time between day 169 - week 24 and day 365 - week 52 for patients, who received a 2nd treatment course) and optional visit 2 (only applicable for patients, who received a 2nd treatment course, 26 weeks thereafter, if this was after day 365 - week 52).

Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year

Population: Patients with positive ADA results at randomization were excluded from analysis

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
GP2013Number of Patients With at Least One Anti-Drug-Antibody (ADA) Positive Serum Sample21 participants
MabTheraNumber of Patients With at Least One Anti-Drug-Antibody (ADA) Positive Serum Sample18 participants
RituxanNumber of Patients With at Least One Anti-Drug-Antibody (ADA) Positive Serum Sample11 participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 26, 2026